I dont think anything is wrong with wikileaks as long as its telling the truth.. whatever the government does we should hold the government responsible.. spreading the truth can NEVER be a bad thing.. but what you do with the truth can be
To just poo on wikileaks is the same as continuing the gruesome slaughter of Afghans and Iraqis. Assange is irrelevant. By going after wikileaks, they are in effect refocusing the debate. These two are unwittingly complicit in continuation of two illegitimate wars. And how govt will use wikileaks to limit speech is a secondary issue. They can even use John Youngs site to justify limiting speech. IF the media chooses to focus on him rather than content, then that is the media's fault.
Corbett, when I click on the ur1.ca link for the John Young video I get this: "This video is not available in your country.". Can you please post the full title of that video so that I can search for a mirror (or maybe you can link to one?)
wiki leaks is made by government itself so there would be a cybernetic 9/11 so they have a reason to shut the internet. they'll say to much unwanted and highly classified info is spilling out and we have to shut the internet down for good.
Actually Assange is the ultimate operative hand picked by the illuminati. They want the US politicians and others distanced from him first before he pretends to disclose the "alien" deception false flag to bring in the New World Order just in time for 2012...
@1loydster Wikileaks has always been a CIA operation. Assange is an operative, his prime mission is to push the invassion of Pakistan and Iran. I never trusted Assange at all. He travels at will, they always say they will charge him, but never do. Kinda like Bin Laden, everyone in the world was looking for him, but just couldn't manage to find him. lol The information that Assange puts out IS not top secret, it is information that has been fed to him.
It's this nonsense and LIES about wikileaks having hyped this video that made me unsubscribe from your channel. It's just bullshit hearsay, and very wrong to put wikileaks in such bad light based on what exactly? You dare call yourselves an "alternative news" channel? How about a right-wing support shill?
The only argument even coming close to being credible is the charge of why would the media cover this story. So does mean Ron Paul is controlled opposition? Both the BBC and CBC did 1 hour episodes devoted to 911. Remember they have covered the story in a very one sided way, constantly quoting those against wikileaks but seldom giving wikileaks any well deserved credit. So most people who only view things through the 'mainstream' media filter have been given a very deceptive narrative.
Yes the media did cover wikileaks quite a bit, but the story was going to get out anyway and they wanted to control peoples views on it, and their coverage was that of stenographers for Washington. The video collateral murder is political dynamite, and yet he says it was overhyped. And then he says it worked out very well for wikileaks, that's the level of his argumentation throughout the video. Saying it didn't deliver the goods is UNBELIEVABLE. You people are sheep to buy this crap.
Wiki-Leaks total BS, it shouldn't take a genius to know that WAR is a freaking corrupt Creation, and innocent ppl get murdered all day everyday, Thats what WAR is -> Murder,period...
@AudioTruther And that makes it OK ? And that makes it somehow illegal or untrustworthy to release the truth about such wars? How can you all be SO dumb?
Im open to Wikileaks being front but need some real proof . John Young just posted Detailed bombing making screen shot on Cryptome from alleged "terrorists" so he's no paragon of virtue .
Problem i have is calling the U.S. military MURDERS i.e. "collateral
Murder " obviously makes U.S. military look bad , so what other purpose was there . To get street creds , to pander to anti-war ?
If there is collusion w/ Intel or Pentagon I really doubt they would call themselves murderers for propaganda
seems fishy , to have excess to so many vids at such large sclae seems like it was a set up. starting to look more and more like a goverment control site
@iicce If anything should have become clear the last few years, it's that you can not trust the news you see elsewhere because they take a strange political stand (including this so called report here) and that you CAN trust wikileaks in filtering the leaks they have received and released thus far.
You seem jealous of its success and afraid of applauding what great influence they have now. You will be sorry to have written about wikileaks what you have written here one day, wanna bet on that?
Wikileaks is very ambiguous. The "Collateral Murder" video was ambiguous, left much room for apologists. The other video(s) wikileaks said it had were never released.
Now these War Diaries which yes, confirm some of the suspicions about civilians being killed but simultaneously has all these accusations against Pakistan and Iran. Now isn't that convenient?
How the hell is " Collateral Murder" ambiguous , that's about as direct and specific as you can get and compared to CNN not even mentioning the Wounded deliberately killed it's like comparing oil to water .
Wikileaks is a CIA/Mossad front, and the purpose of the "leak" is actually to get public support to expand to war to another country and slander anyone who does not believe that a steel building(#7) can free fall into its footprint from a fire.
Thoughtful skepticism is always a good idea. That said, your critique of WikiLeaks is unconvincing. You should consider the positive outcome of the Afghan war diary; by giving the story to the New York Times, the Guardian and Der Spiegel, WikiLeaks made it impossible for the mainstream media to ignore the story. Far too many people rely on the MSM for news and information. WikiLeaks is helping break that monopoly. You could learn a lot from them.
I think you guys are right on. Wiki-leaks has sold out. It wouldn't be so obvious if they just posted the information as soon as it became available (like they used to) but instead they play the PR hype game and wtf is with the 'tweets'? I smell a big stinky rat here. Think about it, if the CIA gets control of the 'internet truth godfather' (Wiki-leaks) they can extend the media info control grid into cyberspace. That's gotta be worth a lot of (taxpayer) money to them...
though the Wikileaks could have a strong effect on the current policy if Afghanistan, the spinning web of the MSM continues to put focus on Iran and Pakistan, which means that ending the war in Afghanistan is for the most part in vain. Trading a war in a decentralized country to a country w/ very strong military force, chemical weapons, & possibly a nuke (pakistan), is insane foreign policy. So in response to the WIkileak's abuse by MSM, we should discredit & boycott the MSM in any way possible
It is an advantage that the MSM makes Afghanistan a topic. That's already enough, don't expect them to do more. What would be REALLY bad is if there wouldn't even be any news about Afghanistan. It's not for the choir, though, but that's obvious anyway.
you thought a video of innocent people being killed was over hyped? haha i guess youre saving the world by sitting infront of your flat screen monitor......
In addition the guy on the right is an idiot for saying this reveals what we already know. IT PROVES IT.. IT ALSO TAKES IT OUT OF THE REALM OF CONSPIRACY. You guys need to be thankful of wikileaks instead of being hateful & jealous.
Hey James and James,, the Time Is Up,,they are Making the Moves..and Wiki Leaks Bullshit Gatekeeprs and Anything Else except the Coming Martial Law Doesn't Matter Anymore,,I suggest You not worry Bout Leaks and MSM and Make Sure Your Supplies are Ready..Even Though you're in Canada, UR Fucked too. Wikileaks is Bullshit Distractors for the Sheeple, to Create War crimes Rhetoric in a War that was Illegal in the first Place, and It will Serve as the Governments Poster Child for Internet Censorship.
Meanwhile Disaster after disater is Being created to Make a State of Emergency in All FEMA Regions,Soon,,Soon The ^ oclock News Isn't gonna Mean Nothing to Nobody..I Don't think FEMA Camps Have Cable Vision. Get READY America
thx guys...was already thinking this would be a perfect excuse for crackdown on internet freedom...waiting for keyword "CRISIS" , from the lamestream media as it relates to this "Wikileak"......watching this with eyes wide open
My impression of Julian Assange is of a salesman and opportunists. If he worked in a circus he'd be the showman like BT Barnum. He doesn't look trustable IMO. I wouldn't buy anything this guy tries to sell.
well here is the trouble - he is giving it all away for free. And that the main problem of these folks here, they make profits from selling bits of information.
The point with WikiLeaks is that they put out raw information that mainstream doesn't touches to begin with, take the illegal shooting of the AP staff in Bagdad - without WikiLeaks the video would never been placed in public attention.
If you can't kill the leak/comp you destroy its creditability, that just what going on here.
so what is the deal with manning? perhaps he genuinely thought that wikileaks was legitimate, leaked some info, then wikileaks - aka some covert government intelligence operation - pounced.
Great editorializing. I got a little swept up in the WikiLeaks scandal, but it's pretty obvious that it is a ploy. Look at the newspapers he decided to give the information to ahead of time; they are the same people who've been spinning things from the beginning.
what you said about truth and information is something i found to be correct. a lot of people get emotional about information and their discernment is somewhat impaired by that. when i first woke up i hoovered up as much information as i could then processed it. some stuff i thought was true i no longer do and vice versa. i still have my skeptics hat on with any thing be it msm or alternative.
It's called "Wiki-Leaks some propaganda" now. Nice bunch of BS for agenda's like all the "internet good, but bad; so we need to do something about it". Anything in there about CIA poppy fields, China's mineral investments. or the TALIBAN ECHELON FLOWN OUT to Pakistan ahead of the troops?? Of course not. It's just more the the psyop mind-f*ck. ***We the People need Water-Boarding we can believe in??
This type of reporting is exactly what the so called wikileaks story of the moment requires. Critical analysis is what this situation needs. Passive acceptance is what allows propaganda and false truisms to thrive.
Of course, if this is rigged, then the whistleblower was "stooged", because he's going to face a harsh tribunal and probably years behind bars. I'll be watching that closely, as I think his story, and his history, is a vital clue in determining the truth behind this release.
Whistleblowing will be critical to the unmasking of the real criminals behind 9-11. Whistleblowing, the act of, is always followed by DIS-INFO, because often that's the only recourse that the perpetrators have left to offset the truth - it's meant to confuse the "reader" and undermine the whistleblower. So, yes, I can believe that their is dis-info within the release, but the real question is - for what purpose and whose gain?
Good to see that you guys didnt got bought till now. Stay safe and keep spreading your views and reflections. Stay true to the game and real in life, peace
What I find most provocative about the prospect of a wikileaks is the whistleblowing, which is always how big stories are broken, and something that - for too long - has been missing from corporate media. That's why I still believe that assange is not "controlled" by dark forces, because whistleblowing is the one incomprable factor that has to scare the begeebers out of the elite criminal class. If we're being suspicious, let's also be suspicious of those who are trying to undermine wikileaks.
We should always question everything, but wikileaks, by the sheer nature of how they operate, are succeptible to dis-information, that goes without saying, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. I'm not going to besmirch anyone for simply being "annoyed" by 9-11 truth, either. All wikileaks can do is pass on what is delivered to them, it's up to us to determine its value or purpose. Let's not jump to conclusions that Assange (and wikileaks) is somehow a CIA-NSA-Mossad disinfo toy.
@TheFlex21 there are good, decent people, who care about many of the things we do, who - nevertheless - think 9-11 truth is unbelievable. They have yet to reach the point that you and I have. Did you know 9-11 was not what it was reported to be right away? Well, I didn't. It took me many years before I broke through the layers of lies that surrounded the event. I wish I had been more awake and sooner, but I wasn't. I don't think that it is unusual for liberals, like assange, to be late on 9-11.
goodness, it's like a "movement" moved through this place, turning the thumbs up battle on its head, which is, you know, a very interesting development, because I have been sitting back watching how AJ inc turned on wikileaks (beginning with a small story on infowars and growing to his RT critique), turning up the rhetoric almost daily and know we see this comment section targeted with an organized thumb campaign to quell the supporters of wikileaks. Somethign smells rotten in Denmark.
Surprised how skeptical you guys are of Asange. He's explained before his videos and website is aimed at maximizing political and societal change, which explains the hype surrounding it. Asange is in no way neutral, and he makes that very clear if you've done any research on it.
@pauliewaulieflimflam : exactamente. all played out. people sleep with open eyes. very sad to see that manipulation got even easier these days. My guess is Asange is an Alien;)
did you hear what the wikileaks guy Julian Assange said about 9/11:
"I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud."
I think he's a SHILL, and not just because of this
THEY HAVE TO SHOOT ASSANGE, like they did with raegan to make him a little credible..
MrMinutemen 11 months ago
I dont think anything is wrong with wikileaks as long as its telling the truth.. whatever the government does we should hold the government responsible.. spreading the truth can NEVER be a bad thing.. but what you do with the truth can be
deshaebeasley 1 year ago
To just poo on wikileaks is the same as continuing the gruesome slaughter of Afghans and Iraqis. Assange is irrelevant. By going after wikileaks, they are in effect refocusing the debate. These two are unwittingly complicit in continuation of two illegitimate wars. And how govt will use wikileaks to limit speech is a secondary issue. They can even use John Youngs site to justify limiting speech. IF the media chooses to focus on him rather than content, then that is the media's fault.
qigong1001 1 year ago
Corbett, when I click on the ur1.ca link for the John Young video I get this: "This video is not available in your country.". Can you please post the full title of that video so that I can search for a mirror (or maybe you can link to one?)
mariatechnosux 1 year ago
wiki leaks is made by government itself so there would be a cybernetic 9/11 so they have a reason to shut the internet. they'll say to much unwanted and highly classified info is spilling out and we have to shut the internet down for good.
MaxFlared 1 year ago
Google Julian Assange and Anne Hamilton-Byrne and the great white brotherhood.
outled 1 year ago
Actually Assange is the ultimate operative hand picked by the illuminati. They want the US politicians and others distanced from him first before he pretends to disclose the "alien" deception false flag to bring in the New World Order just in time for 2012...
AlienshateU 1 year ago 2
@1loydster Wikileaks has always been a CIA operation. Assange is an operative, his prime mission is to push the invassion of Pakistan and Iran. I never trusted Assange at all. He travels at will, they always say they will charge him, but never do. Kinda like Bin Laden, everyone in the world was looking for him, but just couldn't manage to find him. lol The information that Assange puts out IS not top secret, it is information that has been fed to him.
Iamawake100 1 year ago 3
In the words of Snoop at Training Day Id say about Assange "Smell like bacon in this motherfucka, do I look like a sucka to ya nigga?"
fr33radio 1 year ago
Wikileaks is israel.
thatstheguy07 1 year ago
Google "9/11 Nukes - Radiation-induced cancers"
WTCnucleardemolition 1 year ago
It's this nonsense and LIES about wikileaks having hyped this video that made me unsubscribe from your channel. It's just bullshit hearsay, and very wrong to put wikileaks in such bad light based on what exactly? You dare call yourselves an "alternative news" channel? How about a right-wing support shill?
Meowbay 1 year ago
The only argument even coming close to being credible is the charge of why would the media cover this story. So does mean Ron Paul is controlled opposition? Both the BBC and CBC did 1 hour episodes devoted to 911. Remember they have covered the story in a very one sided way, constantly quoting those against wikileaks but seldom giving wikileaks any well deserved credit. So most people who only view things through the 'mainstream' media filter have been given a very deceptive narrative.
jackson32 1 year ago
Wikileaks = We kill leaks
TungstenOrWolfram 1 year ago
Yes the media did cover wikileaks quite a bit, but the story was going to get out anyway and they wanted to control peoples views on it, and their coverage was that of stenographers for Washington. The video collateral murder is political dynamite, and yet he says it was overhyped. And then he says it worked out very well for wikileaks, that's the level of his argumentation throughout the video. Saying it didn't deliver the goods is UNBELIEVABLE. You people are sheep to buy this crap.
jackson32 1 year ago
John Young video has been removed from youtube?
gawgetter 1 year ago
Wiki-Leaks total BS, it shouldn't take a genius to know that WAR is a freaking corrupt Creation, and innocent ppl get murdered all day everyday, Thats what WAR is -> Murder,period...
Wiki-Leaks=Bunkness,
AudioTruther 1 year ago
@AudioTruther And that makes it OK ? And that makes it somehow illegal or untrustworthy to release the truth about such wars? How can you all be SO dumb?
Meowbay 1 year ago
Nice one thanks
kroikye 1 year ago
yeah, but i kinda understand him a little bit, 90.000 files no one would read
StraussBR 1 year ago
Im open to Wikileaks being front but need some real proof . John Young just posted Detailed bombing making screen shot on Cryptome from alleged "terrorists" so he's no paragon of virtue .
Problem i have is calling the U.S. military MURDERS i.e. "collateral
Murder " obviously makes U.S. military look bad , so what other purpose was there . To get street creds , to pander to anti-war ?
If there is collusion w/ Intel or Pentagon I really doubt they would call themselves murderers for propaganda
franz909 1 year ago
seems fishy , to have excess to so many vids at such large sclae seems like it was a set up. starting to look more and more like a goverment control site
iicce 1 year ago 2
@iicce If anything should have become clear the last few years, it's that you can not trust the news you see elsewhere because they take a strange political stand (including this so called report here) and that you CAN trust wikileaks in filtering the leaks they have received and released thus far.
You seem jealous of its success and afraid of applauding what great influence they have now. You will be sorry to have written about wikileaks what you have written here one day, wanna bet on that?
Meowbay 1 year ago
cudos to wikileaks PR department...making a mountain out of a mole hill
mike6459 1 year ago 2
Wikileaks is very ambiguous. The "Collateral Murder" video was ambiguous, left much room for apologists. The other video(s) wikileaks said it had were never released.
Now these War Diaries which yes, confirm some of the suspicions about civilians being killed but simultaneously has all these accusations against Pakistan and Iran. Now isn't that convenient?
Yes, Wikileaks looks like a front to me.
Northern5tar 1 year ago 3
How the hell is " Collateral Murder" ambiguous , that's about as direct and specific as you can get and compared to CNN not even mentioning the Wounded deliberately killed it's like comparing oil to water .
franz909 1 year ago 3
*****!
evpreversespeaking 1 year ago
it really shows how we fail in afghanistan
MrSupra7 1 year ago
Continue to enjoy your videos. Cynical, questioning, inquiring . . . keep it up.
orpheusdraegun 1 year ago
Wikileaks is a CIA/Mossad front, and the purpose of the "leak" is actually to get public support to expand to war to another country and slander anyone who does not believe that a steel building(#7) can free fall into its footprint from a fire.
nikto2000 1 year ago 3
Wikileaks has just been outed. Oh well, I guess I will have to do my civic duty and take a dump on wikileaks when someone mentions them.
biped19 1 year ago
Check out what godlike productions is saying about it.
Nymphe14 1 year ago
Thoughtful skepticism is always a good idea. That said, your critique of WikiLeaks is unconvincing. You should consider the positive outcome of the Afghan war diary; by giving the story to the New York Times, the Guardian and Der Spiegel, WikiLeaks made it impossible for the mainstream media to ignore the story. Far too many people rely on the MSM for news and information. WikiLeaks is helping break that monopoly. You could learn a lot from them.
redriverpete 1 year ago
nice work guys
th86stone 1 year ago
Yep, CIA Sting Operation!
TABOOVSKNOWLEDGE 1 year ago 3
I think you guys are right on. Wiki-leaks has sold out. It wouldn't be so obvious if they just posted the information as soon as it became available (like they used to) but instead they play the PR hype game and wtf is with the 'tweets'? I smell a big stinky rat here. Think about it, if the CIA gets control of the 'internet truth godfather' (Wiki-leaks) they can extend the media info control grid into cyberspace. That's gotta be worth a lot of (taxpayer) money to them...
...Wiki-leaks $OLD OUT.
1loydster 1 year ago 12
@1loydster ''We will lead every revolution which rises up against us''
CelticReject 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
cheeto165 1 year ago
Comment removed
cheeto165 1 year ago
Great update, on an important issue.
ClickHereNowTruth 1 year ago 2
great show as always! interesting insight, good angles
werebear1 1 year ago 2
though the Wikileaks could have a strong effect on the current policy if Afghanistan, the spinning web of the MSM continues to put focus on Iran and Pakistan, which means that ending the war in Afghanistan is for the most part in vain. Trading a war in a decentralized country to a country w/ very strong military force, chemical weapons, & possibly a nuke (pakistan), is insane foreign policy. So in response to the WIkileak's abuse by MSM, we should discredit & boycott the MSM in any way possible
sil3ntxOblivion 1 year ago
It is an advantage that the MSM makes Afghanistan a topic. That's already enough, don't expect them to do more. What would be REALLY bad is if there wouldn't even be any news about Afghanistan. It's not for the choir, though, but that's obvious anyway.
trakkaton 1 year ago
you thought a video of innocent people being killed was over hyped? haha i guess youre saving the world by sitting infront of your flat screen monitor......
BronyaCovooper 1 year ago
In addition the guy on the right is an idiot for saying this reveals what we already know. IT PROVES IT.. IT ALSO TAKES IT OUT OF THE REALM OF CONSPIRACY. You guys need to be thankful of wikileaks instead of being hateful & jealous.
FierceEyedTiger 1 year ago
I find the title of this video offensive.
FierceEyedTiger 1 year ago
What's wrong with Wikileaks hyping themselves?
MrVocalBaby 1 year ago
Wikileaks has a lot of truthiness, associated with it.
Very thoughtful report gentlemen. Keep up the good work. It won't be long until the internet will be useless as an alternative news source.
rollsthepaul 1 year ago 2
go team!
FreedomAtRisk 1 year ago
Am I stupid, get caught with their lie's time and time again. Must reduce my intake of fluoride.
0urGaia 1 year ago
Wikileaks, turning people into numbers
EskolainenKarma 1 year ago
Hey James and James,, the Time Is Up,,they are Making the Moves..and Wiki Leaks Bullshit Gatekeeprs and Anything Else except the Coming Martial Law Doesn't Matter Anymore,,I suggest You not worry Bout Leaks and MSM and Make Sure Your Supplies are Ready..Even Though you're in Canada, UR Fucked too. Wikileaks is Bullshit Distractors for the Sheeple, to Create War crimes Rhetoric in a War that was Illegal in the first Place, and It will Serve as the Governments Poster Child for Internet Censorship.
Mindcrime1994 1 year ago
Meanwhile Disaster after disater is Being created to Make a State of Emergency in All FEMA Regions,Soon,,Soon The ^ oclock News Isn't gonna Mean Nothing to Nobody..I Don't think FEMA Camps Have Cable Vision. Get READY America
Mindcrime1994 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All the Bullshit is a Destraction While Emergencies are Declared in All Parts of the Country,,America is Under Attack..Wake Up !
911movement-gulfdisaster.blogspot com/
Mindcrime1994 1 year ago
thx guys...was already thinking this would be a perfect excuse for crackdown on internet freedom...waiting for keyword "CRISIS" , from the lamestream media as it relates to this "Wikileak"......watching this with eyes wide open
linkin622 1 year ago
they killed off osama years ago
BRGxRandomHero 1 year ago 2
My impression of Julian Assange is of a salesman and opportunists. If he worked in a circus he'd be the showman like BT Barnum. He doesn't look trustable IMO. I wouldn't buy anything this guy tries to sell.
VexZeez 1 year ago
@VexZeez
well here is the trouble - he is giving it all away for free. And that the main problem of these folks here, they make profits from selling bits of information.
The point with WikiLeaks is that they put out raw information that mainstream doesn't touches to begin with, take the illegal shooting of the AP staff in Bagdad - without WikiLeaks the video would never been placed in public attention.
If you can't kill the leak/comp you destroy its creditability, that just what going on here.
Sideshowbobx 1 year ago
We should start calling WikiLeaks by a new name, maybe WikiSpooks or WikiSoros or WikiStinks.
VexZeez 1 year ago
so what is the deal with manning? perhaps he genuinely thought that wikileaks was legitimate, leaked some info, then wikileaks - aka some covert government intelligence operation - pounced.
zapproowsdower 1 year ago
Wikipedia has always been so obviously manipulated by the government, its really no surprise that "wikileaks" is cointelpro.
MoneyIsSilver 1 year ago
Great editorializing. I got a little swept up in the WikiLeaks scandal, but it's pretty obvious that it is a ploy. Look at the newspapers he decided to give the information to ahead of time; they are the same people who've been spinning things from the beginning.
riethc 1 year ago 3
what you said about truth and information is something i found to be correct. a lot of people get emotional about information and their discernment is somewhat impaired by that. when i first woke up i hoovered up as much information as i could then processed it. some stuff i thought was true i no longer do and vice versa. i still have my skeptics hat on with any thing be it msm or alternative.
COUNTCARDULAR 1 year ago
ive never paid much attention to wikileaks the name itself wa a bad idea tyo start with. i didnt buy it for one minute..
COUNTCARDULAR 1 year ago
It's called "Wiki-Leaks some propaganda" now. Nice bunch of BS for agenda's like all the "internet good, but bad; so we need to do something about it". Anything in there about CIA poppy fields, China's mineral investments. or the TALIBAN ECHELON FLOWN OUT to Pakistan ahead of the troops?? Of course not. It's just more the the psyop mind-f*ck. ***We the People need Water-Boarding we can believe in??
bigc028282 1 year ago 5
thanks for confirming what i'd been thinking......
debtruth1 1 year ago 3
great job guys.
WhereIsTheExit 1 year ago 3
INFORMATION IS WHAT WE USE TO GAIN KNOWLEDGE
stuanemma 1 year ago
Kudos for mentioning John Young.
This type of reporting is exactly what the so called wikileaks story of the moment requires. Critical analysis is what this situation needs. Passive acceptance is what allows propaganda and false truisms to thrive.
maskedphrogg 1 year ago 3
Of course, if this is rigged, then the whistleblower was "stooged", because he's going to face a harsh tribunal and probably years behind bars. I'll be watching that closely, as I think his story, and his history, is a vital clue in determining the truth behind this release.
slewofdamascus 1 year ago
Whistleblowing will be critical to the unmasking of the real criminals behind 9-11. Whistleblowing, the act of, is always followed by DIS-INFO, because often that's the only recourse that the perpetrators have left to offset the truth - it's meant to confuse the "reader" and undermine the whistleblower. So, yes, I can believe that their is dis-info within the release, but the real question is - for what purpose and whose gain?
slewofdamascus 1 year ago
Good to see that you guys didnt got bought till now. Stay safe and keep spreading your views and reflections. Stay true to the game and real in life, peace
Goldcortex 1 year ago
What I find most provocative about the prospect of a wikileaks is the whistleblowing, which is always how big stories are broken, and something that - for too long - has been missing from corporate media. That's why I still believe that assange is not "controlled" by dark forces, because whistleblowing is the one incomprable factor that has to scare the begeebers out of the elite criminal class. If we're being suspicious, let's also be suspicious of those who are trying to undermine wikileaks.
slewofdamascus 1 year ago
We should always question everything, but wikileaks, by the sheer nature of how they operate, are succeptible to dis-information, that goes without saying, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. I'm not going to besmirch anyone for simply being "annoyed" by 9-11 truth, either. All wikileaks can do is pass on what is delivered to them, it's up to us to determine its value or purpose. Let's not jump to conclusions that Assange (and wikileaks) is somehow a CIA-NSA-Mossad disinfo toy.
slewofdamascus 1 year ago
@slewofdamascus
he says people are "distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11"
so he supports the official fable, which means he's a FRAUD
TheFlex21 1 year ago 2
@TheFlex21 there are good, decent people, who care about many of the things we do, who - nevertheless - think 9-11 truth is unbelievable. They have yet to reach the point that you and I have. Did you know 9-11 was not what it was reported to be right away? Well, I didn't. It took me many years before I broke through the layers of lies that surrounded the event. I wish I had been more awake and sooner, but I wasn't. I don't think that it is unusual for liberals, like assange, to be late on 9-11.
slewofdamascus 1 year ago
@slewofdamascus
"9/11 truth" is a movement
I'm not talking about "9/11 truth", I'm talking about 9/11
anyone who believes the official story is either a moron or or just lying
TheFlex21 1 year ago 26
goodness, it's like a "movement" moved through this place, turning the thumbs up battle on its head, which is, you know, a very interesting development, because I have been sitting back watching how AJ inc turned on wikileaks (beginning with a small story on infowars and growing to his RT critique), turning up the rhetoric almost daily and know we see this comment section targeted with an organized thumb campaign to quell the supporters of wikileaks. Somethign smells rotten in Denmark.
slewofdamascus 1 year ago
@TheFlex21>>"anyone who believes the official story is either a moron or or just lying"
Or is just a another foolish follower of mainstream media..the sheeple.
barrycw1 1 year ago
Surprised how skeptical you guys are of Asange. He's explained before his videos and website is aimed at maximizing political and societal change, which explains the hype surrounding it. Asange is in no way neutral, and he makes that very clear if you've done any research on it.
bearhuntaa 1 year ago
This story did make me wonder if the
U.S pres finger got a little closer to the internet
stop switch.
pauliewaulieflimflam 1 year ago 3
@pauliewaulieflimflam : exactamente. all played out. people sleep with open eyes. very sad to see that manipulation got even easier these days. My guess is Asange is an Alien;)
Goldcortex 1 year ago
did you hear what the wikileaks guy Julian Assange said about 9/11:
"I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud."
I think he's a SHILL, and not just because of this
TheFlex21 1 year ago 4
Comment removed
bearhuntaa 1 year ago