Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (103)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • He is very right source plays like crap....this is why the pros only played it for a short time then came back to 1.6...... Even if they make a new Cs or make 1.6 look "prettier" people will still love 1.6....that's all I have to say bout that

  • Moto is a faggot. He's the one riding around in a junker.

  • they should just update the cs 1.6 to look better

  • source isnt shit but i cant play it too long. im addicted to 1.6

  • i played 1.6 when it was first released for years, played cz when it was 1st released for several years and played css for years. There are alot of faults & glitches on 1.6, the graphics arent so good either, if there wernt so many faults it would be much better, however, 1.6 is harder and more competitive compared to css, as cz is out of the question My opinion Css is better, yet i still like to play 1.6 and css, i think they should upgrade faults of 1.6 and the graphics it would be ALOT better

  • @vialymate No need to enhance the graphics and what 'faults' are you talking about? 1.6 isn't "harder" either lol I don't know where you come up with these random assertions.

  • Just a crybaby because he's bad at source.

  • @shamz0rz bad at source? everyone is bad at source cus source is bad.

  • this nigger stole the video from me

  • having played both for the same amount of time i can say i liked source better for me. the graphics and the psychics and yes theres alot of recoil lol but once u get good u can control it. my brother plays 1.6 and when he plays source im always the top fragger.1.6'ers are so used to the game i understand because its been out so long that 1.6 ers and they dont wanna switch cause they dont wanna lose there skills and start over again. but both games are valve just enjoy it

  • the spead and recoil is just to much for the awpstand on a ladder and look down and shoot just wtach where the bullet is in other words i love the game.

  • Totally true. I've played source first and then switched back to 1.6 because all my friends played it, it was hard at first but when I got used to it, it was just like source for me before. They're both great games, there're just too many differences that 'hardcore' 1.6 fans can't bare. For example smaller places for harder awp'ing, the recoil is the best for m4 and the worst for the ak, etc (in source of course). One thing I still hate in source, overpowered flashes.

  • You heard him, i have nothing else to say now...

  • 1.6, rips hard. most players ever on an online game. Iv played it for awhile now and it is a much better game than source. no pointless barrels, no you can only hit people through a 1cm thick wall, or realy easy aiming. no countless whiney kids on every pub.

    but source is cool in that its realy realy fun. if i play it anymore its because im not competing on 1.6 and i just want to rip faces with realy nice graphics

  • you should working on your spelling first.

  • lol, volcano, method, and ksharp are all gonna play esea open s4 east for css.

  • wait what? thats gonna be lawlzy. ima enter the open division for the lulz and play em lol.

  • yep, their team name is orgrimmar ctu.... lol.... s4 east

  • or ctu orgrimmar rather....

  • god damn. that is gonna be funny as fuck to watch.

  • lol.... i like source more..... but wow, all of the source players here really do come up with the stupidest ass reasons as to why they think source is better.... haha

  • if u guys never realised while playing 1.6...aiming is crap...if u aim ur cross at ur enemy...the bullets scater around the whole place...but source has fixed aiming. were u put ur cross at it will shoot at that spot

  • What? By making aiming easier source is better? It's difficult to hit shots in 1.6 in comparison to source. Who cares if a kid knows where the center of their monitor is? I care about how well a player can use the gun.

  • you dont absolute have a clue :DDDDDD

  • its difficult because its glitched retard

  • you make no sense haha. cute, angry kid

  • wtf? cute and angry? o.o

  • ahahaha never laughed that hard

  • you suck

  • source has better physics, better graphics, worse gameplay ( still good ) ..... 1.6 is leet

  • @defragen1 its all preference, everything is usually, if you like 1.6 thats great, if you like source thats great too lol

  • @defragen1 source has worse physics

  • @Se7eN2727 you're fucking delusional

  • @defragen1 you're fucking mad

  • @Se7eN2727 I'm working on a mod using source engine 2010. What have you done? Sit DOWN little BOY

  • @defragen1 i dont really care.

  • @Se7eN2727 thats because you lost the argument. Step aside noob fuck

  • @defragen1 k

  • Myself i think 1.5 is better than 1.6 and Source.

    But Source suck balls.

  • DUDE this guy even admitted he was wrong on the 3d forums..

    I played 1.6 for the longest time and when i tried source, when it came out, i hated it because it ran bad on my computer and i was really bad at it.

    This was recorded at the end of 2006, it was still pretty difficult to run the game.

    Honestly i think everyone that says source is bad is on a bandwagon.

    Its idiotic to say source requires less aiming or skill. Theres not even more lucky shots. I can get a lucky shot in both game

  • @two203 Source has bigger hit boxes. bigger hit boxes mean more chances to hit. Source also has lessen recoil and take away alot of stuff like quick scoping ( just changes the way u do it), crouch hopping, and other things

    Personaly i think they both are great unless you play off esea then its full of cheaters and 10 year old admins who abuse

  • @imissjr8 i haven't seen a side by side comparison, but if the hit boxes are bigger they aren't much bigger. The recoil isn't lower its just a different spread. crouch hopping is a glitch that was taken out. This video is really old and i have no doubt that they believe the game runs bad because they weren't capable of running it at a constant 100 fps. You cant really say one is easier because there are good very good players in both games.making both equally hard. The engines are different.

  • I am a hard core sourcer, and i enjoy playing 1.6 on the side, but the flaws in 1.6 to me don't out way the slight flaw in source hitboxes!

    Getting hit through walls with nades small ass heads in comparison to those broad ass shoulders!

    Both games have flaws as do all games, its just some ppl accept some types while others accept the other type...

  • Incorrect, we stick to 1.6 because we enjoy the competitiveness of the game, and the skill required to play the game. Think before you post, idiot.

    Most 1.6 players have computers good enough to play source. Source is like 5 years old, any computer now a days can play that it.

    Ignorance is bliss.

  • and evidently you prefer source more because you can't aim for shit :p

  • i think both games are good, i would likely play 1.6 if there was more ppl still playing it =/

  • Source r for the noobs. When they get better they start to play 1.6, unless they r retarded

  • december 2006

  • SOURCE IS A PEACE OF SHIT.

  • i dont think there one is better than the other

    even if it's 'the same game' its still a completely different style...

    and btw moto answered this interview after and admit that he didnt even try source before saying that

  • source is a fucking joke

  • Well he speaks for the people who have grown a custom to 1.6! It would be the same for ppl who have played source since it came out. No way I would like 1.6...

    Point proven, shut up fags :)

  • source sux

  • i played cal-intermediate in 1.6 and then i i played cal-i in source. source was so fucking easy it got boring. i went back to 1.6 and i was so used to source that i couldn't even play 1.6 anymore. the only reason the pro teams play source is because there's more money involved.

  • fuck i didn't post that someone else did on my account sry

  • Well said :)

  • 1.6 is a faster game.

  • css rocks. 1.6 rocks. cz is still bad

  • source is a fucking shit

    1.6 ftw !

    :D

  • Yeah basically VALVe has ruined all classic games, i can not speak for TF, but DoD 1.3 and CS 1.6 were both great games, their 2nd versions are completely awful. Fuck DoD Source, fuck CS Source.

  • i think they were trying to make source "realistic" which is why things like crouching is so sluggish i dunno...all i no is that source feelz...awkward

  • fuck its funny seeing peoples comments on how 1.6 is bad because the gfx are bad lol.

    Fucking kids

  • On the 3D forums he even admitted he was naive and stupid to say it and he takes it back 100%

  • lol pubstar ftl

  • Umm your a dumbass and you dont know what your talking about. Shoot the sky headshot what rates are you using. CS1.6 boxed hitbox registry is good and its a great game.

  • HAHA you source noobs cant accept the fact that your game is horrible

    sourceisbad(dot)com

  • I can't believe some idiot, actually put the time together, to defend a terrible game.

  • lol are you fucking dumb? shoot in the sky and get headshot? omfg what the hell are you talking about.Awp on 1.6 doesnt go straight,on source it does!The models are fucking huge and its so easy to get hs! 1.6 is much better,looks worse than source,but the gameplay is so much better!...

    ITs ok that you like source,but get some of your points straight..lols..1.6 takes more skill and its better for competition.

  • Wow dumb much? Thats an opinion, although I have noticed everything you said about 1.6 is actually true for source, except the awp shooting straight. Graphic wise the game is a little behind the times, but think about how old it is... Two different games and comparing them to each other is like comparing the x-box version to the pc, apples and oranges. For all you anti Source fans, I agree 1.6 is my game of choice by far, but to put down source is just ignorant.

  • you shoot in the sky and get headshots on 1.6?

    on source its like you shoot the foot and get a headshot, you dipshit LOL

  • im do so agree with the guy in the video.I have 1.6 and css..Css looks better(of course,its new compared to 1.6),but css runs like crap.The gameplay is terrible.And he isnt saying that because he sucks in css,he is actually pretty good i believe.

    So i think he is right

  • How is the gameplay different? Because I've yet to hear that be explained.

  • play the game and find out

  • LOLCGSYOUDIE?!?

  • LoLuCGS?

  • who the fuck plays source anyway? im guessing flunkys

  • whats sad is that you ask stupid questions. Lets see sk top team in sweeden..coL.....fnatic.....th­e best teams in the world

  • wow 3 teams.. big whoop

  • those are the pros....are you seriously this stupid? there a good 5,000+ pro clans and even more semi pro and amature teams...

  • lol alright you nerd

  • its funny how you call nerd, no im just educated

  • ...? LOL

  • 3 teams eh? MyM?EG?Fnatic?SK?Complexity?x3­o?MnM? so shhj

  • HEY! even though this video wasnt mine to begin with i was the one who ripped it off the other site lol but thats fine i dont care

  • lol ownedddddd

  • lets listen to this guy cuz hes pro!

    rofl

  • of course!

  • Hes completely right.

  • I laughed so hard when he said "Source is an awful game", moto is a funny guy. :)

  • cuz it is

  • FUCK SOURCE

  • you are fucking right man

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more