Obama & Ron Paul are 2 opposite candidates, totally! Obama keeps big government (see his motto on "Change"?), propose on raise tax, supports Fed Regulation & Taxation on internet. Ron Paul supports smaller government, abolish unconstitutional taxes, against Fed Reg/Tax on internet. Obama had 2 years experience as Senator & gave excellent lip service through written transcripts. Ron Paul had 20 years exp as Congressman & he spoke from his heart, not written transcript. Wake up, smell the roses.
Just imagine if we had one year where ZERO money went overseas. Imagine that our govt. spent it right here in America on fire fighters, the post office, potholes, teachers, etc. Why is that such a kooky idea?
my ass isreal didnt even exist before WW2 the rest of the none of the europeans wanted any jew neither did america so they dumped them in a honk of land my family used to call home so Go F yourself u jew
I agree with you. Israel sucks. Obama is crap. But I must point out that when Obama was in his state seat he called on Israel to stop their crimes against the Palestinians. He seems to be a pure politician who changes his stance depending on the elctorate.
Actually, Obama takes a more fair and balanced approach towards the players in the middle east. This has gotten him a lot of heat from both sides. He, however, will in the long run have better success in this issue because he does not take sides. America should not take sides. That is part of the reason why the Arab countries are fighting us. We do not have to take on the fights of others. Our involvement should be as neutral facilitators of peace.That is the rold Obama would take. Obama 08!
i agree with you about not getting involved from a philosophic point of view, but we are already involved. We sent, and are sending, weapons from this point on OUR NONINVOLVEMENT WOULD BE TAKING SIDES. We already swung the power scales to one side.
Hey glad someone saved this it is my video and was deleted by youtube
Rys2sense 1 year ago
@Rys2sense *jewtube
oliverAP13 1 year ago
Very interesting. keep it up!
r3dshif7 2 years ago
what happened to ryantheneocons. account suspended i wonder why?
dangflo 2 years ago
aguabo your very smart man RON PAUL!!!
scoobydubby 3 years ago
I do agree we need to get rid of the IRS and greatly reduce spending. We should be spending on the hydrogen highway so we can get off foreign oil.
jeepndesert 3 years ago
gold standard is over-rated and a waste of a natural resource.
jeepndesert 3 years ago
Obama & Ron Paul are 2 opposite candidates, totally! Obama keeps big government (see his motto on "Change"?), propose on raise tax, supports Fed Regulation & Taxation on internet. Ron Paul supports smaller government, abolish unconstitutional taxes, against Fed Reg/Tax on internet. Obama had 2 years experience as Senator & gave excellent lip service through written transcripts. Ron Paul had 20 years exp as Congressman & he spoke from his heart, not written transcript. Wake up, smell the roses.
aguabo 3 years ago 3
Just imagine if we had one year where ZERO money went overseas. Imagine that our govt. spent it right here in America on fire fighters, the post office, potholes, teachers, etc. Why is that such a kooky idea?
RpKingman 3 years ago
you're ignorant. israel doesnt commit terrorism. it faces it.
jhk1987 3 years ago
my ass isreal didnt even exist before WW2 the rest of the none of the europeans wanted any jew neither did america so they dumped them in a honk of land my family used to call home so Go F yourself u jew
ajm83 3 years ago
Dude you messed up right at the beginning. Obama didnt vote against Iraq. He wasnt in Congress at the time. Sorry. Still got Love for the effort.
Veteran for RON PAUL!
Peace,Robert
gunjin22 3 years ago 2
i love the monotone. I love how nobody notices that as events unfold Ron Paul is never wrong.
DCUPtoejuice 3 years ago 5
I agree with you. Israel sucks. Obama is crap. But I must point out that when Obama was in his state seat he called on Israel to stop their crimes against the Palestinians. He seems to be a pure politician who changes his stance depending on the elctorate.
greywolf4744 3 years ago 2
Actually, Obama takes a more fair and balanced approach towards the players in the middle east. This has gotten him a lot of heat from both sides. He, however, will in the long run have better success in this issue because he does not take sides. America should not take sides. That is part of the reason why the Arab countries are fighting us. We do not have to take on the fights of others. Our involvement should be as neutral facilitators of peace.That is the rold Obama would take. Obama 08!
danielngar 3 years ago
i agree with you about not getting involved from a philosophic point of view, but we are already involved. We sent, and are sending, weapons from this point on OUR NONINVOLVEMENT WOULD BE TAKING SIDES. We already swung the power scales to one side.
greywolf4744 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
u suck
BYRON2SEXY 3 years ago
why?
madmaxsdp 3 years ago