This isn't proof anymore than pictures of aliens in modern media are proof of their existence. People are creative and they make up monsters. Hell, some of them could have found fossilized dinosaurs. The fact of the matter is that there is an overwhelming amount of evidence pointing to the fact that humans are relatively new and dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago, and pictures of very dubious "ancient" art proves absolutely nothing.
@multisnootylives1 The global media like TV broadcast and newspaper firms are controlled by supporters of evolution (no god) theory so anything that conflict that ideal will not be declared publicly. Neil Armstrong ever hinted that truth has many protective layers in our society so not all truths are shown but guarded from the public to satisfy an agenda.
most of these are proven hoaxes and were carved very recently(so were the foot prints in texas) but of course some poeple will grasp at anything and cling to falseities to feel secure that thier mythology is correct and true. it happened is history past and it is happening today.it is very tough tto give up a beliefe system no matter what the evidence.thier minds bend,twist and make up info to protect thier belief
@cdickenson64 Ya but but the images on those walls & hieroglyphs aren't fake, what do u call legends of Dragons & humans slaying them? This is not just a foklore legend it is true!! Furthermore Dinosaurs still exist today in not fully unexplored parts of the World like the Congo & Amazon! New unidentified species are constantly being discovered! Ancient man called what we call today Dinosaurs, Dragons because the word didn't exist in the English language until the mid 19th Century!
@To411u Proof??? Dinosaurs in the Congo? and the Amazon?? Why haven't we found them with all this encroachment and deforestation?
By the way a living dinosaur is commonly called an alligator or crocodile... And if you believe science, like I do... Birds are decedents of dinosaurs... But that does not mean the big ones walked with humans... A hieroglyphic picture isn't proof enough.
@cdickenson64 Huh what do u mean? Theres alot of places that haven't been deforestated there, don't be deceived by Science, or better yet Satan. You underestimated the size of the Congo Jungle, Its far bigger than most people thing, infact its bigger than several states.. & The Amazon has a river that is 7 miles wide in some parts, & Birds being decendants of Dinosaurs is Nonsense, do you know how different the 2 are? Thats total bull!! & ya actually it is, sorry I won't read it but..
@cdickenson64 Humans where different than you think Thousands of years ago.. Infact humans where bigger around the time of the Dinosaurs.. Did u know that Reptiles never stop growing there entire lives? Because b4 the Pre-Flood world there was a canopy of 50% more oxygen that allowed humans & Dinosaurs to live longer.. How is it that when they find Ancient Dragonflies eggs or other bugs there packed with 50% more oxygen?
@cdickenson64 damn you are so gullible!!! You listen to some preacher tell you he knows more than a scientist/satan(that's another argument for a different day), and you believe him because why would he lie? He's reads from a book that was written 600 to 800 years ago and 200 or more years after the main character died and left no physical evidence of his existence short of some far fetched stories.
@To411u following that logic, we're going to discover aliens soon also too since on mayan art there were also some round objects that some people think looked like U.f.o's but don't tell that to a creationist, he'll say that these are demons and just tricks of the devil. They called them demons and no, it's not folklore.those are in fact ALIENS my little christian friends!
Damn..."Scientists" have successfully brainwashed sheeple to satisfy their 'nerd sexy' ways and attempt to conquer again, more sheeple, that now most sheeple just accept what they say blindly. I suppose if they told you to kill your handicapped offspring, sheeple would. LMFAO
@spookerr "I suppose if they told you to kill your handicapped offspring, sheeple would." That was what Abraham was going to do to his healthy son. And he wasn't an atheist. Please explain.
The crockery is pottery made for tourists in Peru and the rest of the pictures are subject to interpretation. Dinosaurs had been extinct for tens of millions of years before humans evolved. People tend to underestimate the intelligence of ancient man. The Greeks and Romans and Chinese actually had museums dedicated to dinosaur bones. They interpreted them in art and did for the most part an astounding job. This video is poppycock.
I love these videos, these pictures are amazing. I expect nothing less from young earth believers who lead their whole life following a book. If these pictures are proof dinosaurs walked with man than I guess Lizard men are real also, UFO's visited often and bird like men, serpent men and winged dogs existed also. If this is the path you wish to go then by accepting these as proof you can not deny the other pictures we find around the globe depicting strange humanoid figures and events.
There are both footprints in limestone in Texas.. to make limestone it takes 2300 deg on calcium carbonate there were no volcano and the vast amount of limestone in that area only points to the astroid and the prints are all moving in the same area. Go to five mile damn south of Kyle Texas and ask any of the locals there they will show you both.. in the limestone.. you can tell they "were," running in mud.
Because man wiped them out with hunting. So you are saying that we hunted the dinosaurs to nothing, how did we do that? When they where better hunters then us. Have you ever heard of a raptor? Any one of them their are a few types.Look them up and you will see how we would never have survived.Also whit sickness the dinosaurs carried that humans would be able to get. i would like to know why you think they did that is silly.
Anyone who suggests that the ancients saw dino bones and carved these is dumb. If you knew what it took to excavate such gigantic sets of bones all just to arrange them correctly and make life representations that are more accurate than even our own fallacious modern representations then you wouldn't say these things.
@shadowtiger18 That's actually exactly why they depicted them. You seem to think it's not possible over the countless centuries man has existed as well as civilization, for fossilised remains of Dinosaurs to surface at any point in time. Furthermore, it is not necessary to reconstruct the entire creature, much less completely unearth it, for ancient people's to start creating their own depictions based on what is in the ground.
Some of the depictions are of fire breathing and Chinese dragons, but most of them are of the Acambaro Figures that were debunked as a poorly executed hoax decades ago.
What do you expect when you live life with blinders on? I'm sure those pushing this garbage were well aware it's a hoax, but you can claim anything as evidence when your followers lack discernment, skepticism, or just plain common sense.
I don't know. These could be people someone trying to draw what a set of dinosaurs bones might look like. If they found a good set of bones they could have wonder what it looked like and tried to draw it. If the bones were in good shape they could get really close to what they would look like. If humans did walk with dinosaurs ( not saying they did) It would have been a long time ago and stories and drawings were past down. We really need more evidence for early humans.
For one thing, some of these don't look like the dinosaurs you're trying to pass them off as, and others don't like like dinosaurs at all to me. Furthermore, some of them are so specific, I doubt their authenticity. And even if they're all real, there are other possible explanations. What would really be convincing is finding dinosaur bones in an Inca temple or a dino saddle made for riding. I mean if we lived together, evidence should be everywhere.
Many ancient cultures, from China and India to Greece, America, and Australia, tell tales of dragons, monsters, and giant heroes. Then you find these massive stone megalithic buildings all over the ancient world, Many cultures have stories of giants living among us, including the bible so maybe there were giants and they built those huge megolithic buildings. Usually all ledgends and myths have some truth to them. Have you ever seen a kimoto dragon that is a dinosaur.
@mtlwolf35 no doofus. your art is based on the depictions of dinosaurs made by discovering skeletal remains of the beasts. depending on how old those sculptures and wut not are; they COULD be first-hand accounts of interaction with dinosaurs by man. HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS if not MILLIONS of years ago.
@disestablishme how would they make a scelitin and even if its wouldnt look like a diosor it would just be a pile of bones and we just resently found our first real scol
And just for the record, dinosaurs Did and Do live with man! They're called crocodiles and birds now tho...before you idiots go around spouting ignorance like this, try to get better scores in science class! Don't just pick and choose stories that seem like the truth to you, learn the process of figuring out to a high degree of accuracy why those stories are BS and research both sides of the argument before making a decision! Get a clue ppl!
Oh WOW! And to think all this time there was no possible way that man could ever have seen dinosaur remains eroding out of a hillside and infer with great accuracy and detail that these remains were from creatures that loosely resembled animals and reptiles that they knew from their everyday existence! It must have blown their primitive minds to think these creatures could still be lurking in far off places as stories of giant creatures percolated the ancient world! Good thing they were friendly
I'm sorry for you evolutionist's, but in fact Dino's lived with man the proof is right there. Why would you cover a lie if the truth is right in front of you.
It's just as dumb as saying my ancestors where ''apes''.
@Morenob ok so, evolving means getting better and changing and adapting right? if we did evolve from monkeys, we would stilll have tails, and we would have grown gills by now to breathe underwater, and we would have awesome giant wings in our backs, so just agreein with you that we didnt evolve from monkeys
@CreatureOfTheNights1 We are apes, apes don't have tails. We still have some of the bones from the ones our ancestors had. BTW ''monkey' and ''ape'' are classifications. Humans are classified as: Human / ape / monkey / primate / mammal / tetrapod / cordate / animals.
@CreatureOfTheNights1 By your statement, it's clear you have no understanding of how evolution works. You have just made everyone on this page dumber. I award you no points, and may 'god' have mercy on your soul lol.
Your "evidense" doesn't prove anything. Someone could make a video thousands of years from now with our depictions of Pikachu, and essentially say that it proves Pokemon were real.
@gregrutz these artifacts, all over the earth(most of them, too much similar in every details), shows they saw something, and coincidentally looks like dinosaurs. Hmmm I like to hear your explanation.
Yet another load of BS. Imaginary drawings of creatures have been around since the dawn of man. So what! Oh and we know the footprints are fake. So stop rehashing a load of BS.
@superjam18 There is no proof. Fossil evidence. The statues of the "dinosaurs" are actually fakes. They were made like 100 yrs. ago. The Chinese and the English drew dragons.
because it would be completley ridicoulus for an ancient person to find one of the millions of fossils that litter the earth and think" OH shit I bet one of this fuckers are still walking around" and then started telling bullshit stories and drawing crap
What's YOUR scientific evidence for this conclusion?
If these pictures are just sunday school sculptures and hoaxes, what then can we say about our biology books, about evolutionist scientists and TV programme's? Did you never see how scientists just push evolution through our throats by showing only evidence and never showing countr-evidence. From the beginning of our lives we are taught that life began spontaneously without ever thinking about that it could be wrong
@rdezoveelste You were obviously taught that life began by some magic guy's will and the entire human population came to be by the means of thousands of generations of incest, and you never question it.
Evolution is accepted because it's logical and is supported by real, recreate-able evidence.
"Science is simply common sense at its best." ~Thomas Huxley
Hitler said in his book 'mein kampf' that if you should tell a lie in public by propaganda, you should tell a big one, because the bigger the lie, the more people will believe it, because they will believe that nobody could tell such a big lie unless it's the truth. That's the spirit of evolution.
The point is, species do change. Sometimes even new species arise. The limit is: Complicated systems!
It is proven that species do change, limbs can get larger, body forms changed.
But THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC PROVE ON THIS PLANET THAT COMPLICATED SYSTEMS LIKE ORGANS CAN EVOLVE. The problem with complicated systems is that all elements of the system should be present at the same time to make it work. This is impossible with evolution, since every element (part) should evolve in time. You can find more on this topic on the internet
@rdezoveelste If you think about it yourself, it's the same shit. Small changes, all over, only stretched out over millions of years.
Oh and there IS >proof<, a metric shitton of it. With sources. And experiment logs. And photos. On the internet, too.
Why do you even argue if you don't know shit about evolution?
And furthermore, why don't you just brainwash yourselves into believing that big bang and everything that followed was done by your magic man and be done with it?
The best part is that half of the representations of dinosaurs are WRONG. It's how they were believed to look like at least 50 years ago. So basically, there is absolutely no way that these representations are real. The tyrannosaurus would NOT stand up like a human, but would walk like a chicken, with its tail in the air.
It's like finding a representation of a knight in armour being put on a horse with a crane before combat. We would know 100% that it's a hoax.
interesting theory, apart from the total lack of dino fossils more recent than 65 million years old, and the fact there are dozens of mediumsized lizards and reptiles still alive today to account for people picturing them in the past.
Next up : proof that leprechauns and pixies existed, because they were written about before hollywood invented cgi. Even more convincing than this collection of recent fakes and vague old stuff.
Indians believed in flying houses and china believed in dragons so what if early humans saw a tiny lizard and had inaginated it was something scarier.
@AhmedTarek818 Your right, it's not a big deal. It ONLY means that dinosaurs did exist after their "extinction" 65 millions years ago, and scientists were wrong about the the radiometric dates of fossils. Pshhh, I'm still confident in those "Scientists." I mean there right about everything they say even though I have no Idea how they come to their conclusions anyway...........o_O
I remember this form my past lives. Eventually, the dinosaurs testy behavior as wells competition for resources and dinosaur charming pot drove us to battle. I know I had a friend one and accidentally ate most of it's eggs once, then it came home nd we wept and I rolled the last egg to it but then it was killed and eaten.
Both Scienctists and Creationists lie. However Scientists are bios Evolution is a Theory and some Scientist now agreed in intelligent design. I am not sure if that's the right word. But that DNA cannot replicate change without a control method.
@Zorolord I don't have anything in common with you. And you won't prove me wrong. You will think you did, but all you will have said will be common christian, uneducated gibberish.
And lets face it, that would imply that you would actually read and understand what I would have to have said.
@xamanto I know I have nothing comment in with you, I was impling your left your shoe! We both have superior education over you.. I can't explain to a Simian that is already full, I am talking about Darwin Evolution not creation. I am not religious, the only thing I agree with Darwin is survial of the fitness hence your existence. You certainly aren't the smartness person around, however your vain attempt at imitating intelligence is most intriging. I am suprised you are still in the gene pool.
Let`s use common sense here. There were over 50,000 of the found. Think about it. Stop letting the INDOCTRINIZATION of what you are taught in school brainwash you. Open your minds. Acting like this is the only evidence.
@vme1111 "Open your minds" to what? The cage of belief that everything is because of a magical man?
No thanks, I'll stay the "narrow-minded" follower of science and civilization.
P.S. The >Indoctrination< you're speaking of allows you to comment freely on a open message board in the internet, using a computer that is obviously more complex than your brain.
@xamanto Again with ther personal attacks instead of addressing the evidence showing the narrow-mindedness. What else is new. You are living proof of someone who fell for the deception.
@airrocker001 Thats true. Have creationists ever thought that early sculptors and painters simply spotted a lizard one day and, using their creative minds, exaggerated these sculptures of reptiles to make it more artistic?
The title page misspelled evidence, so I don't harbor much hope that the rest of the video will offer much real information. You should expect much from willfully ignorant people except more ignorance.
yawn ever think of the possibility that these came from fairytales and were made to represent the creatures we made in our mind. let's take a small lizard for instance, blow it up and give it huge spikes, larger sized muscles and huge sharp teeth makes it look more ominous and of course it dosen't exist anymore.on another note, draconian concepts have been around for centuries and repeated throughout time
@airrocker001 Do you read the bible or even believe in God. they are introduced in the bible. We lived with them. Where else would the word Dragon come from. Dinosaurs Look like dragons So your wrong there buddy.
@twiztidvinez20 no i dont believe in god and i have read parts of both the new and old testaments,including genisis.Humans can easily sculpt something they imgaine or are inspired from real life whereas fossils have been here from millions of years.I understand you will easily object to this, but my faith is within fossils,etc. I can even go as far as saying that fossils inspired early humans to create these sculptors.By the way, where are these pictures and sculptures from?
@twiztidvinez20 The word "Dragon" came from the same place that fairies, leprechauns, unicorns and goblins came from, our imagination.
A slideshow of random clay sculptures done in Sunday school without radiometric dating, without locations of where these things were "discovered" is as much "proof" as the many pieces of noahs ark. enough pieces of noahs ark have been found to build a fleet of ark's and every piece tested have been shown as a hoax.
@tireironman I suppose he made cave paintings, bronze sculptures and stone reliefs in Sunday school too? And one critical difference is that unicorns, fairies, and the like are all limited to certain areas. However, every single ancient culture has some dragon legend and they are all large, reptilian creatures. Now what could have made a whole species have the same legend aside from actual creatures? We don't even know they are extinct; check out Mokele mbembe, Kasai rex, Ngoubou, and Muhuru.
@Dinoenthusiastguy No. Only a few ancient cultures incorporated dragons into their mythology. The Hittites didn't, the Egyptians didn't (they had a deep respect for crocodiles but no such thing as dragons), the Sumerians, Assyrians, the Celts, the Iberians, the Medes, the Persians, the Lydians, the Olmec, the Axumites, the Koreo, the Yamato, the Mauryans, the Myceneans, the Thracians and the Armenians had no large reptillian creatures in their mythologies.
@AntiochusMegas OK, so dinos might not have lived all over the planet. Still, what an odd coincidence that the Native Americans, Pygmies in Central Africa, and the Chinese (just to name a few) all have myths of giant reptilian creatures. What about the Mokele mbembe, Kongamato and other such creatures? One man once came into a hospital with a deep wound in his chest and drew a rhamphorhynchoid pterosaur when asked to describe the creature.
This is retarded, those sculpted "dinosaurs" couldve been early mans' artistic interptetation of modern reptiles. Man creationists are desperate to try and prove themselves right :/
aside from the fact that these are either fake or misunderstood images of modern creatures how would one line of evidence be 'proof'?... you know that jursic park was just a movie right?
@gregrutz "There was only one ''evolution fraud''..." really??? all i need is to give u 1 more to refute ur claim; since i'm feeling generous, i will give u 2 more: Nebraska man & Archaeoraptor Liaoningensis
"There was lots of false prophats so Jesus was false." wow! u just agreed that Jesus was correct when He said many false prophets will arise.
"NephilimFree and jesusLostaChilder777 You attracted a smat crowd. LOL" u mean smarter than u? my guess is that they pwnd just like i did. go away.
@leviMichealathan -Nebraska man was a mistake not fake.It never did receive acceptance in the scientific community. Which just goes to show that the scientific process works.
@TheEarthFirst "It never did receive acceptance in the scientific community." if u mean it was never accepted by the majority, then ok, but, it was published; for example (Gregory, 1923)
@leviMichealathan Nebraska man wasn't a fraud but a mis classification that was not even published in a peer reviewed journal, Archaeoraptor Liaoningensis was fraud but not published in a peer review journal either, but in Nat Geo
most if not examples aren't frauds from the scientific community but from greedy individuals, they had no intend to push evolution, just to make an easy buck
science can't control what is being published in popular media nor blamed for it
"Nebraska man wasn't a fraud but a mis classification that was not even published in a peer reviewed journal" it was published; for example (Gregory, 1923); if u think a tooth for nebraska man was a mere "mis classification", then...
also, my point was not being peer reviewed or not but frauds; u seem to agree.
"most if not examples aren't frauds from the scientific community but from greedy individuals, they had no intend to push evolution, just to make an easy buck" really?
Haeckel, Ketterwell, Sir Arthur Smith Woodward, Harald Cook, Eugene Dubois, etc, etc were not part of the scientific community? their "descoveries" didn't circulate the scientific community? they were not published? they had no intention to push evolution?
"science can't control what is being published in popular media nor blamed for it" yes, scientists are the ones who control everything and some of them push their fairytales down science's throat.
In the book of JOB, there r verses that depict in great detail the observation of Dinosaurs. The Leviathan (Most powerful Greatest sea creature God has ever created ) is mentioned 6 times in the Hebrew Bible, with Job 41 being dedicated to describing him in detail. There was mention of a guy who discovered the massive skeleton of Leviathan near the area of Mt. Sanai as described in the Bible via google earth! It is weird that Google Earth has part of the massive skeleton cover with clouds!
When God created animals then created Men, he made all animals vegetarians including Dino's... It wasn't until after Noahs world flood that God put fear into animals & Men could now eat meat and every living thing that moveth upon the earth. The flood is what created fossils of these creatures. Noah also saved all kinds of Dino eggs since they were young & live longer & multiply. Is no coincidence that there r so many legends of dragons during medieval times. Warriors kill Dino's as trophies!
@LALOMAN18 I can't tell if you just having a laugh or are indeed extremely uneducated? If you honestly believe that the bible is the literal truth then I simply wonder why you, like so many Americans, are absolutely brainwashed with this religious nonsense? How on earth could you possibly believe the texts of uneducated, bronze age farmers? The bible is absolutely nonsense - look at the middle east today - it's still a mess with all the ridiculous religions competing with each other?
Why don't any of these look like dinosaurs?
gregrutz 2 days ago
This isn't proof anymore than pictures of aliens in modern media are proof of their existence. People are creative and they make up monsters. Hell, some of them could have found fossilized dinosaurs. The fact of the matter is that there is an overwhelming amount of evidence pointing to the fact that humans are relatively new and dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago, and pictures of very dubious "ancient" art proves absolutely nothing.
werebee 6 days ago
@werebee I will say one thing for you, though. I liked the music.
werebee 6 days ago
2:14 ??? wtf yeah right!
2:33
what the hell is that???
ComedianFromNASA 2 weeks ago
all of this stuff is fake! If any of it really WERE real then it would have been on the front page of every newspaper!
multisnootylives1 2 weeks ago
@multisnootylives1 The global media like TV broadcast and newspaper firms are controlled by supporters of evolution (no god) theory so anything that conflict that ideal will not be declared publicly. Neil Armstrong ever hinted that truth has many protective layers in our society so not all truths are shown but guarded from the public to satisfy an agenda.
Lron217 2 weeks ago
@Lron217 If that was true then how come CNN talked about the creation museum?
multisnootylives1 1 week ago
most of these are proven hoaxes and were carved very recently(so were the foot prints in texas) but of course some poeple will grasp at anything and cling to falseities to feel secure that thier mythology is correct and true. it happened is history past and it is happening today.it is very tough tto give up a beliefe system no matter what the evidence.thier minds bend,twist and make up info to protect thier belief
mandrillx 1 month ago
the small rock carving and pottry was shown to be fakes,they were recently carved to sell to tourist.
mandrillx 1 month ago
Wow, most of those are absolutely representations of dinosaurs!
Mattthewinner 1 month ago
Heres my xxxplaination 'terry'. YOUR A DUMBASS FUCK.
spookerr 1 month ago
150 People r Atheists.
To411u 1 month ago
@To411u 153... And we are smart enough to know that these are as fake as a plastic dinosaur.
cdickenson64 4 weeks ago
@cdickenson64 Ya but but the images on those walls & hieroglyphs aren't fake, what do u call legends of Dragons & humans slaying them? This is not just a foklore legend it is true!! Furthermore Dinosaurs still exist today in not fully unexplored parts of the World like the Congo & Amazon! New unidentified species are constantly being discovered! Ancient man called what we call today Dinosaurs, Dragons because the word didn't exist in the English language until the mid 19th Century!
To411u 4 weeks ago
@To411u Proof??? Dinosaurs in the Congo? and the Amazon?? Why haven't we found them with all this encroachment and deforestation?
By the way a living dinosaur is commonly called an alligator or crocodile... And if you believe science, like I do... Birds are decedents of dinosaurs... But that does not mean the big ones walked with humans... A hieroglyphic picture isn't proof enough.
Read the post by mandrilx.
cdickenson64 4 weeks ago
@cdickenson64 Huh what do u mean? Theres alot of places that haven't been deforestated there, don't be deceived by Science, or better yet Satan. You underestimated the size of the Congo Jungle, Its far bigger than most people thing, infact its bigger than several states.. & The Amazon has a river that is 7 miles wide in some parts, & Birds being decendants of Dinosaurs is Nonsense, do you know how different the 2 are? Thats total bull!! & ya actually it is, sorry I won't read it but..
To411u 3 weeks ago
@cdickenson64 Humans where different than you think Thousands of years ago.. Infact humans where bigger around the time of the Dinosaurs.. Did u know that Reptiles never stop growing there entire lives? Because b4 the Pre-Flood world there was a canopy of 50% more oxygen that allowed humans & Dinosaurs to live longer.. How is it that when they find Ancient Dragonflies eggs or other bugs there packed with 50% more oxygen?
To411u 3 weeks ago
@cdickenson64 damn you are so gullible!!! You listen to some preacher tell you he knows more than a scientist/satan(that's another argument for a different day), and you believe him because why would he lie? He's reads from a book that was written 600 to 800 years ago and 200 or more years after the main character died and left no physical evidence of his existence short of some far fetched stories.
cdickenson64 3 weeks ago
@To411u following that logic, we're going to discover aliens soon also too since on mayan art there were also some round objects that some people think looked like U.f.o's but don't tell that to a creationist, he'll say that these are demons and just tricks of the devil. They called them demons and no, it's not folklore.those are in fact ALIENS my little christian friends!
79hfx 1 week ago
Wake up SHEEPLE, Darwin is DEAD.
spookerr 1 month ago
Damn..."Scientists" have successfully brainwashed sheeple to satisfy their 'nerd sexy' ways and attempt to conquer again, more sheeple, that now most sheeple just accept what they say blindly. I suppose if they told you to kill your handicapped offspring, sheeple would. LMFAO
spookerr 1 month ago
@spookerr "I suppose if they told you to kill your handicapped offspring, sheeple would." That was what Abraham was going to do to his healthy son. And he wasn't an atheist. Please explain.
TerrencePhillip66 1 month ago
Wait, this video isn't a joke?
LearBear88 1 month ago
The crockery is pottery made for tourists in Peru and the rest of the pictures are subject to interpretation. Dinosaurs had been extinct for tens of millions of years before humans evolved. People tend to underestimate the intelligence of ancient man. The Greeks and Romans and Chinese actually had museums dedicated to dinosaur bones. They interpreted them in art and did for the most part an astounding job. This video is poppycock.
Cainkane1 1 month ago
I love these videos, these pictures are amazing. I expect nothing less from young earth believers who lead their whole life following a book. If these pictures are proof dinosaurs walked with man than I guess Lizard men are real also, UFO's visited often and bird like men, serpent men and winged dogs existed also. If this is the path you wish to go then by accepting these as proof you can not deny the other pictures we find around the globe depicting strange humanoid figures and events.
lowzook 2 months ago
There are both footprints in limestone in Texas.. to make limestone it takes 2300 deg on calcium carbonate there were no volcano and the vast amount of limestone in that area only points to the astroid and the prints are all moving in the same area. Go to five mile damn south of Kyle Texas and ask any of the locals there they will show you both.. in the limestone.. you can tell they "were," running in mud.
iondetox 2 months ago
Because man wiped them out with hunting. So you are saying that we hunted the dinosaurs to nothing, how did we do that? When they where better hunters then us. Have you ever heard of a raptor? Any one of them their are a few types.Look them up and you will see how we would never have survived.Also whit sickness the dinosaurs carried that humans would be able to get. i would like to know why you think they did that is silly.
buck3012 2 months ago
So whys the dodo bird not running around then. We walked with it. Buck!
81rexkwando 2 months ago
......
81rexkwando 2 months ago
so if we were living with dinos so long ago why do we not have them running around now
buck3012 2 months ago
@buck3012 Because they taste like chicken, and finger lickin' good.
Nomoreidsleft 2 months ago
I lol'd.
Mickwithanumber 2 months ago
Anyone who suggests that the ancients saw dino bones and carved these is dumb. If you knew what it took to excavate such gigantic sets of bones all just to arrange them correctly and make life representations that are more accurate than even our own fallacious modern representations then you wouldn't say these things.
shadowtiger18 3 months ago
@shadowtiger18 That's actually exactly why they depicted them. You seem to think it's not possible over the countless centuries man has existed as well as civilization, for fossilised remains of Dinosaurs to surface at any point in time. Furthermore, it is not necessary to reconstruct the entire creature, much less completely unearth it, for ancient people's to start creating their own depictions based on what is in the ground.
OCPios62 2 months ago
Comment removed
shadowtiger18 3 months ago
Some of the depictions are of fire breathing and Chinese dragons, but most of them are of the Acambaro Figures that were debunked as a poorly executed hoax decades ago.
What do you expect when you live life with blinders on? I'm sure those pushing this garbage were well aware it's a hoax, but you can claim anything as evidence when your followers lack discernment, skepticism, or just plain common sense.
KJRUSS0 3 months ago
@52 sec. Please show me a dinosaur with points on its throat. Come on.
gregrutz 3 months ago
I don't know. These could be people someone trying to draw what a set of dinosaurs bones might look like. If they found a good set of bones they could have wonder what it looked like and tried to draw it. If the bones were in good shape they could get really close to what they would look like. If humans did walk with dinosaurs ( not saying they did) It would have been a long time ago and stories and drawings were past down. We really need more evidence for early humans.
SuperMrAtheist 3 months ago
Meh... I'm not quite convinced.
For one thing, some of these don't look like the dinosaurs you're trying to pass them off as, and others don't like like dinosaurs at all to me. Furthermore, some of them are so specific, I doubt their authenticity. And even if they're all real, there are other possible explanations. What would really be convincing is finding dinosaur bones in an Inca temple or a dino saddle made for riding. I mean if we lived together, evidence should be everywhere.
FrankLightheart 4 months ago
Ancient Protectors... they'll be back...... ;)
Megaloth 4 months ago
Many ancient cultures, from China and India to Greece, America, and Australia, tell tales of dragons, monsters, and giant heroes. Then you find these massive stone megalithic buildings all over the ancient world, Many cultures have stories of giants living among us, including the bible so maybe there were giants and they built those huge megolithic buildings. Usually all ledgends and myths have some truth to them. Have you ever seen a kimoto dragon that is a dinosaur.
Thundralight 5 months ago
All this proves is humans have been here longer than 6000 years. I believe we have been here a minimum of 200,000 years.
poolboy8888 5 months ago
wow ! I can draw a dinosaur . dose that meen they are still alive and just hidding ?
mtlwolf35 5 months ago
@mtlwolf35 no doofus. your art is based on the depictions of dinosaurs made by discovering skeletal remains of the beasts. depending on how old those sculptures and wut not are; they COULD be first-hand accounts of interaction with dinosaurs by man. HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS if not MILLIONS of years ago.
disestablishme 5 months ago
@disestablishme how would they make a scelitin and even if its wouldnt look like a diosor it would just be a pile of bones and we just resently found our first real scol
billgib13579 5 months ago
@billgib13579 um... i uh. i... i didnt eh. what?
disestablishme 5 months ago
These cave people need photoshop
ROFLmyWAFLZ 6 months ago
And just for the record, dinosaurs Did and Do live with man! They're called crocodiles and birds now tho...before you idiots go around spouting ignorance like this, try to get better scores in science class! Don't just pick and choose stories that seem like the truth to you, learn the process of figuring out to a high degree of accuracy why those stories are BS and research both sides of the argument before making a decision! Get a clue ppl!
paleoterra01 6 months ago
Oh WOW! And to think all this time there was no possible way that man could ever have seen dinosaur remains eroding out of a hillside and infer with great accuracy and detail that these remains were from creatures that loosely resembled animals and reptiles that they knew from their everyday existence! It must have blown their primitive minds to think these creatures could still be lurking in far off places as stories of giant creatures percolated the ancient world! Good thing they were friendly
paleoterra01 6 months ago
Now that you have passed bullshit 101 maybe you should go back to spelling class.
TheLblomme 6 months ago
You know these drugs you're taking? Don't take them.
TomFynn 6 months ago
So just because there's some ancient art that looks like a dinosaur, we used to live with them. That's why Zeus and ra are real too right?!
drakomytaka599 6 months ago
oh wait.. you mean this video is serious ?? You actually beleive that dinosaurs lived with man ??
really ?
podoau 6 months ago
I'm sorry for you evolutionist's, but in fact Dino's lived with man the proof is right there. Why would you cover a lie if the truth is right in front of you.
It's just as dumb as saying my ancestors where ''apes''.
Morenob 6 months ago
@Morenob you cant be serious
podoau 6 months ago
@Morenob ok so, evolving means getting better and changing and adapting right? if we did evolve from monkeys, we would stilll have tails, and we would have grown gills by now to breathe underwater, and we would have awesome giant wings in our backs, so just agreein with you that we didnt evolve from monkeys
CreatureOfTheNights1 6 months ago
@CreatureOfTheNights1 We are apes, apes don't have tails. We still have some of the bones from the ones our ancestors had. BTW ''monkey' and ''ape'' are classifications. Humans are classified as: Human / ape / monkey / primate / mammal / tetrapod / cordate / animals.
Are you a plant or an animal?
Have a backbone?
Do you have 4 limbs?
Live birth, give milk?
keep going.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz whatever, D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.
CreatureOfTheNights1 6 months ago
@CreatureOfTheNights1 By your statement, it's clear you have no understanding of how evolution works. You have just made everyone on this page dumber. I award you no points, and may 'god' have mercy on your soul lol.
gotitans999 6 months ago
Your "evidense" doesn't prove anything. Someone could make a video thousands of years from now with our depictions of Pikachu, and essentially say that it proves Pokemon were real.
larihammond 6 months ago
@larihammond
Love this...
lowzook 2 months ago
@lowzook Yes, it is really funny but it says there is proof dinos lived with man. I didn't see any proof.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz these artifacts, all over the earth(most of them, too much similar in every details), shows they saw something, and coincidentally looks like dinosaurs. Hmmm I like to hear your explanation.
DerektheDuctTape 2 months ago
@DerektheDuctTape None of these look like dinosaurs except the fake inca stones.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@DerektheDuctTape The only way we know of dinosaurs is from the fossils of them that are in rocks older than 65 million years old. You figure it our.
gregrutz 1 month ago
Holy crap, I feel dumber just for having watched this stupid video to observe the 'evidence'.
KarmicApexIntellect2 6 months ago
Yet another load of BS. Imaginary drawings of creatures have been around since the dawn of man. So what! Oh and we know the footprints are fake. So stop rehashing a load of BS.
mtbee9 6 months ago
scores a 9.7 on my fail-o-meter
annka1427 6 months ago
0:30 amazing proof
4FunPlayin 6 months ago
some of those look like greek pottery,..so are you sayin the spartans could have rode in on 300 T-rexs' to the battle of thermopolae? lol
"i only present the evidense"
ha ha ha ha classic.
nrgetick 6 months ago
What is this is stupid......Dinosaurs and man never coexisted... There is no proof that they did.
IvanMorales420 6 months ago
@IvanMorales420 so are all these artifacts with the pictures and cave drawings a part of their imaginations?
superjam18 6 months ago
@superjam18 There is no proof. Fossil evidence. The statues of the "dinosaurs" are actually fakes. They were made like 100 yrs. ago. The Chinese and the English drew dragons.
IvanMorales420 6 months ago
@IvanMorales420 oh, shut the fuck up dumb ass.
lordfirewolf14 6 months ago
@lordfirewolf14 Sure. It is not real.
IvanMorales420 6 months ago
karl pilkington Would like to see this!
emzknow 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are the "Likes" on this video from people who had a good laugh, or from religiotards who believe this nonsense?
ndrthrdr1 6 months ago
This is fucking Hilarious, it's the Flinstones.
BigAl4250 6 months ago
@tireironman part 4:
"without locations of where these things were "discovered"" i will just name a few:
wakputi indians (700-1300 ad)
Kachina Bridge native american dinosaur petroglyph utah
carlisle cathedral nothern england 1496
ica, peru 1535 spanish armies reported strange aninals on stones
acombora mexico 4500 years old
chinese artifact 1400
3rd century bc ornamental box china
12th century cambodian temple
leviMichealathan 6 months ago
hey cool ica stones
MrLaSantamuerte 6 months ago
I had a collection of pictures proving that spell checker wheels predate applecarts and war chariots. Unfortunately my dog ate them!
apexwiddy 7 months ago
i always wanted to have pet dinosaure maybe my past self had one :3
xmewhannahx 7 months ago
because it would be completley ridicoulus for an ancient person to find one of the millions of fossils that litter the earth and think" OH shit I bet one of this fuckers are still walking around" and then started telling bullshit stories and drawing crap
Nixom1334 7 months ago
Its amazing how you can craft a creative sculpture of a modern day reptile and these people claim its proof that dinosaurs lived with man
firetools 7 months ago
How would you explain that picture in 1:19
angryzilla 7 months ago
@angryzilla IT'S WHAT A CHILD CAN MAKE FROM CLAY YOU DUMBFUCKING IDIOT AAARGH YOU MAKE ME MAD AS FUCK.
xamanto 7 months ago
@tireironman
What's YOUR scientific evidence for this conclusion?
If these pictures are just sunday school sculptures and hoaxes, what then can we say about our biology books, about evolutionist scientists and TV programme's? Did you never see how scientists just push evolution through our throats by showing only evidence and never showing countr-evidence. From the beginning of our lives we are taught that life began spontaneously without ever thinking about that it could be wrong
rdezoveelste 7 months ago
@rdezoveelste You were obviously taught that life began by some magic guy's will and the entire human population came to be by the means of thousands of generations of incest, and you never question it.
Evolution is accepted because it's logical and is supported by real, recreate-able evidence.
"Science is simply common sense at its best." ~Thomas Huxley
xamanto 7 months ago
@xamanto Look at the bible idiot!
angryzilla 7 months ago
@angryzilla "God" fucking damn you with your ignorant fucking head and the people who brainwashed you.
You fucking SICKEN me.
xamanto 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hitler said in his book 'mein kampf' that if you should tell a lie in public by propaganda, you should tell a big one, because the bigger the lie, the more people will believe it, because they will believe that nobody could tell such a big lie unless it's the truth. That's the spirit of evolution.
The point is, species do change. Sometimes even new species arise. The limit is: Complicated systems!
rdezoveelste 7 months ago
as is said, the limit is: complicated systems!
It is proven that species do change, limbs can get larger, body forms changed.
But THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC PROVE ON THIS PLANET THAT COMPLICATED SYSTEMS LIKE ORGANS CAN EVOLVE. The problem with complicated systems is that all elements of the system should be present at the same time to make it work. This is impossible with evolution, since every element (part) should evolve in time. You can find more on this topic on the internet
rdezoveelste 7 months ago
@rdezoveelste If you think about it yourself, it's the same shit. Small changes, all over, only stretched out over millions of years.
Oh and there IS >proof<, a metric shitton of it. With sources. And experiment logs. And photos. On the internet, too.
Why do you even argue if you don't know shit about evolution?
And furthermore, why don't you just brainwash yourselves into believing that big bang and everything that followed was done by your magic man and be done with it?
xamanto 7 months ago
Most of those have been proven fake or not dinosaurs but other animals.
SuperMrAtheist 7 months ago
those things can be told as MYTHS. i know alot of people have myths about giant lizards
xYellowFangx 7 months ago
The best part is that half of the representations of dinosaurs are WRONG. It's how they were believed to look like at least 50 years ago. So basically, there is absolutely no way that these representations are real. The tyrannosaurus would NOT stand up like a human, but would walk like a chicken, with its tail in the air.
It's like finding a representation of a knight in armour being put on a horse with a crane before combat. We would know 100% that it's a hoax.
ivanlagrossemoule 7 months ago
If pixies aren't real, then how do we have pixie sticks, huh? Huh?
TheOnlyBowl 7 months ago
interesting theory, apart from the total lack of dino fossils more recent than 65 million years old, and the fact there are dozens of mediumsized lizards and reptiles still alive today to account for people picturing them in the past.
Next up : proof that leprechauns and pixies existed, because they were written about before hollywood invented cgi. Even more convincing than this collection of recent fakes and vague old stuff.
gladtobeangry 7 months ago
Y'know, it wasnt that hard for antients to look at a small lizard, have some creativity, and make these "dinosaur" sculptures and paintings :p
firetools 7 months ago
Indians believed in flying houses and china believed in dragons so what if early humans saw a tiny lizard and had inaginated it was something scarier.
ryanb8498 7 months ago
I made the same things in art class
euby54 7 months ago
Dinosaurs lived with man SO WHAT ? O_O
AhmedTarek818 7 months ago
That would be a problem for evolutionists, don't ya think?
rdezoveelste 7 months ago
@AhmedTarek818 Your right, it's not a big deal. It ONLY means that dinosaurs did exist after their "extinction" 65 millions years ago, and scientists were wrong about the the radiometric dates of fossils. Pshhh, I'm still confident in those "Scientists." I mean there right about everything they say even though I have no Idea how they come to their conclusions anyway...........o_O
Diomedsspear 7 months ago
The word dragon' comes from the two legged one..'drag on, man-lizard,drag on...'
SkyeVehr 8 months ago
I remember this form my past lives. Eventually, the dinosaurs testy behavior as wells competition for resources and dinosaur charming pot drove us to battle. I know I had a friend one and accidentally ate most of it's eggs once, then it came home nd we wept and I rolled the last egg to it but then it was killed and eaten.
SkyeVehr 8 months ago
Both Scienctists and Creationists lie. However Scientists are bios Evolution is a Theory and some Scientist now agreed in intelligent design. I am not sure if that's the right word. But that DNA cannot replicate change without a control method.
Zorolord 8 months ago
@Zorolord you are as educated as my left shoe.
xamanto 7 months ago
@xamanto well Simian you have something in common with me. Please explain evolution to me, I can prove you wrong straight away!
Zorolord 7 months ago
@Zorolord I don't have anything in common with you. And you won't prove me wrong. You will think you did, but all you will have said will be common christian, uneducated gibberish.
And lets face it, that would imply that you would actually read and understand what I would have to have said.
xamanto 7 months ago
@xamanto I know I have nothing comment in with you, I was impling your left your shoe! We both have superior education over you.. I can't explain to a Simian that is already full, I am talking about Darwin Evolution not creation. I am not religious, the only thing I agree with Darwin is survial of the fitness hence your existence. You certainly aren't the smartness person around, however your vain attempt at imitating intelligence is most intriging. I am suprised you are still in the gene pool.
Zorolord 7 months ago
I'll be damned if you didn't just disprove evolution!
But... why are there no sculptures of man made by dinosaurs?
I get it! Man was invisible to dinosaurs!
InsertDeepLyrics 8 months ago
@InsertDeepLyrics
Cause most didn't have arms, and the ones that did like T-rex had little arms that couldn't reach the stone to draw!
ViCe1986 7 months ago
y're stupid. Proof by image doesn't exist, you know photoshop ?
mohamedeljab 8 months ago
Let`s use common sense here. There were over 50,000 of the found. Think about it. Stop letting the INDOCTRINIZATION of what you are taught in school brainwash you. Open your minds. Acting like this is the only evidence.
vme1111 8 months ago
@vme1111 "Open your minds" to what? The cage of belief that everything is because of a magical man?
No thanks, I'll stay the "narrow-minded" follower of science and civilization.
P.S. The >Indoctrination< you're speaking of allows you to comment freely on a open message board in the internet, using a computer that is obviously more complex than your brain.
xamanto 7 months ago
@xamanto Again with ther personal attacks instead of addressing the evidence showing the narrow-mindedness. What else is new. You are living proof of someone who fell for the deception.
vme1111 7 months ago
@airrocker001 Thats true. Have creationists ever thought that early sculptors and painters simply spotted a lizard one day and, using their creative minds, exaggerated these sculptures of reptiles to make it more artistic?
firetools 9 months ago
The title page misspelled evidence, so I don't harbor much hope that the rest of the video will offer much real information. You should expect much from willfully ignorant people except more ignorance.
sailcat9 9 months ago
yawn ever think of the possibility that these came from fairytales and were made to represent the creatures we made in our mind. let's take a small lizard for instance, blow it up and give it huge spikes, larger sized muscles and huge sharp teeth makes it look more ominous and of course it dosen't exist anymore.on another note, draconian concepts have been around for centuries and repeated throughout time
airrocker001 9 months ago
@airrocker001 Do you read the bible or even believe in God. they are introduced in the bible. We lived with them. Where else would the word Dragon come from. Dinosaurs Look like dragons So your wrong there buddy.
twiztidvinez20 9 months ago
Comment removed
airrocker001 9 months ago
@twiztidvinez20 no i dont believe in god and i have read parts of both the new and old testaments,including genisis.Humans can easily sculpt something they imgaine or are inspired from real life whereas fossils have been here from millions of years.I understand you will easily object to this, but my faith is within fossils,etc. I can even go as far as saying that fossils inspired early humans to create these sculptors.By the way, where are these pictures and sculptures from?
airrocker001 9 months ago
@twiztidvinez20 The word "Dragon" came from the same place that fairies, leprechauns, unicorns and goblins came from, our imagination.
A slideshow of random clay sculptures done in Sunday school without radiometric dating, without locations of where these things were "discovered" is as much "proof" as the many pieces of noahs ark. enough pieces of noahs ark have been found to build a fleet of ark's and every piece tested have been shown as a hoax.
Just get over the fact that the Earth is old.
tireironman 8 months ago 2
@tireironman
Yes, approximately 13,0000 to 6,000 years old depending on interpretation of the scripture. 13,000 to 6,000 years is a very long time!
ViCe1986 7 months ago
@ViCe1986 4.5 billion years old according to reason and evidence, but you can keep your fairy tales.
tireironman 7 months ago
@tireironman I suppose he made cave paintings, bronze sculptures and stone reliefs in Sunday school too? And one critical difference is that unicorns, fairies, and the like are all limited to certain areas. However, every single ancient culture has some dragon legend and they are all large, reptilian creatures. Now what could have made a whole species have the same legend aside from actual creatures? We don't even know they are extinct; check out Mokele mbembe, Kasai rex, Ngoubou, and Muhuru.
Dinoenthusiastguy 7 months ago
@Dinoenthusiastguy No. Only a few ancient cultures incorporated dragons into their mythology. The Hittites didn't, the Egyptians didn't (they had a deep respect for crocodiles but no such thing as dragons), the Sumerians, Assyrians, the Celts, the Iberians, the Medes, the Persians, the Lydians, the Olmec, the Axumites, the Koreo, the Yamato, the Mauryans, the Myceneans, the Thracians and the Armenians had no large reptillian creatures in their mythologies.
AntiochusMegas 7 months ago
@AntiochusMegas OK, so dinos might not have lived all over the planet. Still, what an odd coincidence that the Native Americans, Pygmies in Central Africa, and the Chinese (just to name a few) all have myths of giant reptilian creatures. What about the Mokele mbembe, Kongamato and other such creatures? One man once came into a hospital with a deep wound in his chest and drew a rhamphorhynchoid pterosaur when asked to describe the creature.
Dinoenthusiastguy 7 months ago
@tireironman part 1:
fairies and goblims were a distortion of demons and angels, which is a basic belief in the supernatural
leprechauns were a type of fairy.
unicorn refers to rhino; but has become distorted recently
even if ur claims are true that these things came from our imagination, it doesn't follow that dragons also came from our imagination.
"A slideshow of random clay sculptures done in Sunday school" plz provide evidence for ur claim.
cont...
leviMichealathan 6 months ago
@tireironman part 2:
the basic concept of dragons come from our imagination???
1946 dictionary definition of dragon: 1. now rare. A huge serpent
historia animalium claims that dragons dragons were not extinct in the 1500s but the animals were extremely rare and realtive small by then
In 1572, a scientist named Ulysses Aldrovandus carefully described a small dragon seen by a farm owner in Northern Italy
herodotus and aristotle saw small flying serpents
cont...
leviMichealathan 6 months ago
@tireironman part 3:
the emperor of china had a royal dragon feeder, and dragons that pulled his chariot
pliny natural history "africa produces elephants but it is india that produces the largest, as well as the dragon"
de natura animalium mentions dragoms
marco polo described a t-rex type dragon
alexander the great's men saw dragons in india
cont...
leviMichealathan 6 months ago
Comment removed
leviMichealathan 6 months ago
@twiztidvinez20 from Greek drakōn 'serpent
Toudiyama 6 months ago
wow you atheists would rather pick theory over proof.
12345soccerguy 9 months ago
most of these are sculpters by various artice of modern times not ancient jes you dont know the dif.
do501 9 months ago
actuly dinosaurs dont walk like that in the vid they have there spines not upright like us duh, so i give this a thumbs down dumb f***
do501 9 months ago
actuly dinosaurs dont walk like that in the vid they have there spines not upright like us duh, so i give this a thumbs down dumb f**
do501 9 months ago
This is retarded, those sculpted "dinosaurs" couldve been early mans' artistic interptetation of modern reptiles. Man creationists are desperate to try and prove themselves right :/
firetools 9 months ago
aside from the fact that these are either fake or misunderstood images of modern creatures how would one line of evidence be 'proof'?... you know that jursic park was just a movie right?
chevroncode 9 months ago
@gregrutz "There was only one ''evolution fraud''..." really??? all i need is to give u 1 more to refute ur claim; since i'm feeling generous, i will give u 2 more: Nebraska man & Archaeoraptor Liaoningensis
"There was lots of false prophats so Jesus was false." wow! u just agreed that Jesus was correct when He said many false prophets will arise.
"NephilimFree and jesusLostaChilder777 You attracted a smat crowd. LOL" u mean smarter than u? my guess is that they pwnd just like i did. go away.
leviMichealathan 9 months ago
@leviMichealathan -Nebraska man was a mistake not fake.It never did receive acceptance in the scientific community. Which just goes to show that the scientific process works.
TheEarthFirst 9 months ago
@TheEarthFirst "It never did receive acceptance in the scientific community." if u mean it was never accepted by the majority, then ok, but, it was published; for example (Gregory, 1923)
leviMichealathan 9 months ago
@leviMichealathan - Yes I agree it was published and never should have been.
TheEarthFirst 9 months ago
@leviMichealathan Nebraska man wasn't a fraud but a mis classification that was not even published in a peer reviewed journal, Archaeoraptor Liaoningensis was fraud but not published in a peer review journal either, but in Nat Geo
most if not examples aren't frauds from the scientific community but from greedy individuals, they had no intend to push evolution, just to make an easy buck
science can't control what is being published in popular media nor blamed for it
Toudiyama 6 months ago
@Toudiyama part 1:
"Nebraska man wasn't a fraud but a mis classification that was not even published in a peer reviewed journal" it was published; for example (Gregory, 1923); if u think a tooth for nebraska man was a mere "mis classification", then...
also, my point was not being peer reviewed or not but frauds; u seem to agree.
cont...
leviMichealathan 6 months ago
@Toudiyama part 2:
"most if not examples aren't frauds from the scientific community but from greedy individuals, they had no intend to push evolution, just to make an easy buck" really?
Haeckel, Ketterwell, Sir Arthur Smith Woodward, Harald Cook, Eugene Dubois, etc, etc were not part of the scientific community? their "descoveries" didn't circulate the scientific community? they were not published? they had no intention to push evolution?
cont...
leviMichealathan 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Toudiyama part 3:
"science can't control what is being published in popular media nor blamed for it" yes, scientists are the ones who control everything and some of them push their fairytales down science's throat.
leviMichealathan 6 months ago
@DishrackDarwin
do you believe dinosaurs lived at the same time with man?
failure to answer with a YES or a NO, will lead me to believe that you do
MrMegatruth 9 months ago
OH COME ON! those dinosaurs at 1:14 are obviously doing the 69, proof that can learn a lot from dinosaurs.
OwlUnitRed 10 months ago
Wow, that is strong "evidense"...
ascetic43 10 months ago
i like how a 0:23 you can go into your back yard pick up a stone get another stone and do that
Bbrosvideos 10 months ago
This is shit. You realize these ancient people could have easily sculpted these models after modern day reptiles right?
firetools 10 months ago
the earth is flat with 4 corners and supported by pillars. sources? the bible.
ZZzzzzzWhat 10 months ago
@ZZzzzzzWhat
Where does it say that?
I'm not bashing on you, just curious.
skateforzero357 9 months ago
@skateforzero357
4 corners (Revelation 7:1, Revelation 7:1), with edges and foudations/pillars (Job 38:4, Job 38:13, Job 9:6, Job 38:4, Psalm 104:5).
ZZzzzzzWhat 9 months ago
even as a lil girl, i wonder about this, this is proof, dna massing with
MrSharon5 10 months ago
Fake
TNtMblog 10 months ago
because nobody else could have ever in the history of forever ever ever ever have dug up the fossils of dinosaurs
certainly not advanced ancient civilizations
Ralokone 10 months ago
It's funny how Christians can give Christians a bad name.
uberu75 10 months ago
This is extremely interesting stuff! Whatever anyone says, good evidence, good video!
TurokSwe 11 months ago
when I was little I drew monsters..they must be real! ..help!
acjub 11 months ago
the indians just suck at drawing casuse they smell bad and were trying to draw bears or something
bubbastewart71 11 months ago
looks like 2nd grade artwork
MrMic1146 11 months ago
u guyz r dumbz
gurljesse 11 months ago
In the book of JOB, there r verses that depict in great detail the observation of Dinosaurs. The Leviathan (Most powerful Greatest sea creature God has ever created ) is mentioned 6 times in the Hebrew Bible, with Job 41 being dedicated to describing him in detail. There was mention of a guy who discovered the massive skeleton of Leviathan near the area of Mt. Sanai as described in the Bible via google earth! It is weird that Google Earth has part of the massive skeleton cover with clouds!
LALOMAN18 11 months ago
When God created animals then created Men, he made all animals vegetarians including Dino's... It wasn't until after Noahs world flood that God put fear into animals & Men could now eat meat and every living thing that moveth upon the earth. The flood is what created fossils of these creatures. Noah also saved all kinds of Dino eggs since they were young & live longer & multiply. Is no coincidence that there r so many legends of dragons during medieval times. Warriors kill Dino's as trophies!
LALOMAN18 11 months ago
@LALOMAN18 I can't tell if you just having a laugh or are indeed extremely uneducated? If you honestly believe that the bible is the literal truth then I simply wonder why you, like so many Americans, are absolutely brainwashed with this religious nonsense? How on earth could you possibly believe the texts of uneducated, bronze age farmers? The bible is absolutely nonsense - look at the middle east today - it's still a mess with all the ridiculous religions competing with each other?
masala505 11 months ago