I don't know where this man got his story, but he is wrong. Africa was a greek word. As far as the Romans are concerned, the romans had a province in North Africa called Afric. It later became Africa. As far as I know, Kemet is now known as EGYPT. Moorish Israelite is a kind of oxy moronic phrase because most of the moors(Black, Arab, and Berber)were Islamic. It's true that part of the people of Cartadas(Carthage) were from Israel, but after they were kicked out of Kemet for other reasons.
this man is terribly ignorant, whoever posted this video is too. please do NOT take any of what is said in this video as truth. it is a simple fabrication of history designed to justify the beliefs of one man. you don't have to call yourself an african if you don't want to, but please leave documented historical facts alone. (anyone who calls this guy an n***er for making this type of mistake, despite how colossal it is, is also ignorant, people of all races change history for their own means).
@bradlyc79:africa is amazigh name. you dont like amazigh civilisation just becaus we are more white.amazigh history is old africa history.because arfica is libya and it is tamazgha.
and my friend ,jugurtha queitus,septimus,saint augustin and pape victor ,terence the africain(afir) apulee, macrinus are amazighs.like touaregs and king INARUS.
MY FRIEND OLD AFRICA IS AMAZIGH .ALMORAVIDS ARE AMAZIGH TOO JUST LIKE GENERAL TARIK.YOUR FRIEND FOR TIZI OUZOU.
@Afrikanglobal fuck u bitch u get ur scholarship from YouTube videos who gives a fuck what u say read some history books on the subject u dumb nigger!!!!
@wtfjaftw english is not based off of latin, though some of it's words are influenced by it. languages which evolved from latin are known as "romance languages" or "romance tongues" and include spanish, french and portuguese. english is more of an evolution of the saxon and german tongues.
@asteroidmonger you're wrong they are called the latin languages because most of which are based off of latin also arabic was formed by moors or ethiopians as well as writing so the first languages were formed by blacks and later altered alexander pushkin a man of moorish decent which history has painted him as white helped form the russian language
Scipio got the name africanus due to the conquering of Carthage. A great many romans picked up 3rd names due to their prowess as a warrior or in some cases just some distinguishing marks.
Afri was a Latin name used to refer to the Carthaginians who dwelt in North Africa in modern-day Tunisia. Their name is usually connected with Phoenician afar, "dust", but a 1981 hypothesis[6] has asserted that it stems from the Berber word ifri or ifran meaning "cave" and "caves", in reference to cave dwellers.[7] Africa or Ifri or Afer[7] is the name of Banu Ifran from Algeria and Tripolitania (Berber Tribe of Yafran).[8]
@PowerfulOz1@tolldoll100 @ mobfiggak1 ,no it haven't been called africa , the greeks called africa libya and and later the romans called (carthage) tunisia "afri" sicipio was called africanus after he conquered afri ..... just like alot of african countries been renamed after roman and greek names , iraq was called mesopotamia prior and than persia , iran, syria, egypt, ethiopia, somalia, tunisia, mooracco, mauritania, nigeria, sudan, niger
Scippio got the title Africanus after he beat Carthage. They didnt name the continant after him it was already called that. Oh and another thing Hannabal while winning alot of battles against Rome he never conquoered it. He never went to Sicily and Italy was called Italy then too. It just wasnt a country but it was the name of the peninsala.
Shalom .... 1st i wanna give praise to the most high yaweh, 2nd off how about we stand as a people (blackman & woman), go back to africa & demand our own government .... we need our own country,army,politicians,kings&queens, & our own way of life not the ones we have now in america shalom isalam salakem !!!!!! please help spread the message (allthingsnew) 2012
Carthagians were of indoeuropean origins! You know what the problem is, most pseudos think like kids! They equate the word Africa with black just like the racists they claim to oppose. So anyone to them who lives in Africa is automatically black
African history is beautiful and great! Black history is great but it also has it's follies! You won't know the real story if you listen to pseudo-intellectual coons like these moors, Muslims and Israelites. They are childish thinkers
I'm a Ugandan and my tribe are the Baganda and our ethnic group is Bantu. The Bantu occupy most of subsaharan Africa and for most of them, it was geographically isolated. Most Bantu nations developed independently so we are not Egyptians, Ethiops, Jews, moors, etc go to scho get a real educatio. And study real history and science!
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL england and the white people from england had civilised asia and africa, what has india invented when we invented boats and the plane?
@Jimmyretired what!! the egyptians, ethiopians, all had civilizations from 3200 BC, hieroglyphics, building pyramids,irrigation. England wasnt formed until 927AD And didn't even bathe regularly until after the 1500's! do your research
Scipio Africanus was his birth name he was named after his grandfather yet who story was taught to who is a big question why argue with ignorance till ignorance make an attempt to dig deep and research on it's on and I'm not talking google or wiki BLACK MEN OF aMERICA NEED A FOUNDATION AND ITS NOT AMERICAN HISTORY
Wow you people have no idea about history. Like others have stated. He was given, the title Scipio Africanus, AFTER he conquered Africa. My people, don't listen to these ignorant fools.
I hate to see brothers who are ignorant... You don't wanna be called african but you'll accept moorish israelite? Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Man get off tv and and sit down somewhere. Go read a book.
(at 47) "he kept' em there for over 30... 20 years..." Bullshit. Hannibal roamed Italy for 15 years, (it's half of 30), and Scipio was given the agnomen "The Africanus" AFTER he defeated hannibal at the battle of Zama. Usually Romans did that nicknaming with their generals and legions as well, after a famous event. For example Nero Claudius Drusus was named "Germanicus" after several battles won in Germany. Now I don't believe nothing That Virgil guy might say.
in those times roman generals was typically given the sir name of the land mass that they conquered not the other way around see... hannibal by jacob abbott. and we are not talking about the intire contienent just what was carthage which consisted of modern day tunisia, libya, algeria, norther morrocco, north west egypt, corsica, sardinia, southern spain, etc... so alot of false info. and if hannibal was black is not up for debate. that kindergarden stuff. he was!!!!!
africa was already called africa. africa was one of that land mass most ancient name. hannibal had about 40000 troops and they all were not carthagenians. some were but some were namidian (from inner africa) great sling throwers. some wee ever greek, because carthagenians also outsourced their military, but majority were black. i do not deny that. now as far as the nam scipio africanus. his original name was scipio the elder even though he was the son of his father already named scipio.
lies upon lies upon lies..thousands and thousand of years of lies and distortion..africa was originally afrika meaning land of the free. you see no slaves or slave owners...this man is part right.europeans did give the name afrikan but because they saw how the people were truly free to live their own lives.a-free-man later know as afrika or african is what the europeans would call it.not because of some war..but originally blacks did not define them selfs as africans as a country
Scipio Africanus did not pick that name up until after he defeated Hannibal...Africa means the land of the Afer or Ifri( the indigenous blk tribe Hannibal was part of)...Afer- the people ca-means land in the roman dialect...Scipio did not pick up Africanus until he defeated Hannibal...just cos ur older don't mean u kno alot
@mobfiggak1 I'll give you that. Scippio was given that name after defeating Hannibal. Its said that he ordered Carthage salted so that nothing would grow there, spawning from the LONG war with Carthage. As the color of him, Id tell you he was black, or of African descent/man of color. But people of today have so greatly fallen for the bs taught in school, and they hold that as truth. If folks would do the research, theyd know so much more. I dont know it all, but I know more than the average.
@jXXforLIFEagain, According to ancient records , i merely stated FACTS, and i'm NOT your brother, i'm female,(Lewele), i'm an elkekez,(african ) wemen.
@XXYforLIFEagain , The race of black man is a black caucasian-Negro hYbrid, he's NOT elkekez,(african), ancient records confirm that the race of black caucasian man is mankind , ancient documents speak of race of black caucasian mankind, ALL black men are black caucasian-Negro gentiles, their ADAMS seedline; the black man is the Father of white/lightskin, mixedrace, mongoloid hYbrid,cloned Fallen -seed races. The elkekez,(african) wemens race eLe,(eve) is not the same race as Adams sons.
He didn't even state why it was names after Aficanus. It also troubled me that he said that Hannibal conquered all of Italy. These guys are clearly Afro-centric in their beliefs.
ALL the light/whiteskin, mixedrace, mongoloid caucasian races have NO roots on this earth,they have NO connection to this earth, because the back caucasian man grafted /cloned /created these hYbrid races from himself, their his seedline; apparently the race of black caucasian man is the Lunar Cycle man Adam..
311nonono is right. The name Africa as pertaining to the continent of Africa existed long before the Roman general was born. The title he was given, Scipio Africanus, means "conquerer of Africa."
The race of black man are the romans, because the word Roman means Negro, and the word Negro means testis of man, the race of black man are black caucasian hYbrid ADAM sons, their gentiles; and the light/whiteskin, mixed, mongoloid caucasian races are his recently created, black caucasian hYbrid, gentile seedline.
According to ancient records Kelkeke was renamed Africa by the invading black European-Negro- Caucasian race of man ADAM- hYbrid, and his created white/lightskin,mixed, mongoloid caucasian black Negro hYbrid sons, because the race of black man is black caucasian, he's NOT Kelkekez,(african); the letters A. F. R. I. C. A, stand for Adams, testis-rays eye of caucasian Adam.
@draxx77 ,The race of black caucasian man ADAM has been the devil throughout herstory, ancient records confirm that there's a black caucasian devil, who is the root of ALL evil, the white/lightskin, mixedrace, mongoloid caucasoid hYbrid races are his cloned/ made races, they have NOT been around for very long, they have no herstory; ALL the wars throughtout herstory were done by the black caucasian-Negro sons of ADAM race, they raged war against ancient elkekez,(african) wemens race eve(ele).
@marksabatini This is totally wrong, Africa at one point was all black any well studied person will tell you this. All people came from out of Africa and those people were black not Arab, they came way later. Unpigmented people didin't even show up on the earth until 20 to 30,000yrs after the Grimaldi people of Europe and this group of people came from West Africa, this is well documented. Ask any Arab about there history and they will tell you they migrated from the middle east into Africa.
Even if any of what the man just said was true, I'd be honored to have my continent named after a Roman, especially when my people living on said continent have failed to ever achieve anything that rivals a tenth of the greatness of the Roman Republic and Empire.
@EdikShepherd You have no clue of Africa then and I think you are surely not from Africa at all. Africa started everything in Rome, the real romains anyway. Africa had many golden ages and rome had none, please do the reshearch.
@germanyinthehouse North Africa alone had extremely little to no influence in the founding of Rome, which was a small and isolated event on the Tiber River that most of the world probably didn't even know about. The Romans themselves are a mix of what is recorded to be Greek and native Latin blood, not African.
Also, Rome had no golden ages because its entire existence was a golden age. It invented the precursors to plumbings, baths, stadiums, race tracks, and built great structures abroad.
@germanyinthehouse And are you paring sub-saharan Africans with North Africans and Egyptians? The continent may be the same, but the people and cultures are DRASTICALLY different. Africans from Kenya are not the same as Africans from Egypt. They are different in millions of ways.
@tolldoll100 Of course they are. I'm mostly Danish and I have no problem admitting that we never did, nor never will, do anything as great as many Southern European countries.
Excellent point, we shouldnt go by the name given to us by our enemy instead we must name ourselves. Elijah Muhammad didnt have time for all the detail but he called us the black man and women of planet asia.
I'm afraid that's not technically true about the name of the continent called Africa. If you look at an old map you will see the continent did not have 'AFRICA' wrote across it.
Based on one of the oldest maps in Europe and one of the oldest of Africa-it came from a similarly sounding small kingdom in a modern day Arab country. The map is from the old Catalonian kingdom in modern day Spain. Google ''BBC old map of Africa audio slideshow'. I found you the facts so peace be with you.
the wrong history, anibal dont conquer all the italy, he dont atack the italy from cartague but from the cartagenese colony in spain, and by land from spain go to italy. And the roman general only have the name africanus when win the batle in cartago. So the only thing that i have to say is go look in history and stop saying more bullshit. Sorry for my english, is not my native language
WOW...what ignorance ! What stupidity ! And the moderator is nodding like, like the other dumb ass that he is. The general who later became known as Scipio Africanus, was BORN with the name "Publius Cornelius Scipio" Africa was known as Africa to the Latins before Scipio was even born ! Africa was NOT named after Scipio It's the opposite. Scipio's name was changed to Scipio Africanus in honor of his victory. You do an injustice to African Americans everywhere. Just a bunch of dummy racists.
@311interesting, u seem so "SHOCKED" (suggested by the exclamation of "wow")..to the point that u found it necessary to call him "stupid AND ignorant"..which one is it? Surely, u know there is a difference. I personally would like 2thank u 4sharing the knowledge that u clearly found from another source (i presume u did not dig up the original source of ur information..correct?) I never knew this information before & I am NOT stupid just ignorant about said topic JUST AS U WERE B4 U LOOKED it up.
Now, thanks to this man and to YOU (for "tweaking" his information) I now know that Africa was named by white men of Latin origin (prob Roman)...which i quite confidently feel was his original point (Scipio was "white" and so was the "Latin" who named the continent)...even if his "facts" did not line up with what you say is historically accurate. So thank you again for your knowledge...that you read from somewhere else....since you were not actually PRESENT at the naming ceremony nor was he ;-)
@311 Now for some other food 4thought. Surely u are aware the RECORDED HISTORY is heavily biased and much of it if not all is 100% dependent on the transcriber of historical events. I'm also confident in your prior knowledge of the fact that much of the history that was recorded by the conquerors is virtually ALWAYS PARTIAL AGAINST THE VANQUISHED (a common human idiosyncrasy) For example, have you ever heard of eugenics? A pseudo science paraded as FACT by whites to justify slavery&colonization.
@311nonono so if its a fact that recorded history can NEVER be 100% ACCURATE...but must always include some liberties taken here and there and filleed with conjecutre mixed with facts and hypotheses. I am sure the American Revolution is told a bit differently from the two opposing sides...lol. My point is, do you really need to be so hard on a group of people who have had their ENTIRE CULTURE STRIPPED FROM THEM (which includes their LANGUAGE, GOD , FAMILY AND TRUE HISTORY)..
@311nono so if a group of people have been TOTALLY DISCONNECTED from THEIR LINEAGE OF LANGUAGE, ORAL HISTORY, SPIRITUALITY/RELIGION, FAMILY, NORMS, VALUES, ETHICS AND MORES...and brought to a foreign land in the worst possible conditions and were terrorized,oppressed and subjugated for generations upon generations ...is it it really so surprising that some would attempt to try and gain a sense of self- worth even if they are stretching or twisting the "so called" true historical events around??
@311nonono if a person had a horrible childhood that was filled with all sorts of abuses, neglect and other negative experiences...would it be shocking for that person after growing into adulthood to need constant emotional support due to the many insecurities that s/he developed over the tumultuous earlier years of development. Perhaps we should not be so quick to judge the hearts minds and behaviors of others lest we walk a mile in their shoes. Peace and Blessing to you my friend.
I don’t think wow suggests shock. This sort of anti-anything white is no longer shocking. I would have been shocked if it was otherwise.
It’s both ! Ignorant because he does not know the facts(to the best that historian have deciphered) stupid because I also call white racists stupid (I can give you other reasons , but that’s good enough).
On this particular subject, I have not been ignorant of it since I was 12 years old.
@keybobrob What I was ignorant of and I did look up is the origins of the name Africa, and the probability that it comes from a white Latin devil is very low :).
The name’s most likely origins are from the African tribes of North Africa.
So, should I thank him for me looking up the origins of the name Africa. Definitely not.
I will not thank him, but rather credit him for the propagation of a unique African–American brand of racism against all white individuals.
@keybobrob Even if these individuals are new to these shores and even if their ancestors could have been serfs or slaves.
As far as recorded history, it is what it is, and we try (at least those whose interest is the truth) to muddle through what’s available. Even the Egyptian Pharos would sometimes try to remove the existence of a prior from all inscriptions and monuments.
The scourge of slavery in the Americas may not have been possible if it had not already been very active in the Islamic countries of Africa. Active in both the black nations and Arab nations of Africa and the Middle Eastern nations since circa 900AD. They plundered the human resources of Africa for slaves along with the southern coasts of Europe and any ship on the high seas (The US Marine’s anthem attests to this).
@keybobrob The Portuguese and Spanish dipped into this pot of illicit human gold and the Americas partook in the plunder. But whitey does not share the credit, no, he gets all of it. Even if his white ass great great grandmother was a slave to a black Islamic Moor.(yeah, I know not many, it’s just the point).
And the Islamic black Africans and Arabs are absolved and washed squeaky clean (ask Louis Farrakhan).
Now that I have said all this let me just tell you,
you are preaching to the choir.
You ask if I can understand. I think I can. Have I gone through his trials and tribulations, probably not. My concession is that I am a lot harder on white racist, and actually, I tend to ignore black racists.
But I do know the poison that racism is and that goes for both black and white racism.
And spreading and propagation the poison of racism is not excusable or pardonable for anyone be they white or black.
Every man and woman is a product of their experiences. If he lives in a world where everyone nods in agreement when he shoots we “hate black people”. If someone is not “hard on him” and tells him this is not right. How will his experience ever change?, will he not be doomed to his past?
@311no.which is the "truth" ? I don't know about you my friend but I was not around 20,50 or 100 centuries ago...were you. History is absolute...like mathematics....HOWEVER THE TELLING OF HISTORY ....well that is a WHOLE nother story. HIS-STORY(history)...vs. MY- STORY (mystery).
Surely you realize there is countless controversies over the telling of historical events. In fact,, we will never know the truth...until we invent some sort of time machine. The fact is history writer skew things.
Because then even the loony who says slavery in the US never existed, would have a place at the table of history along with Mr. Virgil Jones. (If you don’t like this example make up your own).
The problem with using the above points as the sole basic for supporting Mr. Virgil Jones is that Mr. Virgil Jones was also not there many centuries ago.
But people who wrote down his or their story were.
Archeological artifacts or evidence is explored and researched.
The bias of the teller is taken into account, and that goes double for the bias of he/she who evaluates the teller. (Oh my, pray tell, Mr. Virgil Jones certainly has no bias.)
Historical events are controversial because of the scrutiny of historians and archaeologists alike.
You want more scrutiny? I suggest that Mr. Virgil Jones is a force for anti-scrutiny.
To even suggest equal footing for Mr. Virgil Jones is to debase historians and archaeologists everywhere!
@311nonono, I have read COUNTLESS books in the past 25-30 years my friend...literally hundreds and hundreds of them...(these do not include the many i read as part of my required course work reading during my university years)...I tend to make it my business to use my own PERSONAL walk in life coupled with the virtually endless amount of informaion, insights, perspectives, perceptions, hypothesis, theories, commentaries,..etc.. gathered from the plethora of books i've digested over my life..
@311nonono, and as a part of my gathering of information I also have dialogued with apparent intelligent folk such as urself & have gained insight % perspective over the years. I have learned through my own walk & experiences & I have learned from many others via literature I've read or conversations like this one, or through academics...or whatever. It's very unfortunate that not only the very language we use to communicate can often times NOTeffectively and quickly reflect our inner thoughts
@311nonono we often have to go back and forth just to realize that much of the entire content of the dialog is more in accord than not. In this particular case, in all the countless books i have read not ONE is from Virgil Jones..(perhaps you can show me otherwise..). It's so sad how in the so called "information age" we as a society have been dumbed down...even more. We think the way to gather information is to go to youtube , wikipedia and the like...lol. It's sad. This forum is not the place
@keybobrob I must agree with what you say about this forum.I must question your "countless book" theory.First,while I doubt that Virgil Jones has written anything worth printing;I would suspect that despite the "countless " books you claim to have read, you have not read them all and there are surely MANY authors you do not know.Secondly, you invite someone to "show you otherwise".The question is unclear.Do you expect him to prove that you have read a book BY (not from) Jones or that one exists?
@MuhammadsStillASissy all i know is that a High Capacity Mag can holds more rounds than the standard cap. mag and my 33 round 9 mm Glock mag, as opposed to the bullshit17 round mag furnished w/pistol...is the choice with a semiwadcutter in my AK-47 fuck the full metal jackets ammo...when it comes blowin heads off....AMERICA FUCK YEAH...Im wit you bro!! We will keep dese bastardragheads the fuck out of our land. you and me will hold USA high baby...AMERICA ...FUCK YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!
@keybobrob sounds I wouldn't trust my life to a 9mm even with 33 rounds but that's me. In a gunfight it is hard to fire much on moving targets. That Glock is a GREAT choice and the reliability (along with proper ammo and lots of it) puts it at the top of true Mankilling Work Guns.The A.K. is the top mankiller now although there are better long guns it always works and as long as it kills,; dead is dead.Sub MOI is nice for extreme range or targets but for close up man size killing the AK WORKS!
@311nonono Thank you. You have saved me a long post.What a Moke that monkey is. It looks like anyone can become a BlackHistory expert if they are black and their mothers dress them funny.
@draxx77 African American history starts at the colonisation of Europeans of the Americas, not before... before that it is just African, European and Mediterranean history.
@luciferiexcelsil But African-Americans were African BEFORE the colonization, the American-ness began when we got to America, we never stopped being African, we are African AND American.
@draxx77, ONLY the elkekez(african) wemen taken as slaves to America were elkekez,(african), today ONLY the very few non-miXed african american Wemen are still elkekez,(african), but the black men taken as slaves to America were and are black caucasian hYbrid ADAMS, they were NEVER elkekez,(african).
Wow... Don't they realize that Africanus was a title meaning conqueror of Africa. The name Africa was already used in Latin. Hannibal Barca was certainly not African; he came from a royal family that used to live in Phoenicia. I hate idiots that change history because of this race empowerment crap.
he was not named Africanus, his name was Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Asina... Africanus is a title: it means something like "Conquerer of Africa"... the Latins/Italians called it Africa and english has deep roots in latin... and you get the rest...
Caucasian? Romans were tan skinned dark haired people.....decendants of Mediterranean and Greek and easterners.... the term "Caucasian" didnt even exist back then...hes doing the SAME thing that hes accusing people of doing to him
these Afrocentrists have their own fucked up bias to what everything is. SMH
Everything got its name from something, its Who you are an What you do that matters, not the superficial names......
@RAHAMEEM dude thats bullshit because africa was known as either the land of kamet which also identified egypt or the land of ham which is in the bible people in those days didnt see the what we know as africa as one continent
Black people are so fuckin retarded, first his name was Publius Cornelius Scipio. Africanus was his nickname he acquired in the Punic wars. Second Hannibal never conquered Italy. Third Hannibal was from Carthage a city founded by Caucasians. All of North Africa was Caucasian back then and today it is Arab. Arabs are also considered to be Caucasian. Blacks were hardly involved.
@njdevil281 So tell me how was all of N. Africa caucasian if the ancient Egyptians were Black? The reason why arabs are there now is because of multiple invasion by Hyskos, persian and mongolian nomads. The persians were the last invasion to win rulership of egypt. The caucasians were never indiginous to Egypt. They were the barbaric invaders from the north. They lived in caves during the highlight of black civilizations. That is why Arabs (ancient persians) Over run the country.
@seinfeildsucks LoL, the Ancient Egyptians were never black. A look at their hieroglyphs is proof enough. The Nubians who lived along the Southern Nile were black but the Egyptians were not. Also the Ptolemaic Dynasty which were Greeks ruled Egypt for hundreds of years before and after the Punic Wars. They took over Egypt from the native Egyptians back in the days of Alexander. Egyptian is an ethnic group and they are not and never were black.
@njdevil281 "The Ancient Egyptians were never black" Sure. Either you belive the nazi puesdo science as Egyptians being "White" (Which has been proven a lie), or you believe the story of the jews coming out of captivity from slavery of Egypt. Which ever one. The Egyptians NEVER had slaves. They had indentured servents! Give me proof of that finding. What dynasty? The word "Kmt" means "Land of the blacks
@seinfeildsucks Trying to revise history will never fill your racial insecurities, sorry to disappoint. Where did all of these magical black Egyptians go?? I give you legitimate facts and you give me oral diarrhea.
@njdevil281 first of all bad Joke because if you know any history blacks were chased out of egypt by arabs.the same arabs who enslaved blacks (google meditteranean slave trade), those blacks escaped into the sub saharan region which started the term sub saharan blacks. The sad truth is there is authentic proof showing how whites tried to convince blacks in the america they had no history what so ever.so ask yourself who really proven themselves capable of trying to rewrite history
@smoothcollected Arabs didn't invade Egypt until the fall of the Byzantine Empire you dumb ass. Blacks trying to take credit for Egypt is the most pathetic thing ever. The Byzantine's controlled Egypt since the splitting of Rome. Egyptian is an ethnic group and 90% of the people who live in Egypt today are ethnically Egyptian. Arabs are a small minority. Black Africans live in central and Southern Africa, they hadn't even invented the wheel or a system of writing.
@njdevil281 everything your cracker ass knw about blacks wasnt even taught to you by blacks.....you dont see chinese ppl trying to tell you about russians or greeks or anything like that.....Guess why because know one cares.....white pple are the only race on youtube who surf youtube criticizing other races because no one gives a shit about your history
@smoothcollected I don't need to be taught North African history by blacks, because blacks are from Sub-Suharan Africa. You can look at any Ancient Egyptian hieroglyph and they depict blacks as foreigners. Look at the Cartouche of Tutankhamun, he is standing on conquered blacks. If you went to Egypt and said ancient Egyptians were black, the millions of ethnic Egyptians standing all around you would fucking laugh their asses off.
@njdevil281 and Just because you see a certain amount of non blacks in a region doesnt make it clear cut that there wasnt another race there earlier.....thats like saying south africa didnt start off all black because there are damn near Just as many whites as blacks....when we know thats false..its funny how I can pull up Just as many whites and middle eastners believe what i believe but I bet you cant find any blacks who would even attempt to say what you believe...
@seinfeildsucks In fact the Egyptians and later Arabs had black slaves for centuries. Arabs slave traders called blacks Kaffirs. Do you know who it was who stopped the Arabs from owning black slaves??? It was those evil white colonial powers who made it illegal. You're welcome. In fact it was white people who were the first people in the world to outlaw slavery.
@njdevil281 riddle me this.....even the people you refer to as egyptians did not refer to thmselves as such....so what did they? that name didnt even exist in their mind nor language
@njdevil281 first of all thats bullshit cracker....second of all dick face youll be the laughing stock simply because every one besides blacks knows that white men have no culture and simply try to butt into everyone else's and discredit anyone else...and as far as egyptians being a word used in ancient egypt is simply bullshit and ill advise you to go get reeducated dick face.....youtube the accounts of one Napoleon soldiers and youll understand how insecure your roots are LOL
Why should I listen to you when you can't even spell properly? My roots by the way, go back some 3,500 years of advanced civilization. Rome, Greece, Byzantium, the Empires. Your talking to the people who put men on the moon and invented everything you use in your daily life, including the computer your using to speak to me, your car you drive to get to work (assuming that you do), and the clothes that you wear. Normally I wouldn't go this far but your use of the word cracker compels me to.
@njdevil281 first of all im sure my statments were interpreted the way they needed to be you. Secondly with that being said, you highlighting what was probably a simple error that makes no real indication of my level of intellect is nothing more than you reaching and being desperate. and as far as the computer you speak of look at all the contributors and youll be surprise and feeling dumb. thirdly Ive had several classes regarding inventors and scientist and am willing to go shot for shot.
@njdevil281 and there are plenty of inventions by blacks.air conditioning, traffic lights, real everday shit. but im sure a person like yourself will have many reasons for why thats incorrect.and as far as the computer goes again there are alot of "middle easterners who would dispute that and lets not get on the inventions stolen from the asians that are claimed by your kind..and those that blacks were forced to be sold in the mid 1800's...oh yea i learned that at the university of alabama. lol
(Shaking my head) missed informed
Blind leading the blind. You see no one corrected him.
I love our people but this man needs to shut the "FUCK up".
Nigga got me steaming.
Angie42843 1 month ago
I don't know where this man got his story, but he is wrong. Africa was a greek word. As far as the Romans are concerned, the romans had a province in North Africa called Afric. It later became Africa. As far as I know, Kemet is now known as EGYPT. Moorish Israelite is a kind of oxy moronic phrase because most of the moors(Black, Arab, and Berber)were Islamic. It's true that part of the people of Cartadas(Carthage) were from Israel, but after they were kicked out of Kemet for other reasons.
seadog27able 1 month ago
this man is terribly ignorant, whoever posted this video is too. please do NOT take any of what is said in this video as truth. it is a simple fabrication of history designed to justify the beliefs of one man. you don't have to call yourself an african if you don't want to, but please leave documented historical facts alone. (anyone who calls this guy an n***er for making this type of mistake, despite how colossal it is, is also ignorant, people of all races change history for their own means).
supergouloz 2 months ago
LOL
U NIGGERS MAKE UP ANYTHING THAT U WANT LOL.. SO MANY DIFFERENT STORIES, SO LITTLE TIME .. AWWWW
blancoitaliano 3 months ago
@bradlyc79:aNNIBAL IS PHENCIANS JUST LIKE NAPOLEONE IS GENOIANS
(sorry for my english)i spech french.
mulud85 3 months ago
@bradlyc79:africa is amazigh name. you dont like amazigh civilisation just becaus we are more white.amazigh history is old africa history.because arfica is libya and it is tamazgha.
and my friend ,jugurtha queitus,septimus,saint augustin and pape victor ,terence the africain(afir) apulee, macrinus are amazighs.like touaregs and king INARUS.
MY FRIEND OLD AFRICA IS AMAZIGH .ALMORAVIDS ARE AMAZIGH TOO JUST LIKE GENERAL TARIK.YOUR FRIEND FOR TIZI OUZOU.
mulud85 3 months ago
@Afrikanglobal africa is AMAZIGH NAME it is from goddess ifru .
ifru is amazigh goddess of war and patry.
in antiquity africa is named africa or libya and evan egypt is in the mind of antique peoples is not in africa but in asia .
libya is amazigh named.
my friend look to amazigh civilisation and history and you will kwon.
the king MASINISA saided toi romains :africa for africains (amazighs).
mulud85 3 months ago
@Afrikanglobal fuck u bitch u get ur scholarship from YouTube videos who gives a fuck what u say read some history books on the subject u dumb nigger!!!!
mobfiggak1 3 months ago
@wtfjaftw english is not based off of latin, though some of it's words are influenced by it. languages which evolved from latin are known as "romance languages" or "romance tongues" and include spanish, french and portuguese. english is more of an evolution of the saxon and german tongues.
asteroidmonger 3 months ago
@asteroidmonger you're wrong they are called the latin languages because most of which are based off of latin also arabic was formed by moors or ethiopians as well as writing so the first languages were formed by blacks and later altered alexander pushkin a man of moorish decent which history has painted him as white helped form the russian language
MrScrillatv 3 months ago
Scipio got the name africanus due to the conquering of Carthage. A great many romans picked up 3rd names due to their prowess as a warrior or in some cases just some distinguishing marks.
jtleroy75 3 months ago
@rsHydros sorry didn't know u were a fucking English teacher
mobfiggak1 4 months ago
Another example of an intellectual who hasn't researched what he's saying, but just spouts an incorrect fact which is taken as truth.
Bangell99 4 months ago
Afri was a Latin name used to refer to the Carthaginians who dwelt in North Africa in modern-day Tunisia. Their name is usually connected with Phoenician afar, "dust", but a 1981 hypothesis[6] has asserted that it stems from the Berber word ifri or ifran meaning "cave" and "caves", in reference to cave dwellers.[7] Africa or Ifri or Afer[7] is the name of Banu Ifran from Algeria and Tripolitania (Berber Tribe of Yafran).[8]
I think Sipio was named after Africa bro...
BigBoho 4 months ago
fucking idiots...how dare you claim to have to do anything with Hannibal Barker?!!
He was caucasian you fucking worthless piece of crap!
RealAlbo4life 4 months ago
KHAMET=LAND OF HAM,REAL NAME OF AFRICA,
majowazi 4 months ago
Dear god this man is an idiot.
Available8063 4 months ago 5
@Available8063 To quote farnsworth . "The evil I can stand, but the stupidity, dear god the stupidity"
dinosaurssayni 4 months ago
@Available8063 yeah he thinks he knows but he does not!
asteroidmonger 3 months ago
@PowerfulOz1 @tolldoll100 @ mobfiggak1 ,no it haven't been called africa , the greeks called africa libya and and later the romans called (carthage) tunisia "afri" sicipio was called africanus after he conquered afri ..... just like alot of african countries been renamed after roman and greek names , iraq was called mesopotamia prior and than persia , iran, syria, egypt, ethiopia, somalia, tunisia, mooracco, mauritania, nigeria, sudan, niger
MrDuce718 5 months ago
Scippio got the title Africanus after he beat Carthage. They didnt name the continant after him it was already called that. Oh and another thing Hannabal while winning alot of battles against Rome he never conquoered it. He never went to Sicily and Italy was called Italy then too. It just wasnt a country but it was the name of the peninsala.
PowerfulOz1 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Shalom .... 1st i wanna give praise to the most high yaweh, 2nd off how about we stand as a people (blackman & woman), go back to africa & demand our own government .... we need our own country,army,politicians,kings&queens, & our own way of life not the ones we have now in america shalom isalam salakem !!!!!! please help spread the message (allthingsnew) 2012
King0fAfrica 5 months ago
Back then Egypt, Libya, northwestern Africa, kush and Nubia were the only parts known , so that is was called,Africa!
Kujunigga 5 months ago
Carthagians were of indoeuropean origins! You know what the problem is, most pseudos think like kids! They equate the word Africa with black just like the racists they claim to oppose. So anyone to them who lives in Africa is automatically black
Kujunigga 5 months ago
African history is beautiful and great! Black history is great but it also has it's follies! You won't know the real story if you listen to pseudo-intellectual coons like these moors, Muslims and Israelites. They are childish thinkers
Kujunigga 5 months ago
I'm a Ugandan and my tribe are the Baganda and our ethnic group is Bantu. The Bantu occupy most of subsaharan Africa and for most of them, it was geographically isolated. Most Bantu nations developed independently so we are not Egyptians, Ethiops, Jews, moors, etc go to scho get a real educatio. And study real history and science!
Kujunigga 5 months ago
who is this Hannibal guy I keep hearing about?
heaty007 6 months ago
@heaty007
Hannibal is a Phonetician from west Asia!! Todays Tunisia, what was Carthage!!!
TheBENGALHANNIBAL 6 months ago
@TheBENGALHANNIBAL england and the white people from england had civilised asia and africa, what has india invented when we invented boats and the plane?
Jimmyretired 6 months ago
@Jimmyretired what!! the egyptians, ethiopians, all had civilizations from 3200 BC, hieroglyphics, building pyramids,irrigation. England wasnt formed until 927AD And didn't even bathe regularly until after the 1500's! do your research
ethan5255 6 months ago
My only question is, where did they get this horrible editor from? Whoever edited these clips is the worst. C'mon man.
djkaneck1 6 months ago
Scipio Africanus was his birth name he was named after his grandfather yet who story was taught to who is a big question why argue with ignorance till ignorance make an attempt to dig deep and research on it's on and I'm not talking google or wiki BLACK MEN OF aMERICA NEED A FOUNDATION AND ITS NOT AMERICAN HISTORY
AliasWest310 6 months ago
Wow you people have no idea about history. Like others have stated. He was given, the title Scipio Africanus, AFTER he conquered Africa. My people, don't listen to these ignorant fools.
BootsyJ 6 months ago
actually afri mean catharge. which is still a latin name .... just as egypt , libya , tunisia , ethiopia
MrDuce718 6 months ago
I hate to see brothers who are ignorant... You don't wanna be called african but you'll accept moorish israelite? Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Man get off tv and and sit down somewhere. Go read a book.
RodRutledge 6 months ago
(at 47) "he kept' em there for over 30... 20 years..." Bullshit. Hannibal roamed Italy for 15 years, (it's half of 30), and Scipio was given the agnomen "The Africanus" AFTER he defeated hannibal at the battle of Zama. Usually Romans did that nicknaming with their generals and legions as well, after a famous event. For example Nero Claudius Drusus was named "Germanicus" after several battles won in Germany. Now I don't believe nothing That Virgil guy might say.
He is either ignorant or a liar
lacusicusi 6 months ago
haha this guy just buckled on his history
metallicballa666 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
in those times roman generals was typically given the sir name of the land mass that they conquered not the other way around see... hannibal by jacob abbott. and we are not talking about the intire contienent just what was carthage which consisted of modern day tunisia, libya, algeria, norther morrocco, north west egypt, corsica, sardinia, southern spain, etc... so alot of false info. and if hannibal was black is not up for debate. that kindergarden stuff. he was!!!!!
billiondollarbaby973 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
africa was already called africa. africa was one of that land mass most ancient name. hannibal had about 40000 troops and they all were not carthagenians. some were but some were namidian (from inner africa) great sling throwers. some wee ever greek, because carthagenians also outsourced their military, but majority were black. i do not deny that. now as far as the nam scipio africanus. his original name was scipio the elder even though he was the son of his father already named scipio.
billiondollarbaby973 7 months ago
lies upon lies upon lies..thousands and thousand of years of lies and distortion..africa was originally afrika meaning land of the free. you see no slaves or slave owners...this man is part right.europeans did give the name afrikan but because they saw how the people were truly free to live their own lives.a-free-man later know as afrika or african is what the europeans would call it.not because of some war..but originally blacks did not define them selfs as africans as a country
skatering42 7 months ago
Coulda been worse. They could've used his first name. Then you'd be fron the continent of "Skippy"
dave4248 7 months ago
Your're Not an Israelites !!
Aebrahiem 7 months ago
What's with the stupid hat? Is that because you want to emphasize the comedy factor? No need to do that. It is already hilarious.
ludekkZmrd 7 months ago
LOLOL ffuark funny cunt
somewolfguy 7 months ago
Scipio Africanus did not pick that name up until after he defeated Hannibal...Africa means the land of the Afer or Ifri( the indigenous blk tribe Hannibal was part of)...Afer- the people ca-means land in the roman dialect...Scipio did not pick up Africanus until he defeated Hannibal...just cos ur older don't mean u kno alot
mobfiggak1 7 months ago 6
@mobfiggak1 I'll give you that. Scippio was given that name after defeating Hannibal. Its said that he ordered Carthage salted so that nothing would grow there, spawning from the LONG war with Carthage. As the color of him, Id tell you he was black, or of African descent/man of color. But people of today have so greatly fallen for the bs taught in school, and they hold that as truth. If folks would do the research, theyd know so much more. I dont know it all, but I know more than the average.
Apollo2003 7 months ago
@Apollo2003 Knowing as much as you do, you should know that 'Scipio' is spelled with only 1 'p'.
You're saying that all the research telling us that Scipio was a Roman from Italy is wrong? How did YOU come to THAT conclusion?
100ProcentNasze 6 months ago
lol, "Named after a Caucasian....and I don't call myself an African"
SHOCK, HORROR, SHOCK HORROR, well I am..APPALLED!!
btw, it was the other way around, but whatever bro.
aaron9099 8 months ago
Africa was a name the Romans invented, they'd no idea about black Africa as we know it today under the desert or the Arabs in Arabia.
Gonzoidzz 8 months ago
What The Fuck!
petion2010 8 months ago
these videos are always good for a laugh!
KumarZimmerman08 9 months ago
It is true
LiamBenIsrael 9 months ago
WARNING TO ALL WHO ENTER DISCUSSIONS WITH XXYFORLIFEAGAIN : GRAEME TUCKER!
HIGHLY VOLATILE ARGUER AND STALKER AND HARASSER ON YOUTUBE AND ONLINE AND IN HIS OWN TERRITORY OF NEW ZEALAND
be aware.... highly crazy out of control mean nutcase is what they are!
even nutcases like to talk about controversial subjects!
he is stalking a commenter at the moment
peaceandparty 9 months ago
Comment removed
july95211 9 months ago
@jXXforLIFEagain, According to ancient records , i merely stated FACTS, and i'm NOT your brother, i'm female,(Lewele), i'm an elkekez,(african ) wemen.
july95211 9 months ago
@XXYforLIFEagain , The race of black man is a black caucasian-Negro hYbrid, he's NOT elkekez,(african), ancient records confirm that the race of black caucasian man is mankind , ancient documents speak of race of black caucasian mankind, ALL black men are black caucasian-Negro gentiles, their ADAMS seedline; the black man is the Father of white/lightskin, mixedrace, mongoloid hYbrid,cloned Fallen -seed races. The elkekez,(african) wemens race eLe,(eve) is not the same race as Adams sons.
july95211 9 months ago
He didn't even state why it was names after Aficanus. It also troubled me that he said that Hannibal conquered all of Italy. These guys are clearly Afro-centric in their beliefs.
wolfdawg357 9 months ago
@wolfdawg357
hi wolfdawg!
i guarantee that the day nears where this stalker person actually stops his crap
i am on his tail,literally seeing as he is a mean cat in his latest video attacking one of your own kind!
i want you to know that you are not alone in this in any shape or form
peaceandparty 9 months ago
ALL the light/whiteskin, mixedrace, mongoloid caucasian races have NO roots on this earth,they have NO connection to this earth, because the back caucasian man grafted /cloned /created these hYbrid races from himself, their his seedline; apparently the race of black caucasian man is the Lunar Cycle man Adam..
july95211 9 months ago
@july95211 "light/white skin"?? No such thing.
draxx77 9 months ago
hannibal conquered all of italy? -.- ehm, no
Daski69 9 months ago
311nonono is right. The name Africa as pertaining to the continent of Africa existed long before the Roman general was born. The title he was given, Scipio Africanus, means "conquerer of Africa."
tolldoll100 9 months ago 9
@tolldoll100 Are you sure about that?
draxx77 9 months ago
The race of black man are the romans, because the word Roman means Negro, and the word Negro means testis of man, the race of black man are black caucasian hYbrid ADAM sons, their gentiles; and the light/whiteskin, mixed, mongoloid caucasian races are his recently created, black caucasian hYbrid, gentile seedline.
july95211 9 months ago
@july95211 what the fuck you talking about????hahahaha
kemetkush 9 months ago
@kemetkush According to ancient records, i have merely stated FACTS.
july95211 9 months ago
@kemetkush Don't worry. July95211 is another one of the Youtube pseudo-intellectuals.
tolldoll100 9 months ago
@tolldoll100 a white-zionists asshole....hahahaha
kemetkush 9 months ago
@tolldoll100 Also, he does not believe what he is saying anyway...he couldn't.
draxx77 9 months ago
Comment removed
draxx77 9 months ago
@july95211 Black Caucasian?! You are a Jew telling more lies. STFU!
draxx77 9 months ago
According to ancient records Kelkeke was renamed Africa by the invading black European-Negro- Caucasian race of man ADAM- hYbrid, and his created white/lightskin,mixed, mongoloid caucasian black Negro hYbrid sons, because the race of black man is black caucasian, he's NOT Kelkekez,(african); the letters A. F. R. I. C. A, stand for Adams, testis-rays eye of caucasian Adam.
july95211 9 months ago
@july95211
Never heard of that one before, it's kinda funny, give me some links.
draxx77 9 months ago
@july95211
You have been reading the wrong books.
draxx77 9 months ago
@draxx77 ,The race of black caucasian man ADAM has been the devil throughout herstory, ancient records confirm that there's a black caucasian devil, who is the root of ALL evil, the white/lightskin, mixedrace, mongoloid caucasoid hYbrid races are his cloned/ made races, they have NOT been around for very long, they have no herstory; ALL the wars throughtout herstory were done by the black caucasian-Negro sons of ADAM race, they raged war against ancient elkekez,(african) wemens race eve(ele).
july95211 9 months ago
is this serious, africanus was some sort of title that the roman senate gave scipio in membrence of his great victorie at zama
Umbrella0021 9 months ago
@marksabatini
Europeans from Siberia are different to Europeans from England,,, Aren't they?
Asians from India & Asians from China are different,, Aren't they?
Sure, Africa is a HUGE CONTINENT of rainbow-races,,, just like Europe, Australia or Asia.
Arabs, Jews & Europeans MIGRATED to all over the world, including Africa.
That's why, you have Arabs, Jews & Europeans in the Americas, Australia, North & South Africa.
Isn't that what your "Western archeologists" thought you in your "universities"?
BahreNeGash 10 months ago
@marksabatini This is totally wrong, Africa at one point was all black any well studied person will tell you this. All people came from out of Africa and those people were black not Arab, they came way later. Unpigmented people didin't even show up on the earth until 20 to 30,000yrs after the Grimaldi people of Europe and this group of people came from West Africa, this is well documented. Ask any Arab about there history and they will tell you they migrated from the middle east into Africa.
germanyinthehouse 10 months ago
Even if any of what the man just said was true, I'd be honored to have my continent named after a Roman, especially when my people living on said continent have failed to ever achieve anything that rivals a tenth of the greatness of the Roman Republic and Empire.
EdikShepherd 10 months ago
@EdikShepherd You have no clue of Africa then and I think you are surely not from Africa at all. Africa started everything in Rome, the real romains anyway. Africa had many golden ages and rome had none, please do the reshearch.
germanyinthehouse 10 months ago
@germanyinthehouse North Africa alone had extremely little to no influence in the founding of Rome, which was a small and isolated event on the Tiber River that most of the world probably didn't even know about. The Romans themselves are a mix of what is recorded to be Greek and native Latin blood, not African.
Also, Rome had no golden ages because its entire existence was a golden age. It invented the precursors to plumbings, baths, stadiums, race tracks, and built great structures abroad.
EdikShepherd 10 months ago
@germanyinthehouse And are you paring sub-saharan Africans with North Africans and Egyptians? The continent may be the same, but the people and cultures are DRASTICALLY different. Africans from Kenya are not the same as Africans from Egypt. They are different in millions of ways.
EdikShepherd 10 months ago
@EdikShepherd In that case, Scandinavians in Northern Europe are different in many ways from the Italians and the Greeks in Southern Europe.
tolldoll100 9 months ago
@tolldoll100 Of course they are. I'm mostly Danish and I have no problem admitting that we never did, nor never will, do anything as great as many Southern European countries.
EdikShepherd 9 months ago
@germanyinthehouse Your knowledge of Roman history is as flawed as your spelling or, are you spelling in "ebonics"?Monkey.
MuhammadsStillASissy 9 months ago
Excellent point, we shouldnt go by the name given to us by our enemy instead we must name ourselves. Elijah Muhammad didnt have time for all the detail but he called us the black man and women of planet asia.
mutantz 10 months ago
I'm afraid that's not technically true about the name of the continent called Africa. If you look at an old map you will see the continent did not have 'AFRICA' wrote across it.
Based on one of the oldest maps in Europe and one of the oldest of Africa-it came from a similarly sounding small kingdom in a modern day Arab country. The map is from the old Catalonian kingdom in modern day Spain. Google ''BBC old map of Africa audio slideshow'. I found you the facts so peace be with you.
1scot4scotland 10 months ago
the wrong history, anibal dont conquer all the italy, he dont atack the italy from cartague but from the cartagenese colony in spain, and by land from spain go to italy. And the roman general only have the name africanus when win the batle in cartago. So the only thing that i have to say is go look in history and stop saying more bullshit. Sorry for my english, is not my native language
goodspeedNHC99 10 months ago
lol these guys looked baked
MrWildman19 10 months ago
It's amazing how much racist hatred, outright lies and just plain stupidity can be stuffed into 2 minutes and 8 second.
Congratulations to the masters of bullshit..
311nonono 10 months ago
311nonono 10 months ago 25
@311interesting, u seem so "SHOCKED" (suggested by the exclamation of "wow")..to the point that u found it necessary to call him "stupid AND ignorant"..which one is it? Surely, u know there is a difference. I personally would like 2thank u 4sharing the knowledge that u clearly found from another source (i presume u did not dig up the original source of ur information..correct?) I never knew this information before & I am NOT stupid just ignorant about said topic JUST AS U WERE B4 U LOOKED it up.
keybobrob 10 months ago
Now, thanks to this man and to YOU (for "tweaking" his information) I now know that Africa was named by white men of Latin origin (prob Roman)...which i quite confidently feel was his original point (Scipio was "white" and so was the "Latin" who named the continent)...even if his "facts" did not line up with what you say is historically accurate. So thank you again for your knowledge...that you read from somewhere else....since you were not actually PRESENT at the naming ceremony nor was he ;-)
keybobrob 10 months ago
@311 Now for some other food 4thought. Surely u are aware the RECORDED HISTORY is heavily biased and much of it if not all is 100% dependent on the transcriber of historical events. I'm also confident in your prior knowledge of the fact that much of the history that was recorded by the conquerors is virtually ALWAYS PARTIAL AGAINST THE VANQUISHED (a common human idiosyncrasy) For example, have you ever heard of eugenics? A pseudo science paraded as FACT by whites to justify slavery&colonization.
keybobrob 10 months ago
@311nonono so if its a fact that recorded history can NEVER be 100% ACCURATE...but must always include some liberties taken here and there and filleed with conjecutre mixed with facts and hypotheses. I am sure the American Revolution is told a bit differently from the two opposing sides...lol. My point is, do you really need to be so hard on a group of people who have had their ENTIRE CULTURE STRIPPED FROM THEM (which includes their LANGUAGE, GOD , FAMILY AND TRUE HISTORY)..
keybobrob 10 months ago
@311nono so if a group of people have been TOTALLY DISCONNECTED from THEIR LINEAGE OF LANGUAGE, ORAL HISTORY, SPIRITUALITY/RELIGION, FAMILY, NORMS, VALUES, ETHICS AND MORES...and brought to a foreign land in the worst possible conditions and were terrorized,oppressed and subjugated for generations upon generations ...is it it really so surprising that some would attempt to try and gain a sense of self- worth even if they are stretching or twisting the "so called" true historical events around??
keybobrob 10 months ago
@311nonono if a person had a horrible childhood that was filled with all sorts of abuses, neglect and other negative experiences...would it be shocking for that person after growing into adulthood to need constant emotional support due to the many insecurities that s/he developed over the tumultuous earlier years of development. Perhaps we should not be so quick to judge the hearts minds and behaviors of others lest we walk a mile in their shoes. Peace and Blessing to you my friend.
keybobrob 10 months ago
@keybobrob
I don’t think wow suggests shock. This sort of anti-anything white is no longer shocking. I would have been shocked if it was otherwise.
It’s both ! Ignorant because he does not know the facts(to the best that historian have deciphered) stupid because I also call white racists stupid (I can give you other reasons , but that’s good enough).
On this particular subject, I have not been ignorant of it since I was 12 years old.
311nonono 10 months ago
@keybobrob What I was ignorant of and I did look up is the origins of the name Africa, and the probability that it comes from a white Latin devil is very low :).
The name’s most likely origins are from the African tribes of North Africa.
So, should I thank him for me looking up the origins of the name Africa. Definitely not.
I will not thank him, but rather credit him for the propagation of a unique African–American brand of racism against all white individuals.
311nonono 10 months ago
@keybobrob Even if these individuals are new to these shores and even if their ancestors could have been serfs or slaves.
As far as recorded history, it is what it is, and we try (at least those whose interest is the truth) to muddle through what’s available. Even the Egyptian Pharos would sometimes try to remove the existence of a prior from all inscriptions and monuments.
311nonono 10 months ago
@keybobrob Here is some food for though for you.
The scourge of slavery in the Americas may not have been possible if it had not already been very active in the Islamic countries of Africa. Active in both the black nations and Arab nations of Africa and the Middle Eastern nations since circa 900AD. They plundered the human resources of Africa for slaves along with the southern coasts of Europe and any ship on the high seas (The US Marine’s anthem attests to this).
311nonono 10 months ago
@keybobrob The Portuguese and Spanish dipped into this pot of illicit human gold and the Americas partook in the plunder. But whitey does not share the credit, no, he gets all of it. Even if his white ass great great grandmother was a slave to a black Islamic Moor.(yeah, I know not many, it’s just the point).
And the Islamic black Africans and Arabs are absolved and washed squeaky clean (ask Louis Farrakhan).
311nonono 10 months ago
@keybobrob
Now that I have said all this let me just tell you,
you are preaching to the choir.
You ask if I can understand. I think I can. Have I gone through his trials and tribulations, probably not. My concession is that I am a lot harder on white racist, and actually, I tend to ignore black racists.
But I do know the poison that racism is and that goes for both black and white racism.
311nonono 10 months ago
@keybobrob
And spreading and propagation the poison of racism is not excusable or pardonable for anyone be they white or black.
Every man and woman is a product of their experiences. If he lives in a world where everyone nods in agreement when he shoots we “hate black people”. If someone is not “hard on him” and tells him this is not right. How will his experience ever change?, will he not be doomed to his past?
311nonono 10 months ago
@keybobrob
I could, not care, and say nothing.
But this is poisoning young minds, so that they become like him, where does it stop?
Am I talking about young white minds in the slave-master's household or am I talking about young black minds listening to Mr. Virgil Jones?
Does it matter?
311nonono 10 months ago
@311no.which is the "truth" ? I don't know about you my friend but I was not around 20,50 or 100 centuries ago...were you. History is absolute...like mathematics....HOWEVER THE TELLING OF HISTORY ....well that is a WHOLE nother story. HIS-STORY(history)...vs. MY- STORY (mystery).
Surely you realize there is countless controversies over the telling of historical events. In fact,, we will never know the truth...until we invent some sort of time machine. The fact is history writer skew things.
keybobrob 10 months ago
@keybobrob
No one now alive on this planet was around 20, 50 or 100 centuries ago.
History can have the bias of the teller or recorder.
Historical events can be controversial.
OK, so you have stated the obvious.
Now What !
Oh of course, now from these obvious points you want me to put Mr. Virgil Jones on equal footing with currently accepted historical dogma.
I think not !
311nonono 10 months ago
@keybobrob
Because then even the loony who says slavery in the US never existed, would have a place at the table of history along with Mr. Virgil Jones. (If you don’t like this example make up your own).
The problem with using the above points as the sole basic for supporting Mr. Virgil Jones is that Mr. Virgil Jones was also not there many centuries ago.
But people who wrote down his or their story were.
Archeological artifacts or evidence is explored and researched.
311nonono 10 months ago
@keybobrob
The bias of the teller is taken into account, and that goes double for the bias of he/she who evaluates the teller. (Oh my, pray tell, Mr. Virgil Jones certainly has no bias.)
Historical events are controversial because of the scrutiny of historians and archaeologists alike.
You want more scrutiny? I suggest that Mr. Virgil Jones is a force for anti-scrutiny.
To even suggest equal footing for Mr. Virgil Jones is to debase historians and archaeologists everywhere!
311nonono 10 months ago
@keybobrob
And if that is not enough may I also suggest Mr. Virgil Jone's racist and anti-white undertones.
311nonono 10 months ago
@311nonono, I have read COUNTLESS books in the past 25-30 years my friend...literally hundreds and hundreds of them...(these do not include the many i read as part of my required course work reading during my university years)...I tend to make it my business to use my own PERSONAL walk in life coupled with the virtually endless amount of informaion, insights, perspectives, perceptions, hypothesis, theories, commentaries,..etc.. gathered from the plethora of books i've digested over my life..
keybobrob 10 months ago
@311nonono, and as a part of my gathering of information I also have dialogued with apparent intelligent folk such as urself & have gained insight % perspective over the years. I have learned through my own walk & experiences & I have learned from many others via literature I've read or conversations like this one, or through academics...or whatever. It's very unfortunate that not only the very language we use to communicate can often times NOTeffectively and quickly reflect our inner thoughts
keybobrob 10 months ago
@311nonono we often have to go back and forth just to realize that much of the entire content of the dialog is more in accord than not. In this particular case, in all the countless books i have read not ONE is from Virgil Jones..(perhaps you can show me otherwise..). It's so sad how in the so called "information age" we as a society have been dumbed down...even more. We think the way to gather information is to go to youtube , wikipedia and the like...lol. It's sad. This forum is not the place
keybobrob 10 months ago
@keybobrob I must agree with what you say about this forum.I must question your "countless book" theory.First,while I doubt that Virgil Jones has written anything worth printing;I would suspect that despite the "countless " books you claim to have read, you have not read them all and there are surely MANY authors you do not know.Secondly, you invite someone to "show you otherwise".The question is unclear.Do you expect him to prove that you have read a book BY (not from) Jones or that one exists?
MuhammadsStillASissy 9 months ago
@MuhammadsStillASissy all i know is that a High Capacity Mag can holds more rounds than the standard cap. mag and my 33 round 9 mm Glock mag, as opposed to the bullshit17 round mag furnished w/pistol...is the choice with a semiwadcutter in my AK-47 fuck the full metal jackets ammo...when it comes blowin heads off....AMERICA FUCK YEAH...Im wit you bro!! We will keep dese bastardragheads the fuck out of our land. you and me will hold USA high baby...AMERICA ...FUCK YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!
keybobrob 9 months ago
@keybobrob sounds I wouldn't trust my life to a 9mm even with 33 rounds but that's me. In a gunfight it is hard to fire much on moving targets. That Glock is a GREAT choice and the reliability (along with proper ammo and lots of it) puts it at the top of true Mankilling Work Guns.The A.K. is the top mankiller now although there are better long guns it always works and as long as it kills,; dead is dead.Sub MOI is nice for extreme range or targets but for close up man size killing the AK WORKS!
MuhammadsStillASissy 9 months ago
@311nonono Please send me references please I would like to look this up.
germanyinthehouse 10 months ago
@germanyinthehouse
References to what ? The universe?
311nonono 10 months ago
@311nonono Thank you. You have saved me a long post.What a Moke that monkey is. It looks like anyone can become a BlackHistory expert if they are black and their mothers dress them funny.
MuhammadsStillASissy 9 months ago
@311nonono African Americans? What do African Americans have to with that? this isn't "African American History" whatsoever.
luciferiexcelsil 9 months ago
@luciferiexcelsil How do you know?
draxx77 9 months ago
@draxx77 African American history starts at the colonisation of Europeans of the Americas, not before... before that it is just African, European and Mediterranean history.
luciferiexcelsil 9 months ago
@luciferiexcelsil But African-Americans were African BEFORE the colonization, the American-ness began when we got to America, we never stopped being African, we are African AND American.
draxx77 9 months ago
@draxx77, ONLY the elkekez(african) wemen taken as slaves to America were elkekez,(african), today ONLY the very few non-miXed african american Wemen are still elkekez,(african), but the black men taken as slaves to America were and are black caucasian hYbrid ADAMS, they were NEVER elkekez,(african).
july95211 9 months ago
@july95211
No, I think that you either made that up or you have been reading some very Jew edited books.
draxx77 9 months ago
@draxx77 ,According to ancient records, it's FACT.
july95211 9 months ago
@draxx77 Then it is African history, not African-American.
luciferiexcelsil 9 months ago
@luciferiexcelsil
Do you know what an "African-American" is?
draxx77 9 months ago
@311nonono You are white, so why are YOU even watching this?
draxx77 9 months ago
@311nonono We're not AfriKans living in AmeriKKKa...we are from Israel!
XsankofaX 9 months ago
@311nonono BULLSHIT!!!
dedrawilliams 7 months ago
Your right Hannibal was Black. I made the first Black Movie of Hannibal
eyemoney1 10 months ago
Wow... Don't they realize that Africanus was a title meaning conqueror of Africa. The name Africa was already used in Latin. Hannibal Barca was certainly not African; he came from a royal family that used to live in Phoenicia. I hate idiots that change history because of this race empowerment crap.
lulzcoaster 11 months ago
go to your public library & borrow books on ancient rome & then read them. you might learn something.
rioyaque99 11 months ago
how are your leaders gona lead if they cant even read.. its all in the history books this dude doesnt know shit
DFameSR14 11 months ago
I'm ghanian and i'm gonna speak to my father and get back to on this . Why do all african americans wear hats are they all muslims ??
DAAWG 11 months ago
ahahahaha i love how everything that guy said about hannibal and scipio was wrong
shadovar123 11 months ago
this guy is rather mis-informed
mogochoholow 11 months ago
he was not named Africanus, his name was Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Asina... Africanus is a title: it means something like "Conquerer of Africa"... the Latins/Italians called it Africa and english has deep roots in latin... and you get the rest...
FaakedLillebror 11 months ago
LOL. This guy gets everything wrong.
grahamdunne 11 months ago
this guy does not know his roman history. hannibal conquered all of italy and sicily? check again compadre.
andrewgpayne3 1 year ago 9
Comment removed
andrewgpayne3 1 year ago
Caucasian? Romans were tan skinned dark haired people.....decendants of Mediterranean and Greek and easterners.... the term "Caucasian" didnt even exist back then...hes doing the SAME thing that hes accusing people of doing to him
these Afrocentrists have their own fucked up bias to what everything is. SMH
Everything got its name from something, its Who you are an What you do that matters, not the superficial names......
mrtundra45 1 year ago
incorrect.....leo was named after afrika. more confusion for the masses
RAHAMEEM 1 year ago
@RAHAMEEM dude thats bullshit because africa was known as either the land of kamet which also identified egypt or the land of ham which is in the bible people in those days didnt see the what we know as africa as one continent
smoothcollected 1 year ago
damn thats some heavy history!
kage574 1 year ago
Black people are so fuckin retarded, first his name was Publius Cornelius Scipio. Africanus was his nickname he acquired in the Punic wars. Second Hannibal never conquered Italy. Third Hannibal was from Carthage a city founded by Caucasians. All of North Africa was Caucasian back then and today it is Arab. Arabs are also considered to be Caucasian. Blacks were hardly involved.
njdevil281 1 year ago
@njdevil281 So tell me how was all of N. Africa caucasian if the ancient Egyptians were Black? The reason why arabs are there now is because of multiple invasion by Hyskos, persian and mongolian nomads. The persians were the last invasion to win rulership of egypt. The caucasians were never indiginous to Egypt. They were the barbaric invaders from the north. They lived in caves during the highlight of black civilizations. That is why Arabs (ancient persians) Over run the country.
seinfeildsucks 1 year ago
@seinfeildsucks LoL, the Ancient Egyptians were never black. A look at their hieroglyphs is proof enough. The Nubians who lived along the Southern Nile were black but the Egyptians were not. Also the Ptolemaic Dynasty which were Greeks ruled Egypt for hundreds of years before and after the Punic Wars. They took over Egypt from the native Egyptians back in the days of Alexander. Egyptian is an ethnic group and they are not and never were black.
njdevil281 1 year ago
@njdevil281 "The Ancient Egyptians were never black" Sure. Either you belive the nazi puesdo science as Egyptians being "White" (Which has been proven a lie), or you believe the story of the jews coming out of captivity from slavery of Egypt. Which ever one. The Egyptians NEVER had slaves. They had indentured servents! Give me proof of that finding. What dynasty? The word "Kmt" means "Land of the blacks
seinfeildsucks 1 year ago
@seinfeildsucks Trying to revise history will never fill your racial insecurities, sorry to disappoint. Where did all of these magical black Egyptians go?? I give you legitimate facts and you give me oral diarrhea.
njdevil281 1 year ago
@njdevil281 first of all bad Joke because if you know any history blacks were chased out of egypt by arabs.the same arabs who enslaved blacks (google meditteranean slave trade), those blacks escaped into the sub saharan region which started the term sub saharan blacks. The sad truth is there is authentic proof showing how whites tried to convince blacks in the america they had no history what so ever.so ask yourself who really proven themselves capable of trying to rewrite history
smoothcollected 1 year ago
@smoothcollected Arabs didn't invade Egypt until the fall of the Byzantine Empire you dumb ass. Blacks trying to take credit for Egypt is the most pathetic thing ever. The Byzantine's controlled Egypt since the splitting of Rome. Egyptian is an ethnic group and 90% of the people who live in Egypt today are ethnically Egyptian. Arabs are a small minority. Black Africans live in central and Southern Africa, they hadn't even invented the wheel or a system of writing.
njdevil281 1 year ago
@njdevil281 everything your cracker ass knw about blacks wasnt even taught to you by blacks.....you dont see chinese ppl trying to tell you about russians or greeks or anything like that.....Guess why because know one cares.....white pple are the only race on youtube who surf youtube criticizing other races because no one gives a shit about your history
smoothcollected 1 year ago
@smoothcollected I don't need to be taught North African history by blacks, because blacks are from Sub-Suharan Africa. You can look at any Ancient Egyptian hieroglyph and they depict blacks as foreigners. Look at the Cartouche of Tutankhamun, he is standing on conquered blacks. If you went to Egypt and said ancient Egyptians were black, the millions of ethnic Egyptians standing all around you would fucking laugh their asses off.
njdevil281 1 year ago
@njdevil281 and Just because you see a certain amount of non blacks in a region doesnt make it clear cut that there wasnt another race there earlier.....thats like saying south africa didnt start off all black because there are damn near Just as many whites as blacks....when we know thats false..its funny how I can pull up Just as many whites and middle eastners believe what i believe but I bet you cant find any blacks who would even attempt to say what you believe...
smoothcollected 1 year ago
@smoothcollected Any black person outside of America doesn't believe in the pan africanist bullshit that you do. It is embarrassing.
njdevil281 1 year ago
@seinfeildsucks In fact the Egyptians and later Arabs had black slaves for centuries. Arabs slave traders called blacks Kaffirs. Do you know who it was who stopped the Arabs from owning black slaves??? It was those evil white colonial powers who made it illegal. You're welcome. In fact it was white people who were the first people in the world to outlaw slavery.
njdevil281 1 year ago
@njdevil281 riddle me this.....even the people you refer to as egyptians did not refer to thmselves as such....so what did they? that name didnt even exist in their mind nor language
smoothcollected 1 year ago
@smoothcollected They have always refereed to themselves as Egyptian.
njdevil281 1 year ago
@njdevil281 first of all thats bullshit cracker....second of all dick face youll be the laughing stock simply because every one besides blacks knows that white men have no culture and simply try to butt into everyone else's and discredit anyone else...and as far as egyptians being a word used in ancient egypt is simply bullshit and ill advise you to go get reeducated dick face.....youtube the accounts of one Napoleon soldiers and youll understand how insecure your roots are LOL
smoothcollected 1 year ago
Why should I listen to you when you can't even spell properly? My roots by the way, go back some 3,500 years of advanced civilization. Rome, Greece, Byzantium, the Empires. Your talking to the people who put men on the moon and invented everything you use in your daily life, including the computer your using to speak to me, your car you drive to get to work (assuming that you do), and the clothes that you wear. Normally I wouldn't go this far but your use of the word cracker compels me to.
njdevil281 1 year ago
@njdevil281 first of all im sure my statments were interpreted the way they needed to be you. Secondly with that being said, you highlighting what was probably a simple error that makes no real indication of my level of intellect is nothing more than you reaching and being desperate. and as far as the computer you speak of look at all the contributors and youll be surprise and feeling dumb. thirdly Ive had several classes regarding inventors and scientist and am willing to go shot for shot.
smoothcollected 1 year ago
@njdevil281 and there are plenty of inventions by blacks.air conditioning, traffic lights, real everday shit. but im sure a person like yourself will have many reasons for why thats incorrect.and as far as the computer goes again there are alot of "middle easterners who would dispute that and lets not get on the inventions stolen from the asians that are claimed by your kind..and those that blacks were forced to be sold in the mid 1800's...oh yea i learned that at the university of alabama. lol
smoothcollected 1 year ago