Most atheists don't have a clue about what they're talking about,they just parrot, what others with an atheistic agenda have written, without ever stopping to use their brain.They accuse Creationists of all kinds of things,curse and call names,but in the end it will be the atheists who will be in for the biggest surprise of their existance.
Start at the beginning.The first LAW of thermodynamics states that energy cannot be created or destroyed.Since science has proven the universe had a beginning,someone or something had to add this energy from outside our universe.Since the creation cannot be greater than it's Creator,this should show that God is more plausible than everything creating itself from nothing.God is the only first cause without a cause.The same applies to DNA,which is nothing more than immaterial INFO. cont.
Information always,always comes from intelligence,this is what we observe in every case(real science).Matter cannot add new information,info can be scrambled or lose existing info through mutations,but new info cannot be added unless someone or something intelligent is responsible.
are you casting from inside a friggin' barn??? your so well spoken and accurate i have no idea why people are arguing with you. But seriously you need to start paying attention in school and spend less time thinking about your next factually correct podcast.
In the beginning, we were all fish. Okay? Swimming around in the water. And then one day a couple of fish had a retard baby, and the retard baby was different, so it got to live. So Retard Fish goes on to make more retard babies, and then one day, a retard baby fish crawled out of the ocean with its mutant fish hands...
and it had butt sex with a squirrel or something and made this. Retard frog-sqirrel, and then *that* had a retard baby which was a... monkey-fish-frog... And then this monkey-fish-frog had butt sex with that monkey, and that monkey had a mutant retard baby that screwed another monkey... and that made you!
methinks it's about time this kid threw the shovel out of the hole he's digging for himself with his incredibly inarticulate and ill informed half of the 'debate'. Fish, barrels and shooting spring to mind.
as far as i know...people dont experiance god doing these miricles...hmmm sounds a little funny to me. well who made god? where did he come from? hmmm the aruments are the same but there is no proof in ANYTHING plus religion is delusion. o yeah and frogs have lungs and gills :) there are animals that still have both. i know...it was all aliens. i believe aliens before that bible crap.
Have you ever tried to give evolution an honest chance? Ask yourself and be honest (you're only lying to yourself). If you want to be the best you can be, find someone who believes in evolution and who's in the know, and try to really hear them out. You have so obviously been brainwashed by your parents. They've done you a great disservice!
you see what your doing here is believing something you what to be true can be created out nothing(God coming out of nothing)while something you do n't want to be true(big bang,orgin of life) can't be. So which is it?
Not even close. There are significant morphological differences between chimps and Lucy. Nebraska Man was shown to be a fraud by the scientific community, pointing to the fact that science is self-correcting.
The information about Neandertals comes from over 500 individuals, all showing the same basic physical characteristics regardless of age.
It's bad that Kent Hovind is in jail for tax fraud? What, do you think that he shouldn't be punished for it?
Hahahaha, the old pig fraud excuse. People like you always claim it's a pig in these arguments from everything from human evolution to bloody dinosaurs.
You're entire argument is comprised of having breathing problems, being a spastic 11 year old, and telling people to "think about it." The fact that an organism such as yourself exists is proof positive there is no god.
Cola cans and cars are not reproducing living things so evolution cannot possibly apply to them. You and I on the other hand are living things. Are you that daft that you can't tell the difference?
You're talking to teh kid who not only listens to idiots like Hovind and Cameron, but used the banana argument. I swear, this kid is a stone's throw away from using the hilarious "peanut butter" argument.
And mammals didn't evolve from birds. That was a different evolutionary line.
And who "proved" these fossils were frauds? SCIENTISTS. Nebraska man, etc. are not considered to be evidence of evolution in any way. (And BTW, no scientist argues that Lucy and Neanderthal Man were anything other than ancient hominids.)
Dude. You SERIOUSLY need to take a biology class. Amoebas reproduce by binary fission. That means that ONE amoeba splits and becomes TWO identical amoebas, *without sex*. And amoebas weren't the first thing to evolve anyway.
Fish called "crossopterygians" developed lungs while they were still fish (allowing them to survive dry spells). They were the ancestors of modern amphibians.
Yes, but you've clearly demonstrated that you know nothing about biology or evolution. Please, you're young. Get a modern biology textbook and *read it*. Not only does evolution "make sense" when you know the facts, it becomes amazingly clear that EVOLUTION IS A FACT.
Did you by any chance finish watching that debate? Ray and Kirk were slaughtered. He makes a few mistakes. First, evolution isn't blind chance. Second, everything doesn't need a creator. THird, and possibly the biggest, we can prove that thing had a designer, and know how s/he did it. WE can look up the records, go down to where the soda can was made, find out the process, and figure out pretty much everything about it. We can't do any of these things with God.
Is there time in heaven? If no, then heaven is touching all points in time at once and God has no time. However, that also means that everyone who will ever be in heaven is in heaven. At the moment of creation everyone was there. So unless you and me are already in heaven or hell, heaven must have time. If that's true, heaven must have a begining. That means god had a beginning.
You say it's stupid to believe in evolution.Well I say it's stupid to believe in a bunch of myths that come from the middle east.MIDDLE EAST+MYTHS=THE BIBLE
Noah's flood story is FALSE! the person who wrote the bible flood myth copied it from The Epic of Gilgamesh wich is of Sumerian and Babylonian origin!
So where is your proof of god?there are millions and millions of gods.Show me real solid PROOF your god exists!and then show me real solid PROOF the millions of other gods don't!
Some people say they see an ark,others say they don't see nothing I see nothing.Now show me PROOF of god and show me PROOF the MILLIONS of other gods don't exist!
well...for me im sure youve heard of getting saved. So i felt God before. and if you can prove all of the stuff in the bible is true, then that proves God is real.
If you can prove all the stuff in the bible is true,then that proves god is real.Then prove what the bible has-demons dragons wizards unicorns angels giants,psychics,talking animals,people who fly,magic tree,900yr old people,resurrections,a person who lives inside of a whale.And hundreds of other myths.
a lot of things cant be proven...but are true. it all takes faith. thats why i think every thing the bible says is true. things have been proven true in the bible. and what about feeling God? to me thats peoof.
a lot of things can't be proven...but are true.WOW! you are really delusional.What you are saying is that talking animals in the bible can't be proven but it's real all you need is faith.The hindus have flying castles and flying chariots in their books.If we follow your argument,then the hindu books are also real even though you can't prove flying chariots,all the hidus need is faith,and that makes flying chariots real.The hindus also claim to feel their gods.
ive never heard of any of that but ok.What if you had the same evidence i have about feeling God? some things take faith.
2nd corintions 5:7 "We live by Faith, Not by Sight." Their are some things logic doesnt prove. and thats what takes faith. feeling God is is more than enough proof for me.
You say feeling god is enough proof he exists.Well what about the other religious people who claim to feel their god/gods like the hindus muslims druids viracochans anciant egyptian worshipers pagans native american tribes african tribes and thousands of other religious people.
Do we have free will? Did God create us? Does he know everything? That means we don't have free will. God created everything and he knew every possible outcome for every possible creation. He could control the conditions for everything. That means since he knew every possible outcome, he chose ours and chose our since. Everything he do is therefore because of his pans, and we have no choice ourselves.
we still have free will. just because he knows what were going to do doesnt mean that we dont have free will. ok your kid goes out and you know hes going to go out and graffiti a wall or something... but you dont stop it.and he does it. he still has the free will to do it...see what im saying?
Yes. However, since God knew every possible outcome for creation before he createdd and can manipulate even the most specific conditions, he seected our particular outcome. He chose our fate. That's what makes us not have free will. He he just knew fine. But since he chose and made, we don't, according to you.
You demand proof for 0 point energy (or the bit just after the big bang/before) yet, you don't demand proof for an omniopent being just going "poof, there's the world"
FUrthermore, your logic says God must have a designer.
Kent Hovind is an idiot who knows nothing about science. I've watched his video; pathetic and sad. Most of his stuff I can debunk from memory. The rest takes me about 2 hours or less of research. I'm debating his son, and he's not much better. Although I must say, he's much more polite. And the lack of a southern accent is a plus.
But that goes against your logic that everything needs a creator. Logic must be tossed out when you get to your God. That shows you're looking for a quick answer.
Is God possible? Yes. However, there are an infinite number of possibilities as to what might be there.
How do you know this? Show us real solid proof.Your GOD WAS NOT CREATED argument is silly! Because the same thing can be said about the thousands and thousands of other mythological gods.You are talking like if the judeo-christian God is real,but you have not provided any kind of evidence of his existence.
YOur "proof" of a designer easily falls apart with logic. Life is nothing like that. Those things don't mutate, reproduce, and aren't subject to natural selection. YOu can't compare them to life.
Humans, with out brains capable of design, have a hard time imagining things without a designer.
The fraud you were thinking of was Piltdown man. YOu're right. A scientists did lie about it. Scientists were skeptical about it, as it didn't fit with the other fossil evidence. However, the frauds and mistakes are easily outweighed by the genuine fossils.
Kid, you know nothing. YOu start off with teh big bang. Not only is that not evolution, you don't even know about it. It was a singularity. It was all the matter in the universe. It wasn't nothing. It was everything.
The matter doesn't have to "know" how to come together. They come together through attraction.
YOu move on to abiogenesis (not evolution, and your idea is wrong entirely)
As for lungs vs gills, look up the lungfish.
YOu don't know anything about what you're talking about.
Howdy. Your video is sad to see: you have no knowledge of the subjects you are pretending to debate about, and I cannot imagine why you would subject yourself to such humiliation.
By the way, one does not believe in evolution: evolution is an observed fact and not something one "believes" in.
Actually, it isn't. And those are just the species. If you want to count total transitional fossil specimens you get figures well into the hundred thousands.
You mean AiG? Or do you mean the actual scientists who didn't say it was a chimp, but that it just wasn't a direct ancestor, which was the general opinion all along. Lucy is quite clearly not a chimp. She's not a direct ancestor, but was closely related to our direct ancestor and shows a clear indication of human evolution. Watch the video I sent you. You say we don't listen to Kent Hovind, but you didn't watch my video. That makes you a hypocrite.
Nabraska man was a mistake. Pigs and humans have similar teeth. And scientists didn't reconstruct the entire body from a tooth. That was a newspaper, and scientists were constantly complaining about it because it owuld be inaccurate.
Neanderthals aren't old men with arthritis. 3-600 had RICKETs, and they had a brow ridge (also found on childrem so old age isn't an explanation), 50% thicker bones, outward jaw, larger brain, and many other non-human features.
We can see how the can was made; or the car. We can find out who made it. We can understand and see where. YOu can't understand how God made the universe, there's no proof of it, you can't visit his universe factory.
Further more, none of that had ANYTHING to do with evolution.
look at the banana its perfect it fits perfectly in your hand plus it has a tab to open it thats not natural selection its God and this thing is proof of evolution debunked
The bannana? YOu're kidding me. Okay. The banana you know today is the product of thousands of years of selective cross polenation by humans. We selectively bred them. Look at a wild banana; a real banana. They have weird shapes and have seeds in them. They don't have tabs at the top. Bananas we eat aren't even grown naturally. This argument was debunked easily, and shows no research on Kirk's part.
i like how you mention you did "research" in this video. seriously, i can't believe you fell for that ray comfort argument. last i heard, they weren't even using that one since it's so insane. the bananas you know of have been cultivated throughout the years. look at a wild banana and try to repeat this bs.
you are completely confusing, for one youre bias, when nature is challenged it has ways of changing itself, you need to study energy a lot more.
Deenahmeeteh 2 years ago
Most atheists don't have a clue about what they're talking about,they just parrot, what others with an atheistic agenda have written, without ever stopping to use their brain.They accuse Creationists of all kinds of things,curse and call names,but in the end it will be the atheists who will be in for the biggest surprise of their existance.
CBALLEN 3 years ago
Start at the beginning.The first LAW of thermodynamics states that energy cannot be created or destroyed.Since science has proven the universe had a beginning,someone or something had to add this energy from outside our universe.Since the creation cannot be greater than it's Creator,this should show that God is more plausible than everything creating itself from nothing.God is the only first cause without a cause.The same applies to DNA,which is nothing more than immaterial INFO. cont.
CBALLEN 3 years ago
Information always,always comes from intelligence,this is what we observe in every case(real science).Matter cannot add new information,info can be scrambled or lose existing info through mutations,but new info cannot be added unless someone or something intelligent is responsible.
CBALLEN 3 years ago
If this is a practical joke, you are the funniest person of all time. ever.
If not...your proof that god doesn't exist. No loving god would ever create such a pathetic retard.
p.s. Do you really believe coke cans grow on trees?
achilles264 4 years ago
join the army.
necronougat 4 years ago 4
are you casting from inside a friggin' barn??? your so well spoken and accurate i have no idea why people are arguing with you. But seriously you need to start paying attention in school and spend less time thinking about your next factually correct podcast.
capitancarpet 4 years ago
In the beginning, we were all fish. Okay? Swimming around in the water. And then one day a couple of fish had a retard baby, and the retard baby was different, so it got to live. So Retard Fish goes on to make more retard babies, and then one day, a retard baby fish crawled out of the ocean with its mutant fish hands...
MissLeigh78 4 years ago
and it had butt sex with a squirrel or something and made this. Retard frog-sqirrel, and then *that* had a retard baby which was a... monkey-fish-frog... And then this monkey-fish-frog had butt sex with that monkey, and that monkey had a mutant retard baby that screwed another monkey... and that made you!
MissLeigh78 4 years ago
o ya that sounds scientific NO that soundsw like a myth to me
soldierofGod40 4 years ago
thanks a joke from south park my friend
grizzedram 4 years ago
A soup!
MissLeigh78 4 years ago
hey kid i got some videos for yout to watch.go to my profile and go to my playlists and watch the "Ancient Belief Systems" playlist.
HabeasCorpus420 4 years ago
methinks it's about time this kid threw the shovel out of the hole he's digging for himself with his incredibly inarticulate and ill informed half of the 'debate'. Fish, barrels and shooting spring to mind.
falchion49 4 years ago
You SAW God create the universe? Hats off my friend, that is impressive.
Hellraiser717 4 years ago
as far as i know...people dont experiance god doing these miricles...hmmm sounds a little funny to me. well who made god? where did he come from? hmmm the aruments are the same but there is no proof in ANYTHING plus religion is delusion. o yeah and frogs have lungs and gills :) there are animals that still have both. i know...it was all aliens. i believe aliens before that bible crap.
sweetsweetcandy867 4 years ago
Have you ever tried to give evolution an honest chance? Ask yourself and be honest (you're only lying to yourself). If you want to be the best you can be, find someone who believes in evolution and who's in the know, and try to really hear them out. You have so obviously been brainwashed by your parents. They've done you a great disservice!
DogBoots77 4 years ago
i took a month to consider it and I seriously still doubt it
soldierofGod40 4 years ago
you see what your doing here is believing something you what to be true can be created out nothing(God coming out of nothing)while something you do n't want to be true(big bang,orgin of life) can't be. So which is it?
Hans207 4 years ago
One criticism on style.
Get some sort of stand for your camera.
MrFungus420 4 years ago
"Lucy was a chimpazee."
Not even close. There are significant morphological differences between chimps and Lucy. Nebraska Man was shown to be a fraud by the scientific community, pointing to the fact that science is self-correcting.
The information about Neandertals comes from over 500 individuals, all showing the same basic physical characteristics regardless of age.
It's bad that Kent Hovind is in jail for tax fraud? What, do you think that he shouldn't be punished for it?
MrFungus420 4 years ago
"There has never...anybody has never seen nothing come from nowhere."
Wow, a quadruple negative...
"Law of Energy"? What "Law of Energy"?
Point on the fish. Have you ever heard of the mudskipper or the lungfish? Both are fish that can live outside of water for a period of time.
MrFungus420 4 years ago
Hahahaha, the old pig fraud excuse. People like you always claim it's a pig in these arguments from everything from human evolution to bloody dinosaurs.
whydoyouwanttoknow 4 years ago
What's this law of energy?
whydoyouwanttoknow 4 years ago
you are still very ignorant.
dfgggg 4 years ago
monkeys didn't evolve from birds their were others thing you were wrong about but i just chose that statement
shotyboy 4 years ago
he's still using kent hovind arguements!!!
dfgggg 4 years ago
The logic jump from 'big bang might not be true' to... A big smart ghost made it.
torin006 4 years ago
You're entire argument is comprised of having breathing problems, being a spastic 11 year old, and telling people to "think about it." The fact that an organism such as yourself exists is proof positive there is no god.
drsloppo 4 years ago
Cola cans and cars are not reproducing living things so evolution cannot possibly apply to them. You and I on the other hand are living things. Are you that daft that you can't tell the difference?
Bueller007 4 years ago
You're talking to teh kid who not only listens to idiots like Hovind and Cameron, but used the banana argument. I swear, this kid is a stone's throw away from using the hilarious "peanut butter" argument.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
And mammals didn't evolve from birds. That was a different evolutionary line.
And who "proved" these fossils were frauds? SCIENTISTS. Nebraska man, etc. are not considered to be evidence of evolution in any way. (And BTW, no scientist argues that Lucy and Neanderthal Man were anything other than ancient hominids.)
Bueller007 4 years ago
Dude. You SERIOUSLY need to take a biology class. Amoebas reproduce by binary fission. That means that ONE amoeba splits and becomes TWO identical amoebas, *without sex*. And amoebas weren't the first thing to evolve anyway.
Fish called "crossopterygians" developed lungs while they were still fish (allowing them to survive dry spells). They were the ancestors of modern amphibians.
Bueller007 4 years ago
that still sounds like total bs
endiscomi1 4 years ago
Yes, but you've clearly demonstrated that you know nothing about biology or evolution. Please, you're young. Get a modern biology textbook and *read it*. Not only does evolution "make sense" when you know the facts, it becomes amazingly clear that EVOLUTION IS A FACT.
Bueller007 4 years ago
Nothing came from nothing except when god did it? Is that a fact..?
norwegianbuddha 4 years ago
look at the cola can it can not be made by accident watch?v=BGy7jRi2-uY
endiscomi1 4 years ago
Did you by any chance finish watching that debate? Ray and Kirk were slaughtered. He makes a few mistakes. First, evolution isn't blind chance. Second, everything doesn't need a creator. THird, and possibly the biggest, we can prove that thing had a designer, and know how s/he did it. WE can look up the records, go down to where the soda can was made, find out the process, and figure out pretty much everything about it. We can't do any of these things with God.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
yeah we can. Moses asked God who he was and God said "I am." you know why he said that? he is... he wasnt created...hes always been here.
LoserLummus 4 years ago
Is there time in heaven? If no, then heaven is touching all points in time at once and God has no time. However, that also means that everyone who will ever be in heaven is in heaven. At the moment of creation everyone was there. So unless you and me are already in heaven or hell, heaven must have time. If that's true, heaven must have a begining. That means god had a beginning.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
You say it's stupid to believe in evolution.Well I say it's stupid to believe in a bunch of myths that come from the middle east.MIDDLE EAST+MYTHS=THE BIBLE
Octans28 4 years ago
how do you know that its a bunch of myths?their are things in the Bible that are true. like the flood for example.
LoserLummus 4 years ago
Noah's flood story is FALSE! the person who wrote the bible flood myth copied it from The Epic of Gilgamesh wich is of Sumerian and Babylonian origin!
Octans28 4 years ago
ok then why is there evidence that supports it?
LoserLummus 4 years ago
Extraordinary claims require Extraordinary evidence!there is no evidence of god or your flood.Try again LOSER!
Octans28 4 years ago
fossils on top of mountains, pictures of the ark on mt arat where the bible said it would be. and there is evidence of God too.
LoserLummus 4 years ago
Mt.ararat pictures don't show anything sorry! And there is no evidence of god sorry again!
Octans28 4 years ago
So where is your proof of god?there are millions and millions of gods.Show me real solid PROOF your god exists!and then show me real solid PROOF the millions of other gods don't!
Octans28 4 years ago
the pictures do show something. look again. lets see he created the earth in 6 days. to me thats real solid evidence.
LoserLummus 4 years ago
Some people say they see an ark,others say they don't see nothing I see nothing.Now show me PROOF of god and show me PROOF the MILLIONS of other gods don't exist!
Octans28 4 years ago
well...for me im sure youve heard of getting saved. So i felt God before. and if you can prove all of the stuff in the bible is true, then that proves God is real.
LoserLummus 4 years ago
If you can prove all the stuff in the bible is true,then that proves god is real.Then prove what the bible has-demons dragons wizards unicorns angels giants,psychics,talking animals,people who fly,magic tree,900yr old people,resurrections,a person who lives inside of a whale.And hundreds of other myths.
Octans28 4 years ago
a lot of things cant be proven...but are true. it all takes faith. thats why i think every thing the bible says is true. things have been proven true in the bible. and what about feeling God? to me thats peoof.
LoserLummus 4 years ago
a lot of things can't be proven...but are true.WOW! you are really delusional.What you are saying is that talking animals in the bible can't be proven but it's real all you need is faith.The hindus have flying castles and flying chariots in their books.If we follow your argument,then the hindu books are also real even though you can't prove flying chariots,all the hidus need is faith,and that makes flying chariots real.The hindus also claim to feel their gods.
Octans28 4 years ago
ive never heard of any of that but ok.What if you had the same evidence i have about feeling God? some things take faith.
2nd corintions 5:7 "We live by Faith, Not by Sight." Their are some things logic doesnt prove. and thats what takes faith. feeling God is is more than enough proof for me.
LoserLummus 4 years ago
You say feeling god is enough proof he exists.Well what about the other religious people who claim to feel their god/gods like the hindus muslims druids viracochans anciant egyptian worshipers pagans native american tribes african tribes and thousands of other religious people.
Octans28 4 years ago
Do we have free will? Did God create us? Does he know everything? That means we don't have free will. God created everything and he knew every possible outcome for every possible creation. He could control the conditions for everything. That means since he knew every possible outcome, he chose ours and chose our since. Everything he do is therefore because of his pans, and we have no choice ourselves.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
we still have free will. just because he knows what were going to do doesnt mean that we dont have free will. ok your kid goes out and you know hes going to go out and graffiti a wall or something... but you dont stop it.and he does it. he still has the free will to do it...see what im saying?
LoserLummus 4 years ago
Yes. However, since God knew every possible outcome for creation before he createdd and can manipulate even the most specific conditions, he seected our particular outcome. He chose our fate. That's what makes us not have free will. He he just knew fine. But since he chose and made, we don't, according to you.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
You demand proof for 0 point energy (or the bit just after the big bang/before) yet, you don't demand proof for an omniopent being just going "poof, there's the world"
Remember, lack of proof isn't a proof itself.
Sarge790 4 years ago
Praise satan children! Jesus is weak and the bible is full of lies!
comradejim 4 years ago
umm.. anyway.. duh.. by the way.. umm..
norwegianbuddha 4 years ago
Here come kent hovind arguments. . .
erchdvd 4 years ago
FUrthermore, your logic says God must have a designer.
Kent Hovind is an idiot who knows nothing about science. I've watched his video; pathetic and sad. Most of his stuff I can debunk from memory. The rest takes me about 2 hours or less of research. I'm debating his son, and he's not much better. Although I must say, he's much more polite. And the lack of a southern accent is a plus.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
GOD WAS NOT CREATED he has always been here
endiscomi1 4 years ago
But that goes against your logic that everything needs a creator. Logic must be tossed out when you get to your God. That shows you're looking for a quick answer.
Is God possible? Yes. However, there are an infinite number of possibilities as to what might be there.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
How do you know this? Show us real solid proof.Your GOD WAS NOT CREATED argument is silly! Because the same thing can be said about the thousands and thousands of other mythological gods.You are talking like if the judeo-christian God is real,but you have not provided any kind of evidence of his existence.
Octans28 4 years ago
YOur "proof" of a designer easily falls apart with logic. Life is nothing like that. Those things don't mutate, reproduce, and aren't subject to natural selection. YOu can't compare them to life.
Humans, with out brains capable of design, have a hard time imagining things without a designer.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
The fraud you were thinking of was Piltdown man. YOu're right. A scientists did lie about it. Scientists were skeptical about it, as it didn't fit with the other fossil evidence. However, the frauds and mistakes are easily outweighed by the genuine fossils.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
lol the way of the masters vs. rrs debate was a total failure
the creationists failed to provide scientific evidence as they said they could
humanforpresident 4 years ago
op i beleive that suuuuuure
endiscomi1 4 years ago
Did you watch the debate? They got slaughtered. I've got it in my favs. It's just too funny to watch.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
Kid, you know nothing. YOu start off with teh big bang. Not only is that not evolution, you don't even know about it. It was a singularity. It was all the matter in the universe. It wasn't nothing. It was everything.
The matter doesn't have to "know" how to come together. They come together through attraction.
YOu move on to abiogenesis (not evolution, and your idea is wrong entirely)
As for lungs vs gills, look up the lungfish.
YOu don't know anything about what you're talking about.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
Your logic is quite funny.
humanforpresident 4 years ago
Where did god come from? You lose.
humanforpresident 4 years ago
Howdy. Your video is sad to see: you have no knowledge of the subjects you are pretending to debate about, and I cannot imagine why you would subject yourself to such humiliation.
By the way, one does not believe in evolution: evolution is an observed fact and not something one "believes" in.
Desertphile 4 years ago
All fossils proven as hoaxes! pfff...what load of BS.
theres over 70 000 fossils species described and more is coming every month. Are you being homeschooled by the way?
Archosaur 4 years ago
well no i go to public school and 70,000 thats big BS
endiscomi1 4 years ago
Actually, it isn't. And those are just the species. If you want to count total transitional fossil specimens you get figures well into the hundred thousands.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
YOu say Lucy was a chimp? Think again. She had many human features along with chimp features.
/watch?v=CzPQ0Yvksk8
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
a team of 20 scientists studied it and they maid a disclaimer on paper saying it was a 3 foot chimp
endiscomi1 4 years ago
You mean AiG? Or do you mean the actual scientists who didn't say it was a chimp, but that it just wasn't a direct ancestor, which was the general opinion all along. Lucy is quite clearly not a chimp. She's not a direct ancestor, but was closely related to our direct ancestor and shows a clear indication of human evolution. Watch the video I sent you. You say we don't listen to Kent Hovind, but you didn't watch my video. That makes you a hypocrite.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
please cite this paper.
rxbandit21 4 years ago
Nabraska man was a mistake. Pigs and humans have similar teeth. And scientists didn't reconstruct the entire body from a tooth. That was a newspaper, and scientists were constantly complaining about it because it owuld be inaccurate.
Neanderthals aren't old men with arthritis. 3-600 had RICKETs, and they had a brow ridge (also found on childrem so old age isn't an explanation), 50% thicker bones, outward jaw, larger brain, and many other non-human features.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
We can see how the can was made; or the car. We can find out who made it. We can understand and see where. YOu can't understand how God made the universe, there's no proof of it, you can't visit his universe factory.
Further more, none of that had ANYTHING to do with evolution.
Strawman alert.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
look at the banana its perfect it fits perfectly in your hand plus it has a tab to open it thats not natural selection its God and this thing is proof of evolution debunked
endiscomi1 4 years ago
The banana was created by artificial selection. A wild banana looks like poop.
Kabane52 4 years ago
The bannana? YOu're kidding me. Okay. The banana you know today is the product of thousands of years of selective cross polenation by humans. We selectively bred them. Look at a wild banana; a real banana. They have weird shapes and have seeds in them. They don't have tabs at the top. Bananas we eat aren't even grown naturally. This argument was debunked easily, and shows no research on Kirk's part.
BalmungSama0 4 years ago
i like how you mention you did "research" in this video. seriously, i can't believe you fell for that ray comfort argument. last i heard, they weren't even using that one since it's so insane. the bananas you know of have been cultivated throughout the years. look at a wild banana and try to repeat this bs.
rxbandit21 4 years ago
perhaps you should first check what theory of evolution contains?
BIG BANG IS NOT PART OF THE DARWINS EVOLUTIONARY THEORY!
check wikipedia if you don't believe me.
Archosaur 4 years ago