Lecture 3 | New Revolutions in Particle Physics: Basic Concepts

[mphello]

It would sound funnier if he ate corn nuts instead of cookies.

[TRXW]

How do you record the voice of each student clearly and focused each time they ask a question?

[zomgthisisawesomelol]

Cookie addiction, it's a terrible thing!

[bundawartini]

Good, I like that you share this video, I wish success always explore the new revolutions in particle physics. In this lecture he talks about what a quantum field is and how it is related to particles.

[grunder20]

Who do you think has the most brilliant mind, Hawking or Susskind?

[onusbaum]

Creation operator for particle at position X: isn't it created at x=0 (the fourier transform of a plane frequency spectrum is a point at the origin, not at x, no) ?

[1isaacmusic]

I bet his nickname is " The Cookie Monster ". On a lighter note, the microphone is loud, I'm glad he's not eating corn on the cob.

[giftu2b]

Prof. Susskind's face looks angry at about 1:11 after Michael points out the probability for different momenta of the scattered photons...

[seanmPWH]

1:22:00 Isn't he being a little Copenhagen? Why not attribute the sq rt of 2 to the complementarity field? You say there is no such thing as a complementarity field....well now you have a good idea for your thesis, it's about time someone takes quantum mechanics to the next level.

[bhigr]

O.K. the superposition of momentum operators gives you a single operator that creates a single particle at a particular place r. The momentum of the particle could be any possible momentum with equal probability. That is in agreement with the uncertainty principle...

[bhigr]

creation operator for particle at position X. k gives me its momentum. What about the uncertainty principle? Isn't that violated, if I create as particle with defined momentum and position?

[gragsel]

@SpecterReflector it isn't. He explains what kind of lecture it is, in the 1st Lecture on Quantum Mechanics

[MalaTemporaCurrunt]

more cookies!