Added: 3 years ago
From: TheYoungTurks
Views: 6,472
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (75)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • let him keep the name, but change his number. just to fuck with him a bit

  • ocho sucko

  • ahha this guy tells dat shit straight

  • reebok is not the only nfl supplyer look at the uniforms

  • Ocho Cenk-o is alright!

  • ive seen this guy on twitter. could never figure out why he was called that!! now i know!!!!

  • reebok is the official logo for the nfl he had to wait a year since they spent the money already but this year he will be ochocinco...

  • wtf is this guy saying?

  • that white guy....he's my hero.lol!

  • reboc sells ochocinco jerseys anyway! and now this is very annoying but i love him ochocinco rocks. but why make him wear johnson when you're going to sell both

  • ocho cinco is awesome and i love him i was very upset when they did that, but REBOC SOLD OCHOCINCO JERSEYS ANYWAY! so whats the point of making him wear chad johnson instead!

  • U made the example about Jordan changing his number to 45 for a small time that is contradicting what u were saying about C. Johnson being a collectors item. Ocho Cinco would be the comparison to 45 not C. Johnson. Think b4 speaking. Either way the NFL is a business people forget that. You are being payed to play a game u sign contracts and they dress u in their gear. Theres no underarmor no nike wristbands. Its all reebok, (besides shoes) y cause their the offical clothing of the NFL.

  • I think this man have point...

  • hahaha you rock, cenk

  • Everything is racial hey terd burglar? You are the biggot from what I have been hearing! Your claim has no merit and go back to broadcast school and try and upgrade your C average. Yahh I said it...

  • i agree, you don't make a player pay for all the jerseys when they change teams.

  • Nothing weirds stiff corporate types out more than a loud, wild black guy doing crazy stuff. About the wildest thing some of these guys have ever done is put dimes in their penny loafers, so a person like Chad Johnson, who is definitely a bizarre cat, totally freaks them out.

  • "Nothing weirds stiff corporate types out more than a loud, wild black guy doing crazy stuff."

    Dude, that's not funny, that's racist. Stop associating black people with those adjectives, loud, wild, ec....And I'm sure corporate types don't sit thinking that...they bottom line care about money not about race so it could be any player doing crazy stuff.

  • It's not meant to be funny. I know people who see a brash black guy and it immediately translates to "loud, wild" to them. And if you think they only think about money and race never factors in to anything, well you live in the wrong world.

  • I don't give a damn about sports nor do I know this person but that last line made me laugh and clap my hands.

  • Fuck NFL and all those Reebok corporate fuck wits. LET HIM GO!

  • Cenk is wrong......Reebok signed a contract....and NFL players signed contract with NFL...so if they made jerseys for this year....he can either buy all those jerseys or stop bitching and except the name you had all the way before a week of season.

  • you said it right its partially a race issue. I think chad is being stubborn and dumb for chaning his name but hey thats his choice. Reebok is even more dumb for not making him his new jersey. I cant believe the league lets them get away with that. how much of a difference is it when players get traded?? their old jerseys have the prices reduced dramatically and the price goes further down and down with each few years. lol maybe oboma should look into this sike jp

  • NFL = No Fun League

  • Cenk is dead-on yet again!

  • Cenk is the fucking man. When in comes to Cenk I'm like John McCain and Bush in that I agree with Cenk 90% of the time.

  • It's a publicity stunt. He's just trying to get more famous. Bengals still suck.

    I don't really care.

  • This is how stupid Chad J. is.  Ocho Cinco is not even 'eighty-five' it is 'eight' and then a 'five' There is a difference. His # is eighty-five, which is ochenta y cinco

  • well he's stupid for doing it in first place.....but i think your wrong on that he didnt kno ocho cinco was 8 5......he did it because it sound "cooler"

  • I totally agree with TYT on this one...couldn't have said it better.

  • Rarelibra-

    The onus of proof is on you to show that the contract contained a legal name change clause. I've never heard of one and I doubt you have either. So you must show that the contract has one in order to place the blame on the individual rather than the company.

  • cogently put. that's exactly what i'm sayin

  • You are an idiot! The NFL has a contract with Reebok. Chad Johnson has a contract with the NFL. Any questions?

  • With clothing is the contract always through the NFL? Can a player go elsewhere for clothing deals or do they have to operate through the NFL at all times?

  • Reebok is the exclusive maker of NFL jerseys. As such they run the show when it comes to the jerseys. In the case of Chad Johnson, they'd already created several hundred thousand C.Johnson jerseys for this season. So what Chad is asking them to do is just throw away all the money they spent in creating those jerseys and go and create a new jersey for him now. It's his fault for waiting so long to change his name. He did it a week before the season started.

  • yes tokyo is 100% right here. So it's funny how people try to blow sh** outta proportion and make it look like Chad is getting screwed here. When in fact he is tring to screw the NFL and Reebok on a contract HE signed.

  • the nfl finds every little thing players do and to try and screw them. Chad is trying to mess with the nfl but so what the nfl blew it out of proportion last year...If it was Bret farve I bet the story would end a whole lot different

  • bingo... less than 5 hours for the RACE CARD to come flying. weak sauce, son!

  • There absolutely are racist elements in this situation.

  • There's nothing racist about it. If you remember there was a lot of hesitation from the league about letting coaches wear suits because they have that contract with Reebok and Reebok wants to have their name and logo plastered over everything. They have a ton of influence over the NFL because of that.

    From what i've heard he'll be able to have Ocho Cinco on the back of his jersey next year (or if they sell out of his jerseys this year). So it's going to happen.

  • Reebok's claim is B.S.. They print all these jerseys and then turn around and try to make him buy them because of his name !?!? What the he** would they do if he got traded at the last minute and they were stuck with 30000 jerseys with the old team on them ? This is publicity BS and Reebok is doing nothing but making themselves look weak by making a spectacle out of it.

  • Let him change his name, who cares... I mean it is kinda of a slap in the face to his family name, but it is a name, an identification tag. Also, maybe Reebok and #85 are using this argument to capitalize as much as humanly possible. Next, O.C. should hire Jesse Jackson and maybe start dating a famous white girl. Also, I'm not a Chad hater, but I can't wait till the Steelers bust his ass twice this year.

  • Ocho Cinco! goatta nice ring to it.

  • In spanish eight five is actually ochenta y cinco...but who really cares right...I think the NFL is being hypocritical with the whole situation, race may play a role but its not clear...

  • whats that OCHO CINCO means?

  • ocho cinco means "eight five" in spanish

  • Ocho Cinco = Eighty-Five in Spanish if i am correct.

    Reference to his jersey number.

  • thanks guys..

  • Just Ocho = 8 Cinco = 5 its runs smoother than ochenta y cinco

  • This is not bullshit. It's called a CONTRACT.

  • there's no way in hell you call tell me that reebok's lawyers had the foresight to put "may not make legal changes to your given name" in the contract, if you saw that 1 coming, you're clairvoyant. the greater point is that they're trying to control the dude. that's whack

  • Until you sit in the situation, you cannot judge. These companies make a lot of money off of advertising, as the players also make a nice cut. A contract is a contract - by changing the name (and hence the product), he must pay a penalty. STFU and stop commenting on something that is WAY past your comprehension.

  • beyond comprehension? again, you made yourself look foolish. like i said, there's no question in my mind that there is no clause in the contract about a legal name change. NONE. unless you wrote or signed the contract, read contract or where the typist, you don't know either idiot. what i'm saying is that they can't use these ridiculous levees to control the young brother.

  • dude, unless you HAVE the contract specifications, don't claim to be a SME.

  • that's not what i'm saying. i'm saying that you don't know either therefore you can't pontificate. i'm saying flat out, there's no clause about changing his name in the contract & i'd bet everything i have on that

  • What you are saying is you DON'T KNOW. So you CANNOT criticize the company for holding him liable to the contract. In other words, you are just running your mouth to pull the card of a big company picking on the young brutha. Stop it.

  • i admitted i don't know but i will say, with the highest degree of certainty that i can muster, that a legal name change wasn't a variable clause in the contract because no one saw that coming. if you'd say that you saw it coming you're either psychic or a liar. this nonsense about liability doesn't even apply because johnson hasn't breached anything or jeopardized reebok's ability to sell a product endorsed by the pitchman (johnson) because he changed his name. arguing that is dumb by you

  • If you get skilled enough to get an endorsement contract from one of the companies, well... maybe you will read the contract start to finish. Many don't - that's a fact.

  • irrespective of that, a skilled lawyer or agent did not not make any contingent provisions for some off the wall shit like changing one's name. there's very little precedent for that. shamgod wells never made an inpact on american pro ball, abdul jabbar was gone before big contracts, chris jackson never had that problem nor did tariq abdul wahad (olivier st john). don't scream "contract violation" when they never the rule to be broken in the 1st place. idiot

  • *they never wrote the rule to be broken...the idiot still stands though

  • Indeed!

  • reasonable people (not those with 20/20 hindsight like our rarelibra friend) would agree with me: legal name change isn't in the contract because NOBODY saw that 1 coming. so i suppose droning on about a contract is what's making rarelibra look dumb. then trying to attack another person's mental capacity on little or no basis is what's even more foolish. chomsky kicks serious ass btw

  • Dude, you need to harness that energy into a positive measure. Serious. You walk around and talk the talk like all street lawyers, but you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground to the facts of the case. Thus, you ASSume too much.

  • street lawyers? harness energy? i presented & supported an argument. nothing more. like the other cat said, the burden of proof is upon you. here are the facts, he gets fucked with all the time, you & i didn't read the contract, precedents regarding name changes have been set, the likelihood of the name change clause voiding a contract is minimal. i'm waiting for you to present something other than condescending rhetoric

  • You didn't properly present an argument, as you HAVE NO PROOF. So stop trying to make something out of nothing. He had a contract, he had an obligation - you don't know him, you don't know the contract, you don't know anything else but running your mouth and trying to point out the 'big bad corporation'. Until you have the EXPERIENCE or the know how, stop flapping your jibs.

  • i presented an argument just fine. you screamed contract & i told you why you were wrong. if you can run your mouth, i can run my mouth. this is america. you don't have the 'big bad corp.' experience either. on youtube, no one does. so either present (put up) or concede (shut up).

  • You know NOTHING about who I am, who I work for, or what experience I have. You are just someone running your mouth.

  • you & i are the same in that respect. you don't know who i work for or my experience. therefore, you're just someone running your mouth as well. the difference lies in rhetorical prowess & your lack thereof. present evidence if you may. since it's the internet, you can offer concrete or anecdotal. BUT, ad hominem attacks won't secure your case. i'll wait

  • He's a product.

  • It's a shame that this dumbass isn't working in Reebok's marketing department. It's just absolutely amazing how Reebok overlooked the tremendous profit it could've made by selling both names' jerseys.

  • If he had a cotract with Reebok to make "C. Johnson" jerseys, he should have to reimburse them.

    And of course, whatshisname there says its racist. This jerk says everything is racist, every one of these young turk vids I watch he does it.

  • Ocho Cinco should sue back for civil rights... not for race but for the freedom to change his name. and i don't think he should be fine for that.. This is AMERICA...

  • I mean he shouldn't be fine.. typo!!!!!

  • wht da fuck is wrong with OCHO CINCO ???

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more