The concept of a rocket is a simple one. The maths of setting up orbits and transferring orbits is simple. The calculations to plan a trip to the moon are ludicrously simple.
All they needed to do was build the rockets to meet the specifications laid down by this MATH. The scientists who designed the Saturn V had been building rockets since before WW2.
Look at you, writing your conspiracy theories on a device a million times more complex than the Saturn V rocket or the CSM.
Watch the flag pole Gentlemen at 0:53 Keep an eye on it through 1:30 Notice how the flag appers to be in front of him. You can see its outline on his helmet.
That's called "ghosting", where bright objects burn through and stay on the screen momentarily, if you weren't so fuck ass stupid you'd look it up and educate yourself.
Matttwquirk: The guy @46 was hanging on a string from a boom/crane. If they were n the moon why would there be a need to provide the flag w/ a hanger? Notice the horizon, Why is it that it is in spherical shape? The moon was glowing via the sun so the vid should show the string of horizon in straight line. The moon here is so small. It reveals a studio shot. the vid was just given a slow mo. I'm not an artist, only a person who can appreciate art and so my keen eye is more limited.
@mattwquirk The guy @46 was hanging on a string from a boom/crane. If they were n the moon why would there be a need to provide the flag w/ a hanger? Notice the horizon, Why is it that it is in spherical shape? The moon was glowing via the sun so the vid should show the string of horizon in straight line. The moon here is so small. It reveals a studio shot. the vid was just given a slow mo. I'm not an artist, only a person who can appreciate art and so my keen eye is more limited.
The most brilliant evidence is the dust he kicks up, it flies very far due to no air resistance. They are in a vacuum. Therefore they are on the moon.
@Flyberius it is more likely that they have giant fans in a studio that will blow the dust very far, but the fan is aimed only slightly above the ground so it does not disturb dust that is sitting there but only dust that is kicked up
@boxpilot I think the simpler answer is they were on the moon.
Also, the fan would not blow dust on a ballistic trajectory. The whole reason we see a ballistic trajectory is due to the total lack of atmosphere. They are in a vacuum.
Anyway, I am done arguing this. There are a million reasons you will never believe this happened. I am just glad your lack of belief in human ingenuity, perseverance and scientific knowledge isn't going to prevent further space exploration.
@mattwquirk "50lbs+ of gear", can you send me the proof ? he have 50lbs+ on this video... you can't proof that. So: start hopping is maybe possible. (lol)
+ NASA supposedly lost the original video.
+ Many scientists (including you is not) proves there are too many anomalies in the live video from 1969 and other video. So stop! the United States can't (they're the ones who say it) back to the moon, because in reality USA never going to the moon !
@totototo814 your spelling and grammer is horrible, The U.S.A has been to the moon meny times. We have brought back tons of samples. If you knew anything you would know that every respected scientist knows we have been to the moon.
@MickeyMouseApollo hey asswipe it has been proven over and over and over by other countries not just the USA that their has been humans on the moon so the one that sould be behind bars is you fuckass!
@americaisbroke Buddy you must be one of the smartest people I no I just learnd that about 3 hours before your comment when I asked why people are stupid enough to believe that tha moonlanding is fake!!!!
Alright so if they didn't land on the moon where did the space rocks nasa picked up from i got to see them and hold the priceless things with my own hands
@americaisbroke The phrase you wrote "too much light reflecting off the surface" proves you're an idiot.
As far as sky visibility is concerned what it matters is the light reflection in the atmosphere not the surface.And since the moon has NO gaseous atmosphere THRE IS NO REFLECTION between suspended particles,thus NO DAY in the lunar sky exists.That means the stars are visible ALL the time.Probably when humans travel there for1st time(in about 50-100 years)you'll get it in you thick shit brain.
@MickeyMouseApollo If what you are saying is true then we should be able to see a star filled sky on a clear night in a big light filled city. But we don't. Maybe you should venture out of the trailer park sometime and see for yourself.
@MickeyMouseApollo what about the 400,000 engineers and the 20,000 universities and companies who worked in the Apollo program more budget than the soviet union?
The sunlight is only on the lunar surface and part of the lunar sky. The lunar sky never has day.If the sun is up,only the part with the sun is bright. The rest of the lunar sky is black and thus the stars are visible all the time.
@MickeyMouseApollo you have obviously never spent much time outside in the snow without sunglasses on...snow blindness comes from the light reflected off the snow and will literally blind you (especially your distance sight) for a while if not protected. On top of that, you know those cameras (and the astronauts visors) had to be using some heavy glare filters which could easily black out stars in the far background...so...yeah...too much light reflecting off the surface makes sense...unlike you
@possumverde Another little uneducated piece of shit.
If you go to the fucking moon,stand on the fucking surface and look UP in the fucking lunar sky ,NO reflections are visible NO day exists due to absence of motherfucking atmosphere and the sky IS BLACK. Ans black sky means NO scattered LIGHT REFLECTIONS! Therefore the stars ARE VISIBLE! DO YOU FUCKING UNDERSTAND THAT?
@MickeyMouseApollo Allow me: Yes, if You look straight up in the sky from Moons surface and have NO brightly illuminated object (landscape, spaceship, Earth) in Your field of view, You'll see stars. But, the astronauts didn't lie on their backs staring straight up, so they didn't see the stars.
Your eyes will adapt to the light. The astronauts eyes adapted to the sunlit landscape. The stars were very dim compared to the landscape.
@MickeyMouseApollo OK, I understand. You are to stupid to understand simple things as physics, photography, astronomy and the like. If You want to live in a smaller world than the real one, You're welcome...
@YDDES Your moonlanding faith (a dogma) not science. Don't bring science in to discussion .
Science is a concept you have nothing to do with.
Just as the comical Apollo story has as much relation to science as mother Teresa with football.
It is science that rejects in the most emphatic manner possible your fairytale.
And you are very lucky you live in USA a criminal shithole with no justice whatsoever,otherwise you and others like you would have locked in with Aldrin and the other crooks.
No scientist (or not scientist)ever research the authenticity of the moonlanding and found it true. ALL THE RESEARCHERS EVER HAVE FOUND IT TO BE A ....H-O-A-X !!! get use to it moron.
@MickeyMouseApollo OK, tell me where to find the peer-reviewed scientifical reports stating that the moonlandings were faked,(SCIENTIFICAL means in wellknown Scientifical magazines), or admit You are a lying idiot.
You are a very annoying little motherfucker aren't you? What science you talking there you fucking retard? People who don't know the radiation belts and people who don't know what solar corona is are going to the moon? SINCE FUCKING WHEN? What sort of fucking fairytale you talking here moron? Oh yeah! maybe Neil Armstrong wrote an article about the soda corolla. Perhaps he talks to people like you.But please keep your criminal propaganda away of our children moronic son of a bitch/
@MickeyMouseApollo I'm talking about University professors and other well educated people. Bet they know A LOT more than You about radiation belts and solar coronas. And, how to build rockets and spaceships.
After all, it's those scientists, and not YOU, who have discovered and studied the radiation belts and all the problems with flights in space. You seems to just relay on those who make money by selling "hoax" books and videos to the gullible. Read some scientifical journals instead!
@MickeyMouseApollo What have you rag heads done beside blowing people up who tell truth about islam? You go to democratic nations to ask for freedom, but when you get it, you start oppressing simple civil life by forbidding the truth to be told under the threat of death. Ragheaded fool!
Look how far the regolith travels from his foot at 0:19 and 0:42. To get that distance here on Earth, there would have to be a fair bit of air movement in the same direction as he is travelling. If it were a fine talc or cement it would be a frigging sandstorm or rather a talc storm. cont..
@stampw0rx ...cont Only joking. That was one of my jobs there. Back then, I had to clean all the cement ahem..regolith from the suits at the end of the days filming. Around 23 toothbrushes per suit if memory serves and the sweat inside from the lighting gantries, jeepers that was a bad! It pooled in the boots which we poured into a bucket, oh the smell!! That Aldrins feet phewee!
'There is no evidence that we land on the moon only some crappy footage. Wy they dont go back with HD Cameras.'
Are you REALLY that ignorant? There are mountains of evidence that prove we walked on the Moon. If you can't understand THAT, anything else would be easily rejected by your closed mind, anyway.
Hi where can I find more evidence. I believe for such a big project, there must be a video recording from start to end; I mean the whole trip from earth to moon and then from moon back to earth. I think a short clip wouldn't be enough of an evidence, isn't it?
I suggest the bautforum (dot) com conspiracy pages. The MHBs don't like it because there are REAL astronomers, physicists, thermo-dynamic experts, etc. that respond expertly to their ludicrous, ignorant claims. They provide plenty of references and examples. You can also go to NASA's site itself, or there is even an excellent serires of books that contain the Apollo 11 Mission logs that you can buy on-line. The third one has an amazing DVD included. Any questions?
Thx for the reference. BTW, do you know how is it explained regarding the flag staying still without being pull by the gravity of the moon. While the more lighter sands / dusts kicked by the astronauts immediately falls back to the grounds and doesn't float or stay still in space like the flag is ?
The Moon has gravity, just 1/6th that of Earth's. Dust falls immediately as there is no appreciable atmosphere to suspend it for any length of time. The flag hangs out straight because it is attached to a telescopic pole along the top length (on Apollo 11, the pole stuck before fully extending, thus giving the flag a 'rippled' look - later missions liked the look, so they never extended their rods fully).
@americaisbroke one other thing is that the phenomenon of crossing ilght rays is different from atmospheric scattering which is caused by multiple reflections till the light intensity of one of the weaker source becomes almost zero. it's because the luminosity of the stronger light source gets scattered almost indefinitely while the weaker light is not enough to go on scattering without loss of lumens.
@americaisbroke the stars don't become visible because of the brightness. and the term brightness applies only to a planet with an atmosphere. on the moon in the absence of any atmos, the light reflecting off the surface would not scatter. and since crossing light rays don't cause interference in the other's path, the stars would be perfectly visible even during a lunar day.
the astronauts couldn't see them because of their gold visors. although i accept the apollo missions took place.
9/11 Inside Job-- Moonfake--Obama deception---Haarp--Chemtrails--Bilderberger---Illuminati---freemanson----2012 elenin nibiru planet x---Health and food---Aspartam---Coke)--Fluorid--Water) amalgam--Dents) Money storys)---Aids lie)---GENOZID Eugenics------ and much more Informations about the New World Order
Cuz jumping around like monkeys , kicking rocks and driving kinda wreckless is exactly what NASA would consider safe to do in space, lol. WE DIDNT GO and its becoming more and more embarrasing to be called an American.
Something else that actually Proves this a hoax...the Flag is Flapping in the breeze. ? what breeze, there's no atmosphere on the moon. No air. So tell me how the flag is flapping? And no shadows either. But look, shadows. Ha!
OMGWTFBBQ even the most brain dead hoaxers don't say anything about the flags motion because it's been explained PATIENTLY a million times since the very first 1969 broadcast when people asked about it.
And what's this silly shit you are claiming about there being no shadows on the moon? Are you really that stupid?
first things first: the flag doesn't flap as in a breeze. the flag only oscillates randomly when the astronauts swivels the flagpole. when you have no air resistance, there's virtually nothing dampening the motion until the potential energy gets diminished over time.
secondly, shadows on the rugged and uneven moon surface can't be judged by our view of it thru 2d pictures and 2d videos. you can't do it on earth either. perspective on the moon is different altogether.
@artzilla and the flag isn't flapping. the effect is seen because of the low video quality. it's called apparent motion due pixelation. try to see the same from the nasa archives (some are hd vids) and you'll appreciate this.
The well known American moon hoax member Buzz Aldrin is a theorist. He assumes(and according to his theory we have to assume)that the Soviets had the ability to track Apollo..despite the fact these long ago extinct Soviet idiots couldn't spot a plane over Moscow even a whole 20 years after the time of the Apollo moon hoax/film/crime/fraud,or whatever you call it,of 1969 on which the theorist villain Aldrin played a center role.
Im from serbia and im in hig school im love to be astronaut but in serba dont have this universyti .... evrewon hwo know the contry for astronauts please contact me on this e -mail govnar2@hotmail.com please im wona know wher is that universyti !
Just go watch some beach volley ball and watch the sand underneath those beautiful girls feet, but you might get distracted a bit by those nice tight athletic women's ass's
@blahbloblfy. Hey cumhole explain too me, why the 195lb astronaut seems lighter than the sand and, falls the same way here on earth and he seems almost weightless. Um because you can't put a wire on the sand TARD
@monkeyboysdontknow Well on the moon mass and weight should not matter they should fall at the same speed because of lack of air resistance. Did that answer your question hope so. Science I passed with all A's,as for spelling and punctuation that's a different story. lol
What a bunch of BS!!! I would believe it if the moon sand would just stay floating a bit longer than the 195lb man with all of his equipment on LMFAO FAIL FAIL FAIL.
' I would believe it if the moon sand would just stay floating a bit longer than the 195lb man with all of his equipment on LMFAO FAIL FAIL FAIL'
I can only assume your last 3 words indicate what you did in science class. Proof: Answer this question - In a vacuum subjected to uniform gravity (such as you and me here on Earth - OR the Moon) , which falls faster, a bird's feather, or a 200lb. anvil?
And if you think their movements at 2x speed look funny, you ought to see them at 2.45 x speed, which is the correct speed proportion between earth's gravity and the moon's. Of course the hoax nuts will say "Yeah but... yeah but... yeah but...," still without a clue what they're talking about, pushing themselves ever closer to real schizophrenia, as they try to rationalize away irrefutable evidence.
@adels2010alg In galaxies... that we can't see with our naked eye....
Okay, I'll be serious. The camera isn't showing stars because the moon is being hit by sun beams, making it bright, unless the camera had a high exposure mode, which most didn't back when this was made, the stars wouldn't appear because the camera would be focusing on the very bright moon, not the very faint stars. Take a picture of the night sky with a camera, most modern day cameras can't even see stars when it's night time
@Nostro200 yes you can, if you were there maybe you could, but coz of the cameras they used to record astronauts as better as they can, these cameras wont be able to see mini lights such as stars, u got it? everything has an explanation...
typically the debunkers are those who just want to believe, they want that feeling of human achievement to hold onto sorta like religion, the others are people who work in the industry, who collect currency from this. if they were to just openly claim it was fake what value do they hold, they would be homeless in a matter of weeks. so the reality is while we'll never know and there will be misinformation agents on both sides, i think cynically about the whole process and believe it a sham.
Guys it's been proven time and time again, and this video clip proves it further.. we have been to the moon, and you should be really proud humanity has achieved this astounding feat.
So stop with this conspiracy nonsense, you're just embarrassing yourselves. :3
@afterhumanity333 and when you realize that the governmant has lied to you about everything no one will stop you when you put the gun barrel in your mouth.
This is real right? It doesn't seem so scary. When I was plugged into that virtual reality space porn, they were sticking much worse things than flags in the craters. I've said too much already.
@ 0:28 how is he able to stand up with and be at a 60 degree angle and not fall over and then start to spring forward and straghten up again? very odd looking. and don't give me any b.s. about the low gravity. low gravity shouldn't enable such an odd posture. just my opinon
@timwik2-well, look. If you look at the actual video, he is not on a flat surface, he's standing at an angle on a hill. That alone, can help him get up without the astronaut doing much of anything.
@dalek14mc you make the comment in your video that everything the usa did was in the focus of the survival of man and the russians was in context of probes and unmanned missions. strange don't you think that everything in modern space exploration is about probes and unmanned missions. Lol! you contradict yourself in your own videos, son.
@timwik2-It's funny how you stray off topic. I don't see how I contradict myself, everything I mentioned was within the premises of the space race, not modern missions, son. Learn how to listen to the context better, son.
haha man they really went out of there way to to prove they went to the moon,
ya back then some people would see this as reall and ya there is still a few today (not to cleaver) people that still think they did haha funny though nice try NASA short on funding lets try and fool people and go to the MOON haha!!
If you want proof it was fake, check out Alan Sheppard playing golf. He drops 2nd ball and it falls in real time. He also claims to have improvised a 6 iron head onto his collector stick. Not as easy as it sounds.
Oops. I am sorry I read the description of your video and it seems you were trying to point to a different direction . It seems to me they are on our mother's earth. Nobody can jump unbalancedly sideways without falling flat on the ground no matter if gravity is a fraction of that on earth.
The hoax is more than proved for me. However something that has not been commented on is the merry go lucky attitude of the guys in these films Being on the surface of the moon or any other planet's would make a man nervous and apprehensive, and fearful of the unknown, These guys seem at home, playful and ready to frolic and dance around. That's not credible.
@elvisinpersonator Think of it this way. These guys just had one of their BIGGEST LIFE DREAMS come true. Their on the FUCKING moon for frak's sake! If I ended up on the moon like they did I would have been fucking ecstatic & excited too! U dont know how some1 will react UNTIL their in that situation so until u experience somethin like they did how about u keep ur narrow-minded opinions to urself. Until u can actually prove to me that the landing of the moon didnt take place, keep ur mouth shut.
This freaking scam has been proved a hoax from all points of view: physics on the moon don't hold in their film, There are inconsistencies in their pictures, concerning lightning, size of things between one pic and the other, and even disappearing a reappearing lem sequences. AndI thought your vid adds to proving it. I already told you why. It's not my intention to offend you or convince you otherwise. But please respect freedom of expression.
@elvisinpersonator Look I wont debate w/ u in this particular subject, it is COMPLETELY pointless. I have nothing against ur freedom of expres. whatsoever. What frustrates me is how many people, not saying that u do, seem 2 always rail some1 that believes in the moon landing & will go 2 considerable lengths 2 try 2 prove their point while not having the decency 2 accept or even respect that opposing individual's opinion or belief. Their essentially ignoring that persons freedom of expression.
@elvisinpersonator And my apologies for coming off quite strong. I've been watching to many moon landing vids and kinda get pissed after reading a lot of ignorant posts by users on this website.
Please also accept my apologies. I wouldn't have posted if I had realized you were a believer in the Moon landings. I did not realize it until I read the description after I had already posted. My bad.
And if you think their movements at 2x speed look funny, you ought to see them at 2.45 x speed, which is the correct speed proportion between earth's gravity and the moon's. Of course the hoax nuts will say "Yeah but... yeah but... yeah but...," still without a clue what they're talking about, pushing themselves ever closer to real schizophrenia, as they try to rationalize away irrefutable evidence.
Case in point, check out the last few videos of arcangel4myke.
@newguy33X (Pt 1) Sorry, I would have answered but Jarrah White filed more DMCAs on me after the first 21 were restored. This time he got my account suspended. But I'm back now.
Look at the units for gravitational acceleration: m/sec^2. It is that squared factor that causes the difference. The moon's is 1.63 and the earth's is 9.8 -- a factor of six. The force of gravity you feel is an acceleration, so this uses the time squared factor. (Distance per second per second)
@Astrobrant2 Time alone, is linear, though. For comparing time, distance, or average velocity differences between falling objects on the moon and earth, you need to take the square root of 6, or 2.45.
I'm not good enough to give you a demonstration with equations. I just understand the principle. Go to gravitycalc . com. You can play with figures for earth and moon. Put in the same distance for each and compare the times.
@Astrobrant2 exactly, and even if a video is slowed down 2.45 times, the resulting effect is more like a slow-motion we see in the movies. the hoaxers then try "ok, it should be 1.45 times" or some other such s**t. but one thing the hoaxers forget is the movement of regolith being kicked up and falling. the path is a perfect parabola without any slow-mo fx. and that more than vouches for the apollo authenticity.
i tried to explain the above to many hoaxers but they just wouldn't listen.
I see the question of being faked is addressed here.What are the radiation levels in space and would a human be able to survive.I work with radiation and I already know the answer.So what do you think?
It's obvious that the only thing "slowed down" about their movements are when things fall. their arm movements are as fast as they would be anywhere else. If you believe the moon landing was faked you have brain damage.
To all the conspiracy theorist nuts out there: How many times have you been in 5/6 the earths gravity? You must have been there at least once to know how fast they should, or shouldn't be moving. Speed up footage of the astronauts in the international space station, and you will get the same results. I'm sure you'll just claim that as a hoax too.
it so fake .....he running too fast and . the astronaut getting up with the help of the cable rig... little thing like this just show you they fake it all
Well, the point of speeding up the video is to prove that it was faked. That the astronauts were moving at normal speed in their space-suits, and that the footage was then slowed down, and given a 'voice-over'.
But of course, there is the counter argument, that if it was faked, and slowed down, that the arm movements of the astronauts seems to be moving faster than normal.
before i thought its not true. now i know its not a hoax, its real we landed in the moon. they hired people to make it fake. coz theres a top secret in the moon that they dont want people know.
@mixsterfranky - The flag is much closer than you're assuming it to be. The poor quality of this movie clip makes it hard to see, but if you look carefully you will see that the bottom of the flagpole is lower than it initially appears in that clip.
You can see the flagpole more clearly here;
/watch?v=ZgGFU1oDxAE
There's a dark section on the flagpole that blends in with the moon's surface, but you can see the bottom of the flagpole (roughly level with the feet of the astronaut who jumps).
@CT2507 The second part. I know what you mean PIVOTING. This few frames can really look weird but we haven`t been there for long (on haven`t been at all - still possible) so we cannot say for sure that some gravity , mass and vacuum(!) properties cannot create such impression. For us it is unknown how really human body and physics would work there.
@CT2507 I agree with the jump simulation part. It can be done on wires ok. But it also can be done on moon right? It would be very hard to get exact of 1.62m/s free fall impression. I`m not an idiot i`m open to other way of thinking and i don`t say it is not a hoax we just don`t have VERY CLEAR evidence. If u have software and knowlegde to do this please can you try to count what is the free fall time at least we can then try to say is it possible or not.
Next thing...2x video from 1:44 if thos was done 2x faster in original the jump would look different..again gravity of the moon is MUCH LESS then on earth (basic education) as u can see on this video when astronaut jumps up and then falling down the jump to highest point and fall takes about same time or fall takes a little bit longer than jump. On earth try to jump you will fall much faster when hitting highest point of jump.
@grubens80 idiot. with wires u can simulate that jump so u fall at the same speed, and it is what they did. u have no argument. open your eyes instead and LOOK at what's on the film. it screams wires, wires, WIIIIIIIIIIRES !!!!
my God, u people are like religious fanatics. and i know. i've met my share of them in my life.
such an angle is only possible to sustain IF one is lifted up by the help of wires!!" the angle is possible cause moon has much less gravity than earth so it is possible to do that on the moon. You would then need abouy 1/6 strenght to go to vertical position from bended position. try to do it home.No succes? Now imagine you weight 60kg here on earth - on the moon you would weight like 10kg but you have the same muscle power. Would you be able to do Michael Jackson`s "Thriller" move ? YES
@grubens80 watch at 0:27 right after he gets up, he doesn't turn, but pivots on his centre axis!
and watch again at the part with fast speed. at 0:47 its very clear. the astronot is PIVOTING right after he gets up. not turning, but P-I-V-O-T-I-N-G!!! get it!!
lunar gravity has nothing to do with such a move. only wires. frigging WIRES, as in W-I-R-E-S, can make u turn like that.
Damn, it pisses me off that so many of u are so blind! i wouldn't trust on u guys to sell me an ice-cream!
hehehe... watch the stupid angle his body is in when he gets up from that fall at 0:26 ! :))
such an angle is only possible to sustain IF one is lifted up by the help of wires!!
besides, why are the astronauts moving in slow-motion? and im not only talking of his silly bunny-jumps, but his head and arms too. compare with the Russian and american space walks!! they don't happen in slow-motion!
@CT2507 Cyprus is a stronghold for the lizard people. You can't trick us, lizard, you're all scales and shit, fake as fake can be. Heh, thought you were slick, didn't you, lizard? I thought so.
@SlipSloop sure we have lizards. we have goats. and we have batty-boys like u who fuck the goats sometimes...but not all of us like to watch. some like to participate also!
my family have a donkey which we keep mainly for the fucking. donkeys have big dicks, and sometimes we invite only the females of our family, and let the donkey get down on them...while we men enjoy tea with olives. which is nice cause then the women are calm for at least a week.
is this Moonbase Alpha cosplayers?
JOHN MADDEN JOHN MADDEN JOHN MADDEN JOHN MADDEN JOHN MADDEN
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
GrounderTheRobot 4 hours ago
Comment removed
atrabucco829 2 days ago
Aw, they're so cute at 2x speed.
Woffle21jade 3 days ago
if any 1 is against me than u may talk with me...........plllzplzplllllllllllzzzzzzzzzz
mettalicdude 1 week ago
moon landing is totaly fake..............because rocket follow neutons3rd law ,,,,,,,,ad thre is no atmosphere on moon then how they came back
mettalicdude 1 week ago
How the fuck is this in howto and style?
Tjthemedic 3 weeks ago
@Tjthemedic yo u needs dat swag 2 b jumpin on da moon homie
JamesD567 2 weeks ago
The concept of a rocket is a simple one. The maths of setting up orbits and transferring orbits is simple. The calculations to plan a trip to the moon are ludicrously simple.
All they needed to do was build the rockets to meet the specifications laid down by this MATH. The scientists who designed the Saturn V had been building rockets since before WW2.
Look at you, writing your conspiracy theories on a device a million times more complex than the Saturn V rocket or the CSM.
Such hypocrisy .
Flyberius 3 weeks ago
Watch the flag pole Gentlemen at 0:53 Keep an eye on it through 1:30 Notice how the flag appers to be in front of him. You can see its outline on his helmet.
The Moon Landing was FAKE AS HELL......PERIOD!
rasmann181 4 weeks ago
@rasmann181
That's called "ghosting", where bright objects burn through and stay on the screen momentarily, if you weren't so fuck ass stupid you'd look it up and educate yourself.
Blahblobify 2 weeks ago in playlist ASTRONAUT
This has been flagged as spam show
Matttwquirk: The guy @46 was hanging on a string from a boom/crane. If they were n the moon why would there be a need to provide the flag w/ a hanger? Notice the horizon, Why is it that it is in spherical shape? The moon was glowing via the sun so the vid should show the string of horizon in straight line. The moon here is so small. It reveals a studio shot. the vid was just given a slow mo. I'm not an artist, only a person who can appreciate art and so my keen eye is more limited.
happymanfeelssogood 1 month ago
@mattwquirk The guy @46 was hanging on a string from a boom/crane. If they were n the moon why would there be a need to provide the flag w/ a hanger? Notice the horizon, Why is it that it is in spherical shape? The moon was glowing via the sun so the vid should show the string of horizon in straight line. The moon here is so small. It reveals a studio shot. the vid was just given a slow mo. I'm not an artist, only a person who can appreciate art and so my keen eye is more limited.
happymanfeelssogood 1 month ago
@mattwquirk who's to say that that gear weighs 50 lbs? O,o
transformersloverjon 1 month ago
That bastard is running at a 45 degree angle.
thecubanism 1 month ago
moooon. shit cmon dont just WANT them to be lying, we are advanced. although i dont belive the 1st moon landings true.
RixxYbrolleyTash 1 month ago
That people dont belive we went to the moon is just so so sad! What is the world coming to????
cdrbmw 1 month ago
The most brilliant evidence is the dust he kicks up, it flies very far due to no air resistance. They are in a vacuum. Therefore they are on the moon.
Flyberius 1 month ago
@Flyberius it is more likely that they have giant fans in a studio that will blow the dust very far, but the fan is aimed only slightly above the ground so it does not disturb dust that is sitting there but only dust that is kicked up
boxpilot 3 weeks ago
@boxpilot I think the simpler answer is they were on the moon.
Also, the fan would not blow dust on a ballistic trajectory. The whole reason we see a ballistic trajectory is due to the total lack of atmosphere. They are in a vacuum.
Anyway, I am done arguing this. There are a million reasons you will never believe this happened. I am just glad your lack of belief in human ingenuity, perseverance and scientific knowledge isn't going to prevent further space exploration.
Flyberius 3 weeks ago
Theres no bananas, on the MOOOOOOOOOOOOON!
CheeseNcrackers79 2 months ago
No scientist denies that. just nasa scientific, but all time he said "we dont have the good scientific for return on the moon"
Nasa lie.
totototo814 2 months ago
@mattwquirk "50lbs+ of gear", can you send me the proof ? he have 50lbs+ on this video... you can't proof that. So: start hopping is maybe possible. (lol)
+ NASA supposedly lost the original video.
+ Many scientists (including you is not) proves there are too many anomalies in the live video from 1969 and other video. So stop! the United States can't (they're the ones who say it) back to the moon, because in reality USA never going to the moon !
totototo814 2 months ago
@totototo814 There is no such proof. Anyone who says otherwise is a fool or a charlatan and probably both.
Why do you think you are so much smarter than all of the astrophysicists and the Soviet Union? What an ego on you people.
monokhem 1 month ago
@totototo814 your spelling and grammer is horrible, The U.S.A has been to the moon meny times. We have brought back tons of samples. If you knew anything you would know that every respected scientist knows we have been to the moon.
wbubby 1 month ago
Comment removed
totototo814 2 months ago
The key here is the sand. It atmosphere there would be dust clouds all around them, but the moon gravity simply does its work.
Lachausis 2 months ago
@SuryaVanshRai um buddy the shadow of the falg is at 53 seconds pointing to the left!!!
thejonathan130 3 months ago
@MickeyMouseApollo hey asswipe it has been proven over and over and over by other countries not just the USA that their has been humans on the moon so the one that sould be behind bars is you fuckass!
thejonathan130 3 months ago
@thejonathan130
With your mum?
MickeyMouseApollo 3 months ago
@MickeyMouseApollo no dick smear you and your fucking homo boyfriend!!!! now stop making false claims look at pictures of the moon taken by russia!
thejonathan130 3 months ago
@americaisbroke Buddy you must be one of the smartest people I no I just learnd that about 3 hours before your comment when I asked why people are stupid enough to believe that tha moonlanding is fake!!!!
thejonathan130 3 months ago
where is the shadow of the flag foolsssssssssssssssssssssssssss????????????????????/
SuryaVanshRai 3 months ago
so your saying that they slowed it down to try and make it real .... explain how he got up from when he hit the floor with just his toes .... dick
stickydude30 3 months ago
Alright so if they didn't land on the moon where did the space rocks nasa picked up from i got to see them and hold the priceless things with my own hands
55nhelmer 3 months ago
@55nhelmer so you are saying to me that we landed on the moon in 1969 with that technology, but we can't do it now with modern technology ?
pavoSNK 3 months ago
faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaake
pavoSNK 3 months ago
@pavoSNK and internet and celular phones, personal computers are fake too.
echozgus 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@americaisbroke lol kid
This is what a space visitor said when he went into space for the first time
Melville the Space Tourist said
"Seeing the bright blue sky turning pitch black and seeing stars appear while it is daytime is absolutely
mind blowing"
But Armstrong the liar never saw stars in cislunar space.
NASA = US NWO CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT
APOLLO BULLSHIT
DeadJesus100 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NASA MICKEY MOUSE MOON LANDINGS
1969-1972
FILMED ON PLANET EARTH
DeadJesus100 4 months ago
@americaisbroke The phrase you wrote "too much light reflecting off the surface" proves you're an idiot.
As far as sky visibility is concerned what it matters is the light reflection in the atmosphere not the surface.And since the moon has NO gaseous atmosphere THRE IS NO REFLECTION between suspended particles,thus NO DAY in the lunar sky exists.That means the stars are visible ALL the time.Probably when humans travel there for1st time(in about 50-100 years)you'll get it in you thick shit brain.
MickeyMouseApollo 4 months ago
@MickeyMouseApollo If what you are saying is true then we should be able to see a star filled sky on a clear night in a big light filled city. But we don't. Maybe you should venture out of the trailer park sometime and see for yourself.
yeebeascurvydawg 4 months ago
@yeebeascurvydawg
Go back to school and while you there ask them to explain to you what atmosphere is,and what does to the light.
MickeyMouseApollo 4 months ago
@MickeyMouseApollo what about the 400,000 engineers and the 20,000 universities and companies who worked in the Apollo program more budget than the soviet union?
echozgus 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@yeebeascurvydawg
There is no day on the moon sky.
The sunlight is only on the lunar surface and part of the lunar sky. The lunar sky never has day.If the sun is up,only the part with the sun is bright. The rest of the lunar sky is black and thus the stars are visible all the time.
ApolloWasRealHoax 4 months ago
@MickeyMouseApollo you have obviously never spent much time outside in the snow without sunglasses on...snow blindness comes from the light reflected off the snow and will literally blind you (especially your distance sight) for a while if not protected. On top of that, you know those cameras (and the astronauts visors) had to be using some heavy glare filters which could easily black out stars in the far background...so...yeah...too much light reflecting off the surface makes sense...unlike you
possumverde 3 months ago
@possumverde Another little uneducated piece of shit.
If you go to the fucking moon,stand on the fucking surface and look UP in the fucking lunar sky ,NO reflections are visible NO day exists due to absence of motherfucking atmosphere and the sky IS BLACK. Ans black sky means NO scattered LIGHT REFLECTIONS! Therefore the stars ARE VISIBLE! DO YOU FUCKING UNDERSTAND THAT?
MickeyMouseApollo 3 months ago
@MickeyMouseApollo Allow me: Yes, if You look straight up in the sky from Moons surface and have NO brightly illuminated object (landscape, spaceship, Earth) in Your field of view, You'll see stars. But, the astronauts didn't lie on their backs staring straight up, so they didn't see the stars.
Your eyes will adapt to the light. The astronauts eyes adapted to the sunlit landscape. The stars were very dim compared to the landscape.
Just as simple as that!
YDDES 3 months ago
@YDDES
What astronauts you talking about joker?
As far as we can recall nobody ever went to the moon.
The Apollo clowns should be behind bars from 12/8/69/
MickeyMouseApollo 3 months ago
@MickeyMouseApollo OK, I understand. You are to stupid to understand simple things as physics, photography, astronomy and the like. If You want to live in a smaller world than the real one, You're welcome...
YDDES 3 months ago
@YDDES Your moonlanding faith (a dogma) not science. Don't bring science in to discussion .
Science is a concept you have nothing to do with.
Just as the comical Apollo story has as much relation to science as mother Teresa with football.
It is science that rejects in the most emphatic manner possible your fairytale.
And you are very lucky you live in USA a criminal shithole with no justice whatsoever,otherwise you and others like you would have locked in with Aldrin and the other crooks.
MickeyMouseApollo 3 months ago
@MickeyMouseApollo Ask the educated scientists.
YDDES 3 months ago
@MickeyMouseApollo Fact 1: I don't live in USA.
Fact 2: It's not me, it's scientists who say men has landed on Moon.
Fact 3: You are having a nightmare. Wake up!
YDDES 3 months ago
@YDDES
No scientist (or not scientist)ever research the authenticity of the moonlanding and found it true. ALL THE RESEARCHERS EVER HAVE FOUND IT TO BE A ....H-O-A-X !!! get use to it moron.
MickeyMouseApollo 3 months ago
@MickeyMouseApollo OK, tell me where to find the peer-reviewed scientifical reports stating that the moonlandings were faked,(SCIENTIFICAL means in wellknown Scientifical magazines), or admit You are a lying idiot.
YDDES 3 months ago
@YDDES
Look at the right of your screen moron. The world knows.
MickeyMouseApollo 3 months ago
@MickeyMouseApollo That was a silly answer. It only shows that You don't know what You are talking about. Just making up Your own realty.
I understand that You build Your view of reality on Youtube. I suspect it's too much to ask You to study scientifical journals and the likes...
YDDES 2 months ago 4
@YDDES
You are a very annoying little motherfucker aren't you? What science you talking there you fucking retard? People who don't know the radiation belts and people who don't know what solar corona is are going to the moon? SINCE FUCKING WHEN? What sort of fucking fairytale you talking here moron? Oh yeah! maybe Neil Armstrong wrote an article about the soda corolla. Perhaps he talks to people like you.But please keep your criminal propaganda away of our children moronic son of a bitch/
MickeyMouseApollo 2 months ago
@MickeyMouseApollo I'm talking about University professors and other well educated people. Bet they know A LOT more than You about radiation belts and solar coronas. And, how to build rockets and spaceships.
After all, it's those scientists, and not YOU, who have discovered and studied the radiation belts and all the problems with flights in space. You seems to just relay on those who make money by selling "hoax" books and videos to the gullible. Read some scientifical journals instead!
YDDES 2 months ago
@MickeyMouseApollo What have you rag heads done beside blowing people up who tell truth about islam? You go to democratic nations to ask for freedom, but when you get it, you start oppressing simple civil life by forbidding the truth to be told under the threat of death. Ragheaded fool!
Lachausis 2 months ago
Look how far the regolith travels from his foot at 0:19 and 0:42. To get that distance here on Earth, there would have to be a fair bit of air movement in the same direction as he is travelling. If it were a fine talc or cement it would be a frigging sandstorm or rather a talc storm. cont..
stampw0rx 4 months ago
@stampw0rx ...cont Only joking. That was one of my jobs there. Back then, I had to clean all the cement ahem..regolith from the suits at the end of the days filming. Around 23 toothbrushes per suit if memory serves and the sweat inside from the lighting gantries, jeepers that was a bad! It pooled in the boots which we poured into a bucket, oh the smell!! That Aldrins feet phewee!
stampw0rx 4 months ago
hahahahahaa
memo12088 4 months ago
0:00 - 0:17 Usain Bolt on the moon :D
poniatowski333 4 months ago
There is no evidence that we land on the moon only some crappy footage. Wy they dont go back with HD Cameras.
Mabye there is still a change for every one to be the first that land on the moon :D
djhappyyyyy 4 months ago
@djhappyyyyy
'There is no evidence that we land on the moon only some crappy footage. Wy they dont go back with HD Cameras.'
Are you REALLY that ignorant? There are mountains of evidence that prove we walked on the Moon. If you can't understand THAT, anything else would be easily rejected by your closed mind, anyway.
Monkeyboysdontknow 4 months ago
@Monkeyboysdontknow
Hi where can I find more evidence. I believe for such a big project, there must be a video recording from start to end; I mean the whole trip from earth to moon and then from moon back to earth. I think a short clip wouldn't be enough of an evidence, isn't it?
zmnali78 4 months ago
@zmnali78
I suggest the bautforum (dot) com conspiracy pages. The MHBs don't like it because there are REAL astronomers, physicists, thermo-dynamic experts, etc. that respond expertly to their ludicrous, ignorant claims. They provide plenty of references and examples. You can also go to NASA's site itself, or there is even an excellent serires of books that contain the Apollo 11 Mission logs that you can buy on-line. The third one has an amazing DVD included. Any questions?
Monkeyboysdontknow 4 months ago
@Monkeyboysdontknow
Thx for the reference. BTW, do you know how is it explained regarding the flag staying still without being pull by the gravity of the moon. While the more lighter sands / dusts kicked by the astronauts immediately falls back to the grounds and doesn't float or stay still in space like the flag is ?
zmnali78 4 months ago
@zmnali78
The Moon has gravity, just 1/6th that of Earth's. Dust falls immediately as there is no appreciable atmosphere to suspend it for any length of time. The flag hangs out straight because it is attached to a telescopic pole along the top length (on Apollo 11, the pole stuck before fully extending, thus giving the flag a 'rippled' look - later missions liked the look, so they never extended their rods fully).
Monkeyboysdontknow 4 months ago
@djhappyyyyy
Actually much of the footage and photos are beautiful, crisp and clear. You must be retarded to have not seen them.
Blahblobify 4 months ago
Well that was fun, now let me see who else I can go stir up... people are so easily agitated. :)
artzilla 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@artzilla
'Well that was fun, now let me see who else I can go stir up... people are so easily agitated. :)'
I see. Pretending to be a moron is YOUR idea of fun. Well, I don't think, you ARE pretending.
Monkeyboysdontknow 4 months ago
@americaisbroke one other thing is that the phenomenon of crossing ilght rays is different from atmospheric scattering which is caused by multiple reflections till the light intensity of one of the weaker source becomes almost zero. it's because the luminosity of the stronger light source gets scattered almost indefinitely while the weaker light is not enough to go on scattering without loss of lumens.
zambi007i 4 months ago
@americaisbroke the stars don't become visible because of the brightness. and the term brightness applies only to a planet with an atmosphere. on the moon in the absence of any atmos, the light reflecting off the surface would not scatter. and since crossing light rays don't cause interference in the other's path, the stars would be perfectly visible even during a lunar day.
the astronauts couldn't see them because of their gold visors. although i accept the apollo missions took place.
zambi007i 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/.bilderberger.ch
9/11 Inside Job-- Moonfake--Obama deception---Haarp--Chemtrails--Bilderberger---Illuminati---freemanson----2012 elenin nibiru planet x---Health and food---Aspartam---Coke)--Fluorid--Water) amalgam--Dents) Money storys)---Aids lie)---GENOZID Eugenics------ and much more Informations about the New World Order
Thumps up if u Like bilderberger.ch
leoboldekus 4 months ago
Cuz jumping around like monkeys , kicking rocks and driving kinda wreckless is exactly what NASA would consider safe to do in space, lol. WE DIDNT GO and its becoming more and more embarrasing to be called an American.
shermanr6 5 months ago
Something else that actually Proves this a hoax...the Flag is Flapping in the breeze. ? what breeze, there's no atmosphere on the moon. No air. So tell me how the flag is flapping? And no shadows either. But look, shadows. Ha!
artzilla 5 months ago
@artzilla
OMGWTFBBQ even the most brain dead hoaxers don't say anything about the flags motion because it's been explained PATIENTLY a million times since the very first 1969 broadcast when people asked about it.
And what's this silly shit you are claiming about there being no shadows on the moon? Are you really that stupid?
Blahblobify 4 months ago
@artzilla
first things first: the flag doesn't flap as in a breeze. the flag only oscillates randomly when the astronauts swivels the flagpole. when you have no air resistance, there's virtually nothing dampening the motion until the potential energy gets diminished over time.
secondly, shadows on the rugged and uneven moon surface can't be judged by our view of it thru 2d pictures and 2d videos. you can't do it on earth either. perspective on the moon is different altogether.
zambi007i 4 months ago
@artzilla and the flag isn't flapping. the effect is seen because of the low video quality. it's called apparent motion due pixelation. try to see the same from the nasa archives (some are hd vids) and you'll appreciate this.
zambi007i 4 months ago
even at 2x it doesnt look anything like it would look if filmed under wather lol
good to see vids like this to retionalise things
diviz0r 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch?v=NQfTh7UHxiw
The well known American moon hoax member Buzz Aldrin is a theorist. He assumes(and according to his theory we have to assume)that the Soviets had the ability to track Apollo..despite the fact these long ago extinct Soviet idiots couldn't spot a plane over Moscow even a whole 20 years after the time of the Apollo moon hoax/film/crime/fraud,or whatever you call it,of 1969 on which the theorist villain Aldrin played a center role.
potrodsas 5 months ago
The speech on 0:37 = most normal voice I've ever heard.
No I'm not sarcastic, how can you even think that?
Laurelindo 5 months ago
@americaisbroke LOL what a propaganda troll
Melville the Space Tourist said
"Seeing the bright blue sky turning pitch black and seeing stars appear while it is daytime is absolutely
mind blowing"
NASA MICKEY MOUSE TV
DeadJesus100 5 months ago
NASA MICKEY MOUSE
MOON LANIDNGS
1969-1972
DeadJesus100 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Im from serbia and im in hig school im love to be astronaut but in serba dont have this universyti .... evrewon hwo know the contry for astronauts please contact me on this e -mail govnar2@hotmail.com please im wona know wher is that universyti !
Krigerq 5 months ago
Just go watch some beach volley ball and watch the sand underneath those beautiful girls feet, but you might get distracted a bit by those nice tight athletic women's ass's
akaredcrossbow 5 months ago
@blahbloblfy. Hey cumhole explain too me, why the 195lb astronaut seems lighter than the sand and, falls the same way here on earth and he seems almost weightless. Um because you can't put a wire on the sand TARD
akaredcrossbow 5 months ago
@monkeyboysdontknow Well on the moon mass and weight should not matter they should fall at the same speed because of lack of air resistance. Did that answer your question hope so. Science I passed with all A's,as for spelling and punctuation that's a different story. lol
akaredcrossbow 5 months ago
What a bunch of BS!!! I would believe it if the moon sand would just stay floating a bit longer than the 195lb man with all of his equipment on LMFAO FAIL FAIL FAIL.
akaredcrossbow 5 months ago
@akaredcrossbow
' I would believe it if the moon sand would just stay floating a bit longer than the 195lb man with all of his equipment on LMFAO FAIL FAIL FAIL'
I can only assume your last 3 words indicate what you did in science class. Proof: Answer this question - In a vacuum subjected to uniform gravity (such as you and me here on Earth - OR the Moon) , which falls faster, a bird's feather, or a 200lb. anvil?
Monkeyboysdontknow 5 months ago
@akaredcrossbow
Pssst...hey dumbass....the sand wouldn't float because there's no air to suspend it, you hoaxturds are all so fuckass stupid it is hysterical
Blahblobify 5 months ago
Fake !
Jules87able 6 months ago
And if you think their movements at 2x speed look funny, you ought to see them at 2.45 x speed, which is the correct speed proportion between earth's gravity and the moon's. Of course the hoax nuts will say "Yeah but... yeah but... yeah but...," still without a clue what they're talking about, pushing themselves ever closer to real schizophrenia, as they try to rationalize away irrefutable evidence.
psparuliansinaga 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@americaisbroke you post such utter shit troll
Melville the Space Tourist said
"Seeing the bright blue sky turning pitch black and seeing stars appear while it is daytime is absolutely
mind blowing"
APOLLO NAZI TV DISNEY MOON HOAX
DeadJesus100 6 months ago
0:25...I cant do that!
Nostro200 6 months ago
hahahahaha , NO one reached to the moon , until this moment
MrMotamrd 6 months ago
Please tell me where are the billions of stars
adels2010alg 6 months ago
@adels2010alg In galaxies... that we can't see with our naked eye....
Okay, I'll be serious. The camera isn't showing stars because the moon is being hit by sun beams, making it bright, unless the camera had a high exposure mode, which most didn't back when this was made, the stars wouldn't appear because the camera would be focusing on the very bright moon, not the very faint stars. Take a picture of the night sky with a camera, most modern day cameras can't even see stars when it's night time
Halflifefan54 6 months ago
@Halflifefan54
On the moon there is no atmosfere so you can see the stars much much much much more clear.
Nostro200 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Nostro200 so why did armstrong the liar say he never saw stars on the moon?
on the Fake Apollo 11
DeadJesus100 6 months ago
@Nostro200 yes you can, if you were there maybe you could, but coz of the cameras they used to record astronauts as better as they can, these cameras wont be able to see mini lights such as stars, u got it? everything has an explanation...
Warmera 5 months ago
Comment removed
DuALTZz 7 months ago
typically the debunkers are those who just want to believe, they want that feeling of human achievement to hold onto sorta like religion, the others are people who work in the industry, who collect currency from this. if they were to just openly claim it was fake what value do they hold, they would be homeless in a matter of weeks. so the reality is while we'll never know and there will be misinformation agents on both sides, i think cynically about the whole process and believe it a sham.
ShitWrangler 7 months ago
y the flag is not moving in this video
riazafridi699 7 months ago
how come we never see stars in backround?
il0veacting 7 months ago
Guys it's been proven time and time again, and this video clip proves it further.. we have been to the moon, and you should be really proud humanity has achieved this astounding feat.
So stop with this conspiracy nonsense, you're just embarrassing yourselves. :3
afterhumanity333 7 months ago
@afterhumanity333 and when you realize that the governmant has lied to you about everything no one will stop you when you put the gun barrel in your mouth.
luckylongarm1 7 months ago
@luckylongarm1
You sir need help, the government can barely manage itself, let alone be in charge of these lame conspiracies.
afterhumanity333 7 months ago
@luckylongarm1 lol at your stupid gullible ass
luckylongarm1 7 months ago
This is real right? It doesn't seem so scary. When I was plugged into that virtual reality space porn, they were sticking much worse things than flags in the craters. I've said too much already.
ItsFantabulousGal 7 months ago
where is the stars !!!!!!!!
hiham55 8 months ago
@ 0:28 how is he able to stand up with and be at a 60 degree angle and not fall over and then start to spring forward and straghten up again? very odd looking. and don't give me any b.s. about the low gravity. low gravity shouldn't enable such an odd posture. just my opinon
timwik2 8 months ago
@timwik2-Learn about 1/6 G in a vaccum, son.
dalek14mc 8 months ago
@dalek14mc that must be my bad. he must be micheal jackson on the moon. LOL!
timwik2 7 months ago
@timwik2-well, look. If you look at the actual video, he is not on a flat surface, he's standing at an angle on a hill. That alone, can help him get up without the astronaut doing much of anything.
dalek14mc 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dalek14mc that must be my bad. he must be micheal jackson on the moon. LOL!
timwik2 7 months ago
@dalek14mc you make the comment in your video that everything the usa did was in the focus of the survival of man and the russians was in context of probes and unmanned missions. strange don't you think that everything in modern space exploration is about probes and unmanned missions. Lol! you contradict yourself in your own videos, son.
timwik2 7 months ago
@timwik2-It's funny how you stray off topic. I don't see how I contradict myself, everything I mentioned was within the premises of the space race, not modern missions, son. Learn how to listen to the context better, son.
dalek14mc 7 months ago
@timwik2 The laws of gravity do not change on the whim of your opinions.
MidgardEagle 8 months ago
@MidgardEagle but what if my opinion is you are a douche'? what do the laws of gravity say about that?
timwik2 7 months ago
watch?v=WhkJ0qD42Fo
Enough said.
RtGFuSiOn 8 months ago
haha man they really went out of there way to to prove they went to the moon,
ya back then some people would see this as reall and ya there is still a few today (not to cleaver) people that still think they did haha funny though nice try NASA short on funding lets try and fool people and go to the MOON haha!!
kevinjamesryan 8 months ago
@kevinjamesryan They obviously should've ditched Apollo and spent more money on English classes for the nation's youth...
MidgardEagle 8 months ago
They are like telletubbies
silvestir123 8 months ago
Super mario Galaxy!
sonic184 8 months ago
...like dangling on wires...
kworld01 8 months ago
If you want proof it was fake, check out Alan Sheppard playing golf. He drops 2nd ball and it falls in real time. He also claims to have improvised a 6 iron head onto his collector stick. Not as easy as it sounds.
ganstahfosho 8 months ago
Oops. I am sorry I read the description of your video and it seems you were trying to point to a different direction . It seems to me they are on our mother's earth. Nobody can jump unbalancedly sideways without falling flat on the ground no matter if gravity is a fraction of that on earth.
elvisinpersonator 8 months ago
The hoax is more than proved for me. However something that has not been commented on is the merry go lucky attitude of the guys in these films Being on the surface of the moon or any other planet's would make a man nervous and apprehensive, and fearful of the unknown, These guys seem at home, playful and ready to frolic and dance around. That's not credible.
elvisinpersonator 8 months ago
@elvisinpersonator Think of it this way. These guys just had one of their BIGGEST LIFE DREAMS come true. Their on the FUCKING moon for frak's sake! If I ended up on the moon like they did I would have been fucking ecstatic & excited too! U dont know how some1 will react UNTIL their in that situation so until u experience somethin like they did how about u keep ur narrow-minded opinions to urself. Until u can actually prove to me that the landing of the moon didnt take place, keep ur mouth shut.
TrueInnovator159 8 months ago
@TrueInnovator159
This freaking scam has been proved a hoax from all points of view: physics on the moon don't hold in their film, There are inconsistencies in their pictures, concerning lightning, size of things between one pic and the other, and even disappearing a reappearing lem sequences. AndI thought your vid adds to proving it. I already told you why. It's not my intention to offend you or convince you otherwise. But please respect freedom of expression.
elvisinpersonator 8 months ago
@elvisinpersonator Look I wont debate w/ u in this particular subject, it is COMPLETELY pointless. I have nothing against ur freedom of expres. whatsoever. What frustrates me is how many people, not saying that u do, seem 2 always rail some1 that believes in the moon landing & will go 2 considerable lengths 2 try 2 prove their point while not having the decency 2 accept or even respect that opposing individual's opinion or belief. Their essentially ignoring that persons freedom of expression.
TrueInnovator159 8 months ago
@elvisinpersonator And my apologies for coming off quite strong. I've been watching to many moon landing vids and kinda get pissed after reading a lot of ignorant posts by users on this website.
TrueInnovator159 8 months ago
@TrueInnovator159
Please also accept my apologies. I wouldn't have posted if I had realized you were a believer in the Moon landings. I did not realize it until I read the description after I had already posted. My bad.
elvisinpersonator 8 months ago
how the fuck can he lean forward with no hands? this guy must have been Zohans dad
michaelchristie2008 8 months ago
Lol this is NOT the moon, FAIL
MindstormRecs 9 months ago
Ha, ha! :D
Stop the video on 1:12
The flag is transparent? Where the flag actuely is?
Or there is no flag at all?
Please sombebody answere this!
vlaxifa 9 months ago
Anyone that believes this is the moon is retarded. Another lie set by America.
General01kyuubi 9 months ago
@General01kyuubi You're an idiot :)
bassfrontier 9 months ago
And if you think their movements at 2x speed look funny, you ought to see them at 2.45 x speed, which is the correct speed proportion between earth's gravity and the moon's. Of course the hoax nuts will say "Yeah but... yeah but... yeah but...," still without a clue what they're talking about, pushing themselves ever closer to real schizophrenia, as they try to rationalize away irrefutable evidence.
Case in point, check out the last few videos of arcangel4myke.
Astrobrant2 10 months ago 9
@Astrobrant2 Could you help me find the math for that? I want to know why it isn't 6X speed. This is a serious question, not being sarcastic.
newguy33X 5 months ago
@newguy33X (Pt 1) Sorry, I would have answered but Jarrah White filed more DMCAs on me after the first 21 were restored. This time he got my account suspended. But I'm back now.
Look at the units for gravitational acceleration: m/sec^2. It is that squared factor that causes the difference. The moon's is 1.63 and the earth's is 9.8 -- a factor of six. The force of gravity you feel is an acceleration, so this uses the time squared factor. (Distance per second per second)
cont'd...
Astrobrant2 5 months ago
@Astrobrant2 Time alone, is linear, though. For comparing time, distance, or average velocity differences between falling objects on the moon and earth, you need to take the square root of 6, or 2.45.
I'm not good enough to give you a demonstration with equations. I just understand the principle. Go to gravitycalc . com. You can play with figures for earth and moon. Put in the same distance for each and compare the times.
Astrobrant2 5 months ago
@Astrobrant2 exactly, and even if a video is slowed down 2.45 times, the resulting effect is more like a slow-motion we see in the movies. the hoaxers then try "ok, it should be 1.45 times" or some other such s**t. but one thing the hoaxers forget is the movement of regolith being kicked up and falling. the path is a perfect parabola without any slow-mo fx. and that more than vouches for the apollo authenticity.
i tried to explain the above to many hoaxers but they just wouldn't listen.
zambi007i 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Astrobrant2 the Propaganda Monkey
There is no evidence that man was ever on the moon douchebag
DeadJesus100 4 months ago
I see the question of being faked is addressed here.What are the radiation levels in space and would a human be able to survive.I work with radiation and I already know the answer.So what do you think?
letseeit7 10 months ago
It's obvious that the only thing "slowed down" about their movements are when things fall. their arm movements are as fast as they would be anywhere else. If you believe the moon landing was faked you have brain damage.
MrDominex 10 months ago
To all the conspiracy theorist nuts out there: How many times have you been in 5/6 the earths gravity? You must have been there at least once to know how fast they should, or shouldn't be moving. Speed up footage of the astronauts in the international space station, and you will get the same results. I'm sure you'll just claim that as a hoax too.
erk13z 10 months ago
it so fake .....he running too fast and . the astronaut getting up with the help of the cable rig... little thing like this just show you they fake it all
THREESIXNINE100 10 months ago
Well, the point of speeding up the video is to prove that it was faked. That the astronauts were moving at normal speed in their space-suits, and that the footage was then slowed down, and given a 'voice-over'.
But of course, there is the counter argument, that if it was faked, and slowed down, that the arm movements of the astronauts seems to be moving faster than normal.
Imagicka 10 months ago
that's funny to speed up but that's all. -_-'
Floxit72 10 months ago
wtf are yall white people doing on the moon. get off from there ya here? crazy white folks...
phattown213 11 months ago
@phattown213
we haven't been to the moon for 38 years.
crazy black folks....
SuperCorey95 11 months ago
lol they spend our taxes on this shit, they should at least get to another galaxy, bunch of useless fags
spartan1081990 11 months ago
Sure, its ok. But its no Benny Hill.
kaderoder 11 months ago
before i thought its not true. now i know its not a hoax, its real we landed in the moon. they hired people to make it fake. coz theres a top secret in the moon that they dont want people know.
fredd3100 11 months ago
@fredd3100 are you stupid or something
izurz 11 months ago
I have a question about the 2nd part of the flim clip. When Astronaut walks up to the flag.
How come the flags shadow is on his back? Also looks like they walk through the flag pole as you can see it still infront of them..Any ideas??
mixsterfranky 11 months ago
@mixsterfranky - The flag is much closer than you're assuming it to be. The poor quality of this movie clip makes it hard to see, but if you look carefully you will see that the bottom of the flagpole is lower than it initially appears in that clip.
You can see the flagpole more clearly here;
/watch?v=ZgGFU1oDxAE
There's a dark section on the flagpole that blends in with the moon's surface, but you can see the bottom of the flagpole (roughly level with the feet of the astronaut who jumps).
MTMind2 10 months ago
@CT2507 ...how really humen body and physics would work there in a particular situation
grubens80 11 months ago
@CT2507 The second part. I know what you mean PIVOTING. This few frames can really look weird but we haven`t been there for long (on haven`t been at all - still possible) so we cannot say for sure that some gravity , mass and vacuum(!) properties cannot create such impression. For us it is unknown how really human body and physics would work there.
grubens80 11 months ago
@CT2507 I agree with the jump simulation part. It can be done on wires ok. But it also can be done on moon right? It would be very hard to get exact of 1.62m/s free fall impression. I`m not an idiot i`m open to other way of thinking and i don`t say it is not a hoax we just don`t have VERY CLEAR evidence. If u have software and knowlegde to do this please can you try to count what is the free fall time at least we can then try to say is it possible or not.
grubens80 11 months ago
Next thing...2x video from 1:44 if thos was done 2x faster in original the jump would look different..again gravity of the moon is MUCH LESS then on earth (basic education) as u can see on this video when astronaut jumps up and then falling down the jump to highest point and fall takes about same time or fall takes a little bit longer than jump. On earth try to jump you will fall much faster when hitting highest point of jump.
grubens80 11 months ago
@grubens80 idiot. with wires u can simulate that jump so u fall at the same speed, and it is what they did. u have no argument. open your eyes instead and LOOK at what's on the film. it screams wires, wires, WIIIIIIIIIIRES !!!!
my God, u people are like religious fanatics. and i know. i've met my share of them in my life.
CT2507 11 months ago
such an angle is only possible to sustain IF one is lifted up by the help of wires!!" the angle is possible cause moon has much less gravity than earth so it is possible to do that on the moon. You would then need abouy 1/6 strenght to go to vertical position from bended position. try to do it home.No succes? Now imagine you weight 60kg here on earth - on the moon you would weight like 10kg but you have the same muscle power. Would you be able to do Michael Jackson`s "Thriller" move ? YES
grubens80 11 months ago
@grubens80 watch at 0:27 right after he gets up, he doesn't turn, but pivots on his centre axis!
and watch again at the part with fast speed. at 0:47 its very clear. the astronot is PIVOTING right after he gets up. not turning, but P-I-V-O-T-I-N-G!!! get it!!
lunar gravity has nothing to do with such a move. only wires. frigging WIRES, as in W-I-R-E-S, can make u turn like that.
Damn, it pisses me off that so many of u are so blind! i wouldn't trust on u guys to sell me an ice-cream!
CT2507 11 months ago
hehehe... watch the stupid angle his body is in when he gets up from that fall at 0:26 ! :))
such an angle is only possible to sustain IF one is lifted up by the help of wires!!
besides, why are the astronauts moving in slow-motion? and im not only talking of his silly bunny-jumps, but his head and arms too. compare with the Russian and american space walks!! they don't happen in slow-motion!
cheers suckers! :)
CT2507 11 months ago
@CT2507 Cyprus is a stronghold for the lizard people. You can't trick us, lizard, you're all scales and shit, fake as fake can be. Heh, thought you were slick, didn't you, lizard? I thought so.
cheers suckers! :|
SlipSloop 11 months ago
@SlipSloop sure we have lizards. we have goats. and we have batty-boys like u who fuck the goats sometimes...but not all of us like to watch. some like to participate also!
my family have a donkey which we keep mainly for the fucking. donkeys have big dicks, and sometimes we invite only the females of our family, and let the donkey get down on them...while we men enjoy tea with olives. which is nice cause then the women are calm for at least a week.
what do u do for fun and pleasure?
cheers.
CT2507 11 months ago
@CT2507 You must fuck a lot of goats.
SlipSloop 11 months ago
@SlipSloop well, yes. but not only goats!
what are your favourites?
cheers.. ;)
CT2507 11 months ago