Added: 1 year ago
From: dannypantsgm
Views: 18,099
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (582)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Re the tides.

    I recall being at the beach on holiday with my family as a kid of 6 or 7, a 1/4-or-so Moon visible up among the clouds, and my folks taking the time to tell me how it affects the oceans.

    Dad was an ex-navy school-teacher, Mum an ex-nurse. Neither were scientists so they didn't get into the whole shebang with gravitational constants and anti-tides, but as a result I grew up with the "Moon-Tides" thing as simply another cultural meme.

    O'Reilly must have had a shit childhhod..

  • 4:32 Hank Hill

  • watching Bill just annoys me so I avoid his crap is easy when not living in the usa

  • Could someone tell me the piece of music at the end, anyway great video, almost reminded me of reading cosmos...

  • Not bad... But this shit is all guess work. YOU dont know for a 100% fact an answer to any of Bill's question. I dont believe in God. But I do believe in aliens. Thats all im gonna say here...

  • @wiiagent It's kind of imossible to know anything 100%. I don't know 100% if the sun will rise tomorrow, but I have lots of evidence to be pretty sure it will. So I wouldn't call similar evidence compiled for centuries by some of the most intelligent people in history "guess work".

  • @wiiagent Actually, science supports the idea that aliens exist. It doesn't say that, for a matter of fact, aliens in other solar systems DO exist or have visited our planet. But it would be extremely unlikely that, in the entire universe, only one planet, relatively young at that, has lifeforms of some kind. Also, science doesn't claim 100% irrefutable facts for most things. That's why they're called theories. And, even, laws may be disproven at some point

  • @wiiagent

    In real life, we do not separate information into either 100% certainty or random guess work. That is a very naive worldview. Nor is "that's just guess work" a valid counter-argument to the points made. You would need stronger evidence suggesting that it is false to replace it.

  • How did this video got on youtube? i can't explain that, neither you can!

  • Great video, well done:) man i hate Bill i wish he would be taken off tv!

  • good job!!

  • That image from Mars and your narration over it was surprisingly touching.

  • @phxsns1 I'm glad you think so. When you look at things a certain way it can be.

  • Good to know there are still educated people out there. :)

    Thanks for this video. Made my day

  • @xRyxRyx Glad you liked it. Thanks for watching : )

  • Comment removed

  • Bill has a Harvard degree.... you can't explain that!

  • @ProfDrJura Bush had one too.

  • this guy is hopeless, just shoot yourself oreily, you win the dumest celebrity award.

  • ther's a lot of thing bill dosn't know, infact you can fill books with it, infact they did, and thaty why i read

  • @jannikmt rattatouie reference? sorry if i spelled it wrong

  • Oh my god.

    Oh my fucking god.

    lol

    Bill, oh Bill.

  • This is fucking hilarious!! Thank you!

  • I love you.

  • Internet > real live If you ask a question in real life and don't know you are the dumb ass and everyone knows that information about you which you hate.... online no one really knows you so you can ask away without looking dumb...

  • Bill O Reilly is a dumbass. Go Science !

  • Bill's argument was much better reasoned, and I believe it therefore its true, I also believe that the energizer bunny is satan in disguise, the ears cover the horns people! Anyone who doubts this is a pinhead, so checkmate, smart people, with your evidence!!

  • Most revealing was not the lack of basic science knowledge but the fact that Bill regards someone correcting him factually as an ATTACK by a PINHEAD.

    Bill's head is truly in a dark place, and there's no way it's coming back out - it's grown too large.

  • Well done Danny. And the only pinhead in bill's world IS Bill!

  • "What Bill O'Reilly Doesn't Know"

    I was wondering if you could post a video that long on Youtube.

  • This is without a doubt, one of the greatest videos i have ever seen. Well said brother! Have you heard any response from that pinhead?

  • @GaryCM4 Nah. But I didn't expect one. Thanks : )

  • I honestly think Pinhead O'Reilly is just putting on an act and does not believe the bs he shovels out . Its just for sad sacks who buy his books and watch his crappy tv shows.

  • you know, Bills always gettin on today's youth, making it seem like the youth of america are stupid and lazy and ruining america. Well, old man, it seems you keep proving YOUR the problem with America. Stupid people who wouldn't pick up a book to learn something if their life depended on it. LOOK IN A SECOND GRADE SCIENCE BOOK YOU ' PINHEAD"

  • Nice edit. Nice diversion with your monologue, and intro clip. I wonder what was said between the splice. The word "it" in the second clip could mean anything, but in context he was referring to the creation of the cosmos. You running with the moon bit is missing the point, and had the clip been left in its entirety, the topic at hand would have likely been more discernible.

  • @2012comefaster No.

    I linked his original video in the description box so you can watch it yourself if you don't believe me. But he clearly is not aware Mars had moons. That I wanted to address because it is simply wrong, and shows his lack of knowledge on the subject. He probably was using it to allude to creation, but that is the point of my video. You don't need to believe absurd things when natural explanations are more likely.

  • @2012comefaster Nice diversion trying to lie to cover up your buddy the sexual harassment specialist.

  • BILL O REILLY ISN'T SAYING MARS DOESN'T HAVE MOONS DUMBASS, he is saying why doesn't Mars have life and Earth does

  • @Darnter I went back and watched the original video and you're wrong. When he is still on the topic of Earth's moon he clearly asks how come we have that and Mars and Venus don't. Then he moves on to ask about life as a separate topic. But he very much did ask why Mars has no moon. So I wouldn't be using the term dumb ass so liberally if I were you.

  • @Darnter ahaha your the dumbass, thats exactly what bill was saying

  • the thing is you can still belive in a higher power, while knowing that science is correct. he doesn't seem to get that. He's it's all or nothing. Science is about finding how. Religion is about finding why. They are two sepertate things, something bill just doesn't get.

  • I think that you'll need longer than five minutes and forty eight seconds to explain everything Bill O'Reilly doesn't know.

  • The ending was great!

  • So in the words of a great 20th century poet... HIII MR. O'REEIIIIILYYYYY!!

    :)

  • I suppose memorizing an unabridged dictionary, worshiping the spirit of the antichrist (Catholicism) and leading dumb asses into the abyss by brain-washing their own opinions and transposing the opinions of his racist leaders, as the parrot he is, does not define O'Reilly's brilliance nor wisdom, now does it??lol

  • but the..tides..the moon.. papa bear..mars!--lol

  • 7 Dislikes...

    Bill,

    Bill's wife Maureen,

    Bill's two children,

    Bill's neighbor Fred & Fred's wife Suzie,

    And Bill's mom.

  • @rubberbaby00 Firearms- you can't explain that.

  • @Shonn1022 not to mention "fucking magnets"!

  • @gibadoo 'Wonder if mormons know.

  • @rubberbaby00 I LAUGHED AND LAUGHED AND LAUGHED

  • Hey Danny, thank you so much for your education, right here in the Caribbean island of Trinidad people are very superstitious and believe in the bible badly, I myself am an ametuer astronomer, and to get people excited about the universe is useless, or taken for a joke when we have telescope star viewing on public parks.

  • @hexidecimalAFF0 I'm very sorry to hear that man. Hopefully one day most will understand.

  • First of all, science is wrong all the time, so I generally try to avoid repeating what scientists told me unless I investigate more into it myself. (e.g., I don't buy the global warming stuffs) Second, it still doesn't answer, for example, where the basic physics come from, where fundamental logic comes from, where energy and matter come from, etc. Bill can always ask about those. I prefer a more direct response "prove it is created by your god, not by the spaghetti monster"

  • @logicandfact Essentially I'm saying everything has a natural explanation. So there's no reason to think the origin of the universe won't have one as well.

  • @dannypantsgm The HYPOTHESIS about the moon is exactly that. A hypothesis. That is not science. It can not be tested. There is so much scientific evidence disproving what you would call "science" that it would hurt your feelings. You have FAITH that the Earth is billions of years old, that evolution happened, and that science can explain how we came to be. You are free to beleive that, but by definition you have what is called a "religion". Think hard before replying.

  • @cLcnumber31 I've seen the so called "science" which supposedly disproves what I would call science. I find it's methods lacking, it's conclusions poorly reached, and it's proofs laughable. It is constantly having to be corrected on almost every level by people who most of us know as actual scientists. And do you know why I side with them? It's because I don't find their methods lacking, their conclusions poorly reached, or their proofs laughable. I don't need faith. I can trust my own eyes.

  • @dannypantsgm Have you ever heard of Polonium 218? Also known as Polonium halos. I won't assume anything on your part, but if you haven't you really need to look into it.

  • @cLcnumber31 Matter of fact I have. I read that whole paper by Robert Gentry.... AND the one ripping it to shreds by John Brawley...AND the second one... and the one ripping THAT to shreds by Thomas A. Baillieul. Also, Gentry's testimony even failed to convince Judge William Overton in the McLean v. Arkansas case where it was decided once again that creation "science" was not constitutional to teach beside actual science in public schools.

  • GREAT video, bill oreilly is a fucking moron, i cant believe he is on american tv...

  • bill knows that he is full of bullshit on every single one of his youtube vids comments are disabled y do u think that is because he knows that people will rip his arguments apart

  • "You see bill the problem is poeple actually listen to you" Thats a bingo! that's how you say it right 'that's a bingo'

  • Please accept my round of applause. Very well done.

  • Bill O'Reilly is the second biggest troll ever. Westboro Baptist Church wins out by a hair.

  • Nice video! Hope Bill sees this.

  • HE HE Bill said a funny word..

  • What are you a scientist? Y'all muthafuckas' lyin' and gettn' me piss'd.

  • I must ask, why can't I believe in both science and Christianity? This video definitely kicked O'Reilly's ass, and I like that, but why not have both?

  • "I must ask, why can't I believe in both science and Christianity?"

    You can, but first you need a degree in beliefology, a certificate of pwnworthiness and a stable faith history of testimonial evidence for personal revelation, question begging, fallacy non-sequitur proficiency and then several years of experience in contrived rhetoric, applied absurdity and ad-hock confabulation. Extra consideration will be given, for peevish whining, playing the victim card and inverting the burden of proof.

  • @skepticoz Well would ya' look at that! I have all of those! I also have a PHD in Tally-Holology. Good show! On top of that, I have a job at the renowned Worcestershire Academy Club of Whatnot and Tea Engineering.

  • @Shonn1022 Good show ol' chap! I expect with all that, you could believe in science, Christianity, voodo and the flying spaghetti monster. Keep up the good work. One can never have too many beliefs you know. ; )

  • @skepticoz I hold many different beliefs, old horse. Remember Alcatraz? ZOMBIES.

  • @Shonn1022 You can if you want. However, the point is that when a person doesn't know something they should research it instead of just saying "god dun it."

  • @amberview30 How I see it: Everything can be proved scientifically. Also, I believe that God and Science are not two separate things, but two names for one... entity? What I mean by this isn't that science is magical (obviously) or any nonsense like that, but in the bible, God says His name is "I am" which means he IS everything, not some separate being. There are many figures of speech and hidden meanings that you really have to look hard for. If you want, I can elaborate on this a little.

  • @Shonn1022 as I said, you can and others can believe in both. But I am thankful that Scientists do research to find out how things work and the why. It does no harm to anyone when an individual believes something. It is actions that matter to more. With O'Reilly, he doesn't seem to care that we know how these things came to be or work. He would rather say "god dun it" and call people pinheads rather than research his answers.  I have no respect for that. I'm glad scientists don't do that.

  • @amberview30 I agree. I don't like how some people at my church used to say that we couldn't believe in disney movie magic, but had to believe that's how we got here? Huh-uh. *coughtheuniversewasn'treallyc­reatedinsevenliteraldayscough* Hmm... I should see a doctor about that cough of mine.

  • I felt like giving you standing ovation, Danny.

  • @poniesinashed Go ahead, follow your heart, i won't mind. ; )

  • Comment removed

  • BTW you hit a "Head Shot" when you compared Bill'O to an old dog that cant be taught new tricks, justice prevailed.

  • thank you, i love things that are hilarious and true

  • after all that you said Lunar Eclipse :( May it never be! Rather, let God be found true, though every man be found a liar, as it is written, "THAT YOU MAY BE JUSTIFIED IN YOUR WORDS, AND PREVAIL WHEN YOU ARE JUDGED."

    thank you for your video I appreciate your effort :) God Bless in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth

  • URL goes in, Youtube comes out. Can't explain that

  • nearly 13,000 views lmao Good job dan the man :)

  • @HuisTenBosch2012 Thanks : )

  • Fantastic Video Danny, I've subscribed and will continue to watch your content in the future, awesome stuff!

  • 1. The Moon got there when a Mars-sized object crashed into Earth and the debris formed into the Moon.

    2. The Sun got there when a bunch of hydrogen and helium and dust came together and got superheated.

    3. Mars DOES have a moon. It has TWO. Phobos and Deimos.

  • @civilian4life

    lol u trollin....I hope...

  • This video doesn't take account the fact that the world didn't exist prior to June 5th, 1986. Everything that supposedly happened before that was fabricated, and all this evidence planted by the creators to throw us off of the truth! You might say, "But I remember the '70s!" to which I simply answer, those are false memories planted to throw you off. Or you're a robot. I haven't decided yet.

  • @dannypantsgm It is an excellent response. Thanks for posting this great video.

  • Using God as a explanation for what we dont know is retarded. Sience has a waaaay more humble approach to the universe, sience admits that it dont know everything. It is incredibly arrogant attitude, claming that you have it all figured out.

  • @l0rdoflol Science

  • Omg... i hadn't seen Billo's response to the people talking about his stupid 'tide goes in, tide goes out; shit. He's really gonna sit there and call the people explaining scientific processes to him pinheads? Lmao, and they let this guy brainwash millions of people... That's disgusting.

    Thanks for explaining Astronomy 101 to him heh, too bad he probably won't hear it.

  • I never knew that about the moon. Thanks! I think it is really hard for some people to accept that some things are unknown and may never be known.

  • That one moon of Mars looks like the death star.

  • Hey I didn't know a lot of this stuff and it was very interesting. Sadly Bill uses the debate tactics of a three year old he will simply repeat why over and over again until you answering strange abstract questions and he will continue down this line of questioning until you have absolutely no idea what is being asked. Bill will then use this as a sign that he is right. It is kind of depressing because as you said people actually listen to his dribble.

  • @rsaylors Oh, and here goes the "religion has a positive social influence" defense. I'm sorry for what happened in your life, and I understand, that you must feel grateful for your salvation to those people, but you must realize, that you're just a piece of work, that Social Workers never got to do. Go on and improve Social Service, if it's inefficient. Make advances in understanding of Human psychology and Theory of Education, so that what happened to you won't ever happen again to anyone.

  • @rsaylors The concepts of religions, and the concept of Social Welfare are completely separable from each other. Or do you really believe, that people can't be kind and spreading their kindness around, unless threatened with hell in the afterlife? Then I really can't help you. Social service done by churches is just yet another way to get them new adepts. Genuine concern about well-being of other people is a slightly different thing. I hope you'll see the difference eventually.

  • @rsaylors Even if you use faith as a catalyst for getting out of a bad place or giving up narcotics, it doesn't prove God let alone Christ. It only proves you had the power to better your situation in you all along. Faith may bring it out but that doesn't make it anything other than something you believe.

  • Comment removed

  • Good one Danny, keep up the good work. Billyboy isnt just an old dog who cant learn any thing new... Well come to think of it he is a DOG. No, Billyboy is just the King of all PINHEADS, who thinks that he souldn't be attacked for his beliefs, but that he has the right to attack others, but only in a fair and ballanced way.

  • whats with the face at the end? o_0

  • HAHAHA this doesn't disprove anything. Science doesn't kick God out of the picture. It only further expands our understanding of how He does what He does. Science and God work great together. Anyone who says one cancels out the other is ignorant and narrow minded.

  • @ianthecosmonaut Indeed, if you wanted to believe a god of the gaps, no problem. Current science has the gap in knowledge down to a bit less than a microsecond at the very beginning of the universe. That's a cute little god you got there. But no, science and your imaginary friend don't really work together. They are by definition non-interactive. As soon as something is testable or observable, it is under the scope of science, and not faith. Faith is defined as belief without evidence.

  • @willsquish

    Cute little god I got there? Let's not be condescending. That doesn't help anyone's case. Who defined faith as belief without evidence? Do you believe that filling up your car with gasoline will keep your vehicle running? Probably, and I bet it's because after hundreds of trips to the petrol station it is evident that your car will keep running as long as you keep filling it up. You don't KNOW that it will. But you certainly believe it will.

  • @ianthecosmonaut I believe my car will keep running if I put gasoline based on previous experience. The evidence that is based on my observations, in addition to what is in the manuals and seeing my parents fill up their cars, and the fact that I test this observation means it's not faith. I didn't say I know there is no imaginary friend. I said the evidence isn't there for one, and the tests of specific gods have come back with only refutation. Cute is a term of endearment, don't worry.

  • Perhaps you mean that faith is defined as belief without seeing? That would make more sense. Anyway. To say there is no evidence of a creator is silly. I work in courtrooms and have the opportunity to observe the process of murder trials several times a year. I know what evidence is. There is an enormous list of evidences to say that a creator is quite probable. I suggest you do some research. There are more scientists who are convinced of a creator or god than you probably think.

  • @ianthecosmonaut Other people being convinced as a matter of faith means nothing to me or any science minded person. Who says something means nothing. Why means everything. I suggest you do some research. No scientific evidence goes toward the god idea. In fact a non-specific god is not even a hypothesis. To be science, it must be falsifiable. And false god tests so far have its followers claiming "mysterious ways" defense. It's nonscience and hence nonsense, aka faith.

  • If there really was a god, there would be no need for religion.

  • good job danny

  • 4:45 - Hey, a crescent!! Allah hu akbar?!

  • Nice work Danny. I have such contempt for that ignorant windbag Bill O'Reilly. Everytime I hear him dribble off his "Tide go in, tide go out...sun goes up, sun goes down" bullshit, it makes me want to punch him in his fat face. But you are correct, he would never listen to your scientific explanation (which is what he is asking for). He would only call you a pinhead and keep pushing "where did all that 'stuff' come from? Explain that! Clearly god had to create it." Suck it Bill you ass!

  • No matter how great is the idea of Heaven & Hell the destination of our soul depending on what we did in our life time.

    Religion is a dead-end reflection's way. If you wanna understand you got to ask questions and look forward about the anwser.

    How comes there are 3 commons religions and hundreds of branches from them ? Even religious can't have the same answer, simply because God can't be.

    This in mind, religion is more a way of life, a philosophy and have to stay that way.

  • Nobody created God, if someone did the question would then be who created that person/being. God is self existent and there is nothing that would cause that to be impossible such as a universe created out of nothing or life springing from non living things (get my point). If a bunch of people were halucenating in the desert they would not all have the same interpretations of those visions and finally I glad you admit that science can not really explain what happened. They tell our kids diff.

  • A universe from nothing.... yeah that makes sense! I have a jar of pickles in the fridge, maybe that came from nothing as well. Anybody with 1/2 a brain knows that there is only one thing that can come from nothing and thats nothing! DUH! From nothing nothing exist--pretty basic

  • I could call you people idiots because you have a different opinion but who does that make me any better than you? You claim religion will not exist in 230 years, well for all of human history it was hard to find a place where religion did'nt exist so by the way I see it athiesm has around 6000 of catching up to do. Do you still feel so cocky?

  • It's also the Sun's gravity pulling on the oceans.

  • This guys knows his stuff :]

  • I like how I learnt this when I was in elementary school.

  • Thank you, Mr. Pants. You made my day :D

  • No this shows what religion does to people . And about big bang , there are number of theories about what started big bang ,like multiply-universe theory and others, like one big alien sim master created all the universe .

  • That doesn't disprove religion, only flat out creationism.

  • @jotunobsidianeyes Which is a religion.

  • @dannypantsgm Creationism isn't a religion. It's a belief :P

  • @jotunobsidianeyes

    I wouldn't get too worked up about the whole thing. Science is always changing and evolving as time goes on. What scientists thought about the moon a couple hundred years ago is completely different now days. In a few more hundred years we will probably learn knew things and update the theories we got wrong.

  • @jotunobsidianeyes ok it still breaks the back of religion. and thats just the beginning.

  • Nice!

  • Since science is far too complex for Bill, I'll just ask this mind-exploding question: "How'd God get there?" Boom.

  • Somebody took a shit in the toilet without flushing. I don't know who did it so it must be God.

  • Bill O'Really? Ha! What a dolt he is. Thanks for the video Danny.

  • Hey hey now, O'Reilly might be daft but don't say that all theist in the world are stupid because of his bad example.

    The Catholic Church as accepted evolution, the Big Bang, and I assume most of these theories as well, for example.

  • @HelenKellersArmy Oh the good old catholic church hows all that pedophilia going?

  • @ahdeath2007

    Don't know; I'm not Catholic.

    I was just giving an example.

  • People who take O'Rielly serious and listen to, are all fucking idiots!

  • It takes a universe to make a mind? Well regardless if that is true or not I still have not heard an athiest explain whats behind the big bang. All the evidence points to the universe having its beginning at the big bang. What caused the big bang? Where did the matter come from? How does order and complexity come out of disorganization and chaos (this goes against the basic law that things start in order and descend into disorder and chaos). God is a perfectly reasonable explanation.

  • @volkl78 My thinking on it is based on what I see happening now. I see matter switch states. I see order and chaos go back and forth. I see simplicity grow to complexity. All on their own. All according to natural laws playing on each other. I see no invisible hand necessary to direct these things which happen autonomously. So when I consider the initial expansion I see no reason it had to be conducted by a divine hand. If the birth of a solar system can happen on it's own, why not the universe?

  • @volkl78 Oh, sorry. I didn't realize you were the same person as before. I just repeated myself.

  • @volkl78 If the possibilities are potentially infinite, I don't see how one answer (God) is reasonable. Even without the science backing it up, the biggest flaw with Bill's (and your) arguments is that even if any of the current theories science has produced end up being proven incorrect at some point in time or another, that doesn't make God (very specifically a God based on Bill's or anyone's ideologies) plausible, much less reasonable.

  • @volkl78 Then, who created god? See god is an excuse for human ignorance. Just because no one can explain what really happened doesn't mean god did it. Science tries to search for answers through research and study, you're just making conclusions based on a book made by hallucinating desert people.

  • @volkl78 One can sit hear and explain to idiots (i mean religious fanatics, not religious open-minded individuals) how the things in the universe "got here". The amount of people in America that believe in religion is slowly decreasing (currently 16% are Atheist), current trends set the complete abolishment of religion off of this planet is 226 years. A lot less time to explain to you idiots about the world you live in, grow up.

  • @volkl78 There's a video on youtube called "A Universe from Nothing", or something similar. Look for it, it explains the quantum fluctuations that caused the Big Bang.

  • @volkl78 I posit that a giant magical bunny rabbit pooped out the universe with all its complexity. The fart the immediately preceded the pooping is now known as the big bang. Science can't disprove this hypothesis therefore it too is a perfectly reasonable explanation.

  • @dgr812

    Pff, Bunnyism is stupid. Obviously the giant eternal intangible KFC chicken laid a big egg from which the universe was hatched... That's why we have so many KFC temples; to honor our Great Creator.

  • @volkl78

    No, atheism is not about this anyways.

    Let's say the Big Bang happened, because it's a pretty solid theory.

    The Big Bang does not require a cause;

    Causation requires time

    Time was created in the Big Bang

    The Big Bang didn't have cause

    In quantum physics it is possible for something to come from 'nothing'. because a cause can occur after the effect.

    I suggest you watch a video called 'a universe from nothing'.

    Even if we didn't have an explanation, there's no reason to believe in God.

  • @volkl78

    Matter comes from white holes.

  • @volkl78

    Where did god come from? Where did he get the material to make the universe? See, you're just taking a question and adding another layer to it to make it even LESS feasible.

  • The real sickening thing is that Bill O'Reilly is probably the most "sane" (for lack of a better word) on FOX "news".

    Epsecially when it come to fuck tards like Glen Beck, that lying manakin Megan Kelly, or that biblcial fascist Palin.

  • Bill O is a fucking deliberate idiot. Of course there might be some questions we don't have an answer for.

    That doesn't somehow mean that whatever he believes is automatically right. Or that he just gets to fill in the blanks with bronze age fairly tales.

    Wht the fuck is a matter with people like that.

  • @atheistrage Too much space in between their ears.

  • @nxvznx If you REALLY think Billo is such a deep-thinking existentialist then you're obviously a bigger fucking moron than he is...if you want to know how and why things exist in the universe I suggest a few science classes to broaden your knowledge base, or just remain an idiot...also

  • All Billo heard was "Science blah blah blah Dense matter Blah blah blah... fusion bah blah blah.

    His teeny brain can't comprehend things beyond the purvey of Jesus.

    You Pinhead, you.

    It's scary how certain parts of the USA seem to have an intense hatred for intelligence.

  • Bill got fuckin shit on in this video! But unfortunately what the thinker thinks the prover proves.

  • Well Bill you'd have be brave enough to learn enough not to be ignorant. And brave enough to admit a gap in our knowledge doesn't any more imply that a old man with a beard did it than did the Easter Bunny.

  • Man... Is Bill a human being? Seriously? Is he?

  • If the universe is eternal then it can not possibly of been created so its one or the other. All the evidence from the "Big Bang" suggest that the universe had a beginning so that implies a creation event, how it happened is up for debate. The cause and effect argument can not be ignored but understand that I am not saying because we dont know the cause that means the cause is God. I'm not saying that I am saying however it is a logical possibility.

  • I nearly wet myself when I saw this footage for the first time. Bill, Crack open a high school science book, you bloated old bastard...

  • @nxvznx I agree. What he is trying to fill it with is though is God. This video is meant to show natural explanations for things in order to suggest the origins of our universe are likely of the same nature.

  • @dannypantsgm annoyingly the questions he's asking all can be explained by science the moon was a chunk of the earth that broke off during a colision and that piece was bound to us by gravity to this very day or so the theory goes it seems the most likely in my opinion on the

  • @dannypantsgm oh you mention that in ur your video good on ya mate

  • im siding with you on what you say but wait a minute i thought the moon was formed billions of years ago after another planet collided with the (molten) earth and the moon had separated from the (newer) earth?

  • @edwinm1 That's right.

  • 6 people believe in Astrology.

  • There are only 2 possibilities the first is that the universe is eternal the second is that it is not, if the universe is not eternal then something or someone must have created it call it God or whatever you want. Take the big bang theory, what caused the matter to explode? There is a thing called cause and effect so what was the cause? Where did the matter come from. How is it that from chaos came such amazing order. Science has no answers to these questions, they know where it leads.

  • @volkl78 What we call order is just the result of natural laws and processes working themselves out, which they do autonomously. And there's no reason to think that just because we can live in it that it is necessarily the best order that could have come about. As to what caused it to start, when we look at all natural processes and beginnings everywhere else, their beginnings are usually simple little events which lead to greater complexity. Chain reactions. Likely the universe stared similar.