Dance with death (c-400)

[normison69]

Stealth wont save you from this, nothing actually but except luck that it fails to start the missile might save any plane in the skies. It will eat F-22 Raptors for breakfast and Tomahawks for luch and nuclear ICBM:s for dinner.

[TyphoonUSSR]

@normison69 You do not understand who is dancing. In this salt. F-22 Raptors and ICBM that goal, not a threat. They dance with death (c-400).

[Perseiden2]

cool. Good thins Russia is not communist anymore.

[MrHenceWorstIII]

The investment from oil and gas exports to western Europe I guess...

[serega3000]

peace!

[USAmilitarypower]

psh dancing with death in about 10 years lasers will be manditory on planes to shoot missiles down

[OnixToaster]

@USAmilitarypower  HAHAHA!!! Laser project was fail and closed!

[USAmilitarypower]

@OnixToaster no the usa has 1 yal-1 instead of 8 but allot of the lases are very cheap the usa already has them on some c5's

[USAmilitarypower]

@OnixToaster no the usa has 1 yal-1 instead of 8 but allot of the lases are very cheap the usa already has them on some c5's

[USAmilitarypower]

@OnixToaster no the usa has 1 yal-1 instead of 8 but allot of the lases are very cheap the usa already has them on some c5's

[StiviGun1]

What I like about the Russian S-300 and S-400, as opposed to the Patriot, is that everything on them is automated and this vastly decreases the emplacement time. Which is very important in a war. But this is where the proofs that this systems is better than the Patriot stop. The system has never been used in battle, so no one knows exactly how good it is. Which is why I'm amazed of how many experts consider it better than the Patriot. They don't know anything about it, but they consider it

[StiviGun1]

better...

[MrSrgj]

@StiviGun1

[Talshet]

@StiviGun1 Your wrong. S300 take several American aircrafts down. But this will never be report in usual medias because its act of war when someone is flying into other sovereignty over the airspace. And the S400 can take Satalites down. Patriot can only take usual aircrafts down.

[StiviGun1]

@Talshet OK, so when exactly did the S-300 take down several American planes and what type of airplanes were? As for S-300, from what I know, it only has an engagement altitude of 30km, not nearly enough for taking down satellites. As for Patriot, it can also take down missiles. The PAC-3 version has its capabilities completely focused on anti-missile defense. The PAC-2 has also been improved a lot since the Gulf War. So Patriot's capabilities are not just against aircraft.

[Talshet]

@StiviGun1 just make some researches about cold war spionage. The S300 take 3 spionage US aircrafts down. They entered the russian air space and they destroyed them.During the Cold war US had more than 25000 spionage missions only in DDR. They started 1000 on soviet union, soviets destroyed few spionage "stealth" submarines.Several Spionage Aircrafts. 100 over 100 of CIA agents who tried to get on soviet territory.S300 called 300 for his range,to underrate their own capability is propaganda ...

[StiviGun1]

@Talshet OK, so what type of airplanes did the S-300 shoot down? And what type of "stealth submarines" did the soviets destroy?

[Talshet]

@StiviGun1 To underrate military capabilites is an old psychological warfare or just propaganda, to let the oppenent think their superior to others and dont invest more money and time for new and better tech.The USA does it often like the air to air missile AIM120 they give infos of the range, and it was only about 30-40 kms but the thruth comes years after that information, it was capable to reach more than 3 times the range.And this is only an example i know about.There lot of stuff underrated

[StiviGun1]

@Talshet Hmm.. I've never read any article that said the AIM120 only had a 30-40km range... Where did you get this from? As for that type of psychological warfare, there are many people, (many of them I-m sure are Russian agents) that totally exaggerate America's capability in order 2 make the Congress and president believe there's no need for America to invest in its military. If you ask me, America doesn't practice this type of warfare, it is has this type of warfare conducted against it.

[MegaDAJAN]

ya tak rad shto moya strana ARMENIA PREOBREL S-400 PRAVDA U NAS EST NESKOLKO KOMPLEQSOV S -300 NO S-400 NE BILO TEPER UJE EST!!! UXXX AZERINI DERJITES

[firedixon71]

пипец всем

[vrulj1986]

Правильно покрашен, матовой краской как в советские времена она не даёт бликов на солнце, а в дождь она темнеет вобщем полностью сливается с природой.

Очень хорошее оружие- Я ГОРЖУСь!!!

[TheRussianWelder]

из России с любовью!

[SERSHANT]

great !