The jeans should COMPLETELY cover the shoes, so that you can't see 'em. Also, I remember women mainly wearing things like brown coduroy trouser skirts, and s*** like that.
those are not bell bottoms at all ! You lose enormous credibility by not showing real bellbottoms . If you know that they are not bellbottoms you should state so . You are also not wearing platforms at all ! What a fucked up site. misinfomation .
@Trelawny25 ebay has alot of great bell bottoms. I saw some for men that would look "in" today because of the plaid and they looked BRAN NEW. But someone else bought them : (
@sweetkat85 These are mostly 1960s stuff. Wher did this girl get her info? You didn't need plyers just because your jeans fit at the natural waistline instead of the hop huggers I see now with fat bulging all around. We had better bodies than todays' crew of obese teenagers, IMHO
@1caninelover Pretty much, though being fat these days is "in". It's stereotyped in movies/shows that skinny people puke a lot, starve themselves, etc. to stay skinny. Though fat jealous teenagers are actually jealous that "skinny" kid looks good. Her outfit doesn't really go with either of those decades.
Actually the jeans your wearing do not look anything like the jeans in the 1970s . Your wearing small flares . At least you did give us a caveat regarding the waist . Yes the waist was a little higher . The waist on Levis did not form fit to the torso either . Another reason my girlfriend liked them . Bellbottoms were a lot bigger in the bell also !
Jeans didnt get skin tight until "designer jeans" came along . Levis bell bottoms were mens jeans though girls bought them just as much . The waist did not come up as high as you have stated either . Again these were mens jeans . The hot thing back then for girls was to wear your high heels and buy a pair of Levis bell bottoms really long so they came about an eight of an inch off the floor over your heels . This made her legs look really long . I still like this look as I like long legs .
i am going to a surprise party for a friend 40th bday party... Your series of how to dress is very helpful
Thank you for putting it together...
ladychiro1 5 months ago
The jeans should COMPLETELY cover the shoes, so that you can't see 'em. Also, I remember women mainly wearing things like brown coduroy trouser skirts, and s*** like that.
LOL!
agfagaevart 6 months ago
Hey pancake tities those are not bellbottoms!
jamajezzie 9 months ago
Nooooooo!! Not even close.........
littlequeen64 1 year ago
you clearly have NO idea......you are just embarrasing yourself!!!!!
budi57 1 year ago
not flattering jeans for a pear shaped body
dolcevitausa 1 year ago
they had low rise bell bottoms,they were called'hip huggers'worn with a belly baring cropped top or not.
lioness500 1 year ago
those are not bell bottoms at all ! You lose enormous credibility by not showing real bellbottoms . If you know that they are not bellbottoms you should state so . You are also not wearing platforms at all ! What a fucked up site. misinfomation .
maddogtannen1966 1 year ago
Do you think that bell bottoms will come back is they were in the 70s? Not waist hight but just as the big flares?
Mr1991kid 1 year ago
Those look like modern boot cut jeans. I recall the pants in the 70's having huge flares.
AeroWaffles 1 year ago
bellbottoms should cover the feet
flaretreks 2 years ago
my mom was born in the 70's btw it was 1973
shawandazurline 2 years ago
I want some really tight 70's jeans you can't find good tight jeans they all have stretch in them now
Trelawny25 2 years ago
@Trelawny25 ebay has alot of great bell bottoms. I saw some for men that would look "in" today because of the plaid and they looked BRAN NEW. But someone else bought them : (
Mr1991kid 1 year ago
You have really cute feet!
pajax6 2 years ago
those are like small flares, bell bottoms are a totally different shape, they are HUGE
sweetkat85 2 years ago 10
@sweetkat85 These are mostly 1960s stuff. Wher did this girl get her info? You didn't need plyers just because your jeans fit at the natural waistline instead of the hop huggers I see now with fat bulging all around. We had better bodies than todays' crew of obese teenagers, IMHO
1caninelover 1 year ago
@1caninelover Pretty much, though being fat these days is "in". It's stereotyped in movies/shows that skinny people puke a lot, starve themselves, etc. to stay skinny. Though fat jealous teenagers are actually jealous that "skinny" kid looks good. Her outfit doesn't really go with either of those decades.
earjams1 1 year ago
you're a complete idiot regarding everything 1970s
taylorbortnerathing 2 years ago 8
No no no!! Ask your mum who lived the 70s bevore posting videos on this subject!!!
lafatbiche 2 years ago
No, no, no, no!!!
lafatbiche 2 years ago
no.............
littlequeen64 2 years ago
Actually the jeans your wearing do not look anything like the jeans in the 1970s . Your wearing small flares . At least you did give us a caveat regarding the waist . Yes the waist was a little higher . The waist on Levis did not form fit to the torso either . Another reason my girlfriend liked them . Bellbottoms were a lot bigger in the bell also !
maddogtannen1966 2 years ago
Jeans didnt get skin tight until "designer jeans" came along . Levis bell bottoms were mens jeans though girls bought them just as much . The waist did not come up as high as you have stated either . Again these were mens jeans . The hot thing back then for girls was to wear your high heels and buy a pair of Levis bell bottoms really long so they came about an eight of an inch off the floor over your heels . This made her legs look really long . I still like this look as I like long legs .
maddogtannen1966 2 years ago