Ok..I'm quite new to leaving comments on You-tube. I don't understand the people who rate it sometimes. Why on earth would a clip of images like this have Dislikes on it??.. National Geographic employs some of the best photographers in the world; and those that have left still have very successful careers like Joe Mcnally for example
Hey, i|I}f you're looking for}|wanting|in need of}| need| want} a good spot to host your pics, visit ww w. free image house . com, that's what I go to|where I go to} all the time. Nice upload!
Having the eye is just the natural talent part of it. Once you have the eye or figure out you have the eye, you start experimenting with different equipment and how it effects your photos.
If I want to go for something that looks great with an old poloaroid, I go for it. If I want something that looks extremely clear and has a lot of depth, I go for a high end camera.
Having an eye is just half of photography. Different equipment develops different photos...
Uhm, to take photos like the one's above, it takes a really expensive camera. It also takes computer programs to edit the photo to look so magnificent, which those are also expensive.
Working in today's economy, it's very hard to buy nice camera equipment. Lenses can be around 10,000 dollars sometimes!
I said some lenses cost that much. Regardless, 4500 dollars is not something anybody I know could throw around very easily. I don't see where your point lies.
Absolutely you can, but to do what the guys above do and to really get the picture you WANT it takes money.
This is my point. I have a Nikon D40 and I take as great of pictures as I can with it, I have a picture or two posted as a background in some of my videos. Having had the D40 for three years now, I'm craving something else. I'd still use my Nikon for some things, but there are pictures I can't take with my D40 and some limitations.
However, the film in the long run can be expensive, not to mention the developing equipment and enlargers. It can add up really fast. It can also take up huge amounts of space.
Don't get me wrong, I still use film cameras for more fine art related images, but the prices still add up quickly.
I got a professional level Nikon SLR for $300. Great camera, widely considered one of the best cameras ever made, a Nikon F3. I know that people like digital, but you can do things on film that you just can't on digital. The quality of a good black and white film has a very different feel to it than a digital made to look B&W. (I admit that some color film has its short comings though) Still, a good film camera can get you far. Just look at Ansel Adams, Henri Cartier-Bresson, or Robert Capa.
Believe it or not, the taxes here in Brazil are so heavy that a Nikon D40 SLR costs more than $ 1000 and an SLR D200 costs over $ 2500. So I asked them the price, $ 300 is very cheap if compared with the prices charged here.
How do I get to become a National Geographic Photographer? It's like any other job where you give a resume and a portfolio or there's any other kind of erm... test?
photos should tell a story weather its good or bad a photo should also be unbiasd in nature so that other people can chose weather they like the image in the photo or not
That's nonsense. I don't know where the people in the photo originate from but I can guarantee you they do not have an historical or ancestral connection to New Zealand.
you're an idiot. If someone ask's a genuine question try and give a genuine answer. If you want to just open your mouth and bullshit than at least have the courtesy to say that your answer was a joke. If you don't know the answer you should just shut up.
Digital has indeed opened a whole new era for photographers. Gone is the roll of film that had to be processed, so that you could see, the next day, that the ONE perfect shot on the roll was misfocused, or overexposed, or miscomposed. After it was too late to go back and shoot it again.
I couldn't begin to count the "almost perfect" failures I've taken in my life that I could've MADE perfect if I'd seen them right then and made that one little adjustment. Now we can.
I understand what you are saying. But coming from my perspective (one who is not that enthralled by the digital revolution in film media yet is being dragged kicking and screaming into it) I still love the spontaneity of film. The waiting process is not a drag for me. It is like waiting for xmas day. And sometimes, those mistakes you refer to have actually given me some of my greatest images. I understand the digital revolution and its value. But film still hold a majesty for me.
When I was a kid we had a subscription to National Geographic. We all read it and sometimes argued over who got to open our clean pristine copy and see the most beautiful photos of the world. That was a ticket out of the Midwest for a few short hours. That is until my brother or sister snatched it from me! LOL
@chopin65 - I too was a midwestern (farm) kid who discovered the world via the National Geographic. And I didn't just look at the pictures of the bare-breasted tribal women... honest... I swear!
I wish I could work for Nat Geo... I wish I could be good enough to work for them The pictures those photographers take are amazing. the things they see are increadible and once in a life time on occasion!
I guess I hadn't really thought about how digital photography has changed our lives. Posting 40 photos from a weekend party on facebook would have been almost impossible 15 years ago (if facebook existed back then, of course). Sometimes I think the casual photos are the best and are the most telling.
The first time I picked up a digital camera, it was the start of something big for me. I have quite a bit of talent. I plan on being a nature photographer when I'm older.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
typical overly emotional pseudo artist teenage female? nature photographer seems like all of you are either fashion designers or photographers. get real jobs or a better hobby.
Digital is great in some regards, but it will never attain the quality of film. A typical 35mm film camera (small in the pro world) is equivalent to 25 mp digital camera.
Don't get me wrong, digital provides a very convenient way to capture images, I'm just pointing out that film is the mother of all photography and digital should never get more credit that film.
Another example, a typical 4x5 large format film camera (used for pros) is equivalent to 100 mega pixels!!!
@sean9820 They switched to a lot of new technologies too early. I have never actually seen a 100 megapixel digital camera. Also, in many ways VHS's are better than DVD's (not sure about Blu-Ray).
the only diffrence between VHS, DVD, CD, BLu-RAY is the the way its stored.
meaning blu-ray readers/writers have a way smaller laser than DVD or CD and thus can contain huge amount of data.
it has nothing todo with pictures... besides digital cameras hold SD cards. wjhich have speeds as high(er) as 25mb/s thats why you can take pictures fast with high quality.
That's the basic difference, but each has its own quirks. A DVD player doesn't last NEARLY as long as a VHS one, DVD's (especially Blu-Rays) are very overpriced, DVD's are prone to scratching while a tape can be left out with no problems, and tapes don't freeze up unless something is wrong with the film. Obviously, DVD's have many advantages, but they could have taken more time to perfect these flaws. Also, Blu-Ray discs load faster and have a plastic coating so they last much longer [cont.]
[cont.] I agree that digital cameras are much better with the same output, there's just no question. Overall, I prefer digital media a lot more than analog, but there are just some things that digital can't do yet. Given time (probably not long at the rate of technology today), I believe they will address all of those issues. Then comes Skynet :)
Oh joy, I can watch a fucking National Geographic video. Too bad I can't watch the other 8 million videos that I want to see because of some BULLSHIT "This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions"
Colonizing Mars? That looks like an awesome video! TOO BAD I CAN'T FUCKING WATCH IT!
GET YOUR FUCKING SHIT TOGETHER NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC! I LIVE IN CANADA, NOT THE FREAKING MOON! I SHOULD BE ABLE TO WATCH YOUR VIDEOS LIKE ANYONE ELSE! JESUS!
I have that issue with cnn on youtube .I can watch them on television,but i can't on a public internet site and there from my own country.Not that I really care for cnn,but you get what I mean.
what about the bears! WHAT ABOUT THE BEARS! They have feelings too!. lol im just kidding but seriously making a bear stand for an hour...thats pretty much why they made digital cameras
stunning pictures. but I dont agree that future is digital. future is analog as well. Just like Mr Sasson said:"imaging is not about technology. it is about pictures."
can anybody tell me what is going on on 0:33 ??
felixStuff 7 months ago
Ok..I'm quite new to leaving comments on You-tube. I don't understand the people who rate it sometimes. Why on earth would a clip of images like this have Dislikes on it??.. National Geographic employs some of the best photographers in the world; and those that have left still have very successful careers like Joe Mcnally for example
mpenny2008 1 year ago
@mpenny2008 Welcome to the internet.
rex8000 7 months ago
Hey, i|I}f you're looking for}|wanting|in need of}| need| want} a good spot to host your pics, visit ww w. free image house . com, that's what I go to|where I go to} all the time. Nice upload!
Dotcommunism1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Be honest naughty women here benaughtyman.info
jhklghdjhkjhkjjk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Interesting clip, I was recently reading about something similar on thephotographyclinic (.) com
ugliestalmanac4 1 year ago
Nat Geo simply doesn`t pay well enough to get the best photographers. The veterans have left . Its a sad fact.
Mokster315 1 year ago 2
knock me I am from Asian # lushfmlk.info #
WynnonaXandra 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Find a playful chick make it tonight benaughtyman.info
qaswedasdfr 1 year ago
I too would LOVE to be a Photographer for National Geographic Magazine!
VodeoJMC63 1 year ago
好清楚又漂亮的照片~!
w570102 1 year ago
Comment removed
Default158 1 year ago
I am a street photogarphy and live in Harlem, NYC check my photos along with Dubstep beats
BDOBS 1 year ago
Check out mbmarconi fine art photography...beautiful work!!!!
Iamthelightofthestar 1 year ago
i love it!
threefourninetyfour 1 year ago
Beautiful.
GregWatermann 1 year ago
0:34 WTF?
I love photography, digital cameras truly have revoloutionised the world
patton1500 1 year ago
what im still tryin to figure out is why the hell they made photography an artform....
fukyourmom 1 year ago
why do you think photography does not deserve to be classed as art?
ClintGreggor 1 year ago
try to make some picture like that
aghunklasido 2 years ago
These are the things that drop me speachless. They make me feel like I know nothing about photography.
ossme 2 years ago 26
brilliant photographic works
chaoticcaesium 2 years ago
Wish I could be pictured using that hi-tech camera! Wanted to look the details of it..
Nadya109 2 years ago
waw, this is very bueaty...who much?
yousefalinaser 2 years ago
0:06-0:07 - so cute^^
jesusmile 2 years ago
satan \m/ :-)
kaelwu 2 years ago
zajebiste foto
tedydw 2 years ago
0:19 how was it taken ?
ThomasCracow 2 years ago
Thank you for your WORKS and New Era.
aungcorp 2 years ago
Having the eye is just the natural talent part of it. Once you have the eye or figure out you have the eye, you start experimenting with different equipment and how it effects your photos.
If I want to go for something that looks great with an old poloaroid, I go for it. If I want something that looks extremely clear and has a lot of depth, I go for a high end camera.
Having an eye is just half of photography. Different equipment develops different photos...
brianwildemusic 2 years ago
Yep. Knowing when to use the right type of equipment is very important.
Zyphet 2 years ago
0:33
wordsandtricks 2 years ago
Comment removed
wordsandtricks 2 years ago
hey nick your the man
Raylj318 2 years ago
put them on google image,,,
then we can all enjoy and have them as wallpapers.
frvfilms 2 years ago 3
fucking awesome picture they have!
eyzaemo94 2 years ago 3
omg so amazing.
i want a photography camera sooo bad but theyre too expensive. :(
ohshitmanda 2 years ago 3
wtf O_o..
thats why there's jobs :P
leonleonleon1313 2 years ago
Uhm, to take photos like the one's above, it takes a really expensive camera. It also takes computer programs to edit the photo to look so magnificent, which those are also expensive.
Working in today's economy, it's very hard to buy nice camera equipment. Lenses can be around 10,000 dollars sometimes!
brianwildemusic 2 years ago
Uhm..no not really 2500 USD is enough a coupla good lenses another 2 grand and a few digital cards and you are ready.
cannoir 2 years ago
I said some lenses cost that much. Regardless, 4500 dollars is not something anybody I know could throw around very easily. I don't see where your point lies.
brianwildemusic 2 years ago 2
You can buy a camera for $300 and take pictures.
seka1986 2 years ago
@seka1986
Absolutely you can, but to do what the guys above do and to really get the picture you WANT it takes money.
This is my point. I have a Nikon D40 and I take as great of pictures as I can with it, I have a picture or two posted as a background in some of my videos. Having had the D40 for three years now, I'm craving something else. I'd still use my Nikon for some things, but there are pictures I can't take with my D40 and some limitations.
Lenses are the most expensive though.
brianwildemusic 2 years ago
@brianwildemusic why does it have the @ message wierd
thejustinl1 2 years ago
@thejustinl1
I don't know for sure, but I think it's something Youtube is trying so people know who's replying to who.
brianwildemusic 2 years ago
Not true... film is still better then digital, and you can get a pro-level film camera for less then $100 on the used market.
djacobox372 2 years ago
However, the film in the long run can be expensive, not to mention the developing equipment and enlargers. It can add up really fast. It can also take up huge amounts of space.
Don't get me wrong, I still use film cameras for more fine art related images, but the prices still add up quickly.
cleodel88 2 years ago
Uhm... film is not better than digital, haha.
It may be more fun and rewarding as a process, but not BETTER than digital.
brianwildemusic 2 years ago
Cool! absolutely gorgeous...
petersoncari 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This youtube should be with Jeff Fisher addresses the world part one and Jeff Fisher addresses the world 3
MrAlemuKihsay 2 years ago
Microsoft really wants their customers back :P Hate the ads; Love digital cameras ^^
globaltrance86 2 years ago
those photos are absolutely gorgeous...
Skydance1110 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
omg progressive lady FAP FAP FAP
sanandreas4ever 2 years ago
Wow! COOL!
CloudNineFairy 2 years ago
awesome !!! O_O
dollyzacil 2 years ago
cool. that dude who invented the digital camera Steve Sasson is probably rich as heck. I would like to work with him.
MidwestMex 2 years ago
id love to be a photographer for natgeo!
roflomglolzwtf 2 years ago 21
Imagine how much costs a professional camera to take this photos.
URIZHEY 2 years ago
I got a professional level Nikon SLR for $300. Great camera, widely considered one of the best cameras ever made, a Nikon F3. I know that people like digital, but you can do things on film that you just can't on digital. The quality of a good black and white film has a very different feel to it than a digital made to look B&W. (I admit that some color film has its short comings though) Still, a good film camera can get you far. Just look at Ansel Adams, Henri Cartier-Bresson, or Robert Capa.
TheArtistOfKuroo 2 years ago
Pah-lee-ze !!!! cartier bresson's pictures are just "meh" , people just got caught up in the upper class photography thing.
cannoir 2 years ago
Believe it or not, the taxes here in Brazil are so heavy that a Nikon D40 SLR costs more than $ 1000 and an SLR D200 costs over $ 2500. So I asked them the price, $ 300 is very cheap if compared with the prices charged here.
And thanks for explaining me. ;)
URIZHEY 2 years ago
Great choice, you should give medium format film a try... a 6x7 negative makes even the most expensive digital photos look horrible.
djacobox372 2 years ago
Though, it is still pretty expensive to work in film, especially if you live out in the middle of no where.
cleodel88 2 years ago
prelepe slike
adgjlrefik 2 years ago
are some of this pictures real or fake
K3vinDS 2 years ago
Album mais que perfeito!! lindooooo
SrtaBrazilian 2 years ago
bill murray?
fleebus090 2 years ago
0:19 is it a dead girl?
Nharin 2 years ago
I guess she is standing on wood.
alayvshah 2 years ago
:O
i didn't pay attention to it...
tnx
Nharin 2 years ago
You wish!
AntiChrist67 2 years ago
It appears to be a girl standing on a walled peg. I could be wrong though.
ApexIXMR 2 years ago
she's standing on the wooden poles that stick out, like the ones near her head, to the left/right.
superheaton 2 years ago
yeah, i saw it better after... tnx
Nharin 2 years ago
bad ranking..
aureliopaz 2 years ago
d+ essas fotos
lucios1985 2 years ago
How do I get to become a National Geographic Photographer? It's like any other job where you give a resume and a portfolio or there's any other kind of erm... test?
okodorifuto 2 years ago 4
You have to take exceptional pictures and then get noticed for it.
unavailabale 2 years ago
I'm so buying this book!
okodorifuto 2 years ago
Great info on the invention of digital camera and the images are amazing too
tuttle566 2 years ago
photos should tell a story weather its good or bad a photo should also be unbiasd in nature so that other people can chose weather they like the image in the photo or not
booly5 2 years ago
Some photos are great.:)
MacieQ88PL 2 years ago 2
0:20, did that girl levitate?
kluang1 2 years ago 2
nahh, she's just standing on top of a pole sticking in the wall. like the one on the upper right and left of the house.
Arsespankin 2 years ago 2
exactly what i was wondering.
jarofhappiness 2 years ago
nicely done
good work
MrBadHonk 2 years ago
11.337 Aufrufe
polarityyy 2 years ago
VERY GOOD!
Dragonfling 2 years ago
Too bad most images have been edited in photoshop to look better these days.
Truzo 2 years ago 5
I dont think NG photos are photoshoped...
aboodmatar 2 years ago
they are surely photoshoped, just like any professional image, but they keep the realistic view.
yamaryam 2 years ago
They do edit the quality of the pictures and the tone of colouring
Rsalex6670 2 years ago
Yes, they do, although sometimes it comes out like that...
bothropsasper 2 years ago
exceptional footage and real sound
very memorble pictures..
all our care love and respect
many starz*****************
cheers love and light
CDm
M
CDmagz 2 years ago
And it makes me sick that this power and valuable tool is being wasted by the younger generation for sleezy Myspace pics. HAHA
InsideLosAngeles 2 years ago 2
if i had it all to do over again... i would be a photographer...
mindygrahamkrauth 2 years ago
may I know what tribe is that at 2:01? anybody?
straightJO 2 years ago
that is the maka muaiai tribe orginated and started in 500 bc and still livng in new zealand
Benitopsp 2 years ago
That's nonsense. I don't know where the people in the photo originate from but I can guarantee you they do not have an historical or ancestral connection to New Zealand.
johnwardknox 2 years ago
you're an idiot. If someone ask's a genuine question try and give a genuine answer. If you want to just open your mouth and bullshit than at least have the courtesy to say that your answer was a joke. If you don't know the answer you should just shut up.
gadget133 2 years ago
I love NGC's photos since I was in high school.
chrisboxing 2 years ago
wow ! beautiful pictures ;)
IamPinky11loveHUNTER 2 years ago
Great photos! I love this video!
Kafizinha 2 years ago
awsome!!!
zains68 2 years ago
thts beautiful! :D
greendolphin214 2 years ago
Long Days and Pleasant Evenings with the best of health to all photography personnel at National Geographic, always,
Primitive Cool 5
primitivecool5 2 years ago
photographic awesomeness at its peak !! xP
pashaahsj 2 years ago
Wow...so beautiful..
sakurasoh 2 years ago
beautiful
eljaimillo 2 years ago
Wow. My dream job would be to be a photographer for National Geographic...maybe one day huh
punkyhiphopdood 2 years ago
FANTASTIC!!!
Lucenablues 2 years ago
Photography is amazing.
gatoradeboy1234 2 years ago
nature photography is amazing.
dehbee 2 years ago
congratulations for the movie, i enjoyed it
UsaBoy91 2 years ago
2:09 - 2:10 my fav!
bluezam 2 years ago
wow! stunning beauty! seriously beautiful wow wow wow
milmiLxX 2 years ago
Very inspiring....thumbs up for Nat Geo.
SonikBlu23 2 years ago
Digital has indeed opened a whole new era for photographers. Gone is the roll of film that had to be processed, so that you could see, the next day, that the ONE perfect shot on the roll was misfocused, or overexposed, or miscomposed. After it was too late to go back and shoot it again.
I couldn't begin to count the "almost perfect" failures I've taken in my life that I could've MADE perfect if I'd seen them right then and made that one little adjustment. Now we can.
anmoose 2 years ago 2
I understand what you are saying. But coming from my perspective (one who is not that enthralled by the digital revolution in film media yet is being dragged kicking and screaming into it) I still love the spontaneity of film. The waiting process is not a drag for me. It is like waiting for xmas day. And sometimes, those mistakes you refer to have actually given me some of my greatest images. I understand the digital revolution and its value. But film still hold a majesty for me.
gadget133 2 years ago
Wow unbelievable
ShepsBush92 2 years ago
When I was a kid we had a subscription to National Geographic. We all read it and sometimes argued over who got to open our clean pristine copy and see the most beautiful photos of the world. That was a ticket out of the Midwest for a few short hours. That is until my brother or sister snatched it from me! LOL
chopin65 2 years ago 2
@chopin65 - I too was a midwestern (farm) kid who discovered the world via the National Geographic. And I didn't just look at the pictures of the bare-breasted tribal women... honest... I swear!
Green4321 2 years ago
i did lol
tristatecomedy 2 years ago
Green4321- ; ) I believe you, honest, I do!
chopin65 2 years ago
I wish I could work for Nat Geo... I wish I could be good enough to work for them The pictures those photographers take are amazing. the things they see are increadible and once in a life time on occasion!
Soulstrifer 2 years ago 2
2:07 evil monkey
tjalolx 2 years ago
TOTAL RESPECT for the photographers who work with Nat. Geographic... just amazing!
DirtyRottenMauroxxx 2 years ago 3
Beautiful pictures
heloisa2lolo4 2 years ago 2
I guess I hadn't really thought about how digital photography has changed our lives. Posting 40 photos from a weekend party on facebook would have been almost impossible 15 years ago (if facebook existed back then, of course). Sometimes I think the casual photos are the best and are the most telling.
GuppyPal 2 years ago
Casually passed out on the couch with 40 empty beers nearby and an overflowing vomit bucket.
D0g63rt 2 years ago
02:04
HOLY CRAP WTF IS THAT
AppA 2 years ago
woops pardon, I meant 02:03 ^_^
AppA 2 years ago
that looks like a close up picture of some kind of 'cell'...seeing it reminds me of the onion cell that I had to look at in bio class...~_~;;;
littIeduck 2 years ago
lol. i did that last week!
tsion10 2 years ago
wow amazing pictures..
Elfavzla 2 years ago
i work at australain geographics and we sell this magazine. its beautiful!
MadelaineButler 2 years ago
The first time I picked up a digital camera, it was the start of something big for me. I have quite a bit of talent. I plan on being a nature photographer when I'm older.
PsychicGirl25 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
typical overly emotional pseudo artist teenage female? nature photographer seems like all of you are either fashion designers or photographers. get real jobs or a better hobby.
JordoSkate101 2 years ago
What the fuck is your problem douche bag? Get a fuckin life and mind your goddamn business.
sean9820 2 years ago
Why do republicans HATE National Geographic?
GOPisTheHypocrisy 2 years ago
mmmm pictures :) I think I like the sense of sight the best. It's awesome.
mathmexican4234 2 years ago
Beautiful
muk546 2 years ago
lol it looks like everyone here in the comments are nerds of photography hahah idk shit ! of what u guys are talking about
yesenia1070 2 years ago
good
alisub 2 years ago
Sean, there are already 21mpix 35 mm digitala, cannon and nikon do them.
nerk909 2 years ago
Amazing photographs!
PlatinumG 2 years ago
man they must be using 500mm lenses.
xxAO2012xx 2 years ago
Digital is great in some regards, but it will never attain the quality of film. A typical 35mm film camera (small in the pro world) is equivalent to 25 mp digital camera.
sean9820 2 years ago
@sean9820 I think those pictures did a good job. I doubt film will beat digital when it comes to top of the line cameras.
katchison 2 years ago
Don't get me wrong, digital provides a very convenient way to capture images, I'm just pointing out that film is the mother of all photography and digital should never get more credit that film.
Another example, a typical 4x5 large format film camera (used for pros) is equivalent to 100 mega pixels!!!
sean9820 2 years ago
@sean9820 They switched to a lot of new technologies too early. I have never actually seen a 100 megapixel digital camera. Also, in many ways VHS's are better than DVD's (not sure about Blu-Ray).
frankjohnson123 2 years ago
wtf are you talking about?
the only diffrence between VHS, DVD, CD, BLu-RAY is the the way its stored.
meaning blu-ray readers/writers have a way smaller laser than DVD or CD and thus can contain huge amount of data.
it has nothing todo with pictures... besides digital cameras hold SD cards. wjhich have speeds as high(er) as 25mb/s thats why you can take pictures fast with high quality.
mitsukai89 2 years ago
That's the basic difference, but each has its own quirks. A DVD player doesn't last NEARLY as long as a VHS one, DVD's (especially Blu-Rays) are very overpriced, DVD's are prone to scratching while a tape can be left out with no problems, and tapes don't freeze up unless something is wrong with the film. Obviously, DVD's have many advantages, but they could have taken more time to perfect these flaws. Also, Blu-Ray discs load faster and have a plastic coating so they last much longer [cont.]
frankjohnson123 2 years ago
[cont.] I agree that digital cameras are much better with the same output, there's just no question. Overall, I prefer digital media a lot more than analog, but there are just some things that digital can't do yet. Given time (probably not long at the rate of technology today), I believe they will address all of those issues. Then comes Skynet :)
frankjohnson123 2 years ago
yeah but a digital camera of that size would outperform a film camera any time. so your point exactly fails
mitsukai89 2 years ago
Hmm well considering no digital camera exists that exceeds the performance of a 35mm small format film camera, your point fails.
sean9820 2 years ago
great pics
stewieworld 2 years ago
that is like some visual orgasm there. =:]
mysteryblack2 2 years ago
FANTASTIC!!!
Lucenablues 2 years ago
SOO CLEEARRR =O
justflamez 2 years ago
oh national geographic I love you since my childhood
LarissaLIBERTY 2 years ago 3
I was just looking stuff up on photojournalism,this just encourages me to want to do it even more.
global2012 2 years ago
Oh joy, I can watch a fucking National Geographic video. Too bad I can't watch the other 8 million videos that I want to see because of some BULLSHIT "This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions"
Colonizing Mars? That looks like an awesome video! TOO BAD I CAN'T FUCKING WATCH IT!
GET YOUR FUCKING SHIT TOGETHER NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC! I LIVE IN CANADA, NOT THE FREAKING MOON! I SHOULD BE ABLE TO WATCH YOUR VIDEOS LIKE ANYONE ELSE! JESUS!
N1ntenOwned 2 years ago 2
You could try using a proxy that has an american identity.
boomkablamo 2 years ago
I have that issue with cnn on youtube .I can watch them on television,but i can't on a public internet site and there from my own country.Not that I really care for cnn,but you get what I mean.
global2012 2 years ago
Why don't you just move to america?
Just kidding, yeah that is annoying as hell.
sean9820 2 years ago
I preferred the old days when the photographer had to make the bear stay still for an hour in order for the photograph to develop.
BinkieMcFartnuggets 2 years ago
lol.
Jackaldoublenine 2 years ago
what about the bears! WHAT ABOUT THE BEARS! They have feelings too!. lol im just kidding but seriously making a bear stand for an hour...thats pretty much why they made digital cameras
egyptianlily 2 years ago
beautiful
chordsandcolour 2 years ago
i read this as "A New Era in Pornography"
Destromath19 2 years ago
Lol someone's horny.
OneAbz1991 2 years ago
stunning pictures. but I dont agree that future is digital. future is analog as well. Just like Mr Sasson said:"imaging is not about technology. it is about pictures."
wexforfilms 2 years ago 3
along with time magazine i think national geographic has some incredible images.
r1ch4rd69 2 years ago
Stunning pictures!
sterlingman 2 years ago
¡excelentes fotos!
laurachiquis23 2 years ago
As usual NatGeo has the best photos.
sleepingmotor 2 years ago
i want to be a national geographic photographer >:[
heartxofxice01 2 years ago 2
wow that's amazing.
TheSnowMiser111 2 years ago 2
What *is* going on at 0:19??
nastrovya 2 years ago
lol she's standing on a stick thats coming out of the wall
strosse 2 years ago
what's going on at 0:19 ?
SthayneLinda 2 years ago