George is a voice of sanity in an insane world. When Bush trumped up charges against Iraq, I fiercely defended him, and our actions. Ppl from other countries maintained it was oil, and only oil. Hell hath no fury like a nation disgraced by a greedy leader. We are seeing it bold face and ugly, and the markets and banks are their butt buddies. How do we have the money to go into one conflict after another? We profit off misery..simple.
Looks like George is mad because he lost his benefactors. First Saddam and now Gadaffi .Never mind George there will be other mad dictators squandering their citizens wealth by donating to you , sorry your 'charities ' .
By the way your are an ELECTED MP who can ( hoepfully ) lose his seat next time around IF the people chose,.The LIbyans NEVER chose . Give them a chance for Christs sake , sorry , make that Muhamad . !
@whatahellofashout sorry about that , your right , the electorate decided to kick the fool out , probably his bizarre appearance on BB didnt go down well with the voters in Brick Lane . What do I know , I ve only been to Libya about 40 times . Hahahaha
@whatahellofashout yep your right , sorry about that , seems the conservative , Muslim voters of Brick Lane had enough of gorgeous G, probably his truly bizarre appearance on BBrother didnt help . Sorry again , I was in Tripoli a lot over the last few years and missed all that . Ha Ha Ha or should I say Al Humdurillilah !
George Galloway is spot on with his assessment on LIBYA....AMERICAN,BRITISH,FRENCH company's putting pressure on their governments to protect their cartel. The Libyan 'rebels' were supplied armour by AMERICA to over-throw GADDAFI. What about SYRIA? The tyrants are killing their own people there..Why don't we go in there?Sorry nothing in it for us?
@mrgilles1990? What can we sell of next? not much left...N.H.S,COUNCIL SERVICES,MAIL SERVICE..Should be worth a few quid to the parasites.'Call me Dave' Cameron. 'WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER' HA HA HA HA HA..........
@mrgilles1990? If that's the case why hasn't deregulating the banks stopped the greedy sods from continuing to award themselves huge bonuses?You are mistaken the banks have not been re-nationalised.People have been conned.Welcome to Broken Britain. Remember the days when gas,electricity,telephone were all public services? What happened? We sold of the bloody lot and now we are seeing the consequences. Private utility company's playing with people lives.Old age pensioners freezing to death .
The reason New lie-bour kicked george galloway out of the party is because he put the rest of the charlatans to shame..Bow your head BLAIR.MANDELSON,STRAW,PRESTCOTT AND THE REST..To many to mention..
@mrgilles1990? Didn't the 'people' have to bail out these capitalist banks because they brought this country to it's knees?So going by your argument...either does capitalism.Under cameron's big con..erm..i mean big society..The richer will get richer and the poorer poorer..
@MegaTrainspotter No The governments chose to deregulate the banks and then bail them out.
The banks were treated like a public service, not a capitalist one if you think about it.
CameCON is not a capitalist or a conservative, he is a traitor career politician.
In my perfect world the Conservative party would be destroyed and a new radical pro-British capitalist party made in instead. The modern day conservative party is a EUphile corporatist party.
@MrGilles1990 that's why countries like Cuba/Libya have the same life expectance of a citizen in Washington right?! That's why people in Libya have BETTER living conditions under Kadaffi then under Cameron? Socialism is a gift but most be controlled properly by the government to avoid Russian Sovjet situations. Some countries actually DO have a working socialist system where the civilians benefit FAR more than capitalism
@MrGilles1990 that's where you have BADLY researched; Officially Cuba has a life expectance 6months longer then ppl in Washington! Libyans have the same life expectance... (Look it up if you don't believe me!) Cuban stats are available and so are Libyan! Right a capitalist economy would be devastating in those countries, the market price would be suffocating the locals, I am clearly not talking to an economist :)
@janjan55555 LOL i got my info of the united nations. Do you think Britian or the US are capitalist? And if you want to know what causes the most economic devastation, it's socialism, ask the Russians or the North Koreans. the top 5 List by the United Nations (2005-2010) are.. Japan Hong Kong Iceland Switzerland Australia Top 5 capitalist countries as well ;) nice try "If you're not a liberal when you're 20, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative when you're 40, you have no head".
@janjan55555 I don't follow the Bolshevik broadcasting corporation, that does not make me a socialist.
I make my own opinion on things, especially when it comes to war, because the Mainstream Media has a habit of being the propaganda tool of the liblabcon.
@MrGilles1990 IMPOSSIBLE!!! You made one big mistake is by adressing your source as being apart of a non existing group, you can't just say I don't use Mainstream as a reference nor offstream (or what you call Bolshebnik corp, evne though I am not even talking about RT -.- , there is more to offstream than RT btw!)
europe invaide libya to kill gaddafi for oil and property. gaddafi kill all the nato and rebal for heavyness of your dick. gaddafi has to stay in power becose he has big dick. long live gaddafi and his femily, and his regim.
Gadafi was talking about nationalizing oil, which is why Mossadegh was overthrown via Operation Ajax..
.
Unbeknown to most, the Libyan government had a public central bank, not a private one like the Federal Reserve or ECB. The Libyan dollar was backed by billions in gold and they had almost no debt.
.
Gadafi was also about to demand payment for oil in gold...
.
This is why the "rebels" established a new private central bank immediately and why all foreign oil contracts were renewed.
I have to say that allthought I agree with much of what Galloway says , I still am very suspicious of him. Many observers of Galloway claim he is used by the establishment to control dissent and is a willing agent of the establishment. Ask yourself this question . why has Galloway and the so called "anti war movement" keeping a low profile whilst British and American Impearlist are spreading the flames of war in Libya and Syria. Why no massive rally in London aganist NATO bombing of Libya.
If Zionist Impearlist American backed so called "Rebels" (who number less than 5000 seize power and NATO acting as their airforce,) it will be sad day for the Libyan people. Just like in Iraq when Zionist Impearlist invaders seized power and ousted Saddam Hussein , the killing will start in earnest. The Zionist Impearlist will insist that all remannts of the old Libyan Goverment are put to death, anyone who supported the legtimate Libyan Goverment will be murdred, along with the educated , p1
2 teachers, doctors , just about anyone with education or brains to organise to fight the Zionist American Impearlist takeover of Libyan soverigntry and theft of Libyas vast oil reserves. In Iraq Blackwater a private American army , paid for by the American taxpayers , and controlled by the CIA , carried out a systematic buthering of Acedemics, doctors , lawers , teachers etc in Iraq in what they called a clensing of anyone or group who could be able to organise a fightback to ocupation.
Just because no one is doing anything in other countries being oppressed doesnt mean no one should do anything about Libya. If you can start with one its always a help and even if its about Oil, as long as the dictator is out the region will be better off because non of you chatting against this campaign know anything about gaddafi and what hes done and he would do. Plus even if there was NATO sell to the council weapons and you'll see that gaddafi will be gone in no time.
@Thetruthisone We all taught that the demise of Dictator Saddam would bring PEACE and enlightenment, and look how that ended .... UK+USA were failing /are failing horribly at this very moment. Plz do u even know why 3 million out of 5.5million Libyans are still DIE hard supporting Kaddafi?! DO u know why?! Not because they are die hard fans of him, they don't want their country to degrade into nothingness as in Iraq! And that's a big argument itself, Libya was NOT entirely revolting....
@Thetruthisone revolting against KAddafi, you still had a majority(and still have) that supports Kaddafi unlike Egypte and Tunesia where nearly 99% was against the current government system and it was clear that both of the Presidents had to go! I am not convinced Libya is the same analogue situation. It's rather East vs WestLibya (primarly ofcourse!) So my advise would be, GTFO Libya and save your tax money for your own nation, its for oil simple as that LOOK AT YEMEN (FAAAAR worse than Libya!)
@janjan5555 First you say Gaddafi has majority support unlike 99% of egyot and tunisia, which is nonesense and just shows you dont know and you dont follow the current situation in those countries. Then you say its east vs west in Libya, which is utter nonesense as well and shows you shouldnt be speaking about Libya because you seriously have no clue whats going on and whats been happening for 41 years. I dont even know where to begin with you you have such a massive gap in knowledge ahh forgt t
@Thetruthisone maybe I mistyped; Egypte +Tunesia actually did have a wooping 99% AGAINST Mubarak/ben Ali! I have visited Tripoli/Cairo/Tunes, big difference. Ppl dont sleep in the streets in Libya, Libya was FKING NOWHERE before Kaddafi, it now stands as having worlds biggest water infrastructural system, and that with a country dominated by desert! unlike Tunesia/Egypt, who have received BILLIONS of dollars of Western nations to tighten bands and did that help the civilians????? NO!!!!
@Thetruthisone Just u wait when USA/UK/FRANCE take over Libya; u will be wishing your country never had been asking for help from the west! Don't tell me I didn't warn u!! A situation like Iraq is near for your pathetic collaborating ass!! They are currently negotiating what will happen with Libya after Kaddafi; SCENARIO=> Steal oil , Kill Kaddafi publicly , Terrorism attacks will mass spawn on a daily base u can no longer walk normally in streets , innocents will be put in jails and get raped
@Thetruthisone U say Libya is different than Iraq? How is that different? Western nations trying ILLEGALLY to invade a country, thinking u can set democracy while the country hasn't seen democracy in over 100 years! It's perfectly analogue to Iraq; same wealth Uk/France is after(Over 100 BILLION pounds of investments from both countries!)while sitting helpless watch Yemen get crushed yb the dictatorial regime of Saleh! Hypocrisie at its best...
Mr Galloways' political policy is: Anything Downing street does is wrong and completely immoral and we will always find a way of criticising the government for anything it does or any policy it it legislates. Thats all you are Gallow , just someone who just loves criticising. You crit the arab leaders all the time so what were YOU prepared to do for the arab people to lift the injustice upon them? unfort the time came for change but you completely ignored it and you will be known for tht always
@Thetruthisone So Uk's foreign policy has been a succes?IS that what you are trying to say?!raq; no succes, Libya,;FAR FROM succes. Honestly 95% of the UK's foreign policy is a joke, only in it to destabilize the entire Middle East, for example the massive support to Israel just says it all (Remember the overthrown issue against the warrant for Tzipi Livni! )
Even if its for oil Libyans say SO WHAT!! Libyans are prepared to pay the price as long as Gaddafi goes, anyway Gaddafi was actually giving oil to the west so whats the difference, its a matter of principle something Mr Gallow doesn seem to know.
NATO deliberately let the two parties fight themselves, with the objective of keeping a balance between those parties. In this way the revolution becomes a sort of self-annihilation of the Libyan people. The parties should realise this, and stop killing each other. They'll end up much weakened, and the West will just absorb them and suck the country dry.
i recon this video is about 4 weeks old. interesting how george talks about a long bitter battle and here we are in early May and NATO are left with the only option of personal and illegal assasination of gaddaffi and have killed his family.
Sou you want me to expose yet one stupidity of yours?
Do you really?
Ok.
So you are telling me that US army and your politicians are authorizing bombardment of cities while being infromed that bombardment will cause no innocent people getting killed?
If that is true then you have the most INCOMPETANT government ever and make dictators look like Einstein.
Or we put his BS aside and deal with the real problem that they infact are inform that there will be civilian causlties.
However that is not an issue the real issue with this is that you rather see your troops killing innocents instead of watching dictators killing innocents.
You kill innocent people in order to bring them freedom which is such a flawed logic that only Americans cant see it.
You just want to show me a comparision between a shit country and even shitter country it doesnt matter your country still is shit.
O rly?
You dont disconnect internet?
THats funny even youtube (which is in US) bans and blocks certian users for exercising freedom of speech not to mention how many websites have been taken down in the course of years.
Check about statistics your shitty country Isnt most free and democratic that would be sweeden after that comes netehrlands you are like 10th or 12th.
Seperation of church and state in USA?
Hahahaha then why do you even have evolution vs creationism debates?
Or NATIONAL DAY OF PRAYER.
Not only that you dont know about other countries you are ignorant of yours aswell.
Al queda has more to do with politics then anything else.
So you are telling me that When Americans killed civilians during first gulf war, during cold war giving weapons and funding terror groups against soviets in middle east etc...
Has nothing to do with WTC but infact religion has?
Hello if religion was a issue they would blow up your wtc when it was built.
What did they just suddenly choose we gonna kill some americans because of religion?
@IRightYouWrong good point but u left out america gave sadam the chemical weapons to do so so they obviously had no problem with him doing it all these years... its only recently that sadam started rejecting american dollars with obviously had a massive effect on americas economy.. dont get me wrong sadam was a asshole but america was helping it self not the people.. and next not forget americas new bases in iraq and afghanistan
Saudi Arabia is the world's biggest producere of oil, would it not make sense then, if our pure intrest was oil, to attack Saudi Arabia. Gaddafi was on the verge of mass killing in Benghazi and the intervention was late in coming but saved thousands of lives. We have the stronger army, better trained, better equipped than any arab country. It makes perfect sense that we should be able to defend a popular uprising against the actions of a lunatic!
@helloground i think the point is why dont we help all the other poor bastards in the middle east, if an internationally recognised nutter is running a country with plenty of oil hes an easy target for some yummy oil. it has fuck all to do with human rights.
@yippykaiye Ghaddafi was happily giving us oil though before, on the oil front the best situation for us would be to let ghaddafi slaughter the people of Benghazi and return the country to his control, let it stabalise and w could ignore the human rights violations and buy their oil. This intervention has not helped our oil companies, it's pushed up prices. I don't agree with the tyrants in charge of Saudi and personally think we shud extend our intervention 2 all areas where HR are being abused
@yippykaiye If we did not intervene we would have witnessed the masacre of the people in Benghazi and I feel that Cameron, Obama and Sarkosy made a morally correct descision, clearly in modrn international politics it is unlikely that Human rights were the sole priority but I feel confident they were the main one, as I said Saudi Arabia is the biggest oil producere in the region, if our intrest was purly motivated by oil then they would be the obvious target with it's HR record as well!
@helloground hr is simply a cover. intervention in libya will likely cause ongoing hr abuses and a lengthy conflict. we can attack libya because it is an international outcast. we cant attack saudi arabia because its royal family have too many ties to the western world.
basically, we could either choose to keep paying gaddafi for his oil or raze his country to the ground and pump it out the ground ourselves. the appropriate fat cats pick the latter, they dont give a fuck about human rights
@yippykaiye hr were on the brink of total dissintergration, don't you remember Ghaddafi's blood curdling speech "going door to door" in Benghazi and "killing the traitor", this was the only evidence put forward to the UN to guarentee the resolution and the only evidence put forward to the english parliment and the French and American congress. HR were clearly being abused by Ghaddafi, video evidence showing his mercinaries shooting on protesters with heavy weapons fire, so where's the cover up??
@yippykaiye Also on the Saudi issue, our deals with the Saudi's are purly buisness, the idea that King Abdullah and his pathetic drips for a family have any political influence on western politicians is a complete fabrication by Michael Moore. For example if the Saudi royal family had a strong hold on western politics why would we initiate regime change in both Iraq and Afghanistan, the Taliban nd Bahth'ist regimes were fuly supported by Saudi and they showed publicly their views the conflicts
@yippykaiye An oil company wants to buy oil for the cheapest possible price, and ghaddafi was allowing that. He sells us oil at a cheap price, in return we sold him state of the art weaponary and intergrated him into the Inter'tnl community. Without an intervention oil would remain cheap(er) because Ghaddafi would have retaken control of the country. With the intervention lives were saved but oil prices have risen...there fore how was HR just a cover??
@yippykaiye You can't be serious, why would we attack Saudi Arabia when it's the biggest western ally in the middle east? permanent american military base on their soil included, and the corrupt saudi elite benefit from it greatly.
I can't believe people like you buy this propaganda for dummies, military interventions for the people's human rights LOL.
Where are the superpowers when children starve to death in Africa or are enslaved in sweatshops in Bangladesh, a lot cheaper to redress, but?
@yippykaiye I can see that now! I must've replied to the wrong comment, apologies mate. Glad you didn't go ballistic on me and send the marines...Lol. Peace
@helloground the yemen and bahrain government is 100 times worse then lybias u dont see uk or america there do u? muslims go crazy over the west afghanistan wat do u think would happen if they entered the holly place saudi arabia.... iraqs oil 30 trillion, lybias oil 3 trillion... seriously y would they risk there men to help arabs when they obviously dont like them
LOL oh Galloway, theres more oil in Bahrain and Libya was already selling oil to western world! I suppose the UN is in cote d'ivoire for the choclate?
yeah yeah it's all about the oil..... Libya only has around 2% of the worlds oil reserves. Why aren't we invading Canada, Venezuela etc Galloway should just fuck off and not get be given any kind of platform...
@obnoxiousbastard obviously because they are allies with the west... ur probably a retard that thinks the west invaded iraq to liberate the ppl and not for there oil... george speaks the truth.. if we had a president like george we could have a chance at world peace
Denying massacres of Tianamen, ignoring genocide in darfur, prostituting himself with baashist dictators from Syria and Iraq (first one is massacring protesters and last one was Saddam, georgie and omie) as well as terorists he doesnt have the balls to admit hezbollah and hamas are terrorists. You didn't watched clown Galloway videos...
@cynicalandskeptical do the exact oppisite.. thats the problem these corrupt governments like britian and usa who think they r the world police (when is suits them and they can benefit from it) what terrorist activity have hezbollah been involved in?? defending lebanon when israel decided to invade them?? so whos the terrorist?? i didnt see hezbollah invade anyone... OPEN UR EYES... they only go into a country with oil..
@omie3046 Err, killing 85 people in a bombing in Buenos Aires Argentina, the land of many of victims (wounded included) in 1994 is not terrorism? Who is the terrorist? Hezbollah...
Oh, so you dont care with the massacre of rebelled populations by victorious Khadafi? SHAME ON YOU FOR SHUTTING YOUR EYES TO VICTIMS OF KHADAFI!
They do it for oil? As long as a dictator is replaced by democracy, massacre of rebels families is avoided i dont care with motives: the means & ends are more important.
@cynicalandskeptical Right the same way they ended the dictatorial regime of Saddam Hussein, GTFO!!!! Irak now is NOTHING , has NOTHING , oil stealed by 'private companies', terror increased 1000fold since 2003 US invasion! Get lost Pro-Israel retard
@cynicalandskeptical They endepth theirselves because they need to keep pumping precious tax dollars into their soldiers since joining the army still means u need to pay your Soldiers/generals/pay for new equipment/pay for the daily costs made by soldiers to survive(gas/food/drink) Smart ppl think logistics! War cost an INSANE amount of cash, and despite their huge budgetairy loss, they still have ridiculously low gasprices! .IF US NEVER INVADED IT WOULDNT HAVE BEEN THIS BAD YOUR FAULT BITCH!
Increase of Oil Prices world wide is the cause of these chaos in oil producing countries. For every penny the prices of oil goes up, the oil companies stand to make Billions. Even Gaddafi is going to make money because of this chaos.
Thank you BP, Shell, ..... The army's of the world are hired by the rich.. Democracy means rich people rule...They have always done it and they will...No I am not communist either (I am not ant). But Democracy has to be watched by everyone or it will go corrupt.
@tizzard1970 i agree 100% but theres no oil in yemen or bahrain so they wont go in there... and i honestly think they dont have the balls to enter saudi.. blood for oil !!
@tizzard1970 In the name of Allah, most gracious most merciful; George Galloway is an independent thinker, He is not suggesting that Yemen, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia are worth an invasion but the complete opposite. Other countries can not play puppet master of another Nation. The People of Arabia are standing up in a wave accross the middle east. Islam is a way of life and can be integrated with Modern Technology as a way of correcting through the middle east. Salaam,Shalom,Peace!
he's now saying "I support all these revolutions" but when there were demonstrations in Iran he said that the demonstrators were "anarchists" or "elitests" and called them names. he defended the regime.
also how come he doesn't mention Syria in which there are also protests. it's because he's a friend of the dictator Assad.
it's true that the west are hypocrites but Galloway himself is also a big hypocrite
@CIarKent George Galloway\s inconsistency is irrelevant & piddling in the face of this outrageous half baked rubbish that's going on in Libya right now. Considering the UK is supposed to be boracic its remarkable to me that we can go spend 100s of millions supporting a disorganised bunch of people we know almost nothing about wage a war they cannot win in a country whose culture we don't understand.
@PhreakStep i'm not american nor do I support america in everything.
but Saddam was much worse than america or israel and Galloway still supported him despite his crimes. that's why he's a hypocrite.
Saddam definately did want to paint himself as a socialist leader just like the North Korean leader calls himself a socialist. the soviets also supported north korea, would you say there's socialism or communism there?
Dude stick with your smallville movies please you dont know anything about the wrold.
Saddam was worse then USA and Israel?
You must be retarded.
Please provide me with some of his crimes and then look at USA or Israel and compare.
A hypocrite si someone who accuses someone of something when in reality he is doing the same aka USA.
Well according to the USA NK is communistic but of course as we all know communism and socialism is and was nonexistend in the sense of true communism
Galloway is a pussy LITERALLY
sasua741 6 days ago
You just cant mess with george galloway. he makes everyone sound stupid!!!
pathanxxx 1 month ago
Poor George Galloway,
Now that Gaddafi and Kim Jong IL are gone, he has two less dictators to praise...
MrForextrader123 2 months ago
@MrForextrader123 Obama is a dictator. Gaddafi ISN'T.
PrimaGymnast47 2 months ago
@MrForextrader123 nob
ozmond2600 1 month ago
George is a voice of sanity in an insane world. When Bush trumped up charges against Iraq, I fiercely defended him, and our actions. Ppl from other countries maintained it was oil, and only oil. Hell hath no fury like a nation disgraced by a greedy leader. We are seeing it bold face and ugly, and the markets and banks are their butt buddies. How do we have the money to go into one conflict after another? We profit off misery..simple.
pjamesbda 2 months ago 5
A great response, love you George!
jvs101 3 months ago
Looks like George is mad because he lost his benefactors. First Saddam and now Gadaffi .Never mind George there will be other mad dictators squandering their citizens wealth by donating to you , sorry your 'charities ' .
By the way your are an ELECTED MP who can ( hoepfully ) lose his seat next time around IF the people chose,.The LIbyans NEVER chose . Give them a chance for Christs sake , sorry , make that Muhamad . !
XLENDIBAY1 5 months ago
@XLENDIBAY1 George Galloway is not an ELECTED MP. Also, it is YOU'RE or YOU ARE not YOUR ARE. Galloway is a catholic you fool.
whatahellofashout 5 months ago
@whatahellofashout sorry about that , your right , the electorate decided to kick the fool out , probably his bizarre appearance on BB didnt go down well with the voters in Brick Lane . What do I know , I ve only been to Libya about 40 times . Hahahaha
or should I say Al Humdarillah . !
XLENDIBAY1 1 month ago
@XLENDIBAY1 You have done it again, it's YOU'RE or YOU ARE, hahaha
whatahellofashout 1 month ago
@whatahellofashout yep your right , sorry about that , seems the conservative , Muslim voters of Brick Lane had enough of gorgeous G, probably his truly bizarre appearance on BBrother didnt help . Sorry again , I was in Tripoli a lot over the last few years and missed all that . Ha Ha Ha or should I say Al Humdurillilah !
XLENDIBAY1 1 month ago
@XLENDIBAY1 Electoral boundary changes resulted in lose of seat. How many times do I have to tell you it's YOU'RE or YOU ARE, hahaha
whatahellofashout 1 month ago
@XLENDIBAY1 what are you saying Libyans wanted Kadaffi out? I don't understand your reply?!
janjan55555 2 weeks ago
@XLENDIBAY1 you talk shite
ozmond2600 1 month ago
@ozmond2600 really intelligent reply ozzy , thanks for that , just confirmed my best or worse fears.
XLENDI
XLENDIBAY1 1 month ago
George Galloway is spot on with his assessment on LIBYA....AMERICAN,BRITISH,FRENCH company's putting pressure on their governments to protect their cartel. The Libyan 'rebels' were supplied armour by AMERICA to over-throw GADDAFI. What about SYRIA? The tyrants are killing their own people there..Why don't we go in there?Sorry nothing in it for us?
MegaTrainspotter 5 months ago
@mrgilles1990? What can we sell of next? not much left...N.H.S,COUNCIL SERVICES,MAIL SERVICE..Should be worth a few quid to the parasites.'Call me Dave' Cameron. 'WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER' HA HA HA HA HA..........
MegaTrainspotter 5 months ago
@mrgilles1990? If that's the case why hasn't deregulating the banks stopped the greedy sods from continuing to award themselves huge bonuses?You are mistaken the banks have not been re-nationalised.People have been conned.Welcome to Broken Britain. Remember the days when gas,electricity,telephone were all public services? What happened? We sold of the bloody lot and now we are seeing the consequences. Private utility company's playing with people lives.Old age pensioners freezing to death .
MegaTrainspotter 5 months ago
The reason New lie-bour kicked george galloway out of the party is because he put the rest of the charlatans to shame..Bow your head BLAIR.MANDELSON,STRAW,PRESTCOTT AND THE REST..To many to mention..
MegaTrainspotter 5 months ago
Wow what a wise smart man good luck to you mr. galloway you are true leader
daenalislam 5 months ago
@mrgilles1990? Didn't the 'people' have to bail out these capitalist banks because they brought this country to it's knees?So going by your argument...either does capitalism.Under cameron's big con..erm..i mean big society..The richer will get richer and the poorer poorer..
MegaTrainspotter 5 months ago
@MegaTrainspotter No The governments chose to deregulate the banks and then bail them out.
The banks were treated like a public service, not a capitalist one if you think about it.
CameCON is not a capitalist or a conservative, he is a traitor career politician.
In my perfect world the Conservative party would be destroyed and a new radical pro-British capitalist party made in instead. The modern day conservative party is a EUphile corporatist party.
MrGilles1990 5 months ago
Why haven't we got someone like GALLOWAY running this country? The man speaks the simple TRUTH.Watch and learn cameron...watch and learn..
MegaTrainspotter 6 months ago
@MegaTrainspotter Economic collapse, that's why.
Socialism does not work, tried and tested, it just made everyone poor except the political elite.
MrGilles1990 5 months ago
@MrGilles1990 that's why countries like Cuba/Libya have the same life expectance of a citizen in Washington right?! That's why people in Libya have BETTER living conditions under Kadaffi then under Cameron? Socialism is a gift but most be controlled properly by the government to avoid Russian Sovjet situations. Some countries actually DO have a working socialist system where the civilians benefit FAR more than capitalism
janjan55555 5 months ago
@janjan55555 Do you think Britian or the US are capitalist?
P.S Libya and Cuba have a lower life expectancy than the US.
Socialism is theft, not a gift.
Cuba/Libya/the rest of the poor socialist states, would do so much better with a capitalist economy.
MrGilles1990 5 months ago
@MrGilles1990 that's where you have BADLY researched; Officially Cuba has a life expectance 6months longer then ppl in Washington! Libyans have the same life expectance... (Look it up if you don't believe me!) Cuban stats are available and so are Libyan! Right a capitalist economy would be devastating in those countries, the market price would be suffocating the locals, I am clearly not talking to an economist :)
janjan55555 5 months ago
MrGilles1990 5 months ago
@MrGilles1990 oke; United nations very very objective source ....NOT! Discussion closed, too retarded to discuss with =)
janjan55555 5 months ago
@janjan55555 your not retarded, your just below 40!
MrGilles1990 5 months ago
@MrGilles1990 Conclusion; if you are under 40 and NOT follow Mainstream Media then you are retarded?
janjan55555 5 months ago
@janjan55555 I don't follow the Bolshevik broadcasting corporation, that does not make me a socialist.
I make my own opinion on things, especially when it comes to war, because the Mainstream Media has a habit of being the propaganda tool of the liblabcon.
MrGilles1990 5 months ago
@MrGilles1990 IMPOSSIBLE!!! You made one big mistake is by adressing your source as being apart of a non existing group, you can't just say I don't use Mainstream as a reference nor offstream (or what you call Bolshebnik corp, evne though I am not even talking about RT -.- , there is more to offstream than RT btw!)
janjan55555 5 months ago
@janjan55555 I like RT.
Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation aka BBC, its a play of words.
RT was the only news outlet that did not spout propaganda for war or the "rebels".
MrGilles1990 5 months ago
@MrGilles1990 Good for you!
janjan55555 5 months ago
Comment removed
MegaTrainspotter 6 months ago
gaddafi has to stay in libya. and gaddafi has to stay in power. long live gaddafi. gaddafi has big dick he will show to nato and rebel.
DidarMiahMA 7 months ago
europe invaide libya to kill gaddafi for oil and property. gaddafi kill all the nato and rebal for heavyness of your dick. gaddafi has to stay in power becose he has big dick. long live gaddafi and his femily, and his regim.
DidarMiahMA 7 months ago
is there no one intelligent enough to interview this man. another sky news donkey peddling the party line,
kustjagara 8 months ago
george galloway always says the truth
im going to libya to help!
lol82490 8 months ago
Gadafi was talking about nationalizing oil, which is why Mossadegh was overthrown via Operation Ajax..
.
Unbeknown to most, the Libyan government had a public central bank, not a private one like the Federal Reserve or ECB. The Libyan dollar was backed by billions in gold and they had almost no debt.
.
Gadafi was also about to demand payment for oil in gold...
.
This is why the "rebels" established a new private central bank immediately and why all foreign oil contracts were renewed.
jakesteel1 8 months ago
I have to say that allthought I agree with much of what Galloway says , I still am very suspicious of him. Many observers of Galloway claim he is used by the establishment to control dissent and is a willing agent of the establishment. Ask yourself this question . why has Galloway and the so called "anti war movement" keeping a low profile whilst British and American Impearlist are spreading the flames of war in Libya and Syria. Why no massive rally in London aganist NATO bombing of Libya.
riseingstur 8 months ago
If Zionist Impearlist American backed so called "Rebels" (who number less than 5000 seize power and NATO acting as their airforce,) it will be sad day for the Libyan people. Just like in Iraq when Zionist Impearlist invaders seized power and ousted Saddam Hussein , the killing will start in earnest. The Zionist Impearlist will insist that all remannts of the old Libyan Goverment are put to death, anyone who supported the legtimate Libyan Goverment will be murdred, along with the educated , p1
riseingstur 8 months ago
2 teachers, doctors , just about anyone with education or brains to organise to fight the Zionist American Impearlist takeover of Libyan soverigntry and theft of Libyas vast oil reserves. In Iraq Blackwater a private American army , paid for by the American taxpayers , and controlled by the CIA , carried out a systematic buthering of Acedemics, doctors , lawers , teachers etc in Iraq in what they called a clensing of anyone or group who could be able to organise a fightback to ocupation.
riseingstur 8 months ago
nato killing inocent civilean by bombing, don't think gaddafi doesn't have big dick and heavy one. see wat heppen to rebal.
DidarMiahMA 8 months ago
Just because no one is doing anything in other countries being oppressed doesnt mean no one should do anything about Libya. If you can start with one its always a help and even if its about Oil, as long as the dictator is out the region will be better off because non of you chatting against this campaign know anything about gaddafi and what hes done and he would do. Plus even if there was NATO sell to the council weapons and you'll see that gaddafi will be gone in no time.
Thetruthisone 8 months ago
@Thetruthisone We all taught that the demise of Dictator Saddam would bring PEACE and enlightenment, and look how that ended .... UK+USA were failing /are failing horribly at this very moment. Plz do u even know why 3 million out of 5.5million Libyans are still DIE hard supporting Kaddafi?! DO u know why?! Not because they are die hard fans of him, they don't want their country to degrade into nothingness as in Iraq! And that's a big argument itself, Libya was NOT entirely revolting....
janjan55555 8 months ago
@Thetruthisone revolting against KAddafi, you still had a majority(and still have) that supports Kaddafi unlike Egypte and Tunesia where nearly 99% was against the current government system and it was clear that both of the Presidents had to go! I am not convinced Libya is the same analogue situation. It's rather East vs WestLibya (primarly ofcourse!) So my advise would be, GTFO Libya and save your tax money for your own nation, its for oil simple as that LOOK AT YEMEN (FAAAAR worse than Libya!)
janjan55555 8 months ago
@janjan5555 First you say Gaddafi has majority support unlike 99% of egyot and tunisia, which is nonesense and just shows you dont know and you dont follow the current situation in those countries. Then you say its east vs west in Libya, which is utter nonesense as well and shows you shouldnt be speaking about Libya because you seriously have no clue whats going on and whats been happening for 41 years. I dont even know where to begin with you you have such a massive gap in knowledge ahh forgt t
Thetruthisone 8 months ago
@Thetruthisone maybe I mistyped; Egypte +Tunesia actually did have a wooping 99% AGAINST Mubarak/ben Ali! I have visited Tripoli/Cairo/Tunes, big difference. Ppl dont sleep in the streets in Libya, Libya was FKING NOWHERE before Kaddafi, it now stands as having worlds biggest water infrastructural system, and that with a country dominated by desert! unlike Tunesia/Egypt, who have received BILLIONS of dollars of Western nations to tighten bands and did that help the civilians????? NO!!!!
janjan55555 8 months ago
@Thetruthisone Just u wait when USA/UK/FRANCE take over Libya; u will be wishing your country never had been asking for help from the west! Don't tell me I didn't warn u!! A situation like Iraq is near for your pathetic collaborating ass!! They are currently negotiating what will happen with Libya after Kaddafi; SCENARIO=> Steal oil , Kill Kaddafi publicly , Terrorism attacks will mass spawn on a daily base u can no longer walk normally in streets , innocents will be put in jails and get raped
janjan55555 8 months ago
@Thetruthisone U say Libya is different than Iraq? How is that different? Western nations trying ILLEGALLY to invade a country, thinking u can set democracy while the country hasn't seen democracy in over 100 years! It's perfectly analogue to Iraq; same wealth Uk/France is after(Over 100 BILLION pounds of investments from both countries!)while sitting helpless watch Yemen get crushed yb the dictatorial regime of Saleh! Hypocrisie at its best...
janjan55555 8 months ago
Mr Galloways' political policy is: Anything Downing street does is wrong and completely immoral and we will always find a way of criticising the government for anything it does or any policy it it legislates. Thats all you are Gallow , just someone who just loves criticising. You crit the arab leaders all the time so what were YOU prepared to do for the arab people to lift the injustice upon them? unfort the time came for change but you completely ignored it and you will be known for tht always
Thetruthisone 8 months ago
@Thetruthisone So Uk's foreign policy has been a succes?IS that what you are trying to say?!raq; no succes, Libya,;FAR FROM succes. Honestly 95% of the UK's foreign policy is a joke, only in it to destabilize the entire Middle East, for example the massive support to Israel just says it all (Remember the overthrown issue against the warrant for Tzipi Livni! )
janjan55555 8 months ago
Even if its for oil Libyans say SO WHAT!! Libyans are prepared to pay the price as long as Gaddafi goes, anyway Gaddafi was actually giving oil to the west so whats the difference, its a matter of principle something Mr Gallow doesn seem to know.
Thetruthisone 8 months ago
War Crimes By NATO for Oil
jamil316 8 months ago
more good work from george, but why is the presenter so god awfully thick? her questions are so one dimensional, so transparent, so lame.
Yusef100 9 months ago
NATO deliberately let the two parties fight themselves, with the objective of keeping a balance between those parties. In this way the revolution becomes a sort of self-annihilation of the Libyan people. The parties should realise this, and stop killing each other. They'll end up much weakened, and the West will just absorb them and suck the country dry.
FlyingDutchman65 9 months ago
i recon this video is about 4 weeks old. interesting how george talks about a long bitter battle and here we are in early May and NATO are left with the only option of personal and illegal assasination of gaddaffi and have killed his family.
right again george
timefallen 10 months ago
Galloway is rare indeed; an honest politician, almost an oxymoron thesedays.
OrthodoxDarwinist 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
So if they are informed about innocent civilians will get killed that pretty much means they are also systematicly targeting the civilians.
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
Sou you want me to expose yet one stupidity of yours?
Do you really?
Ok.
So you are telling me that US army and your politicians are authorizing bombardment of cities while being infromed that bombardment will cause no innocent people getting killed?
If that is true then you have the most INCOMPETANT government ever and make dictators look like Einstein.
Or we put his BS aside and deal with the real problem that they infact are inform that there will be civilian causlties.
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
To answer your question the answer is no.
However that is not an issue the real issue with this is that you rather see your troops killing innocents instead of watching dictators killing innocents.
You kill innocent people in order to bring them freedom which is such a flawed logic that only Americans cant see it.
PhreakStep 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IRightYouWrong
What about your no 1. friend Israel who slaughters innocent palestinians on daily basis.
Not to mention they occupied Palestinia and used chemical weapons shuch as white phosphorus and you have done nothing about it.
So please stfu.
USa is a shitty country
You are a fucking moron
I rest my fucking case.
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
You talk about protecting innocents yet you killed more innocent then their soldiers.
What is your justification for that now smartass?
Those are facts and if you care to research it you will be suprised about how many proof you have.
USA isnt consern about removing dictators and protecting the innocent unless the country is rich with natural resources.
Turkey isnt muslim country they have secular and Turkey is in Europe so stfu moron.
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
No proofs tell me how many people did Saddam kill?
And how many did your troops kill in iraq and by that I mean innocent people.
Usa has a death toll of a million iraqis Saddam has like 20% of that.
Now tell me how is he worse?
And thats a proven fact
Not to mention other countries that you have destroyed such as Vietnam, Cambodia, Korea
Why are you fighting dictators in oil rich countries what about South America who are waging drug wars in your country?
What about Africa?
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
You just want to show me a comparision between a shit country and even shitter country it doesnt matter your country still is shit.
O rly?
You dont disconnect internet?
THats funny even youtube (which is in US) bans and blocks certian users for exercising freedom of speech not to mention how many websites have been taken down in the course of years.
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
I am not defending thos countries I am saying that you as a American you should clean up before your house and then clean up the houses of others.
The fact that you have places that teach creationism is a violation of your constitution.
The fact that you have 10 commandments monuments in government buildings is violation of counstitution
The facat that you have national day of prayer is violation of constitution.
Not to mention evangelists that influence your government.
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
I dont give a crap how better USA is from middle eastren countries.
The problem is you are NOT THE BEST country and you are not qualify to attack others when you are in shit.
What has al-queda to do with Afghanistan?
This is yet another point where you are just plain stupid.
Dont CIA documents reveal that 98% of the members of Al Queda come from Pakistan and Saudi Arabia?
And do you think alqueda is muslim?
They also attack other muslims so religion is a non issue.
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
Freedom of speech?
You mean like students getting taserd for asking questions?
If you say something wrong you can end up in gutanamo?
Come on.
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
Why are you saying unlike USA.
Pull your head out from your ass srsly.
Check about statistics your shitty country Isnt most free and democratic that would be sweeden after that comes netehrlands you are like 10th or 12th.
Seperation of church and state in USA?
Hahahaha then why do you even have evolution vs creationism debates?
Or NATIONAL DAY OF PRAYER.
Not only that you dont know about other countries you are ignorant of yours aswell.
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
Al queda has more to do with politics then anything else.
So you are telling me that When Americans killed civilians during first gulf war, during cold war giving weapons and funding terror groups against soviets in middle east etc...
Has nothing to do with WTC but infact religion has?
Hello if religion was a issue they would blow up your wtc when it was built.
What did they just suddenly choose we gonna kill some americans because of religion?
Put your head out of your ass
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
Since you are dumb American I can help you count few fascist singns.
Supremacy of the military
Powerful Nationalism
identifying enemies or scapegoars as unifying cause.
Controlled mass media
Obssesion with national security
Obsession with crime and punishment
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
Then STFU you ignorant fat American.
If you think your country didnt blow up any buildings and people in other countries you are retarded.
And if you think Terrorists blow your WTC because of Islamic beliefs you are fucking retarded.
And btw what had Iraq with blowing WTC?
Or Castro?
Kim Jong IL?
What do they have blowing up things in the name of religion?
You are stupid American.
USA is a fascist state check what are the singns of fascism and then compare them to usa.
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong good point but u left out america gave sadam the chemical weapons to do so so they obviously had no problem with him doing it all these years... its only recently that sadam started rejecting american dollars with obviously had a massive effect on americas economy.. dont get me wrong sadam was a asshole but america was helping it self not the people.. and next not forget americas new bases in iraq and afghanistan
omie3046 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
Isnt USA like no 1. enviroment enemy?
USA starves its people too for first world country it has very high % of poverty.
Not to mention crime rates and morality rates.
You should act in your country first before going and judge someone else in other.
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@IRightYouWrong
You have just numbered UK, Israel and USA and its politicians.
In that statement.
Usa invaded countless countries in the course of history killing over millions of people.
Usa used not only chemical weapon but also the only country to ever use Atomic bomb in warfare.
Usa supports terroristic activites (those who commit terroristic acts against their enemies.
Its funny how USA fights war on terror only in middle east when you have terrorists all across the globe.
PhreakStep 10 months ago
Saudi Arabia is the world's biggest producere of oil, would it not make sense then, if our pure intrest was oil, to attack Saudi Arabia. Gaddafi was on the verge of mass killing in Benghazi and the intervention was late in coming but saved thousands of lives. We have the stronger army, better trained, better equipped than any arab country. It makes perfect sense that we should be able to defend a popular uprising against the actions of a lunatic!
helloground 10 months ago
@helloground Who is we?
idlebrainidol 10 months ago
@idlebrainidol Britain, France, USA most of Nato....the people involved in the intervention!
helloground 10 months ago
@helloground i think the point is why dont we help all the other poor bastards in the middle east, if an internationally recognised nutter is running a country with plenty of oil hes an easy target for some yummy oil. it has fuck all to do with human rights.
yippykaiye 10 months ago
@helloground Doesn't USA have a stronger army without Britain France the rest of NATO?
idlebrainidol 10 months ago
@helloground and if we were doin it for the sake of human rights, we would attack the saudis as well.
yippykaiye 10 months ago
@yippykaiye Ghaddafi was happily giving us oil though before, on the oil front the best situation for us would be to let ghaddafi slaughter the people of Benghazi and return the country to his control, let it stabalise and w could ignore the human rights violations and buy their oil. This intervention has not helped our oil companies, it's pushed up prices. I don't agree with the tyrants in charge of Saudi and personally think we shud extend our intervention 2 all areas where HR are being abused
helloground 10 months ago
@yippykaiye If we did not intervene we would have witnessed the masacre of the people in Benghazi and I feel that Cameron, Obama and Sarkosy made a morally correct descision, clearly in modrn international politics it is unlikely that Human rights were the sole priority but I feel confident they were the main one, as I said Saudi Arabia is the biggest oil producere in the region, if our intrest was purly motivated by oil then they would be the obvious target with it's HR record as well!
helloground 10 months ago
@helloground hr is simply a cover. intervention in libya will likely cause ongoing hr abuses and a lengthy conflict. we can attack libya because it is an international outcast. we cant attack saudi arabia because its royal family have too many ties to the western world.
basically, we could either choose to keep paying gaddafi for his oil or raze his country to the ground and pump it out the ground ourselves. the appropriate fat cats pick the latter, they dont give a fuck about human rights
yippykaiye 10 months ago
@yippykaiye hr were on the brink of total dissintergration, don't you remember Ghaddafi's blood curdling speech "going door to door" in Benghazi and "killing the traitor", this was the only evidence put forward to the UN to guarentee the resolution and the only evidence put forward to the english parliment and the French and American congress. HR were clearly being abused by Ghaddafi, video evidence showing his mercinaries shooting on protesters with heavy weapons fire, so where's the cover up??
helloground 10 months ago
@yippykaiye Also on the Saudi issue, our deals with the Saudi's are purly buisness, the idea that King Abdullah and his pathetic drips for a family have any political influence on western politicians is a complete fabrication by Michael Moore. For example if the Saudi royal family had a strong hold on western politics why would we initiate regime change in both Iraq and Afghanistan, the Taliban nd Bahth'ist regimes were fuly supported by Saudi and they showed publicly their views the conflicts
helloground 10 months ago
@yippykaiye An oil company wants to buy oil for the cheapest possible price, and ghaddafi was allowing that. He sells us oil at a cheap price, in return we sold him state of the art weaponary and intergrated him into the Inter'tnl community. Without an intervention oil would remain cheap(er) because Ghaddafi would have retaken control of the country. With the intervention lives were saved but oil prices have risen...there fore how was HR just a cover??
helloground 10 months ago
@yippykaiye You can't be serious, why would we attack Saudi Arabia when it's the biggest western ally in the middle east? permanent american military base on their soil included, and the corrupt saudi elite benefit from it greatly.
I can't believe people like you buy this propaganda for dummies, military interventions for the people's human rights LOL.
Where are the superpowers when children starve to death in Africa or are enslaved in sweatshops in Bangladesh, a lot cheaper to redress, but?
geomusicmove 10 months ago
@geomusicmove if youd actually read what iv been saying, i agree with you :P
yippykaiye 10 months ago
@yippykaiye I can see that now! I must've replied to the wrong comment, apologies mate. Glad you didn't go ballistic on me and send the marines...Lol. Peace
geomusicmove 10 months ago
@helloground the yemen and bahrain government is 100 times worse then lybias u dont see uk or america there do u? muslims go crazy over the west afghanistan wat do u think would happen if they entered the holly place saudi arabia.... iraqs oil 30 trillion, lybias oil 3 trillion... seriously y would they risk there men to help arabs when they obviously dont like them
omie3046 10 months ago
LOL oh Galloway, theres more oil in Bahrain and Libya was already selling oil to western world! I suppose the UN is in cote d'ivoire for the choclate?
SeamusMcAnus 10 months ago
yeah yeah it's all about the oil..... Libya only has around 2% of the worlds oil reserves. Why aren't we invading Canada, Venezuela etc Galloway should just fuck off and not get be given any kind of platform...
obnoxiousbastard 10 months ago
@obnoxiousbastard obviously because they are allies with the west... ur probably a retard that thinks the west invaded iraq to liberate the ppl and not for there oil... george speaks the truth.. if we had a president like george we could have a chance at world peace
omie3046 10 months ago 12
@omie3046 @OrthodoxDarwinist How could president george would give us world peace?
By sucking the balls of dictators of this world?
Denying massacres of Tianamen, ignoring genocide in darfur, prostituting himself with baashist dictators from Syria and Iraq (first one is massacring protesters and last one was Saddam, georgie and omie) as well as terorists he doesnt have the balls to admit hezbollah and hamas are terrorists. You didn't watched clown Galloway videos...
Demagogy = honesty, right?
cynicalandskeptical 9 months ago
@cynicalandskeptical do the exact oppisite.. thats the problem these corrupt governments like britian and usa who think they r the world police (when is suits them and they can benefit from it) what terrorist activity have hezbollah been involved in?? defending lebanon when israel decided to invade them?? so whos the terrorist?? i didnt see hezbollah invade anyone... OPEN UR EYES... they only go into a country with oil..
omie3046 9 months ago
@omie3046 Err, killing 85 people in a bombing in Buenos Aires Argentina, the land of many of victims (wounded included) in 1994 is not terrorism? Who is the terrorist? Hezbollah...
Oh, so you dont care with the massacre of rebelled populations by victorious Khadafi? SHAME ON YOU FOR SHUTTING YOUR EYES TO VICTIMS OF KHADAFI!
They do it for oil? As long as a dictator is replaced by democracy, massacre of rebels families is avoided i dont care with motives: the means & ends are more important.
cynicalandskeptical 9 months ago
@cynicalandskeptical Right the same way they ended the dictatorial regime of Saddam Hussein, GTFO!!!! Irak now is NOTHING , has NOTHING , oil stealed by 'private companies', terror increased 1000fold since 2003 US invasion! Get lost Pro-Israel retard
janjan55555 8 months ago
@janjan55555
asshole, the terror you mentioned is made by islamists who hate Israel and democracy.
How can war and destruction make US enrich with their oil? Its in economical crisis.
You are stupid to face it but its your problem, but who is killed its their victims, maily iraqis.
Religious bigot.
cynicalandskeptical 8 months ago
@cynicalandskeptical They endepth theirselves because they need to keep pumping precious tax dollars into their soldiers since joining the army still means u need to pay your Soldiers/generals/pay for new equipment/pay for the daily costs made by soldiers to survive(gas/food/drink) Smart ppl think logistics! War cost an INSANE amount of cash, and despite their huge budgetairy loss, they still have ridiculously low gasprices! .IF US NEVER INVADED IT WOULDNT HAVE BEEN THIS BAD YOUR FAULT BITCH!
janjan55555 8 months ago
@janjan55555 Anyone with a right mind knows its different.
Thetruthisone 8 months ago
@obnoxiousbastard That's because you idiot, Libya have more oil than the whole of Britain.
strongbadassman 10 months ago
KILLING OUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS AROUND THE WORLD.
kalevra01 10 months ago
inshALLAH the imam comes soon...
kalevra01 10 months ago
Increase of Oil Prices world wide is the cause of these chaos in oil producing countries. For every penny the prices of oil goes up, the oil companies stand to make Billions. Even Gaddafi is going to make money because of this chaos.
Thank you BP, Shell, ..... The army's of the world are hired by the rich.. Democracy means rich people rule...They have always done it and they will...No I am not communist either (I am not ant). But Democracy has to be watched by everyone or it will go corrupt.
DaryoushKadkhodayan 10 months ago
Go George!
RastaOnCasters 11 months ago
Amen George
Yemen, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia must be next on the agenda. They are killing people in the streets as we speak for protesting.
OIL is the only reason all this shit is going on
tizzard1970 11 months ago 11
@tizzard1970 so sad...AAHH :(
druusky 11 months ago
@tizzard1970 i agree 100% but theres no oil in yemen or bahrain so they wont go in there... and i honestly think they dont have the balls to enter saudi.. blood for oil !!
omie3046 10 months ago
@tizzard1970 In the name of Allah, most gracious most merciful; George Galloway is an independent thinker, He is not suggesting that Yemen, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia are worth an invasion but the complete opposite. Other countries can not play puppet master of another Nation. The People of Arabia are standing up in a wave accross the middle east. Islam is a way of life and can be integrated with Modern Technology as a way of correcting through the middle east. Salaam,Shalom,Peace!
wess2583 8 months ago
lol what he said about Tony Blair.
and what about you Mr Galloway and your old friendship with Saddam Hussein and now with Ahmadinejad
Hypocrite
CIarKent 11 months ago
@CIarKent Hypocrite or not he's speaking a truth which cannot be denied.
stretchmorgan 11 months ago
@stretchmorgan no he's not.
he's now saying "I support all these revolutions" but when there were demonstrations in Iran he said that the demonstrators were "anarchists" or "elitests" and called them names. he defended the regime.
also how come he doesn't mention Syria in which there are also protests. it's because he's a friend of the dictator Assad.
it's true that the west are hypocrites but Galloway himself is also a big hypocrite
CIarKent 11 months ago
@CIarKent George Galloway\s inconsistency is irrelevant & piddling in the face of this outrageous half baked rubbish that's going on in Libya right now. Considering the UK is supposed to be boracic its remarkable to me that we can go spend 100s of millions supporting a disorganised bunch of people we know almost nothing about wage a war they cannot win in a country whose culture we don't understand.
stretchmorgan 11 months ago
@CIarKent
YOu are a moron.
Tell me one American, UK etc... polliticians that werent Hussein supporters in the past?
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@PhreakStep the americans and british turned against Saddam after he murdered civilians and invaded kuwait. that's when Galloway became his friend
CIarKent 10 months ago
@CIarKent
Oh really?
But if saddam attacked Iran with the same chemical weapons it would be ok.
And btw who gave him those weapons in the first place?
You should think before you talk nonsense.
After the gulf war 1 they start cooperating again.
And of course he praised Saddam you wouldnt?
Russians praised Stalin and Germans praised Hitler even when in reality they didnt they went along with it because those people were sick EGOmaniacs.
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@PhreakStep the Soviets are the ones who gave Saddam most of his weapons.
Galloway is not an iraqi. he chose to go to Iraq and to suck Saddam's cock. it was his own choice
CIarKent 10 months ago
@CIarKent
What the fuck is wrong with you?
You must be an American.
Both sides gave Saddam weapons but the west succeded in presuading him to join his fight against the communists. Just like they did with Afghanistan.
You act like Soviets gave him weapons free of charge.
If soviets supported Hussein then we would have Communism or Socialism in Iraq like in Cuba but that is false.
He had his own reasons to praise Hussein whoes crimes are 1% those of the USA and Israel btw.
PhreakStep 10 months ago 2
@PhreakStep
Ok what are the crimes of Hussein?
He killed his own people?
FACT: USA killed them more.
He attacked civilians with chemical weapons?
FACT: USA attacked vietnam and their civilians with chemical weapons.
And many other countries.
He opressed his people:
FACT: Kinda like USA today when students get tasered for askin questions and where protests are restricted.
The same goes for education, healthcare and many other things.
PhreakStep 10 months ago 4
@PhreakStep i'm not american nor do I support america in everything.
but Saddam was much worse than america or israel and Galloway still supported him despite his crimes. that's why he's a hypocrite.
Saddam definately did want to paint himself as a socialist leader just like the North Korean leader calls himself a socialist. the soviets also supported north korea, would you say there's socialism or communism there?
CIarKent 10 months ago
@CIarKent
Dude stick with your smallville movies please you dont know anything about the wrold.
Saddam was worse then USA and Israel?
You must be retarded.
Please provide me with some of his crimes and then look at USA or Israel and compare.
A hypocrite si someone who accuses someone of something when in reality he is doing the same aka USA.
Well according to the USA NK is communistic but of course as we all know communism and socialism is and was nonexistend in the sense of true communism
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@CIarKent
Can you provide proof that he saddam wanted to paint himself as socialist?
If thats just your opinion then thats just a stupid assertion.
Because you like asserting instead of providing the proof I am geussing you believe in a god and you are religious.
PhreakStep 10 months ago
@CIarKent
All you do is talk just like Chritopher Hitchens about the world when you dont even know how the real world works.
Are dictators bad?
Depends on who do you ask.
Hussein had to rule Iraq with iron hand because that is how he stabilazed Iraq now when he is gone the 2 sects of muslims are killing eachother.
The same went with Tito he also ruled with iron hand but when he died Christian sects commited ethnic cleanisngs in the Balkans.
PhreakStep 10 months ago