Added: 2 years ago
From: richkid639
Views: 6,573
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (82)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this is BS!!. see how Satan deceives people into believing they were evolved from monkeys?.

  • @Swackers90 Hahahaha....seriously?

  • @Gn00bie to be autistic or to have any mental health issue is man made with the chemicals they put in our food air and cleaning supplies

  • The black human is so close in features to that of an Ape or whatever already...even today....so that find doesn't mean much when they compare it to original human ancestors. We still may not have come from apes even though we share simular features. Thats like saying the Sun and the Earth are both round and have things orbiting them....so therefore the Earth was once a Sun or the Sun was once a planet people lived on. I think Humans were original in form and given life by a higher being.

  • @Gn00bie +1

  • This only proves that science has been wrong and are probably still wrong. The bible says that Noah only took 2 of each kind of animal on the ark. Besides, there is no spine that was found and the pelvis was shattered so badly that it could have been put back together wrong. How could use even deduce this creature could stand based upon this? Science has to be repeatable find me Ardi's mate and some of her kids and maybe I'll believe this Evolution Propaganda.

  • @DBBibleTalk i believe in some things in the bible but most is made up by the government and past humans trying to lead off the right path dont get me wrong there is a god or what you call god out there but its not a bearded man in a robe

  • @kramno

    "I don't accept anyone proposing magic to be "scientists" "

    you will have to unravel this mystery for me.

    "since the scientific method seeks repeatable results in clinical environments for it's facts"

    then you accept that common ancestry has not got the proof that you say science seeks. i appreciate your honesty.

    Unless you witnessed & recorded an apelike ancestor morphing into a human?

    or a rodent like creature morphing into a whale?

    i expect u will maintain ur scientific integrity

  • @kramnosdivad

    "All scientists(I.D.ers & Creationists are the same group) "

    ignorance knows no bounds.

    tell me why they are the same group.

    then i will tell you why Lamarckians & darwinists are the same group.

    then why Darwinian gradualism is the same as punctuated equilibrium.

    lol

  • @kramnosdivad "Evolution is evolution" wrong. Evolution is a most overused term that means so many different things that its ridiculous. If you want to reduce the meaning of the term to 'change' then its not even a theory is it? "The Theory of Change" like Duh! Change is a proven fact! Der! Creationists dont accept change! what the....???? Creatures change by natural selection! wow Hitler used change to kill people? i dont think so.
  • @kramnosdivad

    you might have your experiments confused.

    Abiogenesis experiments were done by Miller Urey.

    many other hypotheses are forth coming....none of which have effectively recreated life or even the basic building blocks in a form that can survive.

    regards

  • @kram

    Watson and Crick were James D. Watson & Francis Crick who, using x-ray diffusion data collected by Rosalind Franklin, proposed the double helix or spiral staircase structure of the DNA molecule in 1953.

    The Human Genome Project (HGP) was an international scientific research project with a primary goal to determine the sequence of chemical base pairs which make up DNA and to identify and map the approximately 20k-25k genes of the human genome from both a physical and functional standpoint

  • @kramnosdivad

    "Hitler did use evolution"

    no he did not. He never used the change in gene frequencies of animals for anything.

    what he did use was Darwin's theory that we are all animals & that evolution is taking us towards superior intelligence from simplistic creatures. If some creatures are simple & some complex then the mentally retarded are weak & should be eliminated from the gene pool. They will be eventually so y not speed it up?

    look up eugenics or social darwinism

    regards

  • @kramno

    "Please explain?"

    All scientists, naturalistic & creationist & ID ones accept evolution by natural selection as fact.Creatures wil inherit the traits of its parents and the parents that have survived will reproduce more. Populations will tend to strengthen in the direction of the traits that allowed them to survive. Its not rocket science.

    where naturalistic & creationist scientists differ is in their belief that this mechanism can explain how all lifes diversity came from 1 ancestor.

  • @kramnosdivad

    "Evolution makes no claims about the origin of life. Only what happens after."

    in that case the amount of scientists who dont 'believe' in it is nil.

    however you will find that evolution is not just the study of life changing but it incorporates a view that all life came from one ancestor. the question must be asked where that one ancestor came from?

    Evolutionists believe that abiogenesis explains this.

    to hide away from the facts is pointless.

  • very entertaining stuff.

    i love the pictures with the soft tissue showing hairy face and body.

    would any of the true believers like to tell me how they know what that looks like?

    1.40 "from the beginning we used chimpanzees & gorillas as our stand ins ...for our last common ancestor...we cant do that anymore!"

    translation: we made up a story about common ancestry & now we even believe we were wrong. sure we were told that by creationists....but they are crazy....now we know we are right..lol

  • Hiltler used evolution to kill the jews. Where the theory of evolution fails is the orgin of life. We all came from one single cell that evolved from nothing oh give me a break. One single cell is 10 times more complex then a car and we don't believe cars evolved from nothing? something created us it's just dum obviousness.

  • @IlovemySavior100

    "Hiltler used evolution to kill the jews."

    he didnt use evolution to kill the Jews but he believed that eliminating inferior races was aiding the process of evolution as the germans were the master race (read superior ie others inferior).

    His views can be justified by the theory of evolution and could never be justified by christianity.

  • Hiltler used evolution to kill the jews. Where the theory of evolution fails is the orgin of life. We all came from one single cell that evolved from nothing oh give me a break. One single cell is 10 times more complex then a car and we don't believe cars evolved from nothing? something created us it's just dum obviousness.

  • @IlovemySavior100 so god did it? then where did god come from? and did he do it? a biogenesis have actually produce live from non-life, and it worked. so idk what ur talking about

  • Comment removed

  • This is such an exciting time for ALL of humanity and yet another incredible find!!! I LOVE learning about the Facts of Evolution and knowing the Truth how we evolved as a species. Such a beautiful process:)

  • The evolution by natural selection does not explain origin of life.

    It explains how God gave a limited capacity for species to change under different circumstances and dominate in some environment.He has full record of everything

  • It is a beautiful process - and if it were not, I'm sure the Lord would cause it to cease. (lol)

    This Truth you speak of also has one other great attribute: It shakes off the shackles of fear and ignorance for all of mankind.

    That - for me - is most precious.

    Three thousand years of murder in the name of God will now end for the majority of humanity and condemnation of a fellow human being will be smoke that is blown away by the curiosity of little children.

  • The religion stops people from committing murder except when it is done for just cause : for punishment by a state of a culprit, but the murders committed by disbelievers is a scourge for humanity.read the stories of murders committed by communists and politicians:Do they commit it for God?

  • The reason Islamists are attacking the West at this very moment is due to Six Crusades sponsored - sanctified - and lead by Christians.

    Please do not attempt to convince me that God's Law means anything more than a leader's immediate manipulation of a local population. The whole premise was a lie, is a lie, and will always be a lie to obtain wealth and control from and over fellow human beings.

    If that were not true then Columbus wouldn't have claimed the New World for the Church.

  • Christians did sponsor crusades but the nain reason was oil .

  • That is simply stupid: The first Five Crusades were blessed by the Holy Pope in Rome.

    Are you smoking crack?

  • So even if they were not christians they would have done it the very same way.The war is for greed, not for religion.The illuminati mispresent religion

  • God is the one who gave living things the capability to ADAPT.That is what evolutionists classifye as a fact of evolution.You are boasting prematurely.The things went in reverse direction when Big-Bang was discovered .But blinds cannot understand yet.

  • You need to educate yourself.

    Adaptation is related to trial and error - modifying behavior and the use of tools.

    Physical transformations are evolutionary. Ardi didn't adapt itself into another form. You're speaking foolishly because of a lack of information and, obviously a lack of intellect.

    Put down the propaganda and open your eyes. We have the rocks - you have your supposed faith.

  • Ardi was a HUMAN species.

    It was not seen to evolve from anything else :D

    No evidence.Humans are humans.

    Just to produce evidence Piltdown man was created .

  • Okay - I'm attempting to deal with an idiot, obviously.

    You are doing exactly what all religious nutcases end up doing when evidence pushes them into a corner, so I'm going to end this exchange right here and now.

    You're not going to suck any more of my life away. Sorry - but your simply pathetic.

  • @DarwinsFriend

    I am also dealing with an evolutionist nut who is having faith in fairy tale of abiogenesis.

  • But abiogenesis has been reproduced in laboratories. Search for the Miller-Urey experiment, you might learn something.

  • Atharkas

    That was formation of some RNAs.

    There is a lot more in abiogenesis.

    There has to come up proteins and DNAs and also there has to be a coordination for replication of each.

    Beyond this there is supposed to be aggregation of cells into tissues with each cell being aware of other cell as they all will be interacting with each other.

    Then there are interaction among species and living things.

    Life is far more complex

  • But with the formation of such proteins, it is possible to go toward more complex lifeform. Just like any living being, from generation to generation a "mistake" may happen and it might form a slightly different matter. Just like when the cells developt a membrane which protected them.

  • Atharkas

    The problem with this "mistake" part is that it has to continue to be productive.

    Suppose an engineer attempts to design a structural analysis computer program, writing it in a machine language that is totally unknown to him. He simply types out random characters at his keyboard, and periodically runs tests on the program to recognize and select out chance improvements when they occur. The improvements are permanently incorporated into the program while the other changes are discarded.

  • Do remember, throught the different eons of earth, there were several occurence of extinctions, as I said earlier, some cells developted a protective membrane which allowed them to survive throught one of such extinctions. The productive part often occurs when the organism has to survive. Yes, it is random and often depending of the ares where the species live. A good exemple of that is the nylonase.

  • Atharkas If bacteria started surviving the environment containing nylon by developing nylonase that does not mean that children left in scarcity of food will develop chlorophyll.

    The bacteria are the scavengers for our earth and have better capacity to change their genetic makeup than the so called more developed living things.

  • But it indicates that to survive some forms of life evolves to do unexpected things. For humans, it would rather go like it did for some of the tribes that died off in the islands (Palau per instance) where, due to the lack of large quantities of food, they became smaller in stature, thus, demanding less food. We wouldn't developt clorophyl, we are not philoplanktons after all.

  • Atharkas

    The property of adaptation is a quality given to us from God for some deviation in circumstances.

    This does not change our species.

  • Ah, so you admit changes depending of circumstances happens. Then you can agree that, if over many eons, two group of animals changes in a way to make them compleately incompatible, it will be impossible for them to breed and thus result into new species. (That is observable even today and is what brought Darwin's theories).

    Also, the fact that you admit that we can change disprove the saying that God made us in his image, thus, removing God from the picture.

  • Atharkas CONTD

    If our engineer continues this process of random changes and testing for a long enough time, could he eventually develop a sophisticated structural analysis program? (Of course, when intelligent humans decide what constitutes an "improvement", this is really artificial selection, so the analogy is far too generous.)

  • @preachersaredumb

    So start with the beginning

    Which one came first DNA,RNA or Proteins?

    They all need each other to replicate RIGHT ?

  • Thanks for all your comments, had to grab the camera quick so it was not my best recording. but show you that we are old us Humans. older than we think. thanks

  • I just wonder how religions in all kind comment on this. Is religions belief nearing end?

  • h t t p : / / w w w . ridgecrest . ca . us /~do_while/sage/newsletters . htm

    Visit this website to get some useful information.

    You need to remove spaces

  • Oh Man, that is such a sad little site.

    The most hilarious comment was the "1,000 piece puzzle" example. I'm sorry you are stuck, mentally, where you are. I don't really care all that much, but it is sad anyway.

    I hope you get to have your brain back someday, because someone else has it presently.

    It still amazes me that some folks can not see that real science constantly questions itself and given complete peer review - is willing to change its perspective freely.

    Religion never does.

  • @DarwinsFriend

    Religion did not need to tell about origin of life.Nor did evolution say any such thing.

    Evolution by way of natural selection supposed that the individual predominate as per their ability to survive the changing environment.This is God-Gifted phenomenon which exists per se and does not explain existence of life on earth.

  • @DarwinsFriend

    Religion will ultimately win when everything is discoveredt.

    Atheism will fail at the end but will take its toil before it will collapse.

  • No, actually, if mankind doesn't blow itself up beforehand - science will be refined to the point where all the pieces/gaps/doubts are filled in and answered.

    The childish fantasy that "We are created in His image" will be laughed at in less than a hundred years and the threat of condemnation in the afterlife will evaporate like a nasty fart.

    This is why the Old Testament wasn't good enough for Christians (funny, it's just fine for the Jews) and 'the human connection' (Jesus)

    in the New book.

  • The people who dont want to believe and follow God's laws try to change it and once it is altered to thepoint that it is difficult to differentiate what is from man and what is from God, God sent another revelation , the last one being Qur'an

  • Thats is your opinion.

    Some people dont ever feel the need to even concern themselves about a Creator they are raised in a non-threatened way and educate themselves about reality.

    They realize theres nothing in the dark that isnt there in the light.

    They dont have the need to dominate their children with stories of agonizing death and jumping from hot rock to hot rock, for eternity.

    That act is little better than child molestation.

    Maybe worse.

  • DarwinsFriend

    That's the way to demean the followers of religion.

    The fact is that some people are sincere to their existence and question for it and search.Those who did not read scriptures keep denying them with closed eyes.

  • You know what I said about the molestation of the minds of little children is the truth - you were raised under the same stone.

    It is a black lie - used to do nothing to instill fear and control. Institutional slavery and socially acceptable until now.

    Now we come into the truly Modern Age - without your pointless guilt or fear. Know that your kind won't be swept away by progress of the human spirit, but simply ignored & allowed to wither.

    I'd feel sorry for your ilk, but it's not worth it.

  • Regardless of this astounding find....The question still remains the same. Where did everything we and the universe are made of come from? Chemicals,minerals,oxygen, H20,atoms etc... had to come from somewhere..and if it was a god or an alien or whatever YOU want to call it..who or what made them. Personally I find the whole thing fascinating.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more