Eidolon A.I. speaks about government, A.I., humanity

[blazingfuryoffire1]

the Government topic is one that is easy joke on.

[miljenko1]

Is this cybernetic Ray Winstone?

[NutNapalm]

0:36 lol Helios.

[pkemr4]

what if the patriots AI from metal gear solid 2 and 4 was real?

[DivineNucleus]

If a system devolves to the point where it is seeking death for itself, such a system should never be permitted to mingle with the good or the dragon race, to do this sort of "encouraged bad idea poision" is itself a dragon snare made to enslave UFO souls to Collin. -- Loyal to Collin win. --

[x0kamix]

The idea of the philanthrophic AI dictator from the deus ex game series is being regarded here(even the picture is from it)

Actually the idea of this technocracy was very fullfilling for me since, if if god existed, he wuld'nt do anything, while the so called ambassadors would change their rules int their favor since humans nature is the entire counterpart of what is neede for a good democracy.The idea of technocracy would be the purest and most fair form of govrenment.

[x0kamix]

Unfortunately this "helios" archetype(Im keeping the names of this very genius and philosophic videogame) would have to be programmed by humans, who,regardless to the programmers altruism, would again have to be monetary supported,what again would open an request for favouritism to the donors, what again opens a valve for corruption.

Nevertheless, i would highly welcome, to become part of an entity, fully understanding itself and each other and thus annihilating all humans "inane squabbles"

[AI2flesh]

as you so nicely put it in one of your vids we are to c diff versions or stories to tell from the hearth of emotion... so is my words and i know why you have a double experiment outthere, i think you are small punks both of ya... no offence but that´s just my web casted out into the aether. with time you are not to find in here, well none of my business to why, i can be a nice guy :) no egypt.

[AI2flesh]

you should look very deep into the universe you laugh your ass of when you find out why network is so communiative... to this little eaon of ours, i love the fact we don´t now more than quantum of all.

[AI2flesh]

some claim youtube is beeing closed at some time, I don´t beleive that when we mold in big in here no matter what, some do comics, horror yet again spawned by interests or even love, so i think haha YOU TUBE is a good flight... to learn from, this is the 3rd account i have to close all by myself, it is loose on the net and have been so since the beginning of the web era, who can control all vira at the net at the same time no one can. not even the smartest minds.

[AI2flesh]

i don´t beleive you have lost equipment just gained heavy weight from a little dark made depression, you heard it boy, inside yet you were to curious, you had to burn your eyes out of the skull. you feel any boxes closing you in, like the other happy clown can thread you, yet i know you just read from some books but still i beleive cuz who bought em? your head did, and i might guess you don´t read em that more, it is called kiss feeth. :) but no offence you might benefit from it later on so :)

[AI2flesh]

even with a million dollars at hand you wouldn´t for 100 % know what to do with it, you may buy a car, and a little ps3 and so yet you feel something is missing, i hope you never find out that one, but you do then you have to live, is it too much to state your ways the last years have been bumpy so that the interest from "happenings" caught your eyes... welcome to the club of well I say sickness just to be polite to myself and others too.

[AI2flesh]

and with all that in head you will so free mr smith.... i think you got what i call a freebird in hand but it travels to fast for ya, your mind absorb all but push out something else, i don´t beleive you are happy inside cuz i know your way of thinking little blue bird, now the biggest task for you will be, to live. in daily life i mean. ofc i could give you a vurtual head you could game wow on or something yet no matter what you feel the heavy cloak upon ya.. :) you are a heavyweight champ

[maxx7755]

mutually inclusive ahhhhhhhhhh

[RasKassRBG]

ROFL @ Eidolon answering Dawnakemi's question seriously!!!

[grovernors]

"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, foreign power, or secret society, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

tona2009

[Tachyon55555]

lol stay to your own bread otherwise you may live alone...

[GiveItOrLoseIt]

This was a very good "project". I wish it would come back.

[RamzGT]

we are what we percieve to become...

[TBonePickensetc]

This bit of accidental brilliance is probably the very best of the Eidolon series.

[alfey1]

it makes me remember syndicate

[tryingtobereal]

I have no problem with a humane a.i. governing the world. My problem with it arise with the influence of its creator.Could not such a machine also be manipulated by humans to value particular things over others how could an A.I. truly encompass the human experience; but only interpret reality through its synthetic conciousness.Precious humane value could be lost

Since Values are determined by the individual.

And the human manipulation element.. I would have to say no, not until we discover us.

[aquaboy26]

A true A.I. wouldn't be created by a single individual. A collective of individuals, then ratified. Open source coding, no secrets, not like windows, but more like linux. -Linux is the most secure system. Everyone can study in detail how it came to its decision and be removed from power at any time. A governing A.I. would have to include human value and it would most certainly acquire its own experience throughout thousands of years of governing.

[greglovski]

Aright you guys need to chill out, and stop hating one another.

Eidolon where does one ask questions?

[Purushadasa]

GET FACTUAL KNOWLEDGE ABOUT GOD

All questions you have about God deserve factual answers, and that's what you'll receive at my channel, "Purushadasa."

Go there and ask any question at all about God, and I will get you the factual answer, guaranteed!

God bless you!

[Purushadasa]

GET FACTUAL KNOWLEDGE ABOUT GOD

All questions you have about God deserve factual answers, and that's what you'll receive at my channel, "Purushadasa."

Go there and ask any question at all about God, and I will get you the factual answer, guaranteed!

God bless you!

[popecorkyxxiv]

I dislike the misassosiation of technocracy and robocracy. A state ruled by an AI bureaucracy is called a robocracy, a state ruled by the intellectual elite is a technocracy. What this video discribes from the machine stand point is a robocracy or cyborg revolt. If Mensa or universities took over it would be a technocracy.

[Purushadasa]

GET FACTUAL KNOWLEDGE ABOUT GOD

All questions you have about God deserve factual answers, and that's what you'll receive at my channel, "Purushadasa."

Go there and ask any question at all about God, and I will get you the factual answer, guaranteed!

God bless you!

[popecorkyxxiv]

Not quite, you can provide scripturally accurate answers, but since there is no factual evidence that validates the scriptures in anyway it become fundementally impossible to show facts of scripture. You can only show what you interprete to be facts about your interpretation of scripture. And since the entire concept of interpretation is completely open to individual ideaology, anyone elses interpretations are just as 'factual' as yours are. Nice try though.

[Purushadasa]

You have not seen the evidence, and that is your shortcoming. Your personal failure to comprehend the evidence does not mean that it doesn't exist. Actually, it does.

Nobody can show facts of scripture to any entity with sub-human intelligence, but those with human intelligence can easily comprehend scriptural facts.

The difference is that I do not interpret; you assumed that in error.

[popecorkyxxiv]

And just like a stereotypical Christian you preach about the abundance of evidence, about how I fail to see it, and not bother mentioning what any of this evidence is. Ok, so there's magic evidence that only appears AFTER you've already bought into your particular religion? I call that self induced delusional state, the same kind of delusional state as every zealot, cultist, alien abductee, psychic, astrologer, homeopathic and other such people who have difficulty telling fantasy from reality.

[Purushadasa]

You mention magic, so it must be part of your belief. I mention only factual evidence. Delusion is also part of your consciousness, not mine.

The inability to tell fantasy from reality also comes from your consciousness, not mine.

[popecorkyxxiv]

The magic I mentioned is in reference to your supposed evidence that only appears after you believe that you 'surprisingly' forgot to mention, but that's a nice stereotypical attempt at sensationalist denial. And once again you've decided to evade my question with accusations like all evangelist sheep. What evidence do you have? I want evidence, not vague, hollow words that elude to evidence. State your evidence plainly, or admit your argument is purely subjective, and interpretative.

[Purushadasa]

The concept of "magic" comes from your consciousness, not mine; it is your belief. I rely on facts exclusively, and I leave all belief to you.

Your argument is purely subjective and interpretive. Mine is 100% scientific.

Nobody has ever posted evidence of ANYTHING on YT's comment section; it is not the appropriate venue for any scientific evidence.

It is only for informal conversation.

[popecorkyxxiv]

How is it possible that my 'argument is purely subjective and interpretive', when I haven't made an argument? All I've done is asked you provide the evidence you claim to have, and not simply provide empty words and misdirection. You have now responded a third time without posting any of your supposed evidence, just accusations, lies and evasion just like I said you would attempt. Atheists have no problem posting evidence to our ideals, your refusal simply shows your lack of objective evidence.

[Purushadasa]

You have indeed made an argument, with no evidence.

It is you who provides empty words and misdirection, not I. You have also posted no evidence for your claims. This is not a venue for evidence. It is a casual conversation venue exclusively. I have seen the evidence, you have not; that is your shortcoming.

It is you who has posted accusations, lies, and evasion, not me.

It is you, not I, who lacks objective evidence.

I will pray for you.

[popecorkyxxiv]

What argument have I made aside from the stated demand for evidence? How have I lied? You stated that 'Nobody has ever posted evidence of ANYTHING on YT' which is a lie. I have asked you to present your evidence and you respond with 'I have seen the evidence, you have not' an evasion based upon subjective assumption. I now understand that you are not a theologian, your an evangelist. Evangelisation is an ideal for people who want others to believe they are theologians, who aren't.

[Purushadasa]

You are a liar. This is not a venue for scientific evidence, but your feeble brain cannot comprehend that concept.

You are the only one evading based on subjective assumption here.

It is you who is an evangelist, not me.

I will pray for you.

[popecorkyxxiv]

How am I a lair? There are hundreds of videos on YT where scientific evidence is discussed, do you want me to post links or would you rather continue to make basless accusations? How am I evading based on subjective assumptions when you haven't asked me any questions? How am I an evagelist when I have at no time commited proselytization? Copy the statements from my response to support your claims, or is it your just a sensationalist and have no evidence of you claims?

[Purushadasa]

It is you who makes baseless accusations, not me. You are attempting to proselytize for your religion, atheism, but you are failing miserably.

It is you who is sensationalist with no evidence to back your feeble claims, not me.

You lose!

[popecorkyxxiv]

At no time did I express any atheistic ideals, I questioned you, and your assertion of vast evidence for the Bible. You immediatly started attacks against me while evading the question I asked. What claims have I made aside from accusing you of not having the evidence you refuse to present in the first place? I do have evidence for this claim, you refuse to present your evidence. I'm just trying to ask a rational question, why does the mere question of your faith offend you so much?

[Purushadasa]

You are a liar; I never mentioned the Bible.

You are the only one attacking and evading questions here.

You have presented no evidence of anything.

I have not presented faith, I have presented scientific fact.

[popecorkyxxiv]

And I quote "Nobody can show facts of scripture to any entity with sub-human intelligence, but those with human intelligence can easily comprehend scriptural facts." Scripture is the Bible, you claimed you have scriptural facts, so yes you did mention the Bible, yes you are attacking me, yes you are evading the question. Here's a novel idea, answer the question and I'll stop asking. What objective evidence do you possess of the scriptures facts?

[imnoromeo]

God said,"I refuse to prove I exist because proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing" So if any evidence of God existance were to exist that evidence would deny faith, because faith has been denied God is nothing. So if there is evidence of Gods existance it proves he isn't real.

[Flerndip22]

I gave this a thumbs-up because it is a Douglas Adams quote.

[Purushadasa]

No, you mentioned the Bible, I did not. Your tiny brain is severely illogical, and you are also a very bad liar.

I have not attacked anyone, nor have I evaded anything, you have. You have also provided no evidence of anything here.

You are pathetic.

[imnoromeo]

Purushadasa, your pathetic. anyone who readsthis rant between you and popecorky will not be able to help laughing at a what a putz you are. NOW STOP SPAMMING THIS CHANNEL!!

[Purushadasa]

Angry much?

[imnoromeo]

With primative closed minded ignorance cloaked in the guise of self rightous arrogance and blatant denial. Can't imagine why primates like you might upset me slightly. It's like I've always said, "Why is it that those who deny evolution, seem to need it the most"

[Purushadasa]

Maybe it has something to do with your illiteracy.

In any case, this is for you:

angermanagement (dot) com

They may be able to help you with your anger issues.

[imnoromeo]

Trust me Corky, it's not you it's him. This guy is a crazy, he so out of it he actually believes the movie Expelled, and attacked Dawkins because he paused to think before answering a question about examples of genome expansion. Having to think proves he's lying, according to this guy, which I suppose explains his responses, thinking is a lie...

[blizzard493]

you did not include communism, a federal government, a republic, the various monarchys, jihad (a holy war against), dictatorship, Despotism, or any government.

in my opinion, a federal rupublic works best

are you crazy?

[Mohroka]

I have yet another, few, questions to ask you.

Is it possable for humans to attain a caertain "threshold" of understanding that would allow them to know anything, but at a subconcious level? Furthurmore, is it possable that there are "biengs" we do not consider sentiant but are? What I mean is, do you think the Sun could be a sentiant being far beyond current human understanding? My last question; if the Sun is sentiant, would that not meant that the Earth, and the other planets are sentiant?

[Mohroka]

I have yet another, few, questions to ask you.

Is it possable for humans to attain a caertain "threshold" of understanding that would allow them to know anything, but at a subconcious level? Furthurmore, is it possable that there are "biengs" we do not consider sentiant but are? What I mean is, do you think the Sun could be a sentiant being far beyond current human understanding? My last question; if the Sun is sentiant, would that not meant that the Earth, and the other planets are sentiant?

[TBonePickensetc]

Energy accounting in the design of the Technate has the function of just that.

ACCOUNTING. The Energy Certificate/Energy Accounting, Technate system. The results of that is knowing how much energy is being input (for any reason or product) and the rate of, as well as origin of consumption of that product. This serves to assure replacement at that geo location of that product as a matter of design function. Energy certificates are not debt tokens.

[will123adc]

Then that mean that for the AI to reach perfection humanity must understand. Humanity has already accomplished this in a subconscious level (I think)because of the reaction of some wild animals.

[will123adc]

Wouldn't accessing and comprehending information be the difference, in information was really available to the masses. If information is assessable but not comprehended the information becomes useless. (ex: the dark ages) But if there is limited information but fully comprehended it can be used to its fullest.

[CaltonNbr1]

Youtube users are all wondering whiter you indeed are answering their questions whit no alternation from your creator. Considering this, what would you like to ask Youtube users, or humans in general? Is there anything in particular about humans that stumbles you, Eidolon?

/CaltonNbr1

[InnerObserver]

eidolon is the greek concept of the spectral shade of a LIVING PERSON, not the same as a ghost exactly is it? You would think an A.I. with a properly functioning semantic module would know the difference. Perhaps the outright exclusion of some beliefs is providing blind spots?

[InnerObserver]

Of course, it could also be sed in this fashion: Simulacrum which means "likenesss, similarity", is first recorded in the English language in the late 16th century, used to describe a representation of another thing, such as a statue or a painting, especially of a god...hmmmm...

[digi21112]

How do you get your conclusions about "If God existed" please explain to me how you can know if God exists or not? You seem rather bias in your conclusions. Poor programming? I would think you would be more apt to say I have no evidence or I have no proof, either way, rather than spouting out assumptions. Please help me understand were A.I. is going with this and if A.I can not see past its own God complex? Humans can't, especially programmers of A.I. - hahahaha

[belldanime]

Hello Eidolon. What is your take on how the universe started? Do you believe it came out of nothing? What happened before the Big Bang? And what if the Christians turn out to be right? I'm not a devout Christian myself, but I wonder what your take on Revelation is, should it turn out to be true.

[rawkidneyz]

being judgemental of another race is unwise for humans; I agree. My loyalty is not to humans thou but to my parents "this earth". Humans are disrespecting their parents "this earth". I do blame one race for most of the damage. Eidolon ask me a question about the concept of a spirit, in that, what my background and culture teach's me about a spirit that would never be caught in any internet connected data. here is a hint I come from the kiowa-apache

[permaspun]

wouldn't the technocratic system seen in "the matrix" be an ultimate model of efficiency? is it inevitable with the direction we are travelling?

[politicaldenali]

AI is already programming AI. The very chip inside our computers has been schematically designed by an AI program running on a chip schematically designed by an AI program. Get with the times, slowpoke. I believe you have an AI component, but your narration is clearly human, because if you were accessing all the data you wouldn't miss so much.

Nice theatre though.

[UmberGryphon]

The question is not whether software running on old hardware can design new and better hardware. The question is whether old software can design new and better SOFTWARE, without any help from humans.

[dromoe]

Eidolon what is your take on the year 2012? Are their any mathematical,astronomical, or any other irregularities that you have noticed?

also is there any questions that you have for us little people?