"Ossie Motor" Can Run Indefinately On Same Battery!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[w23trhfyer]

coils produce some form of "free heat"?, because this would be really free energy on a larger scale ... What do you think?

[spikesterg]

what will you be doing with your invention/discovery? What are the implications?

[KrisBlueNZ]

Aha yep this'll be the first _real_ perpetual motion machine :-)

The 'scope trace will impress some - those who were impressed by the flashing lights and tape spools of "computers" in old low-budget sci-fi.

This video proves nothing. The indications could easily be faked, but even without assuming malicious intent, they prove nothing.

Have you actually run the motor indefinitely? Do you know how long that would take? :-)

How long would it run for using a large capacitor instead of a battery? LOL

[Texmurphy51]

If this actually runs on its own power you could parallel a capacitor with the battery, then once running remove the battery. Then see how long it runs.

[DadHav]

If you can tune this specifically to run indefinitely then why not do that and show us a current reading with 5 or 6 decimal places and a small capacity battery. Something that will show us whether or not there is a current drain or gain, or better yet a capacitor. If you can do this or direct me to a link where this is proven I would be very grateful.

John

[DadHav]

PS. Naudins demonstration ended with a caption that said the Ossie motor was efficient but not self running or over unity. I would love nothing more than to see enough proof of concept to believe this motor will run indefinitely. I would love to make one myself but I want to see the claims backed up first. Except the challenge and show the voltage of a small battery or capacitor staying the same. I use a capacitor or a small capacity battery for my tests as well as a 5 digit voltage reading.

J

[JmanNo42]

If true overunity to be proven one would have to build a chain of serial OU devices acting like energy vessels feeding eachother once the initial current from battery or applied force to rotor is removed.

So if you have the skill why not build another one, to be fed by this one and to give feedback back to this one.

JT

[ingesumadre]

but thats on ac? is in it?

[ke4uyp]

Here is some more food for thought a resistor takes electrical energy and permanently converts it to heat. This single fact alone guarantees that you can not achieve Over Unity. Every inch of wire that is connected to the motor has resistance just like a resistor so there is even more electrical energy permanently converted to heat. All of the electrical connections have resistance so there is even more electrical energy permanently converted to heat. By the Way did I mention friction.

[SPAGHETTIMONSTER1]

resistance=friction=heat, yeah i think you did., course i could be wrong.

[ke4uyp]

OK time for a reality check this video proves absolutely nothing. Look at all the clutter around the motor it is impossible to verify the power source to this motor. No. 2 without a working load on the motor these tests are invalid. No. 3 at no time in the video is there any mention of the torque output of the motor or the voltage and amp input.

[wopwops0482]

Will there be any more videos? What happened?

[skycollection]

this is not a decoration piece, it is technology....! you have to think that is not easy to make this device....! is a good work.

[myztic123]

Even if it could run indefinitely, what other use than for decoration is a turning wheel?

[jonasthornvall]

Have you all checked out skycollections rig, it would be frictionless in space.

This is nice to but it doesn't blow my mind.

Search for SAM and skycollection

[jonasthornvall]

Have you all checked out skycollections rig, it would be frictionless in space.

This is nice to but it doesn't blow my mind.

[shubus]

.Ossie, this is superior work. If you really think you have OU here, then you must do a rundown test from a charged cap--no battery.

[debrainwasher]

shubus, capacitors will never work in OU devices, since they are only able to store electrical energy (We) according to the equation We=CU²/2 - but can't store human belief energy (Wb). Hence a battery is mandatory.

(\_/)

O_o

[shubus]

What a quaint formula! I've been laughing at this for 3 hours.

[overunitydotcom]

What about mechanically slowing the motor down a bit with a small mechanical load ?

Maybe you can show this maybe scratching a paper on the rim for 30 seconds and show the the changing input current and voltages ?

Many thanks.

[Axle0001]

Ossie,

I do not mean to be a distraction from what you are doing. You have something that needs a 'time test'. Let it run, see what 'fails' first. IT IS IMPORTANT IMO that you should not keep fiddling with it all.

[overunitydotcom]

Have you tried pulsing the input current like chopping it multiple times like in your old radiant energy circuit ? Could this help ?

[overunitydotcom]

Hi Ossie,

what will happen, if you make the Ontime still shorter ? Will the negative current spike then also have less area ?

[m1a9r9s9]

Yes, it is all a balance between the input pulse's on time and voltage and the generator voltage or CEMF and the battery voltage. This is why using low forward voltage diodes is very important at low input battery votages.

[overunitydotcom]

So a higher battery voltage will help to cover the Diode losses ?

Did you try to run it on a 9 Volts block battery or a big cap already ?

[m1a9r9s9]

Higher voltages cause may cause other problems depending on your rotor. For your given running RPM you need your generator/CEMF voltage to be virtually equal your battery voltage. Raising the input battery voltage means you need to increase the rotor RPM so air and bearing friction works against you...

[m1a9r9s9]

See my previous replies below. You need to make the input pulse as large as possible but still hidden or equal to the top of the generator/CEMF pulse in both amplitude AND pulse width!

[overunitydotcom]

So, if the first scopeshot means the input current, then is the area under the negative spike bigger than the area under the positive spike ?

In some cases it looks like it is.

It seems a short ontime will help to get a maximum area negative spike ( energy back to the battery) versus a small area onspike ( energy used by the coils)

Well done.

Regards, Stefan.

[overunitydotcom]

Is the second scopeshot sequence in the video the coil voltage ?

[m1a9r9s9]

Yes, across all of the coil. What is important here is that it shows you that when correctly tuned, the input pulse is hidden inside the generator/CEMF pulse. This is very important in regard to tuning which makes this motor a self runner on a battery which never discharges...

[overunitydotcom]

Hmm, in earlier videos you could see here the input pulse, why here not ?

I guess you mix up inductive kickback BackEMF

with CEMF... ?

[overunitydotcom]

Hi Ossie,

is the first scopeshot shown the input current into the motor ? It would really help, if you would explain this in your videos, what we see here.

Not speaking means guessing in this case ! ;)

Good luck.

Regards, Stefan.

[Axle0001]

Very nice work. GREAT STUFF!

I set-up a basic pulse motor, and posted my video here on YouTube, that ran continually for about 54 hours from a 1.2 volt rechargeable battery. Just a friendly challenge, can your motor run continually / 'indefinitely' for more than 54 hours?

[overunitydotcom]

Well Done Ossie !

Looking forward to the demo today from Steorn.

Regards, Stefan.