Well I know a guy with to Gm trucks both 97s and they have 260 thousand miles on them and they still run Great. I talked to this guy at my School, he owns a 1999 Jeep Cherokee and its has 297 thousand miles on it and it Sounded great and Ran Perfect, so that is Why im Buying myself a Jeep Cherokee soon i Hope.
My 2000 Grand caravan's transmission has far out lasted my uncle's second transmission in his Camry, all cars are great, it just depends on how you take care of them, if you never change the oil idc what car or campany it is, it's gonna fail, proper maintance is everything..
I'm not a fan of toyota anymore either. There were complaints on Power Steering in the newest generation of Corolla, Gas Pedal which is very common, and their brakes just started to fail up a bit. And their cars get more boring and boring. I'm also not a fan of Chrysler (makes Dodge and Jeep). GM (Chevrolet and GMC) and Ford are the vehicles I really want to buy.
I have a taurus with 500,000 miles on it, with all documentation. No rebuilds on engine or tranny.
And sorry put if a car has a bad engine then rebuild it and its fixed and take care of it. Its not really hard to do. Most people are just either poor or lazy or both. I'm just saying that most cars are built to a standard other wise the company wouldn't last as long. I also have a K-car that is 25 years old and I drive it every day. Its American and it lasted. there's the prove
Glad my dad drives one, it used to be my moms, but now its his, its got 165k miles on it, now i fell safe with him in it, not his old deathtrap Geo Tracker.
The vauxhall/opel sintra only got a 2 star EURONCAP rating.The Sintra was overwhelmed on impact the steering wheel broke off its column and the driver faced a threat of fatal neck injury because his head was forced back and upwards. Opel has says it has now taken steps from it from snapping off. The car was awarded three stars, but the final star has been struck through to indicate NCAP's fears over fatal injury. Opel has announced that the Sintra is being withdrawn from sale
My crash into a stationary object in this very model was at 70MPH into a car at a stop light. Falling alseep at the wheel is easier than you think. Also, seatbelts save lives. Always wear one.
Yes, Sir what is your problem All there are the same F@#%* shit take a a look in my vid my old 2002 Chrysler another shit like my 1998 Montana.................and F@#$%* all
ok, chryslerminivans1111... you are dumb! Chrysler is shit and GM or "GENERAL" Motors as normal english writing people spell it; rules... no doubts about it
ok, chryslerminivans1111... you are dumb! Chrysler is shit and GM or "GENERAL" Motors as normal english writing people spell it; rules... no doubts about it
ok, chryslerminivans1111... you are dumb! Chrysler is shit and GM or "GENERAL" Motors as normal english writing people spell it; rules... no doubts about it
ok you admit it they updated the name but not the desighn ha and so since i proved you wrong you try to bring up whos companys in worse shape proved you wrong there too. man you are hitting duds arnt you
also that v6 chryslwer has has a damn timming belt not even equipped with a chain, so cheap no vvt nothing it blows. i changed a water pump on the 3.5 before you have to take the timming cover off its horrible. and the valve cover are stamped steel just like the 3.3 and the 3.8 cheap
yes but its dohc Not push rod ohv but if thats the case 3.6L it produces 275 hp (205 kW)and has been certified by the SAE to produce 302 hp what about those apples
ok also the 3.1 started off as the 2.8 in the 80's and then grew from there now its up to the 3.5 displacement look at the impala and other gm vans and cars with the 3.5 its still the same engine. also pound for pound The 3.3L chrysler v6 vs 3.5l v6 the gm is less powerful. simply sad
It was produced from 1989 through the present and was commonly paired with the Chrysler 3.3 engine in transverse engined cars. The Ultradrive and its descendants are produced at Kokomo Transmission in Kokomo, Indiana.
there is no way that chrysler vans are reliable there not. There powertrains are iron block iron head pushrod engines that have horrible issues with oil consumsion and dont even get me started about transmissions.
the 97-04 have got an overall of 4stars... BUT they were rated POOR because there was LITTLE survival space. and the forces on the foot caused it to break off. the steering coloum didnt colapse in.
and if these mythical changes were made in 2001 then they wouldve been retested, but the only changes in 2001 was a refreshed grille. the 2004 models were the same damn thing as the 1997 models. CHEAP AND UNSAFE AS HELL!
Hey Chryslerminivans1111 and GMminivans9968 you guys need to get a fuckin life. I mean fighting over minivans, who the hell are you guys fucking soccer moms? And besides Honda and Toyotas minivans are far safer than any of the shit boxes from GM Chrysler and even Ford. If you guys wanna stop being little soccer mom bitches who wine about vans all day then go fight over trucks. Trust me its way more fun.
um that is NOT the roof rack. its the cross bars. the roof rack is screwed into the sheet metal. and anyway the Chrysler minivans have ALWAYS been safer than the gm shitboxes and them ford pos!
um Chrysler will always be around. GM just lost 39BILLION dollars. THE MOST OF ANY COMPAY EVER! they wont be around much longer. and i will laugh my ass off when they file for bankrupcy!
gm minivans have a resale value anywhere from $2,000 to $5,500 lower than a compariable Chrysler in the same condition. and ford minivans have an average of $1,500 less resale value than a Chrysler.
go to Kelly Blue Book and try it.
and if you say "fuck kbb" or "screw kbb" or anything of that nature... then i proved you wrong!
european test are identical to the american test. 40mph and every thing. but the LHD scored less than the RHD! it is like that on most vehicles. and the 97-04 gm minivans got 0stars in the ncap test! haha!
3.1 3.4 3.5 3.8 3.9 all have intake flaws that pour coolant in and destroys the engine. and the above engines are soo poor designed that they have piston slap!
if you are gonna say anything sucks. provide us with more info. what are the miles... has the vehicle been abused? most ofter the van has 140,000 miles. been abused. (it cant be abused if a 70 year old woman drives it all the time and is the only driver). so it prolly does have 140k miles and abused too!
my parents drive theres. and 2000$ to fix? its only 1200$. and how do you know its never been abused? are you with them everytime they drive it? when sombody borrows it? didnt think so!
I'm not here saying dodge rules or anything but when it came to safety, gas mileage and general options on a minivan, the caravan pretty much falls into that category, of course Honda and Toyota are superior in durability and longevity. Not all of us can spend that much on a vehicle. The Caravans fits the tight budget families.
When u buy a minivan I hope that most buyers intentions are that I need t a vehicle to keep my family safe in getting then from point A to point B. How can u even make a remark in saying GM minivans rule when it's plain and simple that the children in the back seat would see their parents being crushed in an accident?
You might want to watch that again, the middle Cross members rails are what flew off the roof rail assembly, the part that's bolted to the roof did not come off. Then again I own one so I know what they look like.
again gm is known for unreliable minivans. this proves my point exactly. and you just have to say somthin cocky to everybody who hates them. your so cocky, thats what you like to eat.
hey man GM is ok, but chrysler is better, they really are! so if you have such a thing for gm, why don't you f*ckin go work for the company and correct every mistake they make. i own a 2002 caravan, and my wife drives a 2003 montana, the montana has been giving us nothing but problems, all we had have to for the chrysler is put gas in it and go, but the gm is unreliable, but it is safe.
wow if you look at the bottom middle of the van you will see it starting to bend. Any faster and it would have bent right in the middle causing the whole van to colapse and uh destroy it self. Kinda like the chevy astro. People buy a Toyota.
That's not bend Kiro, that's change of perspective as the vehicle bounces back and the driver side of the van lifts to show the underside. The front door being pushed down may have confused you.
i didnt see it start to bend. are you sure you didnt see the exhaust coming down? have you seen the sienna crash test? when it rebounds back down the rear wheels go in to the passenger compartment, and the front wheels intrude on the foot wells. check out the 2008 chrysler minivan crash. now they are built like tanks! american for life.
i only buy honda's, i think spending more money on a car is worth the safety, and you honda's are very well made cars, ive never had one break-down on me. and ive only takin it to the shop for maintiance.
I don't have a car because I want to save money, ninja-dude. if I was to buy a car or van, it would be a Honda, you can kiss your Caravan all you want.
My parents actualy own a 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager (Thats the British version of the exact same car) and i hit a verge at 50mph avoiding a drunk driver and i must say it held up alot better than that..
Even the racks on top of the minivan flew off.
00crashtest 4 weeks ago
1) Front seat had worrying amount of travel.
2) Roof rails would hit other cars
3)The head would smash the driver side window as it actually was pushed outside the plane of the window opening.
hsgmsj 6 months ago
This is so a marginal rating (airbag fires late, crush zone is not as absorbant...)
KenjiroKitsumashi 7 months ago
...looks like your Thule would be screwed if you had one on there xD
TheGeek1028 8 months ago
My mom has this van...it has around 242k+ miles on it, it still runs. It runs terrible, but its still running somehow.
She really, really needs to get another car.
XxBakerxX72 8 months ago
i have to say my family was in a head on crash in a carvan when a pickup truck backed into the so good no airbags went off
homestead1897 1 year ago
drivers front airbag deploys too late.. On bigger speeds it simply won't have time to open
Salomanchik 1 year ago
@Salomanchik That's probably the only thing that stopped the dummy from snapping its neck on the steering wheel after flying through the air bag. xD
ineverrememberthese 7 months ago
I have a voyager that has 177k on it. Of course it had its tranny changed a few times.
Intelpentium54321 1 year ago
I hate minivans.
MSNIMSM 1 year ago
love how the roof racks just flew off...never did trust those
GrantLogan2 1 year ago
Well I know a guy with to Gm trucks both 97s and they have 260 thousand miles on them and they still run Great. I talked to this guy at my School, he owns a 1999 Jeep Cherokee and its has 297 thousand miles on it and it Sounded great and Ran Perfect, so that is Why im Buying myself a Jeep Cherokee soon i Hope.
WedidLandONtheMOON 1 year ago
shitty people mover get a camaro
hardcore4republican 2 years ago
My 2000 Grand caravan's transmission has far out lasted my uncle's second transmission in his Camry, all cars are great, it just depends on how you take care of them, if you never change the oil idc what car or campany it is, it's gonna fail, proper maintance is everything..
WWA1632 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
All American Car Like Suck Because They Dont Last As Long As Like Toyota's Honda's And Hyundia's
MatthewSullins86 2 years ago
that is the most fail comment i've ever heard. honda is credible, toyotas are shitty hyundai's are even worse. i've had a ride in both, trust me
XileOfTheStickman 2 years ago
Toyotas are ok now whats wrong with hyundia's i drive a 02 santa Fe
MatthewSullins86 2 years ago
u should see the crash test
glassycreekglassy 2 years ago
I'm not a fan of toyota anymore either. There were complaints on Power Steering in the newest generation of Corolla, Gas Pedal which is very common, and their brakes just started to fail up a bit. And their cars get more boring and boring. I'm also not a fan of Chrysler (makes Dodge and Jeep). GM (Chevrolet and GMC) and Ford are the vehicles I really want to buy.
frumpytuin 1 year ago
Your forgot mazda cocksucker, fords have been world reknowned for their reliability and longevity.
sparks12001 2 years ago
prove it
michaelpack1988 2 years ago
U Prove It
MatthewSullins86 2 years ago
I have a taurus with 500,000 miles on it, with all documentation. No rebuilds on engine or tranny.
And sorry put if a car has a bad engine then rebuild it and its fixed and take care of it. Its not really hard to do. Most people are just either poor or lazy or both. I'm just saying that most cars are built to a standard other wise the company wouldn't last as long. I also have a K-car that is 25 years old and I drive it every day. Its American and it lasted. there's the prove
michaelpack1988 2 years ago
I have Dodge trucks with over 600K, Ford is lucky to do that! GM and Dodge are part of the million mile club, Ford is junk and is not.
MPLSTORM 1 year ago 2
@MPLSTORM Ford isn't bad, just the people who drive them are. people just arnt responsible.
michaelpack1988 1 year ago
@MPLSTORM Like any other brand of car if you take car of it...it will last. Ford is good just people who own them arent.
MSNIMSM 1 year ago
lol i wish that was my moms car ;)
RulerOFmany 2 years ago
Glad my dad drives one, it used to be my moms, but now its his, its got 165k miles on it, now i fell safe with him in it, not his old deathtrap Geo Tracker.
One3teen 2 years ago
Oops feel*
One3teen 2 years ago
Comment removed
MPLSTORM 3 years ago 10
The vauxhall/opel sintra only got a 2 star EURONCAP rating.The Sintra was overwhelmed on impact the steering wheel broke off its column and the driver faced a threat of fatal neck injury because his head was forced back and upwards. Opel has says it has now taken steps from it from snapping off. The car was awarded three stars, but the final star has been struck through to indicate NCAP's fears over fatal injury. Opel has announced that the Sintra is being withdrawn from sale
smashedupcar 3 years ago
it got poor rating
Wiishit23456withvids 3 years ago
My crash into a stationary object in this very model was at 70MPH into a car at a stop light. Falling alseep at the wheel is easier than you think. Also, seatbelts save lives. Always wear one.
Master0Shake 3 years ago 15
we know
smashedupcar 3 years ago
lol
dieselblue1 3 years ago
I find it quite amusing that the roof rails flew off.
Pressbutan 3 years ago 24
dude thats funny shit i never expected someone to say that. i give u thumbs up for that
jtreign9097 3 years ago
Yes, Sir what is your problem All there are the same F@#%* shit take a a look in my vid my old 2002 Chrysler another shit like my 1998 Montana.................and F@#$%* all
mytujuan 3 years ago
because of a fuel leak the 2001 caravan scored poor
spookypensreturns 3 years ago
Dude, please fuck up with this arguing.
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
sorry i know this is annoying so i am not even going 2 be in this
ajlopez12 3 years ago
I do have a life u racis asshole.u get a fucking u stupid fuck
ajlopez12 3 years ago
and u can go suck ur moms dick while licking ur dads pussy u stupid cocksucker
ajlopez12 3 years ago
dude fuck u you stupid fucking racis fuck and fuck u u probably fuck ur ands pussy and suck ur moms dick
ajlopez12 3 years ago
How about you learn to spell?
blade7190 3 years ago
how about u get a life runescape nerd
ajlopez12 3 years ago
thats sad for a living u probably eat cat shit cause ur a stupid fuck and sont have a fucking life
ajlopez12 3 years ago
Dudes, please fuck up with this arguing.
alexkvaskov 3 years ago 4
srry for the triple post, internet messed up...
hummer1359699 3 years ago
ok, chryslerminivans1111... you are dumb! Chrysler is shit and GM or "GENERAL" Motors as normal english writing people spell it; rules... no doubts about it
hummer1359699 3 years ago
ok, chryslerminivans1111... you are dumb! Chrysler is shit and GM or "GENERAL" Motors as normal english writing people spell it; rules... no doubts about it
hummer1359699 3 years ago
ok, chryslerminivans1111... you are dumb! Chrysler is shit and GM or "GENERAL" Motors as normal english writing people spell it; rules... no doubts about it
hummer1359699 3 years ago
ok you admit it they updated the name but not the desighn ha and so since i proved you wrong you try to bring up whos companys in worse shape proved you wrong there too. man you are hitting duds arnt you
oldsmobiletw 3 years ago
also that v6 chryslwer has has a damn timming belt not even equipped with a chain, so cheap no vvt nothing it blows. i changed a water pump on the 3.5 before you have to take the timming cover off its horrible. and the valve cover are stamped steel just like the 3.3 and the 3.8 cheap
oldsmobiletw 3 years ago
yes but its dohc Not push rod ohv but if thats the case 3.6L it produces 275 hp (205 kW)and has been certified by the SAE to produce 302 hp what about those apples
oldsmobiletw 3 years ago
ok also the 3.1 started off as the 2.8 in the 80's and then grew from there now its up to the 3.5 displacement look at the impala and other gm vans and cars with the 3.5 its still the same engine. also pound for pound The 3.3L chrysler v6 vs 3.5l v6 the gm is less powerful. simply sad
oldsmobiletw 3 years ago
mabey compare apples to apples.
the Chrysler 3.5 is more powerful than generic motors 3.5!!!!!
the 3.4 04+ is made in CHINA!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
It was produced from 1989 through the present and was commonly paired with the Chrysler 3.3 engine in transverse engined cars. The Ultradrive and its descendants are produced at Kokomo Transmission in Kokomo, Indiana.
oldsmobiletw 3 years ago
89-91, updated named 41TE...
and i know where Kokomo is.
im not dumb.
hmmm, generic motors has how many assembly plants closed now? hmm, the H2 plant in Mishawaka is CLOSED!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
Hmmm Google chrysler 3.3L oil problems
and there is a federal investigation in to the ultradrive
oldsmobiletw 3 years ago
hmm, the google search of 3.3L oil problems fruited no results for me. nothing that proved anything.
and the ultradrive is an 88-91. sorry.
and i also googled this:
federal investigation into the ultradrive
and all it had was articles about a local ortopedics company Biomet.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
and if there were problems with the 3.3 3.8 Chrysler v6's would they still be used? hmm.
sorry but the gm 3.1 3.4(american) are no more. the 3.4 was "redesigned" and built in China.
sorry.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
sorry.
2004 and up the 3.4 is Chineese made!
it is imported to the US for use in the Torrquinox and Rendvouz and the 04 and 05 Venture.
hmm.
when genericmotorsminivans9968 stoops to insults, that means I WON!
i just used your words against you. you dumbass!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
wtf no there not! how stupid can you be
oldsmobiletw 3 years ago
what the fuck,
YES THEY ARE!!!!
google gm 3.4 chinese engines
you will see that they are exported from China to Canada.
Its built by GM's joint venture with Shanghai Automotive industry Corp
haha.
you dont know shit.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
me a sick bastard.
you are the one who is saying unsafe minivans are safe.
do you know how many people have died because generic motors was to lazy and cheap to design it safe???!?!?
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
there is no way that chrysler vans are reliable there not. There powertrains are iron block iron head pushrod engines that have horrible issues with oil consumsion and dont even get me started about transmissions.
oldsmobiletw 3 years ago
what? oil usage in a Chrysler iron block v6? are you high?!?! and bad transmissions? yea right.
when pigs fly!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
Ok 34 is made in lansing mich chrysler had no role in the atomic bomb no auto company did you obviosly dont know shit.
oldsmobiletw 3 years ago
actually yes they did.
you even backed me up when i used my chknbro username.
you must be gmminivans9968's gay lover.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
the 3.4 from 2004-today IS built in China.
it is used in the Chevy Equinox and Pontiac Torrent.
the 3.4 suffers from premature intake gasket failure and premature head gasket failure. also very bad piston slap.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
its the LNJ engine.
CHINEESE JUNK!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
3.4 is made in China.
Chrysler played an important roll in the Atomic bomb and other things in WW2.
no wonder you like generic motors... your dumb as hell.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
3.4 in the Equinox are made in China.
the 6spd auto in EVERY GM vehicle is a Ford/GM
and the Opel Sintras used Opel engines from EUROPE!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
the 97-04 have got an overall of 4stars... BUT they were rated POOR because there was LITTLE survival space. and the forces on the foot caused it to break off. the steering coloum didnt colapse in.
and if these mythical changes were made in 2001 then they wouldve been retested, but the only changes in 2001 was a refreshed grille. the 2004 models were the same damn thing as the 1997 models. CHEAP AND UNSAFE AS HELL!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
Hey Chryslerminivans1111 and GMminivans9968 you guys need to get a fuckin life. I mean fighting over minivans, who the hell are you guys fucking soccer moms? And besides Honda and Toyotas minivans are far safer than any of the shit boxes from GM Chrysler and even Ford. If you guys wanna stop being little soccer mom bitches who wine about vans all day then go fight over trucks. Trust me its way more fun.
FordrangerMan698 3 years ago
Chrysler minivans have ALWAYS been safer.
They have been 4 and 5 star rated for YEARS!
They are just as reliable as Honda and Toyota. the Chryslers are way more innovative too!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
bunch of fags fighting over minivans lol
StrokedGT 3 years ago
Amen, man!
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
the 97-04 gm minivans got 0stars.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
3.4 in the Equinox are made in China.
The 6spd auto in EVERY GM is a Ford/GM.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
a sob? are you bringin my momma into this? you better not...
unless you wanna be hurtin.
and yes any gmminivan has a resale of 2,000$-5,000$ less than a compariable chrysler.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
HAHAHAHA Watch the roof racks on this shit box.....
1990CaddyBrougham 3 years ago
um that is NOT the roof rack. its the cross bars. the roof rack is screwed into the sheet metal. and anyway the Chrysler minivans have ALWAYS been safer than the gm shitboxes and them ford pos!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
Chill guys, its a minivan.... lol....
But,
Hey atleast GM will still be around in a few years....
1990CaddyBrougham 3 years ago
um Chrysler will always be around. GM just lost 39BILLION dollars. THE MOST OF ANY COMPAY EVER! they wont be around much longer. and i will laugh my ass off when they file for bankrupcy!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
gm minivans have a resale value anywhere from $2,000 to $5,500 lower than a compariable Chrysler in the same condition. and ford minivans have an average of $1,500 less resale value than a Chrysler.
go to Kelly Blue Book and try it.
and if you say "fuck kbb" or "screw kbb" or anything of that nature... then i proved you wrong!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
european test are identical to the american test. 40mph and every thing. but the LHD scored less than the RHD! it is like that on most vehicles. and the 97-04 gm minivans got 0stars in the ncap test! haha!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
the 3.4 is made in china. the 3.4 in the Equinox and Torrent and later Renzdvous are made in China. google GM chinese 3.4 v6. Read all about it.
Chrysler helped build the Atomic bomb too!!!! bet you didnt know that! did ya? NOPE! and Chrysler is good.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
yes i do.
they 3.4 is made in china.
3.1 3.4 3.5 3.8 3.9 all have intake flaws that pour coolant in and destroys the engine. and the above engines are soo poor designed that they have piston slap!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
Voyager? thats the Eouropean LHD model.
The 2001-2007 Chrysler got 5stars in RHD. and 3 in LHD. sorry.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
um your gay.
who would want a v-8 minivan?
and spinners?
chrysler minivans hold there resale value better than ford and gm knock offs.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
um your gay.
who would want a v-8 minivan?
and spinners?
chrysler minivans hold there resale value better than ford and gm knock offs.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
while using my chknbro username i proved it to you that gm minivans dont hold there resale value!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
while using my chknbro username i proved it to you that gm minivans dont hold there resale value!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
no... a 1984 Voyager/Caravan cost around 1,000 dollars in very poor condition.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
gm minivans arent the safest.
they arent innovtive
they dont keep there resale value as good as a Chrysler/Honda/Toyota.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
yes they do.
like there 2.8 3.1 3.4 3.5 3.8 3.9 engines suck. along with the trannies that back them.
and the hydramatic 350 sucked too!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
its $1,200. not $2,000. at the most it only cost 1,500.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
and the GM engine and trannys dont suck?
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
the dodge grand caravan/ chrysler town and country have the lowest mantinence cost of minivans recorded by car and driver! haha.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
um. a $2,000 chrysler minivan? is it a 1984? i guess so. Chrysler minivans have higher resale value than gm minivans.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
Crysler minivans off the dealership are worth $100.00 right after u drive off the lot!
unlike GM
ads13131 3 years ago
um.
you must be retarded to think that what you said is true. CHrysler minivans hold there resale value better than shitty chevy minivans!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
Everyone who likes Chrysler minivans can kiss my ass!
ads13131 3 years ago
mark the acre. and your a gm minivan fuck-off arent you?
i like minivans that are reliable, safe, and keep there resale value.CHRYSLER!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
sorry. there were no changes to the gm u-body in 2001. they were all the same from 1997-2005.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
but they arent cheap and flexiable. gm minivans are just junk.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
Again GM RULES!
ads13131 4 years ago
Your gay.
This is why 1994-2008 Chrysler minivan is SAFE while the 1997-2005 gm minivans kill people everyday.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
Dodge cars are safe but their transmissions are horrifying..
calvinyuenblinke 4 years ago
what tranny are you talkin about? some 15 year old A604 with 150,000 miles?
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
Nope, 7 year old Dodge Caravan Top-of-the-Line.
calvinyuenblinke 3 years ago
if you are gonna say anything sucks. provide us with more info. what are the miles... has the vehicle been abused? most ofter the van has 140,000 miles. been abused. (it cant be abused if a 70 year old woman drives it all the time and is the only driver). so it prolly does have 140k miles and abused too!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
um, my parent's drive it? It has never been abused. I don't know, but the car was sold for $2200 and to fix the transmission would cost $2000.
calvinyuenblinke 3 years ago
my parents drive theres. and 2000$ to fix? its only 1200$. and how do you know its never been abused? are you with them everytime they drive it? when sombody borrows it? didnt think so!
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
No one has borrowed it except my aunt and uncle and they wouldn't abuse anything. Ya it costs $2000 to fix...
calvinyuenblinke 3 years ago
it only cost $1200... $1500 at the most.
and if the van had around 130,000miles than the tranny was gonna go out. auto trannies go out (or need work) around 130,000 miles.
chryslerminivans1111 3 years ago
$2000 said the fucking dude okay?
calvinyuenblinke 3 years ago
I'm not here saying dodge rules or anything but when it came to safety, gas mileage and general options on a minivan, the caravan pretty much falls into that category, of course Honda and Toyota are superior in durability and longevity. Not all of us can spend that much on a vehicle. The Caravans fits the tight budget families.
pocnhut 4 years ago
When u buy a minivan I hope that most buyers intentions are that I need t a vehicle to keep my family safe in getting then from point A to point B. How can u even make a remark in saying GM minivans rule when it's plain and simple that the children in the back seat would see their parents being crushed in an accident?
pocnhut 4 years ago
You might want to watch that again, the middle Cross members rails are what flew off the roof rail assembly, the part that's bolted to the roof did not come off. Then again I own one so I know what they look like.
pocnhut 4 years ago
you have to resort to childish name calling? wow. how old are you? two?
chknbro 4 years ago
again gm is known for unreliable minivans. this proves my point exactly. and you just have to say somthin cocky to everybody who hates them. your so cocky, thats what you like to eat.
chknbro 4 years ago
hey man GM is ok, but chrysler is better, they really are! so if you have such a thing for gm, why don't you f*ckin go work for the company and correct every mistake they make. i own a 2002 caravan, and my wife drives a 2003 montana, the montana has been giving us nothing but problems, all we had have to for the chrysler is put gas in it and go, but the gm is unreliable, but it is safe.
saskmatt7 4 years ago
gm just sucks. face it. and leave chknbro alone!
browens1534 4 years ago
your just spamming now. that is safer than 1997-2004 GM vans! Chrysler is way the hell better than GM in every possiable way!
chknbro 4 years ago
Not just the xhaust look very closly at the bottom middle its bending. IF this was a 50 Mph or 55 crash it would have caved the middle
KiroTheGreat 4 years ago
no sir thats bend watch it more times.
KiroTheGreat 4 years ago
its the exhaust. watch again.
chknbro 4 years ago
wow if you look at the bottom middle of the van you will see it starting to bend. Any faster and it would have bent right in the middle causing the whole van to colapse and uh destroy it self. Kinda like the chevy astro. People buy a Toyota.
KiroTheGreat 4 years ago
That's not bend Kiro, that's change of perspective as the vehicle bounces back and the driver side of the van lifts to show the underside. The front door being pushed down may have confused you.
wazatna 4 years ago
i didnt see it start to bend. are you sure you didnt see the exhaust coming down? have you seen the sienna crash test? when it rebounds back down the rear wheels go in to the passenger compartment, and the front wheels intrude on the foot wells. check out the 2008 chrysler minivan crash. now they are built like tanks! american for life.
chknbro 4 years ago
This is the OFFSET Crash test, its MUCH more severe than the old test on the older caravans
kevintomb 4 years ago
i only buy honda's, i think spending more money on a car is worth the safety, and you honda's are very well made cars, ive never had one break-down on me. and ive only takin it to the shop for maintiance.
calebcaveman 4 years ago
any car will be reliable if you take care of it. but only the toughest cars can survive the offset crash.
jtreign9097 4 years ago 2
Umm have you guys even looked at the Windstar, Freestar and Montana crash test????
Caravan did the best :) cause there the leader in Minivans.
The Caravan is built in Windsor, Ontario and St. Louis, Missouri.
pocnhut 4 years ago
i dont understand how this is accurate. first off, the roof bars flew off, when they should be locked on and how did the gas door open?
mikedefusco54 4 years ago
its hitting concrete at 50 mph.. the roof rack is screwed into sheet metal with little 3/16" screws .. hmmmmmm wonder why
toolinmaine 4 years ago
It seems to me that the design from before 2001 was more rigid.
Klutech 4 years ago
wow it makes me not want our van that we have now because it's the same as that &:)
lightningbladeninja4 4 years ago
My bad, I looked at the ratings, it sucks
alexkvaskov 4 years ago
yeah rite your car probably sucks more
lightningbladeninja4 4 years ago
I don't have a car because I want to save money, ninja-dude. if I was to buy a car or van, it would be a Honda, you can kiss your Caravan all you want.
alexkvaskov 4 years ago
Hondas are expensive, and the service is terrible. They won't let your car out of the shop under $1,000.
iamastupidperson 4 years ago
My parents actualy own a 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager (Thats the British version of the exact same car) and i hit a verge at 50mph avoiding a drunk driver and i must say it held up alot better than that..
murpet1988 4 years ago
it looked like the head went through the air bag and hit the wheel
Turbo856 4 years ago
it rocked
chase74521601 4 years ago
the hand was crushed after that crash test, have you seen the crash test of the same car but in rear? lol it sucks the gasoline ran out
Turbo856 4 years ago
In right hand drive it scored 2/5 stars.
BuickEnclave 4 years ago 2
The airbag deployed a bit too late. But overall, it performed well.
alexkvaskov 4 years ago
Good thing nothing was attached to the roof rack!
lilspark3000 4 years ago
yeah... and the roof rack got as smashed as the van did!! =)
sweetdudeawesome 4 years ago
it did pretty good
lampdug 4 years ago