you used -0.7746 for the 1st x but it should be 0.7746 then you did the opposite for the third x thats why the result its ok but its confusing, would you clear that up for me?
@JRodriguez609 It is how one writes out the three quadrature points and the corresponding weights. Even if you shuffle them (of course the quad point has to be aligned with its corresponding weight), the result will not change.
Are there closed form solutions for finding ci and xi based on n (for n-pt Gaussian quadrature)? i.e., without going through the tedious process of solving the Legendre polynomial, etc.?
Are there closed form solutions for finding ci and xi based on n (for n-pt Gaussian quadrature)? i.e., without going through the tedious process of solving the Legendre polynomial, etc.?
just one thing that realllllllly annoys me is that you write x(as in the letter x) and x(multiplication sign) the same way.. i know it's easy to tell the difference most of the time, but some times when the problem is hard your brain just goes into meltdown wondering if it's an x for multiplication or unknown x.. drives me insane
this happened to me when i was following this, just needed to get that off my chest
a very big thank you to you and all who share their knowledge freely via the internet. This is what it is meant for, and you are the people smart enough to make full use of it.
thank you so much for this video, helped me a lot.
one thing to note though, i was confused when you used x as multiplication operator such as f(0.6x0.7746 + 0.7). I thought x was a variable. I was just not used to that style but good video!
About the weights and abcissas, you can do a search for "gauleg.for numerical recipes fortran" in google. The first site that shows up gives you the fortran code to find these numbers.
Dr. AUTAR K KAW, I very much appreciate for posting all these videos. I had problem understanding numerical methods before but now after reviewing all your videos I understand whats going on. I also shared your videos with my other classmates in mechanical engineering and they all are loving your videos. On behalf of all the students in Mechanical Engineering Department at Concordia University I very much appreciate your help in teaching this course. God bless you,
Thankx to you sir, you help me 2nd time in Gauss Quadrature 3 point rule .... U r GR8 :D :*
iqbal009fly 4 weeks ago
I love the sound of his marker on the board
H2oRiz 2 months ago
you sir are a genius!!! thank you sooo much!
kramaster3 2 months ago
Thanks a lot for the great lesson.
I wrote a very simple VBA program based on your explanation.
mono7891 2 months ago
Thanks, seeing the example worked out really helped!
xjsmstr 6 months ago
you used -0.7746 for the 1st x but it should be 0.7746 then you did the opposite for the third x thats why the result its ok but its confusing, would you clear that up for me?
JRodriguez609 7 months ago
@JRodriguez609 It is how one writes out the three quadrature points and the corresponding weights. Even if you shuffle them (of course the quad point has to be aligned with its corresponding weight), the result will not change.
f(a)+f(-a) is same as f(-a)+f(a)
numericalmethodsguy 7 months ago
Thanks a lot big help !
duhdon 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dr. Autar--thanks for this.
Are there closed form solutions for finding ci and xi based on n (for n-pt Gaussian quadrature)? i.e., without going through the tedious process of solving the Legendre polynomial, etc.?
ariadne3s 1 year ago
Dr. Autar--thanks for this.
Are there closed form solutions for finding ci and xi based on n (for n-pt Gaussian quadrature)? i.e., without going through the tedious process of solving the Legendre polynomial, etc.?
ariadne3s 1 year ago
@ariadne3s I do not think so!
numericalmethodsguy 1 year ago
@numericalmethodsguy
I suppose that would be too convenient...
Thanks for such a quick response.
ariadne3s 1 year ago
Hola, soy de México y te agradezco de verdad q hayas explicado este tema con un ejemplo, siempre es mas facil aprender asi, :)
AnnabelLee25 1 year ago
hi, thanks heaps for the videos
just one thing that realllllllly annoys me is that you write x(as in the letter x) and x(multiplication sign) the same way.. i know it's easy to tell the difference most of the time, but some times when the problem is hard your brain just goes into meltdown wondering if it's an x for multiplication or unknown x.. drives me insane
this happened to me when i was following this, just needed to get that off my chest
darko411 1 year ago
Thank you very much for your help.
mumakmaster 1 year ago
thanks for posting math magic!
eliyam27 1 year ago
thnx a lot...all these videos are really helpful
bondsadi 1 year ago
a very big thank you to you and all who share their knowledge freely via the internet. This is what it is meant for, and you are the people smart enough to make full use of it.
bobobano 1 year ago
Thank you for posting videos.. they are really helpful
syasir08 1 year ago
thank you so much for this video, helped me a lot.
one thing to note though, i was confused when you used x as multiplication operator such as f(0.6x0.7746 + 0.7). I thought x was a variable. I was just not used to that style but good video!
movingincircles 2 years ago
Dr. AUTAR K KAW thank you so much for taking the time to explain Gauuss Quadr. God bless you! You are doing a wonderful job.
ME student
ODU, VA
bucuresticarmen 2 years ago
Can u kindly post a triple integral example?
Secondly from where can i get the table of weights and roots of Quadrature rule for upto 12 points?
allblues1001 2 years ago
Sorry, it is out of scope of the course I teach.
About the weights and abcissas, you can do a search for "gauleg.for numerical recipes fortran" in google. The first site that shows up gives you the fortran code to find these numbers.
numericalmethodsguy 2 years ago
Dr. AUTAR K KAW, I very much appreciate for posting all these videos. I had problem understanding numerical methods before but now after reviewing all your videos I understand whats going on. I also shared your videos with my other classmates in mechanical engineering and they all are loving your videos. On behalf of all the students in Mechanical Engineering Department at Concordia University I very much appreciate your help in teaching this course. God bless you,
Sincerely Yours,
Omid o.
pimpingbuss 2 years ago
Hello Omid:
Please continue to spread the word -thank you. We are hoping that these videos of help to all.
Autar
numericalmethodsguy 2 years ago
Great stuff.
The title of this video has a typo mistake.
wesleysin 2 years ago
Thanks. The title typo has been fixed.
numericalmethodsguy 2 years ago
You did a fantastic job at explaining and I now know how to integrate by using Gauss Quadrature. Keep doing what you are doing, its much appreciated.
scholar4life 2 years ago
Thanks for your comments. Keep watching and I learn from your feedback.
numericalmethodsguy 2 years ago
this stuff is cool!!
atypicalcalifornian 2 years ago