We need to worry about government, whether local, state, or federal, when it says that they can LIMIT gun rights, or REGULATE guns. Because if they can limit gun ownership, sooner or later, it'll be to the point where only a FEW GOVERNMENT APPOINTED PEOPLE can own a firearm.
And the rest of us? Disarmed and subjugated to the will of a dictatorship.
Despite Europe's messed up ways and popular opinion, we must stick to the CONSTITUTION.
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes . . . Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
I am so glad to see that Americans are starting to challenge these dictators on the power hungry attempt to dis-arm the good Americans. Why should we ever trust the anti-gun movement to protect our children?
Most of the crimes that are commited with a firearm are usually somebody who was convicted of a felony-let out of prison-then go out and do it again! Its the revolving door of the justice system that should be looked at, not the gun! Its the criminals that are let out of the system only to do it again and again! Anyways, most of the crime is caused by the gang banging, drug dealing, mind warped rap music listening, brain washed idiots that glamorize death-crime-animal like behavior!
The last comment was ridiculous..."Let guns roam the streets free"?
Guns don't roam the streets...they require someone to bring them along on the trip.
Criminals by their nature will never abide by any gun control law in the first place; and considering that the only people to abide by said laws are the good law abiding folks, then it only stands to reason that the only people that will be restricted by said laws are the good folk.
It's interesting how folks tend to decide in favor of some form of gun control when applied to others, but when the question is turned to ones own rights, ahh then it is an outrage. Well, the second amendment carries weight folks, and it has not one damn thing to do with hunting or target shoot.
The old lady isn't all that historically informed which is ironic given her age. The times our forefathers were thinking of was likely much worse. They found this issue important enough to make it the 2nd Amendment. That's pretty high on the priority list. They also did it keeping in mind that the citizens should have power. There was an old philosopher's quote, "Long live the government that fears its own people."
Likely not - especially considering the insanity of the laws. Like in California, it's illegal to have a clip that can hold 15 rounds, so you can only have 10. Great - is the criminal now going to not murder someone because he'd can only shoot someone 10 times? Of course not.
I wish I could get my guns to roam the woods and kill my venison for me! Where do I get one of these guns that walks and shoots itself?
nktank84 4 months ago
criminals don't follow laws!! doesn't anybody get it!
islandoffroadracing 5 months ago
I don't think the old woman at :52 realizes that she would suddenly be in one of the highest victim groups if guns were banned.
shananagans5 1 year ago
Guns roam the streets in Philadelphia? My guns don't have legs or even the coordination to stand up by themselves!
malone23kid 1 year ago
We need to worry about government, whether local, state, or federal, when it says that they can LIMIT gun rights, or REGULATE guns. Because if they can limit gun ownership, sooner or later, it'll be to the point where only a FEW GOVERNMENT APPOINTED PEOPLE can own a firearm.
And the rest of us? Disarmed and subjugated to the will of a dictatorship.
Despite Europe's messed up ways and popular opinion, we must stick to the CONSTITUTION.
LET FREEDOM RING, like DavyCrockett2 said!!!
pavs04 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes . . . Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
-Thomas Jefferson
Scotty7617 3 years ago 2
I am so glad to see that Americans are starting to challenge these dictators on the power hungry attempt to dis-arm the good Americans. Why should we ever trust the anti-gun movement to protect our children?
Fockersnextdoor 3 years ago 2
Most of the crimes that are commited with a firearm are usually somebody who was convicted of a felony-let out of prison-then go out and do it again! Its the revolving door of the justice system that should be looked at, not the gun! Its the criminals that are let out of the system only to do it again and again! Anyways, most of the crime is caused by the gang banging, drug dealing, mind warped rap music listening, brain washed idiots that glamorize death-crime-animal like behavior!
poopster77 3 years ago 5
I'll carry a gun, a cop is too heavy.
Ataxicabdriver 3 years ago 3
TO ALL LIBERAL FAGS: 6/26/2008 The day that the DC gun ban was struck down and the real definiton of the 2nd amendment was defined!
Mark it down bitches! The days of your "follow the popular opinion" and "try to be European" fagness are over!
LET FREEDOM RING! (a.k.a. fuck liberals)
DavyCrockett2 3 years ago 14
The last comment was ridiculous..."Let guns roam the streets free"?
Guns don't roam the streets...they require someone to bring them along on the trip.
Criminals by their nature will never abide by any gun control law in the first place; and considering that the only people to abide by said laws are the good law abiding folks, then it only stands to reason that the only people that will be restricted by said laws are the good folk.
No restrictions should be allowed
"Shall not be infringed"
peckerwood321 3 years ago 8
It's interesting how folks tend to decide in favor of some form of gun control when applied to others, but when the question is turned to ones own rights, ahh then it is an outrage. Well, the second amendment carries weight folks, and it has not one damn thing to do with hunting or target shoot.
seneca67 3 years ago 3
The old lady isn't all that historically informed which is ironic given her age. The times our forefathers were thinking of was likely much worse. They found this issue important enough to make it the 2nd Amendment. That's pretty high on the priority list. They also did it keeping in mind that the citizens should have power. There was an old philosopher's quote, "Long live the government that fears its own people."
AdamSonOfJohn 3 years ago 3
Has there ever been a case of gun control laws reducing crime in the US?
RetSquid 3 years ago
Likely not - especially considering the insanity of the laws. Like in California, it's illegal to have a clip that can hold 15 rounds, so you can only have 10. Great - is the criminal now going to not murder someone because he'd can only shoot someone 10 times? Of course not.
AdamSonOfJohn 3 years ago