Sorry to say there is no market for a Jet like this. The R&D cost would be more thanyour profits. Plus you cannot fly at mach 1.0 over land due to regs.
A total pipe dream, Being an aeronautics engineer, The 1st problem you encounter is fuel to passenger ratio, Jumbo Jet 120 litres per passenger, Concorde 330 Llitres per passenger, this Pipe dream 450-500 litres per passenger. Engine to weight ratio is only capable of 721 mph or .981 Mach. I would put £100 on this never coming into service anytime soon. Concorde needed 12th cost service per 10 flights, so in a 100 flight year you could instead buy another plane. Sorry for the bad news, but THR.
$80 million for it. seats 4 to 6. 1,300+mph and yeah its great looking. oh also from NYC to Paris you'll save 3.5 hours. i just read up on this super sonic jet. very nice.
this plane is not a Supersonic Business Jet plane reasons because the plane engines is so pose to be built into the wing or into the body so it can go supersonic like the SR-71 blackbird or the concord.
i heard about this its called the QSST wich is Quiet supersonic Transporation
it said to go over 1,100 mph without creating big booms when your breaking the soundbarrier instead of creating small booms therefore it makes it a supersonic quiet transporation
i read about this plane in popular mechanics. it can break the sound barrier without a sonic boom. can you do that? i guess you have to make it stealth and add a nuke to realize how amazing this plane is...
Breaking the sound barrier without creating a sonic boom is a plausible concept - all you need to do is control the sound waves. I guess if they are quiet enough then they won't create a boom. That's really all I know though, I'm sure they have concluded methods of going about it.
Lines look too fussy! Look at successful supersonic fighters, they're mostly streamlined and wings aren't sticking out all over the place! Also with motors under the wing fod probably will be a regular occurrence! But then the days of looks right, flies right are long gone.
The background plate of the hanger, car and people has a black edge but the plane runs over that edge right to the sides of the screen??
tommyboomboom 1 month ago
Looks like the SR-71 Blackbird fathered a child with a Learjet.
Silentghost45 4 months ago
I want one!
stealangel1971 6 months ago
Not fair to the viewers, no data , no commentary !
akayemm8 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear All,
I have some questions about psychology:
(1) Why do we want to travelling in our own private aeroplane?
(2) Why so we want to pilot our own private jet?
(3) Why do we want to have a shower in private jet?
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creatrive ideas and brainstorm!!! :)
applesweeter 1 year ago
Sorry to say there is no market for a Jet like this. The R&D cost would be more thanyour profits. Plus you cannot fly at mach 1.0 over land due to regs.
Marty45187 2 years ago
That's cute. Around 1:10 in the vid, those people would have been scorched to death by the engine exhaust.
CmdrGendoIkari 2 years ago 2
C'mon....build it already!
krislyttle 2 years ago
At 3:12 it looks like a real plane not a simulation :)
Dragonarica 2 years ago
ya i was gona say the same thing
badboy81791 2 years ago
SAI QSST
A380sebster 2 years ago
A total pipe dream, Being an aeronautics engineer, The 1st problem you encounter is fuel to passenger ratio, Jumbo Jet 120 litres per passenger, Concorde 330 Llitres per passenger, this Pipe dream 450-500 litres per passenger. Engine to weight ratio is only capable of 721 mph or .981 Mach. I would put £100 on this never coming into service anytime soon. Concorde needed 12th cost service per 10 flights, so in a 100 flight year you could instead buy another plane. Sorry for the bad news, but THR.
stevebairdchef 3 years ago
"Being an aeronautics engineer,"
So, based on this claim of yours, I should disregard the track record of the Lockheed skunk works?
They built the SR-71, and the F117 stealth fighter. They've got a track record that anyone would envy. What have you accomplished, sparky?
-jcr
NSResponder 2 years ago
You may be an aeronautics engineer, but you're not an economist. The target market paid $75m for the jet, they can afford $25k per flight in fuel.
PlatoCantRepent 2 years ago
$80 million for it. seats 4 to 6. 1,300+mph and yeah its great looking. oh also from NYC to Paris you'll save 3.5 hours. i just read up on this super sonic jet. very nice.
LuxuriousLuxembourg 3 years ago 4
@LuxuriousLuxembourg it sound a lot but to be honest it isnt really
patko1610 1 year ago
@LuxuriousLuxembourg It's out of production. No funding.
Jayz159ify 5 months ago
at 2:18-20 it looks like its a british airways jet lool :P
burnsyliam 3 years ago
this plane is not a Supersonic Business Jet plane reasons because the plane engines is so pose to be built into the wing or into the body so it can go supersonic like the SR-71 blackbird or the concord.
danielatom0 3 years ago
Looks fine. Would it be as economic as a Learjet?
Mikojan88 4 years ago
its amazing ow far technology has come! this plane is SWEET!
mileyfan99 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I would be more intertained if they made the thing crash
kolya2385 4 years ago
It's supposed to have supper-cruse. means it doesnt use afterburners to go supper-sonic.
flyboytgb 4 years ago
nice i can eat in it.supper:food sonic:fast=fast food.
flanker223 3 years ago
i heard about this its called the QSST wich is Quiet supersonic Transporation
it said to go over 1,100 mph without creating big booms when your breaking the soundbarrier instead of creating small booms therefore it makes it a supersonic quiet transporation
luckyvince 4 years ago
Stay aware people ! ! !
This is a prototype for the "Blair Force One" ;)
quaternion 4 years ago
this plane looks awesome from the back
aha
teamtd 4 years ago
i read about this plane in popular mechanics. it can break the sound barrier without a sonic boom. can you do that? i guess you have to make it stealth and add a nuke to realize how amazing this plane is...
ZodiacFalcon 4 years ago
Breaking the sound barrier without creating a sonic boom is a plausible concept - all you need to do is control the sound waves. I guess if they are quiet enough then they won't create a boom. That's really all I know though, I'm sure they have concluded methods of going about it.
MarkJGS 4 years ago
I think this is already a fact. USAF new fighter jet F22 can do just that.
DrLarry2007 4 years ago
its not a game
mtr4216 5 years ago
Cool video
GohanDBZ 5 years ago
Was this from a game? If I did Which one because I want to buy it. I adore that plane
meowser007 5 years ago
is this a game?
angelsweet80 5 years ago
Lines look too fussy! Look at successful supersonic fighters, they're mostly streamlined and wings aren't sticking out all over the place! Also with motors under the wing fod probably will be a regular occurrence! But then the days of looks right, flies right are long gone.
rnsaza 5 years ago
lol ending looks like the ending of starfox 64
omgHARLAN 5 years ago
And if they didn't die, they still live today.
KaratePilz 5 years ago
yea, weird song but it fit the video very well
PissSniffer 5 years ago
Well, Tom Hanks plays the main character in both Apollo 13 and Forrest Gump ;-) Thanks for replying btw
prinsvaffla 5 years ago
Heard that first song before, either in "Apollo 13" or in "The right Stuff"...
prinsvaffla 5 years ago
actually it was in forrest gump...close tho
oogiboogy 5 years ago
No. The song was from the movie "The Rocketeer".
0V3CHKiN 4 years ago 5
points for you!
ZodiacFalcon 3 years ago
yep...songs so silly lolz...:D
bbaracudaa 5 years ago
damn sounds like a disney song
blazian1011 5 years ago