Added: 4 months ago
From: Visualdreamers
Views: 4,359
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (70)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • is it as good as the macpro 8core

  • Comment removed

  • And they all belong in the trash

  • The AMD FX CPU soo awful. If you're gonna buy a new processor, buy Intel. Way better and better for overclocking.

  • AMD THE EPIC returns introducing the AMD FX FAILDOZER with an extra burst of speed when you needed most, with the AMD diesel core technology

  • WHY DO YOU CUT YOUR CONVERSATION ITS FUCKING ANNOYING YOU ACTUALLY THINK ITS COOL ?

  • i like this one the most.

  • it's the world's first *consumer* 8 core CPU, intel already had a xeon 8 core out.

  • @sinephase yes that is a server cpu noob, bevore xenon amd got the opteron with 8 cores

  • @Eaglefly0 no shit tard, why do you think I emphasized the word "consumer"?

  • @sinephase yeah but the most "consumers" arent server users o.O

  • @Eaglefly0 lmao exactly. she said it's the world's first native 8 core CPU, and I corrected her to be more specific. Are you a fucking dunce? Or has your fanboyism made your IQ drop about 50 points?

  • @sinephase ha ha ha i never said that i´m a fanboy i just corrected you, maybe i din´t understand her correctly (maybe because im german) so please STFU or jump off the next bridge ;)

  • @Eaglefly0 - calling me a noob was your first asshat move, not to mention you corrected nothing. Obviously you didn't understand correctly, and I don't give a shit why.

  • she is the matrix!!!

  • Sorry but you have one thing wrong. The FX-8150 is not the worlds first native 8 core CPU. Intel released that in March of 2010 on the server named Beckton, a 8 core CPU using HT. And technically Bulldozer is not 8 real cores, it has a module that has about 180% of 2 real cores.

  • She's Fugly :/

  • @DerHalbeEuro I bet you wouldnt turn her down foo

  • i5 2500k nuff said

  • I love how she cant memorize 1min worth of talking ...

  • the only thing AMD has ever been good for is keeping Intel's chips at a lower price point.

  • Comment removed

  • @julianbautista87 STFU troll

  • @ULT1MATEGAMER just for the lolz, you idiot.

  • @julianbautista87 well she might not have realized that

  • @ULT1MATEGAMER you're right sorry for that, I'm going to delete the comment.

  • lol

  • If you're going to do something, then why not do it right. Intel.

  • Yeah... not gonna state whether i'm getting one or not because the videos are so bad.

  • I honestly really wanted AMD to blow Intel away. Not because I hate Intel, but bcuz they need some major competition. Which helps drive companies to innovate faster, smarter, and cheaper technologies.. AMD has lagged behind for far too long riding the "cheaper" train. And this was their shot to change all that, hell, thats exactly what they even said, "it'll blow everything else away" not just "blow". When I go build a gaming pc, or workstation, I want to be able to consider AMD. so get with it

  • I will never buy another AMD product in my life.

  • @NerdMirage

    That's horribly ignorant.

  • @NerdMirage Not even the GPUs?

  • @xxvi3tboi5o4xx Nope. I just replaced my 5970 with a single GTX 580. No matter what all these benchmarks might say, the GTX 580 is miles ahead of my old 5970 (which is for sale by the way :P)

  • Was like Woot HAWT GURL... but make-up fools me again :( I guess 18 people felt like I ;)

  • Im sorry but is it really THAT hard to record a video without stopping every 3 seconds? I mean your only saying a paragraph.....

    Is this like you trying to get your name out there for a newslady or somethin? at least show that you can say more than one sentence at a time without messing it up....

    Figure out what you're going to say, memorize it, and record it. its simple. The only reason I can see that you need to do this cut, record, cut, record bs is bcuz u have no idea what youre talkin about

  • @JTMarch86

    don't take your anger out on her, take it out on AMD, who have once again failed the consumer

  • @hismindovermatter Im not taking my anger out on her at all. The issues are completely separate. But stopping a camera after every sentence... is annoying and unprofessional, and yes I know this is just youtube, but by the way she has the rest of her setup.. is says "trying to be professional".

  • the fx 8150 in the netherlands cost 259,00 euro`s, the 2500k cost 192,90 and the 2600k cost 274,00

  • Too much Botox man!!

  • AMD is shit, it cant even beat a 2500k which is $50 cheaper

  • @sculptfx If you cared to look at any of the reviews done my non-benchmarking dumbshits you would see that their is a bug in Windows 7 that reduces the performance of the Bulldozer by nearly 40-50%. Currently AMD and Microsoft are working on making a driver to fix this issue, which will make the Bulldozer compare to nearly i7 xtremes

  • @ThePhuzz you must be really naive to buy such bs. AMD has had access to windows 7 with their bulldozer cpus for over a year. Now that they have finally released them you're trying to blame the OS, lol. I was going to buy a bulldozer but I decided to wait for reviews and benchmarks. I have yet to see any reliable benchmarks that favor the AMD FX chip. I know its hard for you to except and I don't take any pleasure in bashing AMD but they failed again.

  • @sculptfx Have you not compared the CPU benchmarks on a W7 OS platform vs. those of a Ubuntu/Linux OS Platform? You will see a huge increase in performance. Heavy research in the 990 chip boards have shown that their is a Bug in current Windows 7 operating systems caused by a driver. Their is in fact a group of researchers who have hacked into the mainframe of the W7 Bios and have altered it, in which the performance gain is literally 40-50%. Please do your research via google.

  • @ThePhuzz

    I got a unicorn.

  • @sculptfx espere que microsoft saque el controlador en Windows 7 para sacarle todo su poder a AMD FX y asi se meta culo arriba a su intel i7 2600k y asta el intel i7 Extreme

  • You idiot :L Its cheaper than a 2500k (in the uk) and trounces it :L Its also considerably cheaper than 2600k (which it also beats... you douche). Even intel is worried and is launching the 2700 series processors to get the one up as it were :L If you hate it you reli are a brand snob :L

  • Comment removed

  • @DjAlyX1 rofl. this cpu is like a joke dude. go look at some real benchmarks and say that again. Intel isn't worried, theyre laughing their asses off wondering how AMD could drop the ball THIS bad.... I mean come on, a 8 core cpu that can't even beat a 2500k quad core?.....

    hows this. 8150 overclocked to 5.0 only gets a 7.28 on Cinebench!!!!

    the 2600k at 5.0 gets over 10.... and its only 4 cores...

    Dj, its obvious you don't know a thing about this, so stop talking out of ur ass

  • @JTMarch86 dude cinebench is fucking designed to support ht better than bulldozer atm :L If only they hadnt had diverted from their original gameplan and released the 8130p which trounced the 2600k even in every respect :/ and clearly you know jack shit :L the 8150 is admittedly very disappointing however it is not the cpu at fault here, its the damn software support :L Ive seen it run on unbuntu and linux and trash everything bar a 980x :L its unfortunate amd has made asses of themselves :L

  • @DjAlyX1 It really is funny hearing all these AMD fanboys trying to make the cpu sound like anything but a complete failure.. it really is. "its the softwares fault" ..."Windows codes for Intel cpus.." its bullshit. AMD knows exactly what software is out there, and has had PLENTY of time to test on it and FOR it. You don't make something that will only be of good use in 5 years..,. that sux now.. bcuz in 5 years when software catches up, there will be cpus that trounce this.

  • @DjAlyX1 Oh and don't go start telling people they don't know what they're talking about when you're the one with no clue, and your opinions are sooo obviously biased its sad. I've got over 5 certifications and 2 computer degrees under my belt. I understand what it was built for, and how it even works. And it doesnt matter what bench u throw at it, whether you says its for ht or what... its just a simple fact of it just not performing in today's standards, and there is no excuse for that. none.

  • @JTMarch86 YOU STUPID ASSWIPE :L I just said its not performing as it should :L I know it's disappointing but even you should know on paper you jackass it wipes the 2600k clean off the paper :L I have a 2600k for goodness sake :L and an old amd 955 pc :L you can throw your education shite at me all day but honestly im sat kind of wondering what we're even arguing about :L because I just gave you a two way argument and you go on about everything else :L Tbh I was disappointed with my 2600k too!

  • @DjAlyX1 lol ok....someone needs to take their xanax...

    anyways, paper doesn't matter at all, what matters is real world uses. And currently, the only thing I can see this chip is good for (without some type of improvement) is possibly large servers that can use a lot of multi threaded apps, but I'm not even sure I'd choose this over an Opteron.

  • @DjAlyX1 oh and also, that was EXACT:Y what led to an even bigger disappointment; AMD saying it would wipe the floor with the 2600k, but in all honesty, it doesn't wipe the floor with even the 2500k. And you should be able to admit that. There are of course some areas where the 8150 does better, but the majority goes to the 2500k. So until AMD gets their head out of their asses, I'll stick with Intel. (unless I need a really cheap pc)

  • @JTMarch86 Well tbh in the uk the lack of a price difference just means its either a 2500k or an 8150 cos most are nearly identical and for the majority of games ive seen running a 8150 with a gtx580 somehow out performs the 2500k which is still beyond me :L AMD have made a bad mistake with the 8150 and shouldnt have gone and revised the cpu.. (cos before it was genuinely outperforming the 2600k) :L In time they'll right their wrong (I hope) cos reviving the FX name has taken the piss a bit :L

  • @DjAlyX1 hmm.. well noone really knows what it "was before" or if it was exactly this and people were just lieing for the hype... who knows. But I can say this, the 8150 has some advantages over the 2500k. but I'm sorry, gaming isn't one of them. If you want to see some real world proof type: QUkvhOhrDVk in the youtube search. Linus did a 2500k vs 8150 lineup in current games, and the 8150 didn't outdo it in any way, actually lost by 8-20% at all times... But I hope AMD gets this fixed too

  • Comment removed

  • Its not realy an 8 core cpu....its like 1,5 core per module...piece of crap..

  • less editing

  • yes, u r hot, and AMD is piece of crap.

  • I'm going to sub just because u are hot!!!

  • FX-8150 FAILED TO DEFEAT 2600K SAW PASSMARK BENCHMARK SITE

  • I think this show is a piece of crap. Buy the stuff insted of talking about them all the time, benchmark it ,and then you will receive more subscribers.

  • and the thing is a piece of crap

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more