@gigahead Antimatter consists of fundamental particles that are as good as equal to their "normal matter" counterparts - only with opposite charge. For example we have a positron, which is just about the same as an electron, but has a positive charge. When an antiparticle and a normal particle meet they both turn into energy, which I suppose is why they´re called antiparticles, since they "destroy" any normal matter that they get in contact with.
@gigahead Negative matter, also called exotic matter, is something quite different. While anti-matter has been made in experiments, we do as far as I know not know of negative matter exists, but it has been hypothesized that it does. Negative matter would have "negative mass", and react in the opposite way from normal matter when being acted upon by a force, if I´ve understood it correctly. But I don´t understand or know much about the concept of negative matter to be honest.
@krap101 antimatter is not "negative matter" antimatter is still matter with inversed charges but it is still matter. Negative matter means if a negative hydrogen meets a positive hydrogen both the particles just vanish , no energy emitted
@GUARDIANOFFOR If you're going to rant about things that you have no knowledge on, at least use proper English so you don't look like any more of an idiot than you already do.
anyone wanna hear my theory on wormholes (assuming it hasn't already been said of course)?
Since wormholes exist outside our space-time continuum, much like black holes, theoretically we could generate a stable quantum singularity between 2 points in space and possibly time.
For those who don't speak science, picture a wormhole as a doorway between 2 points in space, and a black hole as a bottomless pit. A normal quantum singularity is a black hole. If anyone wants to correct me feel free.
@babylon218 That is a theory which is very possible in my opinion, but you would need something special for the wormhole to take u back or forward in time, without that special thing you will only be moved or you will just cease to exist. Its also hard to believe in the possibility of other realities, but the universe as we know it DOES NOT deny it... i believe there is a possibility of an other reality, the humans brain is a powerful thing that might actually reach that point, meaning Deja Vu.
@DaedalusTV Well it could send you back in time if you were far enough away, this is because when you look into the distance you are looking back in time so it would teleport us to that time. Although I do get what your saying.
@MrChallenger111 nope.avi, black holes crush into a dense ball in anything that enters it, it has nothing to do with transporting (note it can capture light though)
@evanWith7 I'd assume that it's just for aesthetics. Here on Earth, we associate flying with wings, so a wingless ship is going to have less appeal than a winged ship - aesthetically speaking. Since space is a vacuum, aerodynamics don't matter, so you can make it as un-aerodynamic as you want, yes, but wings just look better to the standard person.
It's also possible that it also will go in-atmosphere, in which case it would need wings unless it just magically floats while in-atmosphere.
@ColtonOweekly The Patent is for propulsion uses back in 2001. But it was prototyped in 2009, however Mark R Tomion died unexpectedly 2 weeks after a successful test.
So this time that the wormholes have before separating, is light fast enough to get through?
HyperCamTerm 1 month ago
@ gigahead dude I'm watching the same video haha that's crazy!!!
FFRL0NEvvolf 1 month ago
Negative matter, anti matter, what the hells the difference ?
gigahead 1 month ago
@gigahead Antimatter consists of fundamental particles that are as good as equal to their "normal matter" counterparts - only with opposite charge. For example we have a positron, which is just about the same as an electron, but has a positive charge. When an antiparticle and a normal particle meet they both turn into energy, which I suppose is why they´re called antiparticles, since they "destroy" any normal matter that they get in contact with.
ThorBarstad 1 month ago
@gigahead Negative matter, also called exotic matter, is something quite different. While anti-matter has been made in experiments, we do as far as I know not know of negative matter exists, but it has been hypothesized that it does. Negative matter would have "negative mass", and react in the opposite way from normal matter when being acted upon by a force, if I´ve understood it correctly. But I don´t understand or know much about the concept of negative matter to be honest.
ThorBarstad 1 month ago
@GUARDIANOFFOR show me black hole,... ASSHOLE,,,, this is 1.
KLMNOQPiPan 3 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
Tunguska Vanavara? - + - = +. "26()8" in Pi?
KLMNOQPiPan 3 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
So... we have antimattter now... still affected by gravity. Michio -1!
krap101 3 months ago
@krap101 antimatter is not "negative matter" antimatter is still matter with inversed charges but it is still matter. Negative matter means if a negative hydrogen meets a positive hydrogen both the particles just vanish , no energy emitted
Koroistro 3 months ago
@GUARDIANOFFOR If you're going to rant about things that you have no knowledge on, at least use proper English so you don't look like any more of an idiot than you already do.
name887 3 months ago
that is posible?
MrLens07 4 months ago
YinYang? 96, 69, č"lOvE"K = ((1)(9 = 1 = 6?)?).? Who control and move Your atoms? Me or You? Dober dan.
KLMNOQPiPan 4 months ago
O m c2 = c1 = 9 = 1 = 6?
KLMNOQPiPan 4 months ago
anyone wanna hear my theory on wormholes (assuming it hasn't already been said of course)?
Since wormholes exist outside our space-time continuum, much like black holes, theoretically we could generate a stable quantum singularity between 2 points in space and possibly time.
For those who don't speak science, picture a wormhole as a doorway between 2 points in space, and a black hole as a bottomless pit. A normal quantum singularity is a black hole. If anyone wants to correct me feel free.
babylon218 4 months ago
@babylon218 That is a theory which is very possible in my opinion, but you would need something special for the wormhole to take u back or forward in time, without that special thing you will only be moved or you will just cease to exist. Its also hard to believe in the possibility of other realities, but the universe as we know it DOES NOT deny it... i believe there is a possibility of an other reality, the humans brain is a powerful thing that might actually reach that point, meaning Deja Vu.
DaedalusTV 4 months ago
@DaedalusTV Well it could send you back in time if you were far enough away, this is because when you look into the distance you are looking back in time so it would teleport us to that time. Although I do get what your saying.
TheBaldchipmunk 4 months ago
@DaedalusTV My theory = Black holes are very scary and fun to be with, I know them pretty well.
REDTEAM22003 3 months ago
@REDTEAM22003 Ahh, is that why your brain has been sucked out? xD
DaedalusTV 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@babylon218 Correct me if you like.
DaedalusTV 4 months ago
What happens when the irresistible force meets the immovable object?
pogpog28 4 months ago
@pogpog28 That can only happen when you devide by zero.
HellHound60248 4 months ago
warm holes are unable to travel faster than light
MrChallenger111 4 months ago
Who knows what hellish reality may exist on the other side of those things?
kezadrone 5 months ago
wormholes only take u to another time and another place to a planet or universe or another galaxy in ours
mquiroz90 6 months ago
is black hole travel faster than light
MrChallenger111 7 months ago
@MrChallenger111 nope.avi, black holes crush into a dense ball in anything that enters it, it has nothing to do with transporting (note it can capture light though)
stefmor90 7 months ago
why did the spaceship have wings?
evanWith7 11 months ago 2
@evanWith7 I'd assume that it's just for aesthetics. Here on Earth, we associate flying with wings, so a wingless ship is going to have less appeal than a winged ship - aesthetically speaking. Since space is a vacuum, aerodynamics don't matter, so you can make it as un-aerodynamic as you want, yes, but wings just look better to the standard person.
It's also possible that it also will go in-atmosphere, in which case it would need wings unless it just magically floats while in-atmosphere.
ColtonOweekly 11 months ago
@ColtonOweekly Or has ElectroDynamic Field Generatoin Properties. Mark R Tomion, Inventer, Builder of a working Prototype and tested.
arshdeep125 9 months ago
@arshdeep125 wat
ColtonOweekly 9 months ago
@ColtonOweekly The Patent is for propulsion uses back in 2001. But it was prototyped in 2009, however Mark R Tomion died unexpectedly 2 weeks after a successful test.
arshdeep125 9 months ago