Em 1997, uma garota chamada Lauren estava caminhando em uma floresta, e de repente desapareceu, ninguém nunca encontrou-a até 2000, quando uma outra menina chamada Maria encontrou o corpo e marcas em seu peito, disseram: Não era bonita o suficiente "e, agora, você leu isso, ela aparecerá em seu espelho dizendo que você não é bonito o suficiente e matá-lo! (pela forma como o menina chamada Mary morreu pouco depois) Para se salvar colar este para 5 outros vídeos é verda
Well, the music and choreography are meant to evoke a sense of primitivism and exoticism, so based on the other comments it has clearly done what it set out to do. Right. On.
Ok! You can't immagine how it is now! The choreography ad evolved so much! And the dancers! Just try to see it for real! On stage! You gonna cry it's so amazing!!!
A lot has happened in music, dance and history since 1913. The reconstructed Nijinsky choreography looks 'interesting' but a dated sedate pageant all taking itself too earnestly. There is more direct power here
I think it's awesome. Look at how they are moving their bodies which is what dance is about and Béjart is a brilliant choreographer. It's sexy. I love it.
@meowkie I was having the same problems but in my researches i found out that you need to take some LSD in order to find the meaning... good luck and good journey! :P
@meowkie try not to see ballet as a form of art with norms which should be followed only for attaining "beauty", but as a medium of free artistic expression through body movements... do you know the meaning of this music? it is about man in it's most natural, essential emotional state. once you understand stravinsky's vision, the choreography will make sense
@Skhikkhi0 I most certainly understand this piece, I've studied it for years now and I've seen hundreds of different interpretations of it through dance and sound. I hear and respect your opinions and interpretations of this particular choreography! :) Personally, I just *don't* think this looks....natural. It's expertly performed, it just cracks me up because it looks so bizarre! I'm more taken with acts that reflect Nijinsky's portrayal of raw emotion and primitive story-telling. :)
@Skhikkhi0 In any case, I've seen this entire ballet, and I do like the remaining few parts. I wasn't a big fan of the Sacrificial Dance, but I really enjoyed most of the other movements. This, to me, is just an awkward way to captivate an audience for the remaining half hour or so of the show, hahaha...I think the rest of this piece is really interesting though!
if I didn't know anything about the story of this ballet I would say the dance depicted the birth of man-primitive,fully formed. The visual impact is rather stunning
@Sunagan It almost appears as if the choreographer is satirizing Stravinsky's music. (And I've always enjoyed this music.) I'm a critic of many things that Disney did, but his take on this music in "Fantasia" is much more appealing than this "choreography."
I like this beginning; leaving the Introduction to Part I blank always seemed silly to me, but why oh why did the choreographer decide against using the naturally jarring rhythms in the Dance of the Adolescents? It's so strong; not using it muddies the music. And that section sounds so good on this recording...
What incredible insight into the human psyche you must possess, fredserpente. The comment to view ratio on ballet performances are extremely low already, there is no need for your graffiti style stereotypifications. There is no connection between homo eroticism in art and homosexuality. I'd recommend auto sexuality for yourself however. In that manner: gfy.
So that's what they're doing? Being primitive?? And the other version, the Nijiski or something like that, isn't it also primitive? I don't know, I just began my obsession with this like a week ago.
yes the original choreography was supposed to be primitive, to me it was just really ancient tribal, while this is like... cave man, like really primitive. lol.
mostly because of the beginning when they use their hands and posture and it looks kind of... monkeyish. haha. and also their costumes are like they're practically nude, whereas the original choreography includes full tribal costumes.
i don't know either, that's just my interpretation.
are there no women in this version? Kinda interesting with using only male dancers? There was a moment where it was almost like the rumble from West Side Story.
this looks soooo awesome on mute XD
dschinni 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Em 1997, uma garota chamada Lauren estava caminhando em uma floresta, e de repente desapareceu, ninguém nunca encontrou-a até 2000, quando uma outra menina chamada Maria encontrou o corpo e marcas em seu peito, disseram: Não era bonita o suficiente "e, agora, você leu isso, ela aparecerá em seu espelho dizendo que você não é bonito o suficiente e matá-lo! (pela forma como o menina chamada Mary morreu pouco depois) Para se salvar colar este para 5 outros vídeos é verda
trunks7092 1 month ago
Well, the music and choreography are meant to evoke a sense of primitivism and exoticism, so based on the other comments it has clearly done what it set out to do. Right. On.
spinlizzer 1 month ago
Copland and Cage have been trying to copy Stravinsky ever since ... Fortunately, it didn't work!
Kuplungmaster 2 months ago
What's that?!
LaWolenka 3 months ago
Ok! You can't immagine how it is now! The choreography ad evolved so much! And the dancers! Just try to see it for real! On stage! You gonna cry it's so amazing!!!
MegaTulka 3 months ago 2
The original by Nijinsky is vastly superior.
chindertitan 4 months ago
@chindertitan absolutely!
Kuplungmaster 2 months ago
I can see why there were riots. Not that i don't lik it. It just makes me feel so weird :P Its scary.
stickininmyeye93 4 months ago 2
I like trains.
spivotz 4 months ago
psytraaaaaaance
AZADboxer 4 months ago
@7:02 hahahahhahahahahahahha! overkill!!!
Guckguckmann 4 months ago in playlist ART
gold. danke!
gnalidna 5 months ago
not savage enough for my tastes :)
teoscar1988 7 months ago 2
7:00 - 7:12 Nothing can beat it!
DawnOfTheIconoclast 8 months ago
Simply amazing!!
fabiopalma 8 months ago
A lot has happened in music, dance and history since 1913. The reconstructed Nijinsky choreography looks 'interesting' but a dated sedate pageant all taking itself too earnestly. There is more direct power here
Saiaton 9 months ago
Is this Nijinsky's original choreography?
hwales1 9 months ago
@hwales1 No, I don't believe... Béjart modified the choregraphy.
SynxLayla 9 months ago
The best visualization of pure Art I ever seen
ajacoub 9 months ago 2
3:35 - the true birth of the Thriller dance!
dormi87 9 months ago
fun fact: this was charlie parker's favorite piece...
HH444 10 months ago
wow, this is not a good version...
sinky101 10 months ago
Kunst gefällt nicht jedem - aber ich finds gut!
@ reinforce11: in youtube gibt es soviel bull shit - das hier gehört nicht dazu!
stockerpel 1 year ago
OK, if you don't like this one, go see the Joffrey reconstruction of the 1913 Nijinsky production. It's way different. Way good! It's here in YT.
TuboEspectador 1 year ago
was ein kranker bulls hit
reinforce111 1 year ago
Saw a rendering of this ballet a couple of weeks ago in Stockholm. I just loved it! One of the best pieces of modern dance I've ever seen!
husu1 1 year ago
I think it's awesome. Look at how they are moving their bodies which is what dance is about and Béjart is a brilliant choreographer. It's sexy. I love it.
cherielouisecouncil 1 year ago
@321sebastian123 what was so funny about that?
MrNocco 1 year ago
haha this video is so funny i laughed so hard at 3:00 till 5:40 x)
Ginniej 1 year ago 2
same with 3:17. It looks like an "ancient ritual" alright!
AnAmericanComposer 1 year ago
@321sebastian123 OMG!
AnAmericanComposer 1 year ago
this is so peculiar
DDS1906 1 year ago 2
I'm trying with EVERYTHING I have to take this choreography seriously... I feel like the only one who can't. :( I'm sorry!
meowkie 1 year ago 44
@meowkie so don't take it seriously.
octavianmihailescu 1 year ago
@meowkie I actually find this to be the best choreography out of the three versions I've seen.
OriginalBasaliskos 11 months ago
@OriginalBasaliskos Oh, it's REALLY incredible! But I think someone was bound to get a kick out of it sooner or later.
meowkie 11 months ago
@meowkie I was having the same problems but in my researches i found out that you need to take some LSD in order to find the meaning... good luck and good journey! :P
jakadatuwo 8 months ago 10
@meowkie try not to see ballet as a form of art with norms which should be followed only for attaining "beauty", but as a medium of free artistic expression through body movements... do you know the meaning of this music? it is about man in it's most natural, essential emotional state. once you understand stravinsky's vision, the choreography will make sense
Skhikkhi0 7 months ago
@Skhikkhi0 I most certainly understand this piece, I've studied it for years now and I've seen hundreds of different interpretations of it through dance and sound. I hear and respect your opinions and interpretations of this particular choreography! :) Personally, I just *don't* think this looks....natural. It's expertly performed, it just cracks me up because it looks so bizarre! I'm more taken with acts that reflect Nijinsky's portrayal of raw emotion and primitive story-telling. :)
meowkie 7 months ago 2
@Skhikkhi0 In any case, I've seen this entire ballet, and I do like the remaining few parts. I wasn't a big fan of the Sacrificial Dance, but I really enjoyed most of the other movements. This, to me, is just an awkward way to captivate an audience for the remaining half hour or so of the show, hahaha...I think the rest of this piece is really interesting though!
meowkie 7 months ago
@321sebastian123 I entierly agreee
bandjaming 1 year ago
Le son est décalé.. :s
Merci qd même :)
Onogma 1 year ago
How can I get a DVD of this. To AUSTRALIA.?
Went to Bejart site, no luck. How did you get hold of this please Kalla31?
goudge3 1 year ago
Really broadens the scope of the original ballet, or rather abandons it. But very coherent.
20emesiecle 1 year ago
Disney tried...but the mouse can't touch this. AMAZING bit of CHOREOGRAPHY!!! ROCK on Igor!!
freakylittlegnome 1 year ago
I really enjoyed it!
(Although, one must admit that it's like a gay acid trip.)
druidmechanics 2 years ago 2
@druidmechanics because its the 70s ;)
deathplayer16 1 year ago
who is the conductor?
hypsophilus 2 years ago
if I didn't know anything about the story of this ballet I would say the dance depicted the birth of man-primitive,fully formed. The visual impact is rather stunning
vaughangarrick 2 years ago
Birth of hip hop at 6:36.
prolelicious 2 years ago
don't mock Stravinsky's holy sacre :P It's brilliant music, though this orchestra is not that good ...
Sunagan 2 years ago
@Sunagan It almost appears as if the choreographer is satirizing Stravinsky's music. (And I've always enjoyed this music.) I'm a critic of many things that Disney did, but his take on this music in "Fantasia" is much more appealing than this "choreography."
davehshs 1 year ago
nice exercise is this yoga ?
kattaerumbu 2 years ago
Yeah, it doesn't look like they're really dancing, it only looks like they are hopping while doing yoga.
horcruxkiller 2 years ago
i love it
rubensanchez008 2 years ago
This is WONDERFUL!!!! I love it...
Jack, from Brazil...
mensageiradaluz 2 years ago
sorry if this was posted already, but who is the orchestra playing this? I'm guessing its a French orchestra? the bassoon sounds terrible!
brutusbassoon 2 years ago
It's also a 1970 recording.
Opus626 2 years ago
I like this beginning; leaving the Introduction to Part I blank always seemed silly to me, but why oh why did the choreographer decide against using the naturally jarring rhythms in the Dance of the Adolescents? It's so strong; not using it muddies the music. And that section sounds so good on this recording...
Brackinese 2 years ago
I agree, it doesn't seem to fit...
KamrusepasRose 2 years ago
que impresionante, gracias por el video!
mrparts 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This borders on blasphemy.
biotonk 2 years ago
Yeah, it's great...
KJHovgaard 2 years ago
What incredible insight into the human psyche you must possess, fredserpente. The comment to view ratio on ballet performances are extremely low already, there is no need for your graffiti style stereotypifications. There is no connection between homo eroticism in art and homosexuality. I'd recommend auto sexuality for yourself however. In that manner: gfy.
RationalEmotive 2 years ago
It was a joke!
fredserpente 2 years ago
just for the lulz, eh. I see you are Italian, get rid of this Berlusconi like mocking of minorities.
RationalEmotive 2 years ago
love the seventies hair dos! Wonder what they're all doing now.
MissySafia 2 years ago
c'est étonnant!
sorjb 2 years ago
thank you for posting this great masterpiece!!!!!
tractotus 2 years ago 2
i kinda like the original dance better. Though it is an interesting modern take upon the dance
floridadude47 2 years ago
3:03-03:40 is so funny xD
I like this music!
youandmet0gether 2 years ago
Bejart is a genius and the dancers incredible.
robertcouturier 2 years ago
3:21 funny part !
geo1208 2 years ago
This is awesome!
murphy456 2 years ago
fagotto sounds like a cross between a viola and a sax!!!
south0park04ever1 2 years ago 2
I know! Immediately I noticed the same thing.
nolanrobe 2 years ago
oh my god!
this is amazing!
i'm on shock!
they brought it right back to real primitivism, there's so much conceptual detail which is demonstrated through the dancing extraordinarily!
favourite.
yanpan16 3 years ago 2
So that's what they're doing? Being primitive?? And the other version, the Nijiski or something like that, isn't it also primitive? I don't know, I just began my obsession with this like a week ago.
Augusto210 3 years ago
oh.. ermm...
yes the original choreography was supposed to be primitive, to me it was just really ancient tribal, while this is like... cave man, like really primitive. lol.
mostly because of the beginning when they use their hands and posture and it looks kind of... monkeyish. haha. and also their costumes are like they're practically nude, whereas the original choreography includes full tribal costumes.
i don't know either, that's just my interpretation.
=]
yanpan16 3 years ago
watch bausch's work, to have another idea
entrelesheures 2 years ago
i did watch bausch's choreography.
it was incredible!
so many amazing interpretations of this piece, we are so lucky to be able to see this on youtube.
yanpan16 2 years ago
why did my comment get two thumbs down?? i only said positive things...
:S
yanpan16 2 years ago
grazie!!!
francescoviespro 3 years ago
RESPECT for that orchestra!
south0park04ever1 3 years ago 2
Thank you for sharing it...So nice!
"harrietamidala1691" i too thought of the same, why weren't no women in it...
mzmquill 3 years ago
This reminds me of a William Shattner fight scene.
SqueakyProductions 3 years ago 20
are there no women in this version? Kinda interesting with using only male dancers? There was a moment where it was almost like the rumble from West Side Story.
harrietamidala1691 3 years ago
the first part is men only. then the women have their moment.
jtrouveroy 3 years ago
Wow! This is intense!!! Great talent too!
...and, uh, I must say, I'm liking these male dancers
In all seriousness though, I've always liked the Rite of Spring, and still when I watch this I am in awe as if experiencing it for the first time.
xpersonx 3 years ago
In credible piece of music! Who can invent stuff like this?!!
AnthonyBlunt 3 years ago 2
thanx for sharing
sjohnsjakie 4 years ago