Sorry, limey trash. Our elected officials are responsible ONLY to our citizens for their official acts. They are NOT answerable to any foreign sack of shit like you, Galloway, or the clowns at the Hague.
@weegiebam "so you can be cunts when and where you like, because that's what cunts do? COOL STORY, CUNT."
No, maggot. Because as a sovereign nation, we can't afford to allow our elected officials to be intimidated by ANY foreign power. That means that they must be protected after they leave office. Which means that what you and Gallery are advocating must be considered as a hostile act, possibly an act of war.
First of all: it was a conflict, not a war. The last time the United States was in a "literal" war (that the world community said "okay!" to) was between 1941-1945, get it right. Second: alright, then lets start talking about how we should try the UN for the Korean War, JFK for the Bay of Pigs, LBJ and Nixon for Vietnam, and Bush Sr. for the Gulf War, because those were all conflicts where the United States (and the world) has exerted its influence yet no one says those were acts of war crimes.
Wrong questions being asked. Ask all the participants if they are pro capitalism. If they say yes then they are all in favour of an economic system that by it's very nature has to exploit. A profit motivated system that needs to exploit for profit inevitably leads to war in a fight over resources,in this case oil, hidden by the smoke screen that we only invaded to help the people.
The USA, the UK, and Iraqi governments are/were insane. We have insane nations going to war with insane nations, all in the name of an insane capitalist system of economics. Sadly the working classes as per usual suffer.
Bush and Blair were leaders of bourgeois governments. They were supported by the powerful capitalists, these capitalists wanted to control oil rich regions and their resources. The capitalist system will clear them, powerful money people are behind the scene.
Latelly ive been asking my self the same are they? Should they been take to court becouse the mistake or the fake reason that took this 2 presidents to attact Iraq.
Isnt anought the destruction caused in Iraq, the increase of antiamerican feelling, the collateral damage, the criminals acts been having place in Iraq?
Sorry, limey trash. Our elected officials are responsible ONLY to our citizens for their official acts. They are NOT answerable to any foreign sack of shit like you, Galloway, or the clowns at the Hague.
XNMR53 3 weeks ago
@XNMR53 so you can be cunts when and where you like, because that's what cunts do? COOL STORY, CUNT.
weegiebam 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
XNMR53 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@weegiebam "so you can be cunts when and where you like, because that's what cunts do? COOL STORY, CUNT."
No, maggot. Because as a sovereign nation, we can't afford to allow our elected officials to be intimidated by ANY foreign power. That means that they must be protected after they leave office. Which means that what you and Gallery are advocating must be considered as a hostile act, possibly an act of war.
XNMR53 3 weeks ago
First of all: it was a conflict, not a war. The last time the United States was in a "literal" war (that the world community said "okay!" to) was between 1941-1945, get it right. Second: alright, then lets start talking about how we should try the UN for the Korean War, JFK for the Bay of Pigs, LBJ and Nixon for Vietnam, and Bush Sr. for the Gulf War, because those were all conflicts where the United States (and the world) has exerted its influence yet no one says those were acts of war crimes.
guitarguy476 3 months ago
Wrong questions being asked. Ask all the participants if they are pro capitalism. If they say yes then they are all in favour of an economic system that by it's very nature has to exploit. A profit motivated system that needs to exploit for profit inevitably leads to war in a fight over resources,in this case oil, hidden by the smoke screen that we only invaded to help the people.
DrMontague 3 months ago
The USA, the UK, and Iraqi governments are/were insane. We have insane nations going to war with insane nations, all in the name of an insane capitalist system of economics. Sadly the working classes as per usual suffer.
DrMontague 3 months ago 2
Bush and Blair were leaders of bourgeois governments. They were supported by the powerful capitalists, these capitalists wanted to control oil rich regions and their resources. The capitalist system will clear them, powerful money people are behind the scene.
DrMontague 3 months ago
Latelly ive been asking my self the same are they? Should they been take to court becouse the mistake or the fake reason that took this 2 presidents to attact Iraq.
Isnt anought the destruction caused in Iraq, the increase of antiamerican feelling, the collateral damage, the criminals acts been having place in Iraq?
JUANMMBC 3 months ago
USA and the UNITED KINGDOM are OIL JUNKIE''S !!!
par2765 3 months ago
UN didn't approve the bombing of Yugoslavia 1999 and Clinton or Blair haven't being prosecuted. And what has happened till this day - nothing!
dojchin 3 months ago 2