These are not cutter charges dumb fucks. They're window blinds! If they were charges, the smoke would hang in the air or shoot up as the building goes down. These "squibs" stay in place as the building falls.
You people are stupid dumb fucks of the first order.
It is true, no building has collapsed anything like WTC7 before or since. Unless of course it was a controlled demolition. This just shows the trouble we can get into by thinking. The Department of Homeland Security has recommended that citizens cease thinking. There enough thinkers in the government. If you have any questions, please refer to statements made by our leaders.
Small fires cannot make a building collapse perfectly symmetrical in on itselt. The damage on the south wall would've also made the building topple toward the south..not straight down. Also fires do not create demolition squibs going from bottom to up on the right side of the building.
Yes, if a building collapses the air below it dissapears into oblivion. These 'squibs' are nothing more than air finding an escape route. Besides, if it WAS a controlled demolition, where are the LOUD explosions? Where are the BRIGHT flashes? Those who ignore answers to THEIR OWN quesions are ignorant, stubborn, and refuse to admit their OWN country is being decent and TELLING THE TRUTH! w w w(dot)loosechangeguide(dot)com
witnesses heard & felt explosions. you don't always get bright flashes especially if the explosions are at the core columns.
journalof911studies com ae911truth org for scientific,& sourced articles by real scientist who are not afraid to put their names on their work. Why do the debunkers hide their names & qualifications??
Logically, what other possible explanation is there for these visible squibs? It's certainly not due to the fire, dozens of storys below. It's not machinegun gfire. What is it? Doesn't it warrant any sort of investigation? Many believe it does.
The evidence of demolition is right there, as clear as day, literally. To deny it, or to somehow demand more "proof" demonstrates either your complicity, blindness, or affrontive, perpetual denial of reality. All you have to do is suspect foul play rather than joyously embrace our (or any) government, bungling and proven liars over and over again throughout all of history.
If this isn't enough evidence of a controlled demolition for you, then you're just stubornly denying the truth and and you're not willing to be right if it means going against the government's theories.
all those explosion appear in less than a quarter of a second and at the exact same time there are multiple floors being blown out in the left bottom corner of the vid,absolute proof that the building was helped with explosives!
Building 7 was the third skyscraper to be reduced to rubble on September 11, 2001. According to the government, small fires leveled this building, but fires have never before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper.
The team who investigated the collapse were not allowed access to the crime scene. By the time they published their inconclusive report, the evidence had been destroyed.
the whole world is being taken for a ride, it is SO fucked up. all in the name of greed. evil is defintaly a foot. if karma doesn't exist then these bastards are getting away with it all
squibs are also easily visible during the collapses of WTC1 and WTC2. All three collapses were caught on tape from many different angles, all of which are consistant in showing squibs and other evidence of controlled demolition.
The collapse times are enough to me. All three collapses were at near freefall speed. Only possible with the use of well-placed explosive charges.
Utter suggestive nonesense. The building was already collapsing when these 'squibs' were firing. Anything failing apart is going to snap at the joints and throw out debris. Look again from this perspective http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aL0zYx-FQ3Y&search=wtc7
Where was the building collapsing? At the bottom. The upper 20+ stories of the WTC7 fell as a "unit", with NO relative movement between the floors. Yes, you would expect a puff of dust if the floors were collapsing onto each other and compressing the air, but these floors were moving as a monolithic unit. The squibs are present despite the fact that the floors they are appearing on are NOT moving toward each other. Case closed.
Case not closed...only your mind my friend. Answer this simple question. For 'them' to have rigged that building to be demolished they would have to sure that debris from WTC1/2 was going to fall on it. WTC7 most definately did have debris fall on it - how could this have been predicted beforehand? It would have looked a little silly if it was demolished with no pre-exisiting damage like other buildings round WTC1/2. I'd be very interested to see you explain this?
Are you aware of what our government has done with the "missing" two trillion dollars (Rumsfeld's statement on 9/10/01)? Are you aware of our military capabilities? I suspect that the answer to both of those questions is "No".
No rule says that WTC7 had to be visibly damaged by debris from the collapsing towers before it could be brought down. And the method by which it was destroyed is still unknown. We only posit demolition charges because that is the only method WE THE PEOPLE know about.
For the sake of argument, let's say that NO debris hit WTC7. Would anyone pay MORE attention to those who say that it was brought down with additional explosives? No, supporters of the Official Conspiracy Theory would still insist that it fell due to internal fires.
Anyone watching WTC7 come down intuitively realizes that the building is not collapsing due to damage from fires or impact. Seeing the top-most 20+ floors falling as a single, monolithic unit is believing.
those are window blinds going up as the building goes down.
FunkyGranny9 1 year ago
@FunkyGranny9 LOL!
AIexKidd 8 months ago
Squibs. Apparently solid, retracting squibs. Uh huh.
brazenlilraisin 1 year ago
These are not cutter charges dumb fucks. They're window blinds! If they were charges, the smoke would hang in the air or shoot up as the building goes down. These "squibs" stay in place as the building falls.
You people are stupid dumb fucks of the first order.
Dannavy85 1 year ago
watch?v=_kSq663m0G8
wkwickham 1 year ago
lol - this is the "evidence" ???
now when the bldg collapses, you wouldn't expect a few windows to break would you?
naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
by the way - where's the audio of theose "squibs" or did you leave the audio out because it sounded like broken glass lol
wkwickham 1 year ago
It is true, no building has collapsed anything like WTC7 before or since. Unless of course it was a controlled demolition. This just shows the trouble we can get into by thinking. The Department of Homeland Security has recommended that citizens cease thinking. There enough thinkers in the government. If you have any questions, please refer to statements made by our leaders.
RichardC111165 3 years ago 2
perfect sequence of explosions up the side of the building. Wake up! These bastards should be publicly tried and executed for what they've done.
ahvaimusicom 4 years ago
9/11 = INSIDE JOB!
Small fires cannot make a building collapse perfectly symmetrical in on itselt. The damage on the south wall would've also made the building topple toward the south..not straight down. Also fires do not create demolition squibs going from bottom to up on the right side of the building.
ceresone 4 years ago 2
@ceresone incorrect
watch?v=_kSq663m0G8
2:10-2:40 clearly adresses the fact that there were major fires and that the building had a truss system inside
all it takes is for one truss to weaked, the the whole building would come down
of course there are no squibs - no audio of squibs
firefighters knew the bldg was coming down, thats why they evacuated
they heard the groans and popping sounds inside
the "squibs"? lol you mean broken windows?
wkwickham 1 year ago
@wkwickham
"all it takes is for one truss to weaked, the the whole building would come down"
Hello, please excuse English; you perhaps are joking?
I build skyscraper in NY to collapse if one truss weakened, Building Inspector throw building permit in trash dumpster, lock my dumb ass in jail, no?
Skeptic121 1 year ago 2
timeforchange2007.blogspot
MOTOCYCODUDE 4 years ago
Yes, if a building collapses the air below it dissapears into oblivion. These 'squibs' are nothing more than air finding an escape route. Besides, if it WAS a controlled demolition, where are the LOUD explosions? Where are the BRIGHT flashes? Those who ignore answers to THEIR OWN quesions are ignorant, stubborn, and refuse to admit their OWN country is being decent and TELLING THE TRUTH! w w w(dot)loosechangeguide(dot)com
Alliednations8 4 years ago
L O L air ownign steel and concret?
id rather belive it was magical pixie dust rather than that bullshit
Garbonzo07 4 years ago
witnesses heard & felt explosions. you don't always get bright flashes especially if the explosions are at the core columns.
journalof911studies com ae911truth org for scientific,& sourced articles by real scientist who are not afraid to put their names on their work. Why do the debunkers hide their names & qualifications??
lisabob22 3 years ago 2
Logically, what other possible explanation is there for these visible squibs? It's certainly not due to the fire, dozens of storys below. It's not machinegun gfire. What is it? Doesn't it warrant any sort of investigation? Many believe it does.
33rdPatriot 4 years ago
The evidence of demolition is right there, as clear as day, literally. To deny it, or to somehow demand more "proof" demonstrates either your complicity, blindness, or affrontive, perpetual denial of reality. All you have to do is suspect foul play rather than joyously embrace our (or any) government, bungling and proven liars over and over again throughout all of history.
33rdPatriot 4 years ago
2 seconds of blurry images is supposed to PROVE the government did this? amazing how desperate u idiots get.
Alliednations8 4 years ago
LOL @ "is that the best you can do?"
WTF IS THIS, A GAME SHOW!?!
We are talking about saving the Constitution here!
Constitution Class:
UniversalSeed d0t 0rg
2 films to get under your belt:
ZeitgeistMovie d0t c0m
WKJO d0t c0m
chucksheen 4 years ago
If this isn't enough evidence of a controlled demolition for you, then you're just stubornly denying the truth and and you're not willing to be right if it means going against the government's theories.
MakeJoke 4 years ago
all those explosion appear in less than a quarter of a second and at the exact same time there are multiple floors being blown out in the left bottom corner of the vid,absolute proof that the building was helped with explosives!
F4O4U4R4S 4 years ago
Building 7 was the third skyscraper to be reduced to rubble on September 11, 2001. According to the government, small fires leveled this building, but fires have never before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper.
The team who investigated the collapse were not allowed access to the crime scene. By the time they published their inconclusive report, the evidence had been destroyed.
mkx06 5 years ago
the whole world is being taken for a ride, it is SO fucked up. all in the name of greed. evil is defintaly a foot. if karma doesn't exist then these bastards are getting away with it all
pindle 5 years ago
squibs are also easily visible during the collapses of WTC1 and WTC2. All three collapses were caught on tape from many different angles, all of which are consistant in showing squibs and other evidence of controlled demolition.
The collapse times are enough to me. All three collapses were at near freefall speed. Only possible with the use of well-placed explosive charges.
lfl420 5 years ago
Utter suggestive nonesense. The building was already collapsing when these 'squibs' were firing. Anything failing apart is going to snap at the joints and throw out debris. Look again from this perspective http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aL0zYx-FQ3Y&search=wtc7
iainkerr 5 years ago
i agree controlled demo all the way
krdando 5 years ago
Where was the building collapsing? At the bottom. The upper 20+ stories of the WTC7 fell as a "unit", with NO relative movement between the floors. Yes, you would expect a puff of dust if the floors were collapsing onto each other and compressing the air, but these floors were moving as a monolithic unit. The squibs are present despite the fact that the floors they are appearing on are NOT moving toward each other. Case closed.
Ezlivin 5 years ago
Case not closed...only your mind my friend. Answer this simple question. For 'them' to have rigged that building to be demolished they would have to sure that debris from WTC1/2 was going to fall on it. WTC7 most definately did have debris fall on it - how could this have been predicted beforehand? It would have looked a little silly if it was demolished with no pre-exisiting damage like other buildings round WTC1/2. I'd be very interested to see you explain this?
iainkerr 5 years ago
Are you aware of what our government has done with the "missing" two trillion dollars (Rumsfeld's statement on 9/10/01)? Are you aware of our military capabilities? I suspect that the answer to both of those questions is "No".
No rule says that WTC7 had to be visibly damaged by debris from the collapsing towers before it could be brought down. And the method by which it was destroyed is still unknown. We only posit demolition charges because that is the only method WE THE PEOPLE know about.
Ezlivin 5 years ago
WTC7 damage.
http://judi.kw.nl/uploads/fok/wtc7-sw-corner1.jpg
damn these guys were good knowing WTC7 was going to get damaged.
iainkerr 5 years ago
For the sake of argument, let's say that NO debris hit WTC7. Would anyone pay MORE attention to those who say that it was brought down with additional explosives? No, supporters of the Official Conspiracy Theory would still insist that it fell due to internal fires.
Anyone watching WTC7 come down intuitively realizes that the building is not collapsing due to damage from fires or impact. Seeing the top-most 20+ floors falling as a single, monolithic unit is believing.
Ezlivin 5 years ago
If that is the best you can do you have just proved that you have no case and you should just quit while you're behind
ratmonkey664 5 years ago
my god, how did that cause a total straight down implosion?
this image is not explaining how asymetrical damage caused such perfectly symmetrical collapse
Oh yea, the walls caved in onto themselves, leaving a very neat pile.
From damage to 1 corner?
grozlz 4 years ago
no question about it, bldg 7 was taken down with a controlled demolition.
fissionchips303 5 years ago