@Tsnore You don´t have to be a professor to find him guilty .... But when you´re famous you can do what you want .... Burn in hell rejected shitty O J !
"Controversial decision"? Only for the ignorant or the illiterate. The evidence was almost as overwhelming as the monstrosity of the lies and so called theory from the defense. He's now unarguably guilty beyond any reasonable doubt to ANYBODY who READ Simpson's voluntary written confession in "If I did It".
@armysniperman80 The mountain of DNA evidence, the blood trail, the suicide note, the Bronco attempt at escape, his behavior throughout the time before his surrender, the impossibility of any police conspiracy or planting of evidence, the testimony of Alan Parks, the sack of lies Simpson told the police, the testimony of Ron Shipp, Nicole's safe deposit box & statements, and a clear attempt of the defense to try everything but the innocence of their client. That was all presented to 12 morons.
@rogerrodd True, but nothing that proved without a doubt he did it. Did he probably do it? yes. But in a court of law you must prove that someone did it beyond a resonable doubt.
@armysniperman80 Beyond a reasonable doubt was met. A video taping of the crime wouldn't have convinced that jury. The evidence was so staggering with no reasonable cause to dismiss the MOST crucial factors of circumstantial and physical proof, not to mention common sense.
The main culprit was Ito who let Cochrane take over his courtroom. Count the number of identical objections in the prosecution's closing arguments that he continued to overrule but never stop.
@armysniperman80 It appears that in your world there would be no need for jails or sentences unless you could find juries of 12 eyewitnesses to the crime. You are in such a staggering legal minority, even some of his "Dream Team" attorneys have admitted they knew that he was guilty.
@armysniperman80 And that's why the American legal system is so flawed. It should not be that all any defense attorney has to do is suggest this and that. A defense lawyer should have to prove the defendant's innocence just as the prosecution has to prove his guilt. Also, anyone on trial for a serious crime should be legally bound to be put on the stand and answer the hard questions.
It's not what you know it's what you can prove. Blame the prosecution for putting up a shoddy case.
cabalofdemons 6 days ago
you should see OJ now--fat as a pig
SUNMAYDEN518 1 week ago
i thought nicole was almost beheaded
optionsupdate 4 weeks ago
Now that OJ is probably going to die in prison, where are those black supporters that stood behind him during this trial?
33quadx 1 month ago
WHO CARES !!!!!!! IF HE GUILTY OR NOT
inchhigh187 1 month ago
@inchhigh187 I imagine the families of the victims still care, even after the rest of the world stopped.
onlychild86 4 weeks ago
guilty
bipolarbat 1 month ago
Comment removed
bipolarbat 1 month ago
Inoccent.
MrAlcoholic11 2 months ago
Thank you for posting the OJ Simpson Case videos!
maltonangel 4 months ago
This all i'm thinking...
Quote from uncle Rockus from Boondocks: Guilty that Nigga is guilty. hang him!! I got that rope right here.
edwin172004 4 months ago 7
The jury ignored so much physical and circumstancial evidence...those idiots would have probably let Hitler off also !!!!
clev9980 4 months ago
even cock(head)ran regrets representing oj
thetwistedstreaks 5 months ago
Comment removed
lovelee182 6 months ago
Comment removed
lovelee182 6 months ago
Oj did it. Listen to Vince Bugliosi's case disseminated over an hour and a half in ten parts on YouTube.
Tsnore 6 months ago 6
@Tsnore Bugliosi is damn good. Just look at the Manson trial.
HydiestFaith 4 months ago
@Tsnore You don´t have to be a professor to find him guilty .... But when you´re famous you can do what you want .... Burn in hell rejected shitty O J !
J1405J 1 month ago
it is SO obvious the "evidence" was planted!
jjjonse 7 months ago
this is stupid propaganda crap!
jjjonse 7 months ago
OJ uuuh!!
joaovictor1994 7 months ago
"Controversial decision"? Only for the ignorant or the illiterate. The evidence was almost as overwhelming as the monstrosity of the lies and so called theory from the defense. He's now unarguably guilty beyond any reasonable doubt to ANYBODY who READ Simpson's voluntary written confession in "If I did It".
rogerrodd 8 months ago
@rogerrodd He's now unarguably guilty beyond any reasonable doubt to ANYBODY who READ Simpson's voluntary written confession in "If I did It".
Yes, but that wasn't available at the time. You have to prove that someone is guilty 'without a doubt', not that they 'probably' did it.
armysniperman80 8 months ago
@armysniperman80 The mountain of DNA evidence, the blood trail, the suicide note, the Bronco attempt at escape, his behavior throughout the time before his surrender, the impossibility of any police conspiracy or planting of evidence, the testimony of Alan Parks, the sack of lies Simpson told the police, the testimony of Ron Shipp, Nicole's safe deposit box & statements, and a clear attempt of the defense to try everything but the innocence of their client. That was all presented to 12 morons.
rogerrodd 8 months ago
@rogerrodd True, but nothing that proved without a doubt he did it. Did he probably do it? yes. But in a court of law you must prove that someone did it beyond a resonable doubt.
armysniperman80 8 months ago
@armysniperman80 Beyond a reasonable doubt was met. A video taping of the crime wouldn't have convinced that jury. The evidence was so staggering with no reasonable cause to dismiss the MOST crucial factors of circumstantial and physical proof, not to mention common sense.
The main culprit was Ito who let Cochrane take over his courtroom. Count the number of identical objections in the prosecution's closing arguments that he continued to overrule but never stop.
rogerrodd 8 months ago
@rogerrodd Still thats not beyond a reasonable doubt.
armysniperman80 7 months ago
@armysniperman80 It appears that in your world there would be no need for jails or sentences unless you could find juries of 12 eyewitnesses to the crime. You are in such a staggering legal minority, even some of his "Dream Team" attorneys have admitted they knew that he was guilty.
Thanks for the exchange but I'm done here.
rogerrodd 7 months ago
@armysniperman80 And that's why the American legal system is so flawed. It should not be that all any defense attorney has to do is suggest this and that. A defense lawyer should have to prove the defendant's innocence just as the prosecution has to prove his guilt. Also, anyone on trial for a serious crime should be legally bound to be put on the stand and answer the hard questions.
buttnut1080 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He was found not guilty because he is black. pure and simple
caralarma1 8 months ago
thanks.
2 more parts to come.
eddiemurphy12 9 months ago
@eddiemurphy12
All your vids are great man, subjects like boxing and OJ are right up my alley, keep em coming.
topcat42 8 months ago
@topcat42 cheers.
got another OJ documentary on the way.
eddiemurphy12 8 months ago
Interesting...Thanks for uploading
Whippsy1 9 months ago