Saydann: It looks like you don't know what you're talking about... Peugeot has not always automatic transmission! And there is no Peugeot 607 that makes 0-100 in 4.5 sec.! We have a Peugeot 607 2.0 with manual transmission, it's faster than the 607 in this video, but it doesn't make 0-100 in 4.5 sec. The 3.0 V6 is not doing it either.
Saydann: It looks like you don't know what you're talking about... Peugeot has not always automatic transmission! And there is no Peugeot 607 that makes 0-100 in 4.5 sec.! We have a Peugeot 607 2.0 with manual transmission, it's faster than the 607 in this video, but it doesn't make 0-100 in 4.5 sec. The 3.0 V6 is not doing it either.
Saydann: It looks like you don't know what you're talking about... Peugeot has not always automatic transmission! And there is no Peugeot 607 that makes 0-100 in 4.5 sec.! We have a Peugeot 607 2.0 with manual transmission, it's faster than the 607 in this video, but it doesn't make 0-100 in 4.5 sec. The 3.0 V6 is not doing it either.
you say the car goes to 100 in 4.5 seconds. True???!!!
a mercedes ml 63 amg with 510HP need 4.8!and you say, that your "strong", primitive motorizes peugeot with 109 hp hit this time? never!!! you are a primitive bighead!!!
But we drove this car for test and its very luxury and has a great price. Thanks for the real commentares
small engine on a big car that's the result! plus the driver shifts at 4.500 rpm and expects power, it's a petrol engine and can easily reach 6.000 rpm!!!
1 generacioba??? 2.0 benzin??? nem, nem olyan nincs.esetleg 2.2 dizel vagy benzin!!!
karessz607 1 year ago
i love this car ... it's one of the few things out there with a soul and passion...
but this video makes it look rather pathetic
mazinais31 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Saydann: It looks like you don't know what you're talking about... Peugeot has not always automatic transmission! And there is no Peugeot 607 that makes 0-100 in 4.5 sec.! We have a Peugeot 607 2.0 with manual transmission, it's faster than the 607 in this video, but it doesn't make 0-100 in 4.5 sec. The 3.0 V6 is not doing it either.
mrmrdawk 1 year ago
Saydann: It looks like you don't know what you're talking about... Peugeot has not always automatic transmission! And there is no Peugeot 607 that makes 0-100 in 4.5 sec.! We have a Peugeot 607 2.0 with manual transmission, it's faster than the 607 in this video, but it doesn't make 0-100 in 4.5 sec. The 3.0 V6 is not doing it either.
mrmrdawk 1 year ago
Saydann: It looks like you don't know what you're talking about... Peugeot has not always automatic transmission! And there is no Peugeot 607 that makes 0-100 in 4.5 sec.! We have a Peugeot 607 2.0 with manual transmission, it's faster than the 607 in this video, but it doesn't make 0-100 in 4.5 sec. The 3.0 V6 is not doing it either.
mrmrdawk 1 year ago
@saydann:
you say the car goes to 100 in 4.5 seconds. True???!!!
a mercedes ml 63 amg with 510HP need 4.8!and you say, that your "strong", primitive motorizes peugeot with 109 hp hit this time? never!!! you are a primitive bighead!!!
But we drove this car for test and its very luxury and has a great price. Thanks for the real commentares
TheApplefan123 2 years ago
haha, where have the driver made his driving pass?? Learn not to fake and good
MediainRes 2 years ago
I own this car and whoever made this faked it so hard
peugeot 607 is ALWAYS a automatic so you dont need to shift.,..
And he didnt hit the gas...
my 607 goes from 0 to 100 in 4.5 sec.... So screw the people who talk about crap here...
saydann 2 years ago
LOL
jaguarnal 2 years ago
Bullshit :P my dad had a manual 607 before he got the 607 2.7 HDI wich is automatic
Dj3ndo 2 years ago
small engine on a big car that's the result! plus the driver shifts at 4.500 rpm and expects power, it's a petrol engine and can easily reach 6.000 rpm!!!
tonywyd 2 years ago
its not a slow car but the driver is not able to shift!!! The car is very nice
TheApplefan123 2 years ago
we have this engine in our Peugeot 607, thanks to the engine is not the strongest is the very churlish. 0.6 extra-urban. Sorry for my bad english!
tracklist1991 2 years ago
this is slow motion
ShortyWSH1 2 years ago
because engine 2,0 it has to less power for this car...
stuwek 2 years ago
Comment removed
stuwek 2 years ago
depends on driver 2
manumakula 3 years ago
Comment removed
manumakula 3 years ago
I even fart faster
theannoyingdogpoo 3 years ago
Its not a bad motor, the motor is undersized for this type of car, the 206 GTI ore 206 RC has the same 2.0 liter engine.
RubenPorschefan 3 years ago 2
@RubenPorschefan
karessz607 1 year ago
por que no le pisas a fondo????
Ponle a este un turbo a ver donde queda el 2.7 ese....
No es justo comparar un atmosferico con un turbo.
loc00000 3 years ago
Oh merda ! Very bad motor... The 2.7 is better ;)
halohost 3 years ago