SHAC destroy huntington life sciences

[onetwopussies]

Why do the Police act like Zombies? Don't they understand about animal sadistic torture.

The Cops must be on their payroll also.

[izziekioje]

@Roger1111111

Your a complete and utter IDIOT.

We brought cancer, STDs, diabetes and a bunch of other diseases upon ourselves.

How is it fair and correct to destroy animals in order to save ourselves, when we were the cause of everything in the first place?!!

Cancer and diseases are part our own self destruction and natures way of of thinning out the herd.

Don't you realize that the reason this planets dying is because of OVERPOPULATION and peoples ignorance like yourself.

Your the perfect exa

[Roger11111111]

@MrKrasfer fuck you you daft confussed dumb ass cunt, Im gunna stamp on your head then smash your fucking skull in, we need to experment on animals for cancer cures etc, youdaft fucking cunt, dont you understand, you thick cunt!!! are you that daft???? Im gunna go a kill a kitten just for a laugh, then shoot a few foxes, hahaha, fuck you to hell you daft fucking cunt!!! and death to your whole family you stupid mother fucker!

[tampabayismyhome]

@Roger11111111 fucking dumb ass animals are not people how is a rabbit or a dog anything like a human being. Do you know there have been 17 cures found for AIDS in monkeys and not one of them work on people.

They even found a cure for diabetes and guess what Not one of them work on people.

[noratmedicine]

“Animal studies are done for legal reasons and not for scientific reasons. The predictive value of such studies for man is meaningless.”; - Dr James D. Gallagher; Director of Medical Research; Lederle Laboratories; Journal of the American Medical Association; March 14 1964.;

curedisease. net

[vinepez]

Shac will be getting it up the ass in the showers tonight hahahahahahahahaha

[Roger11111111]

Long live HLS and death to every animal!!!! Fuck you SHAC!! bunch of confused cunts!!!

[humanmedforhumans]

and HLS know it si a fraud..."The best guess for the correlation of adverse reactions between human and animal toxicity data is somewhere between 5% and 25%" and "90% of our work is done for legal and not for scientific reasons". curedisease. net

[mrdojob]

lol i have no problem if people debate it like humans should and not act like the animals they want to protect. Debate it with them and not attack them.

Anyone who replies to this comments with death wishes on me/family, swears at me, or just offends me on purpous in any way will result in an animal being shot and killed for each comment. Im NOT tolerating any more threats. If you love animals don't won't even try.

[whitechurch16]

fuck you! this is where my money come from :)

[Owlhousespecial]

Finish the filthy scummy workers cars off so they have to walk to work. Then protest in front of their face, they DONT deserve life comforts and such like cars anyway, just like the animals dont get any life comforts u should rob them of them.

Thumbs up this comment and maby it will be seen and the idea will then be seen :D

[layladogtrainer]

I would rather die than hurt an animal and i would rather die than take anything that has been tested on animals...im a vegan,beagle lover makeup free girl!

[wirrWar76]

@ howcynicalofme...

Yes, we have to test it on humans cause humans use the products!

- no animal is like humans, we are animals too but no animal is like ourselve and so: NO test on animals will give you the secure you want. there are a lot of examples for this!

-there are other methods for testing...they are less expensive and they don't bring cruelty to any individuum!

-a lot of tests are done from people who want to become a greater popularity NOT to help humans!

[wirrWar76]

-the industry who "produces" animals for testing wants this form of testing...they earn their money with this practices and so animal free testing versions are not loved by them! but they are usable for a lot of tests!!!

-who gives human animals the right to do this shit?!?

there are so many more things I could tell you...please don't look only for your life, animals could feel pain like you and there are many ways to take them in secure!

[wirrWar76]

Why don't you want them in secure?

Sorry for my English...hope you understand!

[craig1377]

I hope that this does come to an end, I would gladly go to jail for getting just one of the scum bags who torture these poor animals!!

I already have a criminal record for something I did towards a bastard who tests on animals and I am PROUD of it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think that all the scum who test on animals need to be tested on instead of the animals!!!

[howcynicalofme]

you wouldn't say that if you're mom was suffering from an illness that needed procedure based on animal testing.

[craig1377]

Yes I would cos when my Grandmother was dying from cancer I begged her not to accept any medication, as I knew it was tested on animals.

[hazmaman]

at 6:14 there is a slight little typo, you have just watched complete bollocks in the making, you animal rights protesters havent got a leg to stand on. HLS have the police on their side, they have the government on their side and you protestors havent got anyone, you were screwed from the beginning

[marilyn897]

look how happy those beagles are when they get rescued i just cannot believe things like this happen in the year 2009

[gaelicscots]

My father had his life saved by a triple heart bypass, this is a procedure that was devloped and continually perfected by animal testing.

My grandfather had an artery replaced with a cow artery.

keep up the good work huntingdon and dont let these horrible, horrible protesters hinder your life saving research.

HUMAN RIGHTS OVER ANMAL RIGHTS

[studywar]

Life saving? Huntingdon does no research of its own. They are a contract animal testing lab, which means they test anything for any company, including cosmetics, bleach, detergent, and artificial coffee sweetener (nearly 14,000 animals were killed by Huntingdon to test the sweetener Splenda.)

[howcynicalofme]

so if we don't test these, are we going to test them on humans? what if the products have flause? should they just sell them in the market? then see millions of people suffer? cosmetics, bleach, detergent, etc etc all these things we need for our daily life. do we have to stop using them just to make these animals happy? if so, you shouldn't use anything that has been tested on animals. which is impossible because i bet you've used thousands.

[studywar]

wow, um...First of all, the majority of today's cosmetic or household cleaner companies don't test on animals for those products anymore, because there are sophisticated non-animal method technologies to test safety the safety of chemicals. And its pretty obvious what going to happen if you put bleach in your eye or swallow it...is society that dumb to need to test it on a dog and when the dog dies from swallowing it, do we go....ohh, I saw a different ending to that...

[howcynicalofme]

so why are all these people protesting?

[howcynicalofme]

other thing,

you can't just judge things by testing "things" based on theories. without testing the actual products on a real subject, you'll never know what will happen. let's say that they've found this new way to cheapen production fee by reducing certain chemicals. although there are assumptions, you'll never know what it will do to people. corporate companies don't want any lawsuits against them.

[howcynicalofme]

why do you think med schools for the last some what 200 years have been using real dead bodies for their studies. they already know all the knowledge behind human bodies. however, without actually experiencing the real thing you'll never know what will happen.

[Nakisai]

whats the song they use for this video?

[Sardar1202]

Realy Good Job guys

[vinniebaby1]

Does that mean you will not give me your dogs email address?

[MokomaSusi]

Are you christian? must be. What you need to (since you are so smart) to have to reduce human population in earth. There is already too many people in earth...you think we should save more lifes?

Hard fact is that earth cannot support 10 or maybe even 20 billion humans. Diseases are here for reason...

If you are christian you should not use any medicines at all. Since using medicine is fighting against your god's will.

[vinniebaby1]

And of course you're a know it all European who lives in a sardine can and drives a tiny car.

[rockergod789]

are you saying that i'm going to hell for using anti-depression medication? for using anti-viral drugs when i had mono? for using painkillers when i'm suffering from pain? you're the biggest disgrace of a christian i've seen!

perhaps you would be happier in a world like in Logan's Run, where everyone is killed on their 30th birthday!

A PLAGUE ON YOU AND YOUR FAMILY!!!

[h1satsu]

Good job guys.

[airemember]

Actually some of Chinese medicine can be used. For instance my dad was diabetic and he was cured from Eastern medicine without using insulin. Also knowing what to eat can prevent us from getting cancer, diabetic etc. Some of traditional medicines are good enough to cure people believe or not. Problems are where consumers who support those companies are not informed like what is going on at Testing lab.

[anuataram]

SHAC rules!

[asdfgk]

man this is gay

[soulchanter]

just like your dad fucking test tube baby!

[deathtothestate]

anyone know what the name of the techno piece is? and who its by? thanks

[vinniebaby1]

must be another liberal whack job, foul language is about the only thing they know how to do good.

[vinniebaby1]

Animal research was an absolute necessity in the role of virtually every major medical advance of the last century. Many major developments that led to Nobel Prizes involved animal research, including the development of penicillin (mice), organ transplant (dogs), and work on poliomyelitis that led to a vaccine (mice, monkeys). Too bad we cannot purposely infect all animal loving lunatics with the diseases listed above & withhold the medicine needed for the cure.

[MUFC50th]

Du liebst keine Tiere oder? Du bis ein Herzloses Stück shit! FUCK OFF!!!

[danwill99]

Sorry , I don't speak much German.

please translate into english , or fuck off your self.

[deathtothestate]

Heart bypass operations were put off cos they DIDNT work on dogs, penicillin was nearly scrapped cos it killed other animals and that vaccine is a lie. Flipping a coin is more effective than Animal Test results. Go back and do your homework.

[vinniebaby1]

Facts are facts, your comments are based on what YOU think is wrong, not science. Now you do your homework by leaving your emotions at the door.

[deathtothestate]

no my comments are based on science, don't wander from what i was saying, i just gave you the facts that drugs and operations that save millions of HUMANS would not have been passed if Animal Tests were reliable. The relevance of the results are only 40% accurate therefore flipping a coin (50:50) would actually be more effective

[danwill99]

DOS , while I do not enjoy subjecting animals to suffering , they are the only thing we have until completely reliable computer modeling is available.

And even then it will not be able to compensate for unusual reactions.

[deathtothestate]

they are a danger to humans because they are so inaccurate, seriously, read into it and you'll find out that it's all done so drug companies can make money faster without having to be safe, SHAC is a scientific campaign and not an emotional one

[GerbilUSA2nd]

Penicillin was an accident. He didn't use animal testing to find it. He left the fungi (penicillin) on samples of bacteria and found that it killed them.

[danwill99]

What vaccine is a lie?

[deathtothestate]

SHAC are awesome

[vinniebaby1]

neocon? laughing, where did that come from?

[goingemoguy]

liberal screwballs? laughing, where did that come from?

[vinniebaby1]

Hurting animals...boo hoo, this is the holocaust all over again, hee heee. Yeah right, what is the purpose of research using animals, torture? hee heee...l I love animals, they're delicious.

[Jimisonjons]

vinniebaby I hope you get chemicals shoved down your throat and get dissected alive you neocon "whack job"!

So what if non-humans arent humans?! They are SENTIENT beings and that is all that matters.

[vinniebaby1]

laughing again at liberal screwballs who continually hold animals in higher regard than humans. Supernads...hey dipshit, not all humans are bad, some of us actually put up with idiots like yourself.

[badboydeano]

Do you see any reference to anyone in this video saying ALL humans are bad? Take your dipshit propaganda attitude elsewhere you heartless ignorant piece of shit!

[PC12345]

fuck off vinnie!

[vinniebaby1]

Mark twain was an idiot! Animals are just that, animals! Give me the email address to your pet dog or cat, I want to tell them they have a dumbass for an owner!

[goingveg]

"I am not interested to know whether vivisection produces results that are profitable to the human race or doesn't...The pain which it inflicts upon unconsenting animals is the basis of my enmity toward it, and it is to me sufficient justification of the enmity without looking further."  -Mark Twain

[goingveg]

Again it does not benefit the advancement of medical research. If you have information on humans why go back to animals. It doesn't make sense. This is not necessary!

[Ghorghor]

Fucking vivisection!!

[jendayilee]

If we want to find cures for human ills then we should stick to specificity and test on humans.

[PC12345]

what the hell your just asdfgk

[goingveg]

Animal Tests bring no benefit to mankind. 100,000 people every year of products tested on animals because they are terrubly misleading.

[goingveg]

I have heard that we should test on animals because they benefit man. Then why don't we test on humans. Because it is inhumane, in the same way it is inhumane to tests on animals.

[goingveg]

It does not matter if they can reason or if they have thought, what matters is if they can suffer. That is my reason for equality.

[Nayr747]

Go ALF!

[mikecooke]

the laws being passed to try to stop us are doing nothing but showing that those in power are afraid of us, and in the words of the amazing Ian Mckay " atleast i am fucking trying, what the fuck have you done"?

[mikecooke]

vegans and activists keep up the good work the words mean nothing in the end they know science has alternatives and they will always try to justify the sanctity of life argument. we are nothing more than beasts PERIOD. While they sit back and with never do anything but be a critic, you take a pair of boltcutters and a bullhorn.

[PC12345]

vinniebaby1 your a bloody hypocrite! You will justify animal experiments on the premise that "animals are so similar to us,we can get cures from them";then to deflect any moral criticism you will say "oh there just animals".Your a contradicting tosser(translation:idiot).

[vinniebaby1]

Again you prove my point concerning the confusion of the animal rights whack jobs....like yourself. Your pet dog or cat and human being are not the same. They are just animals and just one facet of research in finding cures for disease.

[goingveg]

They are not just lab equipment they are living beings who deserve to live just as much as u or me. What gives us the right?

[veganrockchick]

vinniebaby1- i assume you are aware that animal research has very little relation in results to human bilogy what so ever. So your actually endangering humans by using results from animal tested research.

[vinniebaby1]

i love animal....they're delicious

[reefhead]

got nothing better to reply with? since ur ok with animal research to "save lives of humans" then u wouldnt mind being my test subject for the greater good of mankind now would u? humans are animals too u ignorant cunt.

[vinniebaby1]

We are NOT like your pet dog or cat, let me repeat, we are NOT like your pet dog or cat. When are idiots like you going to realize this. If you're so against animal abuse, where do you stand on abortion which is even worse. I'd rather save a human life through animal research than see a baby aborted.

[badboydeano]

If so then why don't you go and protest against doctors who give women abortions then asshole? Or havn't you got the balls like these brave people have? ALF stands for Animal liberation, nowhere in that do I see humans having to be mentioned. Humans have rights and still have lots of organisations helping them and all you can do is put down an animal rights group? You should be ashamed of yourself.

[GerbilUSA2nd]

So you think there is no value for life unless it's human? Your smarter so you have rights to kill them? If you really did follow that logic then teachers would be eating small children and we'd be vivisecting babies. Doesn't that sound wrong? Most of these people are probably against abortion too.

[vinniebaby1]

I do not value animals more than human life. Give me your dogs email address so I can tell him he has moron for an owner.

[GerbilUSA2nd]

How do you even know your smarter? We couldn't even hold a cup without thumbs. Human life has no value. We destroy our world, kill animals, destroy forests. We are death, we cause death, we are the only species with wars. All of us cause death, the difference is you promote it. You say this horrible vivisection is right. How would your god think of you, saying torturing his creations is right.

[vinniebaby1]

But we stupid humans did provide assholes like you a computer so you can make total fools of yourself.

[GerbilUSA2nd]

excatley

[vinniebaby1]

Again, the liberal nut-jobs such as yourself have spoken. Since when has the use of animals to cure cancer become commerce? Curing people of disease is commerce? bla bla bla....I guess we could use humans to find cures for all that ails mankind...finding cures for people is injustice? my god, to value your pet dog more than human life...wow

[badboydeano]

Vinnie do you know that testing on dogs can help find a cure for cancer in humans? Can you prove it? How many millions more will they have to torture to find that cure? Why havn't they alread?

[vinniebaby1]

This is the confusion of the animal rights crowd, that would make dogs and cats equal with human life. And breaking in and entering private property? who gave these people the right to break the law? they think they are above the law. I'd rather support the deaths of some animals if we can save countless human lives. Some of these law breaking wack jobs will get cancer or other life threatening disease, I say withhold all medicene that was developed using animals and let em all die.

[mikecooke]

that shows that you are on the side of torture with that ridiculous comment at the end " let them die" those words are not hurtful to me but the animals you are okaying the inhumane slaughter of. yes we are all wackjobs. bla bla bla I have heard this neo dribble so many times, laws are inplace to support the lawbreakers. If you feel I am wrong I would be happy to go through a vast list of the great laws set in place through out the years to keep commerce ahead of injustice.

[ALFJAG]

SMASH HLS

come on the mighty shac

[asdfgk]

What the hell they're just dogs

[mikecooke]

that is amazing

[pongop]

and the young people tortured in the holocaust were just kids.

yes, they're dogs, and they have the same physiological capacity for pain as any humans.

i can't believe someone could watch that video and see what they do to those dogs and other animals, and say something like you did. what is wrong with you?

[robfdavis1971]

It is good to get this footage out. What they don't tell in the video is how many dogs and cats used in experiments are stolen from people's back yards, taken from "free to good home" ads, and picked up at kennels across the US. Regardless if a dog or cat was raised for experiments, it is still cruel what goes on in the industry. Dogs have the capacity to feel pain just as humans...I hope you never have to scream for your life as these dogs do and as holocaust victims did.

[TheGregorian]

What's the deal with comparing what happens at HLS with the holocaust? In the holocaust, humans were tortured and killed, not dogs. BIG difference.

[robfdavis1971]

There is no difference. All species feel pain. Just because we are human does not give use the "right" to tortue innocent lives. Your comment is the exact mindset that rationalizes this type of torture and treatment.

[TheGregorian]

You say that there's no difference between a human life and a dog's. I'm wondering, if you had to choose between two dogs being tortured and killed and one human being tortured and killed, would you honestly choose to kill the human?

[robfdavis1971]

The lifeboat question.... hypothetical and misses the point that no species deserves to be tortured or killed. I would do what I could to save both. If it were my dogs I would give my life trying to save them.

[Nayr747]

Can you illistrate the difference? I will bet you you can't.... But I already know what you will say: 1) They're dogs not humans, 2) they're less intelligent than humans. In response to 1, if this is your ability to think, please go just off a bridge. And 2, what do you think about using human babies or mentally retarded people in this way?...

[TheGregorian]

The difference is as you stated in number 1. Basically, we draw the line of humanity in different places. You might grant human rights to animals, but perhaps not to insects. While others will draw the line to include even insects. I, however, draw the line to include only humans. But, it really doesn't matter much where the line is drawn. I only draw it where I do because it is more practical.

Would I torture and kill babies and/or mentally retarded people? No, of course not.

[Nayr747]

(1 of 2) That was not my question. Re-read it. Let me ask you this: Why is it wrong to kill a human? And let me ask you this: Does it seem reasonable that to deserve differing moral treatment there should be a differing characteristic that reasonably justifies this differing treatment?

[Nayr747]

My comments won't post. Stupid youtube!

[Nayr747]

(1 of 2) That wasn't my question. Re-read it. Let me ask you this: Why is it wrong to kill a human? And let me ask you this: Does it seem reasonable that to deserve differing moral treatment there should be a differing characteristic that reasonably justifies this differing treatment?

[TheGregorian]

It's wrong to kill humans because we have psychologically evolved the moral that killing humans is wrong. We evolved this way because it is/was beneficial to our survival. And, yes.

[Nayr747]

(2 of 2) The reason I say "reasonably justifies" is because it would not seem reasonable that eye color, skin color, or names such as "human" (that don't in themselves show a different characteristic in reality), etc, would justify differing moral treatment (i.e. a black person does not deserve to go to school because he is black). But there may be certain characteristic(s) that do reasonably justify different moral treatment.

[TheGregorian]

There are genetic differences between humans and other lifeforms which demand differences in treatment of the various lifeforms. Example: You might, but I wouldn't, treat dogs the same as humans. However, neither of us would treat bacteria the same as humans.

[Nayr747]

(3 of 2...) If you agree with the above, can you give this characteristic between humans and animals that reasonably justifies different moral treatment?

[Nayr747]

(My comment below was to gregorian) That someone would choose a human over a dog just illistrates the problem. That would be like saying in the 1800's "Would you choose two blacks to be tortured and killed or one white?" Does that somehow make it right that a majority of people would have chosen the white person? NO YOU F*CKING RETARD! USE YOUR BRAIN!

[TheGregorian]

Your analogy is irrelevent because you are talking about only humans, there's no animals in your analogy. So, it just doesn't relate.

[mikecooke]

i guess so! we are one of the 5 primates in this world

[vinniebaby1]

Why not post proof of the so called animal abductions? People are not the same as your pet dog or cat, contrary to what you believe. This is the confusion of the animal rights crowd. And how can you even begin to compare the holocaust victims to dogs? What a disgraceful comparison, again, a confused bunch of wack jobs you are. I think not finding cures by using animal research would have been cruel to the millions of people who would have had to suffer.

[TheGregorian]

I totally agree with you.

[mikecooke]

what the hell your just a neophyte

[FlakkMonkey]

History in the making? Really? Is that what you think?

Oh dear.

[Nayr747]

Yeah, it is. I'm sure there was some idiot just like you during the Civil Rights Movement. *Sigh* So sad.

[freckledpandette]

go SHAC!!

[veego82]

shac scumbags? what the fuck are you on about???

[Ligar250]

SHAC= Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty

they're devoted to closing down Huntington Life Sciences which allows it's employees to hurt animals ruitinely.