Added: 3 years ago
From: hasportbrian
Views: 651,326
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (893)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • was the mounting difficult ?

  • @konholio2 No, Hasport makes a kit to mount it. The parts are no more difficult to get than a K-series engine.

  • J35a4

  • What series is this engine?

    Dad is a general contractor and went to a fire today and found a perfect V6 in the back. Might snag if for a few hundread!

  • @CEOofTurn10 a man thats a badass set up i am doing the same swap but iam having problem with the flywheeel which one i shut USE if you can welp me i realy presiate I have the 2008 Tl J35A8 Tape S Engine with 2007 Tl standar trany if you can welp me.Thanks

  • it's a cool swap but not very practical that's why people choose a kswap over jswap because with a kmotor it more of a balance ride were the jmotor its going to be front heavy and understeer like a mother

  • @mugentech87 We've built a V6 powered CRX for road racing and are building another V6 powered Integra as well. The understeer is manageable.

  • A LOT OF MONEY BUT POOR HORSE POWER. DO THE SAME WITH A B SERIES ENGINE.

  • @oams2009 Not really. An NA B-series with that much HP doesn't have near the torque and would be a lot less streetable with a narrow powerband and very high revving. Plus the V6 has a 6 speed transmission like the K-series. The price for this swap is less than a K-series. Engine mods would yield 300 horsepower and still be able to run on pump gas. To get similar power you would need to turbocharge a B-series.

  • poor car

  • @HasportBrian - There is a fellow in my town who has done this swap also. Pretty cool how it works sometimes.

  • Look at all the cool novels below me. -__-

  • 255hp and 224lbs of torque to the wheels... This would eat a G35... specially since it weighs less than a G too...

  • このエンジンじゃボンネット閉まんないじゃない?

    まあ、特注するんだろうけど・・・

  • @yakuo1970 The hood will not close we had to cut a hole in it.

  • not only that but the k swap is like 3 times the cost of a j swap

  • may be a stupid question but do you have air con in that thing? id like to cruise in that looking and feeling cool :D

  • @bpeterdude316 It can be done without much problem. We didn't do it on this car. It would require a few custom lines, but there is room.

  • or u could just go k series 4 banger stock with just as much power

  • @l091805772 Uh no, it isn't. 200 vs 245? Not the same.

  • @hasportbrian im sure some of the newer 4 cylinder k24s' have that much power

  • @l091805772 Nope, they're all less than 210.

  • @hasportbrian bro most k20s are over 210 u idiot.

  • @l091805772 they make 201 at the flywheel. that's on honda's website moron. good job.

  • @Thatneonguy Bro, read the specs on Honda's various web sites, almost all K-24s range from 160 to 205. There are two JDM type R K20s, not K24s, with 220 HP. There's also the turbocharged K23 in the RDX, which is 240, but not used in any swaps.

    If you're getting you information from the Wikipedia page, it includes HP figures from special Mugen motors hand built in very small quantities for racing and sold for tens of thousands of dollars. Anyway that's hardly most K20s.

  • @hasportbrian I'm assuming you meant to post that responding to the other kid lol. I'm in complete agreement with you.

  • @Thatneonguy Yup, sorry.

  • @l091805772 Bro, read the specs on Honda's various web sites, almost all K-24s range from 160 to 205. There are two JDM type R K20s, not K24s, with 220 HP. There's also the turbocharged K23 in the RDX, which is 240, but not used in any swaps.

    If you're getting you information from the Wikipedia page, it includes HP figures from special Mugen motors hand built in very small quantities for racing and sold for tens of thousands of dollars. Anyway that's hardly most K20s.

  • G35's are fn trash

  • @onehandsomebugga are you fuckin retarded? get a real car and then come talk to me

  • J32!!!

    

  • my g35 would smash this

    

  • @TheRznballa "your g35" weights 1,000 pounds more take that into consideration

  • @BiGfAtCaN and it has a real engine. yuuuuuuuuuuup

  • @TheRznballa putting out 40 more hp an weighs almost 4000lbs? hp/weight you lose

  • @TheRznballa G35s are fucking slow. This would absolutely destroy it. Did you see the weight? It's making way more in power to weight than some junk ass G.

  • @Thatneonguy slow? hahaha alright then. you do realize youre talking about a honda right?

  • @TheRznballa Oh i'm not trying to praies the honda by any means. but G's are fucking slow and that's a widely known fact. And this swapped civic would rape it. It weighs half the G and makes about 30 hp less at the wheels. that means it's not even a race. the honda is sailing away with no problems.

  • @Thatneonguy slow? its faster than most cars on the road. and youre talking about a swapped civic racing a stock g35. put the same amount of time and money as they put into the civic and then who wins?

  • @TheRznballa LMFAO most cars on the road? stock economy cars pull on G's constantly. I don't know what your aim is here but you should stop hyping up a slow car. I agree that the civic needs money invested into it. But k20 civics are neck and neck with Gs right off the factory line. Matter of fact my car pulls 350zs and Gs bone stock all day long and it's a piece of shit neon. Most cars on the road? you're dreaming son.

  • @Thatneonguy show me a neon that can keep up and ill stop talking. 

  • @TheRznballa you don't have any videos of "your G35." so that should have stopped you from talking. Look up the neon srt-4. It's pulling G35's allllll daaaaayyyyy looooooonnnngggg. It doesn't need to 'keep up' the G35 does.

  • @TheRznballa /watch?v=1iivmOfGvQc

    Stock vs stock. And the neon has an OK driver. Pro drivers have seen 13.8s 100% stock

    G35s are cool cars no doubt, but the drivers are total tools. They aren't fast nor do they get fast without serious modding. Bolt ons for 350s and G35s pretty much just make noise...

  • @TheRznballa I'll give you props though. You said show you a neon that can keep up with a z and you'll stop talking. I showed, you stopped. Man of your word. G35s are still badass cars though!

  • @Thatneonguy well yeah the srt 4 is a badass car. its on its own level. but then again you could watch this

    /watch?v=K3DgP1k4kIw i guess it could go either way then. no doubt the srt 4 is a serious car though. i meant a piece of shit neon when i called it out haha

  • @TheRznballa eh I wouldn't call it a badass car. It's still a neon but with a great engine and tranny. but the point is still there, it's an economy car beating a 'sports car.' G's are nice cars with lots of goodies, but they're heavy as pigs and the v6 is lacking. sounds, looks, and feels great, but not by any means a "fast" car. or beating most cars on the road. My buddy has a v6 accord with the exact same engine here with 6spd and he hangs with me no prob. that engine in a hatch is killing Gs

  • now turbo it

  • @BrianAtHasport I was being really generous when I said they run similar times. On average the ZR1 is faster, not just in a straight line but also on a track, but I've found that when you come right out and say it that you often get a flood of GTR fanboys patrolling for any chance at all to slam the vette and hype up the GTR. Because that wasn't the point I was trying to avoid it by saying they run similar times.

    My comment has never been about what's faster. Just what I think is more fun.

  • There is NO such thing as a 2005 or a 2006 type-s. The type-s returned in 2007.

  • Shit sounds MEAN!

  • need help doning a j30 on a ek 4dr dont know what i need all i got is wire harness ecu half shaft engine

  • @BrianAtHasport I'm not really sure what you meant by "draconian rules." Nobody is forcing production cars to be rwd or awd. If you meant in racing then okay but I wasn't talking about race cars. I mentioned the Nissan GTR and the Corvette ZR1 and how they run similar times on most course but the vette is more fun because it's rwd. Even if awd gets you around the course a little faster it's not worth it to me because it kills the car's fun factor. awd just isn't that big of an advantage.

  • @177SCmaro I meant they forced them to run a very thin tire compared to the other RWD GT cars in order to slow them down. Early in the season when they ran a tire sized the same as the RWD cars they were running away from them.

  • @hasportbrian um...your youtube name changed...?

    Soooooo what does that have to do with anything I've said? I'll say it again in case I wasn't clear the first time.

    Even if awd gets you around the course a little faster it's not worth it to me (meaning, me personally) because it kills the car's fun factor (for ME, personally). awd just isn't that big of an advantage (to ME, personally).

    Is that in any way still unclear? Because I feel like we're having two different discussions.

  • @177SCmaro The brianathasport is another account I use for private videos. hasportbrian is for public videos and it usually what I am logged in as. I don't mean to frustrate or insult you, but you were stating your views and I was stating mine.

  • @hasportbrian Okay then.

    I don't have a problem with your views. But you kind of went off on tangent with that comment beginning with the "draconian rules" thing in racing applications and my comment that you first replied to was about street cars only. Maybe I wasn't clear enough but I just don't think awd is all that great for a street car, especially a sports car, and rwd is more fun. That's all I meant.

  • @BrianAtHasport I've yet to see awd pay off in a really substantial way on the blacktop. Usually it just seems to adds weight, over complicates the drive train, and takes away some of the fun factor. I think there's a reason most supercars are rwd, not awd.

    Compare a awd GTR to a rwd ZR1. They can both pretty much do the same thing in a course, run similar times and all that, but the corvette is a hell of a lot more fun both to watch and to drive. I guess that's all I'm really saying.

  • @BrianAtHasport You mean still keeping the V6 and making it awd? Yeah, maybe, except awd adds alot of weight. Besides, rwd is more fun I think. Unless you plan on sliding around in the mud or something. I think putting something in there like an all aluminum 5.3L V8, like an LS motor, in one with rwd would make it more of a sports car (kinda a Shelby Cobra vib?) than keeping the V6 with fwd or awd. Probably perform better as a sports car at least? Be fast as hell.

    Just my opinion.

  • lol bout time the import crowd discover what a little torque can do.

    Joking aside this is cool but I like the V8 CRX swap and rwd conversion better. More involved but worth it. And the V8 is low enough and set back enough you can still get the stock hood on and weight distribution isn't upset too much. So aside from the rumble and the fact that it's the rear wheels that are spinning, it still looks stock on the outside.

    Anyways, great job on shoehorning the V6 in there.

  • 3.5 is the magick number

    

  • @SuperQuickStick This was a Pilot engine.

  • @hasportbrian im just wondering would it be possible to do the same engine swap into a 1993 integra ls and how much in total would it cost to do the engine swap

  • @hasportbrian i got a question. im doing a j35a4 from the odyssey and i was wondering in the egj1 mounts will work with it and im using the accord 6 speed?

  • by the time you have spent days working out how to get a v6 in to a civic why dident you just get the 2.0 type r engine and just put a masive turbo on it ?

  • @johnspeedfight2 It takes he same amount of effort to install a V6 as a K. It took me less time to design the J-series installation kit than it did to design the first K-series installation kit.

  • Comment removed

  • Sweet stuff man

  • Would this be better than a K series motor for my 93 Civic Ex Coupe!!

  • @PEREZCHOOCH There are some drawbacks to this swap. The fact that it sticks out out of the hood is a big drawback for some. The kit we make to get the engine below the hood creates ground clearance problems. The pluses are interesting; there is a giant WOW factor, the v6 is a real head turner. It also helps that the car is really fast. Significantly than if it simply had a K and almost as fast as my supercharged K.

  • @hasportbrian Well I'm sold I gotta have one but do you know if they make a hood that can cover the engine

  • @PEREZCHOOCH Go to K20A(dot)org and J32A(dot)com and peruse the forums. I heard someone is doing one, but I don't have the info.

  • @hasportbrian Thanks bro!!

  • burn out is going to rip the chassis in half

  • its not a civic any more :(

  • @bomber88x lmao dude rpm has nothing to do with which car is faster did u see the torque numbers your idiot lmao obviously a new guy

  • @bomber88x your stupid. the j series had way more tq than any k, b, and h series. Thats why it has lower RPMs. and yes the j32 will spank on a stock mustang.

  • @bomber88x It would kill a K or B. I know, the J-series is compares favorably to the supercharged K24 in my CRX.

  • an ls1 is smaller than that and has much much much more power

  • @onquarter Smaller? The LS1 is wider and longer. It may be taller too.

  • @hasportbrian *false

    look it up

  • @onquarter Just looked it up, and it turns out I'm only partially wrong. I keep forgetting that the archaic under head cam design makes the engine a lot shorter than the Honda engines. The critical dimension, the length is the problem. It's too long to fit in between the frame rails. 4 cylinders a side versus 3 cylinders a side, tough to make that short.

  • @hasportbrian i could only find one ls1 civic swap and yes, they put it in longituinally (look up civette, its sick) also archaic? ohv is like 10 years older than ohc.

  • @onquarter A RWD conversion for Civics requires either a lot of money or fabrication skills beyond the reach of most of the people doing Honda engine swaps and makes it a poor choice. The V6 swap is less expensive than a K-series swap with a lot more torque and more horsepower. You're right, I should have said less efficient.

  • hmmmm something new to the honda vocabulary: torque

  • it is serious power but dont think you have to go to the extent of putting a massive 3.5 v6 motor into it to get said power..

  • @reilly972008 But it is another option.

  • @hasportbrian but lets face it, its too big for the car! can the 'hood' be closed?

  • @reilly972008 We make two kits, one of them allows you to close the hood. I have a blog post about it at brianathasport.blogspot(dot)co­m. It's about halfway down the page. It's titled "V6 stealth mode engaged".

  • @reilly972008 Of course not, we could have turboed the stock D-series. It wouldn't have lasted very long though.

  • you could asily get that power 255 from the original vtec on that car thats just pointless, cubic inche does not mean more power oly more expense

  • @hondatrx250cc 255 HP from a B16 would cost as much as a V6 swap and the torque would not be hear as great.

  • @hasportbrian Thank you! torque is your friend.

  • @hasportbrian but B16 is lighter. I think that this is not the max power from that V6. :)

  • @OBcIO911 If you had a B16 with 255 and a V6 with 255, the V6 car would be faster despite the weight advantage, The narrow torque curve of the B16 would work against it. And you're right, a little modification on the V6 would yield 300hp easily.

  • its not how fast it is for these guys its the satisfaction that they get doing something that not too many people have on the streets, who cares if its a civic or a 5.0 sc mustang, or a fucking 900 hp truck, its the fun you have from it.

  • like how the guy says, its weird what the torque does after 4500 rpm. Earth to Matilda its cracking Vtec mmkay :)

  • wtf.......it still  sounds like a 4cyl civic.

  • hub dyno ftw.

    and holy shit what kind of exhaust is that? it sounds fucking nasty!!

  • Comment removed

  • now close the hood :p

  • ud be better with the 250bhp S2000 engine lol

  • @DES0LATI0N No, the torque from the V6 makes it much quicker than an S2000 engine would be.

  • trolley honda civic dude@!!!!! AWTHUMMM!!!

  • its funny how they just say "header" even though its a V6 now and it has 2 headers, probably used to the 4 cyl

  • that amount of torque in ff must be awesome

  • the engine is heavy, but the car is light!

  • is this a j35? looks like my bros engine bay for his accord v6

  • @AnTHoNyB1125 yes

  • @MamaMathews3719 arent the headers welded on the block?

  • @AnTHoNyB1125 Yes

  • @AnTHoNyB1125 WOW. ALL THAT FOR 255 fucking horsepower?? fucking ricers

  • @zr1forever im guessing whp........

  • Im willing to guess that car now handles like shit, still a cool swap I guess. Propsssss

  • @REDROTA94 No, it handles OK. I'm building a J-series CRX now.

  • power to weight on this thing must be insane!

  • Can't you do this swap with the stock engine mounts?

  • @DudeNiceVCR No, it requires a mount kit.

  • 31 people drives a shitty Ford or Kia

  • What a complete waste of time and money. Those v6 motors are not high performing engines. They make good power because they are ment for big heavy vehicles like the pilot or accord. Unless you gut the motor completly and start from scratch, why bother. I wish all the new honda guys out there had as much knowlage about honda motors as they thought they did!!!! This car is about as pointless as putting a civic vx motor in another civic and thinking ya got somthing fast and kool!!!!

  • @lordnikon1213 With the V6 engine swap the Civic now does a 12.7 in the quarter mile. That's a performance car by any standard. Comparing a 92 horsepower VX engine swap to a 245 horsepower engine swap makes me wonder what you're thinking.

  • @hasportbrian Well of course it does good in the quarter, its a light car with a v6 truck motor in it!!!!DUH!!!!!

    And I wasent comparing the two motors,I was comparing the pointlessness of swaping either of the two motors into a car!!!!

  • @lordnikon1213 So let me get this right; it is pointless to make our car run a 12.7. Maybe as compared to puttting a B16 in it and run a 14.7. Still not seeing your point.

  • @hasportbrian I just dont see the point in doing all that work and fabrication for that motor that makes 245 hp when you could very easily do a h22 swap with a pro-charger and some ecu mods and get well over 300hp with alot less time and effort. Unless you guys just did the swap for the fun of it and budget reasons that is, then I could see that.

  • @lordnikon1213 Having driven turbocharged and supercharged K-series, turbocharged and supercharged B-series, and turbocharged H-series cars I say this compares favorably in the fun per $ category. And it is undeniably a head turner.

  • I got a big fatty win I seen this lol

  • Fuk now i have to find crzzymnn911's comment.

  • that is a really sick idea and a nice car :)

  • I have big respect for this

  • is the tl type s transmission a direct bolt on to the 3.5 honda pilot motor? any problems to look out for?

  • now i want to put on in my old integra lol

  • Well....this has got to be just an experiment type of thing because anybody with money would just slap a turbo on. This motor seems to be too heavy for the civic. I think a B series in there and ESPECIALLY a K series would kill this setup....but in the spirit of just sayin we did it just because..............I guess its cool :)

  • looks like they have the right idea. more cylinders. its not gonna handle like a civ tho

  • J-SERIES!!!

  • U took the civics 1 joy out of it put the v yech back in it's the reason it makes top end power kid

  • @MixQuisite

    I own an LS1 F-body. Stock LT1 cars are piss slow by comparison. 275 with the A/C on? NO.

  • Well at less its something different to look at.

  • SIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICK!!

  • did you have to end up cutting a hole in the hood??

  • Pretty good power considering it's a V6 from the Pilot which is 255 at the crank

  • i want to see the hood :P

  • what bout the hood? how does that go on

  • the car sounds like the tourque jx from midnight club 2

  • BIg Swap Nice Chrome, But all that for about as much HP as a Bone Stock 93 LT1. HUmmmm?

    

  • @MixQuisite

    Not chrome. That's also a very poor comparison, the Civic weighs much less than an LT1 F-body for sure.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • i would not go through all that trouble for 160hp, 2010 chevy cobalt ss turbo charged has the same hp and its a 4 cylinder

  • @1erno1 OMG, did you really compare that POS to this? Reliability issues aside, I mean... REALLY? A COBALT? *facepalm*

  • @chemao1978

    Cobalt? ha ha ha Isn't the equivalent to a pinto ha ha ha

  • @1erno1 Yeah but this is half the cost of the Chevy Cobalt SS.

  • how are you gonna close your hood?

  • turbo this bitch!

  • bro could u do this for honda crv???

  • i wanna swap my b16 for a c27. can you guys do that?

  • @1PARADOXXX No C, just J.

  • understeer will be a bit of an issue.

  • where did 2:43 go?

  • This awsome só what hood could go over that engine

  • (Look what the torque does after 45 that's wearied) Maybe your vtec chipped in!!

  • thanks for the idea's. my 95' accord with the 2.7 is a freaking mule.

  • @neverbackdownbrother -- this civic would smoke the si. It's thr biggest Honda engine in production. Nothing that comes from the honda factory will touch this civic except the s2000.

  • @domandape i know but i mean for example a b20vtec civic because i have one and i blow s2000

  • Hey thats Tim? From XactDyno? I'm having my GTI tuned there in like a week, bad ass civic by the way, I can't wait to tune my GTI!

  • would this engine in a civic out perform the more commonly used b/h/k series engines?

  • @neverbackdownbrother Much faster, it feels like a Supercharged K20 when driving.

  • is it vtec?

  • to jest kozka;)

    pozdro pl;)

  • anyone who thinks it sounds like a 4 cyl knows nothing about cars

  • oh and also, have you guys done a swap with the turbocharged MDX motors?

  • @xenx619

    You mean the RDX, that is the turbocharged Acura. Not MDX.

  • @chaseteter Whatever. You know what i meant.

  • @xenx619 No, there is only an automatic transmission that bolts to that block.