Players evolve over time. Of course Hewitt, Roddick, Safin, Nalbandian (and so on) are better than the players in the 90's. Federer, with the skills he has today, probably would have won every single Slam back then, because players get better. Just like Novak Djokovic plays better right now than any other player has in the history of tennis. It's just normal. Just look at mens' 100m sprint. The world records get faster by each generation because they can learn things from earlier generations.
SAMPRAS IS STILL THE BEST PLAYER OF ALL TIME; HE HAD A REALLY CHALLENGE IN THE 90s, whats now?? FED and a field of fucking idiots who play for the fucking money...
@slatz20 ok i dont wanna be rude, but you son of a bitch stretch your ears and listen.
every players join the tournament for money. But there is more than that. They play with their heart, performing all the beauty on the court when millions of people watching only two of them.
Ask yourself, during his career, earning more than $60 million, why would Federer cried after a loss, especially at a Grand Slam final?
It is the pride, the honour to hold the trophy, to be the Best Player of All Time.
@michaelowen8 Thats why he won so often u moron. because he doesnt play for the money...the other bitches does. Like Roddick or Dawidenko. U really think Federer had a Chance in the 90s??? What a fucking joke. He would have won perhaps 2 or 3 Grand Slams. Thats all. And Sampras is the greatest of all Time. He had the toughest field to beat. - Agassi, Edberg, Chang, Goran Ivanisevic, Boris Becker, Patrick Rafter...they all played for the Title.
@slatz20 I bet you know nothing about tennis. It has been a great debate about who's the greatest of all time. U said Federer could not win in the 90s because Agassi,Edberg,Chang,.... were greater than players in Federer's time?? U r totally wrong. Dont tell me Roddick,Hewitt,Safin,Djokovic,Nadal,Nalbadian,Murray all play for money.Most of them have won a grand slam title, and because of that, they will not play only for money.I bet my life that none of them are worse than Edberg,Chang,Becker,.
You can have your opinion and I respect that. You can think Sampras is the greatest of all time and Federer isn't - fine. But claiming that Federer would've won 2 or 3 Slams had he played in the 90's is just complete BULLSHIT. Still you could've said "he would've won 0 Slams" so at least props for that
I try to think of what could have been the word I meant to speak out but I can´t match that "spealing" to any other known word of the bank of English xD.
Haha 'spealing', i kinda like that word. Although you mistyped, i'm using the word for several purposes now. Gotta go now, my internet connection is spealing again.
I try to think of what could have been the word I meant to speak out but I can´t match that "spealing" to any other known word of the bank of English xD.
Players evolve over time. Of course Hewitt, Roddick, Safin, Nalbandian (and so on) are better than the players in the 90's. Federer, with the skills he has today, probably would have won every single Slam back then, because players get better. Just like Novak Djokovic plays better right now than any other player has in the history of tennis. It's just normal. Just look at mens' 100m sprint. The world records get faster by each generation because they can learn things from earlier generations.
niclassj 8 months ago
Somebody's majorly pissed. XD
UnlimitedFavorites 1 year ago
SAMPRAS IS STILL THE BEST PLAYER OF ALL TIME; HE HAD A REALLY CHALLENGE IN THE 90s, whats now?? FED and a field of fucking idiots who play for the fucking money...
slatz20 1 year ago
@slatz20 are you really serious?????
wingra10 11 months ago
@wingra10 totally
slatz20 11 months ago
@slatz20 ok i dont wanna be rude, but you son of a bitch stretch your ears and listen.
every players join the tournament for money. But there is more than that. They play with their heart, performing all the beauty on the court when millions of people watching only two of them.
Ask yourself, during his career, earning more than $60 million, why would Federer cried after a loss, especially at a Grand Slam final?
It is the pride, the honour to hold the trophy, to be the Best Player of All Time.
michaelowen8 11 months ago
@michaelowen8 Thats why he won so often u moron. because he doesnt play for the money...the other bitches does. Like Roddick or Dawidenko. U really think Federer had a Chance in the 90s??? What a fucking joke. He would have won perhaps 2 or 3 Grand Slams. Thats all. And Sampras is the greatest of all Time. He had the toughest field to beat. - Agassi, Edberg, Chang, Goran Ivanisevic, Boris Becker, Patrick Rafter...they all played for the Title.
slatz20 11 months ago
@slatz20 I bet you know nothing about tennis. It has been a great debate about who's the greatest of all time. U said Federer could not win in the 90s because Agassi,Edberg,Chang,.... were greater than players in Federer's time?? U r totally wrong. Dont tell me Roddick,Hewitt,Safin,Djokovic,Nadal,Nalbadian,Murray all play for money.Most of them have won a grand slam title, and because of that, they will not play only for money.I bet my life that none of them are worse than Edberg,Chang,Becker,.
TheTonbeo101 9 months ago
Cool story, bro.
And btw, your comment is a complete joke.
89Pleasek 8 months ago
@89Pleasek fuck OFF IDIOTS
slatz20 8 months ago
You can have your opinion and I respect that. You can think Sampras is the greatest of all time and Federer isn't - fine. But claiming that Federer would've won 2 or 3 Slams had he played in the 90's is just complete BULLSHIT. Still you could've said "he would've won 0 Slams" so at least props for that
89Pleasek 8 months ago
HOW IS THERE NO HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS INCREDIBLE MATCH ON YT. I JUST CANT BELIEVE IT.
seriously...
AnimeIntroStyles4 1 year ago
Could anyone please post the highlights of this match ?!
BEAUTEEM 1 year ago
GET A HAIR CUT!
jzrnsk 2 years ago
Wait why is this on youtube lol
KolYma89 2 years ago
he had nothing to lose at that moment.
zeriousLy 2 years ago
Comment removed
AlphaDraconis7 2 years ago
that's federer i guess. challenges every important point ...
soulestazn 2 years ago
if it`s that close and it`s such an important point why shouldn`t he challenge?
Haengsmachi 2 years ago
yeah so right haengsmachi! and also right kolyma89 why is this uninteresting shit on yt?
ede38 2 years ago
Jajaja this FEDERER....XD
He makes me laugh when comes up with those "spealing" features ...
MattyOyola21 3 years ago
Comment removed
Locomotivefan2009 2 years ago
Comment removed
MattyOyola21 2 years ago
To be sincere man..
I dont even know what I tried to say xD...
I try to think of what could have been the word I meant to speak out but I can´t match that "spealing" to any other known word of the bank of English xD.
MattyOyola21 2 years ago
Comment removed
Locomotivefan2009 2 years ago
Who knows?
Actually, I dont even remember to have made that comment.
I had to have been a little bit "lost" when I made it up. xD
Im starting to get freaked out of myself lol.. ^^
Oh, I GOT IT !!!!!
I just realized !! I meant to write "speaking" and I misstyped "spealing" instead xD cuz the "L" key is beside "K" key ..you know
Sorry Man xD lol
MattyOyola21 2 years ago
Haha 'spealing', i kinda like that word. Although you mistyped, i'm using the word for several purposes now. Gotta go now, my internet connection is spealing again.
RockyPeeters008 2 years ago
Oh ... lol ... So lets make up our minds and decide on a particular meaning to that "word" or "kind of word" xD
MattyOyola21 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To be sincere man..
I dont even know what I tried to say xD...
I try to think of what could have been the word I meant to speak out but I can´t match that "spealing" to any other known word of the bank of English xD.
MattyOyola21 2 years ago