Is there a lesson appling this teaching to when a whip snaps/cracks? I liken that situation to that of a person's spine going back to meet the top half of a seat back, not normally used in driving in this circumstance, it being rocked back to accomodate height, and the head snapping back and down finally to meet the head rest in a rear end collision. I am the person. I am trying to show that the ins. company engineer has neglected happenings inside the car when he calculated car impact force.
oh my god, I finally get this. It finally makes sense.
the teachers never explain stuff like this, and if they do, they spend 10 seconds on it, as if they remind it to someone that already know it. -_- d'oh
Hi there :) The word "velocity" means someone is moving at the same speed all the time. For an instance, if you have a velocity of 1 m per seccond, you are moving 1 meter every seccond, the next seccond you will have moved 1 meter more, and in the seccond after that one more. You will not hurry up or slow down, but always walk at the same speed.
@aachikha123 If you accelerate though, it simply means that suddenly you changed your velocity. So if you accelerate you suddenly start moving faster or moving slower then you did before. You are only accelerating in that one moment when your velocity changes. So you could go from walking 1 meter per seccond, to suddenly walking 2 metres per seccond, in the one moment when you change the velocity you are accelerating.
Excellent videos. I'm a student in college and this is saving my life. You are extremely good at explaining these concepts and I am very grateful. The Khan Academy is saving my college education lol
SalFirst: GREAT WORK! (concerning physics:Centripetal Acceleration--Part 2) It is INCORRECT that a sub c is inversly prop. to r. You need to look at (w^2)r for this--not (v^2)/r...and keep in mind that v if a fun. of r.
Sal, as bomberfun1 noted, in your orbiting rocket example, the acceleration is 30ft/sec (instead of ft/sec^2). I would put a balloon comment on this error because your previous video did a great job of distinguishing xy velocity vectors and xy acceleration vectors and students might get re-confused on that distinction, if you don't.
You have to know how to use inches to meters and back in order to rock any exam. The reason why I said it is because @ 08:10 the author uses acceleration (30 ft/sec) but seconds aren't squared, whereas they should be!
Food for thought for those who did not notice that.
I just looked it up and found out USA is the only country that hasn't adopted the metric system. Jesus christ they should just make the conversion and get it over with.
its annoying that they call the imperial system, the english system, since england has adopted the metric system ( far superior since water is the best!)
@BogMonkey53 Actually a few countries in Africa use the same measurement system as the US too.. Haha but yeah I agree that all should change to the metric system.
This is really awsome but my math is tarrible! Ok, my brain synopsis cant prosess math or spelling as easy as other people, I got a learning dissibility, it dose not mean I cant understand it just takes longer for me to understand.
Yeah. The units for acceleration would be ft/s^2. But still...amazing videos. They have been helping me understand my physics classes much better. Khan is an amazing person.
sorry i accidentally Thumped down your comment. anyway, you are correcct acceleration should be ft/s*s. I think he forgot to put the square there. nevertheless the video was very understanable.
@khanacademy it has to be 30ft per sec per sec sir, no offense, I'm your die hard fan
raghavmc 1 month ago
Does this take into account centripetal force?
miniradman 2 months ago
It's nice to have that intuition.
TooManyPBJs 2 months ago
Shoudn't the unit of acceleration be feet multiplied by second inverse two, rather than feet per second?
pritamlaskar 3 months ago
i have a hw question where they gave me the
constat speed? is that the velocity
3888799 4 months ago
@3888799 nope
smkdlian 3 months ago
@3888799 thats the magnitude of the velocity.
sarah29172 2 months ago
i have a hw question where they gave me the c
onstat speed? is that the velocity
3888799 4 months ago
Good Job, I like this. please reach me on Facebook, I love what you are doing here. Great job.
joneparker 8 months ago
Good Job, I like this. please reach me on Facebook, I love what you are doing here. Great job.
joneparker 8 months ago
Is there a lesson appling this teaching to when a whip snaps/cracks? I liken that situation to that of a person's spine going back to meet the top half of a seat back, not normally used in driving in this circumstance, it being rocked back to accomodate height, and the head snapping back and down finally to meet the head rest in a rear end collision. I am the person. I am trying to show that the ins. company engineer has neglected happenings inside the car when he calculated car impact force.
rohman2 9 months ago
oh my god, I finally get this. It finally makes sense.
the teachers never explain stuff like this, and if they do, they spend 10 seconds on it, as if they remind it to someone that already know it. -_- d'oh
narcomanel 9 months ago
Is the acceleration is uniform in uniform circular motion ? plz sir ans me
ZahidAnwar5555 9 months ago
Sir why we take V2 .....plz give me ans in written form I must need it.....our physics sir can not explain it ...
ZahidAnwar5555 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I've got more intuition now
Ann0y1ngFaN 9 months ago
Í've got more intuition now
Ann0y1ngFaN 9 months ago 4
Why are we always in deep space, and not a nice place like Bahamas :/
Ihatenicknames1 10 months ago
Thank you so much. You are a physics angel! :)
LucyGoozie 10 months ago
i keep getting mixed up between acceleration velocityand speed=[ can anyone explain please
aachikha123 10 months ago
@aachikha123
Hi there :) The word "velocity" means someone is moving at the same speed all the time. For an instance, if you have a velocity of 1 m per seccond, you are moving 1 meter every seccond, the next seccond you will have moved 1 meter more, and in the seccond after that one more. You will not hurry up or slow down, but always walk at the same speed.
Ihatenicknames1 10 months ago
@aachikha123 If you accelerate though, it simply means that suddenly you changed your velocity. So if you accelerate you suddenly start moving faster or moving slower then you did before. You are only accelerating in that one moment when your velocity changes. So you could go from walking 1 meter per seccond, to suddenly walking 2 metres per seccond, in the one moment when you change the velocity you are accelerating.
Ihatenicknames1 10 months ago
@aachikha123 I know this can all be very confusing x) I struggled with it myself, just keep thinking about it!
Ihatenicknames1 10 months ago
Nice try, JOHN MAYER.
MitchBodmer 10 months ago
Excellent videos. I'm a student in college and this is saving my life. You are extremely good at explaining these concepts and I am very grateful. The Khan Academy is saving my college education lol
ericmohr6 11 months ago
how do you know when to use either v or a for the speed?
WOWFPS 1 year ago
@WOWFPS
v is actually speed (velocity, m/s), a stands for acceleration (m/s²)
edmundstoiberderdepp 1 year ago
So cartoons are actually pretty accurate! When you run very very very very very fast... you actually start flying! XD
Xclann 1 year ago
For F***S sake... nice video but seriously start using SI units ie. meters not feet...
please
neo92vip 1 year ago
2 people have been hit by someone swinging a rock around
seriously thought these vids are awesome :D
ichbinhornig10 1 year ago
thx!!! great vide0..
90vya 1 year ago
a great little study tool, good work mate
Coombesy2185 1 year ago
SalFirst: GREAT WORK! (concerning physics:Centripetal Acceleration--Part 2) It is INCORRECT that a sub c is inversly prop. to r. You need to look at (w^2)r for this--not (v^2)/r...and keep in mind that v if a fun. of r.
Thanks,
--dale
100nassar 1 year ago
Sal, as bomberfun1 noted, in your orbiting rocket example, the acceleration is 30ft/sec (instead of ft/sec^2). I would put a balloon comment on this error because your previous video did a great job of distinguishing xy velocity vectors and xy acceleration vectors and students might get re-confused on that distinction, if you don't.
jonnygrossman 1 year ago
where can i find the video about gravity which he talks about ?
adamsx01x 2 years ago
Comment removed
bomberfun1 2 years ago
The SI unit for acceleration is m/s^2 though. Why would you use inches?
BogMonkey53 2 years ago
@ BogMonkey53:
You have to know how to use inches to meters and back in order to rock any exam. The reason why I said it is because @ 08:10 the author uses acceleration (30 ft/sec) but seconds aren't squared, whereas they should be!
Food for thought for those who did not notice that.
bomberfun1 2 years ago
In Ireland the road signs are in miles and the butchers sell meat by the pound but things are measured in cm rather than inches.
BogMonkey53 2 years ago
@BogMonkey53 becoz stupid americans are still using imperial measuremenrs!
adamsx01x 2 years ago 4
I just looked it up and found out USA is the only country that hasn't adopted the metric system. Jesus christ they should just make the conversion and get it over with.
BogMonkey53 2 years ago 6
@BogMonkey53
its annoying that they call the imperial system, the english system, since england has adopted the metric system ( far superior since water is the best!)
UberCuba 1 year ago
@BogMonkey53 Actually a few countries in Africa use the same measurement system as the US too.. Haha but yeah I agree that all should change to the metric system.
EvilFatCat 1 year ago
dude...........YOUR AWESOME!!!
You really know how to make things very CLEAR!!!
I'm loving physics even more now!
<3
BButterz88 2 years ago 5
this heeelps!
sal's the man!!
MichaelisOnYourtube 2 years ago 2
To the comment below me are you being serious or funny? -.-
WannaBeiDev 2 years ago
This is really awsome but my math is tarrible! Ok, my brain synopsis cant prosess math or spelling as easy as other people, I got a learning dissibility, it dose not mean I cant understand it just takes longer for me to understand.
pbrskater26 2 years ago
To pbrskater26
Me too, I would say i have a learning dissibility but it takes me long time to understand a simple calculation/ or i
have 2 practice a few time to get the idea
killa34334 2 years ago
thanks sal your great your videos are better than any teacher explaination i reckon you should have be a physics teacher
woo216 2 years ago
intuition
stevogriff12 2 years ago 4
this is very clear. nice job. I'm getting smarter after every video.
polos505 2 years ago 47
I concur! :)
woodenjaw 2 years ago
wow these video's are amazing
letsgobuffalo9 2 years ago 5
Nice video, very helpful, but you said acceleration was in ft/s, shouldn't it be in ft/s^2?
healthyforyou 2 years ago 41
Yeah. The units for acceleration would be ft/s^2. But still...amazing videos. They have been helping me understand my physics classes much better. Khan is an amazing person.
xsajienx 2 years ago 2
sorry i accidentally Thumped down your comment. anyway, you are correcct acceleration should be ft/s*s. I think he forgot to put the square there. nevertheless the video was very understanable.
polos505 2 years ago
@healthyforyou he's made this mistake in a few videos. give him a break though, he's a good teacher
blinkbdj 1 year ago
@blinkbdj I know. But I'm sure many people were wondering about this. So I commented so that they would know that there's an error, that's all.
healthyforyou 1 year ago
@healthyforyou He is not working in standard units either, velocity should be in ms^-1 and the radius in metres etc.. (ms^-1)^2 / m = ms^-2 m^-1 ..?
Sorry if I am wrong anywhere :) ..?
mumbowumbo 1 year ago
thank you so much. I fell more confident to take my test now!
bloodjunkiepr18 3 years ago
yeh he makes awesome vid not confusin at all
volintine 3 years ago
awesome^^
dalaiwtf 3 years ago
Very good explanations. Not confusing at all.
Keep your faith and keep educating. You might not get a million views but your really helping a lot of people that care.
zguitarmaster 3 years ago 5
hmmm I thought you gave us velocity as 30 ft/sec?
anava84 3 years ago 5
It made complete sense, 5 stars
ReaverKS 3 years ago 2
thanks
dandanish 3 years ago 3