What a class-less statement. Specter is the epitome of an unprincipled politician who will do or say anything to keep his job. I'm thrilled he was finally voted out of office (in the Democratic primary, no less).
You'd think the RepubliCON Party would ask for a FEDERAL BAILOUT due to their holding NO true VALUE anymore, embarrassing down-sizing, & being TOTALLY unsuccessful when it comes to having a say in ANY matters which reach the House or Senate Floor. (LOL)
Flush Dimbaugh needs to get OFF the Oxy-Contin....it's obviously eaten away his brain!
President Obama was also right about John Boehner. He needs to do something about the cheap face-tan color spray he uses daily.
Lying may be a harsh word, but that's exactly what he's doing in this video. Through his teeth.
The website he mentions, SpecterFortheCure, ha NOTHING to do with Cancer research. It's his personal campaign site for re-election donations.
This mouth breather is trying to dupe people into thinking money they give him to buy power with will be used to cure cancer. The name for that is fraud.
sorry Mr. Spector but research to save lives goes against UN Agenda 21 which is world depopulation.. Pharma makes the illness then offers you the cure and if the illness doesn't kill you the cure will..
Arlen Spector is truly a scumbag. Using Jack Kemps death to score political points with his new buddies. Hes only out for himself, always has been, always will. Total piece of scum.
This is sick! Using someone's death for political gain. I give it to Arlen "PIECE OF SHIT SPECTER" He sounds like a democrat. Remember during the 04 campaign, Edwards said if Kerry is president Christopher Reave would walk again! NO CLASS! TASTELESS
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I love the smell of Republican fake moral outrage in the morning. Arlen, like Reagan said, you didn't leave the GOP, the GOP left you. That's why the GOP is slowly pushing themselves off the cliff due to religious, right wing nutcases who are pro-birth (not pro-life as that implies caring for life at ALL phases of the growth cycle). The GOP only cares about life around gestation and could give a crap less AFTER delivery.
I'd take you more seriously NORMALUSAORG, if you actually knew the difference between the word "your" and "you're" and when to use it appropriately. Stupid inbred.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You are so correct! If the Republicans are so pro-life, why do they send off babies to fight wars without hesitation? That's what I called a double standard.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The GOP could care less if people children die from poverty, abuse, lack of healthcare, or grow up and die in their neocon fantasy wars of nation building. Their "pro-life" moniker is a farce. Interesting how they don't protest in vitro fertilization clinics for infertile couples, who end up disposing embryos which are not implanted after a certain period of time. But GOD FORBID, we find a cure from embryonic stem cells that have the potential to help LIVING people with ailing diseases.
Wow, strong words. Do you really feel that way? I'm a conservative and I'm for Gay Marriage, and adult stem cell research, and I know that there are alot of others conservatives out there that feel the same way. Enough with the hate, democrats and repubs are both laughing as the masses bicker over who is right and who is wrong.
Funny adult stem cell research when those cells have only a very limited potentiation of becoming other cells, unlike embryonic stem cells that are pluripotent and have the ability to become ANY cell with proper growth factors and culture medium. How convenient.
It's a sad day when someone can support a cause that takes advantage of potential life. You know what the cure to cancer is? watching what you eat and staying physically active.
as i am sure you are well aware, the GOP didn't outlaw embryonic stem cell research. they just cut back on federal funding. Businesses are allowed to fund it as much as they want. If they are as promising as you think they are then i am sure private companies will invest billions in hopes of finding a cure and making money off the cure. the GOP isn't against stem cell research, we just don't want taxpayers to pay for it when private businesses are willing to.
Hmm, yet you forget 9/11, which happened NINE MONTHS when Bush was in office. So tell me, who kept us "safe" from January 2001 till then? Clinton right? Oh wait, Republicans won't give him credit, only blame right? That's why conservatives always start the clock for GWB AFTER 9/11. Do you think they would have done the same courtesy for Democrats?
Right, so you would think GWB would have learned the lesson to be learned from that esp. since he was left a set of initiatives in a memo by the outgoing administration. By your logic then GWB has not kept us safe as 9/11 happened during GWB's administration, or is your criticism only for Democratic administrations?
Obl determined to attack in the Usa, using planes. Pretty Vague, what's he suppossed to do! Cause panic and fear, close the airport. What should he have done! SMART GUY! You probably think when he was reading the book to the kids the morning of 9-11, Card whispered in his ear were under attack. Bush should've jumped out of his seat scaring the shit out of the kids. Till the day I die, I'll always be thankful for W!
If Clinton's initiatives had been worth a crap, Clinton would have cleared up the problem long before Bush got into office. Clinton did virtually nothing to pursue those responsible for the first attack, which made us vulnerable to a second attack. Bush made us safer, Clinton didn't. It's not a Republican vs. Democrat debate, it's an effective vs. not effective debate.
That's true, that happened on Clinton's watch and I held him accountable for that. But can the right hold Bush accountable for 9/11 to happen on his watch?
We could hold Bush accountable for 9/11 if there was something he should have done but didn't. NOBODY saw that coming. The prospect of Airliners being hijacked and used as weapons was unheard of. Pilots were trained to that point to give in to demands and get the hijacking over with. Bush had intel that said Al Qeada is preparing an attack, but nothing actionable or specific. The fact they never tried it after Bush DID act is a credit to his Presidency: Protect the American people.
Clinton never saw it coming? Never saw what coming??? The concept of a truck filled with explosives? Blowing up a building? Cuz I'm pretty sure bad guys have been blowing them up ever since trucks and explosives were invented. THAT concept completely blind-sided him huh?
Let's not forget that if Clinton had done his job, 9/11 wouldn't be an issue cause it wouldn't have happened. How many times did the Sudan offer Bin Laden up on a platter and Clinton said no???
Actually, Clinton clarified this on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace. He could not get the CIA and the FBI authorize the hunt for Bin Laden and he failed. He admitted to it. After all the rectic, this does not excuse Bush for not getting him. Why can't you admit Bush has ultimately failed? I'll admit he did his best to protect the country, but his economic and foreign policies has been a disaster.
9-11 happend cause Clinton did nothing to stop Al Queda. 93 WTC, 2 African Embassy bombings, Cobar Towers, Blackhawk down, pulled out 2 weeks later, Bin Laden said "were a paper tiger." Uss Kohl. All that happened on Bill's watch. They tested W once, no more attacks! Yeah I credit W for keeping us safe! You anti American pieces of shit, you Al Queda sympathizers. You all want to prosecute the man that kept you safe! YOU UNGRATEFUL SOB!
LOL! Well Bush had a chance to correct Clinton's mistakes for 9 months. Why didn't he? Second, why did he and his officials falsify intel to connect Iraq to 9/11 which turned out to be untrue. And where's Bin Laden? Oh thats right...Bush once said he's not concerned about him.
LOL! I hope youre joking. Bush's intel committee admitted there was no direct connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda. Richard Clarke could tell you that.
You honestly believe that Al Qaeda were friends with Saddam Hussein? Trust me, Saddam was an enemy to terrorist groups including Al Qaeda. Since he's gone, Al Qaeda is there just so they can control the oil pipeline just like we're there to do.
Saddam Hussein had a standing offer for terrorist suicide bombers: blow yourself up to kill innocent Israelis & Americans, and Saddam would pay a US$30,000 cash reward to your family. (The purpose was to encourage suicide bombings, since some suicide bombers were reluctant to leave their families w/o a breadwinner.)
Saddam was also filling his country with mass graves, and we have him on tape discussing his nuclear weapons development program.
Dan is a typical liberal, If the facts can't support his leftist lunacy, then like a good lib, he will change the facts and then become indignant when called on it. The true facts only confuse liberals
LOL! You're very funny Howard! Keep this up and the republican party will desolve just like the Whig Party in the 1900s. I take it that you're a neocon nutclown that will justify Bush's actions as President at any cost and cannot admit to his blunders and mistakes.
Don't you tell me that I'm distorting the facts, it seems that you've eluded some of my questions but instead you attack me for my liberal views. We can have a debate about these issues, but don't act like a kid!
I woill defend Bush's actions that were right with the same level I will criticize those that were wrong. I have ducked NONE of your questions but simply repudiated your false rhetoric. I am sorry that you can't accept the truth of the statement, but facts only confuse liberals...Have a nice day
dancharter, do you actually believe that Saddam and his nuclear scientists were play-acting on those tapes, where they discussed the progress of his nuclear weapons development program? And do you believe that those Kurds and Iranians just pretended to be gassed? Do you believe the Marsh Arabs slaughtered themselves? Do you think Israel goofed when they destroyed his nuclear reactor?
Do you think Clinton, Pelosi, Berger, Albright, Kennedy, Gore, etc., all LIED when they warned of Saddams WMDs?
ncdave4life, lying is a harsh word to use, What I can tell you is that they misled us about Saddam and his nuclear program. In other words, they were wrong. Second, I'm not accusing of Saddam Hussein of play-acting of those tapes. Look the bottom line is, both parties of government did not like Saddam Hussein so they decided to overthrow him power at any cost.
Speaking of Kurds and Iranians being gassed, how do you think Saddam got of hold of those chemical weapons? From us.
I'll bet Dan in unshaken in his acceptance of the claim by Joe Wilson (Mr. Valerie Palme) that Saddam wasn't interested in obtaining yellowcake uranium. I'll bet that 550 tons of uranium has no effect at all on Dan's steadfast acceptance of that discredited claim.
What always gets me about libs is how easy it is to research and prove them wrong time and again, yet their rabid devotion to their dogma makes it impossible to ever admit they are wrong.
from MSNBC, July 5th 2008: The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program — a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium — reached a Canadian port Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.
It appears that you were right, Howard. Like so many liberals, Dan refuses to allow his anti-American opinions to be biased by facts.
First he claimed that Iraq had no WMDs. Now he admits they had WMDs but claims they got 'em from America! He is so sure that the USA is the root of all evil, that he even blames the atrocities of a fervently anti-American genocidal dictator on the USA.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Well, you forgot to mention 9/11 attacks happened on W.'s watch; He and his officials ignored the briefings of the attacks before it happened. Afterwards, falsfying intel to connect Iraq to 9/11 after you guys won't admit that was a wrong thing to do. Second, I know its a voluteer military but it doesn't excuse the fact why does the right support conflict (where ppl die) and claim to be pro-life? Answer that.
Well let's overlook that everything you just said is untrue. what briefing did he "overlook"? the one that said Bin Laden determined to attack US? Now since you're so damn smart, derive 9/11 from that????
LOL! first of all, I'm a pro-life liberal. Let's be honest, there's a double standard with both both parties when it comes to pro-life and pro-abortion.
Shhhh.....(you know that's not allowed right?) That would be thinking for yourself and your side frowns on that. When Obama wants your opinion, he'll give it to you. :)
How Mr Specter do you explain how you have survived cancer many times?
This is just as pathetic as the 2004 election when John Edwards said Christopher Reeves would walk again if John Kerry were elected. This is something both parties should avoid, it is tasteless.
During Republican control of Congress, federal spending on health research and regulation increased 46% after inflation, from $49 billion a year to $72 billion a year, or about 7% increase each year. Thats almost the same rate of increase as Defense spending got in the same period (48%), when we actually had a real war on our hands, and not a political contrivance for excusing federal spending.
Specter can not be serious? My condolences to the Kemp Family for not only the loss of Jack Kemp but the poke in the eye with a sharp stick from Specter. I think we need more money thrown at mental illness now Specter might benefit from that. OMG can he just shut up? All yours Harry.
What a class-less statement. Specter is the epitome of an unprincipled politician who will do or say anything to keep his job. I'm thrilled he was finally voted out of office (in the Democratic primary, no less).
jksonny 1 year ago
Mr. Specter continues to be an idiot.
Inner2be 2 years ago
typical facts from a liberal LOL
magman20005 2 years ago
You'd think the RepubliCON Party would ask for a FEDERAL BAILOUT due to their holding NO true VALUE anymore, embarrassing down-sizing, & being TOTALLY unsuccessful when it comes to having a say in ANY matters which reach the House or Senate Floor. (LOL)
Flush Dimbaugh needs to get OFF the Oxy-Contin....it's obviously eaten away his brain!
President Obama was also right about John Boehner. He needs to do something about the cheap face-tan color spray he uses daily.
R.I.P. GOP ~Scarah Failin
mavrek47 2 years ago
Lying may be a harsh word, but that's exactly what he's doing in this video. Through his teeth.
The website he mentions, SpecterFortheCure, ha NOTHING to do with Cancer research. It's his personal campaign site for re-election donations.
This mouth breather is trying to dupe people into thinking money they give him to buy power with will be used to cure cancer. The name for that is fraud.
Fits right in with the rest of your slimeballs.
You're welcome to him...
wardogs89 2 years ago 2
sorry Mr. Spector but research to save lives goes against UN Agenda 21 which is world depopulation.. Pharma makes the illness then offers you the cure and if the illness doesn't kill you the cure will..
Dewdaahman 2 years ago
The people should be able to change there vote as easily as he changed parties and before he could change over. Arlen sphincter is garbage.
evoval 2 years ago
Spector, you are a disgusting human being. Good riddance.
adoerfler 2 years ago 2
Spector is as big as idiot loon as all other liberals and RINOs, So many liberal left wing idiot loons, so little time.
cam1126 2 years ago 3
You want this guy, Dems? You're welcome to him.
See what you can do about Collins and Snowe. We should have demanded you take them too.
klim8hokes 2 years ago 3
Kemp was twice the man this scumbag could ever dream of being! Good riddance RINO!!!
TuskAmerica 2 years ago 4
Arlen Spector is truly a scumbag. Using Jack Kemps death to score political points with his new buddies. Hes only out for himself, always has been, always will. Total piece of scum.
obamaayers 2 years ago 3
The GOPs of the 1970s are to blame for cancer.....Specter knows all. A dumbass in any party.
fromagevilain 2 years ago
Why stop with curing cancer, Arlen? Why not go for full blown IMMORTALITY? What a douche!
HammerofHeretics 2 years ago 2
This is sick! Using someone's death for political gain. I give it to Arlen "PIECE OF SHIT SPECTER" He sounds like a democrat. Remember during the 04 campaign, Edwards said if Kerry is president Christopher Reave would walk again! NO CLASS! TASTELESS
ed2kou1 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I love the smell of Republican fake moral outrage in the morning. Arlen, like Reagan said, you didn't leave the GOP, the GOP left you. That's why the GOP is slowly pushing themselves off the cliff due to religious, right wing nutcases who are pro-birth (not pro-life as that implies caring for life at ALL phases of the growth cycle). The GOP only cares about life around gestation and could give a crap less AFTER delivery.
rakrobn 2 years ago
your a pussy dude..get your facts stright. this guy is a nut and the democrats should have had him a long time ago. NormalUSA . org
NORMALUSAORG 2 years ago 4
I'd take you more seriously NORMALUSAORG, if you actually knew the difference between the word "your" and "you're" and when to use it appropriately. Stupid inbred.
rakrobn 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You are so correct! If the Republicans are so pro-life, why do they send off babies to fight wars without hesitation? That's what I called a double standard.
dancharter 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The GOP could care less if people children die from poverty, abuse, lack of healthcare, or grow up and die in their neocon fantasy wars of nation building. Their "pro-life" moniker is a farce. Interesting how they don't protest in vitro fertilization clinics for infertile couples, who end up disposing embryos which are not implanted after a certain period of time. But GOD FORBID, we find a cure from embryonic stem cells that have the potential to help LIVING people with ailing diseases.
rakrobn 2 years ago
Wow, strong words. Do you really feel that way? I'm a conservative and I'm for Gay Marriage, and adult stem cell research, and I know that there are alot of others conservatives out there that feel the same way. Enough with the hate, democrats and repubs are both laughing as the masses bicker over who is right and who is wrong.
frankiebaby725 2 years ago
Funny adult stem cell research when those cells have only a very limited potentiation of becoming other cells, unlike embryonic stem cells that are pluripotent and have the ability to become ANY cell with proper growth factors and culture medium. How convenient.
rakrobn 2 years ago
It's a sad day when someone can support a cause that takes advantage of potential life. You know what the cure to cancer is? watching what you eat and staying physically active.
frankiebaby725 2 years ago
Get your facts straight:
Adult stem cells have 70 current treatments currently in use, with 24 more looking promising. Embryonic has zero. Zip. Nada.
Let me guess, you believe Bush was against stem cell research? Bush "banned" embryonic stem cell research? You would be wrong.
Bush just insisted tax dollars not be used. Private funding was never prohibited.
klim8hokes 2 years ago 5
Might as well not try man. Facts only confuse Liberals.....
HowardOfOz3565 2 years ago 2
as i am sure you are well aware, the GOP didn't outlaw embryonic stem cell research. they just cut back on federal funding. Businesses are allowed to fund it as much as they want. If they are as promising as you think they are then i am sure private companies will invest billions in hopes of finding a cure and making money off the cure. the GOP isn't against stem cell research, we just don't want taxpayers to pay for it when private businesses are willing to.
Monty1994 2 years ago
Last time I checked we had a volunteer military. Thx W for keeping us safe. Will we be able to say the same about Obama.
ed2kou1 2 years ago 4
Hmm, yet you forget 9/11, which happened NINE MONTHS when Bush was in office. So tell me, who kept us "safe" from January 2001 till then? Clinton right? Oh wait, Republicans won't give him credit, only blame right? That's why conservatives always start the clock for GWB AFTER 9/11. Do you think they would have done the same courtesy for Democrats?
rakrobn 2 years ago
The first attack on the Twin Towers was during Clinton's administration, so no, he didn't keep us safe.
HammerofHeretics 2 years ago 4
Right, so you would think GWB would have learned the lesson to be learned from that esp. since he was left a set of initiatives in a memo by the outgoing administration. By your logic then GWB has not kept us safe as 9/11 happened during GWB's administration, or is your criticism only for Democratic administrations?
rakrobn 2 years ago
Obl determined to attack in the Usa, using planes. Pretty Vague, what's he suppossed to do! Cause panic and fear, close the airport. What should he have done! SMART GUY! You probably think when he was reading the book to the kids the morning of 9-11, Card whispered in his ear were under attack. Bush should've jumped out of his seat scaring the shit out of the kids. Till the day I die, I'll always be thankful for W!
ed2kou1 2 years ago 2
If Clinton's initiatives had been worth a crap, Clinton would have cleared up the problem long before Bush got into office. Clinton did virtually nothing to pursue those responsible for the first attack, which made us vulnerable to a second attack. Bush made us safer, Clinton didn't. It's not a Republican vs. Democrat debate, it's an effective vs. not effective debate.
HammerofHeretics 2 years ago 5
That's true, that happened on Clinton's watch and I held him accountable for that. But can the right hold Bush accountable for 9/11 to happen on his watch?
dancharter 2 years ago
We could hold Bush accountable for 9/11 if there was something he should have done but didn't. NOBODY saw that coming. The prospect of Airliners being hijacked and used as weapons was unheard of. Pilots were trained to that point to give in to demands and get the hijacking over with. Bush had intel that said Al Qeada is preparing an attack, but nothing actionable or specific. The fact they never tried it after Bush DID act is a credit to his Presidency: Protect the American people.
klim8hokes 2 years ago 2
OK, if you wanna claim that Bush never saw that coming, then we can say Clinton never saw the WTC attacks coming.
dancharter 2 years ago
Most likely true. But the issue is that he did nothing about that attack or any that came after.
HowardOfOz3565 2 years ago
Clinton never saw it coming? Never saw what coming??? The concept of a truck filled with explosives? Blowing up a building? Cuz I'm pretty sure bad guys have been blowing them up ever since trucks and explosives were invented. THAT concept completely blind-sided him huh?
klim8hokes 2 years ago
Let's not forget that if Clinton had done his job, 9/11 wouldn't be an issue cause it wouldn't have happened. How many times did the Sudan offer Bin Laden up on a platter and Clinton said no???
HowardOfOz3565 2 years ago
Actually, Clinton clarified this on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace. He could not get the CIA and the FBI authorize the hunt for Bin Laden and he failed. He admitted to it. After all the rectic, this does not excuse Bush for not getting him. Why can't you admit Bush has ultimately failed? I'll admit he did his best to protect the country, but his economic and foreign policies has been a disaster.
dancharter 2 years ago
He couldn't get the CIA and the FBI to authorize the hunt? He doesn't need to get them to, he tells them to, they work for him
HowardOfOz3565 2 years ago 2
The Sudan offered him up twice, and Slick Willie said no....
HowardOfOz3565 2 years ago 3
Unlike Clinton, Bush struck back.....
HowardOfOz3565 2 years ago 2
Yeah, struck back against the wrong people
dancharter 2 years ago
9-11 happend cause Clinton did nothing to stop Al Queda. 93 WTC, 2 African Embassy bombings, Cobar Towers, Blackhawk down, pulled out 2 weeks later, Bin Laden said "were a paper tiger." Uss Kohl. All that happened on Bill's watch. They tested W once, no more attacks! Yeah I credit W for keeping us safe! You anti American pieces of shit, you Al Queda sympathizers. You all want to prosecute the man that kept you safe! YOU UNGRATEFUL SOB!
ed2kou1 2 years ago 2
LOL! Well Bush had a chance to correct Clinton's mistakes for 9 months. Why didn't he? Second, why did he and his officials falsify intel to connect Iraq to 9/11 which turned out to be untrue. And where's Bin Laden? Oh thats right...Bush once said he's not concerned about him.
dancharter 2 years ago
C'mon. Bush never connected Iraq to 9/11. They coreectly showed ties beteen Iraq and Al Qaeda....big difference
HowardOfOz3565 2 years ago
LOL! I hope youre joking. Bush's intel committee admitted there was no direct connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda. Richard Clarke could tell you that.
dancharter 2 years ago
what about indirect connections? If Al qaeda wasn't in Iraq then, then why are they there now???
HowardOfOz3565 2 years ago 2
You honestly believe that Al Qaeda were friends with Saddam Hussein? Trust me, Saddam was an enemy to terrorist groups including Al Qaeda. Since he's gone, Al Qaeda is there just so they can control the oil pipeline just like we're there to do.
dancharter 2 years ago
dancharter, what on earth are you talking about?
Saddam Hussein had a standing offer for terrorist suicide bombers: blow yourself up to kill innocent Israelis & Americans, and Saddam would pay a US$30,000 cash reward to your family. (The purpose was to encourage suicide bombings, since some suicide bombers were reluctant to leave their families w/o a breadwinner.)
Saddam was also filling his country with mass graves, and we have him on tape discussing his nuclear weapons development program.
ncdave4life 2 years ago
Dan is a typical liberal, If the facts can't support his leftist lunacy, then like a good lib, he will change the facts and then become indignant when called on it. The true facts only confuse liberals
HowardOfOz3565 2 years ago
LOL! You're very funny Howard! Keep this up and the republican party will desolve just like the Whig Party in the 1900s. I take it that you're a neocon nutclown that will justify Bush's actions as President at any cost and cannot admit to his blunders and mistakes.
Don't you tell me that I'm distorting the facts, it seems that you've eluded some of my questions but instead you attack me for my liberal views. We can have a debate about these issues, but don't act like a kid!
dancharter 2 years ago
I woill defend Bush's actions that were right with the same level I will criticize those that were wrong. I have ducked NONE of your questions but simply repudiated your false rhetoric. I am sorry that you can't accept the truth of the statement, but facts only confuse liberals...Have a nice day
HowardOfOz3565 2 years ago
Hey, I didn't say Saddam Hussein was an angel. What I'm saying is other terrorists groups (like Al Qaeda) didn't like him neither did Iran.
Speaking of that tape, what good is it since it turnes out he never had a nuclear weapons program or weapons of mass destruction?
dancharter 2 years ago
"Hussein has... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." (Albright 11/10/99)
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." (Gore 9/23/2002)
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." (Kennedy, 9/27/02)
"[Saddam] will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." (Sandy Berger, 2/18/1998)
ncdave4life 2 years ago
dancharter, do you actually believe that Saddam and his nuclear scientists were play-acting on those tapes, where they discussed the progress of his nuclear weapons development program? And do you believe that those Kurds and Iranians just pretended to be gassed? Do you believe the Marsh Arabs slaughtered themselves? Do you think Israel goofed when they destroyed his nuclear reactor?
Do you think Clinton, Pelosi, Berger, Albright, Kennedy, Gore, etc., all LIED when they warned of Saddams WMDs?
ncdave4life 2 years ago
ncdave4life, lying is a harsh word to use, What I can tell you is that they misled us about Saddam and his nuclear program. In other words, they were wrong. Second, I'm not accusing of Saddam Hussein of play-acting of those tapes. Look the bottom line is, both parties of government did not like Saddam Hussein so they decided to overthrow him power at any cost.
Speaking of Kurds and Iranians being gassed, how do you think Saddam got of hold of those chemical weapons? From us.
dancharter 2 years ago
Guess what?...they were all wrong, I will hold them accountable with their false information about Hussein.
BTW, those WMD that used during the Iran-Iraq conflict, guess who sold it to him? This shouldn't be a hard answer.
dancharter 2 years ago
If that's true, then how did 550 tons of Iraqi yellow cake uranium end up in Canada?????
HowardOfOz3565 2 years ago
Facts are irrelevant to most liberals, Howard.
I'll bet Dan in unshaken in his acceptance of the claim by Joe Wilson (Mr. Valerie Palme) that Saddam wasn't interested in obtaining yellowcake uranium. I'll bet that 550 tons of uranium has no effect at all on Dan's steadfast acceptance of that discredited claim.
Am I wrong, Dan?
ncdave4life 2 years ago
What always gets me about libs is how easy it is to research and prove them wrong time and again, yet their rabid devotion to their dogma makes it impossible to ever admit they are wrong.
HowardOfOz3565 2 years ago
from MSNBC, July 5th 2008: The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program — a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium — reached a Canadian port Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.
HowardOfOz3565 2 years ago
It appears that you were right, Howard. Like so many liberals, Dan refuses to allow his anti-American opinions to be biased by facts.
First he claimed that Iraq had no WMDs. Now he admits they had WMDs but claims they got 'em from America! He is so sure that the USA is the root of all evil, that he even blames the atrocities of a fervently anti-American genocidal dictator on the USA.
ncdave4life 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well, you forgot to mention 9/11 attacks happened on W.'s watch; He and his officials ignored the briefings of the attacks before it happened. Afterwards, falsfying intel to connect Iraq to 9/11 after you guys won't admit that was a wrong thing to do. Second, I know its a voluteer military but it doesn't excuse the fact why does the right support conflict (where ppl die) and claim to be pro-life? Answer that.
dancharter 2 years ago
Well let's overlook that everything you just said is untrue. what briefing did he "overlook"? the one that said Bin Laden determined to attack US? Now since you're so damn smart, derive 9/11 from that????
HowardOfOz3565 2 years ago 2
You believe a volunteer military fighting a war is a double standard with pro-life??? what tha...
Try explaining to your kids (that you don't abort) why you support abortion on demand, yet oppose the death penalty. There's a double standard.
klim8hokes 2 years ago 2
LOL! first of all, I'm a pro-life liberal. Let's be honest, there's a double standard with both both parties when it comes to pro-life and pro-abortion.
dancharter 2 years ago
Yer a Pro-life Liberal?????
Shhhh.....(you know that's not allowed right?) That would be thinking for yourself and your side frowns on that. When Obama wants your opinion, he'll give it to you. :)
klim8hokes 2 years ago 2
LOL! You have never heard of the term of pro-life democrat? Well I don't need to ask President Obama my opinion, I see things the way I see it
dancharter 2 years ago
How Mr Specter do you explain how you have survived cancer many times?
This is just as pathetic as the 2004 election when John Edwards said Christopher Reeves would walk again if John Kerry were elected. This is something both parties should avoid, it is tasteless.
Monty1994 2 years ago 8
Wow. This creep can't even wait till after the funeral before he starts exploiting Kemp's death.
Enjoy him, Democrats!
LunarKakashi 2 years ago 8
During Republican control of Congress, federal spending on health research and regulation increased 46% after inflation, from $49 billion a year to $72 billion a year, or about 7% increase each year. Thats almost the same rate of increase as Defense spending got in the same period (48%), when we actually had a real war on our hands, and not a political contrivance for excusing federal spending.
LoneStarPatriot 2 years ago 3
What a bitter, angry man.
Democrats! He's all yours now.
jeffwoehrle 2 years ago 7
F-You, Specter.
Don't even reach across the aisle to us -- don't even look at Republicans again.
I hope if you ever try, someone shoots your sorry ass.
You're the Democrats' problem now
ToddonCapeCod 2 years ago 7
Asshole
kemaste 2 years ago 8
Specter can not be serious? My condolences to the Kemp Family for not only the loss of Jack Kemp but the poke in the eye with a sharp stick from Specter. I think we need more money thrown at mental illness now Specter might benefit from that. OMG can he just shut up? All yours Harry.
irisojects 2 years ago 14
Arlen Sphincter = Epic Douche Bag
elvisdaisy 2 years ago 10
Hey Arlen, Thats Jack Kemp's body youre standing on, not a soap box. Get DOwn!
NEOCON23 2 years ago 11
Arlen Specter should STFU!!! Or better yet, maybe he should keep running his disgusting mouth. He represents the Dems now. They can have him!
SkylineTime 2 years ago 10
Who the hell would trust this assclowns views, he might change his (mind) at any freaking moment.
Mrcharliebobo 2 years ago 8