In order for an idea to show "value", does it not have to show an application or use? If your idea is not useful, per se, as having the ability of being used to fuel more thinking that is useful, it must be applicable to the real world. e.g. string theory suggests 11 spatial dimensions (totally useless to us), but it also attempts to explain subatomic particles that we are trying to find. In order to be applicable, they must be compatible with existing convention.
Google search think-strategically-now for another great ebook. It takes a holistic approach to thinking Strategically rather than lateral.. I highly suggest
creativity is largely the ability to respond. the ability to appreciate what constitutes creativity is dictated by the expectations of the observer. a child may not be able to respond directly to his/her circumstances but may find alternative possibilities. the question is whether we can discern their response. so creativity is really relationship of doer and beholder. making a loud noise may get our attention because we're too busy to read the subtler signals thus stiffling other expressions.
IF creative thinking is a skill that can be learned, then why has Mr. de Bono produced nothing else besides books about it? If creative thinking was learnable, as he says, wouldn't he himself also be an artist, engineer or inventor?
One of the most important points he makes is how little education has been applied to "learning the skill" of creative thought. Most people think you are creative or not (eg: you have blue eyes or not). But creativity is a SKILL we all have the ability & responsibility to develop. Especially in this day and age, people NEED to learn these skills. Just this morning I was introduced to a great website: therightbraininitiative financially supported through the Gate Foundation. YAY!
I must say I agree with Mr. de Bon0- and from Playright to mataphysician, from parapsychologist If you go to my you tube you will see how out of the box I think. Its never called lateral thinking though it most certainly is, its called crazy by those dull in the box brains.lol Thank you for the approval. I am an artist too and am amazed at how innovative this new generation is
creative thinking and lateral thinkging has been going on for millennium.pathetic current generation need to listen to a doctor i how to think instead of him helping third world people with their health problems and reduce child motality. waste of medical education.
This actually kind of sad. There are much better places and people to go to learn about creativity. I guess if you are a non-creative person looking for non-creative person to teach you to be creativity, Edward is your man.
If you are creative, NO MORE SECOND HAND ART or Natalie Goldberg stuff would be a better place to start if you are box person who suspects there is universe outside the box.
@dasocks There is a danger in ones intellectual life is to make pronouncement and assertions that are the absolute truth. Doing so will tend to lock one into one point of view. If creatively you are exploring an idea or a theme, you need to do that for a time, but it is not a good thing to stay there. I can understand Edward's point of view in a post modern world, creatively you want to keep your options and choices open. When you say this is The Truth, it locks up your creativity.
@eotto2001 yer. well its all down to what you choose to learn from him. He knows alot of stuff. I particularly liked his explanation of the "clash system" maybe that is on you tube somewhere
@eotto2001 Hello. I feel de Bono touches on important elements of thinking that can be applied to creativity. Some of these "tibits" have inspired me instantly. I'm glad to hear what he has to say. Apparently he wants to teach people how to be creative. As a creative person, I think he speaks well. He doesn't always try to sell something. Buried in this video is de Bono speaking in a timeless manner. Not all the ideas are new but as "they" say: some things are worth repeating.
A lot of people who listen to Edward de Bono speak truly believe that "it's already been done" or that they "already do that". After several years as a member of a Thinking Club dedicated to the actual practice and application of de Bono's thinking principles, I can assure you that "it has not" and "they do not". Just grab a copy of "de Bono's Thinking Course", read through it, do the exercises, and you'll see for yourself. You'll get real-world results by applying his methods on a daily basis.
Much of the tools he refers to, had been used by scientists, philosophers, and creative thinkers before and after the Greeks throughout the history. Do we believe him or the evidence that we see before us. Pick up a mathematics book, pick up a physics book, the theories of social and political science. How does any of this constitute the state of standstill?
Debono does make grand sweeping claims that seem too farfetched but I think much of what he say's is important. He claims that philosophy is basically about word games, well, maybe a lot of it, no doubt. I think our major problem is that we allow the primitive (esp sexual) brain to get the march on our better selves. I should think that much of what Debono recommends could well remedy that problem. The key issue is empathy, he has an equivalent acronym but not that original surely.
I really enjoy his speaking style. Old school, to the point and very well spoken. No fake hype, no loud backslapping campy speaking style (though I enjoy that style also). I could listen to him for hours. He's serious because he is passionate and an excellent communicator and educator. Mr de Bono is great! Easy to take notes to. He is very cool. I'd pay money to hear him in person. I just stumbled onto this and find his concepts very interesting. Mr. de Bono Thank you for posting this.
Why? because most people can't even define creativity. Most people believe that only the exceptions among us are creative. Most people don't MAKE music because they believe they CAN'T because they aren't creative.
Hey if you want to take your mind into a new direction, take a look at kerou(.)net
He's a new cartoonist that tends toward the intellectual. I think he'll be big in a few years time see it before its all old news. I read it and it sets your brain going.
- why did the Greeks produce the GG3 and then go impotent for 2400 years? The chinese as far as I am aware continued to contribute in many ways or am I wrong?
- To suggest that man has stopped thinking for 2400 years is an insult to humanity, isn't it? or perhaps you are referring to west, in which case you may be correct in assuming that no thinking did occur until the 16th or 17th century. Oh! Perhaps you meant before "lateral thinking".
Its true though,your already limiting your thinking by taking what he said as an insult,ITS the software analergy IM TIRED RIGHT NOW BUT COMMENT IF YOU WANT,
I would be happy to explain why it is true and NOT an insult on behalf of DR De bono.
well i will say breifly what i think, and will answer more questions.
The gg3 formalised thinking and it was sufficient at that time, there have no doubt been great philosaphers since then, but thinking isn't seen as a fundimental subject (only in venezuela) like science, english or maths so how could it progress without government backing?
vinni- you said: "I would be happy to explain why it is true and NOT an insult on behalf of DR De bono."
I would like you to explain why people should not be insulted by an arrogant statement which is not exactly true. Why would he make such controversial statements which would illustrate how little he knows of the wider sphere of non-european/ western mankind or history of thinking for that matter.
you say: "Yes its not an insult because its not directed at anyone neither does it diminish anyones accomplishments."
There! There is the problem! right there when you say it does not diminish anyones accomplishments. I think it does. He suggests that no thinking occurred before or after the GG3 which is a false statement to make. By doing so he confines thinkers to west which we all know was in dark ages before modern thinkers showed up.
See your missing the point,can you name one person since the gg3 who has revolutionised thinking as a skill?
He does not confine thinkers to the west,he says china was way ahead of the west in terms of thinking because they saw the value in random input to generate ideas, then they adopted western thinking,which is more dogmatic.They view new ideas and perceptions as a threat to its logic.
There is no point in me debating with you if you do not "seek" to understand.
Complex thinking is not the same as good thinking,Intelligence is not the same as wisdom.
I suggest you replay this video and listen without judgement and more clarity,he is a very perceptually aware person far greater than you or i,he wouldn't be so arrogant to insult anyones thinking, as for modern thinking,lateral thinking is the most modern form of thinking,if you can refer to any "modern thinkers" which havn't jumped on the lateral thinking band wagon i would be interested to see who?
looking that up on amazon, it doesn't sound so convoluted as that. just a terribly pretentious book that apparently everyone who's read it ended up hating.
because mom not only won in straigh sets but also not loose a Single game in those two sets.But again Mom showed some attitude onfield which was hurt as a person and sport spirit. She didn't shake hands after the game. But any way that's way she live her life. But the way she played today that was superb. I like it
today i am feeling so glad from the day started. You know why?? oh! how you know. Ok, i will tell u that.
In early in the morning there was a tennis match between my Mom and her childhood oponent. Means their rivalry in this sport started at their age of 8.Although my Mom beats her so many times means 90% out of hundred. But todays win is very special for me.
This guys system is absolutely brilliant. I tried it out many years ago and it improved my posibility thinking enormously. Lateral thinking is a must for the creative thinker. Thanks Edward. Nahu
I am currently ready the Six Thinking Hats. The method of thinking described in the book is very simple yet not obvious to our minds. But Dr De Bono has described the aspects of thinking in very simple way. Great stuff !
ios!! yeah
thameanman 2 days ago
So many videos with people promoting different ideas of what "creativity" means.
fabioeoch 1 week ago
the website on the description is not working...
Xzariah 1 month ago
In order for an idea to show "value", does it not have to show an application or use? If your idea is not useful, per se, as having the ability of being used to fuel more thinking that is useful, it must be applicable to the real world. e.g. string theory suggests 11 spatial dimensions (totally useless to us), but it also attempts to explain subatomic particles that we are trying to find. In order to be applicable, they must be compatible with existing convention.
Spurion 2 months ago
excellent video...
baniez1 6 months ago
If only he knew about American Football. I think he could have been a great football coach with that type of thinking. Hear that football coaches...
77774541 9 months ago
This guy is an intellectual powerhouse. A real fantastic human.
caesiume 10 months ago
Google search think-strategically-now for another great ebook. It takes a holistic approach to thinking Strategically rather than lateral.. I highly suggest
xtensiv 1 year ago
Wonder what this guy thinks of Lada Gaga?
DancingChakra 1 year ago
@DancingChakra so do i! its interesting actually. ive always thought of her as attention-seeking and not creative at all.
musicislove25 1 year ago
@DancingChakra
She is different for the sake of being different.
Serpent541 2 weeks ago
Creativity means 'something from nothing' as in 'The creation'.
Original thought.
Quiltinguk 1 year ago
watch this with transcribe audio on and you get some real creative thinking going on
BigOldToe 1 year ago
creativity is largely the ability to respond. the ability to appreciate what constitutes creativity is dictated by the expectations of the observer. a child may not be able to respond directly to his/her circumstances but may find alternative possibilities. the question is whether we can discern their response. so creativity is really relationship of doer and beholder. making a loud noise may get our attention because we're too busy to read the subtler signals thus stiffling other expressions.
elephantinpajamas 1 year ago
IF creative thinking is a skill that can be learned, then why has Mr. de Bono produced nothing else besides books about it? If creative thinking was learnable, as he says, wouldn't he himself also be an artist, engineer or inventor?
Invesigator 1 year ago 2
One of the most important points he makes is how little education has been applied to "learning the skill" of creative thought. Most people think you are creative or not (eg: you have blue eyes or not). But creativity is a SKILL we all have the ability & responsibility to develop. Especially in this day and age, people NEED to learn these skills. Just this morning I was introduced to a great website: therightbraininitiative financially supported through the Gate Foundation. YAY!
lynlasneski 1 year ago
I must say I agree with Mr. de Bon0- and from Playright to mataphysician, from parapsychologist If you go to my you tube you will see how out of the box I think. Its never called lateral thinking though it most certainly is, its called crazy by those dull in the box brains.lol Thank you for the approval. I am an artist too and am amazed at how innovative this new generation is
moesez1 1 year ago
Comment removed
LeroyRifkin 1 year ago
creative thinking and lateral thinkging has been going on for millennium.pathetic current generation need to listen to a doctor i how to think instead of him helping third world people with their health problems and reduce child motality. waste of medical education.
vjpillay 1 year ago
they never developet glass, and thosfor no reading glassis
roosterbasher 1 year ago
This actually kind of sad. There are much better places and people to go to learn about creativity. I guess if you are a non-creative person looking for non-creative person to teach you to be creativity, Edward is your man.
If you are creative, NO MORE SECOND HAND ART or Natalie Goldberg stuff would be a better place to start if you are box person who suspects there is universe outside the box.
eotto2001 1 year ago
@eotto2001 maybe read one of his books. Thinking tools is a good one.
the book will be alot clearer than a 4 min video, so don't make up your mind just yet.
dasocks 1 year ago
@dasocks I'll try but first impressions are about a man who lacks intellectual fluidity. In the 60s they would have called him a square.
eotto2001 1 year ago
@eotto2001 ok give it a go.
btw what does intellectual fluidity mean?
dasocks 1 year ago
@dasocks There is a danger in ones intellectual life is to make pronouncement and assertions that are the absolute truth. Doing so will tend to lock one into one point of view. If creatively you are exploring an idea or a theme, you need to do that for a time, but it is not a good thing to stay there. I can understand Edward's point of view in a post modern world, creatively you want to keep your options and choices open. When you say this is The Truth, it locks up your creativity.
eotto2001 1 year ago
@eotto2001 yer. well its all down to what you choose to learn from him. He knows alot of stuff. I particularly liked his explanation of the "clash system" maybe that is on you tube somewhere
dasocks 1 year ago
@eotto2001 Hello. I feel de Bono touches on important elements of thinking that can be applied to creativity. Some of these "tibits" have inspired me instantly. I'm glad to hear what he has to say. Apparently he wants to teach people how to be creative. As a creative person, I think he speaks well. He doesn't always try to sell something. Buried in this video is de Bono speaking in a timeless manner. Not all the ideas are new but as "they" say: some things are worth repeating.
thPhilepII 1 year ago
i love his necktie.
sk8young 1 year ago
A lot of people who listen to Edward de Bono speak truly believe that "it's already been done" or that they "already do that". After several years as a member of a Thinking Club dedicated to the actual practice and application of de Bono's thinking principles, I can assure you that "it has not" and "they do not". Just grab a copy of "de Bono's Thinking Course", read through it, do the exercises, and you'll see for yourself. You'll get real-world results by applying his methods on a daily basis.
modernfreestyle 1 year ago
Much of the tools he refers to, had been used by scientists, philosophers, and creative thinkers before and after the Greeks throughout the history. Do we believe him or the evidence that we see before us. Pick up a mathematics book, pick up a physics book, the theories of social and political science. How does any of this constitute the state of standstill?
approveall 1 year ago 2
if this guy were really an expert on creativity he'd have made a more interesting and creative presentation
HIGRecords 1 year ago
did he died?
bhamshotta786 1 year ago
He who thinks outside the box, dwells in a bubble contemplating the box.
superfine74 2 years ago 5
@superfine74 wrong becuz creativity reaches infinity, its not being captured by something whatsoever.
squirtleenblastoise 1 year ago
@superfine74 i dont get it
classicdinner 1 year ago
@superfine74 Nope, not me!! :D
I passed that bubble, I am Insane ;)
Ulrna 1 year ago
@superfine74 sounds good but... the main idea tends to be progress and is not to be stuck in a box nor a bubble. etc.
thPhilepII 1 year ago
anybody know of any good introductory logic books that would be complementary with lateral thinking?
Floorsnarl 2 years ago
I think what matters here is not only the logic, but doing exercises and trying to solve them.
So i would recommend you to search for a exercise book not only a theory book. Hope it helped my answer
adrianalanis20000 2 years ago
Fuzzy Thinking by Bart Kosko is a good alternative way of looking at logic. Try lots of different approaches.
malcolmbryant 1 year ago
This is quite interesting and important.
numberonesurvivor75 2 years ago
Thank you for loading this. I have heard of him. But it is great to hear his wisdom. I like the twists he places on modern words and expectations.
sankow2 2 years ago
does it mean postmodern art and music aren't creative b/c they have no "value"? Seems like we can't ever get away from the arbitrary on this issue.
bananian 2 years ago
If your in gmit give this a thumbs up
SuperDutchGold 2 years ago
Debono does make grand sweeping claims that seem too farfetched but I think much of what he say's is important. He claims that philosophy is basically about word games, well, maybe a lot of it, no doubt. I think our major problem is that we allow the primitive (esp sexual) brain to get the march on our better selves. I should think that much of what Debono recommends could well remedy that problem. The key issue is empathy, he has an equivalent acronym but not that original surely.
Xenostrobe 2 years ago
I really enjoy his speaking style. Old school, to the point and very well spoken. No fake hype, no loud backslapping campy speaking style (though I enjoy that style also). I could listen to him for hours. He's serious because he is passionate and an excellent communicator and educator. Mr de Bono is great! Easy to take notes to. He is very cool. I'd pay money to hear him in person. I just stumbled onto this and find his concepts very interesting. Mr. de Bono Thank you for posting this.
drumsonly2002 2 years ago
Comment removed
musicislove25 2 years ago
Why? because most people can't even define creativity. Most people believe that only the exceptions among us are creative. Most people don't MAKE music because they believe they CAN'T because they aren't creative.
RoyalMusicmaker 2 years ago
Hey if you want to take your mind into a new direction, take a look at kerou(.)net
He's a new cartoonist that tends toward the intellectual. I think he'll be big in a few years time see it before its all old news. I read it and it sets your brain going.
you2begin 2 years ago
yeah ill take a look.
vinniedurrant 2 years ago
1st 2 are easy.
The 3rd, here's an answer, even though it's not your answer. He kills the guard. If he goes home, he grabs a gun and shoots the guard.
Remember, this is about lateral thinking. It seems hypocritical to not accept a plausible answer just because it's not the one you were thinking.
pr0reality 2 years ago
Since computers weren't around for 2,000 years, did we have to think of the human brain as an Abacus?
Petedog32 2 years ago
Why aren't we creative? Step out of Plato's Cave, eh? Oh wait, WE CAN'T.
Please pass the desdemona and pull up a magnifying glass.
OURPLAYLISTSSSS 2 years ago
- why start the thinking story from the west?
- why did the Greeks produce the GG3 and then go impotent for 2400 years? The chinese as far as I am aware continued to contribute in many ways or am I wrong?
- To suggest that man has stopped thinking for 2400 years is an insult to humanity, isn't it? or perhaps you are referring to west, in which case you may be correct in assuming that no thinking did occur until the 16th or 17th century. Oh! Perhaps you meant before "lateral thinking".
talk2u2c 2 years ago
I have read his book many years ago. Interesting I must admit! However, I did not have the pleasure of listening to him to date.
My only problem with Dr De Bono is the bold statements he makes.
"The original software was designed 2400 years ago by the GG3. We have done nothing for thinking since then". Questions:
talk2u2c 2 years ago
Its true though,your already limiting your thinking by taking what he said as an insult,ITS the software analergy IM TIRED RIGHT NOW BUT COMMENT IF YOU WANT,
I would be happy to explain why it is true and NOT an insult on behalf of DR De bono.
vinniedurrant 2 years ago
Vinniedurrant- Why is it true? I am all ears.
talk2u2c 2 years ago
well i will say breifly what i think, and will answer more questions.
The gg3 formalised thinking and it was sufficient at that time, there have no doubt been great philosaphers since then, but thinking isn't seen as a fundimental subject (only in venezuela) like science, english or maths so how could it progress without government backing?
vinniedurrant 2 years ago
vinni- you said: "I would be happy to explain why it is true and NOT an insult on behalf of DR De bono."
I would like you to explain why people should not be insulted by an arrogant statement which is not exactly true. Why would he make such controversial statements which would illustrate how little he knows of the wider sphere of non-european/ western mankind or history of thinking for that matter.
talk2u2c 2 years ago
Yes its not an insult because its not directed at anyone neither does it diminish anyones acomplishments.
And i do believe its a misunderstanding,not an insult but a "PROVACATION" knowing him.
You may like him or dislike him but if your understanding you will see the powerfull potential of lateral thinking.
We attack instead of construct. we have done virtually nothing for thinking because were so highly esteemed in our critical search for the truth.
vinniedurrant 2 years ago
you say: "Yes its not an insult because its not directed at anyone neither does it diminish anyones accomplishments."
There! There is the problem! right there when you say it does not diminish anyones accomplishments. I think it does. He suggests that no thinking occurred before or after the GG3 which is a false statement to make. By doing so he confines thinkers to west which we all know was in dark ages before modern thinkers showed up.
talk2u2c 2 years ago 2
See your missing the point,can you name one person since the gg3 who has revolutionised thinking as a skill?
He does not confine thinkers to the west,he says china was way ahead of the west in terms of thinking because they saw the value in random input to generate ideas, then they adopted western thinking,which is more dogmatic.They view new ideas and perceptions as a threat to its logic.
There is no point in me debating with you if you do not "seek" to understand.
vinniedurrant 2 years ago
OK! I need you to define what you mean by thinking.
talk2u2c 2 years ago
greek gang of 3.if im not mistaken.
Socrates, Plato and Aristotle.
nouiella 2 years ago
Complex thinking is not the same as good thinking,Intelligence is not the same as wisdom.
I suggest you replay this video and listen without judgement and more clarity,he is a very perceptually aware person far greater than you or i,he wouldn't be so arrogant to insult anyones thinking, as for modern thinking,lateral thinking is the most modern form of thinking,if you can refer to any "modern thinkers" which havn't jumped on the lateral thinking band wagon i would be interested to see who?
vinniedurrant 2 years ago 8
If you cant, then how can you say we've done anything for thinking since?
vinniedurrant 2 years ago
"Intelligence is not the same as wisdom."
Very, very true.
JarOfBuckeyes 2 years ago
He is a PO!
the well-wisher
sarchawm 2 years ago
Edward de Bono is basically a cultist. Read H+: the new religion. It's an attack on sanity. The man is messed up.
darklordsma 3 years ago
looking that up on amazon, it doesn't sound so convoluted as that. just a terribly pretentious book that apparently everyone who's read it ended up hating.
mbdillon 2 years ago
i'm not creative
r0galik 3 years ago
thanks to EDWARD DE BONO the master of this art of creative thinking
abhis19831 3 years ago 3
because mom not only won in straigh sets but also not loose a Single game in those two sets.But again Mom showed some attitude onfield which was hurt as a person and sport spirit. She didn't shake hands after the game. But any way that's way she live her life. But the way she played today that was superb. I like it
abhis19831 3 years ago
today i am feeling so glad from the day started. You know why?? oh! how you know. Ok, i will tell u that.
In early in the morning there was a tennis match between my Mom and her childhood oponent. Means their rivalry in this sport started at their age of 8.Although my Mom beats her so many times means 90% out of hundred. But todays win is very special for me.
abhis19831 3 years ago
is that creativity?
supergirlsrule 3 years ago
de rubbish!!
andygibson 3 years ago
Duh.
Casanuda 3 years ago
edward de bono vs confusion/no sense.
misterfisherman 3 years ago
hehe they hate my theory.hmmm yes
misterfisherman 3 years ago
This guys system is absolutely brilliant. I tried it out many years ago and it improved my posibility thinking enormously. Lateral thinking is a must for the creative thinker. Thanks Edward. Nahu
Nahulanham 3 years ago
have you left out anything?
misterfisherman 3 years ago
wow, IM not smart at all.
rsattiq 3 years ago
thank u it is very good tube
MYKSA007 4 years ago 2
I am currently ready the Six Thinking Hats. The method of thinking described in the book is very simple yet not obvious to our minds. But Dr De Bono has described the aspects of thinking in very simple way. Great stuff !
nitinsj 4 years ago 3
is there another author superior to edward de bono? hhmmmm ??-?
misterfisherman 4 years ago
What was Dr. De bono thinking when he chose that tie that faithful morning?
kvbrock82 4 years ago
to get you thinking of alternative crititisms.
toptop90 4 years ago
I like Chicken
nehow123 4 years ago
,,,and what better person to respond to such a question on these matters concerning these subjects ? hahaha,,,ME !
CreativeCritisizm 4 years ago
me 2
branchedout63 3 years ago
I have a couple of this guy's books. One title is THE 6 THINKING HATS. And that is a very nice tie. --No Joke. A nice tie makes all the difference.
LiptonGuy 4 years ago
"Be sure to check out more from Doctor de Bono and solve his three creative challenges at poodotcom". Make sure to blwjb me first.
khmaz 4 years ago
Just wish more of your teachings come to the tube. Thanks for this one
jodesai 4 years ago