CHURCHILL IS AN EVIL FUCKING CUNT & WAR CRIMINAL THAT ORDERED THE BOMBING & GENOCIDE OF OVER 500,000 German Children, Women, Men, Elderly & even all the animals in DRESDEN!
He was a racist asshole. A fat anti-communist fuck. He spoke for imperialism, and should have been shot in the head. All you who defend him, should get shot with him. Imperialism, neo-colonialism besides Capitalism is one of the biggest enemies of society, and humanity. Think about it, England compared to Cuba. England has as much as it has, because of their thievery.
He was good for the British moral. He shouldn't have meddled into military affairs as much as he did though, or quite a few lives might have been saved in North Africa and Crete. Many leaders make the mistake.. including, of course, his old nemesis on the continent.
My great aunt was crowned queen of the state of New York (long story) but she had 3.6 million votes in her favor. After this she got a congratz telegram from Winsten Churchil.
the true speech, we shall take more land of the world we shall rape more of the world resource's, we will enslave more black ppl, we will change history because we can and make the nazis more evil than us(even tho we killed more ppl then them).
We don't like the Nazis because they got more weapons than us, we the only ones who should have weapons
@WritingTitan He was trolling in another video, I just casually found him also in this one, that's why I said little troll. It was sort of funny to see another post of him.
@CVC2007 yeah i understand why you couldve been fooled. There are soo many profoundly stupid people on the internet today its hard to distinguish them from the trolls
@mohammedisapedo "We shall enslave black people", "We shall change history", "we shall make the nazis more evil than us, even though we killed more people than them"- Are you for real? You really think that Britain did all of this? Killed more people than the nazis, oh my god, you are totally full of crap. Look son, go and do some research, yeah? In fact, get out a history book, look up WW2, and you'll find the part where it says how the Nazis slaughtered 7 MILLION people, and tortured POWs.
Volume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population,” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population.
I want to kill all Jews > Harder than expected > Use as many for hard labour, kill them. > Do whatever with them > Oh, we're losing > Let them join army, we need more troops > If we win, attempt #2 > enslave Asians, and everyone else > Master race in charge. > Empire established? Attempt #3.
the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors from the camps were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945 broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff).
In all its 1,600 pages the report does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of planned extermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. So far as the genuine mortality rate is concerned,
Many Jews that served were decorated with the Knight Cross....if Hitler wanted them to be killed..he wouldn't have decorated them (any of them period) YET he gave them medals for their service. Look up about the Free Arabia Korps and the Indians as well...look what they were fighting for with Hitler. Nationalism and to fight against Communism
You don't fully know why he wanted Japan. Japan accepted Nationalism and was anti-Communism unlike China which was Communist.
Hitler hated Communism. Stalin provided his people with nothing. Hitler provided his people with jobs; giving people the Volkswagen; creating the Autobahn which basically gave us the 4 lane highways we have today. He even honored Henry Ford for his creation of his vehicles and gave him a medal.
@1WildlandFirefighter Again, you're completely missing the point. I'm using your own argument.
If Hitler want Japan, he wouldn't have allied with them. This is your logic that you've used for the Jews. Regardless of the reason. Hitler showered Japan with gifts and compliments, and you MUST know his plans for Japan.
Don't fully know why? Are you kidding me?
America gets in other peoples business, woopdie fuckin' doo. You act like its something new in world history.
@1WildlandFirefighter And hopefully, you know keeping someone, something, or some nation around doesn't mean keeping them around forever. Hitler and Stalin had an agreement, were they friends for long?
It's called "Getting someone to help you, and get rid of them later". It's been repeated ALL throughout history, yet you are completely looking over this, as if its never been seen. For "America is evil because they meddle with internal affairs with other countries?".
October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable. In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis-occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews.
The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78).
Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945. In March, 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp...” (Vol. III, p. 83). Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able.
One of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps towards the end of the war. Says the Report: “In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims
It is a remarkable fact, however, that well into the war period, the Germans continued to implement the policy of Jewish emigration. The fall of France in 1940 enabled the German Government to open serious negotiations with the French for the transfer of European Jews to Madagascar. A memorandum of August, 1942 from Luther, Secretary-of-State in the German Foreign Office, reveals that he had conducted these negotiations between July and December, 1940, when they were terminated by the French
Moreover, there had been no such evidence or declaration of disloyalty by these Japanese Americans as had been given by Weizmann. The British, too, during the Boer War, interned all the women and children of the population, and thousands had died as a result, yet in no sense could the British be charged with wanting to exterminate the Boers. The detention of Jews in the occupied territories of Europe served two essential purposes from the German viewpoint
All Jews had thus been declared agents willing to prosecute a war against the German Reich, and as a consequence, Himmler and Heydrich were eventually to begin the policy of internment. It is worth noting that the United States and Canada had already interned all Japanese aliens and citizens of Japanese descent in detention camps before the Germans applied the same security measures against the Jews of Europe.
Chaim Weizmann, the principle Zionist leader, had declared war against Germany on behalf of the world’s Jews, stating that “the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies... The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources etc... ” (Jewish Chronicle, September 8, 1939
With the coming of the war, the situation regarding the Jews altered drastically. It is not widely known that world Jewry declared itself to be a belligerent party in the Second World War, and there was therefore ample basis under international law for the Germans to intern the Jewish population as a hostile force. On September 5, 1939,
Замечательный человек,Великан британской и мировой истории,великий англичанин.Те.кто его называют уродливым-подлецы.Хотя он по копмлекции-полный,но у него взгляд и лицо,достойное КИСТИ Рембрандта."Умнее человека не встречал"-слова Сталина маршалу Голованову.***
@BonnBerlinerVI BBC article: By the end of 1947, around 250,000 German POWs had been repatriated, but 24,000 decided to stay in Britain. Hans Siegfried Vallentin was one of these. Like many of the others, he'd been a keen supporter of Hitler. He'd even lied about his age to get into the Luftwaffe. He was only 17 when he was shot down and taken prisoner. But now, three years later, he didn't want to go back home.
@1WildlandFirefighter So... you expect adjacent nations to stand by and watch whilst their neighbors are annihilated by the Nazi uprising? Do you really think that Hitler would have stopped after conquering Europe? Bull shit! He wanted the world to be dominated by Nazi rule. America and especially Britain had a moral obligation to enter the war.
@jackmitch14 le facts. You only know what they told you in school.
Look up Hitler speech that they don't want you to hear on Youtube. Hitler didn't want war with Britian or America but the Allied powers pushed it. The Poles were killing Germans in the Sudentland (Once was Germany before the Allies took it from the Germans after WW1)- This left Germans in what the Allied powers made into Poland.
Hitlers main goal was to get rid of Communism and establish Nationalism for every country.
@1WildlandFirefighter Even if what you are saying is true, at the end of the day, you cannot deny what the Nazis did to people in the second world war. Torture, humiliation and of course killing were all common place in German concentration camps. And you'll find that the reason for why part of Germany was made into Poland was because it was essentially Germany's fault for causing WW1 in the first place.As punishment for this, it was decided that Germany should give up land.
alive but they used them for work. The Allies used Germans and Japanese for work too.
The Allies wanted to shame Germany since WW1...they didn't want them to have a military which was a slap in the face.
How would you like if someone told America to not have a military.....bet you wouldn't like that would you? People died in camps. I thought it was "6 million" Jews that died. Shit, they had "4 million" labeled before..I don't they know what they are tlkin bout
@1WildlandFirefighter People change the figures all the time. Whoever said that 4 million Jews were killed obviously got their estimates wrong. But so what, they made a mistake, there was no sure fire way of telling how many were killed. It's like when a disaster happens and people are killed, the media gives an estimate but they later change it when they know more about what's happened. That's exactly what its like with the Holocaust, people weren't sure how many died exactly.
I bet you didn;t know Hitler allied with other nationalities (Races) SUCH as that in India. The Indians wanted to revolt against the British who ruled their country and Hitler helped them so they could establish a Nationalist Indian government without foreign rule.
Hitler did this with many other Nations and also to help eliminate the Communist who were ruling and gaining more territory which you still see today.
Hitler was making Germany a booming economic powerhouse while the rest of the world dealted with the Great Depression. Hitler pulled Germany out of it just like that EVEN when they had to pay back war debts from WW1. So the Allieds pushed to make a war so it could access them (and tell people they have a reason for war) to resources and land.
@1WildlandFirefighter Yes, Hitler may have fixed Germany's economy, gave people jobs and improved the quality of life for many Germans, but his rule did also prove a substantial threat to other countries in Europe, and of course to the Allies. In fact, you'll find that soon after Germany invaded Poland, the Allies actually gave Hitler a chance to reverse what he had done. They told him to pull German soldiers of the Polish streets or a state of war would exist between them. This was ignored
The British empire is evil and needed to be punished. So does America and their crimes they commited...OH wait; that's right. America and Britian are always right; they are always good. HA bullshit Sherlock.
@1WildlandFirefighter Oh really? Please, continue to enlighten us with your knowledge. Do tell us how America and Britain compare to Hitler. Yes, please tell us how they wanted to enslave every population who were not "Aryan", or attempt Genocide on an entire group of people.
Yes, and how they also executed an ethnic group with furnaces, or attempted global domination in one lifetime.
Right, do tell us how TYRANNICAL Britain and America are.
Do you know how the Americans killed innocent Indians; moved them in reservations; and nearly wiped out the whole Indian population while moving across the Western frontier? The Confederate States of America was trying to help these Indians as well; if you do not know; but the Union won the war and pushed the Indians into reservations (what was left of them)
Do you even know that Jewish people served in the Nazi Military? Search up "Hitler's Jewish Soldiers". Think for a moment; IF you even have a brain to think: if Hitler wanted to exterminate every Jew like people say...HE WOULDN'T HAVE THEM JOIN HIS MILITARY.
Do you know what Typhoid is? This is the disease that plague the camps in Europe; USSR; and else where in the world that killed alot of people- EVEN GERMANS IN SOVIET POW camps.
Typhoid can be trasmitted from person to person and if a person dies from it (especially alot of people); you have to either bury ot burn their bodies. They don't ths in Europe during the Black Plague which killed alot of Europeans.
Many other diseases were spread throughout the camps & they used pesticides to delouse their clothes and people (Zyklon B). Do me a favor & study in depth more about it if you don't believe me...I doubt you do and I doubt you will search the truth.
@1WildlandFirefighter They didn't burn the bodies. They executed by burning. There is a huge, huge difference.
Otherwise, they wouldn't have mountain pile of bodies lying there, without burning them or burying. THey were only buried AFTER liberation of the camps.
Yes, and also your whole "BRITISH RULE" thing, they've relinquished their rule in EVERY COUNTRY they had control over.
Hong Kong in 1996, Canada, Australia most noted. They are now known as "The Commonwealth".
@1WildlandFirefighter Cute, you realize even the soldiers stationed at the camps freely admitted they were very much alive while being burned in a furnace. They didn't waste time waiting for people to die to burn.
What does british rule in India have to do with anything? Were they under a Tyranical dictatorship?
No, they were simply another Colony. The Indians simply wanted their OWN soverignty, and this was a good opportunity.
@1WildlandFirefighter Once again, it seems all too convienient that you use the outbreak of disease as the reason for why so many died in concentration camps in WW2. Whatever the Allies may have done during world war two, it was nowhere near as bad as what Hitler did. Atrocities were commited by BOTH sides, but what Hitler did, was truly horiific, and the fact that you are denying it, quite frankly disgusts me. 6-7 MILLION jews were killed in concentration camps right across Germany.
@1WildlandFirefighter The country that you say America used nuclear bombs on is Japan, presumably. Well, might I bring to your attention that Japan attacked America first, I mean of course the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbour. The USA had done nothing to provoke Japan into doing this, meaning it was an unprovoked attack. Thousands died in Pearl Harbour, so what do you expect America to do? They RETALIATED. BTW, they did give the Japanese a warning before hand about the nukes.
See, you don't know history and your trying to tell me you know this and that.
Japan had a reason to attack America.
Japan was getting oil and steel from America. Japan and China were battling with each other before WW2. America was allies with China and Japan. Japan was helping the Allies during WW1. Well America wanted to keep China as its Allies due to resources that China had. Japan didn't have alot of resources for it's growing population.
There has always been a conflict between China and Japan so Japan went to China to get resources and China was a Communist country as well.
Well America didn't like Japan fighting China so they put an embargo on Japan...this would destroy Japan's economy and possibly make them lose alot of lives. So Japan had to somehow still get oil and steel..but America was in it's way since it did the embargo..thus they attacked Pearl Harbor. If America didn't do the embargo
If Hitler wanted to kill all Jews...he sure as hell wouldn't have let them join his military like he did. Many were Generals. MANY WERE AWARDED MEDALS!
And if was such a "horrific" incident....the Jews wouldn't be asking donations for it still today.
@1WildlandFirefighter Well then please explain to me how 6 million Jews died during WW2, and how, many Nazis actually spoke of their hatred for the Jewish population, and even wanted the Jews killed. Also, Hitler was never shy about admitting his hatred for the Jews, yes, he may have awarded them medals but maybe that's because they did a service that was of benefit for the country, and so, Hitler liked them for that. At the end of the day though, the Holocaust did happen. Jews were killed.
People say he wanted to exterminate them. Well like I said..if he wanted to "exterminate" them then he wouldn't have let them join the SS, Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe, Kriegsmarine, etc
You know you always hear about the "Holocaust" yet no one talks about the murdering that the Soviet union did in Eastern Europe...like HOLODOMOR and many more that occured.
Many Russians and Eastern Europeans saw Hitler and his military as saviours from the evil Communist regime.
@1WildlandFirefighter Oh god, you're still here. Do you have a problem measuring atrocities?
A week ago you were telling me how the U.S being involved in foriegn affairs was worse than the holocaust. Now you've changed it back to the Soviet Union.
What is the difference between the man-made famine of the Soviet Union, and the Holocaust?
@1WildlandFirefighter Oh how convienient. Yes, that's right, blame the slaughter of SEVEN MILLION PEOPLE on some disease! The only reason people caught that disease was because of the awful conditions that they were kept in! People were starved and tortured and you know full well that that is no lie, so stop trying to make out as if nothing happened and that the Nazis are innocent because that is the one thing that they aren't- innocent! Would you deny what happened in those camps, hmm?
Britian occupied and rule many countries and still does today..so does America and most of the Superpowers today.
During WW2, Many Indians from India made a revolution against the British that occupied and rule their country so they allied with Hitler to establish Nationalism in India.
During the Iran Hostage Crisis during President Jimmy Carter's rule..the Iranian college students that held the Hostages were trying to do a revolution like the Indians.
@1WildlandFirefighter ......Ahaha, I don't think you understand - you're bringing in different timelines into the fray. Please, tell me how America and Britain were "EVIL" during WWII.
In the 20th century...
Compared to Hitler.
Yes, sure they EACH had their historical fallacies.
But let me address your "Jew Soldier".
"Elminitating the Jews were more difficult than I thought." they were considered "HALF JEWS". Used to bolster the high casualties.
Look up about the Allied actrocities during WW2. Such as America being the only country to ever use a Nuclear weapon on people (civilains at that of Japan).
@1WildlandFirefighter They also dropped leaflets telling the Japanese to leave the cities because they will level them. They of course, know they wouldn't listen, nor look at them, but dropped it anyway.
But that isn't the point, you're trying to tell me there were atrocities. There were obviously atrocities on both sides.
I'm asking you to compare them, and tell me what is worse. Genocide, world domination, and slavery or two bombs and the end of a war.
How is it just 6 million? Before the camp had 4 million mentioned then years passed and they added 2 million more. The World Almanac of 1938 gives the number of Jews in the world as 16,588,259. But after the war, the New York Times, February 22nd, 1948 placed the number of Jews in the world at a minimum of 15,600,000 and a maximum of 18,700,000
@1WildlandFirefighter Lastly, "they could have settled it peacefully". Right, just like how they tried to settle it peacefully by appeasing Hitler BEFORE the war.
The fact is, the Emperor of Japan wanted to surrender, but his soldiers wouldn't let him. Regardless, they dropped nuclear weapons for a) To see the damage b) To end the war.
Still, Nuclear fallout was not a known thing, nuclear radiation was also not a known thing and was an unpredicted aftermath.
Look up "Hitlers speech they do not want you to hear". Hitler says he wanted peace but America pushed for war. Hitler didn't want war with Britian but Britian declared it. Hitler's officer mentioned this on a video many years after the war here on Youtube. Hitler saw Britian as he saw Germany (the people).
@KingR3aper Quite obviously, these figures make it impossible for the number of Jewish war-time casualties to be measured in anything but thousands. 15–1/2 million in 1938 minus the alleged six million leaves nine million; the New York Times figures would mean, therefore, that the world’s Jews produced seven million births, almost doubling their numbers, in the space of ten years.
@KingR3aper This is patently ridiculous. It would appear, therefore, that the great majority of the missing “six million” were in fact emigrants—emigrants to European countries, to the Soviet Union and the United States before, during and after the war. And emigrants also, in vast numbers to Palestine during and especially at the end of the war
@KingR3aper After 1945, boat-loads of these Jewish survivors entered Palestine illegally from Europe, causing considerable embarrassment to the British Government of the time; indeed, so great were the numbers that the H. M. Stationery Office publication No. 190 (November 5th, 1946) described them as “almost amounting to a second Exodus.”
@KingR3aper It was these emigrants to all parts of the world who had swollen the world Jewish population to between 15 and 18 millions by 1948, and probably the greatest part of them were emigrants to the United States who entered in violation of the quota laws
Many of Japans soldiers didn't have contact with the Emperor. The Japanese were honorable people and didn't want to die a loser. This is shown throughout their history way before WW2.
The Allies knew about Nuclear radiation...Germany was also working on nuclear weapons before as well.
Jews were going to be shipped off by Hitler but no country including the USA wanted them. They kept them in POW camps. 150,000+ Jews joined the Wehrmacht, SS, Luftwaffe..and Hitler knew. If he wanted to exterminate EVERY JEW LIKE YOU AND OTHERS SAY...WHY DID HE LET THEM JOIN HIS MILITARY!?!? Don't say they were "PART JEW". Many Jews and half Jews joined. A Jew is a Jew. Jews are suppose to not marry Gentiles (THIS IS IN THE TORAH)
@1WildlandFirefighter :P So basically, what you are saying - the allies were far more evil, because they refused to take Jews that Hitler was trying to force away. So its THEIR fault, 6 million Jews were killed, right?
Just like how a woman gets raped, its her fault for getting raped?
Like I said, they were losing troops exponentially. Jews, regardless "Half Jew" or not, they were used to bolster the Army.
But if you said Hitler was trying to exterminate all Jews like we were taught in school. Why would he let them join? He suppose to not like Jews even to let them join his military.
The Iranian students didn't want foreigns to get involved in their internal affairs of their own country...they especially didn't want the Soviets there either since the Communist were of a "Athiestic Government". The Iranians saw that the British; French; Soviets; and Americans were invading their country and trying to rule it.
Would you want a foreign country to come in your country and telling your people how to run it? No you wouldn't and if you did your a complete dumbass.
@1WildlandFirefighter lol, you're adorable. What does Stalin have to do with the British and American side of things?
I believe you said "America and Britain are more EVIL". I'm asking you to tell me how, and the best you can come up with is "They have Colonies and were in other countries"?
....Woopdie fuck. So was Hitler? Poland? Invaded Belgium? France?
And that wasn't even close to the WORST thing he did.
You just don't understand. Do you know why most of the people allied with Hitler? To rule their own country and to stop the invasion of Communism that was taken place.
Stalin killed millions of murders YET Britian nor America did anything about it AND THEY WERE ALLIES WITH THEM!
Americans and British did the bombing of Dresden that created a firestorm that wiped more people out than the bombing of Britian. Plus not to mention the first country (USA) to be the only
@KingR3aper country to use a nuclear weapon on civilians.
Hitler invaded Poland because the Polish people in the part of Poland that was once Germany before WW2 was killing Germans left in that part and Hitler saw that part of Germany was stolen from them and wanted it back. If America lost a war; no one took a part of their land same goes for Britian.
@victoneter See, when comparing speeches made in real life and speeches made on a video game, I have to say, the speeches made in real life are better. Just like Churchill's. You may not like him, but if you think that a speech that was made on a video game is better than a speech made in real life, then you are slightly deluded. No offence, I'm just saying.
@islandinthesea Well you're right. The issues in real life speeches actually matter and are relevant while in a video game or in a movie they're not, but the difference is that this speech doesn't give me the chills as much as the one in Gears of War. My comment earlier was more like a joke anyway.
Churchill was a fantastic leader! He got us through the storm that is war and he did it well. I've gotta admit, he is an inspiration, despite what many haters say.
On your own asertions, it will also make Italians (the roman empire) your superior, for it was they showed the island monkey how to shit in a channel, you are so deluded.
America,yet governed by retarted apes are your master, such a privilege for the ousted no-bodies of this European continent, so best of luck for you.
All BBC is lies and a joke of Europe, yet how will you know it.I will make example after example, yet why the problem.... ; ) monkey...
@BonnBerlinerVI How is America Britain's master? I mean, lets not forget how just 300 years ago, America was ruled by Britain. In fact, lets not forget how Britain had the largest empire in human history, if we were apes, we would not have been able to do that. And no,we didn't just "get lucky". Well, you may call me an "island monkey" but at least I know that many of history's great scientists, philosophers and of course, inventions came from this island. So fuck you, Britain hating trash!
@islandinthesea Without the US, the war could not have defeated Nazi Germany, except maybe the USSR. And even in that instance the war would have been longer and deadlier
@islandinthesea Great Britain didn't have the capability to manufacture everything it needed, her factories were being destroyed by the Luftwaffe,and even at 100% their manufacturing base was only a fraction of the American capacity.Even the Soviet Union,the largest nation in the world, imported millions tons of supplies each year through 1945.Did Britain have an incredible will to fight?yes. But did they need American aid to do so?yes to that too
@islandinthesea Great Britain needed American manufactured goods to fight the war and protect her people. And last I checked we did fight Japan in WW II...
@areallygoodshoe Yes, I suppose we did fight Japan didn't we? Just not as much as Germany. And although, yes, Britain did need some US manufactured goods, I'd imagine that the majority of the goods would have been made right here in Britain, as it was much easier to do so. Why bother with crate loads of goods from the US when you can make the same stuff right here in Britain at a much cheaper price?
@HaiLsKuNkY Im not saying that Britain would have been destroyed, Just that they didnt have the resources to defeat Germany on her own. From 1937 on US aid was provided to not only Britain but even the USSR. The United States had by far the strongest manufacturing base at the time
lol @butthurt Brits desperately trying to pretend they're something they're not while they talk like Americans, watch American TV, listen to American music, fight in American wars (not very well, which is why we have to finish every fucking thing they start) and are basically our little lapdog in every way imaginable. Then they come across the water and talk about a "special relationship" (LOL) like a fucking playground weakling and try and act like they're American and not European.
@TheJay9002 what language are you using? Where are the Beatles from? Where are most of the best bands in the world from? American TV - X factor is created by an Englishman. As was American Idol. The British have been in the Middle East since they gave Palestine away - Since we conquered it. You're British really.
@TheJay9002 HAHAHAHA!!! We try to talk like Americans, just remember whose language you are speaking! Which country controlled half the world, which country made the first real computer, which country made the first tank, jet engine and locomotive.Sir Isac Newton, whom without civilasation would be at leat 100 years behind it's current development, was British, William Shakespere was British the list goes on. But do not forget there would be no America without England!
@tomwaters7 Well said mate you couldve thrown penicillin television mr dunlop tarmac roads I dont detract from what the USA done during ww2 . But they have got a tendancy to piss us off slagging monty off constantly duz it for me especially when they had numpteys like patton and bradley
@tomwaters7 Yeah who's country gave the Jews Palestine and has fucked up the middle east because of it. Who's country let India split into 3 separate countries giving birth to Pakistan which is a terrorist state. Not to speak of all the killing that has gone on in the name of the crown. So shut up and stop believing everything Jeremy Clarkson says in his stupid documentary's. Also England invented a few things but the computer wasn't one of them, dumb ass!
@deluxsound123 Let me tell you why India split into three different countries, because you clearly don't know why; Before the partition of Pakistan from India, there was a lot of fighting between Muslims and Hindus. So when the British left India, it was decided that in order to stop the fighting, there had to be a place where Muslims could live without Hindus, ensuring peace.So, the new state of Pakistan was formed, and is where many Muslims then went to after its creation in the 1940s.
@deluxsound123 Oh and we didn't give the Jews Palestine, we controlled it and that whole general area, but we never just handed it over to the Jews. And yes, England didn't invent the computer, but we did invent the light bulb, the jet engine, the telephone, etc... And the context in which you said documentaries is wrong. If you're talking about one documentary e.g. "The documentary's really helpful" then you put the apostrophe in, when talking about more than one, you leave the apostrophe out.
@deluxsound123 NO A BRITISH MAN DEVELOPED AND MADE THE FIRST COMPUTER, his name was Tommy Flower and his computer helped defeat the Germans. It wasn't until later that any american replicated a similiar computer with no moving parts. SO YOU ARE A DUMBASS! Britain shaped the world as you know it, and you have to admit that without England there would be no America. Also we gave India and such countries stable governments among with things like currency etc. And do we even need to mention VIETNAM!
YOU ARE A FUCKING RETARD! Brits listening to Yanks music? Have you ever heard of The Beatles? Led Zeppelin? Rolling Stone! Fight in American Wars? That's because WERE FUCKING ALLIES YOU DAFT CUNT! Britain is America's lapdog? I've never in my life EVER witnessed a Brit speaking like or spelling like a yank. Pretending/ wishing to be one. Why would we want to be the most retarded, inbred, most hated nationality on the earth? I'm pretty sure you have to be the STUPIDEST PERSON ALIVE!
@TheJay9002 If you believe what you are saying (WHICH IS COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY UNTRUE) If only Yanks would stop fucking their sisters and cousins they'd have less retards roaming the earth (AKA you!) Have you heard of the Beatles? Led Zeppelin? Go read a book and spell COLOUR right you fucking inbred! Also, if you have this hate towards Britain so much, give Canada back Alaska and stop watching CHURCHILL VIDS YOU STUPID MOTHER FUCKER
@islandinthesea Rest of the world will think so, island monkey, ignorance is your only defence, as for sure your opinion is fed by your isolated media, bahahha,
@BonnBerlinerVI "Island monkey" ha, your comments are as pathetic as the country from which you are from. Oh and ignorance isn't our "only defence", because if it was then we'd be long gone, and yet, we are still here and will never go away! The reason being a very simple one, we have the best special ops team in the world! And this special ops team along with our extremely well trained soldiers, our the defenders of this island.And my country's media is not "isolated" as you so stupidly claim!
@BonnBerlinerVI BTW, every time you have a go at Britain, just remember that the language you are speaking is actually from Britain, and not the country that your from. Also, my country's media is hardly "isolated", because you'll find that channels such as the BBC are global. Still based in Great Britain, but shown in other countries, oh and also we invented TV, and most other media items you see around you today. So, you're not only speaking MY language but also using tech made in MY country!
@BonnBerlinerVI I'd hardly call a nation that had the largest empire in history, discovered entire continents and set up colonies on newly discovered lands a "lapdog", and that it just "copies America all the time", because lets not forget, less than 300 years ago, America was ruled by Britain, so if anything, America is the lapdog because they speak Britain's language, use Britain's technology and have the same traditions that we here in Britain have! And that is no denying that!
Dont try and persuade the ignorant. Dont trust the stigma of the ignorant and believe that is all of our opinions. Just back away from the ignorant, no matter what country they are from they will only embaress us all.
@islandinthesea Always the same, speak of the english dire situation and they speak of an extinct empire. The Turks had a great empire, look at it now, yet at the very least they did not steal land from primitive tribes in Australia, Africa and Americas, really no one is admiring that sort of empire.
Remember the english had no empire, only the wealthy elite, the rest of you all, treated worse than slaves, that is undeniable.
@BonnBerlinerVI Are you that retarded? It wasn't the English who had the Empire- it was the British! Do you not know the difference between England and Britain? You stupid hairy ape!! And of course we had an empire! How can you say that we didn't? It's even in EVERY SINGLE history book you can find, and they all say the same thing, a small island called Britain controlled a THIRD OF THE PLANET- yes that's right- A THIRD OF THE PLANET- now that is undeniable!
@BonnBerlinerVI And when you talk of the Turks empire, you say how at least that empire never stole land of primitive tribes! Well let me tell you this- at least the British Empire never practised genocide! The Ottoman empire did! Of course being the ignorant twat that you are, you will deny this and make up something bad about the British empire, which will prove to be false! The British Empire was great, the Ottoman was not! Britain is also great, that's why it is called GREAT Britain!!!
@islandinthesea I think you find you are wrong. The british are no exception. Every major empire have committed Genocide of some kind. The British in Ireland for example. The potato famine only effected potato. The british could have give some of the food to lessen the problem but they didn't. Its not direct genocide but it is still genocide. It wiped out half of ireland's popluation. A famine in India between 1876 and 1908, the british establisment caused over 12-33 million deaths.
@Tomas21052 I detect a certain double standard here. Ireland were part of the United Kingdom at this time, so was it responsible (in part) for the famine in India too?
@speedyonehundred Ireland was invaded and governed by the force of england, so also the Irish are responible for India ?..., do any one believe this shit...it is ridiculous to the very core, rational is a scare quality on england.
@islandinthesea and also the british goverment were the first to use concertation camps in the boer wars. Did you also know Hilter's favourate film was the bengal tiger. A film about british policy in india.
@Tomas21052 Yes, and the Americans have used concentration camps too. But in both cases they weren't murder camps, although some 10,000 people died of disease and starvation in the UK camps after supply failures, leading to an outcry back in England.
@speedyonehundred Over one million staved or died of diseases in the allied death camps, German soldiers that had surrendered had as well to be shot as this.
@BonnBerlinerVI If this is true, and I very much doubt it based on your messages on this site (which are very bitter at the very least), then it didn't happen at the hands of the British. Many german POWs settled in Britain after the war. They were treated under the Geneva Convention.
@speedyonehundred Agreed, the allied death camps were run by your master, the Americans but none the less the english were happy with this.
For German POWs living in england, ahhha, that is ridiculous. The english have a problem with all nations to this very moment. Will any one imagine a German soldier living in england post-war.
@BonnBerlinerVI The US abided by the Geneve Convention. Also see this BBC article extract: "By the end of 1947, around 250,000 German POWs had been repatriated, but 24,000 decided to stay in Britain. Hans Siegfried Vallentin was one of these. Like many of the others, he'd been a keen supporter of Hitler. He'd even lied about his age to get into the Luftwaffe. He was only 17 when he was shot down and taken prisoner. But now, three years later, he didn't want to go back home."
@islandinth Also winston churchill send over to ireland crimials, ex-soldiers to go and murder lrish people. Thousands were killed by the Black and tans. No Genocide ever practised by the british establisment? Ithink i have proved my point
@Tomas21052 And of course there were only two countries whose leaders commiserated the Germans on the death of Hitler - one was its ally Italy, and the other was Ireland.
@TheJay9002 HA! Please, we're the lapdogs? Let's just see for a moment-who's language are you speaking? Britain's! Who gave you idiots television in the first place?- The British! Oh and,YOU keep asking US for help every time you get involved in some overseas conflict! Also, we have the best special ops team in the world, how can you say that we don't fight in wars very well? We used to rule the waves, had the largest empire in history and you think that we aren't very good at fighting in wars?
@TheJay9002 And actually, we don't act like we're American or European, we act like we're British! Cos that's what we are! Why the hell would we rather act like we're American? That's just stupid. Then again, it's typical of an American to think that, because you lot think that you're the best, that everybody wants to be like you, when in actual fact they don't! Oh and at least we here in Britain have diversity and are never too far away from learning an interesting language!
700,000 of indian voulenteer MILITIA fought in north africa for the sake of BRITISH ..... and when he was asked who are those brown people are ...he said there was no such people fighting for us north africa????..... huh.
LOL all this people saying "we". we had nothing to do with this, we didnt land on normandy,fight in stalingrad,fly spitfires over southern england,liberate death camps or see our friends killed next to us. WE should shut the fuck up.
@areallygoodshoe Hitler didn't hate Britain, he liked it, he even spent 6 months living in Liverpool with his brother Alois Hitler. Britain's king Edward VIII was a Nazi sympathizer during the war he was exiled to the Bahamas. Britain defiantly would of survived the war even if we lost, we wouldn't be speaking German either. Britain has strong links with Germans going back to the Anglo Saxons. queen Elizabeth is half German.
@HaiLsKuNkY Yes but because we have "strong links with the Germans", surely that's all the more reason why we should speak German? You see, this is the question that the Nazis would have proposed and is the reason why they would've made us learn and then speak German. And even if they didn't, they would've made us use the same currency as Germany, the Mark, I believe its called. Using the same currency would make things a lot easier, economy and finance wise.
@areallygoodshoe Yes, it could have survived without US aid, because it had the might of the Empire to back it up. And since when did we ever fight Japan in ww2?
CHURCHILL is a fucking WAR CRIMINAL for the HOLOCAUST OF BOMBS DROPPED ON DRESDEN! FUCK the Treaty of Versailles & the FUCKING EVIL ZIONIST ANTI-CHRISTS with their FAKE HOLO-HOAX, just an excuse to INVADE PALESTINE! WHITE POWER for the people of Germany!
@whitechristian1066 YOU ARE A BIG FUCKING RETARD!! HOW THE HELL IS CHURCHILL A WAR CRIMINAL WHEN HITLER GAVE THE ORDER TO KILL EVERY SINGLE JEW IN FUCKING GERMANY??!!
@islandinthesea FUCK OFF you nigger loving communist faggot! The HOLO-HOAX was a FAKE EXCUSE to INVADE Palestine & COMMIT GENOCIDE on the Palestinian Christians! YOU'RE A FUCKING CUNT!
@whitechristian1066 HA! HA! HA! Where did you learn that, some bloody documentary created by apes like yourself? What a load of shit! Every word that you type in to your little computer is nothing but a load of fucking shit! You see, I have a little thing called common sense, which is basically where I don't believe stupid conspiracy theories created by right-wing extremists like yourself. You racist, right-wing, Nazi loving piece of trash!!
@whitechristian1066 Oh do us all a favour and shove your stupid little conspiracy theories up your arse! You RACIST, BIGOTED, NAZI LOVING PIECE OF SCUM!! All you people do is hate and fear anyone who is different to you! "Hate and Fear" that's what you scum bags believe isn't it! Churchill was the best damn leader this country has ever known whilst Hitler was nothing more than some oppressive, genocidal dictator who hated Jews! Oh and BTW, I'm actually a Christian, not a Jew!
This has been flagged as spam show
CHURCHILL IS AN EVIL FUCKING CUNT & WAR CRIMINAL THAT ORDERED THE BOMBING & GENOCIDE OF OVER 500,000 German Children, Women, Men, Elderly & even all the animals in DRESDEN!
whitechristian1066 19 hours ago
He was a racist asshole. A fat anti-communist fuck. He spoke for imperialism, and should have been shot in the head. All you who defend him, should get shot with him. Imperialism, neo-colonialism besides Capitalism is one of the biggest enemies of society, and humanity. Think about it, England compared to Cuba. England has as much as it has, because of their thievery.
chris96kalonji 2 days ago
He was good for the British moral. He shouldn't have meddled into military affairs as much as he did though, or quite a few lives might have been saved in North Africa and Crete. Many leaders make the mistake.. including, of course, his old nemesis on the continent.
Madsen989Y 2 days ago
52 people are Nazis!
islandinthesea 6 days ago
Comment removed
MrDwmeyer 1 week ago
Not as good as Dr Goebbels "Totale Krieg"speech.
pequodman 1 week ago
"we shall fight on the beaches. we shall fight on the landing grounds, in the fields, in the knocking shops..."
LiquorWreckedEmGood 1 week ago
My great aunt was crowned queen of the state of New York (long story) but she had 3.6 million votes in her favor. After this she got a congratz telegram from Winsten Churchil.
Jakethesnake1281 2 weeks ago
the true speech, we shall take more land of the world we shall rape more of the world resource's, we will enslave more black ppl, we will change history because we can and make the nazis more evil than us(even tho we killed more ppl then them).
We don't like the Nazis because they got more weapons than us, we the only ones who should have weapons
mohammedisapedo 3 weeks ago
@mohammedisapedo hello little troll, having fun?
CVC2007 3 weeks ago
@CVC2007 the pressumption of trolling has become too quick nowadays. he genuinely sounds like an ignorant ass to me
WritingTitan 3 weeks ago
@WritingTitan He was trolling in another video, I just casually found him also in this one, that's why I said little troll. It was sort of funny to see another post of him.
But I understand your point.
CVC2007 3 weeks ago
@CVC2007 yeah i understand why you couldve been fooled. There are soo many profoundly stupid people on the internet today its hard to distinguish them from the trolls
WritingTitan 3 weeks ago
@CVC2007 i am thank you, lol you living in your dumb white life
mohammedisapedo 2 weeks ago
@mohammedisapedo WHITE POWER!
Sciophobiaranger 1 week ago
@mohammedisapedo "We shall enslave black people", "We shall change history", "we shall make the nazis more evil than us, even though we killed more people than them"- Are you for real? You really think that Britain did all of this? Killed more people than the nazis, oh my god, you are totally full of crap. Look son, go and do some research, yeah? In fact, get out a history book, look up WW2, and you'll find the part where it says how the Nazis slaughtered 7 MILLION people, and tortured POWs.
islandinthesea 1 week ago
@islandinthesea are you for real, England starved 22million Indians in the great wheat famine.
the english killed countless Africans,native Americans, Australians ect, like i said naxis had nothing on you english thats fact
mohammedisapedo 6 days ago
Volume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population,” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population.
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter Because its LOGICAL, 1widlandFirefighter. Because you don't do it now you can't do it later?
You make people join your Army to fight for you - instead of conscripting your OWN citizens, let people you DON'T LIKE Join your army and DIE.
If you win, KILL THEM AFTERWARDS.
Its EXACTLY what Genghis Khan did to the Northern Chinese.
Does that make SENSE sir? Or are you still around toting how meddling with sovereign nations worse than 6 million deaths?
KingR3aper 3 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter Let me lay it out easier for you.
I want to kill all Jews > Harder than expected > Use as many for hard labour, kill them. > Do whatever with them > Oh, we're losing > Let them join army, we need more troops > If we win, attempt #2 > enslave Asians, and everyone else > Master race in charge. > Empire established? Attempt #3.
KingR3aper 3 weeks ago
the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors from the camps were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945 broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff).
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
In all its 1,600 pages the report does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of planned extermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. So far as the genuine mortality rate is concerned,
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter Also the legend was 11 million.
KingR3aper 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
Many Jews that served were decorated with the Knight Cross....if Hitler wanted them to be killed..he wouldn't have decorated them (any of them period) YET he gave them medals for their service. Look up about the Free Arabia Korps and the Indians as well...look what they were fighting for with Hitler. Nationalism and to fight against Communism
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter If? Sir, that is the weakest argument I've heard to support ANYTHING in your current statement.
That's COMPLETELY under your speculation, what is an IF is not KNOWN.
Having allies doesn't mean you're liked, having allies is a benefit.
"If Hitler hated the Japanese he wouldn't have ALLIED with them." You know the answer, right?
What do you think his plan was for Japan if they won? Please, tell me. It's been written down, by him only.
KingR3aper 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
You don't fully know why he wanted Japan. Japan accepted Nationalism and was anti-Communism unlike China which was Communist.
Hitler hated Communism. Stalin provided his people with nothing. Hitler provided his people with jobs; giving people the Volkswagen; creating the Autobahn which basically gave us the 4 lane highways we have today. He even honored Henry Ford for his creation of his vehicles and gave him a medal.
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
Hitler had a photo of Henry Ford on his desk.
America doesn't want other countries getting into it's business does it? Nope; let it gets in other people's countries business.
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter Again, you're completely missing the point. I'm using your own argument.
If Hitler want Japan, he wouldn't have allied with them. This is your logic that you've used for the Jews. Regardless of the reason. Hitler showered Japan with gifts and compliments, and you MUST know his plans for Japan.
Don't fully know why? Are you kidding me?
America gets in other peoples business, woopdie fuckin' doo. You act like its something new in world history.
KingR3aper 3 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter So you're telling me, America getting into somebodies business, is terrifyingly evil?
Wow, we must REALLY need to deal with that problem! It's a global fucking crisis isn't it? America and meddling internal affairs.
That's going to obviously lead to the slaughter of millions of men women and children, a dictatorship and a world war.
Welcome to goddamn politics, people meddling with foreign internal affairs isn't something exclusive to the U.S.
KingR3aper 3 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter And hopefully, you know keeping someone, something, or some nation around doesn't mean keeping them around forever. Hitler and Stalin had an agreement, were they friends for long?
It's called "Getting someone to help you, and get rid of them later". It's been repeated ALL throughout history, yet you are completely looking over this, as if its never been seen. For "America is evil because they meddle with internal affairs with other countries?".
KingR3aper 3 weeks ago
October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable. In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis-occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews.
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78).
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945. In March, 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp...” (Vol. III, p. 83). Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able.
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
One of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps towards the end of the war. Says the Report: “In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
It is a remarkable fact, however, that well into the war period, the Germans continued to implement the policy of Jewish emigration. The fall of France in 1940 enabled the German Government to open serious negotiations with the French for the transfer of European Jews to Madagascar. A memorandum of August, 1942 from Luther, Secretary-of-State in the German Foreign Office, reveals that he had conducted these negotiations between July and December, 1940, when they were terminated by the French
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
Moreover, there had been no such evidence or declaration of disloyalty by these Japanese Americans as had been given by Weizmann. The British, too, during the Boer War, interned all the women and children of the population, and thousands had died as a result, yet in no sense could the British be charged with wanting to exterminate the Boers. The detention of Jews in the occupied territories of Europe served two essential purposes from the German viewpoint
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
All Jews had thus been declared agents willing to prosecute a war against the German Reich, and as a consequence, Himmler and Heydrich were eventually to begin the policy of internment. It is worth noting that the United States and Canada had already interned all Japanese aliens and citizens of Japanese descent in detention camps before the Germans applied the same security measures against the Jews of Europe.
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
Chaim Weizmann, the principle Zionist leader, had declared war against Germany on behalf of the world’s Jews, stating that “the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies... The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources etc... ” (Jewish Chronicle, September 8, 1939
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
With the coming of the war, the situation regarding the Jews altered drastically. It is not widely known that world Jewry declared itself to be a belligerent party in the Second World War, and there was therefore ample basis under international law for the Germans to intern the Jewish population as a hostile force. On September 5, 1939,
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
Замечательный человек,Великан британской и мировой истории,великий англичанин.Те.кто его называют уродливым-подлецы.Хотя он по копмлекции-полный,но у него взгляд и лицо,достойное КИСТИ Рембрандта."Умнее человека не встречал"-слова Сталина маршалу Голованову.***
alois294 1 month ago in playlist Liked videos
@BonnBerlinerVI BBC article: By the end of 1947, around 250,000 German POWs had been repatriated, but 24,000 decided to stay in Britain. Hans Siegfried Vallentin was one of these. Like many of the others, he'd been a keen supporter of Hitler. He'd even lied about his age to get into the Luftwaffe. He was only 17 when he was shot down and taken prisoner. But now, three years later, he didn't want to go back home.
speedyonehundred 1 month ago
If only England would see that Hitler didn't want war with them nor America....BUT...Britian and America are never wrong....like wtf man?
1WildlandFirefighter 1 month ago
@1WildlandFirefighter So... you expect adjacent nations to stand by and watch whilst their neighbors are annihilated by the Nazi uprising? Do you really think that Hitler would have stopped after conquering Europe? Bull shit! He wanted the world to be dominated by Nazi rule. America and especially Britain had a moral obligation to enter the war.
jackmitch14 1 month ago
@jackmitch14 le facts. You only know what they told you in school.
Look up Hitler speech that they don't want you to hear on Youtube. Hitler didn't want war with Britian or America but the Allied powers pushed it. The Poles were killing Germans in the Sudentland (Once was Germany before the Allies took it from the Germans after WW1)- This left Germans in what the Allied powers made into Poland.
Hitlers main goal was to get rid of Communism and establish Nationalism for every country.
1WildlandFirefighter 1 month ago
@1WildlandFirefighter Even if what you are saying is true, at the end of the day, you cannot deny what the Nazis did to people in the second world war. Torture, humiliation and of course killing were all common place in German concentration camps. And you'll find that the reason for why part of Germany was made into Poland was because it was essentially Germany's fault for causing WW1 in the first place.As punishment for this, it was decided that Germany should give up land.
islandinthesea 1 week ago
@islandinthesea
Actually WW1 wasn't Germanys fault...do you even remember the Serb assassian that killed the Austrian prince thus causing the conflict?
That's like if for instance another country hires an assassian to kill the President. People would want war; especially if they loved that President.
Many POW camps across Europe; Asia; Russia, etc was bad.
The only reason POW camps in America wasn't was because there were no wars in America.
Germans did try to keep the POWs
1WildlandFirefighter 1 week ago
@islandinthesea
alive but they used them for work. The Allies used Germans and Japanese for work too.
The Allies wanted to shame Germany since WW1...they didn't want them to have a military which was a slap in the face.
How would you like if someone told America to not have a military.....bet you wouldn't like that would you? People died in camps. I thought it was "6 million" Jews that died. Shit, they had "4 million" labeled before..I don't they know what they are tlkin bout
1WildlandFirefighter 1 week ago
@1WildlandFirefighter People change the figures all the time. Whoever said that 4 million Jews were killed obviously got their estimates wrong. But so what, they made a mistake, there was no sure fire way of telling how many were killed. It's like when a disaster happens and people are killed, the media gives an estimate but they later change it when they know more about what's happened. That's exactly what its like with the Holocaust, people weren't sure how many died exactly.
islandinthesea 6 days ago
@islandinthesea
it's like they say...oh well they ain;t Jewish so the hell with them. They can die.
1WildlandFirefighter 6 days ago
@jackmitch14
I bet you didn;t know Hitler allied with other nationalities (Races) SUCH as that in India. The Indians wanted to revolt against the British who ruled their country and Hitler helped them so they could establish a Nationalist Indian government without foreign rule.
Hitler did this with many other Nations and also to help eliminate the Communist who were ruling and gaining more territory which you still see today.
1WildlandFirefighter 1 month ago
@jackmitch14
Hitler was making Germany a booming economic powerhouse while the rest of the world dealted with the Great Depression. Hitler pulled Germany out of it just like that EVEN when they had to pay back war debts from WW1. So the Allieds pushed to make a war so it could access them (and tell people they have a reason for war) to resources and land.
1WildlandFirefighter 1 month ago
@1WildlandFirefighter Yes, Hitler may have fixed Germany's economy, gave people jobs and improved the quality of life for many Germans, but his rule did also prove a substantial threat to other countries in Europe, and of course to the Allies. In fact, you'll find that soon after Germany invaded Poland, the Allies actually gave Hitler a chance to reverse what he had done. They told him to pull German soldiers of the Polish streets or a state of war would exist between them. This was ignored
islandinthesea 1 week ago
@1WildlandFirefighter Hitler was evil he needed punished
johnwillan2008 4 weeks ago
@johnwillan2008
The British empire is evil and needed to be punished. So does America and their crimes they commited...OH wait; that's right. America and Britian are always right; they are always good. HA bullshit Sherlock.
1WildlandFirefighter 4 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter Oh really? Please, continue to enlighten us with your knowledge. Do tell us how America and Britain compare to Hitler. Yes, please tell us how they wanted to enslave every population who were not "Aryan", or attempt Genocide on an entire group of people.
Yes, and how they also executed an ethnic group with furnaces, or attempted global domination in one lifetime.
Right, do tell us how TYRANNICAL Britain and America are.
KingR3aper 4 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
Do you know how the Americans killed innocent Indians; moved them in reservations; and nearly wiped out the whole Indian population while moving across the Western frontier? The Confederate States of America was trying to help these Indians as well; if you do not know; but the Union won the war and pushed the Indians into reservations (what was left of them)
1WildlandFirefighter 4 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
Do you even know that Jewish people served in the Nazi Military? Search up "Hitler's Jewish Soldiers". Think for a moment; IF you even have a brain to think: if Hitler wanted to exterminate every Jew like people say...HE WOULDN'T HAVE THEM JOIN HIS MILITARY.
Do you know what Typhoid is? This is the disease that plague the camps in Europe; USSR; and else where in the world that killed alot of people- EVEN GERMANS IN SOVIET POW camps.
1WildlandFirefighter 4 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
Typhoid can be trasmitted from person to person and if a person dies from it (especially alot of people); you have to either bury ot burn their bodies. They don't ths in Europe during the Black Plague which killed alot of Europeans.
Many other diseases were spread throughout the camps & they used pesticides to delouse their clothes and people (Zyklon B). Do me a favor & study in depth more about it if you don't believe me...I doubt you do and I doubt you will search the truth.
1WildlandFirefighter 4 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter They didn't burn the bodies. They executed by burning. There is a huge, huge difference.
Otherwise, they wouldn't have mountain pile of bodies lying there, without burning them or burying. THey were only buried AFTER liberation of the camps.
Yes, and also your whole "BRITISH RULE" thing, they've relinquished their rule in EVERY COUNTRY they had control over.
Hong Kong in 1996, Canada, Australia most noted. They are now known as "The Commonwealth".
KingR3aper 4 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
How do you know?
Look when the Black Plague came through....they had to burn their bodies...oh wait no they were executed.
They bury and burned the dead.
Why did they burn the bodies after the liberation? Hm? Couldn't they buried them since it was a liberation in graves? Hm?
I'm talking about the rule in India. Look about Indian revolution with the Indians joining the Germans,
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter Cute, you realize even the soldiers stationed at the camps freely admitted they were very much alive while being burned in a furnace. They didn't waste time waiting for people to die to burn.
What does british rule in India have to do with anything? Were they under a Tyranical dictatorship?
No, they were simply another Colony. The Indians simply wanted their OWN soverignty, and this was a good opportunity.
I
KingR3aper 3 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter Once again, it seems all too convienient that you use the outbreak of disease as the reason for why so many died in concentration camps in WW2. Whatever the Allies may have done during world war two, it was nowhere near as bad as what Hitler did. Atrocities were commited by BOTH sides, but what Hitler did, was truly horiific, and the fact that you are denying it, quite frankly disgusts me. 6-7 MILLION jews were killed in concentration camps right across Germany.
islandinthesea 1 week ago
@islandinthesea
America used nuclear bombs on a country filled with civilians. They could solved it another way but nope they didn't.
They killed alot of civilians and still even after WW2...people died due to it.
1WildlandFirefighter 1 week ago
@1WildlandFirefighter The country that you say America used nuclear bombs on is Japan, presumably. Well, might I bring to your attention that Japan attacked America first, I mean of course the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbour. The USA had done nothing to provoke Japan into doing this, meaning it was an unprovoked attack. Thousands died in Pearl Harbour, so what do you expect America to do? They RETALIATED. BTW, they did give the Japanese a warning before hand about the nukes.
islandinthesea 6 days ago
@islandinthesea
See, you don't know history and your trying to tell me you know this and that.
Japan had a reason to attack America.
Japan was getting oil and steel from America. Japan and China were battling with each other before WW2. America was allies with China and Japan. Japan was helping the Allies during WW1. Well America wanted to keep China as its Allies due to resources that China had. Japan didn't have alot of resources for it's growing population.
1WildlandFirefighter 6 days ago
@islandinthesea
There has always been a conflict between China and Japan so Japan went to China to get resources and China was a Communist country as well.
Well America didn't like Japan fighting China so they put an embargo on Japan...this would destroy Japan's economy and possibly make them lose alot of lives. So Japan had to somehow still get oil and steel..but America was in it's way since it did the embargo..thus they attacked Pearl Harbor. If America didn't do the embargo
1WildlandFirefighter 6 days ago
@islandinthesea
then Japan possibly wouldn't have attacked Pearl Harbo.
1WildlandFirefighter 6 days ago
@islandinthesea
If Hitler wanted to kill all Jews...he sure as hell wouldn't have let them join his military like he did. Many were Generals. MANY WERE AWARDED MEDALS!
And if was such a "horrific" incident....the Jews wouldn't be asking donations for it still today.
1WildlandFirefighter 1 week ago
@1WildlandFirefighter Well then please explain to me how 6 million Jews died during WW2, and how, many Nazis actually spoke of their hatred for the Jewish population, and even wanted the Jews killed. Also, Hitler was never shy about admitting his hatred for the Jews, yes, he may have awarded them medals but maybe that's because they did a service that was of benefit for the country, and so, Hitler liked them for that. At the end of the day though, the Holocaust did happen. Jews were killed.
islandinthesea 1 week ago
@islandinthesea
People say he wanted to exterminate them. Well like I said..if he wanted to "exterminate" them then he wouldn't have let them join the SS, Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe, Kriegsmarine, etc
You know you always hear about the "Holocaust" yet no one talks about the murdering that the Soviet union did in Eastern Europe...like HOLODOMOR and many more that occured.
Many Russians and Eastern Europeans saw Hitler and his military as saviours from the evil Communist regime.
1WildlandFirefighter 6 days ago
@1WildlandFirefighter Oh god, you're still here. Do you have a problem measuring atrocities?
A week ago you were telling me how the U.S being involved in foriegn affairs was worse than the holocaust. Now you've changed it back to the Soviet Union.
What is the difference between the man-made famine of the Soviet Union, and the Holocaust?
From your standpoint, you see none.
KingR3aper 4 days ago
@1WildlandFirefighter ANd you're still stupidly saying "If he REALLY hated Jews that bad, he wouldn't have let them into the army!"
"If he WANTED to rape that girl that bad, they would've went through the vagina and not the asshole!"
KingR3aper 4 days ago
@1WildlandFirefighter Oh how convienient. Yes, that's right, blame the slaughter of SEVEN MILLION PEOPLE on some disease! The only reason people caught that disease was because of the awful conditions that they were kept in! People were starved and tortured and you know full well that that is no lie, so stop trying to make out as if nothing happened and that the Nazis are innocent because that is the one thing that they aren't- innocent! Would you deny what happened in those camps, hmm?
islandinthesea 1 week ago
@KingR3aper
Britian occupied and rule many countries and still does today..so does America and most of the Superpowers today.
During WW2, Many Indians from India made a revolution against the British that occupied and rule their country so they allied with Hitler to establish Nationalism in India.
During the Iran Hostage Crisis during President Jimmy Carter's rule..the Iranian college students that held the Hostages were trying to do a revolution like the Indians.
1WildlandFirefighter 4 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter ......Ahaha, I don't think you understand - you're bringing in different timelines into the fray. Please, tell me how America and Britain were "EVIL" during WWII.
In the 20th century...
Compared to Hitler.
Yes, sure they EACH had their historical fallacies.
But let me address your "Jew Soldier".
"Elminitating the Jews were more difficult than I thought." they were considered "HALF JEWS". Used to bolster the high casualties.
KingR3aper 4 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
Many full Jews also served my friend.
Look up about the Allied actrocities during WW2. Such as America being the only country to ever use a Nuclear weapon on people (civilains at that of Japan).
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter They also dropped leaflets telling the Japanese to leave the cities because they will level them. They of course, know they wouldn't listen, nor look at them, but dropped it anyway.
But that isn't the point, you're trying to tell me there were atrocities. There were obviously atrocities on both sides.
I'm asking you to compare them, and tell me what is worse. Genocide, world domination, and slavery or two bombs and the end of a war.
KingR3aper 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
They could have settled it peacefully without nuclear weapons. The nuclear radiation affected many people EVEN after WW2.
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter But thats FAR beyond the point whether Hitler or not decided to ELIMINATE Jews completely or not.
The fact remained that 6 million Jews DID die.
So are you telling me, even though 6 million Jews died, Hitler is a BETTER PERSON than the allies, BECAUSE he didn't "Want to eliminate all the jews?"
So you're saying "He's not a bad guy! At least he didn't want to kill ALL the jews"? Is that SERIOUSLY your logic?
KingR3aper 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
How is it just 6 million? Before the camp had 4 million mentioned then years passed and they added 2 million more. The World Almanac of 1938 gives the number of Jews in the world as 16,588,259. But after the war, the New York Times, February 22nd, 1948 placed the number of Jews in the world at a minimum of 15,600,000 and a maximum of 18,700,000
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter Lastly, "they could have settled it peacefully". Right, just like how they tried to settle it peacefully by appeasing Hitler BEFORE the war.
The fact is, the Emperor of Japan wanted to surrender, but his soldiers wouldn't let him. Regardless, they dropped nuclear weapons for a) To see the damage b) To end the war.
Still, Nuclear fallout was not a known thing, nuclear radiation was also not a known thing and was an unpredicted aftermath.
KingR3aper 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
Look up "Hitlers speech they do not want you to hear". Hitler says he wanted peace but America pushed for war. Hitler didn't want war with Britian but Britian declared it. Hitler's officer mentioned this on a video many years after the war here on Youtube. Hitler saw Britian as he saw Germany (the people).
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper Quite obviously, these figures make it impossible for the number of Jewish war-time casualties to be measured in anything but thousands. 15–1/2 million in 1938 minus the alleged six million leaves nine million; the New York Times figures would mean, therefore, that the world’s Jews produced seven million births, almost doubling their numbers, in the space of ten years.
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper This is patently ridiculous. It would appear, therefore, that the great majority of the missing “six million” were in fact emigrants—emigrants to European countries, to the Soviet Union and the United States before, during and after the war. And emigrants also, in vast numbers to Palestine during and especially at the end of the war
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper After 1945, boat-loads of these Jewish survivors entered Palestine illegally from Europe, causing considerable embarrassment to the British Government of the time; indeed, so great were the numbers that the H. M. Stationery Office publication No. 190 (November 5th, 1946) described them as “almost amounting to a second Exodus.”
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper It was these emigrants to all parts of the world who had swollen the world Jewish population to between 15 and 18 millions by 1948, and probably the greatest part of them were emigrants to the United States who entered in violation of the quota laws
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
Many of Japans soldiers didn't have contact with the Emperor. The Japanese were honorable people and didn't want to die a loser. This is shown throughout their history way before WW2.
The Allies knew about Nuclear radiation...Germany was also working on nuclear weapons before as well.
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
Jews were going to be shipped off by Hitler but no country including the USA wanted them. They kept them in POW camps. 150,000+ Jews joined the Wehrmacht, SS, Luftwaffe..and Hitler knew. If he wanted to exterminate EVERY JEW LIKE YOU AND OTHERS SAY...WHY DID HE LET THEM JOIN HIS MILITARY!?!? Don't say they were "PART JEW". Many Jews and half Jews joined. A Jew is a Jew. Jews are suppose to not marry Gentiles (THIS IS IN THE TORAH)
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter :P So basically, what you are saying - the allies were far more evil, because they refused to take Jews that Hitler was trying to force away. So its THEIR fault, 6 million Jews were killed, right?
Just like how a woman gets raped, its her fault for getting raped?
Like I said, they were losing troops exponentially. Jews, regardless "Half Jew" or not, they were used to bolster the Army.
KingR3aper 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
But if you said Hitler was trying to exterminate all Jews like we were taught in school. Why would he let them join? He suppose to not like Jews even to let them join his military.
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
Plus Stalin killed Millions and Millions more people than anyone can imagine. The Communist regime still kills alot of people today.
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
The Iranian students didn't want foreigns to get involved in their internal affairs of their own country...they especially didn't want the Soviets there either since the Communist were of a "Athiestic Government". The Iranians saw that the British; French; Soviets; and Americans were invading their country and trying to rule it.
1WildlandFirefighter 4 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter Yep, because that is DEFINITELY more evil right? Meddling with internal affairs? Like...I dunno...
Every country since...forever?
KingR3aper 4 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
Would you want a foreign country to come in your country and telling your people how to run it? No you wouldn't and if you did your a complete dumbass.
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@1WildlandFirefighter lol, you're adorable. What does Stalin have to do with the British and American side of things?
I believe you said "America and Britain are more EVIL". I'm asking you to tell me how, and the best you can come up with is "They have Colonies and were in other countries"?
....Woopdie fuck. So was Hitler? Poland? Invaded Belgium? France?
And that wasn't even close to the WORST thing he did.
KingR3aper 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper
You just don't understand. Do you know why most of the people allied with Hitler? To rule their own country and to stop the invasion of Communism that was taken place.
Stalin killed millions of murders YET Britian nor America did anything about it AND THEY WERE ALLIES WITH THEM!
Americans and British did the bombing of Dresden that created a firestorm that wiped more people out than the bombing of Britian. Plus not to mention the first country (USA) to be the only
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
@KingR3aper country to use a nuclear weapon on civilians.
Hitler invaded Poland because the Polish people in the part of Poland that was once Germany before WW2 was killing Germans left in that part and Hitler saw that part of Germany was stolen from them and wanted it back. If America lost a war; no one took a part of their land same goes for Britian.
1WildlandFirefighter 3 weeks ago
The Gears of War 2 speech was better.
victoneter 1 month ago
@victoneter See, when comparing speeches made in real life and speeches made on a video game, I have to say, the speeches made in real life are better. Just like Churchill's. You may not like him, but if you think that a speech that was made on a video game is better than a speech made in real life, then you are slightly deluded. No offence, I'm just saying.
islandinthesea 1 month ago
@islandinthesea Well you're right. The issues in real life speeches actually matter and are relevant while in a video game or in a movie they're not, but the difference is that this speech doesn't give me the chills as much as the one in Gears of War. My comment earlier was more like a joke anyway.
victoneter 1 month ago
Churchill was a fantastic leader! He got us through the storm that is war and he did it well. I've gotta admit, he is an inspiration, despite what many haters say.
islandinthesea 1 month ago
On your own asertions, it will also make Italians (the roman empire) your superior, for it was they showed the island monkey how to shit in a channel, you are so deluded.
America,yet governed by retarted apes are your master, such a privilege for the ousted no-bodies of this European continent, so best of luck for you.
All BBC is lies and a joke of Europe, yet how will you know it.I will make example after example, yet why the problem.... ; ) monkey...
BonnBerlinerVI 1 month ago
@BonnBerlinerVI How is America Britain's master? I mean, lets not forget how just 300 years ago, America was ruled by Britain. In fact, lets not forget how Britain had the largest empire in human history, if we were apes, we would not have been able to do that. And no,we didn't just "get lucky". Well, you may call me an "island monkey" but at least I know that many of history's great scientists, philosophers and of course, inventions came from this island. So fuck you, Britain hating trash!
islandinthesea 1 month ago
@islandinthesea Without the US, the war could not have defeated Nazi Germany, except maybe the USSR. And even in that instance the war would have been longer and deadlier
areallygoodshoe 1 month ago
@islandinthesea Great Britain didn't have the capability to manufacture everything it needed, her factories were being destroyed by the Luftwaffe,and even at 100% their manufacturing base was only a fraction of the American capacity.Even the Soviet Union,the largest nation in the world, imported millions tons of supplies each year through 1945.Did Britain have an incredible will to fight?yes. But did they need American aid to do so?yes to that too
areallygoodshoe 1 month ago
usa sucks hehe :P
MsMethlab 1 month ago
@islandinthesea Great Britain needed American manufactured goods to fight the war and protect her people. And last I checked we did fight Japan in WW II...
areallygoodshoe 1 month ago
@areallygoodshoe Yes, I suppose we did fight Japan didn't we? Just not as much as Germany. And although, yes, Britain did need some US manufactured goods, I'd imagine that the majority of the goods would have been made right here in Britain, as it was much easier to do so. Why bother with crate loads of goods from the US when you can make the same stuff right here in Britain at a much cheaper price?
islandinthesea 1 month ago
@HaiLsKuNkY Im not saying that Britain would have been destroyed, Just that they didnt have the resources to defeat Germany on her own. From 1937 on US aid was provided to not only Britain but even the USSR. The United States had by far the strongest manufacturing base at the time
areallygoodshoe 1 month ago
HAHAHAHAHA! Whose
tomwaters7 1 month ago
lol @butthurt Brits desperately trying to pretend they're something they're not while they talk like Americans, watch American TV, listen to American music, fight in American wars (not very well, which is why we have to finish every fucking thing they start) and are basically our little lapdog in every way imaginable. Then they come across the water and talk about a "special relationship" (LOL) like a fucking playground weakling and try and act like they're American and not European.
TheJay9002 1 month ago
@TheJay9002 what language are you using? Where are the Beatles from? Where are most of the best bands in the world from? American TV - X factor is created by an Englishman. As was American Idol. The British have been in the Middle East since they gave Palestine away - Since we conquered it. You're British really.
jordan2704 1 month ago
@TheJay9002 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! YOU EMBARASSMENT! Whose language are you speaking???
tomwaters7 1 month ago
@TheJay9002 HAHAHAHA!!! We try to talk like Americans, just remember whose language you are speaking! Which country controlled half the world, which country made the first real computer, which country made the first tank, jet engine and locomotive.Sir Isac Newton, whom without civilasation would be at leat 100 years behind it's current development, was British, William Shakespere was British the list goes on. But do not forget there would be no America without England!
tomwaters7 1 month ago 2
@tomwaters7 Well said mate you couldve thrown penicillin television mr dunlop tarmac roads I dont detract from what the USA done during ww2 . But they have got a tendancy to piss us off slagging monty off constantly duz it for me especially when they had numpteys like patton and bradley
tvamp88 1 month ago
@tomwaters7 Yeah who's country gave the Jews Palestine and has fucked up the middle east because of it. Who's country let India split into 3 separate countries giving birth to Pakistan which is a terrorist state. Not to speak of all the killing that has gone on in the name of the crown. So shut up and stop believing everything Jeremy Clarkson says in his stupid documentary's. Also England invented a few things but the computer wasn't one of them, dumb ass!
deluxsound123 1 month ago
@deluxsound123 Let me tell you why India split into three different countries, because you clearly don't know why; Before the partition of Pakistan from India, there was a lot of fighting between Muslims and Hindus. So when the British left India, it was decided that in order to stop the fighting, there had to be a place where Muslims could live without Hindus, ensuring peace.So, the new state of Pakistan was formed, and is where many Muslims then went to after its creation in the 1940s.
islandinthesea 1 month ago
@deluxsound123 Oh and we didn't give the Jews Palestine, we controlled it and that whole general area, but we never just handed it over to the Jews. And yes, England didn't invent the computer, but we did invent the light bulb, the jet engine, the telephone, etc... And the context in which you said documentaries is wrong. If you're talking about one documentary e.g. "The documentary's really helpful" then you put the apostrophe in, when talking about more than one, you leave the apostrophe out.
islandinthesea 1 month ago
@deluxsound123 NO A BRITISH MAN DEVELOPED AND MADE THE FIRST COMPUTER, his name was Tommy Flower and his computer helped defeat the Germans. It wasn't until later that any american replicated a similiar computer with no moving parts. SO YOU ARE A DUMBASS! Britain shaped the world as you know it, and you have to admit that without England there would be no America. Also we gave India and such countries stable governments among with things like currency etc. And do we even need to mention VIETNAM!
tomwaters7 1 month ago
YOU ARE A FUCKING RETARD! Brits listening to Yanks music? Have you ever heard of The Beatles? Led Zeppelin? Rolling Stone! Fight in American Wars? That's because WERE FUCKING ALLIES YOU DAFT CUNT! Britain is America's lapdog? I've never in my life EVER witnessed a Brit speaking like or spelling like a yank. Pretending/ wishing to be one. Why would we want to be the most retarded, inbred, most hated nationality on the earth? I'm pretty sure you have to be the STUPIDEST PERSON ALIVE!
Callingyou22 1 month ago
@TheJay9002 If you believe what you are saying (WHICH IS COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY UNTRUE) If only Yanks would stop fucking their sisters and cousins they'd have less retards roaming the earth (AKA you!) Have you heard of the Beatles? Led Zeppelin? Go read a book and spell COLOUR right you fucking inbred! Also, if you have this hate towards Britain so much, give Canada back Alaska and stop watching CHURCHILL VIDS YOU STUPID MOTHER FUCKER
Callingyou22 1 month ago
@TheJay9002 This is true.."lapdog"ahaha
BonnBerlinerVI 1 month ago
@BonnBerlinerVI No, it isn't. Stupid idiot!
islandinthesea 1 month ago
@islandinthesea Rest of the world will think so, island monkey, ignorance is your only defence, as for sure your opinion is fed by your isolated media, bahahha,
BonnBerlinerVI 1 month ago
@BonnBerlinerVI "Island monkey" ha, your comments are as pathetic as the country from which you are from. Oh and ignorance isn't our "only defence", because if it was then we'd be long gone, and yet, we are still here and will never go away! The reason being a very simple one, we have the best special ops team in the world! And this special ops team along with our extremely well trained soldiers, our the defenders of this island.And my country's media is not "isolated" as you so stupidly claim!
islandinthesea 1 month ago
@BonnBerlinerVI BTW, every time you have a go at Britain, just remember that the language you are speaking is actually from Britain, and not the country that your from. Also, my country's media is hardly "isolated", because you'll find that channels such as the BBC are global. Still based in Great Britain, but shown in other countries, oh and also we invented TV, and most other media items you see around you today. So, you're not only speaking MY language but also using tech made in MY country!
islandinthesea 1 month ago
@BonnBerlinerVI I'd hardly call a nation that had the largest empire in history, discovered entire continents and set up colonies on newly discovered lands a "lapdog", and that it just "copies America all the time", because lets not forget, less than 300 years ago, America was ruled by Britain, so if anything, America is the lapdog because they speak Britain's language, use Britain's technology and have the same traditions that we here in Britain have! And that is no denying that!
islandinthesea 1 month ago
Dont try and persuade the ignorant. Dont trust the stigma of the ignorant and believe that is all of our opinions. Just back away from the ignorant, no matter what country they are from they will only embaress us all.
Ichibanhaha 1 month ago
@islandinthesea Always the same, speak of the english dire situation and they speak of an extinct empire. The Turks had a great empire, look at it now, yet at the very least they did not steal land from primitive tribes in Australia, Africa and Americas, really no one is admiring that sort of empire.
Remember the english had no empire, only the wealthy elite, the rest of you all, treated worse than slaves, that is undeniable.
BonnBerlinerVI 1 month ago
@BonnBerlinerVI Are you that retarded? It wasn't the English who had the Empire- it was the British! Do you not know the difference between England and Britain? You stupid hairy ape!! And of course we had an empire! How can you say that we didn't? It's even in EVERY SINGLE history book you can find, and they all say the same thing, a small island called Britain controlled a THIRD OF THE PLANET- yes that's right- A THIRD OF THE PLANET- now that is undeniable!
islandinthesea 1 month ago
@BonnBerlinerVI And when you talk of the Turks empire, you say how at least that empire never stole land of primitive tribes! Well let me tell you this- at least the British Empire never practised genocide! The Ottoman empire did! Of course being the ignorant twat that you are, you will deny this and make up something bad about the British empire, which will prove to be false! The British Empire was great, the Ottoman was not! Britain is also great, that's why it is called GREAT Britain!!!
islandinthesea 1 month ago
@islandinthesea I think you find you are wrong. The british are no exception. Every major empire have committed Genocide of some kind. The British in Ireland for example. The potato famine only effected potato. The british could have give some of the food to lessen the problem but they didn't. Its not direct genocide but it is still genocide. It wiped out half of ireland's popluation. A famine in India between 1876 and 1908, the british establisment caused over 12-33 million deaths.
Tomas21052 1 month ago
@Tomas21052 I detect a certain double standard here. Ireland were part of the United Kingdom at this time, so was it responsible (in part) for the famine in India too?
speedyonehundred 1 month ago
@speedyonehundred Ireland was invaded and governed by the force of england, so also the Irish are responible for India ?..., do any one believe this shit...it is ridiculous to the very core, rational is a scare quality on england.
BonnBerlinerVI 1 month ago
@islandinthesea and also the british goverment were the first to use concertation camps in the boer wars. Did you also know Hilter's favourate film was the bengal tiger. A film about british policy in india.
Tomas21052 1 month ago
@Tomas21052 Yes, and the Americans have used concentration camps too. But in both cases they weren't murder camps, although some 10,000 people died of disease and starvation in the UK camps after supply failures, leading to an outcry back in England.
speedyonehundred 1 month ago
@speedyonehundred Over one million staved or died of diseases in the allied death camps, German soldiers that had surrendered had as well to be shot as this.
BonnBerlinerVI 1 month ago
@BonnBerlinerVI If this is true, and I very much doubt it based on your messages on this site (which are very bitter at the very least), then it didn't happen at the hands of the British. Many german POWs settled in Britain after the war. They were treated under the Geneva Convention.
speedyonehundred 1 month ago
@speedyonehundred Agreed, the allied death camps were run by your master, the Americans but none the less the english were happy with this.
For German POWs living in england, ahhha, that is ridiculous. The english have a problem with all nations to this very moment. Will any one imagine a German soldier living in england post-war.
BonnBerlinerVI 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BonnBerlinerVI The US abided by the Geneve Convention. Also see this BBC article extract: "By the end of 1947, around 250,000 German POWs had been repatriated, but 24,000 decided to stay in Britain. Hans Siegfried Vallentin was one of these. Like many of the others, he'd been a keen supporter of Hitler. He'd even lied about his age to get into the Luftwaffe. He was only 17 when he was shot down and taken prisoner. But now, three years later, he didn't want to go back home."
speedyonehundred 1 month ago
@islandinth Also winston churchill send over to ireland crimials, ex-soldiers to go and murder lrish people. Thousands were killed by the Black and tans. No Genocide ever practised by the british establisment? Ithink i have proved my point
Tomas21052 1 month ago
@Tomas21052 And of course there were only two countries whose leaders commiserated the Germans on the death of Hitler - one was its ally Italy, and the other was Ireland.
speedyonehundred 1 month ago
@TheJay9002 HA! Please, we're the lapdogs? Let's just see for a moment-who's language are you speaking? Britain's! Who gave you idiots television in the first place?- The British! Oh and,YOU keep asking US for help every time you get involved in some overseas conflict! Also, we have the best special ops team in the world, how can you say that we don't fight in wars very well? We used to rule the waves, had the largest empire in history and you think that we aren't very good at fighting in wars?
islandinthesea 1 month ago
@TheJay9002 And actually, we don't act like we're American or European, we act like we're British! Cos that's what we are! Why the hell would we rather act like we're American? That's just stupid. Then again, it's typical of an American to think that, because you lot think that you're the best, that everybody wants to be like you, when in actual fact they don't! Oh and at least we here in Britain have diversity and are never too far away from learning an interesting language!
islandinthesea 1 month ago
top man we could do with him now to sort this country out
tweety313able 1 month ago
700,000 of indian voulenteer MILITIA fought in north africa for the sake of BRITISH ..... and when he was asked who are those brown people are ...he said there was no such people fighting for us north africa????..... huh.
deepakclaw 1 month ago
LOL all this people saying "we". we had nothing to do with this, we didnt land on normandy,fight in stalingrad,fly spitfires over southern england,liberate death camps or see our friends killed next to us. WE should shut the fuck up.
5115wb 1 month ago
Traitor
81Szczery 1 month ago
Id like to have a drink and a nice big cigar with Churchill.
Sumoto999 1 month ago
@Sumoto999 The same here. Magnificent Leader, Churchill was.
Saxowolf 1 month ago
@Saxowolf Very true.
islandinthesea 1 month ago
Indeed.. drunk :D
didolinda 2 months ago
Love ya Blighty
crassazell 2 months ago
Great Britain could not have survived let alone triumphed against Germany or Japan without US aid, even before the US joined the war itself
areallygoodshoe 2 months ago
@areallygoodshoe Hitler didn't hate Britain, he liked it, he even spent 6 months living in Liverpool with his brother Alois Hitler. Britain's king Edward VIII was a Nazi sympathizer during the war he was exiled to the Bahamas. Britain defiantly would of survived the war even if we lost, we wouldn't be speaking German either. Britain has strong links with Germans going back to the Anglo Saxons. queen Elizabeth is half German.
HaiLsKuNkY 1 month ago
@HaiLsKuNkY Yes but because we have "strong links with the Germans", surely that's all the more reason why we should speak German? You see, this is the question that the Nazis would have proposed and is the reason why they would've made us learn and then speak German. And even if they didn't, they would've made us use the same currency as Germany, the Mark, I believe its called. Using the same currency would make things a lot easier, economy and finance wise.
islandinthesea 1 month ago
@areallygoodshoe
Don't get the Red Army.
royaladam 1 month ago
@areallygoodshoe Yes, it could have survived without US aid, because it had the might of the Empire to back it up. And since when did we ever fight Japan in ww2?
islandinthesea 1 month ago
Someone should make a video with these speeches set to the inception music
baseballgus777 2 months ago
somehow i got here from jimmy carr talking about threesomes... wtf
bludgerable 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CHURCHILL is a fucking WAR CRIMINAL for the HOLOCAUST OF BOMBS DROPPED ON DRESDEN! FUCK the Treaty of Versailles & the FUCKING EVIL ZIONIST ANTI-CHRISTS with their FAKE HOLO-HOAX, just an excuse to INVADE PALESTINE! WHITE POWER for the people of Germany!
whitechristian1066 2 months ago
@whitechristian1066 YOU ARE A BIG FUCKING RETARD!! HOW THE HELL IS CHURCHILL A WAR CRIMINAL WHEN HITLER GAVE THE ORDER TO KILL EVERY SINGLE JEW IN FUCKING GERMANY??!!
islandinthesea 1 month ago
@islandinthesea FUCK OFF you nigger loving communist faggot! The HOLO-HOAX was a FAKE EXCUSE to INVADE Palestine & COMMIT GENOCIDE on the Palestinian Christians! YOU'RE A FUCKING CUNT!
whitechristian1066 1 month ago
@whitechristian1066 HA! HA! HA! Where did you learn that, some bloody documentary created by apes like yourself? What a load of shit! Every word that you type in to your little computer is nothing but a load of fucking shit! You see, I have a little thing called common sense, which is basically where I don't believe stupid conspiracy theories created by right-wing extremists like yourself. You racist, right-wing, Nazi loving piece of trash!!
islandinthesea 1 month ago
@islandinthesea believe EVERYTHING the DIRTY KIKE ZIONIST MEDIA tells you, dirty jew!
whitechristian1066 1 month ago
@whitechristian1066 Oh do us all a favour and shove your stupid little conspiracy theories up your arse! You RACIST, BIGOTED, NAZI LOVING PIECE OF SCUM!! All you people do is hate and fear anyone who is different to you! "Hate and Fear" that's what you scum bags believe isn't it! Churchill was the best damn leader this country has ever known whilst Hitler was nothing more than some oppressive, genocidal dictator who hated Jews! Oh and BTW, I'm actually a Christian, not a Jew!
islandinthesea 1 month ago