AHAHAH I've never laughed so much in all my life! you are just showing how much pathetic you are. basically you are claiming that a civilization of 2000 years ago is turkish just because MAYBE etruscans came from a western region of ANATOLIA (the way turkey was called back then), when that land had actually nothing to do with turkish nomads? in those times anatolia was actually populated by greeks, so just stop making you even more ridiculous and try to make something useful out of your life.
"That the Etruscans were Turanians, and that they belonged to the North Turanian or Altaic branch of the Turanian stem, cannot be denied."
(Victoria Institute (Great Britain), Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute, Or Philosophical Society of Great Britain , Band 10, BiblioBazaar, 2009, p.200)
"[...] how it was that the language of the Etruscans must be identified with the speech of the Turanian races, and with no others."
(Victoria Institute (Great Britain), Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute, Or Philosophical Society of Great Britain , Band 10, BiblioBazaar, 2009, p.206)
"Next, if the Etruscans were Turanians, their religion should also be
Turanian. This is a very important branch of the evidence, which I can only speak of in the very briefest manner. Our information as to the religion of the Etruscans is ample."
(Victoria Institute (Great Britain), Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute, Or Philosophical Society of Great Britain , Band 10, BiblioBazaar, 2009, p.199)
"It is now generally agreed that the Etruscans were a Turanian people ; the representations of their physical features, their arts and customs, tending all in that direction."
To point the similar political systems used by the Turks and the Etruscans and that there is a substantial connection between the Etruscan ‘Fanum Voltumnae’ (yearly political assemblies) and the ‘Kurultay’ of the Turks, it is ample to cite Deguines, De Groot and Klaproth: [...]
“We gather from this language (especially from the known numerals) that they were of Altaic, or Turanian, stock, like their Asiatic neighbours the Hittites and Kati.”
(J. G. R. Forlong, Encyclopedia of Religions or Faiths of Man, Teil 2, Kessinger Publishing, 2003, p.72)
“In the Etruscan confederacy of 12 cities each king was independent, and all were allied for war-an universal Turanian custom which we may trace among Hittites, Akkadians, and non-Aryans in India. [...] [The word Vol appears to be the Turkish aul. and Akkadian alu, for a 'camp' or 'city'].”
(J. G. R. Forlong, Encyclopedia of Religions or Faiths of Man, Teil 2, Kessinger Publishing, 2003, p.74)
The names of the gods of Etruria are explained by Dr. Isaac Taylor, and others, by aid of Turanian languages. Tina, the sky spirit (Tatar Turkish Tin), Summano (Mongol Sumans, Lapp Tuman, 'holy'), Usil, the rising sun (Finnic, Usal, Asal, 'morning' or Turkish Işil 'light' or 'bright'), Tushna, the midday sun (Tatar Turkish Tus ''south), Janus, the god of creation [...] (Tatar Turkish Jen 'god'), [...]
Sethluns was Vulcan (from Set or Süt, Turkic, 'to burn'), Sancus was a Sabine god (Akkadian San, Turkish Sang, 'mighty'), Thana was Diana (Tatar Turkish Tan 'light' or Yacut/Sakha Turkish ting 'dawn'). [...] The Lares were spirits, as were the Penates (Tatar Turkish ban, 'spirit')."
(J. G. R. Forlong, Encyclopedia of Religions or Faiths of Man, Teil 2, Kessinger Publishing, 2003, pp.75-76)
And btw in that time Greeks did not existed, the first time when they appeared was with the name "Yavana" from South Asia. They were nomads, or rather noble horseman.
Furthermore, see for Assyrian and Sumerian "Kil Tablets":
A greta history professor once said. "History would be great if only it were true". Referring to the propensity of historians to view the results of their findings through their own world perspective. A common mistake and one that can happen even when you try hard to avoid it. It's the nature of history. We must sometimes look deeper to reveal the truth.
@geezerdombroadcast ATATURK ALSO SAID IF THE HISTORY WRITERS ARE NOT LOYAL TO THE MAKERS OF THE HISTORY, THE REALITY BECAMES SO ABSURD THAT COMES BACK TO HIT US WITH AN UNRECOGNIZABLE ASPECT.
Oh my God are we realy serious; "the west is hiding the truth"? Please give me a break. There have certainly been some despicable fools and egotistical idiots who claimed to be scientists and archeologists. There have been many racist and outrageous lies told in the past. The reality of modern scientific techniques is such that the kind of zenophobic rascist lies that were typical of the early 20th and 19th centuries are very unlikely to pass muster for long today. It's rediculous.
@geezerdombroadcast I must agree with you. I am sorry for my past disrespectful mistakes. However, old italian schoolars in the beginning of the 20th century even denied an Etruscan origin of the Latin Civilization. Now everything is becoming clear. I will publish a new video in a few days about the Etruscans. There will be serious academic quotations from modern times regarding the Turanian character of the Etruscans.
@YiannisThiakos the continuity of greek peoples is a national myth invented in the 19th century. Athens was a small town of less than 50,000 people the majority of which spoke arnavitika. Modern greek is a language like Israeli Hebrew or Esperanto, invented as a national need. People of greece today are nothing more than a mish mash of thousands of years of genetic gifting from invading men. Deal with it.
European facist governments wont accept that although they know the truth.But it is proved that Turks were living in Anatolia 15000years ago,before sumerians,urartu, hittite or greek civilizations.They immigrated to asia,they have already been using alphabet,their lives were democratic,even women were superior in many cases.Then they came back to anatolia their own lands again. Thats why Etrucians are related to Turks.We are anatolian and asian people not white, european or arabic.
Turkish identity shaped during 500 AD. Even if the Huns or those Turks came from invented the Writing for Europe that doesn't mean The Huns were Turks. These step people covered such a large area that defiately from one area to anther they were two distinct ethnicites. Linguistic similarities don't even prove that Turks are direct decendants of huns, even the Ugure turks. Agulatative languages were spoken even in ancient near east. But, this way of classifying languages doesn't proof genetics.
It is plausable to say most of the European population originated from southern Russia into Urals, and baltic, north of black sea. But, All the population weren't turks. Turks are branched from those poppulation with their distinct genetics. It doesn't mean Turks are hun of the same sub-ethnic origin. Huns from chinese region must of been as different racially to the huns near black sea as Dravidians are from Indo-Europeans. This video has Extreme view.
Runic alphabet was used by Germanics and Turks claim its theirs. Maybe the Viking ship designs were taken from Turks also. And lets say the Etruscans were from Huns, are Turks really from huns?
The mega huns group were all over the Russian steps, a large area. How could they all belong to Turkic group. Their genetic makeup varried widely from east to west and from North to South.
We all are blood brothers to African pigmy. This is not a coinsidence.
languages. DUTCH:GELUK ENG:LUCK. GERMAN: GLUCK in Turkish its Güllük.
DUTCH:MENEER= TR: MEN ER( iam a man) You can go whole day with lists like this Just with ANAGRAM technices you can find the Turkish word. ANAGRAM= oNu GiRAM(breaking a word) They tried to vanish all Turkish traces during rennaissance.
TRANSLATE= TR-AN-LAT-E=TERSANLAT. They couldnt make a new language of their own so they just changed the structure of the word! coincedence that i find the same word with the same meaning NOOOOO
Even Latin,Greek,European words are from Turkic origin.
For example TRUe=TogRU /ADVERT=AD VERTi/ AQUA= AKiyO/ GLADIATOR= AGLADI TOR/ ONCE= önce/ ACCIDENT=AKSI EDENTi (remarkeble you write it different but pronounce it like in Turkic) GATHER=GETIR/ GENESIS= GUNES IZ(SUN symbol of the christians!) HOSTILe= HOS TEIL/ PLAN=yaPiLAN/ NAME=NAMi/ WARRIOR=VURIYOR/ BROTHER=BiRADER/ CRISIS=CARESIS/ INCIDENT=icitend(i)/ DEFAULT=DEF OLTu These are examples of the english language this is possible with all
Truth: Latin=veritas, Eng. Origin from W.Saxon=tríewþ, tréowþ, trýwþ; advert is a contraction for advertisement, doesn't work; Aqua: seems to suggest a proto-Indo-European language, doesn't tell us from where; Gladiator: This is a Turkic neo-logism, adopted from Latin roots; once: Old English ānes from Old Saxon enes . . . as I look at this more, I'm getting curious about where you got your information from.
@yichengyi BY THE WAY WHERE DO YOU GET THE WORD "PROTO INDO EUROPEAN" FROM FOR GODS SAKE. CAN YOU PLEASE PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT IS THIS WORD AND CAN YOU GIVE ME AN EXAMPLE OF THAT LANGUAGE. WHAT IS SAXON? NEOLOGISMS OR NAIVE COMPARISON ARE ON OF THE STRONGEST INSTRUMENTS OF TRUE CIENTISTS ALSO. CHECK THE MARSILIANA TABLET AND YOU WILL SEE THAT THE ORIGIN OF LATIN IS ETRUSCAN 'OKUKUPULT" WHICH MEANS ALPHABET BUT IT WAS READ FROM RIGHT TO LEFT. LOOK EAST. LEARN PROTO TURKISH. READ FROM RIGHT TO LEFT.
@Mertt03 Etrüsklerin Türk kökenli olduğu doğru olabilir ama İngilizcedeki sözcükler Türkçeye o kadar benzeyemez çünkü Modern İngilizce bir Hint-Avrupa dilidir ve eski İngilizce Türkçeye benzemez
@IdelUralState DOSTUM BEN 2000 DE PARIS BILIMSEL ARASTIRMA MERKEZININ EYLUL BULTENIYLE CURUTULDU SANIYORDUM HINT AVRUPA TEORISININ. AMA YINE BU AYNI KURULUSUN 19. YY SONLARINDADA BULTENLER YAYINLAYIP TA O ZAMANLAR HINT AVRUPA KURAMININ SAVURMA OLDUGUNU IFADE EDIP SUPHELERINI ORTAYA KOYMUSLARDI. VIDEOLARINI BEGENIYLE TAKIP EDIYORUM.
The Etruscans? Pah, a bunch of hedonists that make the Cretans look genteel, and it even shows in their disgusting religion. If the West is and was primitive, Altai-Buryat horsethieves were even more so. Say hello to the Afrocentrists for me... xD
If West takes an ancient civilization as "mysterious people, unreadable scripts, not understand their language..so on"..be sure they were Turkish. On the other hand West can decipher Dolphin's language and can publish Dolphinian Dictionary.
@MegaRabbitPower I would rather say agglutinative speaker nations in the past and in the present would like to have a word with the fusional speaker nations of today.
Btw 84 Egyptian hieroglyphs are in origin Turkic Runes (Tamğa).
Professor Mario Alinei says the etruscan language was uralic, from Carpathian Basin. Etruscan runes and hungarian runes are same in 75%
In my opinion the etruscans were sumerians. Our city Esztergom is sumerian named from Isztergam. Iszter is Danube, Gam is elbow in english. Esztergom is a city of danube-bank. The toscanian people are J2, E3b so anatolian-middle easterns. Or troyans? Etruscans had boats and troyans too.
@HungarianHistory then you'll might watch my video about my reading of Rasen ("etruscan") inscriptions... I can read also many Hungarian words through Slavonic language without a problem. Reason? Let's say "we" once lived together in great state called Tartaria - old Aryan Russia before western "historians" stole our history...
@VendPrekmurec in britannica it wrotes as rasena which same with in Turkish asena in the same meaning of she-wolf. thay are purely Turkish no european, no greek, no armenian. even their rulers have the title of tarkan which is also Turkish. their first sculpture before bastardization with italians are with mongoloid eyes and round heads. I saw them.even whole italian dna is nnot same with them but only the ones in Etruria and Turks match them. not greeks, not armenians. they are not aryan.
EUROPEAN : NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO...OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
@Ascensiam Thank you for this advice. So you mean how the Etruscan-like writing system came to Central Asia? Good question. Do you know something about this ?
@Ascensiam what would make them move to east, steps?? %90 of ural-altaic ppl moved to west bcz there wasnt enough food, farming was not available there. europe knows about Huns and Mongols only. but there were more, like fins and estons, turks, scythians and even bulgars. native americans also belong to this orgin, so they all wanted to leave central asia...
if Kazim Mirsan is wrong why non of the scientist from europ proof the opposite they even can not say that Kazim Mirsan is wrong, if it is so easy then proof it, here you are
West never ever accept those theories. Ancient Greek was their foundation... It was some kind of Star Wars effect. For a more than millenia there where Turkish barbarians and this was saying....
can some one tell me, if altaic peoples became turcic around XIII century a.d., how come in this video they're claimed to be turcic at 700b.c. its like 2000 years difference?
besides, turkish and other "turcic" people are totally different ethnical groups.
Bro, the west will NEVER accept a Turkic origin for the Etruscans, it would mess up their whole western oriented, indo-european view of history. I read a year or so back an Italian report linking the Etruscans with Turks and a DNA study of some Italians and Turks showed remarkable similarities.
Mind you i'm not making any 'crazy claims'. Europeans will never accept that there is more to civilization than them, especially regarding Ural-Altaics. True, we were nomads, but that's not all.
@Ekimoglu You are absolutely right. The west would take it as an insult to relate Etruscans to Turkic origin. Past three centuries they are leading the game which empowered them to write the history based on their streotypes and religious motives. The questions is not "Would that ever change" but when?
Etruscans is Anatolian, from Lidyan ( Pelasgy, but not Greces). as i know Etruscans come from Scumers from Mesopotamia, becouse also i am from Scumer DNA R1 & R2 it is same peoples,
Etruscans is Anatolian, from Lidyan ( Pelasgy, but not Greces). as i know Etruscans come from Scumers from Mesopotamia, becouse also i am from Scumer DNA R1 & R2 it is same peoples, i am Caucasus-Iberian ( wite race,black sea), firsty proto-Iberians is Etruscs, Basque & Iberians= it is one race. .. e .t
@likamebonia17 Dude you know nothing. Because Etruscans are not identified genetically. There is no DNA from grave found.Etruscans are known through their cultural clues to Romans and Greeks. There is a theory of Etruscans in Aegean Sea and Italian Peninsula so as to explain some unspecified (in Past) artifacts and traditions of the Romans and Greeks that were common even before they met each other. But no one knows if it was a distictive tribe or a mixture og Aegean and Micrasiatic people :)
i don't know you..but thank you for making this video. They are facts of history which we never forget.. if you interested you can read Sinan Meydan and M. Kemal Atatürk's research of Lost Continental of MU. Of course there is James Churchward's Lost Continental of MU too.
İ'm Türk. And i proud... We are not saying whole world is Turk. We are saying Turks are one of the oldest civilization on planet earth.
Etruscans werent türks but sumerian immigrants , the genetic contact with the anatolians the anatolian and not the asian! all folks have common people and ruler DNA, the pre-türks have sumerian elamite ruler classes and altaian common people, today türks have anatolian common under oghur rulers!
democrasy ,metallurgy, alphabet, architecture ALL GREEK WORDS ...that are fouNd in modern turkish language AS GREEK WORDS AGAIN!!...if these things are turkic inventions then why they have only a GREEK WORD TO INTERPRETE AND DEFINE THEM?
IF ALPHABET ITSELF IS A TURKIC INVENTION THEN WHY THE FIRST TWO LETTERS OF THE GREEK ALPHABET ARE ALPHA AND BETA? OTTOMANS AND SELJUCS DID NOT HAVE THEIR OWN ALPHABET THEY HAD THE ARABIC TILL ATATURK ADAPTED THE LATIN ALPHABET..(WHICH DERIVES FROM THE GREEK)
@ElectraofMaced0n Well, it is this kind of thinking leads you to the same strange place this guy has started from; meaning all culture etc is of Greek origin!! Which is not. Take for example: the Greek alphabet was taken from the Phoenicians, so that's why, the names of aleph, beth, gimmel etc. do have a meaning in the semitic langauges like Hebrew and Arabic (Beth and Bait= house). Saying that Turks did not have their alphabet before the current one does not make sense for this fact for once.
@ElectraofMaced0n Latin alphabet that derives from Greek does that make any sense? Latin is one form and Greek is another form so each developed each other?
There are some new theories in the last ten years,
that is sure that during the ice age and after there were a neolitic culture in Europe centered it to the Charpatian Basin. These people invented the writing, the animal traction, the wheel, aht bronz etc. They are the acsestor of the etrusks and also the mezopotamian culture. Probably together with the mezopotamian the stepp as also used by these people founding the scythians. All used the same writings. The turks,chineses learned it later.
This is a load of crap, the Etruscans are more ancient that the "Turkic" people, there was no such thing as "Turkic languages" by the time Etruscans existed.
The Etruscans were a Turanian people, they were definitely not Indo-Europeans. The Etruscans are Trojans who landed in Western Italy in Tuscany after the Fall of Troy. The Etruscans founded Rome, and the last king of Rome was a Etruscan named Tarquinnous Superbus. Roman architecture, religion, and culture was Etruscan in nature. Romans worshiped household gods and ancestors.
@He101A The etrusks were a side shot of the Charpatian Basin centered european neolitic culture.
These people were definite not indo-europeans beacuse the runic writing they developed, were fit to the aglitunative lenguage speaking people, like the hungarain, finn, hun, scythian, turk. The writing is in sinergy with the spoken lenguage. Search on the net: "Hungarian rovas" and you will see that the rovás is streight descendant from this writing, and most similar to the etrusks.
The Etruscan very easy readable by current Russian.
Russian was the first language of human civilization.
The word Russia stands up for "race".
The first colony of race people landed in Ural Mountains current Russia, began to mix up with local people - cavemen, climate was subtropical. Later on when climate got colder with Ice Age they went to south, south-east, west, diverting the basic language. Iindoeuropean prolanguage was simply almost current Russian.
The Etruscans came from Anatolia, not Central Asia. You are not Turkic, you are Turkish. Few people in Turkey are of Turkic descent, the vast majority of Turks are a cocktail of Mediterranean lineages. Your DNA does not lie.
Central Asia -> Anatolia -> Balkan -> Greece and Italy
This is the right root, our linguistic Inscriptions AND genetical roots does not lie, as well. I am even going much further and say "the whole globe" is of Turkic descend.
@joseffritzlismydaddy yuuh listen anatolia is the home of turks for thousands of years.Moreover turks migrate to middle east, balkan, caucasia anatolia for thousands of years.Even in 1071 millions of oguz turks migrated to anatolia,caucasia,iran and middle east you brainfucked stupid shit.So if majority of turkey is not turkic who the fuck is then turkic you foolish bastard? The few genetic research made by devious motherfuckers who try to fool turks are the last fucking fake shit.
@joseffritzlismydaddy Not true. In Anatolia even Christian communities not mixed by each other. Armenians and Greeks even have not become cocktail. They lived for centuries separate under their own patriaches (Thanks to Ottomans and Seldjuks) Jews have always been on their own. Other races came before were 80% Turkic anyhow..like Lydians, Karians, Frigians.. the rest were Greek colonies once they came and left Anatolia totally in 1922 for good.
@deeptuber109 Funny, racist idea. "Mixing with each other" was not by interracial marriages. It was mainly by mass conversion of religion. Even 100 years ago it happened. Even today there are many ppl with a hybrid-religion and their identities are fading away.There is no accusation to any country. Greece and Balkan nations did the same. They chased away Balkan Turks during Balkan wars. They either hided their identity (if possible), ran away or died.80000 ppl were arriving to Anatolia daily.
@frsn4 What mass conversion of religion? What you talking about? In exchange of population only Turks moved to Anatolia. Islam converted Serbs stayed in their land. They sill there ..in Bosnia, Herzegovina, Kosova.. etc.
If your words were true.. we Turks would have been Arabs now as we all converted from Shamanism to Islam.
Race mixture is not an easy thing. You and your kind recently pumping this funny story;
@deeptuber109 i'm sorry but if the turks in anatolia were pure "turks" by race, we would have slant eyes but we dont lol anyway some of the converted societies kept their identities i know, but after balkan wars many non turkish muslims arrived to anatolia, now most of them dont have their slavic identities, that's what i mean. today the exact number of albanians in turkey is not known. most of them have turkish identity. perhaps you should read more
@joseffritzlismydaddy Anatolia was dead my friend and stayed dead with the world during that geologic disaster so called ice age for 56.000 yrs. 14.000 BC is the date for Great Migrations that all sourced from Central Asia plateau to Europe and Anatolia and some blacks from Victoria /Africa to Europe.
Lydians..father of Etruscans were pure Turkic nation as West say.. we don't know them, we can't read their scripts as they say same for Etruscans. West better say.. we don't want to know them.
@deeptuber109 Dude. Since your language is a simplex of Arabic, Altaic and greek with french acccent. This is the reason why you can read as you say, the etruscan plates. Dont you see it is clear? I can use a turkic scientific word to explain this to you, "HISTORY". Or esle i can use an other turk word, "MUSIKi" to help you inderstand etruscan more easily... hahahahahahahaha there are many turkic word in Aegean history I see now, I am so sorry :D hahahahaha
@joseffritzlismydaddy ...this is told from western cocksuckers.But the truth is anatolia is the home of turks for thousands of years.There are countless migrations to anatolia.The last migration was after 1071.This was only one part of migration.The migration of turks starts in central asia.And turks spread all over europe,asia, america.PS: The DNA was applied on some guys in some parts of turkey we dont actually know.Moreover these tests are made by western and their intensions are well known.
@joseffritzlismydaddy The vast majority of turkey is turk.This can not be denied.Millions of turkey moved to anatolia, balkan middle east, iran, caucasia, wolga....And we are here for thousands of years.But you can not know.Ever wondered?You get feed with lies.And so far you have hidden turkss history.But true history is coming back and it will come on you motherfuckers to be honest.Lies got short legs.
@NothingWithoutALLAH There is no hidden turk history. On the contrary, the first Neo turks had to join a no-nation-state together so as not to collapse from its majotiry that were many minorities. So they changed and used myths and stories from there cultures so as to make a fake story to be tought same to all children in the new states schools, do not forget internet was not common those days:D.And what was happening in Deap Anatolia was not easily tought to the west.
@joseffritzlismydaddy : There is no Turkic race. Turks were a combination of many different races. Turks were in Anatolia before there was a Roman Empire.
@ancalimonungol Battle of Manzikert (1071) was a landmark for Turkic migration to Anatolia. You think Turks were in Anatolia long before the Roman Empire???
@ancalimonungol yanlisin var kardes türk irki diye bir sey var fakat türkler büyük bir bölgeye uzun zaman önce bile yayildigi icin baska milletlerle temas olmustur fakat bu türkleri türklükten cikarmaz gördügün gibi dünyada 250 milyon türk var.Bazi türklerde baska milletlerle karisma söz konusu olsa bile iclerindeki bir damla türk kani yüregini alevlendirir.Türklerin Ana yurdu mu kitasi hesaba katilmadiginda orta asyadir.Ordan anadoluya cok önceden gelmislerdir herkesten önce.Yazili belgeler var
@ancalimonungol Before Roman Empire We were at anatolia. We have tamga and symbols at all anotolia. Scientists says that they are here since 7000 years at rocks.. They are turkic tamgas.
@joseffritzlismydaddy 1 cell or 1 atom of Turkish origin is enough you to be a Turkish...my friend,,, BEING TURKISH IS NOT A MATTER OF RACE THERE IS NOT SUCH A THING CALLED RACE ...BEING A TURK IS THE SENSE AND IF YOU HAVE THAT SENSE STRONG THEN YOU ARE A TURK
@foxserkan I am not racist, but... Only if you belong to no race, and you know it, you can easily say that this you said. Race is a matter of genetics but also is a matter of choise. Race is also concluded by its culture (if they have) and civilization (most races had no civilization, civilization and culture are not the same thing you know).For Example the European and American World are a continous of Roman and Greek Civilizations, but doesnt mean that they belong to that race, right?
@joseffritzlismydaddy agree 100%. i read the research article about etruscan dna being closest to today's turkish ppl's dna. there is a small number of ppl with relatively pure turkic dna, they live on mountains and isolated areas
@joseffritzlismydaddy Well noone of us and serious people cares about your senseless comment.Anatolia is the home of turks for at least 12.000 years.You want evidence ? There are countless alone in anatolia over 5000 turk' scripts (turkish tamgas) you can not read because you are not a turk but a scum maybe a cocktail you mentioned before ? If Anatolia is not turks then the world is not humans you moron it can not be any obvious.The time is running for turks.Truths will be accepted anyways.
@joseffritzlismydaddy Ottomans were very careful not to mix the race. During their reign even Greeks and Armenians, 2 Christian races couldn't have the chance to mix. Our Sultans founded 2 separate Patriarchs and kept them live in their communities. The reason was simple to understand; Not to loose Turkish fighting spirit. Janissaries were kept separate and were not allowed to get married until retirement. If they have a boy, he was to be a Janissary as well. So no cocktail here dude.
@deeptuber109 This is a lie. The conqueror of Constantinopole was of Greek blood and the muslim architect Sina was total greek and they also both spoke greek. All Turk musques are coppies of Greek churches and arab mosques. Ottomans were not a blood line they were a governing "Gate" or however you call it. The guy with most power and money rulled the rest palace. And people withh greek blood were famous till 1800's when turks started the big clearance killing or arresting greeks for silly reason
However, Phoenicians have their origins from interior Asia as they immigrated to Minor Asia from Northern Caspian sea region as Avars did later.
Troya Phoenician and Etrusks may definitely have Turkic origins. Consider the Kokturk alphabet used in Orkhun texts. And similar words used in Summeria.
Turks build huge pyramides in Macunzhuang China similar to the ones in North Africa and South America.
I'm nog agree with you. It couldnt and it's NOT true. The Alphabet is from the Etruscan origin. The origins of the Greeks are the balkans. The balkan came about 5.000 BC from Asia. But the Etruscans came 14.000 years ago from Asia to Turkey. The Etruscans couldnt translated in latin or greek. The alphabet can translate Only in kazak language and other Turkic languages.
@IdelUralState True...I see the sharing of cultural language here. Russian aplhabet = is latin + turkic, agreeable. Roots point to a turkic origin is obvious here. I don't think the phonecian came up with it, maybe borrowing from east to west as they migrated into eastern europe. It is definitely can be traced to the Runes in Kazak and is of Turkic origin. This is the most plausible proof...
Haha, some of those Turanians look quite like me, my heritage is western Chinese, Korean and English. As for the details of this video, it's highly likely that the Etruscans had Turkic heritage, but the point about the alphabet is untrue. The alphabet of the Etruscans and early Latin alphabet (Cumae alphabet) came from a long line of writing systems which were begat by the Proto-Greek alphabet, which came from Phoenician – you can trace it back to Cuneiform and Hieroglyphs after that.
Turks are not even hominid, they come from an ancient race of aliens known as the fullofshitians, who were known throughout the universe as a people who stole all knowledge and claimed it as their own on youtube videos. It is rumored that they may be related to the black Hebrew Israelites, however they come from a reptilian race, so pending future dna sequencing studies, it will be hard to tell.
Holy shit ? Really ? I never heard of this "fullofshitians". Where do they came from ? Would you like to tell me more about this ? Are there scientific studies about it ? I am a little bit confused, because I always thought that Atatürk was Hitlers ideal.
@IdelUralState Without a doubt Hitler took interest in many leaders throughout history, that does not mean he respects Turkish people, or their culture. I am glad that these nationalist movements are spreading across the world, but people need to quit making up fake history to make their race look like it is without flaw. If there is a master race, it is definitely not Turkish, and and definitely is not European either.
I understand your racial position, but Turks are not representative for any race on this earth. Being a Turk is being a member of a Culture an not a race, there is no turkish race. We can be europid, mongoloid and negrid. "Turk" (Turuk) means "in God believing man" and has its origin in Tengrism (Shamanism). And btw the only country which Hitler did not wanted to attack was the Turkish Republic, because of the "aryan" leader Ataturk and his nationalistic ideal.
@DefenceSpeech We all know as a historical fact that after world's 56.000 years of ice age Great migrations sourced from Central Asia to all over the world. Regretfully some tribes mixed up with orangutans escaped from the heat and draught of Africa to Europe.. So I suggest don't pay attention to history books written by those monkeys. Modern archeology tells us clear about master race, master culture, alphabet and civilization. . you can digest or not.. the name is "TURK"
@DefenceSpeech Yeah.. one feels happy as the truth learned and yet to come more. We're just starting to reveal.. so my dear better save your energy for future panics.
@IdelUralState A person who has full of shit.. presents here only shit from the only organ functions at him.. so better let him in his garbage.. he stinks!
This their culture as they even deny the immaculate DNA works of world famous American, Italian, Spanish universities and go by their grandma's stories about Turks. According to them 16 great Turkic empires created by barbarians!.. Real shit is this.
Thank you IdilUralState for your great work to enlighten the hidden history of Turks.
Im not interested in races, bur it is very possible that Etruscans have a relationship with prototurks or maybe they were prototurcs. their name may come from é turusuc which means "I am turusuq". it is just like Turkmen. but there is a disinformation about Rome. they were not the succeeder of etruscans. they were a different group but they copied Etruscans and paganism. because of that they adopted the pagan culture of Etruscans. thats why the wolf figure in rome and turks are the same.
Interesting video, I am of Italian descent and recently took a Paternal DNA test that put me in a group sharing similar DNA from people in Turkey. This could certainly support that result.
This is right. A study by geneticist Alberto Piazza of the University of Turin linked the Etruscans to Turkey. The team compared DNA sequences with those from men in modern Turkey, northern Italy, the Greek island of Lemnos, the Italian islands of Sicily and Sardinia and the southern Balkans.
They found that the genetic sequences of the Tuscan men varied significantly from those of men in surrounding regions in Italy, and that the men from Murlo and Volterra were the most closely related to men from Turkey. In Murlo in particular, one genetic variant is shared only by people from Turkey.
@DarkShaula Their is some evidence to suggest the Etruscans originated south of the Black Sea, probably in Asia Minor. However, it's a stretch to label them as "Turkic". Ethnic Turkic people prior to the 5th century AD were largely confined to central Asia. Only several hundred years later did they expand westward into the Near East and Europe. So the Etruscan people predate Turkic expansion into Asia Minor by at least a millenia.
@snowstormcan You are talking about only one Turkish tribe like seldjuks entered Anatolia im 1071 AD.. in fact there were thousand of Turkish tribes all gathered in Central Asia to survive from ice age of 56.000 years and great migrations all sourced out from Central Asia where people protected against deadly effects of ice age. Many Turkish tribes came to Anatolia some just passed by and some settled there centuries ago. There are numerous findings there belong to Turks.
Hungarian and Etruscan language is similar. So similar that an educutated man who know the proto-hungarian language can read particular the Etruscan writings.The todays turkish and hungarian language is similar too.
The steppe rune writing(used by turkic and scyhtian nation) was written from right to left so as the Etruscans. The Hun and the etruscan alphabet-characters are similar too.
Yes indeed brother you are so right ! The hypocrite west want to hide our Turanian History they want to hide all the ancient Hunnic, Bulgarian etc. inventions and Empires as well.
@Zikhajj Fine, and you personally know this educated man, who know proto-hungarian and how at the same time has already read the etruscian writing to translating this to you? why dont you than write an articel abot this found????????!!!!
And Turkic people don't look like Africans :). The western mythe said that the first people are the AFricans. But that's not 100% scientifically proved. They spend billlions of dollars. So why is the Turkic history the oldest and the richest, answer that question:)
Don't forget that there are 39 turkish cultures in Asia (Turkic peoples). The history is too long to understand the whole history
HISTORYofGreece claims they are the descendants of Etruscans, ask why they can not read their writings but the TURKS. Latin alphabet comes from Turkish Runic alphabet and the Turks were in Anatolia 7000BC. You will eventually accept this and your historians cannot lie to you forever!!!
Etruscans can't be related to Indo-Europeans because Etruscans used Turkic deities and their language was agglutinative, what is typical for Turkic Peoples. Also Turks in the Altai areas are still blond and blue-eyed, it is their original look.
Here is the DNA results proving that Etruscans were in fact TURKIC ORIGIN. use google translate for translation...google;
1. ETRUSCHI VENUTI DALLA TURCHIA, LO DICE IL DNA DEI TOSCANI
2. The enigma of Italy's ancient Etruscans is finally unravelled
And just to let you know fabianogunes if HISTORYofGreece claims they are the descendants of Etruscans, ask why they can not read their writings but the TURKS.
Dass Problem ist, dass die Türkische Republik von äußeren imperialistischen Mächten im türkischen Parlament durch die anti-kemalistische AKP regiert wird. Erst wenn die Türkei wieder auf den kemalistischen Weg kommt, können solche Bücher wie die von Kazim Mirsan oder Haluk Tarcan im großen Stil veröffentlicht werde.
ETRUSCANS = THRACIANS = SUMERIANS = TROYANS = PELASGIANS, etc, are ALL ancient BULGARIANS!
spa05akw 1 week ago
TURKS are DESCENDANTS from BULGARIANS! BULGARIANS ruled the World!
spa05akw 1 week ago
TURKS are DESCENDANTS from BULGARIANS! BULGARIANS ruled the World!
spa05akw 1 week ago
AHAHAH I've never laughed so much in all my life! you are just showing how much pathetic you are. basically you are claiming that a civilization of 2000 years ago is turkish just because MAYBE etruscans came from a western region of ANATOLIA (the way turkey was called back then), when that land had actually nothing to do with turkish nomads? in those times anatolia was actually populated by greeks, so just stop making you even more ridiculous and try to make something useful out of your life.
xxnecspenecmetuxx 2 weeks ago
@xxnecspenecmetuxx
"That the Etruscans were Turanians, and that they belonged to the North Turanian or Altaic branch of the Turanian stem, cannot be denied."
(Victoria Institute (Great Britain), Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute, Or Philosophical Society of Great Britain , Band 10, BiblioBazaar, 2009, p.200)
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@IdelUralState
"[...] how it was that the language of the Etruscans must be identified with the speech of the Turanian races, and with no others."
(Victoria Institute (Great Britain), Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute, Or Philosophical Society of Great Britain , Band 10, BiblioBazaar, 2009, p.206)
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@IdelUralState
"Next, if the Etruscans were Turanians, their religion should also be
Turanian. This is a very important branch of the evidence, which I can only speak of in the very briefest manner. Our information as to the religion of the Etruscans is ample."
(Victoria Institute (Great Britain), Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute, Or Philosophical Society of Great Britain , Band 10, BiblioBazaar, 2009, p.199)
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@IdelUralState
"It is now generally agreed that the Etruscans were a Turanian people ; the representations of their physical features, their arts and customs, tending all in that direction."
(John Campbell, Etruria capta, Copp, Clark, 1886, p.2)
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@IdelUralState
"[...] it is evident the Etruscan is strictly an agglutinative dialect of the Turanian type."
(Hodder M. Westropp, Handbook of Egyptian, Greek, Etruscan and Roman Archeology, Kessinger Publishing, 2003, p.482)
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@IdelUralState
(PART 1)
To point the similar political systems used by the Turks and the Etruscans and that there is a substantial connection between the Etruscan ‘Fanum Voltumnae’ (yearly political assemblies) and the ‘Kurultay’ of the Turks, it is ample to cite Deguines, De Groot and Klaproth: [...]
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@IdelUralState
(PART 12
J. Deguines, “Histoire des Huns, des Turcs et des Mongols” Paris, 1856
De Groot, “Die Hunnen der vorchristlichen Zeit” Berlin 1921
H. J. Von Klaproth, “Mémoire sur l’identité des Toukiou et des Hioung-Nou avec les Turcs” Paris 1925
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@IdelUralState
"The Etruscans, the inhabitants of the greater part of Italy, were a Turanian people, migrating from Asia Minor about Etruria [...]."
(American architect and architecture , Bände 33-34, The American architect, 1891, p.134)
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@IdelUralState
“We gather from this language (especially from the known numerals) that they were of Altaic, or Turanian, stock, like their Asiatic neighbours the Hittites and Kati.”
(J. G. R. Forlong, Encyclopedia of Religions or Faiths of Man, Teil 2, Kessinger Publishing, 2003, p.72)
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@IdelUralState
“Among the clearest philological indications are the use of postpositions and agglutination, with words such as [...], . . .
+ Tarkon 'chief' (the Hittite Tarkhun, Turkish Tarkhan),
+ Idus 'full moon' (Akkadian "idu", Turkish "yede" means "moon", "month'"), [...],
+ Clan 'son' (Turkish "oglan" means "boy"),
+ Avil 'life' (Turkish "ol" or "varol" means "to be"),
+ and 'Charún' (Turkish "Khar-un" means "evil god") [...].”
[...]
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@IdelUralState
(J. G. R. Forlong, Encyclopedia of Religions or Faiths of Man, Teil 2, Kessinger Publishing, 2003, p.72)
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@IdelUralState
"Nothing can prove more clearly the Turanian origin of the Etruscans than the fact that all we know of them is derived from their TOMBS."
(James Fergusson, A history of architecture in all countries, J. Murray, 1865, p.257)
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@IdelUralState
“In the Etruscan confederacy of 12 cities each king was independent, and all were allied for war-an universal Turanian custom which we may trace among Hittites, Akkadians, and non-Aryans in India. [...] [The word Vol appears to be the Turkish aul. and Akkadian alu, for a 'camp' or 'city'].”
(J. G. R. Forlong, Encyclopedia of Religions or Faiths of Man, Teil 2, Kessinger Publishing, 2003, p.74)
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@IdelUralState
(Part 1)
The names of the gods of Etruria are explained by Dr. Isaac Taylor, and others, by aid of Turanian languages. Tina, the sky spirit (Tatar Turkish Tin), Summano (Mongol Sumans, Lapp Tuman, 'holy'), Usil, the rising sun (Finnic, Usal, Asal, 'morning' or Turkish Işil 'light' or 'bright'), Tushna, the midday sun (Tatar Turkish Tus ''south), Janus, the god of creation [...] (Tatar Turkish Jen 'god'), [...]
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@IdelUralState
(Part 2)
Sethluns was Vulcan (from Set or Süt, Turkic, 'to burn'), Sancus was a Sabine god (Akkadian San, Turkish Sang, 'mighty'), Thana was Diana (Tatar Turkish Tan 'light' or Yacut/Sakha Turkish ting 'dawn'). [...] The Lares were spirits, as were the Penates (Tatar Turkish ban, 'spirit')."
(J. G. R. Forlong, Encyclopedia of Religions or Faiths of Man, Teil 2, Kessinger Publishing, 2003, pp.75-76)
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@IdelUralState
Everytime when I read such comments as you wrote, I fall in harm.
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago
@xxnecspenecmetuxx
And btw in that time Greeks did not existed, the first time when they appeared was with the name "Yavana" from South Asia. They were nomads, or rather noble horseman.
Furthermore, see for Assyrian and Sumerian "Kil Tablets":
Turuku 2100 bc (Eastern Anatolia, Mesopotamia)
Turki 2250 bc (Eastern Anatolia)
IdelUralState 2 weeks ago 3
les russes sont etrusques
paienne14 1 month ago
A greta history professor once said. "History would be great if only it were true". Referring to the propensity of historians to view the results of their findings through their own world perspective. A common mistake and one that can happen even when you try hard to avoid it. It's the nature of history. We must sometimes look deeper to reveal the truth.
geezerdombroadcast 1 month ago
@geezerdombroadcast ATATURK ALSO SAID IF THE HISTORY WRITERS ARE NOT LOYAL TO THE MAKERS OF THE HISTORY, THE REALITY BECAMES SO ABSURD THAT COMES BACK TO HIT US WITH AN UNRECOGNIZABLE ASPECT.
The17thstar 1 month ago
Oh my God are we realy serious; "the west is hiding the truth"? Please give me a break. There have certainly been some despicable fools and egotistical idiots who claimed to be scientists and archeologists. There have been many racist and outrageous lies told in the past. The reality of modern scientific techniques is such that the kind of zenophobic rascist lies that were typical of the early 20th and 19th centuries are very unlikely to pass muster for long today. It's rediculous.
geezerdombroadcast 2 months ago
@geezerdombroadcast I must agree with you. I am sorry for my past disrespectful mistakes. However, old italian schoolars in the beginning of the 20th century even denied an Etruscan origin of the Latin Civilization. Now everything is becoming clear. I will publish a new video in a few days about the Etruscans. There will be serious academic quotations from modern times regarding the Turanian character of the Etruscans.
IdelUralState 1 month ago
Very interesting you are in my favorites now
2prissyful 3 months ago
Ita Tmia Ikak Heramasva Vatiexe uniala stres temisa tuta Tefarei Velianaš šal Kluveniaš turuke. Munistaš tuyaš Tamereška ilakve TULE RASE !
now please Turk nationalists. This sentence IS Rasen (Etruscan). You probably 100% or at least 50 % understand it, correct?
VendPrekmurec 3 months ago
@VendPrekmurec I have a question, from which side did you transcipt, from right or left?
IdelUralState 2 months ago
@YiannisThiakos the continuity of greek peoples is a national myth invented in the 19th century. Athens was a small town of less than 50,000 people the majority of which spoke arnavitika. Modern greek is a language like Israeli Hebrew or Esperanto, invented as a national need. People of greece today are nothing more than a mish mash of thousands of years of genetic gifting from invading men. Deal with it.
zuikos 4 months ago
@zuikos well there was continuity in ancient greek in the trabzon area. my family is from there they speak romeyka very ancient greek.
MrReoNetro 3 months ago
European facist governments wont accept that although they know the truth.But it is proved that Turks were living in Anatolia 15000years ago,before sumerians,urartu, hittite or greek civilizations.They immigrated to asia,they have already been using alphabet,their lives were democratic,even women were superior in many cases.Then they came back to anatolia their own lands again. Thats why Etrucians are related to Turks.We are anatolian and asian people not white, european or arabic.
zzeynepp18 5 months ago
Turkish identity shaped during 500 AD. Even if the Huns or those Turks came from invented the Writing for Europe that doesn't mean The Huns were Turks. These step people covered such a large area that defiately from one area to anther they were two distinct ethnicites. Linguistic similarities don't even prove that Turks are direct decendants of huns, even the Ugure turks. Agulatative languages were spoken even in ancient near east. But, this way of classifying languages doesn't proof genetics.
livingdream1234 5 months ago
@livingdream1234
"And the Huns, with their allied population, were Turk also."
(Sir William Smith; Dictionary of Greek and Roman geography, Band 1;Little, Brown & Co., 1854, page1097)
IdelUralState 5 months ago 5
Another one I have heard was that Ururtian near Armenia was an Agulutative language. This one is definately not tolurable.
Not that I don't share common ancestory with Turks or huns. I sure am blood brother to pigmies from Africa. No offence.
livingdream1234 5 months ago
It is plausable to say most of the European population originated from southern Russia into Urals, and baltic, north of black sea. But, All the population weren't turks. Turks are branched from those poppulation with their distinct genetics. It doesn't mean Turks are hun of the same sub-ethnic origin. Huns from chinese region must of been as different racially to the huns near black sea as Dravidians are from Indo-Europeans. This video has Extreme view.
livingdream1234 5 months ago
Runic alphabet was used by Germanics and Turks claim its theirs. Maybe the Viking ship designs were taken from Turks also. And lets say the Etruscans were from Huns, are Turks really from huns?
The mega huns group were all over the Russian steps, a large area. How could they all belong to Turkic group. Their genetic makeup varried widely from east to west and from North to South.
We all are blood brothers to African pigmy. This is not a coinsidence.
This video is'nt convincing.
livingdream1234 5 months ago
languages. DUTCH:GELUK ENG:LUCK. GERMAN: GLUCK in Turkish its Güllük.
DUTCH:MENEER= TR: MEN ER( iam a man) You can go whole day with lists like this Just with ANAGRAM technices you can find the Turkish word. ANAGRAM= oNu GiRAM(breaking a word) They tried to vanish all Turkish traces during rennaissance.
TRANSLATE= TR-AN-LAT-E=TERSANLAT. They couldnt make a new language of their own so they just changed the structure of the word! coincedence that i find the same word with the same meaning NOOOOO
Mertt03 5 months ago
Even Latin,Greek,European words are from Turkic origin.
For example TRUe=TogRU /ADVERT=AD VERTi/ AQUA= AKiyO/ GLADIATOR= AGLADI TOR/ ONCE= önce/ ACCIDENT=AKSI EDENTi (remarkeble you write it different but pronounce it like in Turkic) GATHER=GETIR/ GENESIS= GUNES IZ(SUN symbol of the christians!) HOSTILe= HOS TEIL/ PLAN=yaPiLAN/ NAME=NAMi/ WARRIOR=VURIYOR/ BROTHER=BiRADER/ CRISIS=CARESIS/ INCIDENT=icitend(i)/ DEFAULT=DEF OLTu These are examples of the english language this is possible with all
Mertt03 5 months ago 8
@Mertt03 such a bs.
ok, we get it.
Europe is turkish hahahahahah! Is this what you want to say?
Suikastify 4 months ago
Truth: Latin=veritas, Eng. Origin from W.Saxon=tríewþ, tréowþ, trýwþ; advert is a contraction for advertisement, doesn't work; Aqua: seems to suggest a proto-Indo-European language, doesn't tell us from where; Gladiator: This is a Turkic neo-logism, adopted from Latin roots; once: Old English ānes from Old Saxon enes . . . as I look at this more, I'm getting curious about where you got your information from.
yichengyi 1 month ago
@yichengyi
In Turkic 'Aqua' is 'akmak' and means "to flow".
In Turkic 'once' is 'önce' and means "before".
IdelUralState 1 month ago
@yichengyi BY THE WAY WHERE DO YOU GET THE WORD "PROTO INDO EUROPEAN" FROM FOR GODS SAKE. CAN YOU PLEASE PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT IS THIS WORD AND CAN YOU GIVE ME AN EXAMPLE OF THAT LANGUAGE. WHAT IS SAXON? NEOLOGISMS OR NAIVE COMPARISON ARE ON OF THE STRONGEST INSTRUMENTS OF TRUE CIENTISTS ALSO. CHECK THE MARSILIANA TABLET AND YOU WILL SEE THAT THE ORIGIN OF LATIN IS ETRUSCAN 'OKUKUPULT" WHICH MEANS ALPHABET BUT IT WAS READ FROM RIGHT TO LEFT. LOOK EAST. LEARN PROTO TURKISH. READ FROM RIGHT TO LEFT.
The17thstar 1 month ago
@Mertt03 Etrüsklerin Türk kökenli olduğu doğru olabilir ama İngilizcedeki sözcükler Türkçeye o kadar benzeyemez çünkü Modern İngilizce bir Hint-Avrupa dilidir ve eski İngilizce Türkçeye benzemez
Nirvana368 1 month ago
@Nirvana368 Yaniliyorsun, Germen halklari eskiden resmen Kipchak idi, Altay dil ailesine mensupdular. Bunu biz demiyoruz, kendileri ARTIK söylüyorlar!
Bir kac örnek daha:
money - 'manat' (para)
sterling - 'sytyr' veya 'sytyrling' (ölçü birimi)
penny - 'peneg' (kücük para)
Bundan ötesi Hint-Avrupa Dil Ailesi 2009 amerikada iki franziz bilim adamlarindan cürütüldü!
IdelUralState 1 month ago
@IdelUralState DOSTUM BEN 2000 DE PARIS BILIMSEL ARASTIRMA MERKEZININ EYLUL BULTENIYLE CURUTULDU SANIYORDUM HINT AVRUPA TEORISININ. AMA YINE BU AYNI KURULUSUN 19. YY SONLARINDADA BULTENLER YAYINLAYIP TA O ZAMANLAR HINT AVRUPA KURAMININ SAVURMA OLDUGUNU IFADE EDIP SUPHELERINI ORTAYA KOYMUSLARDI. VIDEOLARINI BEGENIYLE TAKIP EDIYORUM.
The17thstar 1 month ago
america mean in turk language pussy of erica but turks never tease with this.
1905GALATASARAYY 6 months ago
Super..GOD BLESS AND PROTECT TURKS
basbugataturk01 7 months ago
The Etruscans? Pah, a bunch of hedonists that make the Cretans look genteel, and it even shows in their disgusting religion. If the West is and was primitive, Altai-Buryat horsethieves were even more so. Say hello to the Afrocentrists for me... xD
NKVism3 7 months ago
Thank You for Sharing, Saved!!
kind regards, DTimberley ♥ *✿♪♫ ♥ HoOOWwwwL *✿♪♥♫ ♥
DTimberley 7 months ago
KAZAK ALFABETI!!! IT ELI = IT ALY = DOG MENS!!!
BayKhanSultan 7 months ago
@BayKhanSultan Znachit li chto nibud' nazvanie ''KOLASIN BAR'' ?
MrViTopol 6 months ago
If West takes an ancient civilization as "mysterious people, unreadable scripts, not understand their language..so on"..be sure they were Turkish. On the other hand West can decipher Dolphin's language and can publish Dolphinian Dictionary.
West is just disgusting!!!!!
deeptuber109 7 months ago
Egypt would like to have a word with you
MegaRabbitPower 8 months ago
@MegaRabbitPower I would rather say agglutinative speaker nations in the past and in the present would like to have a word with the fusional speaker nations of today.
Btw 84 Egyptian hieroglyphs are in origin Turkic Runes (Tamğa).
IdelUralState 8 months ago
i was on eupedia.com i saw genetic of europe central italy and turkish as big thing in common only big différence was r1b.
randomguyalwayshere 8 months ago
Professor Mario Alinei says the etruscan language was uralic, from Carpathian Basin. Etruscan runes and hungarian runes are same in 75%
In my opinion the etruscans were sumerians. Our city Esztergom is sumerian named from Isztergam. Iszter is Danube, Gam is elbow in english. Esztergom is a city of danube-bank. The toscanian people are J2, E3b so anatolian-middle easterns. Or troyans? Etruscans had boats and troyans too.
HungarianHistory 8 months ago
@HungarianHistory then you'll might watch my video about my reading of Rasen ("etruscan") inscriptions... I can read also many Hungarian words through Slavonic language without a problem. Reason? Let's say "we" once lived together in great state called Tartaria - old Aryan Russia before western "historians" stole our history...
VendPrekmurec 7 months ago
@VendPrekmurec in britannica it wrotes as rasena which same with in Turkish asena in the same meaning of she-wolf. thay are purely Turkish no european, no greek, no armenian. even their rulers have the title of tarkan which is also Turkish. their first sculpture before bastardization with italians are with mongoloid eyes and round heads. I saw them.even whole italian dna is nnot same with them but only the ones in Etruria and Turks match them. not greeks, not armenians. they are not aryan.
Igotangry 7 months ago
@HungarianHistory SUMERIANS ARE ALSO Turks
basbugataturk01 7 months ago
Respond to this video... pOOR EUROPIANS WE ARE ALL YOUR FATHER
basbugataturk01 7 months ago
TURANIAN: EUROPE!
EUROPEAN: WHAT?
TURANIAN : I'M YOUR FATHER!!!
EUROPEAN : NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO...OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
randomguyalwayshere 8 months ago
agglutinative folks: sumer (pre ural - altaic), elamite (pre altaic),kartwelian, dravida, basqu,etruscan, subartuan (pre uralic=hurrian, sabir, magyar, mada (mitanni-median)), hun (massagethe, thyssagethe, scythian,saka,eftalite,xiongnu),chus (assyr, uzes, kassite,khazar, osseth (alanian), osman), avar (uar-hun, bactrian,parni, parthian, persian (turanian line), daha-tochar (dacian-thracian)(tchi, yuezhi, tahó,sarmatian), pannon (parsee scythian)
HungarianHistory 9 months ago
AND THE TURKS GOT IT FROM THE MIGHTY CHICKEN!,,,,,,OR COULD IT BE FROM THE ANCIENT KHEMET( AEGYPT,COPTS)?
1ITOPIA 9 months ago
@1ITOPIA The first Aegyptian Hieroglyphs are involving 84 Tamğas (Turkish Runes). Turkish Runic system is the origin of writing system.
IdelUralState 9 months ago
Turn it around, what if it was Proto-Latin that came to the turks?
Ascensiam 9 months ago
@Ascensiam Thank you for this advice. So you mean how the Etruscan-like writing system came to Central Asia? Good question. Do you know something about this ?
IdelUralState 9 months ago
@Ascensiam what would make them move to east, steps?? %90 of ural-altaic ppl moved to west bcz there wasnt enough food, farming was not available there. europe knows about Huns and Mongols only. but there were more, like fins and estons, turks, scythians and even bulgars. native americans also belong to this orgin, so they all wanted to leave central asia...
karteorhan 6 months ago
if Kazim Mirsan is wrong why non of the scientist from europ proof the opposite they even can not say that Kazim Mirsan is wrong, if it is so easy then proof it, here you are
halilnas 9 months ago
West never ever accept those theories. Ancient Greek was their foundation... It was some kind of Star Wars effect. For a more than millenia there where Turkish barbarians and this was saying....
I'm your father West...
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
delifisektuxedo 10 months ago 2
Um...That alpah bet is strikingly similar to that of Phoenician and hebrew
ave383 10 months ago
can some one tell me, if altaic peoples became turcic around XIII century a.d., how come in this video they're claimed to be turcic at 700b.c. its like 2000 years difference?
besides, turkish and other "turcic" people are totally different ethnical groups.
ThatSovietRussia 11 months ago
Bro, the west will NEVER accept a Turkic origin for the Etruscans, it would mess up their whole western oriented, indo-european view of history. I read a year or so back an Italian report linking the Etruscans with Turks and a DNA study of some Italians and Turks showed remarkable similarities.
Mind you i'm not making any 'crazy claims'. Europeans will never accept that there is more to civilization than them, especially regarding Ural-Altaics. True, we were nomads, but that's not all.
Ekimoglu 11 months ago 14
@Ekimoglu Yes this is true Bro, but it is much more sad that they will forever deny their Turkic roots the whole life. What a shame, isn't it ?
IdelUralState 11 months ago 3
@Ekimoglu You are absolutely right. The west would take it as an insult to relate Etruscans to Turkic origin. Past three centuries they are leading the game which empowered them to write the history based on their streotypes and religious motives. The questions is not "Would that ever change" but when?
wolftaylan 10 months ago
@Ekimoglu When you say the west you include the areas above central and northern europe too. And they are not turkic.
GodOfUnbelief 5 months ago
Excellent !!!
metetrus 11 months ago
Etruscans is Anatolian, from Lidyan ( Pelasgy, but not Greces). as i know Etruscans come from Scumers from Mesopotamia, becouse also i am from Scumer DNA R1 & R2 it is same peoples,
likamebonia17 11 months ago
Etruscans is Anatolian, from Lidyan ( Pelasgy, but not Greces). as i know Etruscans come from Scumers from Mesopotamia, becouse also i am from Scumer DNA R1 & R2 it is same peoples, i am Caucasus-Iberian ( wite race,black sea), firsty proto-Iberians is Etruscs, Basque & Iberians= it is one race. .. e .t
likamebonia17 11 months ago
@likamebonia17 Dude you know nothing. Because Etruscans are not identified genetically. There is no DNA from grave found.Etruscans are known through their cultural clues to Romans and Greeks. There is a theory of Etruscans in Aegean Sea and Italian Peninsula so as to explain some unspecified (in Past) artifacts and traditions of the Romans and Greeks that were common even before they met each other. But no one knows if it was a distictive tribe or a mixture og Aegean and Micrasiatic people :)
YiannisThiakos 10 months ago
i don't know you..but thank you for making this video. They are facts of history which we never forget.. if you interested you can read Sinan Meydan and M. Kemal Atatürk's research of Lost Continental of MU. Of course there is James Churchward's Lost Continental of MU too.
İ'm Türk. And i proud... We are not saying whole world is Turk. We are saying Turks are one of the oldest civilization on planet earth.
thank you again for video..have nice day
BTW, i'm sorry, my english not perfect.
tasagraf 11 months ago
You are ignoring the primogenitor: The Phoenician Alphabet.
Surah72 11 months ago
Etruscans werent türks but sumerian immigrants , the genetic contact with the anatolians the anatolian and not the asian! all folks have common people and ruler DNA, the pre-türks have sumerian elamite ruler classes and altaian common people, today türks have anatolian common under oghur rulers!
HungarianHistory 11 months ago 3
democrasy ,metallurgy, alphabet, architecture ALL GREEK WORDS ...that are fouNd in modern turkish language AS GREEK WORDS AGAIN!!...if these things are turkic inventions then why they have only a GREEK WORD TO INTERPRETE AND DEFINE THEM?
IF ALPHABET ITSELF IS A TURKIC INVENTION THEN WHY THE FIRST TWO LETTERS OF THE GREEK ALPHABET ARE ALPHA AND BETA? OTTOMANS AND SELJUCS DID NOT HAVE THEIR OWN ALPHABET THEY HAD THE ARABIC TILL ATATURK ADAPTED THE LATIN ALPHABET..(WHICH DERIVES FROM THE GREEK)
ElectraofMaced0n 1 year ago
@ElectraofMaced0n Well, it is this kind of thinking leads you to the same strange place this guy has started from; meaning all culture etc is of Greek origin!! Which is not. Take for example: the Greek alphabet was taken from the Phoenicians, so that's why, the names of aleph, beth, gimmel etc. do have a meaning in the semitic langauges like Hebrew and Arabic (Beth and Bait= house). Saying that Turks did not have their alphabet before the current one does not make sense for this fact for once.
okeAnous 11 months ago
@ElectraofMaced0n Latin alphabet that derives from Greek does that make any sense? Latin is one form and Greek is another form so each developed each other?
TheTurkishFalcon 11 months ago
There are some new theories in the last ten years,
that is sure that during the ice age and after there were a neolitic culture in Europe centered it to the Charpatian Basin. These people invented the writing, the animal traction, the wheel, aht bronz etc. They are the acsestor of the etrusks and also the mezopotamian culture. Probably together with the mezopotamian the stepp as also used by these people founding the scythians. All used the same writings. The turks,chineses learned it later.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
This is a load of crap, the Etruscans are more ancient that the "Turkic" people, there was no such thing as "Turkic languages" by the time Etruscans existed.
Arabastai 1 year ago
Cok güzel bir paylsim Kardesim .
Devamlarini bekleriz.
Alabay77 1 year ago
The Etruscans were a Turanian people, they were definitely not Indo-Europeans. The Etruscans are Trojans who landed in Western Italy in Tuscany after the Fall of Troy. The Etruscans founded Rome, and the last king of Rome was a Etruscan named Tarquinnous Superbus. Roman architecture, religion, and culture was Etruscan in nature. Romans worshiped household gods and ancestors.
He101A 1 year ago
@He101A The etrusks were a side shot of the Charpatian Basin centered european neolitic culture.
These people were definite not indo-europeans beacuse the runic writing they developed, were fit to the aglitunative lenguage speaking people, like the hungarain, finn, hun, scythian, turk. The writing is in sinergy with the spoken lenguage. Search on the net: "Hungarian rovas" and you will see that the rovás is streight descendant from this writing, and most similar to the etrusks.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
There was no turks yet in BC!
The Etruscan very easy readable by current Russian.
Russian was the first language of human civilization.
The word Russia stands up for "race".
The first colony of race people landed in Ural Mountains current Russia, began to mix up with local people - cavemen, climate was subtropical. Later on when climate got colder with Ice Age they went to south, south-east, west, diverting the basic language. Iindoeuropean prolanguage was simply almost current Russian.
lmhitar 1 year ago
@lmhitar the proto turks were somewhere in Mongolia 2000 years ago, and they learned the runic writings simlar to the chineses from the scythian-huns.
The turkey people are driven to false way thanks for the similarity of the writing, but they do not concern the time...the chronology.
The etrusks lenguage was not indo eruropean like the russian is..... They have nothing to do with the slavs.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
how do you know all this IdelUralState?
JonathanGiann 1 year ago
@JonathanGiann I read Haluk Tarcan :)
IdelUralState 1 year ago
COOOK GÜZEL, ELLERINE SAGLIK, DEVAMINI DILERIM, KOLAY GELSIN
ustura2009 1 year ago
The Etruscans came from Anatolia, not Central Asia. You are not Turkic, you are Turkish. Few people in Turkey are of Turkic descent, the vast majority of Turks are a cocktail of Mediterranean lineages. Your DNA does not lie.
joseffritzlismydaddy 1 year ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy
Central Asia -> Anatolia -> Balkan -> Greece and Italy
This is the right root, our linguistic Inscriptions AND genetical roots does not lie, as well. I am even going much further and say "the whole globe" is of Turkic descend.
IdelUralState 1 year ago 3
@joseffritzlismydaddy yuuh listen anatolia is the home of turks for thousands of years.Moreover turks migrate to middle east, balkan, caucasia anatolia for thousands of years.Even in 1071 millions of oguz turks migrated to anatolia,caucasia,iran and middle east you brainfucked stupid shit.So if majority of turkey is not turkic who the fuck is then turkic you foolish bastard? The few genetic research made by devious motherfuckers who try to fool turks are the last fucking fake shit.
IslaMohammed1453 1 year ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy Not true. In Anatolia even Christian communities not mixed by each other. Armenians and Greeks even have not become cocktail. They lived for centuries separate under their own patriaches (Thanks to Ottomans and Seldjuks) Jews have always been on their own. Other races came before were 80% Turkic anyhow..like Lydians, Karians, Frigians.. the rest were Greek colonies once they came and left Anatolia totally in 1922 for good.
deeptuber109 1 year ago
@deeptuber109 Funny, racist idea. "Mixing with each other" was not by interracial marriages. It was mainly by mass conversion of religion. Even 100 years ago it happened. Even today there are many ppl with a hybrid-religion and their identities are fading away.There is no accusation to any country. Greece and Balkan nations did the same. They chased away Balkan Turks during Balkan wars. They either hided their identity (if possible), ran away or died.80000 ppl were arriving to Anatolia daily.
frsn4 1 year ago
@frsn4 What mass conversion of religion? What you talking about? In exchange of population only Turks moved to Anatolia. Islam converted Serbs stayed in their land. They sill there ..in Bosnia, Herzegovina, Kosova.. etc.
If your words were true.. we Turks would have been Arabs now as we all converted from Shamanism to Islam.
Race mixture is not an easy thing. You and your kind recently pumping this funny story;
- Turks in Anatolia are not real Turks.
Bullshit !!!!
deeptuber109 1 year ago
@deeptuber109 How do know what is a real Turk ??
A Turk is a Turk its in are blood we know who we are.MORON
ruh1000 1 year ago
@ruh1000 Turks are carying nearly all types of Genes. So what is characteristic for us ?
IdelUralState 1 year ago 3
@ruh1000 If you are not able to understand what you read.. don't write hereshowing your stupidity.
Turk is in our blood..agree but I believe your brain is in your ass.. biggest moron of all !!!!
deeptuber109 1 year ago
@deeptuber109 only one here that is stupid is you..
ruh1000 1 year ago
@deeptuber109 i'm sorry but if the turks in anatolia were pure "turks" by race, we would have slant eyes but we dont lol anyway some of the converted societies kept their identities i know, but after balkan wars many non turkish muslims arrived to anatolia, now most of them dont have their slavic identities, that's what i mean. today the exact number of albanians in turkey is not known. most of them have turkish identity. perhaps you should read more
frsn4 11 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy Anatolia was dead my friend and stayed dead with the world during that geologic disaster so called ice age for 56.000 yrs. 14.000 BC is the date for Great Migrations that all sourced from Central Asia plateau to Europe and Anatolia and some blacks from Victoria /Africa to Europe.
Lydians..father of Etruscans were pure Turkic nation as West say.. we don't know them, we can't read their scripts as they say same for Etruscans. West better say.. we don't want to know them.
deeptuber109 1 year ago
@deeptuber109 Dude. Since your language is a simplex of Arabic, Altaic and greek with french acccent. This is the reason why you can read as you say, the etruscan plates. Dont you see it is clear? I can use a turkic scientific word to explain this to you, "HISTORY". Or esle i can use an other turk word, "MUSIKi" to help you inderstand etruscan more easily... hahahahahahahaha there are many turkic word in Aegean history I see now, I am so sorry :D hahahahaha
YiannisThiakos 10 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy ...this is told from western cocksuckers.But the truth is anatolia is the home of turks for thousands of years.There are countless migrations to anatolia.The last migration was after 1071.This was only one part of migration.The migration of turks starts in central asia.And turks spread all over europe,asia, america.PS: The DNA was applied on some guys in some parts of turkey we dont actually know.Moreover these tests are made by western and their intensions are well known.
NothingWithoutALLAH 1 year ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy The vast majority of turkey is turk.This can not be denied.Millions of turkey moved to anatolia, balkan middle east, iran, caucasia, wolga....And we are here for thousands of years.But you can not know.Ever wondered?You get feed with lies.And so far you have hidden turkss history.But true history is coming back and it will come on you motherfuckers to be honest.Lies got short legs.
NothingWithoutALLAH 1 year ago
@NothingWithoutALLAH There is no hidden turk history. On the contrary, the first Neo turks had to join a no-nation-state together so as not to collapse from its majotiry that were many minorities. So they changed and used myths and stories from there cultures so as to make a fake story to be tought same to all children in the new states schools, do not forget internet was not common those days:D.And what was happening in Deap Anatolia was not easily tought to the west.
YiannisThiakos 10 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy : There is no Turkic race. Turks were a combination of many different races. Turks were in Anatolia before there was a Roman Empire.
ancalimonungol 1 year ago
@ancalimonungol Battle of Manzikert (1071) was a landmark for Turkic migration to Anatolia. You think Turks were in Anatolia long before the Roman Empire???
frsn4 1 year ago
@ancalimonungol yanlisin var kardes türk irki diye bir sey var fakat türkler büyük bir bölgeye uzun zaman önce bile yayildigi icin baska milletlerle temas olmustur fakat bu türkleri türklükten cikarmaz gördügün gibi dünyada 250 milyon türk var.Bazi türklerde baska milletlerle karisma söz konusu olsa bile iclerindeki bir damla türk kani yüregini alevlendirir.Türklerin Ana yurdu mu kitasi hesaba katilmadiginda orta asyadir.Ordan anadoluya cok önceden gelmislerdir herkesten önce.Yazili belgeler var
NothingWithoutALLAH 1 year ago
@ancalimonungol there is no such thing as a mongol by the way
199219931994S 1 year ago
@ancalimonungol Before Roman Empire We were at anatolia. We have tamga and symbols at all anotolia. Scientists says that they are here since 7000 years at rocks.. They are turkic tamgas.
metetrus 11 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy 1 cell or 1 atom of Turkish origin is enough you to be a Turkish...my friend,,, BEING TURKISH IS NOT A MATTER OF RACE THERE IS NOT SUCH A THING CALLED RACE ...BEING A TURK IS THE SENSE AND IF YOU HAVE THAT SENSE STRONG THEN YOU ARE A TURK
foxserkan 1 year ago
@foxserkan I am not racist, but... Only if you belong to no race, and you know it, you can easily say that this you said. Race is a matter of genetics but also is a matter of choise. Race is also concluded by its culture (if they have) and civilization (most races had no civilization, civilization and culture are not the same thing you know).For Example the European and American World are a continous of Roman and Greek Civilizations, but doesnt mean that they belong to that race, right?
YiannisThiakos 10 months ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy agree 100%. i read the research article about etruscan dna being closest to today's turkish ppl's dna. there is a small number of ppl with relatively pure turkic dna, they live on mountains and isolated areas
frsn4 1 year ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy Well noone of us and serious people cares about your senseless comment.Anatolia is the home of turks for at least 12.000 years.You want evidence ? There are countless alone in anatolia over 5000 turk' scripts (turkish tamgas) you can not read because you are not a turk but a scum maybe a cocktail you mentioned before ? If Anatolia is not turks then the world is not humans you moron it can not be any obvious.The time is running for turks.Truths will be accepted anyways.
JanissaryMTF 1 year ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy
Tyr-->Scandinavian God
Tyrk-->Turk
TheMaotun 1 year ago
@joseffritzlismydaddy Ottomans were very careful not to mix the race. During their reign even Greeks and Armenians, 2 Christian races couldn't have the chance to mix. Our Sultans founded 2 separate Patriarchs and kept them live in their communities. The reason was simple to understand; Not to loose Turkish fighting spirit. Janissaries were kept separate and were not allowed to get married until retirement. If they have a boy, he was to be a Janissary as well. So no cocktail here dude.
deeptuber109 1 year ago
@deeptuber109 you are a fool, ottomans mixed with every muslim possible. you are speaking about early turks, gokturks for example
199219931994S 1 year ago
@deeptuber109 This is a lie. The conqueror of Constantinopole was of Greek blood and the muslim architect Sina was total greek and they also both spoke greek. All Turk musques are coppies of Greek churches and arab mosques. Ottomans were not a blood line they were a governing "Gate" or however you call it. The guy with most power and money rulled the rest palace. And people withh greek blood were famous till 1800's when turks started the big clearance killing or arresting greeks for silly reason
YiannisThiakos 10 months ago
ALL IS TRUE. THANKS A LOT
TANRI TURKU YUCE YARATMIS. TURK KENDISINI KAYP ETMEMILIDIR!
Azerbaycan 1 year ago
However, Phoenicians have their origins from interior Asia as they immigrated to Minor Asia from Northern Caspian sea region as Avars did later.
Troya Phoenician and Etrusks may definitely have Turkic origins. Consider the Kokturk alphabet used in Orkhun texts. And similar words used in Summeria.
Turks build huge pyramides in Macunzhuang China similar to the ones in North Africa and South America.
oztiryaki1 1 year ago
I agree there.I am a Cepni Turk even our ancient alphabet is simmilar to the Etruscian letters.
Connatural 1 year ago
@ Chincilla
I'm nog agree with you. It couldnt and it's NOT true. The Alphabet is from the Etruscan origin. The origins of the Greeks are the balkans. The balkan came about 5.000 BC from Asia. But the Etruscans came 14.000 years ago from Asia to Turkey. The Etruscans couldnt translated in latin or greek. The alphabet can translate Only in kazak language and other Turkic languages.
DonGiovanni008 1 year ago
@MegaPagon ruski alhpabet = Latin + Turkic Orhin Runes from Asia
IdelUralState 1 year ago 2
@IdelUralState True...I see the sharing of cultural language here. Russian aplhabet = is latin + turkic, agreeable. Roots point to a turkic origin is obvious here. I don't think the phonecian came up with it, maybe borrowing from east to west as they migrated into eastern europe. It is definitely can be traced to the Runes in Kazak and is of Turkic origin. This is the most plausible proof...
ahmonguniform 1 year ago
Haha, some of those Turanians look quite like me, my heritage is western Chinese, Korean and English. As for the details of this video, it's highly likely that the Etruscans had Turkic heritage, but the point about the alphabet is untrue. The alphabet of the Etruscans and early Latin alphabet (Cumae alphabet) came from a long line of writing systems which were begat by the Proto-Greek alphabet, which came from Phoenician – you can trace it back to Cuneiform and Hieroglyphs after that.
chinchilla2302 1 year ago
@chinchilla2302 This very true.
IdelUralState 1 year ago
Allah yardimcimiz olsun mel'unlara garshi.
calismada yaxsi olmush
sag olun
JanissaryMTF 1 year ago
there antolianns hittites not altaic people
younusih 1 year ago
@younusih
Indo"Europeans" does not exist ...
IdelUralState 1 year ago 26
@IdelUralState batiya göre bütün dünya indo-german
ya rabbi bu indo-germanda neyse artik
bozuk birsey olmasi gerek...
ideluralstate emeklerine saglik
insallah devamini bekliyoruz
dogrulari haykirmamiz gerek hangi sekilde olursa olsun
ramazan bayramin müberak olsun (geciktim biraz) ;(
Turqashgai 1 year ago
@IdelUralState Indo Europeans is a lie
sn00piedog 1 year ago
w ww.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/jun/18/italy.johnhooper
The enigma of Italy's ancient Etruscans is finally unravelledDNA tests on their Italian descendants show the 'tuscii' came from Turkey
alnllc 1 year ago
Turks are not even hominid, they come from an ancient race of aliens known as the fullofshitians, who were known throughout the universe as a people who stole all knowledge and claimed it as their own on youtube videos. It is rumored that they may be related to the black Hebrew Israelites, however they come from a reptilian race, so pending future dna sequencing studies, it will be hard to tell.
DefenceSpeech 1 year ago
Holy shit ? Really ? I never heard of this "fullofshitians". Where do they came from ? Would you like to tell me more about this ? Are there scientific studies about it ? I am a little bit confused, because I always thought that Atatürk was Hitlers ideal.
IdelUralState 1 year ago
@IdelUralState Without a doubt Hitler took interest in many leaders throughout history, that does not mean he respects Turkish people, or their culture. I am glad that these nationalist movements are spreading across the world, but people need to quit making up fake history to make their race look like it is without flaw. If there is a master race, it is definitely not Turkish, and and definitely is not European either.
DefenceSpeech 1 year ago
I understand your racial position, but Turks are not representative for any race on this earth. Being a Turk is being a member of a Culture an not a race, there is no turkish race. We can be europid, mongoloid and negrid. "Turk" (Turuk) means "in God believing man" and has its origin in Tengrism (Shamanism). And btw the only country which Hitler did not wanted to attack was the Turkish Republic, because of the "aryan" leader Ataturk and his nationalistic ideal.
IdelUralState 1 year ago
@DefenceSpeech We all know as a historical fact that after world's 56.000 years of ice age Great migrations sourced from Central Asia to all over the world. Regretfully some tribes mixed up with orangutans escaped from the heat and draught of Africa to Europe.. So I suggest don't pay attention to history books written by those monkeys. Modern archeology tells us clear about master race, master culture, alphabet and civilization. . you can digest or not.. the name is "TURK"
deeptuber109 1 year ago
@deeptuber109 thanks for the laugh, you made my night.
DefenceSpeech 1 year ago
@DefenceSpeech Yeah.. one feels happy as the truth learned and yet to come more. We're just starting to reveal.. so my dear better save your energy for future panics.
deeptuber109 1 year ago
@IdelUralState A person who has full of shit.. presents here only shit from the only organ functions at him.. so better let him in his garbage.. he stinks!
This their culture as they even deny the immaculate DNA works of world famous American, Italian, Spanish universities and go by their grandma's stories about Turks. According to them 16 great Turkic empires created by barbarians!.. Real shit is this.
Thank you IdilUralState for your great work to enlighten the hidden history of Turks.
deeptuber109 1 year ago
Im not interested in races, bur it is very possible that Etruscans have a relationship with prototurks or maybe they were prototurcs. their name may come from é turusuc which means "I am turusuq". it is just like Turkmen. but there is a disinformation about Rome. they were not the succeeder of etruscans. they were a different group but they copied Etruscans and paganism. because of that they adopted the pagan culture of Etruscans. thats why the wolf figure in rome and turks are the same.
ozkanbur 1 year ago
WE ARE ONE PEOPLE! THE PEOPLE OF URAL-ALTAIC. THE PEOPLE OF TURAN!
The children of the people of the Scythians and Huns!
We are brothers and sisters!
We are the descendants of our Turan ancestors and we are brothers!
No foreign nation can turn us against each other as has happened before.
We will unite! One billion of our Turan brothers will unite.
URAL-ALTAIC PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE & PAN-TURANIC UNION
DeKaratna 1 year ago 2
Interesting video, I am of Italian descent and recently took a Paternal DNA test that put me in a group sharing similar DNA from people in Turkey. This could certainly support that result.
DarkShaula 1 year ago
@DarkShaula
This is right. A study by geneticist Alberto Piazza of the University of Turin linked the Etruscans to Turkey. The team compared DNA sequences with those from men in modern Turkey, northern Italy, the Greek island of Lemnos, the Italian islands of Sicily and Sardinia and the southern Balkans.
IdelUralState 1 year ago
They found that the genetic sequences of the Tuscan men varied significantly from those of men in surrounding regions in Italy, and that the men from Murlo and Volterra were the most closely related to men from Turkey. In Murlo in particular, one genetic variant is shared only by people from Turkey.
IdelUralState 1 year ago
@DarkShaula Their is some evidence to suggest the Etruscans originated south of the Black Sea, probably in Asia Minor. However, it's a stretch to label them as "Turkic". Ethnic Turkic people prior to the 5th century AD were largely confined to central Asia. Only several hundred years later did they expand westward into the Near East and Europe. So the Etruscan people predate Turkic expansion into Asia Minor by at least a millenia.
snowstormcan 1 year ago
@snowstormcan You are talking about only one Turkish tribe like seldjuks entered Anatolia im 1071 AD.. in fact there were thousand of Turkish tribes all gathered in Central Asia to survive from ice age of 56.000 years and great migrations all sourced out from Central Asia where people protected against deadly effects of ice age. Many Turkish tribes came to Anatolia some just passed by and some settled there centuries ago. There are numerous findings there belong to Turks.
deeptuber109 1 year ago
@9xxxxxxxxx "firs people african" is my shit ! it is a lie of darwinist europe !
all of us had come by Adam and his wife ! but turk is comming by grand son of prophet Noah, his name was Tur-uk.
MrEmretti 1 year ago
REALLY NICE VIDEO AND GOOD MUSIC!
spa05akw 1 year ago
This can be true!!!
Hungarian and Etruscan language is similar. So similar that an educutated man who know the proto-hungarian language can read particular the Etruscan writings.The todays turkish and hungarian language is similar too.
The steppe rune writing(used by turkic and scyhtian nation) was written from right to left so as the Etruscans. The Hun and the etruscan alphabet-characters are similar too.
Zikhajj 1 year ago 23
@Zikhajj
Yes indeed brother you are so right ! The hypocrite west want to hide our Turanian History they want to hide all the ancient Hunnic, Bulgarian etc. inventions and Empires as well.
IdelUralState 1 year ago 8
@Zikhajj Fine, and you personally know this educated man, who know proto-hungarian and how at the same time has already read the etruscian writing to translating this to you? why dont you than write an articel abot this found????????!!!!
RabbiMendel 11 months ago
The Etruscans came from Anatolia. They spoke the old turkish language. The blond people and red haired people came from Kazachstan and Mongolia tooo.
Alberto Piazza ended his discussion and he scientifilly profed that the Etruscan DNA only came together with the Turkish DNA in anatolia.
DonGiovanni008 1 year ago 2
And Turkic people don't look like Africans :). The western mythe said that the first people are the AFricans. But that's not 100% scientifically proved. They spend billlions of dollars. So why is the Turkic history the oldest and the richest, answer that question:)
Don't forget that there are 39 turkish cultures in Asia (Turkic peoples). The history is too long to understand the whole history
DonGiovanni008 1 year ago
HISTORYofGreece claims they are the descendants of Etruscans, ask why they can not read their writings but the TURKS. Latin alphabet comes from Turkish Runic alphabet and the Turks were in Anatolia 7000BC. You will eventually accept this and your historians cannot lie to you forever!!!
hirbo06 1 year ago
Here is the DNA results proving that Etruscans were in fact TURKIC ORIGIN. Simply use google translate for translation...search for
1. ETRUSCHI VENUTI DALLA TURCHIA, LO DICE IL DNA DEI TOSCANI
2. The enigma of Italy's ancient Etruscans is finally unravelled
hirbo06 1 year ago
they were mesopotamion i thinkt hey are connect to indo-european family... they arent turkic.. turkic people are asians.. they dont look asian
fabianogunes 1 year ago
@fabianogunes
Etruscans can't be related to Indo-Europeans because Etruscans used Turkic deities and their language was agglutinative, what is typical for Turkic Peoples. Also Turks in the Altai areas are still blond and blue-eyed, it is their original look.
IdelUralState 1 year ago
Here is the DNA results proving that Etruscans were in fact TURKIC ORIGIN. use google translate for translation...google;
1. ETRUSCHI VENUTI DALLA TURCHIA, LO DICE IL DNA DEI TOSCANI
2. The enigma of Italy's ancient Etruscans is finally unravelled
And just to let you know fabianogunes if HISTORYofGreece claims they are the descendants of Etruscans, ask why they can not read their writings but the TURKS.
hirbo06 1 year ago
@fabianogunes you think they are Mesopotamian :)) why are you not research first before you write,thinking is not enough.
and first Mesoptamian are also from central asia and they are Turanian nation and languach was also proto turkic.(Turuk).
turania58 1 year ago
@111emm
Dass Problem ist, dass die Türkische Republik von äußeren imperialistischen Mächten im türkischen Parlament durch die anti-kemalistische AKP regiert wird. Erst wenn die Türkei wieder auf den kemalistischen Weg kommt, können solche Bücher wie die von Kazim Mirsan oder Haluk Tarcan im großen Stil veröffentlicht werde.
IdelUralState 1 year ago
Very beautiful video. Can you fix the grammatical errors?
ancalimonungol 1 year ago