Very impressive, but not quite out of the valley yet. Everytime she closes her mouth it stretches and moves in an unnatural way that's rather unnerving. Also, the texture of her skin just seems... off. Aside from that though, it really is quite amazing. It's interesting to see how advanced computer animation is becoming.
Ummm. "Real Emily" at the end of the video looks just like the CGI Emily throughout this video. I was expecting to see that the actor/actress looked entirely different to the CGI lady seated in the chair, but I could not see any difference. And the monster faces part didn't look much better than the Video Mask function that came with my Logitech webcam.
@djkerton they're not monster faces lol they are maps(diffuse to show main color, specular is a grayscale map to show where highlights and light bounces)
it would be more impressive it it wasn't a forced performance from a video source. When they can make a 3D character perform from, say, typed text, or from a source that isn't the actual actor being portrayed, that will be something to behold.
Would have been significantly more convincing if the CGI face was different to the actress'. Otherwise on it's (apolgies for the pun) face value, some folks could easily dismiss it as a flea circus.
holy shit, i didnt even notice that the women was fake, i watched this video on a diff site, so i didnt see the description so i got to be shocked at the end :D
The best way to compare is in 720, full screen. Pause, compare 0:25 to 1:23. The angles of the head are relatively close. The difference mostly comes down to the shading. Her forehead is almost just one color in the CG version, and the shadow her nose casts on the left side of her face is gone, too. Also, the mouth just didn't look right to me. Amazing stuff, though.
All they really need much improvement on yet are the eyes. I think this is a superimposed CGI face - it looks almost like the has 2 sets of eyes if you're not looking directly at them. It's like her "real" eyes are "blurred" beneath the CGI superimposition.
Very good work just the same. "New benchmark", as someone else said. :-)
Watch it in 720p and in full screen - looks real to me. Perhaps the skin is a tad too smooth but this is the current benchmark for CGI faces. The personality of the real Emily is recreated by the CGI model - that's the great achievement. People can argue about the mouth but the essence of the real Emily is captured. :)
I don't think the recent trailer for the CGI Tintin film showed anything this real.
@WarlordFred2010 you need to replace "you", with "me" and "i" in your comments...i noticed immediately that she was cg...im not saying it didnt fool other people...and im certainly not saying its not very close to being realistic...just not close enough to fool me
@longfootbuddy I'm saying you're not that observant. You were already told she would be CG before the video started, not explicitly, but there was no reason for you to think she was real, because it's a video about realistic CG.
If you were video chatting, however, and you expected her to be real, you wouldn't be asking "Are you CG?". You wouldn't be thinking about CG, you would be thinking about the conversation.
anyway... it dont work if the movie its a piece of crap... like batlle of la, wasted technology.. maybe they should work more on human stories.. to apply this even in a videogame, with emotional feedbacks, but nooo... all the 99 % of movies and games consist in kill everibody.. and you still wonder why this kids go insane and shoot their pals in the schools,
Interesting, something I just noticed. The eyes move like eyes do, but there's no way to mimic how the iris reacts to subtle differences in position; anyone who's been in a staring contest has seen when someone shifts their focus - it's like this twitch in the other person's eye that you just know is there. You can't replicate something that subtle with wireframe. It's like what jsymons1985 said with muscle/skin interaction
Still looks fake, but I suppose this is 3 years old, so they must have gotten better. BTW, all the fakeness I see is in the mouth, although the coloration is weird too.
Dear Image Metrics, observe 0:13... the mouth moves by resizing the wireframe, the problem with this is that real skin never resizes (so smoothly, anyway), only the muscles change size (they also change their topological features when they contract and relax), and skin stretches or scrunches on top of the muscles (also changing topology). In other words, you will have to model the dynamics of muscular/dermal interaction rather than just shifting surface wireframes.
Dear Image Metrics, observe from 2:15 to 2:17 (also 1:31)... the mouth moves by resizing the wireframe, the problem with this is that real skin never resizes (so smoothly, anyway), only the muscles change size (they also change their topological features when they contract and relax), and skin stretches or scrunches on top of the muscles (also changing topology). In other words, you will have to model the dynamics of muscular/dermal interaction rather than just shifting surface wireframes.
when I didn't know what I was looking at I thought something about her seemed off, but I have to admit I was fooled for a split second, I don't think it was the motion that was the problem. I think it was the lighting texturing and shadowing that messed things up. all though near the end there was some bad eye motion that looked very wrong.
They only paid attention to the face. When you clench or unclench your jaw, temporal muscles contract and expand. That isn't happening here. That and the cheek muscles and forehead aren't doing what they normally do. And they eyes, they never get the eyes right. But it's still pretty good. I probably would've been fooled if I hadn't paid close attention.
yes but game developers only develop games now a days specifically for xbox 360 and ps3 and port them later to the PC. We're stuck with shitty 2005 graphics until the next generation of consoles.
@Windows7kicksass yeah I think that's just how the actual acctress looked. everyone moves their mouth in different ways when they talk ... she seems to have this awkward side smile
Like moths to a flame technology is increasingly trying to achieve a frighting new reality. If something like this becomes perfected video evidence of any event may no longer be considered a viable means of proof. Events may one day be easily fabricated. But Conspiracy theory fears aside this is Awesome...
@midnightXpixie I think the same... what happens with real humans? Maybe someday we will not be able to distinguish robots & real humans and in my opinion that's worse than the uncanny valley:P I don't understand why do we need robots that look like people... are we replacing ourselves or what? Those robots are pretty impressive, but I don't think they are necessary:/
@RosySuperBeatleFan Because some of us would prefer to be in far more control of "human" interaction than is currently possible and palatable. There will come a time when we will get to choose exactly the types of "people" interact with, and whether or not they are artificial or organic. I can think of many reasons for this being a positive, none of which I will list here, for many reasons.
the format is immediately suspicious of course so it gets greater scrutiny. for me it was subtleties in the mouth that gave it away. probably a bit in the eyes too. skin is probably a bit too CG matte too.
but very good. best I've seen.
does it work as well on other faces that the actor's own?
would be cool to see some TNG fan fiction use this to revive the cast : )
@DanFrederiksen the mouth is what tipped me off too, the eyes as well.... regardless that was awesome...... can't wait till video games can pull this off smoothly.....
Its stunning piece of work, but you have to realize everything else besides the face, is real. Basically the CGI face was imposed onto a real human backdrop.
I agree with most of the comments. i idea to make it better is that rather than using a black charkol face as the fun way of revealing that she is actually a computer generated person. i thought it would have been cooler for her to transform into other things like open her face like a door and look inside her brain and see like a window into a fantasy world or maybe all her skin eyes and hair change colors.
Amazing. Even knowing that this is a CGI face doesn't diminish the fact that it looks 100% real to me. Perhaps a bit too red, but still, 95% realistic.
its 100% the mouth that gives it away, due to the amount of muscles we use just to smile and make our mouth move it is very difficult to map that perfectly, watch it again and just stare at her mouth, occasionally it will look to big or slightly in the wrong position, but thats just being picky its still brilliant work.
I think what really gave it away were not the eyes but her mouth. It moved like she had something in it, don't know...but....I can't even complain, it's an amazing job, absolutely oustanding
probably the most realistique CG face in the world ^^ but it's just a complete scan with reflex camera and polarized filter with light, not a face made start from the scratch.
her face seems seems slanted. I could tell it was cgi from the get-go, but this shit is good, im hoping that in couple years like 3, this will be considered blah for video games, unless 2012 comes and fucks us all.
Wow I only realised halfway through that that was the actual CGI character. I thought they were going to have like a comparison between the actor and the character, then when I saw the wireframes and specular maps superimposed on her face I did a double-take.
This is fucking incredible.
Actually looking back you can see the clothing gives it away slightly. If you look closely the fabric deforms in a slightly strange way.
yes, the eyes are not that real, but look at the skin, facial expressions and even hair! everything is made not to be that perfect, just real! technology is getting so amazing each day
Thumbs up if you got here through TV Tropes!
GallifreyanGallade 3 days ago
thats too good
TagTechable 1 week ago
omg thats cg emily
how the hell....
TagTechable 1 week ago
The lips are wonky, the cheeks need more movement, and the eyes sometimes creeped me out .___.
tompiswobblez 1 month ago in playlist Más videos de spooniep
the humour/comedy on this video is so boring that it makes the whole thing look stupid.
raiskaansuthalolla 2 months ago
I wonder what happens if she looks at the camera? It must look pretty bad (otherwise they wouldn't have avoided it.)
finnw1 3 months ago
Very impressive, but not quite out of the valley yet. Everytime she closes her mouth it stretches and moves in an unnatural way that's rather unnerving. Also, the texture of her skin just seems... off. Aside from that though, it really is quite amazing. It's interesting to see how advanced computer animation is becoming.
Cutelilteen 3 months ago
needs more work, but my has technology grown.
XioXaio12 3 months ago
I'm willing to bet it's not animation but facial capture, similar to LA Noire.
unrealeck 3 months ago
Cheek's tipped me off, no movement near the eyes. Other than that bloody amazing
TimedropStudios 3 months ago
Wait was that lady an animation?
69sico96 3 months ago
@69sico96 Yep
dissident93 2 weeks ago
whoooa, scary!!!
ka06059 4 months ago
If you can't tell that's a 3d model, I have bad news for you. Mainly that you're a retarded fuck.
F3tusRape 4 months ago
well dammit i fell in love with a computer generated image.
JSasRays 4 months ago
Ummm. "Real Emily" at the end of the video looks just like the CGI Emily throughout this video. I was expecting to see that the actor/actress looked entirely different to the CGI lady seated in the chair, but I could not see any difference. And the monster faces part didn't look much better than the Video Mask function that came with my Logitech webcam.
djkerton 5 months ago
@djkerton they're not monster faces lol they are maps(diffuse to show main color, specular is a grayscale map to show where highlights and light bounces)
quattrocities 4 months ago
the lips and the area around the eyes is off, but thats all pretty minor
Subalpine602 5 months ago
it would be more impressive it it wasn't a forced performance from a video source. When they can make a 3D character perform from, say, typed text, or from a source that isn't the actual actor being portrayed, that will be something to behold.
DarienCaldwell 5 months ago
Would have been significantly more convincing if the CGI face was different to the actress'. Otherwise on it's (apolgies for the pun) face value, some folks could easily dismiss it as a flea circus.
Arkesus 5 months ago
holy shit, i didnt even notice that the women was fake, i watched this video on a diff site, so i didnt see the description so i got to be shocked at the end :D
cabot2jville2010 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
look at my channel for a sexy CG Animation! :D
Eragons83 6 months ago
The hair looks perfect, but
her skin is uber smooth
the subsurface scattering is too strong (EVERYONE does it too strong)
her face is too red compared to the rest of her.
other than that, this is absolutely amazing.
stupidrainbo 6 months ago
she did not look real to me. the colours were all wrong.
jojoharris69 6 months ago
her face is too red
turgore 6 months ago
Oh god. Well that's gonna give me nightmares.
tahunu 6 months ago
0:14 - 0:15 - lol!
WolfPawDragonClaw 7 months ago
The best way to compare is in 720, full screen. Pause, compare 0:25 to 1:23. The angles of the head are relatively close. The difference mostly comes down to the shading. Her forehead is almost just one color in the CG version, and the shadow her nose casts on the left side of her face is gone, too. Also, the mouth just didn't look right to me. Amazing stuff, though.
ThinkShink 7 months ago
Waow, one of the most impressive CG i ever seen.
I love how she moves her hands from 0:21 to 0:40 It just looks fucking real !
dimebagplan 7 months ago
AHHHH!! 1:25
loper324 7 months ago
All they really need much improvement on yet are the eyes. I think this is a superimposed CGI face - it looks almost like the has 2 sets of eyes if you're not looking directly at them. It's like her "real" eyes are "blurred" beneath the CGI superimposition.
Very good work just the same. "New benchmark", as someone else said. :-)
OldKingSol 7 months ago
Mouth isn't quite right, but the whole thing is pretty good.
KaitainCPS 7 months ago
Watch it in 720p and in full screen - looks real to me. Perhaps the skin is a tad too smooth but this is the current benchmark for CGI faces. The personality of the real Emily is recreated by the CGI model - that's the great achievement. People can argue about the mouth but the essence of the real Emily is captured. :)
I don't think the recent trailer for the CGI Tintin film showed anything this real.
tubeman123100 7 months ago
The teeth of computer people!
xbox3606 7 months ago
immediately i thought she looked like a cg girl
longfootbuddy 7 months ago
@longfootbuddy Because you were expecting a CG girl. If you weren't even thinking about CG, you would think she was real.
WarlordFred2010 7 months ago
@WarlordFred2010 nope
longfootbuddy 7 months ago
@longfootbuddy She's far enough out of the uncanny valley for you to notice nothing. She looks like she has heavy makeup on, not like she's plastic.
WarlordFred2010 6 months ago
@WarlordFred2010 you need to replace "you", with "me" and "i" in your comments...i noticed immediately that she was cg...im not saying it didnt fool other people...and im certainly not saying its not very close to being realistic...just not close enough to fool me
longfootbuddy 6 months ago
@longfootbuddy I'm saying you're not that observant. You were already told she would be CG before the video started, not explicitly, but there was no reason for you to think she was real, because it's a video about realistic CG.
If you were video chatting, however, and you expected her to be real, you wouldn't be asking "Are you CG?". You wouldn't be thinking about CG, you would be thinking about the conversation.
WarlordFred2010 6 months ago
@WarlordFred2010 dream on idiot...stop projecting your lack of observation on me
longfootbuddy 6 months ago
Wait...that's CGI? *cries*
hotelmario510 8 months ago
Thats how they produced most of the Bin Laden stuff over the years.
Duphe 8 months ago 36
@Duphe Not even. they used real actors. hell... they look very similar to each other anyway.
turgore 6 months ago
Honestly, this isn't as creepy as the TV Tropes article brought me to expect.
Well, until 1:18. That was disturbing.
The skin appears a bit off after close inspection, but if you didn't tell me beforehand that this was CG, I'd mostly be fooled.
Everyone is mentioning the mouth being rather off, but I don't see it.
null1023 9 months ago
Oh hai TV Tropers.
fezmovies 9 months ago 17
anyway... it dont work if the movie its a piece of crap... like batlle of la, wasted technology.. maybe they should work more on human stories.. to apply this even in a videogame, with emotional feedbacks, but nooo... all the 99 % of movies and games consist in kill everibody.. and you still wonder why this kids go insane and shoot their pals in the schools,
marcosvelarde83 9 months ago
Anyone seen the film Looker? (1981) Well, it's now come true!!
agfagaevart 9 months ago
The main issue I see it that the lips are slightly slanted on the face, they need some repositioning.
TheCrimsionFlash 9 months ago
This is the same program they used to fake Osama Bin Ladin fake meeting
that they said he was talking about his plan to hit the two towers in New York city!
This software must be a Zionist product !!
for they are well known to cause trouble and then claim it on Muslims!
extremelypolite 9 months ago
@extremelypolite remenber, military science are 50 years way ahead of civil science... black mesa stuff...
marcosvelarde83 9 months ago
I saw her lips reshape unnaturally just after the 10 second mark, when she says films. Otherwise this is probably as advanced as I'v seen.
BassFXero 9 months ago
Interesting, something I just noticed. The eyes move like eyes do, but there's no way to mimic how the iris reacts to subtle differences in position; anyone who's been in a staring contest has seen when someone shifts their focus - it's like this twitch in the other person's eye that you just know is there. You can't replicate something that subtle with wireframe. It's like what jsymons1985 said with muscle/skin interaction
raekuul 10 months ago
its weird i knew something was wrong witrh her face, just didnt know what
xTheDeathSaintx 10 months ago
Still looks fake, but I suppose this is 3 years old, so they must have gotten better. BTW, all the fakeness I see is in the mouth, although the coloration is weird too.
Christhefireshark 10 months ago
The human eye can tell. I can't say what exactly does it... it just does.
GeneralThornton 11 months ago
Dear Image Metrics, observe 0:13... the mouth moves by resizing the wireframe, the problem with this is that real skin never resizes (so smoothly, anyway), only the muscles change size (they also change their topological features when they contract and relax), and skin stretches or scrunches on top of the muscles (also changing topology). In other words, you will have to model the dynamics of muscular/dermal interaction rather than just shifting surface wireframes.
jsymons1985 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear Image Metrics, observe from 2:15 to 2:17 (also 1:31)... the mouth moves by resizing the wireframe, the problem with this is that real skin never resizes (so smoothly, anyway), only the muscles change size (they also change their topological features when they contract and relax), and skin stretches or scrunches on top of the muscles (also changing topology). In other words, you will have to model the dynamics of muscular/dermal interaction rather than just shifting surface wireframes.
jsymons1985 11 months ago
Very nice animation
MrNeksound 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Transhumans are coming soon.
TourettesSomething 1 year ago
Cyborgs are here... how many of you are able to live nowadays without being attached to their smartphone?
xfavio 1 year ago
Cyborgs cooming soon
ivanbura1 1 year ago
Cyborgs are near
ivanbura1 1 year ago
when I didn't know what I was looking at I thought something about her seemed off, but I have to admit I was fooled for a split second, I don't think it was the motion that was the problem. I think it was the lighting texturing and shadowing that messed things up. all though near the end there was some bad eye motion that looked very wrong.
AnimatedSteve 1 year ago
lol at what the mouth does @ 0:14
ShadowWalkerbg 1 year ago
I don't care what you guys think. This is fucking awesome.
RavenSymone223 1 year ago 4
her face is too... i dunno... its like her eyes and teeth are way too shiny
fantasyfreak089 1 year ago
They only paid attention to the face. When you clench or unclench your jaw, temporal muscles contract and expand. That isn't happening here. That and the cheek muscles and forehead aren't doing what they normally do. And they eyes, they never get the eyes right. But it's still pretty good. I probably would've been fooled if I hadn't paid close attention.
Cassavius 1 year ago
Comment removed
Cassavius 1 year ago
i can see its fake couse of the mouth. We cant mimic it perfectly yet.
Lancemaker 1 year ago
This better be what Xbox 720 graphics will be like.
StateCCM 1 year ago
@StateCCM only PC graphics can pull that kind of detail
daswada9 1 year ago
@daswada9
yes but game developers only develop games now a days specifically for xbox 360 and ps3 and port them later to the PC. We're stuck with shitty 2005 graphics until the next generation of consoles.
StateCCM 1 year ago
@StateCCM My only hope is for Crytek : /
daswada9 1 year ago
@daswada9
Crysis 2 will have worse graphics because its going to be designed to run on consoles :(
StateCCM 1 year ago 3
@StateCCM yes :(
daswada9 1 year ago
put this exact level of graffix in video games!!!
MultiFrank777 1 year ago
ITT: people who think they are experts because they knew it was CGI before it started playing
I3L4NK 1 year ago
looks like a lizard person
gk3og 1 year ago
@gk3og Reptillian?
Lionheart1188 1 year ago
WOW! I didn't realize that it wasn't an actual person until they showed the "real emily" Thats some tech.
vosguild 1 year ago
Her lips were a little "stretched" looking, but other wise, that was amazing!
Windows7kicksass 1 year ago
@Windows7kicksass yeah I think that's just how the actual acctress looked. everyone moves their mouth in different ways when they talk ... she seems to have this awkward side smile
SSdraken 1 year ago
Lips were too wide at certain points but very very impressive.
jackrandall 1 year ago
the mouth moves strange.
Mockushonesto 1 year ago
@boxcutter916 I understand what you mean.
Her cgi eyes didn't register enough color 'depth', and the highlights/reflectiveness of her eyes seemed to not accurately reflect the environment.
jw130270 1 year ago
Her mouth gave it away. Impressive though.
xalagarf 1 year ago
@tiredofphailspelling
Ah yes, the good ol' days of FMV.
ninjagold 1 year ago
Still uncanny.
desu38 1 year ago
Looks really off. Not very convincing.
ReginaldMaulding 1 year ago
Her teeth are different colors in different scenes
leftyrighty96 1 year ago
Like moths to a flame technology is increasingly trying to achieve a frighting new reality. If something like this becomes perfected video evidence of any event may no longer be considered a viable means of proof. Events may one day be easily fabricated. But Conspiracy theory fears aside this is Awesome...
DanteAtropos 1 year ago
Am I the only one freaked out by this? With such advances in CGI, what happens to real human actors? What happens to real humans?
midnightXpixie 1 year ago
@midnightXpixie We'll transcend the flesh and become thought entities?
Or, in laymans terms, we will be the robots.
MirrorManification 1 year ago
@midnightXpixie
you'll always need a real person to play the role of an actor. it's recreating dead actors which makes this so interesting.
strangelittleman 1 year ago
@midnightXpixie I think the same... what happens with real humans? Maybe someday we will not be able to distinguish robots & real humans and in my opinion that's worse than the uncanny valley:P I don't understand why do we need robots that look like people... are we replacing ourselves or what? Those robots are pretty impressive, but I don't think they are necessary:/
RosySuperBeatleFan 6 months ago
@RosySuperBeatleFan Because some of us would prefer to be in far more control of "human" interaction than is currently possible and palatable. There will come a time when we will get to choose exactly the types of "people" interact with, and whether or not they are artificial or organic. I can think of many reasons for this being a positive, none of which I will list here, for many reasons.
SirAnthonyPassonno 5 months ago
Her mouth is angled weird. It isn't that noticeable until she does her closed-lipped smile
midnightXpixie 1 year ago 2
her mouth
Gmod4ThaWin 1 year ago
You can still tell. It's something either about either the way the head moves, or the eyes--maybe a little bit of both, but definitely the eyes.
CylindricalWhistle 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The eyes definitely give it away.
CylindricalWhistle 1 year ago
Yeah, humans are quite good at recognizing non-human features... Well, at least awaken ones! :)
artepakt 1 year ago
I knew something wasn't quite right....
BaronCreel 1 year ago
Awesome!
mygov 1 year ago
Her lopsided lips tipped me off.
NewAngel4eva 1 year ago 46
@NewAngel4eva ya sure it did, not the fact that it says "cg" in the link you clicked
eventheinnocent 1 year ago
@eventheinnocent
Well, not only that. XD
NewAngel4eva 1 year ago
@NewAngel4eva What if the actresses lips are really lopsided like that in real life?
kevinsmellls 4 months ago
Whoa, dunno about anyone else but that looks really impressive.
TBotAlpha 1 year ago
the format is immediately suspicious of course so it gets greater scrutiny. for me it was subtleties in the mouth that gave it away. probably a bit in the eyes too. skin is probably a bit too CG matte too.
but very good. best I've seen.
does it work as well on other faces that the actor's own?
would be cool to see some TNG fan fiction use this to revive the cast : )
DanFrederiksen 1 year ago
@DanFrederiksen the mouth is what tipped me off too, the eyes as well.... regardless that was awesome...... can't wait till video games can pull this off smoothly.....
slowednthrowed420 1 year ago
Its stunning piece of work, but you have to realize everything else besides the face, is real. Basically the CGI face was imposed onto a real human backdrop.
GorakTheBig 1 year ago
i was having a doubt that it was 3d.... but when i saw the render passes OMG!!!!!!!!!
somoslosbebitos 1 year ago
I agree with most of the comments. i idea to make it better is that rather than using a black charkol face as the fun way of revealing that she is actually a computer generated person. i thought it would have been cooler for her to transform into other things like open her face like a door and look inside her brain and see like a window into a fantasy world or maybe all her skin eyes and hair change colors.
glowguy99 1 year ago
specular is scary :O
gettingup100 1 year ago
Amazing. Even knowing that this is a CGI face doesn't diminish the fact that it looks 100% real to me. Perhaps a bit too red, but still, 95% realistic.
Leprechaunproduction 1 year ago
1:14 pupils went a lil too far there :)
adrianroam95 1 year ago
I can't think of a better way to present this amazing tool. Great!
Mixamo3DAnimation 1 year ago
Still in the uncanny valley. But its a smaller valley every 6 months.
spacecowboy95 1 year ago
its 100% the mouth that gives it away, due to the amount of muscles we use just to smile and make our mouth move it is very difficult to map that perfectly, watch it again and just stare at her mouth, occasionally it will look to big or slightly in the wrong position, but thats just being picky its still brilliant work.
MrRaajness 1 year ago
She blinks too slowly.
Charmolution 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
her face is facing the camera while her head is facing the interviewer
LittleBrittle360 1 year ago
Comment removed
LittleBrittle360 1 year ago
suspected something at the hands. too smooth and had no veins but also i would've just shrugged it off it not for the title.
germ321 1 year ago
her mouth was too slanted. but if the title didnt say it i would not expect it
DonerciHussam 1 year ago
You were all had god dammit. Just admit it.
part2themovie 1 year ago
I think what really gave it away were not the eyes but her mouth. It moved like she had something in it, don't know...but....I can't even complain, it's an amazing job, absolutely oustanding
7610111610510010597 1 year ago
I seriously couldn't tell until the end.
Izayoiaki24 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
ehmpeters 1 year ago
The eyes gave it away for me. CG eyes are always kinda blank and lifeless. But this is still pretty awesome.
misfitjustice 1 year ago
Let me just say... FFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUU....... I wanna play some 2020' games :O
palkers 1 year ago
probably the most realistique CG face in the world ^^ but it's just a complete scan with reflex camera and polarized filter with light, not a face made start from the scratch.
Meteotrance 1 year ago
Pretty nice, athough her mouth slants awkwardly... like it misaligns with the rest of her face at points.
Ninja1Zombie1Master 1 year ago
Her eyes look definitely CGI, the rest of the face is very convincing though.
toxicsnake 1 year ago
her face seems seems slanted. I could tell it was cgi from the get-go, but this shit is good, im hoping that in couple years like 3, this will be considered blah for video games, unless 2012 comes and fucks us all.
LittleBrittle360 1 year ago
God, I want to bang her so bad.
womeniwanttofuck 1 year ago
1.22 MAMMMMMMMY!
afuzzyduck 1 year ago
I watched too many animations to not know it was fake. I knew it from the first second.
roosterdf 1 year ago
I AM STUNNED, when u look at the begging at the CGI Emily and at the end at the Plate (real Emily), u can't really tell the difference
TudyCoolboy 1 year ago
The only bad thing was her skin seemed to perfectly smooth.
GlobalCitizenOne 1 year ago 2
very nice
iceretm 1 year ago
Looked real to me.
ferretyluv 1 year ago
Wow I only realised halfway through that that was the actual CGI character. I thought they were going to have like a comparison between the actor and the character, then when I saw the wireframes and specular maps superimposed on her face I did a double-take.
This is fucking incredible.
Actually looking back you can see the clothing gives it away slightly. If you look closely the fabric deforms in a slightly strange way.
camydoger 1 year ago
how can you say the clothing gives it away when its real?
only the face i reconstructed via cgi, everything else is just a movie
rockonuslagz 1 year ago 15
lolseriously guys there must be some nice men out there i am so lonely
AleseaStokesene38 1 year ago
the real one looks better
TheSenseofTouch 1 year ago
Wow, nice work!
PlayTilTheyBleed 1 year ago
Comment removed
64255246 2 years ago
Halo Reach
johnnylightning258 2 years ago 4
yep
kylejp117 2 years ago
yup
Nick3zz 2 years ago
btw if they gonna keep creating cute chicks like this one only virtualy the will have me on their doors so think twice CGI hahahha:D
OrdinaryHandsome 2 years ago
@coldfusion131 - LOL
sh1t my azz i still dont belive this is actually a software :D
nice girl for a nightout though ;)
OrdinaryHandsome 2 years ago
You can easily see the CG flaws in the face, it doesn't look right, at the end it looks amazing but I believe the CG is taken away.
Benjamin button is still the benchmark and that's the whole head!
IndrasBlade77 2 years ago
@IndrasBlade77 It's still pretty awesome though!
IndrasBlade77 2 years ago
Bengamin button is a movie, this is real time for video games. Avatar is the new benchmark for movies.
jebes909090 2 years ago
wow I agree.
DanielJRiddell 1 year ago
*watches video*
boring
*finally gets around to reading description*
:O
Danman350 2 years ago
fuckin amazing.... and a little scary haha
Spense626 2 years ago
id still bum her
matt121242 2 years ago
5 for the fantastic technology. -1 for calling it 'too real.'
Saerain 2 years ago
they probably used this in avatar
phlexonance 2 years ago
Pretty damn good. Looks like Blair from GG
twilightawakening 2 years ago
Without knowing it was CG I could probably figure it out, her eyes are too... I dunno, glaringly unhuman. But regardless, really awesome work.
BebopMagnum7 2 years ago
Holy Sh*t that just blew my mind. O_O
coldfusion131 2 years ago
It took me half the video to figure out she was CG. It's like a plot twist haha!
selty 2 years ago
All of you are correct, but if you didn't know beforehand that it was a CG image, you would have thought it was real.
gnomeater 2 years ago
the eyes and the mouth at some points still dips in the uncanny valley, but on the whole it's amazing, they still have a long way to go though
samaelmagnus 2 years ago
She does look like something is wrong with her face.
hanshooligan 2 years ago
yes, the eyes are not that real, but look at the skin, facial expressions and even hair! everything is made not to be that perfect, just real! technology is getting so amazing each day
13Tao 2 years ago
Crazy stuff. Someting about her eyes, isn't very real. That's what gave it off to me. Amazing stuff though. :P
boxcutter916 2 years ago 22
@boxcutter916 Yeah man, you're right, something about the eyes.
WesThorburn 1 year ago
What a hot bitch. I want to have sex with her.
gjpuqvrt 2 years ago
Wow, graphix like this make Uncharted look primative.
BoomBoomSticks 2 years ago 4
fuck the playstaion 4, these r xbox 720 shit
szabowatson1 2 years ago
I want a girlfirend, thanks.I'm virgin
perfectsuns 2 years ago
imagine if a future playstation 4 has these kind of graphics! cool.
icyboy771z 2 years ago
WOW, i thought she was real the whole time lol. i soiled myself when i found out.
Corshmell 2 years ago 3
wow...
crazyivan030983 2 years ago
To me, the teeth gave it away.
popson4 2 years ago
pretty good, but the eyes give it away.
chatoXvato