look seen one seen them all , how about footage of nz dash 8s ,as we dont get to see them here and some aircraft that are actualy cool and go places as apposed to buzzing around the same airport making noise.
@astein1912 By the time the F-35's are here, our FA-18A/B's will be rooted mate. The aircraft are already showing problems with there centre barrel rolls due to the high g loads they have been through in the past 25 years. Also, we wouldn't just 'give' NZ our planes. NZ is not in the postion to operate fighters, and probably won't ever be again. Once you have stopped operating fast jets, it is extremely difficult and expensive to start over.
@aussiepride2005 ahhh ok fair enough. i actually never knew about the centre barrel roll problem, hope they will last until 2015 or so when the F-35's arrive!
@Steino1912 They will last through to the early 2020's, until the F-35's become fully operational. But whether the F-35 will be here by that time is another issue. This week an Australian team is heading over to America to discuss some issues surrounding the F-35 and the potential delays that might arise with Lockheed. If the F-35 gets delayed again, we have no choice but to buy more Super Hornets because the Classics will be fucked by the 2020's and will need replacing...
@aussiepride2005 the f/a 18's will be transferred, and altered, and become the EA/18 growler, for Electronic Fighter. these are planned to begin, upon first arrival of the F35 A's, and will stay in service until 2024. These planes have a lifespan of 25 years, and can be modified, but not as noticable, to 35 years through it. though the air force doesn't plan to keep them that long. also, there will be no plans to buy additional F/A 18 E/F's as the F/A 18 Hornets are still in very good condition.
I reckon, when Australia's first JSF's begin to arrive, and the Hornets are being dumped, give them to NZ. It gives them fight jets, and inturn basically will double Australia and New Zealand's military capabilities as our forces are already combined as it is.
I find it fascinating that when they come into land...they look like they have bugger all wing area, and yet they seem to have enough lift to make a rather smooth landing at such a slow speed...great aircraft.... good vid too...
@ceskazbrojovka17HMR i never said they were replacing our entire air combat force, i just said that they were upgrading the f-18 to super hornets and then eventuall to f 35 lightnings.
why are we buyin F 35s when we could just buy 100 or so F/A 18Fs? easier integration with the RAAF, and a cheaper and somewhat more capable option.
Buy a third canberra class LHD and 30 or so STOVL F35Bs and another two Hobart class destroyers and there is our long range striking power. Not to mention u could fit the F35Bs with buddy refueling and then u got a movable fuel station for the super hornets?
@deccas1391 the F35 is primarily designed as a strike fighter; so yes its fully air to ground capable. It does however lack significant close in dogfighting capabilities. While every 4.5 generation fighter coming out of Russia and many other countries possess thrust vectoring, the F35 lacks this. It is a compromised design in its nature.
@Pirofutura yeah but politicians r idiots and besides the Canberra classes wouldn't b ably to operate them they may have ski jump but none of the other facilities e.g. arming& refuelling stations it would b easier 2 buy a wasp or america class off the U.S of possibly even a Queen Elizabeth class off the brits it would b cheaper cus they are in need of jobs and cant afford their 2nd carrier anyway.
to this strykes guy... to make it clear, im not against australia, i'm an australian and nz citizen, but why do you assume china will ever start a war? i mean... which major war has china EVER started? so i cant comprehend why china would be a threat if you dont intend to threaten them? of course, if any nation threatens china, they're probably retarded
I was just using them as a figure.. A bad one at that.
I know they have no capability to do so.
Oh and, China has threatened war, it claims that Tiwan is part of it, Tiwan and the US say otherwise (Catch the drift?). Although thats not really involving Aus.
china wouldnt risk war for taiwan. War is bad for business and even though china claims to be communist, business is everything to them. Besides taiwan and china are joined so close econimically, there is very little reason for war other than national prestige or the like
9Mikoyan: As for Australia, the only country that has the power projection capability to be able to be able to successfully invade is the USA, and that is unlikely. It takes a considerable amount of logistical capability to be able to move a lot of troops across water, and even more to keep them there. In any case, if money is any guide Australia does have some military capability to defend itself considering it outspends all of its immediate neighbours combined together.
Even if NZ were given a/c for free, the day to day operating costs would blow the defence budget. The NZDF aren't getting any more money in a hurry, so anyone who still hangs on to the dream of NZ having a strike force is smoking the wrong stuff and should educate themselves on how NZ's foreign policy governs its Defence policy. In that you'll find no requirement for a strike force.
In my opinion, I know it don't really count but hey you can hear it anyway, RNZAF needs some form of fighter.
24 Block 60 F16's would come in at about $3.5 billion AUD with 10 years support, (Approx, we spent $6 Billion AUD on 24 F/A18F [with 10 years support] which cost twice as much as F16E/F's)
[Per aircraft]
F/A 18E/F = $65 Million USD
F16E/F (Block 60's) = $30 Million USD
The F16E/F's are very capable aircraft, better than the US' Block 52 + C/D's.
If push came to shove and Australia or New Zealand were attacked by anyone it would all be over in a matter of minutes anyway. If you are going to have an air force it needs to total more than a handfull. And who in their right mind would bother anyway.
Aust has 20 F111s active the other 15 airframes are /where for parts the F111s are being retired as the Super hornets come online! Aust only has 70 older Hornets as 5 have crashed and the 100 F35s will replace all the new and old hornets so the RAAF will only have about 100 fontline fighters / stike aircraft not the 234 you make out
@jason090874 sometimes they count the Hawk 127 trainers, they can be given some light combat capability but that would only bring up the combat jet amount to around 130 ish'
"If push came to shove and Australia or New Zealand were attacked by anyone it would all be over in a matter of minutes anyway"
Define anyone? A super power, perhaps,but Indonesia? Malaysia? It's unlikely we would be fighting alone anyway, as we have alliances with US and England. Having our own equipment and 80,000 troops means we're not a child who has to call for daddies help but can at least hurl a couple of blows; with our 100 5th gen aircraft and future 12 submarines carrying midget subs
2. (used with a negative or a question) a person of any importance is he anyone in this town?
3. (often preceded by just) any person at random; no matter who
It is quite unlikely that you will be fighting full stop. The last war was in 1945, all of the others were police actions where the so-called superpowers postured. Nice hardware is a complete waste of money in this day and age.
If war does break out between the US, Aus, Japan, NZ, South Korea, Tiwan (ect) against China (And probably North Korea), our only threat from planes would be carriers. Even then it's a very slim chance as Japan, SK and Tiwan would be the first targets for them. If war did break out, by the time they posed a real air threat to Aus/NZ/Malaysia the US would have based aircraft in Aus/Malaysia.
RAAF is a good strength, we can defend ourselfs and provide offensive capabilites in our region where needed.
Just because there is currently no major war does not mean the threat is not there.
As people have said here before, keeping a capable AF is not parranoia.
I'm sure it also helps both the countries pride (Of independence {Don't say were not independant due to the Commonweath.}) and the members of the ADF, i'm sure NZ's morale (in the NZDF anyway) droped when they lost their fighters.
@0Strykes. Seems that you answered your own question. The only way that Aus would/could be attacked is from the sea. Then it is pointless having billions tied up in military hardware. Russia does not need carrier because there strength is in self defence. The only country that could launch a major attack on anywhere is the US. Mobilization is the name of the game. It is also quite pointless to have F111's to bomb yourself. War is a thing of the past.
No body needs a gun until you need a gun. Then that ugly looking thing of unnecessary thing of violence and death starts to look very attractive. New Zealand is going to be around for a long time it is'nt a matter of if we get attacked it's when.. we live on earth on ww3 is looming
I dont understand why we dont invest in some jets for our defence, they're not an offensive weapon unless you have a carrier which obviously we wont. So much better when you have this much coastline to guard
Yes but the same thought applies to ships aswell. It dos'nt change the fact that you would get moe defensive bang for your buck through spending that on aircraft.
Yes maybe it would'nt stop a large invasion but it's something and in a world of many allies it's great for us to contribute properly to our own defence rather than letting someone else pick up the bill if it ever was to happen, don't you think?
The base for these are near Brisbane, these five and a fleet of f111's will be doing laps together and buzzing around Brisbane and the Gold coast, should be a cool sight
@H3NZHN It was mate and we were pushing back just after your film ends. Hey, my passengers did not mind the few min delay. They were keen to see what was going on out the window :)
Live in Papatoetoe, saw them come in low overhead.approx 17.30-17.45. Heard them b4 seeing them, louder than any 747. Awesome sight, great capture h3nzhn. The c-17 was massive. Just a note, 4 hornets will be displaying at wings over wanaka at easter.
Do you wonder why this was a short notice arrival? Changed travel plans from Hawaii? I predict the NZ government is seriously considering these fighters and fixing the f*ckup Helen did which ruined our Air Force.
@dauntless111 i wonder if the NZ government would consider buying some of the better condition F/A-18A/B's from the RAAF after they are retired, they would still be good.
We have 24 of them...Woohoo,,,,!
ausmyothu 1 month ago
look seen one seen them all , how about footage of nz dash 8s ,as we dont get to see them here and some aircraft that are actualy cool and go places as apposed to buzzing around the same airport making noise.
MrFattyfatfatboy 3 months ago
why would they fly into Auckland international? why not an air force base?
Russ07 8 months ago
@astein1912 By the time the F-35's are here, our FA-18A/B's will be rooted mate. The aircraft are already showing problems with there centre barrel rolls due to the high g loads they have been through in the past 25 years. Also, we wouldn't just 'give' NZ our planes. NZ is not in the postion to operate fighters, and probably won't ever be again. Once you have stopped operating fast jets, it is extremely difficult and expensive to start over.
aussiepride2005 9 months ago
@aussiepride2005 ahhh ok fair enough. i actually never knew about the centre barrel roll problem, hope they will last until 2015 or so when the F-35's arrive!
Steino1912 9 months ago
@Steino1912 They will last through to the early 2020's, until the F-35's become fully operational. But whether the F-35 will be here by that time is another issue. This week an Australian team is heading over to America to discuss some issues surrounding the F-35 and the potential delays that might arise with Lockheed. If the F-35 gets delayed again, we have no choice but to buy more Super Hornets because the Classics will be fucked by the 2020's and will need replacing...
aussiepride2005 9 months ago
@aussiepride2005 the f/a 18's will be transferred, and altered, and become the EA/18 growler, for Electronic Fighter. these are planned to begin, upon first arrival of the F35 A's, and will stay in service until 2024. These planes have a lifespan of 25 years, and can be modified, but not as noticable, to 35 years through it. though the air force doesn't plan to keep them that long. also, there will be no plans to buy additional F/A 18 E/F's as the F/A 18 Hornets are still in very good condition.
imnotamexican1 1 month ago
I reckon, when Australia's first JSF's begin to arrive, and the Hornets are being dumped, give them to NZ. It gives them fight jets, and inturn basically will double Australia and New Zealand's military capabilities as our forces are already combined as it is.
thetyler1212 11 months ago
I find it fascinating that when they come into land...they look like they have bugger all wing area, and yet they seem to have enough lift to make a rather smooth landing at such a slow speed...great aircraft.... good vid too...
fjbutch 11 months ago
@ceskazbrojovka17HMR i never said they were replacing our entire air combat force, i just said that they were upgrading the f-18 to super hornets and then eventuall to f 35 lightnings.
Vermen1 1 year ago
cool vid man, AUS needed to upgrade its jet fighters,
Vermen1 1 year ago
@Vermen1 They're not replacing our entire air combat force.
ceskazbrojovka17HMR 1 year ago
five year old lip syncs and dances to the old school,type it in the search box
MaryMacintosh1 1 year ago
why are we buyin F 35s when we could just buy 100 or so F/A 18Fs? easier integration with the RAAF, and a cheaper and somewhat more capable option.
Buy a third canberra class LHD and 30 or so STOVL F35Bs and another two Hobart class destroyers and there is our long range striking power. Not to mention u could fit the F35Bs with buddy refueling and then u got a movable fuel station for the super hornets?
Pirofutura 1 year ago
@Pirofutura I agree. Can the F-35 even do A/G?
deccas1391 1 year ago
@deccas1391 the F35 is primarily designed as a strike fighter; so yes its fully air to ground capable. It does however lack significant close in dogfighting capabilities. While every 4.5 generation fighter coming out of Russia and many other countries possess thrust vectoring, the F35 lacks this. It is a compromised design in its nature.
Pirofutura 1 year ago
@Pirofutura yeah but politicians r idiots and besides the Canberra classes wouldn't b ably to operate them they may have ski jump but none of the other facilities e.g. arming& refuelling stations it would b easier 2 buy a wasp or america class off the U.S of possibly even a Queen Elizabeth class off the brits it would b cheaper cus they are in need of jobs and cant afford their 2nd carrier anyway.
jimmymohoney 5 months ago
to this strykes guy... to make it clear, im not against australia, i'm an australian and nz citizen, but why do you assume china will ever start a war? i mean... which major war has china EVER started? so i cant comprehend why china would be a threat if you dont intend to threaten them? of course, if any nation threatens china, they're probably retarded
Prodigy19921 1 year ago
I was just using them as a figure.. A bad one at that.
I know they have no capability to do so.
Oh and, China has threatened war, it claims that Tiwan is part of it, Tiwan and the US say otherwise (Catch the drift?). Although thats not really involving Aus.
0Strykes0 1 year ago
china wouldnt risk war for taiwan. War is bad for business and even though china claims to be communist, business is everything to them. Besides taiwan and china are joined so close econimically, there is very little reason for war other than national prestige or the like
Pirofutura 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9Mikoyan: As for Australia, the only country that has the power projection capability to be able to be able to successfully invade is the USA, and that is unlikely. It takes a considerable amount of logistical capability to be able to move a lot of troops across water, and even more to keep them there. In any case, if money is any guide Australia does have some military capability to defend itself considering it outspends all of its immediate neighbours combined together.
RabbitKiller76 1 year ago
Comment removed
RabbitKiller76 1 year ago
Even if NZ were given a/c for free, the day to day operating costs would blow the defence budget. The NZDF aren't getting any more money in a hurry, so anyone who still hangs on to the dream of NZ having a strike force is smoking the wrong stuff and should educate themselves on how NZ's foreign policy governs its Defence policy. In that you'll find no requirement for a strike force.
BTW - nice video - good catch.
ejvideos07 1 year ago
In my opinion, I know it don't really count but hey you can hear it anyway, RNZAF needs some form of fighter.
24 Block 60 F16's would come in at about $3.5 billion AUD with 10 years support, (Approx, we spent $6 Billion AUD on 24 F/A18F [with 10 years support] which cost twice as much as F16E/F's)
[Per aircraft]
F/A 18E/F = $65 Million USD
F16E/F (Block 60's) = $30 Million USD
The F16E/F's are very capable aircraft, better than the US' Block 52 + C/D's.
Who agrees? "D
0Strykes0 1 year ago
Comment removed
0Strykes0 1 year ago
Comment removed
0Strykes0 1 year ago
If push came to shove and Australia or New Zealand were attacked by anyone it would all be over in a matter of minutes anyway. If you are going to have an air force it needs to total more than a handfull. And who in their right mind would bother anyway.
29Mikoyan 1 year ago
Australia has 35 f111 bombers, 75 FA18 hornets, 24 FA18 super hornets and 100+ F35 stealth fighters on order
Russ07 1 year ago
@Russ07, As I said, a handfull.
29Mikoyan 1 year ago
Aust has 20 F111s active the other 15 airframes are /where for parts the F111s are being retired as the Super hornets come online! Aust only has 70 older Hornets as 5 have crashed and the 100 F35s will replace all the new and old hornets so the RAAF will only have about 100 fontline fighters / stike aircraft not the 234 you make out
jason090874 1 year ago
@jason090874 sometimes they count the Hawk 127 trainers, they can be given some light combat capability but that would only bring up the combat jet amount to around 130 ish'
Sasquatch279 8 months ago
@jason090874 And 4 Hornet's have crashed, not 5.
aussiepride2005 8 months ago
"If push came to shove and Australia or New Zealand were attacked by anyone it would all be over in a matter of minutes anyway"
Define anyone? A super power, perhaps,but Indonesia? Malaysia? It's unlikely we would be fighting alone anyway, as we have alliances with US and England. Having our own equipment and 80,000 troops means we're not a child who has to call for daddies help but can at least hurl a couple of blows; with our 100 5th gen aircraft and future 12 submarines carrying midget subs
PR0GRAMMING 1 year ago
@programming.
anyone [ˈɛnɪˌwʌn -wən]
pron
1. any person; anybody
2. (used with a negative or a question) a person of any importance is he anyone in this town?
3. (often preceded by just) any person at random; no matter who
It is quite unlikely that you will be fighting full stop. The last war was in 1945, all of the others were police actions where the so-called superpowers postured. Nice hardware is a complete waste of money in this day and age.
29Mikoyan 1 year ago
Just remember the only thing stoping most major wars is nuclear deterrents.
Once they are gone (Which many countries are pushing for) the threat of the world being destroyed (By nukes) is gone.
By the way, why is our hand full no good?
The Chinese have 1 carrier (And 1~2 On order?) The Russians have 2 (Only 1 in service).
Each of those carriers hold some 75 fighters.
Carriers would be the only way Australia could have a major air threat.
0Strykes0 1 year ago
If war does break out between the US, Aus, Japan, NZ, South Korea, Tiwan (ect) against China (And probably North Korea), our only threat from planes would be carriers. Even then it's a very slim chance as Japan, SK and Tiwan would be the first targets for them. If war did break out, by the time they posed a real air threat to Aus/NZ/Malaysia the US would have based aircraft in Aus/Malaysia.
0Strykes0 1 year ago
RAAF is a good strength, we can defend ourselfs and provide offensive capabilites in our region where needed.
Just because there is currently no major war does not mean the threat is not there.
As people have said here before, keeping a capable AF is not parranoia.
I'm sure it also helps both the countries pride (Of independence {Don't say were not independant due to the Commonweath.}) and the members of the ADF, i'm sure NZ's morale (in the NZDF anyway) droped when they lost their fighters.
0Strykes0 1 year ago
@0Strykes. Seems that you answered your own question. The only way that Aus would/could be attacked is from the sea. Then it is pointless having billions tied up in military hardware. Russia does not need carrier because there strength is in self defence. The only country that could launch a major attack on anywhere is the US. Mobilization is the name of the game. It is also quite pointless to have F111's to bomb yourself. War is a thing of the past.
29Mikoyan 1 year ago
Comment removed
0Strykes0 1 year ago
What was the reason for this? NZ doesnt have terrorist's. Was it the convoy of troops returning from Afghanistan, via Aussie?
pacmania09 1 year ago
No body needs a gun until you need a gun. Then that ugly looking thing of unnecessary thing of violence and death starts to look very attractive. New Zealand is going to be around for a long time it is'nt a matter of if we get attacked it's when.. we live on earth on ww3 is looming
unkybrad 1 year ago
Brand new F18's flying from California via Hawaii and NZ to Australia.
29Mikoyan 1 year ago
OOSH they must have heaps of chups onboard.
niggawilde 1 year ago
yea bro.... hard
komodose 1 year ago
i thought we were being invaded when they flew over our house :P lol jk
AngryMonk60 1 year ago
No need to invade when kiwis want to be Australia's 7th state :-)
Russ07 1 year ago
@Russ07 dream on most kiwis think aussies weird lol
theosthebest 1 year ago
This videos taken off!
Can't wait for tomorrow's departure (on You Tube because NZ mainstream media seem to be ignoring our Aussie mates).
nighthawk006phoenix 1 year ago
I dont understand why we dont invest in some jets for our defence, they're not an offensive weapon unless you have a carrier which obviously we wont. So much better when you have this much coastline to guard
unkybrad 1 year ago
lol, because it would take much more than just "some jets" to defend against an enemy who has the power projection to come and get you.
GeneralChristoff 1 year ago
Yes but the same thought applies to ships aswell. It dos'nt change the fact that you would get moe defensive bang for your buck through spending that on aircraft.
Yes maybe it would'nt stop a large invasion but it's something and in a world of many allies it's great for us to contribute properly to our own defence rather than letting someone else pick up the bill if it ever was to happen, don't you think?
unkybrad 1 year ago
The Kiwis can always use there 757s in a fight LoL .I could never understand why your ex-Lesbian PM Axed the order for F16s
jason090874 1 year ago
nice vid mate/Where are the hornets from.
bomberboy242 1 year ago
Comment removed
ahparsy 1 year ago
Great video and filming.
Don't worry kiwi friends,we aussies will watch your back as usual.lol.
satos1 1 year ago
@satos1
lol! kiwis still rock :D u never no one day we might get a propper defence force!
666psycosocial666 1 year ago
There's more to come....this was first round only.
UtdMan4eva 1 year ago
The base for these are near Brisbane, these five and a fleet of f111's will be doing laps together and buzzing around Brisbane and the Gold coast, should be a cool sight
Russ07 1 year ago
was in the top floor of the domestic terminal
managed to get some nice footage also of the Super Hornets coming in was so so sweet .. beautiful aircraft !!
CarAudioGuy21 1 year ago
Hell of a long way to fly from Hawaii. probably had to refuel 3 or maybe 4 times. Cant get out and stretch your legs either.
29Mikoyan 1 year ago
Love the video mate! Was nice to see them here yesterday even if they did delay our pushback a few mins :)
DarrenMasters 1 year ago
cheers - was yours the JSTAR A320 parked closest to the Hornets Parking spot?.
H3NZHN 1 year ago
@H3NZHN It was mate and we were pushing back just after your film ends. Hey, my passengers did not mind the few min delay. They were keen to see what was going on out the window :)
DarrenMasters 1 year ago
Story at:
stuff(dot)co(dot)nz/national/3501700/Australias-new-jet-fighters-parked-in-Auckland
nighthawk006phoenix 1 year ago
@nighthawk006phoenix meh, doesn't link. Just search Stuff(dot)co(dot)nz for "Australia's new jet fighters parked in Auckland"
nighthawk006phoenix 1 year ago
Live in Papatoetoe, saw them come in low overhead.approx 17.30-17.45. Heard them b4 seeing them, louder than any 747. Awesome sight, great capture h3nzhn. The c-17 was massive. Just a note, 4 hornets will be displaying at wings over wanaka at easter.
pliberated1 1 year ago
Very cool
intertr0ns 1 year ago
Great video footage, what time roughly was this??? Wondered why the viewing area was so packed when went past in the truck
R580NZ 1 year ago
between approx 5.10pm - 5.45pm
H3NZHN 1 year ago
do you know what time they leave on Friday morning ?
CarAudioGuy21 1 year ago
it certainly is an unusual sight for New Zealand. oh how I wish we had some our own.
Shame than NZ see's no value in having a least a small amount of Jet fighters....sigh.
dauntless111 1 year ago 7
Do you wonder why this was a short notice arrival? Changed travel plans from Hawaii? I predict the NZ government is seriously considering these fighters and fixing the f*ckup Helen did which ruined our Air Force.
OakmanNZ 1 year ago
@OakmanNZ do we have a spare 24 billion for 24 aircraft?
ahparsy 1 year ago
No but who is talking about 24?
OakmanNZ 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no1 gives a shit bout ur gay country theres no pointin havin fighter jets lol
71falconGTHO 1 year ago
@71falconGTHO Next time we'll just let yours ditch in the Tasman then.
zuss10r 1 year ago
I don't know what NZ pollies are thinking. It's almost as if they think NZ's not worth defending.
PR0GRAMMING 1 year ago
@dauntless111 i wonder if the NZ government would consider buying some of the better condition F/A-18A/B's from the RAAF after they are retired, they would still be good.
Sasquatch279 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sasquatch279 Read what I said below...
aussiepride2005 8 months ago
@Sasquatch279 By the Time the RAAF will retire the F/A 18 hornets, they will be out dated, and too old, like the F-111's
imnotamexican1 1 month ago
Great vid, Interesting that they landed at Auckland.
solaklnz 1 year ago 2
nice work!
nighthawk006phoenix 1 year ago
thanks for excellent vid here. Did you catch callsigns?
mcmaster199 1 year ago
Mcmaster199 - No unfortunately .
H3NZHN 1 year ago
Awesome capture, good work mate!
thekiwicanuck 1 year ago
It's interesting to see those guys here. good job mate
Ashvegian 1 year ago 2
fukn mint, wonder why they didnt just go to nzwp
pilotgallagher01 1 year ago
Awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nzeddy 1 year ago