Added: 1 month ago
From: machinima
Views: 80,120
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (829)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • el shito gamo

  • this is one of the shitest strategy games i have ever played

  • @adairobrian That's your opinion, most people liked it.

  • can any1 tell me what music is that from?

  • I really love this game, amount of vehicles, size, factions and voiceover is fantastic. It's not easy game though, very fast paced, you need to be very aggresive for enemy or they will outflank and outnumber you. Can't wait to unlock my fav BM 21 Grad and MLRS :D.

  • Damn, I wish I had a good PC.

  • immmmmmmmmm so going to get this

  • this seems to be a mix between world in conflict [on a larger scale] and close combat [one of the best rts games of all time]

  • FUCKING AMAZING IM GETTING THIS

    

  • How do you pull up the 3D deck feature thats in the multiplayer trailer? I know how to pull up my deck but not the 3D one.

  • 2:55

    Game over . . .

  • Is this game good? Because im thinking to buy it...

  • the sounds from tanks , the explosin Not realistic at all, its sounds like my computer stuck.

    good game is a game that take care of graphics sounds and gameplay.

  • It looked cool until NATO started winning xD

  • "never before seen realism" apparently they haven't heard of World in Conflict, came out in 2006, has better graphics..lol

  • @lonespartan31289 because graphics mean everything hurr durr

  • @lonespartan31289 realism doesn't mean graphics WiC is much gamier than this

  • @greencurrycamo i know what your saying, but it also had realistic physics and the fact that armor on the front of a tank was more then sides etc. etc. it was plenty realistic. i haven't played this yet so i cant say what it has better, but from the trailer its claims cant be shown/proven/defended and theres no reason it shouldn't look at least as good as a game that came out 6 years ago with a low budget.

  • @lonespartan31289 I have the game I like it and I think that if you like WiC you will like it. The maps are much larger than in WiC and it has a different feel.  There is a reason that this game is going for $40. I didn't realize how good WiC's graphics are had to look at them again they are pretty damn impressive.

  • @greencurrycamo haha indeed they are, way ahead of their time. And i will definitely check this game out when i have time, a good game doesnt need amazing graphics to be awesome, and i do feel that this game would be fun to play.

  • this is probaly going to be the best realse of games (for me) in 2012 this is absolutely crazy espically because it was made with INGAME FOOTAGE? I MEAN FUCKING SUPER GRAPHICS EPICAL FIGHTS CRAZY ASSED UNITS? I MEAN WHAT MORE CAN THEY GIVE US? WTF OMG BEST GAME I HAVE EVER SEEN!

  • Now THIS is how you make a trailer.

  • best game ever !!!! i like :)

  • I've started watching video...nothing...nothing....f­irst strike...GRIN

  • Comment removed

  • I need a theme song

  • Song at 0.11?

  • It's a copy of World in Conflict

  • @st4r0y3 no.

    

  • @st4r0y3 Not quite, the game plays quite differently from WiC. You'll understand the moment you play it.

  • Comment removed

  • And this is a game which got "extreme realism" ?? WTF?

    Look at 1:10 , that has nothing to do with realism, omg.

  • @CptPappkamerad Not every battle has to be fought in massive, open landscapes. If there was a war in modern-day Germany, that would probably be a good tactic to use.

  • @thekillerhornet25 So you wanna tell me that it would be a good tactic to fire with 100 infantry-men and assault rifles on an armored convoi? Doesn´t make sense for me...

  • @CptPappkamerad

    Many armored personal carriers dont have a very though armor, so close range fire with basic fierarms can damage some. Those APC are french VAB, and they are only protected from bullets at the front to retain optiml speed and som amphibious capability. Besides they had unloaded their infatry

  • No action, talk only.

  • Very cool game!

  • At first I thought Hm, this must be some kind of vehicular combat game.

    Then, it said Real-Time Strategy.

    ..

    0:59 to 2:10 - I jizzed.

  • i did not know tanks can go that fast

  • @kane001 You've played too much CoD, all those shitty FPS games have a habit of making the vehicles slow as a motherfucker.

  • I bought it through Steam and I can't even get it to start up.. I'm fucking furious right now. Anyone know how to fix it?

  • @lilJayer What are you doing here then? Go to the steam forums you fucking douche.

  • @BloXboX37 Harsh, and I did there were no fixes

  • @L0ST1231 sorry if i was mean or not making sense. I thought this was a different video that i commented on :P

  • wait nvm but i already bought it

    

  • @TheCheckerdboy777 Okay...I was gonna say, why the hell did you ask if you should buy it if you already did. :)

  • @L0ST1231 whats the point I already bought it before i posted that comment...

    

  • @LivingLifeless9 Trust me, that is just in the trailer. Noobs might do that but most stick the infantry in the woods. A couple HE rounds or an auto cannon would have wiped out those troops in the game before they get to do anything significant.

  • @yrba1 It is slower paced like company of heroes and each unit is valuable. One SAM missile can take out a helicopter full of infantry. One tank shell can take out a tank if hit from the side (depends on the tank). Infantry die easily in the open. I love company of heroes and I love this game.

  • @ludlamer Just the trailer, the game is slow paced compared to most RTS games. But you have all your units on the map right from the start which is nice. Heavy tank battles end up begin slug fests unless one person flanks the other or missiles are used to crack the heavy armor. watch a gameplay video for a better idea.

  • Comment removed

  • SHOULD I GET THIS GAME LIKE IS IT WORTH MY $40?!?!?! I really need to know

  • @TheCheckerdboy777 Get the beta first.

  • pause at 1:58 and it looks like a super epic screenshot that should be the game boxes cover or back and what song is this its fucking awsome?

  • warsaw anti air team againts NATO. When poland is part of nato -_- . Please correct me if its just a weapon name or if im wrong =]

  • the NATO convoy way used to draw the main enemy force out so that the lepoard and apaches can roll in and eliminate them then the apaches were used to draw out the anti air team for the long range supports to take them out. war is a game and soldiers are mere pawns

  • I don't know the weapons WW3 will be fought with, but WW4 will be fought with sticks and stones

  • @GhostSoldierful didnt albert einstein say that

  • World in conflict much?

  • @dariansarr Not at all. This game is COMPLETELY different.

  • I'm more interested in the song than in the game.

  • Is this a good and fun game?

  • When the 4 nato leos shoot it looks like how tanks shoot in RUSE.

  • awesome 

  • If you see 4 Leopard 2's coming at you, shoot yourself couse it aint worth the trouble

  • woah

  • @thenoobfactor ARMA is used the the military of USA, Uk , Austuralia for certain types of training.

  • @FunnyVideoCollector 3rd will hopefully be more realistic..

  • Anyone know the song at 0:11?

  • @Boombox142 it is their music theme.... it was made for the game...

  • @Boombox142 I second that notion!

  • @Boombox142 1111111111sounds like something from c & c generals...

  • T72 why you bad like in gulf war :c

  • I play Arma 2

    Wargame is a lot like it they have tried to make the weapons and vehicals like the real thing it feels very serious and simulator like just like DCS and ARM 2 does.

  • @FunnyVideoCollector Arma 2 isn't really that realistic, and cant be called a simulator. It only seems that way when compared to Bf3 or COD.

  • I wonder how this games matches up to Arma 2 / 3? Anyone?

  • @Boudabang Its a completely different genre and setting, so comparison is almost impossible.

  • @Boudabang dude, youre asking to compare a shooter with an RTS, theres no comparison, and ive been playing the beta for a few days, its mind-blowing good

  • RIP beta

    It was fun but I'm playing the full version after the server is back up in a few hours :)

  • This reminds me alot of World in Conflict. I'll probabaly get it.

  • @CallsignGooser Same developers ;) 

  • Is this like World in Conflict?

  • ROFL The red infantry were using rollers skates or something in their bayonet charge ?

  • This game is peace of shit

  • i hope there will be a nuke

  • Why is Poland one of the 8 nations to be? Even Luxenburg have a larger army then them...

  • 1:12 Really? Seriously? That has got to be one of the worst strategy's ever. Friendly fire not a concern? A single Apache or Thunderbolt should take out a convoy. You don't send infantry at APC's. Wtf.

  • does anyone know the name of the song ?

  • Its like World in conflict made sweet love to Theater of war 2.

  • Shit.

  • If you ever see 4 Apache helicopters one day, run, just run...

  • @conradkvideos and You'll Only Die Tired :D

  • @conradkvideos fuck man i used to live by NAS Pensacola and it always seemed like WWIII had started

  • @conradkvideos Don't Run. You Only Die Tired ...

  • @conradkvideos Don't bother to run, u only die tired :)

  • @conradkvideos HA why run your probably already dead

  • Shitty World in Conflict?

  • It's like ARMA 2 but played from above. They took RUSE and turned it into a war simulator. I get good performance on a GTX 260 i7 3.4Ghz. It only uses up 800Mb of ram.

  • @FunnyVideoCollector This boggles my mind. When I looked at the memory requirements I couldn't believe it.

  • Is this just like World in Conflict?

  • @malinko35 It's a cross between world in conflict and ruse. It may look bad in the trailer but some of the beta matches are actually fantastic.

  • I hate everything to do with the ambush part of the trailer. I SERIOUSLY hope this is not what the game is like otherwise I will not be purchasing this 'realistic' game.

  • @asdfq43a56fds Don't worry, from what I've seen of the BETA, that's just for cinematic show.

  • I think its as good as RUSE

  • song name ?

    

  • Why do they always show that Nato always wins? :/

  • @Protorg

    because a lot of US players wouldn't buy the game if trailers didn't show nato winning. US market is the biggest for video game afaik.

    Don't worry though, Varsaw pact is pretty able to win

  • cmon trhis game sicks compared to strategy games that already excist.

    every total war game is better (most of them have better graphix to)

    another example: RUSE, exactely this only better graphics and (for what I have seen) better gameplay, more realistic.

  • Comment removed

  • I recently played the beta for about 10 hours. This game lives up how bad ass it looks. This is the game I have always want to play but never had. It exceeds the epiciness of Total Annihilation battles. It exceeds the detail of Company of Heroes or Men at War. And it is clear that winning has more to do with strategy and tactics on the battlefield compared to StarCraft and Command and Conquer. No base building, you just focus on holding ground and killing enemy units.

  • @JohnBear08 Any fighter aircraft?  Bombers?

  • @jshabadoo

    no, no planes in the game. They'd be too OP because of how fast they are. Or they'd be a very random unit costing a ton and that would mean GG if you lost it.

    Besides they cant resupply at FOBs

  • @JohnBear08

    Earned a like for the TA comparison.

    Didn't think anything can ever stand up to it, but we'll see.

  • @JohnBear08

    You just sold it to me, especially since you mentioned its better then men of war, it looks just brilliant!

  • @ScarsOfTheCrucifix Men of War is a great game and i will still be playing it but it is not nearly as epic in scale. Sadly in Wargame you can't take direct control of units. On the other hand, Wargame simplified inventories so that a supply truck does all the thinking for you. The things that make this game better is the modern theme, the accessibility, air units, and the pace of the game.

  • @JohnBear08

    You should see World in conflict then my friend, you clearly have missed the game of your life.

    this one is nothing compared to World in Conflict.

  • @TheLandazar Wargame and WiC are both amazing, in my opinion

  • @TheLandazar

    WiC had nearly identical units for both side, and much less troop choice

  • @Kamfrenchie I second that. I enjoyed WiC but each units type did seem a bit hokie. Don't get me wrong, at the time WiC was one of my favorite game and still is.

  • @TheLandazar You are right that the explosions in WiC were amazing. But who drops nukes to take out 5 tanks. Also I love the concept of WiC but I always felt that the units felt toy like since they took damage like a unit out of Command and Conquer. The 'special effects' in WiC but visually, the unit models and the landscape feel more real. Lastly WiC did not have morale which is always an important part of warfare.

  • @JohnBear08 even total war?

  • @419chris419 The total war series is great but they have not done the modern warfare yet. The maps in Wargame are much larger so you can more easily launch ambushes if the enemy is not using scouts. Modern hardware always for more options. Helos can fly low beside tree like and sneak up on enemy artillery. In terms of realism, I would say it is on par with the total war series (however, your cannons never get stuck in the mud).

  • @419chris419 I also wanted to say that in total war games, you typically have 1 large army facing off at one key moment, where as this game allows for several smaller battles. In total war, you might have some Calvary off fighting somewhere but you usually still have one large force that meets and that does not retreat, unless you loose moral. So wargame always for a series of battles where each opponent is trying to find the weakness of the other player.

  • R.U.S.E.: Modern warfare :))

  • you kids are being too critical

  • this reminds me much of World in Conflict...only worse?

  • Guys, it's just a cinematic trailer. Watch some actual gameplay before you judge!

  • sorta reminds me of world in conflict mixed with supreme commander 1, remember the 1!

  • @gmk120 that's what I am thinkin too lol. Only WiC was made 5 years ago and had better graphics O_o lol. Details though, minot details.

  • im gettin' it because for me this is like World In Conflict 2

  • Anyone knows the name of this music?

  • FINALY a modern based rts game

  • @bombizzen it's a video game not history.

  • Please tell me the name of the song in the video!

  • I like how the trailer dosent say one fucking thing about the game... well beside the relase date

  • @Marrino460 It's a really fun game. Im playing the beta alot its pretty addicting. look for it on steam.

  • Anyone know the name of the song at the beginning?

  • I like how the infantry ran as fast as the nato convoy

  • 40 bucks for this?

  • I would really like the music used in this trailer

  • Song name?? Anyone?

  • where did this game come from?

  • I just wanna know if this game is good.

  • "This video was created using in-game footage."

    No, unlike bf3, this game does NOT have that level of graphics that it would've been necessary to say that.

  • How crappy is this? guess Pegi3 ??

  • @adonisza1996 Yes, pegi is similar to metacritic which shows how good the game is.

    People are so stupid...

  • 0:13 and 1:00 Song name?plz

  • this is like a crappy version of world in conflict

  • @trainsman22 It is actually much, much better

  • @trainsman22 And how do you know its crappy?

  • Thats the stupidest shit I've ever seen.

    Is this meant to be realistic?

  • @asdfq43a56fds

    Just because you have the possibility doesn't mean it's not realistic, this video is hardly representative of what the game will be. Look at some gameplay videos.

  • @asdfq43a56fds STFU and GTFO if you dont like it :P

  • 1:00 song??

  • Comment removed

  • Stupid NATO!!! CCCP WIN!!

  • I'm getting this

  • Comment removed

  • @Bombizzen it was a bunch of APCs, and they had tanks. how much support do you really think they needed up close?

  • @Bombizzen It gets better, What warsaw pact commander designed the "Lets attack the convoy from both sides and create a cross fire so we can shoot our own guys too." Strategy?

  • @Bombizzen Maybe it's satire :3

  • @LLPTV

    Of course, it's a well known fact that no Warsaw Pact soldiers were issued helmets, and that their speciality was hiding in open fields and waiting for NATO convoys to drive by.

    It's also quite convenient for the trailer how they wait for the other side to send something in before they counter it with something else, rather than just bring AA with them and prevent the pointless deaths of several good men of the special beret division.

    But oh well, it might be a decent game.

  • @Bombizzen I counted six tanks. Against a couple Humvees that's a hell of a lot of support. Also, that infantry was probably spec ops, which explains the berets. (even though I can see regular infantry wearing berets.)

  • @TheDudeFromPoland

    Yeah, I reacted a bit too harshly. It's just that the steam description clai