The fine dust in ships holds can become a virtual bomb if a spark ignites it. Apparently very fine dust is more flammable than the coarse, so grain shipments and coal transfers can be potentially very explosive. U wdn't think wheat or flour cd cause a big explosion/fire. It's surprising how flammable airborne dust can be. If it was 'inflammable' dust, that means it wd not burn ie 'inflammable'. Usually something 'inflamed' is swollen not burning. Only 'flammable' substances can burn or explode.
@slessorpr Sorry, that's not true. I refer you to the usage note at the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: "This -in is an intensive prefix derived from the Latin preposition in. This prefix also appears in the word enflame." Flammable and inflammable are synonyms.
@guysmiley00 Thank you guy! I depend on other YT ppl to correct me, as you have, and I want you to know I appreciate yr input. The 'flammable' /'inflammable' conundrum is but one example of the 'knots' one can become tied up in, tinkering with the semantics of the language. That these opposite sounding words mean the same thing is crazy isn't it? I wd have thought a thing was either one or the other, 'able to be burned' or 'not able to be burned', but not both. Synonyms!! Indeed, a paradox!!
@slessorpr No problem - it's a very weird little twist of English, which is itself one of the weirdest languages on the face of the earth. I recall hearing that students of language find only Japanese to be as difficult to learn as English.
And might I add how impressed I am at your ability to take correction without feeling personally attacked. It seems to be a very rare talent in this day and age. Thank you for your civility, it is both welcome and refreshing.
Thank you, Tony for showing how hard the common people have always and always will work to make life pleasant for others.
InnannasRainbow1 1 month ago
I think I have a CUNNING plan!!! ;)
TheDrtomz 1 month ago
Gah, let's get a not Baldrick to do this all :P
instante101 3 months ago
i would never ever ever do this
xraidedlok 6 months ago
Man, Tony's somethin' else. I'm not afraid of heights and I don't know if I could do it so well at all.
jeffdeanable 9 months ago
that old man is in one good shape i tell you.
TheIcelandicPatriot 1 year ago 8
Considering that Tony's afraid of heights, I think he's amazingly brave for doing this.
PollyJuice 1 year ago 8
the quality unfortunately is terrible, practically make it unintelligible.
puzokutya 1 year ago
@puzokutya
No, thats just how all british people speak.
AnonTbomb 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@puzokutya what are you talking about?
xraidedlok 6 months ago
4:27
dodico20 2 years ago
sounds like he came 2:58
GPunktmod 2 years ago
LMAO
imagine if we still used this technology till this day.
This would be the best show of heroics of all time
I couldn't even imagine some guy using that ladder device to save 2 young children
dodico20 2 years ago
So this is where the "put a leg up" comes from
ZamfirChannel 2 years ago
ty for uploading this. I love this show.
benoitbabe 2 years ago
So this is where the term "Hook and Ladder" came from!
Bullettube 2 years ago
The fine dust in ships holds can become a virtual bomb if a spark ignites it. Apparently very fine dust is more flammable than the coarse, so grain shipments and coal transfers can be potentially very explosive. U wdn't think wheat or flour cd cause a big explosion/fire. It's surprising how flammable airborne dust can be. If it was 'inflammable' dust, that means it wd not burn ie 'inflammable'. Usually something 'inflamed' is swollen not burning. Only 'flammable' substances can burn or explode.
slessorpr 2 years ago
@slessorpr Sorry, that's not true. I refer you to the usage note at the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: "This -in is an intensive prefix derived from the Latin preposition in. This prefix also appears in the word enflame." Flammable and inflammable are synonyms.
guysmiley00 1 year ago
@guysmiley00 Thank you guy! I depend on other YT ppl to correct me, as you have, and I want you to know I appreciate yr input. The 'flammable' /'inflammable' conundrum is but one example of the 'knots' one can become tied up in, tinkering with the semantics of the language. That these opposite sounding words mean the same thing is crazy isn't it? I wd have thought a thing was either one or the other, 'able to be burned' or 'not able to be burned', but not both. Synonyms!! Indeed, a paradox!!
slessorpr 1 year ago
@slessorpr No problem - it's a very weird little twist of English, which is itself one of the weirdest languages on the face of the earth. I recall hearing that students of language find only Japanese to be as difficult to learn as English.
And might I add how impressed I am at your ability to take correction without feeling personally attacked. It seems to be a very rare talent in this day and age. Thank you for your civility, it is both welcome and refreshing.
guysmiley00 1 year ago 3
Thanks a lot! I love these.
Is it just on my end or are parts in the middle of it broken/missing?
aptomten 2 years ago