Added: 3 years ago
From: MIT
Views: 34,792
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • MIT or UCLA for medicine?

  • nun hab was geiles entdeckt haha

  • This is a very helpful video from me. Thanks uploader.

  • rangle

  • he is an excellent professor. easy to follow

  • thank you. great lesson

  • The one person that disliked this didn't get into MIT.

  • is this the first year of college?

  • @Djole0 "It is the second semester in the freshman calculus sequence"

  • Is it just me, or does this lecture stop working at 2:31? I've restarted, but nothing.

  • @pdxginni Yes, it's just me. I had the screen maximized. Wouldn't pass without minimizing.

  • I am completely following the mit courseware to study my pre engineering courses awesome > thanks MIT

  • heh RANGLE! @ 17:15 i never took multi calc, he seems like a good prof

  • is there any way to change the bounds of integrations without drawing? because most of the times it wont be so easy to draw. (or i wont have the time to do it)

    cant i just plug in the bound values into the change of variable's equations or do some other calculus?

  • @fermixx he did it without the drawing... he drew the bounds.... and the way he figured the second bound drawing he did was just plug in the x y points into the substitution equations he made for u v...

  • Man... why didn't I find this sooner?! I could have maybe passed this semester's class with it. Oh well, maybe I still can if I somehow manage to ace the final...

  • What an amazing professor. The clarity he has and order he's going in would have really helped for when I was taking multivariate calc. I really appreciate his pointing out that it's a linear transformation and actually demonstrating it. It is wonderful that this is being made available to such a wide audience. Also: those boards are amazing and that yellow chalk is soooo bright @_@

  • How does Jacobian go with nonlinear transformations? Namely if I have u=g(x,y) v=h(x,y) then will dudv=|J|dxdy be satisfied where J=(dg/dx dg/dy; dh/dx dh/dy) ? (here d's are actually referring to partial derivatives)

  • @binyillikcinar i think da Jacobian works 4 ne case. The polar coordinate transformation and da last example were both non-linear.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • This was incredibly helpful; I don't have trouble with math, but it is soooo difficult to wade through all the jargon without someone translating for you.

    Thanks

  • prof. auroux rocks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Thank you a lot.

  • very good :)X

  • thanks :)

  • thats cool chalk.

  • thank you MIT this help me very much.

  • thx

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more