Hear the truth about Muhammad in the Bible - part 1

[Spiritualmindedify]

Muhammad channled his writings from an angel... sounds enough for me not to trust the well written words, the same "unique" writing can be found my many many many people who have channled deities such as aleister crowley, alice baily, Madam Blavatky etc. Plus why is the moon such an important symbol in Islam? I find it interesting that "A" man proclaims these things, not like the bible that was written from different men, in different countries never meeting each other, and fit ALL together

[Spiritualmindedify]

@Spiritualmindedify

Plus they never channled their info!

[1malik1966]

Mohammad is the last prophet , JESUS is a human not a God ...perdiod .

It is not only the muslims that say that , there are hundreds of christian biblical scholars that admit the bible is corrupt and fake ..no one even knows who wrote it ..it is all based on third party account " according to,according to ,according to " .........Please watch and listen to Dr Bart Ehrman on UT " he is a biblical scholar " .

[Tamazizone]

May Allah bless you

[texasman327]

if i accept the muslim religion will i get 72 blowjobs from 72 virgins who shall remain virgins until i blow myself up? did i get that right? the purpose of islam is to blow yourself up so you can have sex in heaven?

[texasman327]

i thnk chris hansen should look into muhammads marriag to a 9 year old.

[texasman327]

it appears that your religion now has legitimacy because it is mentioned 1 time in the bible, and not even in instructional text but a song, A SONG.......you will have to try harder for i cannot be bought with a song.

[jefeisdguard]

Muhammad is NO WHERE IN THE BIBLE!

My challenge to all muslims!

How can Muhammad even be considered to be in the bible if he is NOT-A-PROPHET?

Who can PROVE Muhammads prophethood, biblically?

Did Muhammad come from the lineage of Isaac, whose "seed" ... & ONLY his "seed" was called by God?

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard Yeah, I've been looking for Jesus in the Old Testament without any luck. Maybe you can help.

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

Is it your assumption that maybe you have been looking for Jesus in the Old testament under the name "Jesus"?

You wont find it.

Just as NO ONE .... can find the words: Trinity, science, Muhammad(this would of course would be in regards to Islams alleged prophet who isnt a prophet!), Islam, allah, quran, muslim or the word 'bible'.

Jesus' name is found in the OT! His Hebrew name is Y'shua. Y'shua is found approx 100 times in the Old Testament. Y'shua means "thy salvation".

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard "Jesus' name is found in the OT! His Hebrew name is Y'shua. Y'shua is found approx 100 times in the Old Testament. Y'shua means "thy salvation"."

Now, that may or may not be his Hebrew name, but can you manage to keep the context of any verse that contains that name Y'shua and make it look like it's referring to the Messiah Jesus, son of Mary?

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

Wherever the phrase "thy(or your) salvation(Saviour)" is used in the OT is where 'Yeshua" is interjected as in Isaiah 62:11

Jesus makes countless references as "God". Jesus makes references knowing Moses (John 5:46-47) & Abraham (John 8:56 & 58)

In Matt 4:7 & 10 & Luke 4:8 & 12; Jesus says Hes God & s/b worshiped. James 1:13 states God can NOT be tempted by evil. The devil failed to tempt Jesus. If God is 'good'; then who can prove Jesus isnt? Jesus IS GOOD; there4 Jesus is God

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard I'm not surprised you can't seem to distinguish between being tempted and actually succumbing to the temptation. Jesus was tempted, but didn't succumb. James clearly states God cannot even be tempted, never mind succumbing to the temptation. Also, are you prepared to claim Jesus can be used in Isaiah 62:11? If so, it's horribly misapplied. Luke's misquoting Isaiah 61 in Luke 4:16-19 doesn't help. That's not the only misapplied Messianic prophecy in the New Testament.

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard I find it extremely odd that the book, the Gospel of John, that happens to be shrouded in more controversy than Michael Jackson's private life as to who wrote it, if there were more than one author, where it was written, and when was it written, is frequently used to bolster the claim of a man-god. If I said it was unreliable, I would be giving it too much credit. In fact, not a single Gospel is without controversy. Basically, you're going all-in without ever seeing your cards.

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

Ok, lets go w/what you just said about the gospels, ok? If what U say is true, then how come Islam assumes Muh'd is FOUND in the Gospel of John? Isnt this argument worse for Islam? But not only that, but it is the 'vetting' process of Muhammads prophethood that is in question! How is Muh'd a prophet when the bible doesnt prove him to be one? Now why question gospels authors w/o questioning what they wrote is true? R there "errors, LIES or contradictions" in the words of Jesus?

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard "If what U say is true, then how come Islam assumes Muh'd is FOUND in the Gospel of John?"

I capitalize Jesus' name. I spell it out. Religion aside, at least have some tact. Regarding your claim, Islam assumes nothing. What is mentioned in the Quran is built on conviction and certainty, not anonymous authors and unknown sources. Muslims, not Islam, might allege Muhammad's description is in John, but God knows best who the author of John intended to describe.

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

If muslims assume & Islam doesnt, then what does that tell you about Islams tenets being ignored?

God absolutely DOES know best, right? But which God? Allah who has NO image or NO true name or the bible diety that HAS BOTH?

Whatever is written in the quran is a lie, sorry .... but true. The entire quran is [FABRICATED]. Every last bit! Who can PROVE Jesus spoke as a baby? Or said the words "allah" & muslim? Or any plagiarizd biblical character in the quran from the bible?

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

How did quranic scribes write the quran when all eye witnesses from the bible era have been dead for hundreds & hundreds of years?

''Which is more apt to be historically reliable? A collection of documents (The New Testament), which was written down within the first generation while the eyewitnesses were still alive, or, a book (The Qur'an) written 600 years later, by a man, who had not even any first hand contact with the New Testament?''

-- Dr William Lane Craig

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard "''Which is more apt to be historically reliable? A collection of documents (The New Testament), which was written down within the first generation while the eyewitnesses were still alive, or, a book (The Qur'an) written 600 years later, by a man, who had not even any first hand contact with the New Testament?''

-- Dr William Lane Craig

Dr. Craig said, "...while the eyewitnesses were still alive." Who? Which author sourced an eyewitness or claimed himself to be an eyewitness?

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

Which author claimed he wasnt an eye witness?

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

Sorry, but NOT one of the countless bibles printed are NOT corrupt. All, from the original to the latest copy will tell you Muhammad is NOT from the seed, loins, lineage or descendant of Isaac & is there4 NOT-A-PROPHET ... according to Gen 21:12. God gave ONLY Isaac a 2nd covenant, called ONLY his seed, named isaac personally, promised ONLY Isaac to Sarah & Abraham, called ONLY Isaac Abrahams ONLY son after Ishmael was [CAST OUT] & blessed ONLY Isaac after Abrahams funeral

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard "How is Muh'd a prophet when the bible doesnt prove him to be one?"

That's easy. Michael Jackson's private life is less controversial than the historical textual criticism of the Bible. It doesn't stop with anonymous authors. It includes added/removed words, verses, and even whole books. Evangelical extremists are theologians, not historians. Even when there theology is jeopardized by glaringly obvious facts, they stubbornly cling to there theology.

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

How is your interjection of Michael Jackson proof Muhammad is a prophet? Why are you redirecting our conversation & avoiding this issue? Just explain how Muhammad is a prophet thru Genesis & is a descendant of Isaac. Why are YOU bringing up the authors when YOU can NOT prove what they wrote is wrong? For example: CAN YOU PROVE THERE ARE ERRORS, LIES OR CONTRADICTIONS IN THE WORDS OF JESUS? Prove the authors have written errors, lies & contradictions in the words of Jesus

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard "Prove the authors have written errors, lies & contradictions in the words of Jesus."

Actually, you did that yourself. 1 John 5:7 can't be three completely different verses all at one time. Also, the fact you brought up the point of whether or not God can be seen is interesting. It's a contradiction. God says in one place,."..no man can see me and live," and the next minute, "...the nobles of the sons of Israel;...saw God,"

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

The deceit of Islams creation is complete in you. In Islams indoctrination & propaganda, Islam has to lie & all muslims have to continue the lie & call it truth. In fact, Islams confirms the existence of the Trinity! Islam has replaced God the Father w/allah, our Holy Spirit/comforter/paraclete w/Muh’d & the REAL Jesus w/Eesa(Isa). This Isa was NEVER crucified & spoke as a baby & said the words: allah & muslim which the real Jesus never said!

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard "The deceit of Islams creation is complete in you."

What are you, Yoda?

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

You wrote:

-QUOTE-

God says in one place,."..no man can see me and live," and the next minute, "...the nobles of the sons of Israel;...saw God,"

-UNQUOTE-

So, it is true! You are denying the existence of the HOLY TRINITY!

In God the Father; no man has seen & is why He turned His back in Ex 33:20 otherwise men would die. Yet, Jesus, as YHWH is seen everywhere! & is why the Father sent Jesus in Ex 3:14-15 to us.

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

Dr. Naik ignorantly says every messenger was the way, the truth & the life!

In Islamic doctrine of monotheism, saying: “I am the truth” (al haqq) is equal to saying: “I am God”

There4 Lord Jesus Christ claimed 2B God in John 14:6 B4 allah did, 600 yrs later.

Abu Ameenah Bilal Philips says:

“For any muslim to say Ana al-Haqq; is basically saying ‘I am allah’. So he is giving allah’s attribute of being the embodiment of truth to himself. This becomes shirk by deification”

[jefeisdguard]

Does Jesus LIE? (John 8:46) No. (Hebrews 6:18)

Jesus CONFIRMS THE EXISTENCE OF THE TRINITY!

In the following verse The Holy Spirit is (1), God the Father is (2) & Jesus is (3)

John 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost,(1) whom the Father (2) will send in my name,(3) he(1) shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I (3) have said unto you.

Compliments Matt 28:19, 1 John 5:7, John 10:30 & many others.

Word "Trinity" need NOT appear in the bible

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard "Word "Trinity" need NOT appear in the bible."

You're right. For the most important piece of Christian theology not to ever be mentioned in the entire Bible matters very little. What?

[jefeisdguard]

You wrote:

-QUOTE-

• "The deceit of Islams creation is complete in you."

What are you, Yoda?

-UNQUOTE-

When you parrot deceit parrot lies told & taught to you by Islams indoctrination centers & propaganda courses … you in effect defend Islams 1,400 yr old lies & create more little white lies to defend it! You have NO choice but to lie & it is unfortunate, you may NOT know ur lying … but then how would I know if YOU already know it is all a lie? You have, after all: Al Tekayya

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

You wrote:

-QUOTE-

• "Word "Trinity" need NOT appear in the bible."

You're right. For the most important piece of Christian theology not to ever be mentioned in the entire Bible matters very little. What?

-UNQUOTE-

Muhammad, science, allah, Trinity, bible, Islam, muslim are NOT in the bible; yet are very much evident now, ehhh? Isnt the fact Jesus proves the Trinities existence satisfactory enough evidence in John 14:26, Matt 28:19 & John 10:30?

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

You wrote:

-QUOTE-

Basically, you're an Evangelical extremist who defends a theology not based on sound textual evidence. In other words, conjecture.

-UNQUOTE-

How can YOU know what ‘sound’ textual evidence is when you deny ur own quran is [FABRICATED] w/o a shred of historical or eye witness evidence?

The bible HAS historian, archaeological & eye witness evidence.

Why would anyone convert to Islam that hasn’t ANY EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER?

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard "The bible HAS historian, archaeological & eye witness evidence."

Eyewitness evidence? Mark 14:50, "They all forsook him and fled." Mmm-hmm.

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

**9) Jesus, thru all the pain was STILL thinking of others, said:

***“Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do.” (Luke 23:34)

***“Verily I say unto thee, Today shalt thou be with me in paradise.” (Luke 23:43)

What “replacement” could even think about saying that, in that much ‘pain’?

IT IS HUMANLY IMPOSSIBLE! We all would think about our plight, our life & our death while spasms of unbelievable pain played havoc within our bodies!

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard "***“Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do.” (Luke 23:34)

***“Verily I say unto thee, Today shalt thou be with me in paradise.” (Luke 23:43)"

Actually, John's Gospel says Jesus said, "'It is finished," and Matthew's and Mark's Gospel says He said, "'Eli, eli, lama sabachthani?' that is to say, 'My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" I'm sure you'll find some clever apologetic way to explain that one.

[jefeisdguard]

You wrote: -QUOTE- "***“Father, forgive ...” (Luke 23:34) ***“Verily I say unto thee, Today ….” (Luke 23:43)" Actually, John's Gospel says Jesus said, "'It is finished," & Matt's &Mark's Gospel … 'My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" I'm sure you'll find some clever apologetic way to explain that one. -UNQUOTE- Eye witness testimonies. Others pick up what others miss. Don’t understand Deut 19:15 & Mark 18:16? Why there R 4 witnesses to the murder & brief biography of Jesus

[1malik1966]

@jefeisdguard

Your bible is corrupt , christianity as a whole is fake and corrupt ..may be Dr Bart Ehmran can wake you up ..look him up on YT and make sure to listen to the things he says " he is only one of hundreds of biblical scholars who are 100% sure the bible is a lie " ...if you want to keep dreaming about your astroid pilote be my guest ..but if you want the truth you can find it ..it is out there ....... this is not a game

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

You wrote:

-QUOTE-

"Prove the authors have written errors, lies & contradictions in the words of Jesus."

Actually, you did that yourself. 1 John 5:7 can't be three completely different verses all at one time. Also, the fact you brought up the point of whether or not God can be seen is interesting. It's a contradiction.

-UNQUOTE-

If this is true then explain urself a little better. Extrapolate ur logic into sentences.

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

You wrote:

-QUOTE-

If only your theological views could stand up to historical textual criticism, you may have an argument. But the fact is they don't. Heck, it's not even logical.

-UNQUOTE-

Sorry, it is ONLY Islam that can NOT stand up to historical text. Can YOU prove otherwise? Jesus has enough eye witnesses, historian accounts, authors testimonies & those of family, friends & foes to attest to His crucifixion & resurrection.

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard Basically, you're an Evangelical extremist who defends a theology not based on sound textual evidence. In other words, conjecture.

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

You wrote:

-QUOTE-

"Islam was founded to dispute all of this!"

You damn right! God and Jesus are free from the nonsense you're spewing out.

-UNQUOTE-

Islam was founded by satan & satan conveyed the doctrine to lie to Muh’d thru Gabriel (2 Cor 11:14). Satan needed to create a religion that would dispute the Trinity, the crucifixion & the diety of Jesus. He created “Islam”.

Why else would there be NO witnesses to Muhammad ever having communicated w/either allah or Gabriel?

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

**7) Jesus speaking Gods words: Mark 8:31, 9:31, 10:32- 34 & Luke 9:22, 18:31- 33, 24:7

**8) The prophesies: Isa 53: 3-12, Deut. 18: 15 Moses spoke about Christ and this prophecy was fulfilled in Acts 3: 22-26 & John the Baptist said prophetically: “Behold the Lamb of God which takes away the sin of the world”. (John 1: 29) & John 19:23-24 & 28-29 in NT prophesied in Psalms 22:15, 18 & 59:21 & much much more; prophesies! … to His crucifixion & resurrection; LIARS!

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

**1) historians: • Tacitus • Suetonius • Thallus• Mara Bar-Serapion• Lucian •The Babylonian Talmud • Josephus • Tertullian

**2) Pontius Pilate, the Roman Governor sent to Tiberius Caesar a full report of the crucifixion of Christ

**3) Roman soldiers, John 19:32-35

**4) family: John 19:25

**5) friends: (Mark 15: 42-46), John 19:25-27

**6) enemies of Jesus; the Sanhedrin who were behind all efforts to have Jesus crucified (John 19:15)

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

Islam believes so. Islam calls Jesus a liar thru their ‘created’ Sura 4:157, which disputes Jesus’ words (Matt 26:2 & Matt 20:18-19) of His prophesies to His crucifixion/resurrection. Islam, there4 calls GOD a LIAR here too b/c Jesus spoke the words of God (John 12:49).

In so creating this execrable mendacious Sura … Islam calls the following witnesses LIARS:

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard "Now why question gospels authors w/o questioning what they wrote is true? R there "errors, LIES or contradictions" in the words of Jesus?"

That's exactly my point. There's absolutely no connection between the Gospel authors and Jesus. Not only are the authors anonymous, there sources are unknown. How can we verify if what they wrote was true or not when we don't know who they were or where they got there information from? We definitely wouldn't attribute it to Jesus.

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

How can there NOT be a connection? They were the apostles to Jesus! They were inspired to write down all they had seen, witnessed & what transpired! The very words of Jesus have been clearly protected! There are NO errors, lies or contradicitons to the words of Jesus as there are in the words of "allah"

Allah is a figment of mans imagination created 500 BC from Brahmi sanskrit. This is why allah has NO image! How can a figment of someones imagination have an image?

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard 1 John 5:7 RSV, And the Spirit is the witness, because the Spirit is the truth. 1 John 5:7 KJV, For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. 1 John 5:7, NIV, For there are three that testify: You care to explain the reason for this discrepancy? This doesn't look like the same book you're describing.

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

I still do NOT comprehend the discrepancy you see in 1 John 5:7

Please try to explain further, if you can

In John 14:26, Jesus refers to the Trinity & compliments 1 John 5:7, Matt 28:19 & John 10:30

How can "allah" be the 'truth' when Jesus referred to Himself as "truth" first in John 14:6?

Why did Islams quranic scribes STEAL seven of the 99 attributes from Jesus in the bible?

Why would allah be called the 'resurrection' when ONLY Jesus was crucified & resurrected?

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard "This is why allah has NO image! How can a figment of someones imagination have an image?"

This one I don't get it. Does not the Bible command that "You shall not make for yourself any carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them."? Any image or likening anything to the Creator is absolutely forbidden in the Bible. God is unseen.

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

Genesis 1:26-27 & Gen 9:6 says YHWH-Elohim created us in His own image. Now how is that comparable to "man" making a graven image?

You are telling me you cant tell the two apart? God creating man in His image & man creating idols? Of course what "man" creates is idolatry. B/c man is essentially evil & corruptible in nature. But Genesis refers to man created in the image of GOD! That is different. Allah has NO IMAGE & there4 NOT the same GOD as in the bible! Allahs a pagan diety

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

You say "God is unseen", right? Then how does God appear to man in some bible verses & doesnt in others? In those that God does NOT appear to man satisfies the criteria of John 1:18 which is Exodus 33:20. But the times God DOES appear before man is b/c God, Himself, says so in Exodus 6:3. God appeared B4 Abraham, Jacob & Isaac.

The HOLY TRINITY exists! John 14:26, 1 John 5:7, Matthew 28:19, John 10:30 & other verses proves this!

Islam was founded to dispute all of this!

[tadpoleposition]

@jefeisdguard "Islam was founded to dispute all of this!"

You damn right! God and Jesus are free from the nonsense you're spewing out. If only your theological views could stand up to historical textual criticism, you may have an argument. But the fact is they don't. Heck, it's not even logical.

[jefeisdguard]

@tadpoleposition

You wrote:

-QUOTE-

"The bible HAS historian, archaeological & eye witness evidence."

Eyewitness evidence? Mark 14:50, "They all forsook him and fled." Mmm-hmm.

-UNQUOTE-

God says one need only three witnesses or less to prove:

Dueteronomy 19:15 One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.

Matt 18:16

[tomerlivechen]

מחמדים meant cuteness , translating the entire sentence and not a part of one word , you can see the woman is describing a cute and lovable man.

מחמד without adding any vocalization dots, will often be read as "machmad" which means pet (domestic animal) , only if you add a ו in to the word or a שורוק will it be written מוחמד which is read "mohanad".

learn hebrew grammar before you say miss-leading stuff.

[deltronx2]

mahmad means lovely.. is it right? how did it became mohammed? you mean that the prophets before jesus already know the name of mohammed? somebody answer me please.. thanks

[christianjihadi]

@deltronx2 The correct Hebrew word is "machmadim", it has nothing to do with Muhammed. The "altogether lovely" refers to God or Jesus Christ. The Bible calls God the Husband of Israel and Jesus the bridegroom of the Church.

[deltronx2]

@christianjihadi thanks man..

[lahcenedebbali1]

any personne look this video and not enter to islam i think that personne not good

tanks my brother to this video

[alginet11]

Thanks

جازاكم الله خيرا

[adenking1984]

I like it to, but like gravexx said remove the music.

[gravexx]

nice video

but the music man :\ it should be removed

[spongebob2090]

@gravexx 

your right ..

thanx :)

[spongebob2090]

@gohan22411

Sorry, I thought you were talking to me, and I'm totally agree with you.

And I am sorry that I remove the comment it was by mistake :$

[gohan22411]

i dont see how you can refute something that is still preserved in the book itself. Are you denying what you heard when the rabbi was reciting? 

[spongebob2090]

@gohan22411 No, of course I don't deny it I just upload it for those who deny.. 

[viperfaceX]

@gohan22411 The Info in this video is plainly incorrect. Muhammadim is not a plural of Respect in hebrew, there is no such thing as a plural of respect especially back then!

Thats why no prophet refered to in that way. lol

[gohan22411]

@viperfaceX clearly you dont know Hebrew nor do you know Arabic. You also deny the online translator that translated his name that was written in Hebrew to English as Muhammed (Peace and blessings be upon him).

Peace be upon those who except guidance

[viperfaceX]

@gohan22411 You really mean peace be upon those who accept falsehood, and reject real truth and guidence. :)

[christianjihadi]

@gohan22411 Sounds can be deceiving, especially to those who are not familiar with the Hebrew language. The correct Hebrew word is "machmadim" and has nothing to do with Muhammed. Machmadim is an adjective which describes the male lover in Song of Solomon as "altogether lovely", it is not a noun or name of a man.

[viperfaceX]

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:

Narrated 'Aisha:

“I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.”

[gohan22411]

@viperfaceX what is your point of posting that ahadith.....it has nothing to do with the topic. Every aspect of the last and final Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) has been preserved but only if you had understanding. Do you deny the clear proof that this video has showed you?!?

[viperfaceX]

@gohan22411 These are not proofs, they are falsehoods which have been refuted by many already.

[MrDerxX]

inshaallh

you will enter the heaven and every Muslims

[spongebob2090]

@MrDerxX

thank you

[0509379853]

الله واكبر الله واكبر ظهر الحق وزهق الباطل لا الاه الا الله محمد محمد محمد رسوووووووول الله

[rwadna]

taban lakom wli af3likom stadkholouna  nara khalidina fiha .....

[NaNoOoOo0o0]

يمكرون و يمكر الله و الله خير الماكرين()

[ahmedziny2]

 لااله الا الله

[magiclook23]

allah bless you inshallah.

flickr.com/photos/magiclook

[magiclook23]

allah bless you inshallah.

[spongebob2090]

@magiclook23 

thanx alot

[jlennon555]

the christians lie to themselves lie about JESUS they have nothing to do with JESUS JESUS is not a bleu yed white man of hollywood they are totally ignorents the lies they say about Mohammed and the Quran is in the bible you can read BIBLE atrocities incest crime and so on nop one can ever hide the truth

[sonofyousef]

كلنا هنموت .. وهيبعثنا الله بعد موتنا ... وفى مننا إللى هيضحك وفى مننا إللى هيبكى ... ولكم دينكم ولنا ديننا ... هذه هى الأدلة ... هذه هى الحقيقة ..شئتم أم أبيتم ... إذا أمنتم فلن تنفعونا بشئ .. وإذا كفرتم فلن تضرونا بشئ ... أشهد أن لا إله إلا الله وأشهد أن محمد رسول الله

[tarekmay]

even if he was not mentioned there, if any one used his mind for an hour he will recognize easily that Mohamed is prophet and Islam is the true religion.

[jefeisdguard]

@tarekmay

Take a minute here & help your muslim brethren PROVE the prophethood of Muhammad.

No muslim can PROVE Muhammad is a prophet. If NO muslim can prove the prophethood of Muhammad then Islam is false, allah is false, quran is false, muslims are false & Muhammad is a false prophet as prophesied by Paul in Gal 1:8-9

The only way Muhammad can be proved a prophet is thru Genesis 21:12. God called ONLY the seed of Isaac ... & no one else.