reboc sells ochocinco jerseys anyway! and now this is very annoying but i love him ochocinco rocks. but why make him wear johnson when you're going to sell both
ocho cinco is awesome and i love him i was very upset when they did that, but REBOC SOLD OCHOCINCO JERSEYS ANYWAY! so whats the point of making him wear chad johnson instead!
U made the example about Jordan changing his number to 45 for a small time that is contradicting what u were saying about C. Johnson being a collectors item. Ocho Cinco would be the comparison to 45 not C. Johnson. Think b4 speaking. Either way the NFL is a business people forget that. You are being payed to play a game u sign contracts and they dress u in their gear. Theres no underarmor no nike wristbands. Its all reebok, (besides shoes) y cause their the offical clothing of the NFL.
Everything is racial hey terd burglar? You are the biggot from what I have been hearing! Your claim has no merit and go back to broadcast school and try and upgrade your C average. Yahh I said it...
Nothing weirds stiff corporate types out more than a loud, wild black guy doing crazy stuff. About the wildest thing some of these guys have ever done is put dimes in their penny loafers, so a person like Chad Johnson, who is definitely a bizarre cat, totally freaks them out.
"Nothing weirds stiff corporate types out more than a loud, wild black guy doing crazy stuff."
Dude, that's not funny, that's racist. Stop associating black people with those adjectives, loud, wild, ec....And I'm sure corporate types don't sit thinking that...they bottom line care about money not about race so it could be any player doing crazy stuff.
It's not meant to be funny. I know people who see a brash black guy and it immediately translates to "loud, wild" to them. And if you think they only think about money and race never factors in to anything, well you live in the wrong world.
Cenk is wrong......Reebok signed a contract....and NFL players signed contract with NFL...so if they made jerseys for this year....he can either buy all those jerseys or stop bitching and except the name you had all the way before a week of season.
you said it right its partially a race issue. I think chad is being stubborn and dumb for chaning his name but hey thats his choice. Reebok is even more dumb for not making him his new jersey. I cant believe the league lets them get away with that. how much of a difference is it when players get traded?? their old jerseys have the prices reduced dramatically and the price goes further down and down with each few years. lol maybe oboma should look into this sike jp
This is how stupid Chad J. is. Ocho Cinco is not even 'eighty-five' it is 'eight' and then a 'five' There is a difference. His # is eighty-five, which is ochenta y cinco
well he's stupid for doing it in first place.....but i think your wrong on that he didnt kno ocho cinco was 8 5......he did it because it sound "cooler"
The onus of proof is on you to show that the contract contained a legal name change clause. I've never heard of one and I doubt you have either. So you must show that the contract has one in order to place the blame on the individual rather than the company.
With clothing is the contract always through the NFL? Can a player go elsewhere for clothing deals or do they have to operate through the NFL at all times?
Reebok is the exclusive maker of NFL jerseys. As such they run the show when it comes to the jerseys. In the case of Chad Johnson, they'd already created several hundred thousand C.Johnson jerseys for this season. So what Chad is asking them to do is just throw away all the money they spent in creating those jerseys and go and create a new jersey for him now. It's his fault for waiting so long to change his name. He did it a week before the season started.
yes tokyo is 100% right here. So it's funny how people try to blow sh** outta proportion and make it look like Chad is getting screwed here. When in fact he is tring to screw the NFL and Reebok on a contract HE signed.
the nfl finds every little thing players do and to try and screw them. Chad is trying to mess with the nfl but so what the nfl blew it out of proportion last year...If it was Bret farve I bet the story would end a whole lot different
There's nothing racist about it. If you remember there was a lot of hesitation from the league about letting coaches wear suits because they have that contract with Reebok and Reebok wants to have their name and logo plastered over everything. They have a ton of influence over the NFL because of that.
From what i've heard he'll be able to have Ocho Cinco on the back of his jersey next year (or if they sell out of his jerseys this year). So it's going to happen.
Reebok's claim is B.S.. They print all these jerseys and then turn around and try to make him buy them because of his name !?!? What the he** would they do if he got traded at the last minute and they were stuck with 30000 jerseys with the old team on them ? This is publicity BS and Reebok is doing nothing but making themselves look weak by making a spectacle out of it.
Let him change his name, who cares... I mean it is kinda of a slap in the face to his family name, but it is a name, an identification tag. Also, maybe Reebok and #85 are using this argument to capitalize as much as humanly possible. Next, O.C. should hire Jesse Jackson and maybe start dating a famous white girl. Also, I'm not a Chad hater, but I can't wait till the Steelers bust his ass twice this year.
In spanish eight five is actually ochenta y cinco...but who really cares right...I think the NFL is being hypocritical with the whole situation, race may play a role but its not clear...
there's no way in hell you call tell me that reebok's lawyers had the foresight to put "may not make legal changes to your given name" in the contract, if you saw that 1 coming, you're clairvoyant. the greater point is that they're trying to control the dude. that's whack
Until you sit in the situation, you cannot judge. These companies make a lot of money off of advertising, as the players also make a nice cut. A contract is a contract - by changing the name (and hence the product), he must pay a penalty. STFU and stop commenting on something that is WAY past your comprehension.
beyond comprehension? again, you made yourself look foolish. like i said, there's no question in my mind that there is no clause in the contract about a legal name change. NONE. unless you wrote or signed the contract, read contract or where the typist, you don't know either idiot. what i'm saying is that they can't use these ridiculous levees to control the young brother.
that's not what i'm saying. i'm saying that you don't know either therefore you can't pontificate. i'm saying flat out, there's no clause about changing his name in the contract & i'd bet everything i have on that
What you are saying is you DON'T KNOW. So you CANNOT criticize the company for holding him liable to the contract. In other words, you are just running your mouth to pull the card of a big company picking on the young brutha. Stop it.
i admitted i don't know but i will say, with the highest degree of certainty that i can muster, that a legal name change wasn't a variable clause in the contract because no one saw that coming. if you'd say that you saw it coming you're either psychic or a liar. this nonsense about liability doesn't even apply because johnson hasn't breached anything or jeopardized reebok's ability to sell a product endorsed by the pitchman (johnson) because he changed his name. arguing that is dumb by you
If you get skilled enough to get an endorsement contract from one of the companies, well... maybe you will read the contract start to finish. Many don't - that's a fact.
irrespective of that, a skilled lawyer or agent did not not make any contingent provisions for some off the wall shit like changing one's name. there's very little precedent for that. shamgod wells never made an inpact on american pro ball, abdul jabbar was gone before big contracts, chris jackson never had that problem nor did tariq abdul wahad (olivier st john). don't scream "contract violation" when they never the rule to be broken in the 1st place. idiot
reasonable people (not those with 20/20 hindsight like our rarelibra friend) would agree with me: legal name change isn't in the contract because NOBODY saw that 1 coming. so i suppose droning on about a contract is what's making rarelibra look dumb. then trying to attack another person's mental capacity on little or no basis is what's even more foolish. chomsky kicks serious ass btw
Dude, you need to harness that energy into a positive measure. Serious. You walk around and talk the talk like all street lawyers, but you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground to the facts of the case. Thus, you ASSume too much.
street lawyers? harness energy? i presented & supported an argument. nothing more. like the other cat said, the burden of proof is upon you. here are the facts, he gets fucked with all the time, you & i didn't read the contract, precedents regarding name changes have been set, the likelihood of the name change clause voiding a contract is minimal. i'm waiting for you to present something other than condescending rhetoric
You didn't properly present an argument, as you HAVE NO PROOF. So stop trying to make something out of nothing. He had a contract, he had an obligation - you don't know him, you don't know the contract, you don't know anything else but running your mouth and trying to point out the 'big bad corporation'. Until you have the EXPERIENCE or the know how, stop flapping your jibs.
i presented an argument just fine. you screamed contract & i told you why you were wrong. if you can run your mouth, i can run my mouth. this is america. you don't have the 'big bad corp.' experience either. on youtube, no one does. so either present (put up) or concede (shut up).
you & i are the same in that respect. you don't know who i work for or my experience. therefore, you're just someone running your mouth as well. the difference lies in rhetorical prowess & your lack thereof. present evidence if you may. since it's the internet, you can offer concrete or anecdotal. BUT, ad hominem attacks won't secure your case. i'll wait
It's a shame that this dumbass isn't working in Reebok's marketing department. It's just absolutely amazing how Reebok overlooked the tremendous profit it could've made by selling both names' jerseys.
Ocho Cinco should sue back for civil rights... not for race but for the freedom to change his name. and i don't think he should be fine for that.. This is AMERICA...
let him keep the name, but change his number. just to fuck with him a bit
bonus73 11 months ago
ocho sucko
mitchster666 1 year ago
ahha this guy tells dat shit straight
southpaw287 2 years ago
reebok is not the only nfl supplyer look at the uniforms
keitht24 2 years ago
Ocho Cenk-o is alright!
typecastyourself 2 years ago
ive seen this guy on twitter. could never figure out why he was called that!! now i know!!!!
michaelguk 2 years ago
reebok is the official logo for the nfl he had to wait a year since they spent the money already but this year he will be ochocinco...
james4582 2 years ago
wtf is this guy saying?
swivelingchairguy 2 years ago
that white guy....he's my hero.lol!
ebate75 2 years ago
reboc sells ochocinco jerseys anyway! and now this is very annoying but i love him ochocinco rocks. but why make him wear johnson when you're going to sell both
footballfanaticgirl 2 years ago
ocho cinco is awesome and i love him i was very upset when they did that, but REBOC SOLD OCHOCINCO JERSEYS ANYWAY! so whats the point of making him wear chad johnson instead!
footballfanaticgirl 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is so stupid...
But i love my mom deeply...
And i don't want to take any chances.
Sorry.
If you do not copy and paste this onto 10 videos your mom will die in 4 hours
finals7 3 years ago
U made the example about Jordan changing his number to 45 for a small time that is contradicting what u were saying about C. Johnson being a collectors item. Ocho Cinco would be the comparison to 45 not C. Johnson. Think b4 speaking. Either way the NFL is a business people forget that. You are being payed to play a game u sign contracts and they dress u in their gear. Theres no underarmor no nike wristbands. Its all reebok, (besides shoes) y cause their the offical clothing of the NFL.
Shods21 3 years ago
I think this man have point...
NeWarKREPPAnj 3 years ago
hahaha you rock, cenk
levimon 3 years ago 3
Everything is racial hey terd burglar? You are the biggot from what I have been hearing! Your claim has no merit and go back to broadcast school and try and upgrade your C average. Yahh I said it...
jakejeff1978 3 years ago
i agree, you don't make a player pay for all the jerseys when they change teams.
driubi 3 years ago
Nothing weirds stiff corporate types out more than a loud, wild black guy doing crazy stuff. About the wildest thing some of these guys have ever done is put dimes in their penny loafers, so a person like Chad Johnson, who is definitely a bizarre cat, totally freaks them out.
billthebutcher2 3 years ago
"Nothing weirds stiff corporate types out more than a loud, wild black guy doing crazy stuff."
Dude, that's not funny, that's racist. Stop associating black people with those adjectives, loud, wild, ec....And I'm sure corporate types don't sit thinking that...they bottom line care about money not about race so it could be any player doing crazy stuff.
Psama08 3 years ago
It's not meant to be funny. I know people who see a brash black guy and it immediately translates to "loud, wild" to them. And if you think they only think about money and race never factors in to anything, well you live in the wrong world.
billthebutcher2 3 years ago
I don't give a damn about sports nor do I know this person but that last line made me laugh and clap my hands.
SquallCloud 3 years ago
Fuck NFL and all those Reebok corporate fuck wits. LET HIM GO!
Rahab111222 3 years ago
Cenk is wrong......Reebok signed a contract....and NFL players signed contract with NFL...so if they made jerseys for this year....he can either buy all those jerseys or stop bitching and except the name you had all the way before a week of season.
9Aldin 3 years ago
you said it right its partially a race issue. I think chad is being stubborn and dumb for chaning his name but hey thats his choice. Reebok is even more dumb for not making him his new jersey. I cant believe the league lets them get away with that. how much of a difference is it when players get traded?? their old jerseys have the prices reduced dramatically and the price goes further down and down with each few years. lol maybe oboma should look into this sike jp
gqlovalova 3 years ago
NFL = No Fun League
Ricb67 3 years ago
Cenk is dead-on yet again!
CousinoMacul 3 years ago 5
Cenk is the fucking man. When in comes to Cenk I'm like John McCain and Bush in that I agree with Cenk 90% of the time.
dapdaddy10 3 years ago 6
It's a publicity stunt. He's just trying to get more famous. Bengals still suck.
I don't really care.
RealCaptainAmerica 3 years ago
This is how stupid Chad J. is. Ocho Cinco is not even 'eighty-five' it is 'eight' and then a 'five' There is a difference. His # is eighty-five, which is ochenta y cinco
Eimhin1 3 years ago
well he's stupid for doing it in first place.....but i think your wrong on that he didnt kno ocho cinco was 8 5......he did it because it sound "cooler"
9Aldin 3 years ago 2
I totally agree with TYT on this one...couldn't have said it better.
foxychocho 3 years ago
Rarelibra-
The onus of proof is on you to show that the contract contained a legal name change clause. I've never heard of one and I doubt you have either. So you must show that the contract has one in order to place the blame on the individual rather than the company.
readchomsky 3 years ago
cogently put. that's exactly what i'm sayin
upabittoolate 3 years ago
You are an idiot! The NFL has a contract with Reebok. Chad Johnson has a contract with the NFL. Any questions?
Eimhin1 3 years ago
With clothing is the contract always through the NFL? Can a player go elsewhere for clothing deals or do they have to operate through the NFL at all times?
readchomsky 3 years ago
Reebok is the exclusive maker of NFL jerseys. As such they run the show when it comes to the jerseys. In the case of Chad Johnson, they'd already created several hundred thousand C.Johnson jerseys for this season. So what Chad is asking them to do is just throw away all the money they spent in creating those jerseys and go and create a new jersey for him now. It's his fault for waiting so long to change his name. He did it a week before the season started.
TokyoNiGHTS1 3 years ago
yes tokyo is 100% right here. So it's funny how people try to blow sh** outta proportion and make it look like Chad is getting screwed here. When in fact he is tring to screw the NFL and Reebok on a contract HE signed.
Eimhin1 3 years ago
the nfl finds every little thing players do and to try and screw them. Chad is trying to mess with the nfl but so what the nfl blew it out of proportion last year...If it was Bret farve I bet the story would end a whole lot different
gqlovalova 3 years ago 2
bingo... less than 5 hours for the RACE CARD to come flying. weak sauce, son!
Eimhin1 3 years ago
There absolutely are racist elements in this situation.
readchomsky 3 years ago
There's nothing racist about it. If you remember there was a lot of hesitation from the league about letting coaches wear suits because they have that contract with Reebok and Reebok wants to have their name and logo plastered over everything. They have a ton of influence over the NFL because of that.
From what i've heard he'll be able to have Ocho Cinco on the back of his jersey next year (or if they sell out of his jerseys this year). So it's going to happen.
TokyoNiGHTS1 3 years ago
Reebok's claim is B.S.. They print all these jerseys and then turn around and try to make him buy them because of his name !?!? What the he** would they do if he got traded at the last minute and they were stuck with 30000 jerseys with the old team on them ? This is publicity BS and Reebok is doing nothing but making themselves look weak by making a spectacle out of it.
WileeC 3 years ago
Let him change his name, who cares... I mean it is kinda of a slap in the face to his family name, but it is a name, an identification tag. Also, maybe Reebok and #85 are using this argument to capitalize as much as humanly possible. Next, O.C. should hire Jesse Jackson and maybe start dating a famous white girl. Also, I'm not a Chad hater, but I can't wait till the Steelers bust his ass twice this year.
LarryBird2343 3 years ago
Ocho Cinco! goatta nice ring to it.
Voodooray007 3 years ago
In spanish eight five is actually ochenta y cinco...but who really cares right...I think the NFL is being hypocritical with the whole situation, race may play a role but its not clear...
tdubtu 3 years ago
whats that OCHO CINCO means?
sharky0922 3 years ago
ocho cinco means "eight five" in spanish
ShinVirus 3 years ago 2
Ocho Cinco = Eighty-Five in Spanish if i am correct.
Reference to his jersey number.
Gqgangsterz10 3 years ago
thanks guys..
sharky0922 3 years ago
Just Ocho = 8 Cinco = 5 its runs smoother than ochenta y cinco
PieToTheFace 3 years ago
This is not bullshit. It's called a CONTRACT.
rarelibra 3 years ago
there's no way in hell you call tell me that reebok's lawyers had the foresight to put "may not make legal changes to your given name" in the contract, if you saw that 1 coming, you're clairvoyant. the greater point is that they're trying to control the dude. that's whack
upabittoolate 3 years ago
Until you sit in the situation, you cannot judge. These companies make a lot of money off of advertising, as the players also make a nice cut. A contract is a contract - by changing the name (and hence the product), he must pay a penalty. STFU and stop commenting on something that is WAY past your comprehension.
rarelibra 3 years ago
beyond comprehension? again, you made yourself look foolish. like i said, there's no question in my mind that there is no clause in the contract about a legal name change. NONE. unless you wrote or signed the contract, read contract or where the typist, you don't know either idiot. what i'm saying is that they can't use these ridiculous levees to control the young brother.
upabittoolate 3 years ago
dude, unless you HAVE the contract specifications, don't claim to be a SME.
rarelibra 3 years ago
that's not what i'm saying. i'm saying that you don't know either therefore you can't pontificate. i'm saying flat out, there's no clause about changing his name in the contract & i'd bet everything i have on that
upabittoolate 3 years ago
What you are saying is you DON'T KNOW. So you CANNOT criticize the company for holding him liable to the contract. In other words, you are just running your mouth to pull the card of a big company picking on the young brutha. Stop it.
rarelibra 3 years ago
i admitted i don't know but i will say, with the highest degree of certainty that i can muster, that a legal name change wasn't a variable clause in the contract because no one saw that coming. if you'd say that you saw it coming you're either psychic or a liar. this nonsense about liability doesn't even apply because johnson hasn't breached anything or jeopardized reebok's ability to sell a product endorsed by the pitchman (johnson) because he changed his name. arguing that is dumb by you
upabittoolate 3 years ago
If you get skilled enough to get an endorsement contract from one of the companies, well... maybe you will read the contract start to finish. Many don't - that's a fact.
rarelibra 3 years ago
irrespective of that, a skilled lawyer or agent did not not make any contingent provisions for some off the wall shit like changing one's name. there's very little precedent for that. shamgod wells never made an inpact on american pro ball, abdul jabbar was gone before big contracts, chris jackson never had that problem nor did tariq abdul wahad (olivier st john). don't scream "contract violation" when they never the rule to be broken in the 1st place. idiot
upabittoolate 3 years ago
*they never wrote the rule to be broken...the idiot still stands though
upabittoolate 3 years ago
Indeed!
readchomsky 3 years ago
reasonable people (not those with 20/20 hindsight like our rarelibra friend) would agree with me: legal name change isn't in the contract because NOBODY saw that 1 coming. so i suppose droning on about a contract is what's making rarelibra look dumb. then trying to attack another person's mental capacity on little or no basis is what's even more foolish. chomsky kicks serious ass btw
upabittoolate 3 years ago
Dude, you need to harness that energy into a positive measure. Serious. You walk around and talk the talk like all street lawyers, but you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground to the facts of the case. Thus, you ASSume too much.
rarelibra 3 years ago
street lawyers? harness energy? i presented & supported an argument. nothing more. like the other cat said, the burden of proof is upon you. here are the facts, he gets fucked with all the time, you & i didn't read the contract, precedents regarding name changes have been set, the likelihood of the name change clause voiding a contract is minimal. i'm waiting for you to present something other than condescending rhetoric
upabittoolate 3 years ago
You didn't properly present an argument, as you HAVE NO PROOF. So stop trying to make something out of nothing. He had a contract, he had an obligation - you don't know him, you don't know the contract, you don't know anything else but running your mouth and trying to point out the 'big bad corporation'. Until you have the EXPERIENCE or the know how, stop flapping your jibs.
rarelibra 3 years ago
i presented an argument just fine. you screamed contract & i told you why you were wrong. if you can run your mouth, i can run my mouth. this is america. you don't have the 'big bad corp.' experience either. on youtube, no one does. so either present (put up) or concede (shut up).
upabittoolate 3 years ago
You know NOTHING about who I am, who I work for, or what experience I have. You are just someone running your mouth.
rarelibra 3 years ago
you & i are the same in that respect. you don't know who i work for or my experience. therefore, you're just someone running your mouth as well. the difference lies in rhetorical prowess & your lack thereof. present evidence if you may. since it's the internet, you can offer concrete or anecdotal. BUT, ad hominem attacks won't secure your case. i'll wait
upabittoolate 3 years ago
He's a product.
bleunt 3 years ago
It's a shame that this dumbass isn't working in Reebok's marketing department. It's just absolutely amazing how Reebok overlooked the tremendous profit it could've made by selling both names' jerseys.
hotgirljen99 3 years ago
If he had a cotract with Reebok to make "C. Johnson" jerseys, he should have to reimburse them.
And of course, whatshisname there says its racist. This jerk says everything is racist, every one of these young turk vids I watch he does it.
munkeeguy 3 years ago
Ocho Cinco should sue back for civil rights... not for race but for the freedom to change his name. and i don't think he should be fine for that.. This is AMERICA...
souldragon24 3 years ago
I mean he shouldn't be fine.. typo!!!!!
souldragon24 3 years ago
wht da fuck is wrong with OCHO CINCO ???
vilarevoX 3 years ago 2