It's the OTHER way around, BANKS needed to SUBJUGATE "Productive CAPITAL", they could NOT do so with MONEY, so they did so with LEGAL TENDER status of "NOTES" and CREDITS.
People didn't want what the banks had: CREDIT. They wanted real PRODUCTS. So the bankers wrote the Federal Reserve Act (with a BOARD OF DIRECTORS, like every other corporation) to give BANKNOTES and CREDIT a "LEGAL TENDER" status
LABOR creates PRODUCTS they expect other people to VALUE.
The Federal Reserve cartel are not "Capitalists" they are CREDITORS (not "money lenders" either, since there is no money, only LEGAL TENDER and CREDIT.)
What's MORE the Federal Reserve Cartel is ANTI-COMPETITION.
I wouldn't say that the Federal Reserve is anti-competition, at least not without showing why. I would say they are to an extent because, 1) it has no competition, which leads to 2) it operates like a monopoly. But, I will say they will competitively operate under certain circumstances, given that the federal reserve is a privately-run bank. So it has to thrive off of some competitive means, at least originally.
The original banks that would become the Federal Reserve District Banks, were private and competitive. However, they abandoned competition in favor of a cooperative cartel, and given special monopoly powers by the government. It exists to be a monopolistic cartel, with government license to commit fraud. Having agreeable cooperation is not bad, however, their activity is not limited to "maintaining the money supply" but also in the distribution of money, and the direction of other industries
A monetary system basically pits us against each other as workers competing with each other for jobs just to meet our primary needs.
Profit is the bottom line for big business...so the end result of profit where big business goes to Africa for cheap labor/resources and exploits those countries, thus third world status and citizenry of poverty. Billions are starving for their inability to pay..
Capitalism is a FAILURE. All monetary systems are outdated. There are solutions.
You should make a video about how money capitalist and productive capitalist collude. It's not a conspiracy (spare us of that media garbage)but a fact and end result of ANY monetary system. This colluding is inevitable, for greed and opportunity to collude is there.
That would make for a very interesting subject matter...in detail......for the middle class and poverty stricken to watch.
yes they are. But they also raise good concerns sometimes. Obviously neoliberal ideology cannot answer their questions... questions like: why does the neoliberal ideology of freedom result in more coercive states? What is the role of banking, money and credit in market exchange? Is Hillary Clinton really a shape-shifting lizardman?
Not enough people are creating adequate answers to these questions, at least not in accessible formats. That is why I began this project.
The major problem are the FEDS mandates, the so called, "price-stabilization" mandate, and the "full-employment" mandate. Inflating the money supply translates into inflation, even if there is no absolute increase in the cpi. Some products are more prone to inflationary effects than others, this is not counter-balanced by a corresponding increase in the market rate of interest. This disproportionality creates malinvestments, a misallocation of resources, and eventually a collapse.
1:Hume on trade cycles:Assume the gold reserve of nation X was at 1000 ounces, but they expanded credit to 2500, this is an increase of the M2 by 1,500, which is permissible as long as there is no run on the banks. This in turn leads to a general and relative increase in the price level of Xs goods as well as an increase in the overall wage levels. But this makes Xs goods more expensive on the foreign markets, while making foreign products cheaper; leading to a major trade deficit. This trade
2:deficit leads to a major outflow of gold reserves to foreign countries, further reducing the domestic gold reserves. The banks continue to extend credit upon this dwindling gold reserve, further lowering their liquidity, and perpetuating the boom. Once the banks are worried about a run and their position, they must stop, leading to a complete collapse and reversal of the boom. This causes spiraling deflation, and corrects country Xs balance of payments, as their products become more cheap.
it's also credit money. fiat describes a political relation but not really an economic relation- credit money can have a relation to real value or it can't depending on the ability of the economy to produce real value through goods in services in proportion to the amount of credit money created.
Yes, fiat currency is money which is absent of all intrinsic value.The problem with fiat currencies is that there is nothing preventing the government, and central banks from inflating the money supply. You're video is entertaining and all, but you don't deal with economic monetary theory, or business cycle theory. The FED acts as the lender of last resort, allowing banks to engage in credit expansion, pushing the market rate of interest below the natural rate, disconnecting prices-interest rate
because there is so much hype about that on the internet I decided there was no use making another video about that. There are hundreds of people on youtube all pissed about fractional reserve banking and they all watch each others' videos and then make their own citing each other, in this self-referencing libertarian feedback loop. I figured there was no point in adding to that. Instead I wanted to provide a wider context for the role of banking in a capitalist society.
Fractional reserve banking is the principal modern usury - not interest. The delegation of the money creation power from governments to private banks is carefully hidden, deliberately complicated and esoteric, and generates far more wealth concentration than even interest itself does.
Some good points but overall I feel this vid muddles the issue. Also, there is no reason to associate criticism of the Fed with aliens, etc. and no reason to flash up Ron Paul with conspiracy theorists. IMO you fail to stress the main point - banks create money out of thin air. As long as they can do this and we can't, the bankers will ultimately parasitize and rule us. There is nothing wrong with lending money, just a problem with allowing private individuals to create their own fiat currency.
The point of the video and others about money, whether or not I succeed in making this clear, is that credit creation is an essential part of capitalist society and that the contradictions in the money form which a central bank is supposed to resolve are a result of much deeper contradictions fundamental contradictions in the measurement and exchange of value in a capitalist society. The creation of money out of thin air is a part of a much larger context some of which I provide here.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Saying it does not legitimize the FED does not make it true. My description of the FED is correct yours is mumbo jumbo designed by the FED to cloud the issue. The FED bankers invented the "science" of economics and bribed ALL of the college's to teach it. They also started several schools when in the begining no school wanted to teach their bullshit.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
All the stupid crap about the lizard men,the NWO, and other stupid shit is designed to marginalize anyone who figures out what is really going on. The fact that you include it and not the loans the FED banks loan the corps they own tells me you not intellectually honest. Economists are some of the ugliest greediest people. The ones who are not are just dumb for falling for the scheme. Shame on you for trying to legitmize these scum.
A bunh of scum bankers who loan fiat money to the corporations they own so the corporations can buy commodities before the inflation caused by the fiat money takes effect. They then wait for the inevitable inflation before selling the commodities. By doing this they have diminished our savings. The whole purpose of economics is to seperate wealth from the worker and give it lazy scummy greedy bankers. Your explanation just muddies this truth.
Since most people are actually in debt wouldn't it be beneficial for inflation to occur for a large number of people? At least assuming they get wage increases. And if your general theory is correct wouldn't we see near constant inflation instead of the bursts of inflation that we are seeing now following many years of stable currency?
Look at any long term inflation graph. If that is not near constant I don't know is
Bill Clinton ran surpluses and did not allow the FED to create as much money. On any inflation graph you can clearly see inflation go down a little in Clintons 2nd term. Of course it skyrockets back up after Bush.
Also it is now happening exponentially. They will need to double the money supply in shorter and shorter timespans from now on.
I think its now a toss up between defaulting or inflating the $
Question: If in a socialist society labor time electronic labor credits (vouchers) were used instead of money, would not the labor units measure the socially necessary labor time of production? I understand labor would get their full value and exchange them for commodities at the store and the credits cease to exist after transaction. Of course a sale tax on labor time would pay for health care, education and other social services. Why is this considered Utopian?
Brilliant Brendon ANOTHER facinating and well presented vid. I like the cartoon imagery as well. You are teaching very complexed and importants subjects in political economy in a interestigg format and somehow you have a gift of lecture that keeps the mind engaged, a rare talent for many academics like you.
Please keep up the good work. going to the rest of your vids now.
Best wishes to you . glad to see your are looking well.
btw. the RSS feed on your blog doesn't work. It just shows "welcome to capitalism" and it doesn't update for your new articles. Can that be fixed? I'm used to follow blogs with RSS feeds and I'm probably not the only one, so that would be a nice addition to your website.
thanks for the alert. I must confess i don't even know what an RSS feed is. I will put this on my list of things to "get hip to" this week. In general, my blog probably needs some editing... hmmm... I'll look into it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Wait a second. You just replied and say you did not refer the FED as being an agency. BS at :30 you refer it is as an "agency". Implication of a federal agency. What is the bullshit about reptilian illuminati? You are spreading propaganda SIR!
All hail the mighty prophet!!!
diomedes39 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
spread the w0rd!
through time the country has been taken over under a cloud of lies and deception
a time will come for THE mass civil dis0bedience
and it starts with the
2011 inc0me-tax pr0test
DONT FILE
2011 inc0me-tax pr0test
DONT FILE
spread the w0rd!!
t0gether we can send THE message
serrtucheserrtuche 1 year ago
1)There are no "MONEY CAPITALISTS"
It's the OTHER way around, BANKS needed to SUBJUGATE "Productive CAPITAL", they could NOT do so with MONEY, so they did so with LEGAL TENDER status of "NOTES" and CREDITS.
People didn't want what the banks had: CREDIT. They wanted real PRODUCTS. So the bankers wrote the Federal Reserve Act (with a BOARD OF DIRECTORS, like every other corporation) to give BANKNOTES and CREDIT a "LEGAL TENDER" status
LABOR creates PRODUCTS they expect other people to VALUE.
tuberesponder 1 year ago
BAH, you don't even have the conspiracy correct.
The Federal Reserve cartel are not "Capitalists" they are CREDITORS (not "money lenders" either, since there is no money, only LEGAL TENDER and CREDIT.)
What's MORE the Federal Reserve Cartel is ANTI-COMPETITION.
tuberesponder 1 year ago
I wouldn't say that the Federal Reserve is anti-competition, at least not without showing why. I would say they are to an extent because, 1) it has no competition, which leads to 2) it operates like a monopoly. But, I will say they will competitively operate under certain circumstances, given that the federal reserve is a privately-run bank. So it has to thrive off of some competitive means, at least originally.
RedAntLiberationArmy 1 year ago
The original banks that would become the Federal Reserve District Banks, were private and competitive. However, they abandoned competition in favor of a cooperative cartel, and given special monopoly powers by the government. It exists to be a monopolistic cartel, with government license to commit fraud. Having agreeable cooperation is not bad, however, their activity is not limited to "maintaining the money supply" but also in the distribution of money, and the direction of other industries
tuberesponder 1 year ago
Karl Marx was in the pay of the Rothschilds!!!1 He is freemason/reptilian/tare!!!!!
Lol, cant get enough of these Alex Jones, GEERUP nutjobs
Ilikenuman 2 years ago
A monetary system basically pits us against each other as workers competing with each other for jobs just to meet our primary needs.
Profit is the bottom line for big business...so the end result of profit where big business goes to Africa for cheap labor/resources and exploits those countries, thus third world status and citizenry of poverty. Billions are starving for their inability to pay..
Capitalism is a FAILURE. All monetary systems are outdated. There are solutions.
blaziermissy 2 years ago
Great video.
blaziermissy 2 years ago
You should make a video about how money capitalist and productive capitalist collude. It's not a conspiracy (spare us of that media garbage)but a fact and end result of ANY monetary system. This colluding is inevitable, for greed and opportunity to collude is there.
That would make for a very interesting subject matter...in detail......for the middle class and poverty stricken to watch.
blaziermissy 2 years ago
Simple thought, due to the federal reserve system the wealth of the lower class is melted away. They have no ability to retain savings.
yoransom42 2 years ago
I would actually be scared to post this video. The whole conspiracy people are really getting out of control on YouTube.
TheLeftLibertarian 2 years ago 2
yes they are. But they also raise good concerns sometimes. Obviously neoliberal ideology cannot answer their questions... questions like: why does the neoliberal ideology of freedom result in more coercive states? What is the role of banking, money and credit in market exchange? Is Hillary Clinton really a shape-shifting lizardman?
Not enough people are creating adequate answers to these questions, at least not in accessible formats. That is why I began this project.
brendanmcooney 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
The major problem are the FEDS mandates, the so called, "price-stabilization" mandate, and the "full-employment" mandate. Inflating the money supply translates into inflation, even if there is no absolute increase in the cpi. Some products are more prone to inflationary effects than others, this is not counter-balanced by a corresponding increase in the market rate of interest. This disproportionality creates malinvestments, a misallocation of resources, and eventually a collapse.
Questfortruth86 2 years ago
Comment removed
Questfortruth86 2 years ago
1:Hume on trade cycles:Assume the gold reserve of nation X was at 1000 ounces, but they expanded credit to 2500, this is an increase of the M2 by 1,500, which is permissible as long as there is no run on the banks. This in turn leads to a general and relative increase in the price level of Xs goods as well as an increase in the overall wage levels. But this makes Xs goods more expensive on the foreign markets, while making foreign products cheaper; leading to a major trade deficit. This trade
Questfortruth86 2 years ago
2:deficit leads to a major outflow of gold reserves to foreign countries, further reducing the domestic gold reserves. The banks continue to extend credit upon this dwindling gold reserve, further lowering their liquidity, and perpetuating the boom. Once the banks are worried about a run and their position, they must stop, leading to a complete collapse and reversal of the boom. This causes spiraling deflation, and corrects country Xs balance of payments, as their products become more cheap.
Questfortruth86 2 years ago
I see, privatize profits of banks, and socialize the losses of banks. Thats a great deal for taxpayers.
fattymc20 2 years ago
but when the money is not tied to anything it's all fiat.
hawksstock 2 years ago
it's also credit money. fiat describes a political relation but not really an economic relation- credit money can have a relation to real value or it can't depending on the ability of the economy to produce real value through goods in services in proportion to the amount of credit money created.
brendanmcooney 2 years ago
Yes, fiat currency is money which is absent of all intrinsic value.The problem with fiat currencies is that there is nothing preventing the government, and central banks from inflating the money supply. You're video is entertaining and all, but you don't deal with economic monetary theory, or business cycle theory. The FED acts as the lender of last resort, allowing banks to engage in credit expansion, pushing the market rate of interest below the natural rate, disconnecting prices-interest rate
Questfortruth86 2 years ago
@brendanmcooney Isn't gold technically a fiat currency as well?
juliaisafilmbuff123 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
guess what...the first chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is Pierre Jay... memeber the secret society skull and bones!!!!!
basiclifej 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
guess what...the first chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is Pierre Jay... memeber the secret society skull and bones!!!!!
basiclifej 3 years ago
waht about the fact that under the current legislation banks are allowed to lend time 9 (sometimes more) times as much money as you lodge with them
RevolutionaryJam 3 years ago
because there is so much hype about that on the internet I decided there was no use making another video about that. There are hundreds of people on youtube all pissed about fractional reserve banking and they all watch each others' videos and then make their own citing each other, in this self-referencing libertarian feedback loop. I figured there was no point in adding to that. Instead I wanted to provide a wider context for the role of banking in a capitalist society.
brendanmcooney 3 years ago
fair enough
RevolutionaryJam 3 years ago
Fractional reserve banking is the principal modern usury - not interest. The delegation of the money creation power from governments to private banks is carefully hidden, deliberately complicated and esoteric, and generates far more wealth concentration than even interest itself does.
jbryant13 3 years ago
why don't we stop using money??...I'll do it every monday...the illuminati will die
steblizz 3 years ago
Some good points but overall I feel this vid muddles the issue. Also, there is no reason to associate criticism of the Fed with aliens, etc. and no reason to flash up Ron Paul with conspiracy theorists. IMO you fail to stress the main point - banks create money out of thin air. As long as they can do this and we can't, the bankers will ultimately parasitize and rule us. There is nothing wrong with lending money, just a problem with allowing private individuals to create their own fiat currency.
lorax2013 3 years ago
The point of the video and others about money, whether or not I succeed in making this clear, is that credit creation is an essential part of capitalist society and that the contradictions in the money form which a central bank is supposed to resolve are a result of much deeper contradictions fundamental contradictions in the measurement and exchange of value in a capitalist society. The creation of money out of thin air is a part of a much larger context some of which I provide here.
brendanmcooney 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Saying it does not legitimize the FED does not make it true. My description of the FED is correct yours is mumbo jumbo designed by the FED to cloud the issue. The FED bankers invented the "science" of economics and bribed ALL of the college's to teach it. They also started several schools when in the begining no school wanted to teach their bullshit.
Your videos suck
itstakentoo 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
All the stupid crap about the lizard men,the NWO, and other stupid shit is designed to marginalize anyone who figures out what is really going on. The fact that you include it and not the loans the FED banks loan the corps they own tells me you not intellectually honest. Economists are some of the ugliest greediest people. The ones who are not are just dumb for falling for the scheme. Shame on you for trying to legitmize these scum.
itstakentoo 3 years ago
this video is not meant to "legitimize" the FED. I am merely attempting to broaden the critique to include a broader critique of capitalism.
brendanmcooney 3 years ago
Here is a much better description of the FED
A bunh of scum bankers who loan fiat money to the corporations they own so the corporations can buy commodities before the inflation caused by the fiat money takes effect. They then wait for the inevitable inflation before selling the commodities. By doing this they have diminished our savings. The whole purpose of economics is to seperate wealth from the worker and give it lazy scummy greedy bankers. Your explanation just muddies this truth.
itstakentoo 3 years ago
Since most people are actually in debt wouldn't it be beneficial for inflation to occur for a large number of people? At least assuming they get wage increases. And if your general theory is correct wouldn't we see near constant inflation instead of the bursts of inflation that we are seeing now following many years of stable currency?
comradepinko 3 years ago
Look at any long term inflation graph. If that is not near constant I don't know is
Bill Clinton ran surpluses and did not allow the FED to create as much money. On any inflation graph you can clearly see inflation go down a little in Clintons 2nd term. Of course it skyrockets back up after Bush.
Also it is now happening exponentially. They will need to double the money supply in shorter and shorter timespans from now on.
I think its now a toss up between defaulting or inflating the $
itstakentoo 3 years ago 2
Defaulting is not an option.
comradepinko 3 years ago
Question: If in a socialist society labor time electronic labor credits (vouchers) were used instead of money, would not the labor units measure the socially necessary labor time of production? I understand labor would get their full value and exchange them for commodities at the store and the credits cease to exist after transaction. Of course a sale tax on labor time would pay for health care, education and other social services. Why is this considered Utopian?
Socialgreenman 3 years ago
im glad you brought this one up
seigneurvoland666 3 years ago
Brilliant Brendon ANOTHER facinating and well presented vid. I like the cartoon imagery as well. You are teaching very complexed and importants subjects in political economy in a interestigg format and somehow you have a gift of lecture that keeps the mind engaged, a rare talent for many academics like you.
Please keep up the good work. going to the rest of your vids now.
Best wishes to you . glad to see your are looking well.
nbm34 3 years ago
Amazing videos!
btw. the RSS feed on your blog doesn't work. It just shows "welcome to capitalism" and it doesn't update for your new articles. Can that be fixed? I'm used to follow blogs with RSS feeds and I'm probably not the only one, so that would be a nice addition to your website.
MariborchanX 3 years ago 2
thanks for the alert. I must confess i don't even know what an RSS feed is. I will put this on my list of things to "get hip to" this week. In general, my blog probably needs some editing... hmmm... I'll look into it.
brendanmcooney 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wait a second. You just replied and say you did not refer the FED as being an agency. BS at :30 you refer it is as an "agency". Implication of a federal agency. What is the bullshit about reptilian illuminati? You are spreading propaganda SIR!
911truthnc 3 years ago
go look up the word "agency". You are digging yourself a hole. Please don't ask me to help dig you out.
brendanmcooney 3 years ago
Indeed money is debt or debt is "monetized".
You say it with a simplicity that the common person can understand. KUDOS.
divinejudge1 3 years ago
Well, I don't think money is only debt.... but well... check out my video "what the hell is money". That's says some of it.
brendanmcooney 3 years ago
I love this presentation! *****
TheBigHo111 3 years ago 2