"There is no god" is more like "There is no roof" because such a claim stands on very weak "walls" called "evidence."
Analogy fail.
Critical Thinking should first be used on your "roof" before trying to take down someone else's.
ShadowSaberBaroxio 1 year ago
'there is no god' may not be a solid hard fact, but it's just as credible as 'there is no boogeymonster; they both have the same amount of proof, ha!
sleepywolff 2 years ago
"There is no god" is more like "There is no roof" because such a claim stands on very weak "walls" called "evidence."
Analogy fail.
Critical Thinking should first be used on your "roof" before trying to take down someone else's.
ShadowSaberBaroxio 1 year ago
'there is no god' may not be a solid hard fact, but it's just as credible as 'there is no boogeymonster; they both have the same amount of proof, ha!
sleepywolff 2 years ago