Added: 1 year ago
From: 1908interpersempre
Views: 2,711
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • bha ancora.... calciopoli ormai l'abbiamo pagato e alla fine dentro c'erano anche altri dentro( vedi inter) questo sarà uno dei pochissimi episodi se non unico a favore... ormai non ci fischiano niente... ci annullano goal ( napoli) e poi a krasic non gli fischiano manco se gli entrano con un piede in faccia... è inutile ... ormai vengono aiutate solo inter e milan... tutte le squadre che in questo momento sono minori : juve , napoli, palermo ecc vengono penalizzate

  • poor inter fans. the feel their time is over soon and the big boys are back (milan and juve)

  • @senkal How are they back exactly? By losing to a newly promoted team? By having 1 point in 2 games (should have been 0 point in two games)? Or by sniffing Inter's ass in the current standings? Which parts?

  • Självklart vill han inte göra mål, utan han vill rensa bollen. Vem fan försöker passa hem i ett sådant läge? Att du kan få det till en medveten hemåtpass är lite läskigt. Hur kan man vara så enögd?

  • @1908interpersempre

    Im talking about inters first game this season(Bologna), the 0-0game. It was so obvious that Inter had ordered the 4th referee to go for 6 addional minutes. Like, how often do the referees sign 6 MIN? Kind of insane I must say.

  • @crswdz Maybe because of the collision between Samuel and Di Vaio which resulted a bloody head for Samuel. I couldn't post the link in the comment. If you want I could send the link to you privately to prove that you're wrong.

    Unlike you haters, I have proofs to support the cheating scums that are Juve. All Juve fans have is their mouths.

  • @crswdz 6 minutes in the game against Udinese as well, in which Inter were ahead 2-1. Douche.

  • Corriere dello Sport: "Serious mistakes in Turin."

    Gazzetta dello Sport: "The 2-1 (first) and 3-2 (second) goals for the Bianconeri should have been cancelled as Pepe and Quagliarella were OFFSIDE."

  • 2nd goal: It didn't last long, as Quagliarella made it 3-2 against another of his former clubs. In fairness, most of the credit goes to Pepe, who took on Zauri, nutmegged the defender to hit the base of the near post from eight yards and it was the easiest of tap-ins for Quagliagol. There were suspicions of OFFSIDE in the build-up."

  • 1st goal: "Juve turned the game around completely in chaotic fashion after the break. Krasic's cross found Gastaldello and only an acrobatic Gianluca Curci save prevented an own goal. Quagliarella's follow-up hit his teammate, but eventually Simone Pepe managed to bundle it over the line from a yard. However, replays suggest Pepe may well have been OFFSIDE."

  • Bullshit, stop hunting juve, look at inter instead.

    Go United!

  • @senkal I would stop hunting Juve when they win fair and square. Until then...

  • @1908interpersempre

    What about inter's 6 minutes additional time in the first match of the season? Luckily inter aint that good that they can score beyond 90th minute:pPpPPPPPPPppp crappy team.

  • Comment removed

  • @senkal Haha. You're a wanker. Just like Juve.

  • little bit exaggerating??

    feels lame to blow ofside for the first goal, because the situation is so lame n weird. very hard to notice that little touch so it get's offside too.

    and what the hell is the point with the other goal????

    do u know what offside is???

  • @dets2 Of course I know what an offside is.

    On the first goal, when Quagliarella takes the shot, Pepe was in front of the ball. And when Pepe and Quagliarella were both behind a Sampdoria last defender, that is an offside goal.

    The second, Quagliarella was a foot off side at the moment Pepe takes that shot.

    Now do you know what offside is?

  • On the first goal, it should be a freekick in the penalty zone , on the line, due to a pass back to the keeper. Look at inter's match and see Udinese's clearly denied penalty.

  • @twizzaq Get real. Cordoba slipped and an Udinese ran right into him. Want to talk about the two penalties that were denied by the ref against Inter? Inter should have had 2 penalties. One is when Zapata fouled Eto'o from behind. There were contacts from on Eto'o's leg and back. And the 2nd one is the handball by Angelli. Cheating scums Juve.

  • @1908interpersempre Haha, are you serious? Etoo, what a dive he did. You did get a penalty for the only handball in the game. Please stop cheating, stupid inter whores.

  • @twizzaq Well, obviously you didn't see the game and that is the point of argue with a delusional fan. Juve should have had two loses and at the bottom of the table.

    It's funny how Juve continue to cheat now and they still suck.

  • @twizzaq Ditt korkade fanskap. Indirekt frispark blåses om bakåtpassen är medveten.

  • @w7geek Han vill ju passa målvakten. Han ville inte göra mål i alla fall. Dvs. hemåtpass.

  • This is bullshit!

  • @Donzozo Yes, the ways Juve used to get a draw in this game is bullshit.

  • merda juve

  • E L'INTER HA RUBATO CONTRO L'UDINESE COME SEMPREEEEE PAGLIACCIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII­II STRONZO MERDEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!

  • LADRI LADRI LADRI LADRI

  • ma cosa volete, per la juventus rubare fa parte del loro DNA... Forza Inter

  • Forza Inter

  • 2 gol di fuorigioco.. e non vincono... stronzi

  • Io mi coccolo la prestazione della mia Samp che è stata veramente fantastica. Peccato per gli errori arbitrali, credo che si poteva evitare quello relativo al gol di quagliarella, obiettivamente si vedeva il fuorigioco

  • @pesk82 Mi sento male per Sampdorida. Essi devono avere ottenuto i tre punti. Il risultato finale avrebbe dovuto essere 3-1 per la Samp. Juve sono ladri.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more