at Desteni we make a stand in oneness and equality - that is similar to indifference from the perspective that self investigates and becomes master of the inner 'mind-control' of habitual thoughts/beliefs and emotions/feelings; but not similar at all when it comes to the realization of responsibility for, commitment to and interest in ALL/LIFE as self realizes self in the context of life/the whole.
the other point is the point of accepting 'the ways of the world' which clearly are unacceptable.
as a study or consideration as having a look at this 'philosophy' or 'approach' - fine - but if one is to seriously go into this for whatever reason, I'd say consider the implications of such "attitude" and whether it allows at all for an individual to do what is best for all in spite of the current morality of the world - so as in fact to start changing the system through changing self. but within a mind-set of "grateful indifference" there is no room for any motive for change or (r)evolution.
"be gratefully indifferent" - because you are a slave.
you are a slave, therefore there is nothing better you can do but "be gratefully indifferent".
thus you will not question why, how come you are a slave. you are gratefully indifferent.
you will not question why, how come others are slaves. you are gratefully indifferent. is that the 'highest virtue' within the system perhaps? "the order of things"?
seems to me this approach/tactic aims at taking as little responsibility as possible through the acceptance of "these are the things I can't change" - running the danger of self-limitation and an un-visionary approach to life that acknowledge how it is the systems of this world that we submit to if we go into indifference or are not clear about the context of gratefulness -whether it's real based on actual movement of/as self, or 'patting oneself on the shoulder' thinking "I am doing my best".
The topic of Stoicism came up in a college course I was taking last year. Our professor seemed skeptical of Stoicism after considering the point of view of the soldier with PTSD. For that soldier, a Stoic mindset got him or her through battle, but if he or she continues thinking that way, their trauma could stay repressed. I think he agrees with the broad strokes of Stoicism in regards to petty things, but he understands that emotional damage must be acknowledged and dealt with properly.
As a "secular" stoic (kinda redundant I suppose, but I like to make this emphasis) I must say this: More I read, more I understand that the best and healthier way to embrace life greatest philosophical issues is by a rational and stoic point of view. Currently, I am reading "Meditations" of Marcus Aurellius. A good book to understand how stoicism is about, don't you think?
The irony of this is we would all be a lot healthier if we accepted things as they are with a sense of realism and not worrying about stuff we have no control over is a real killer. I like it...grateful indifference. Hard to learn to do thought. LOL
thanks for this. i'm having a hard time at the moment and things just get worse. i need to remain grateful for what i have and indifferent to that which i can no longer or could never change
sounds more like DECENT INDIFFERENCE. But grateful indifference is probably better. you life you laugh you cry you die, all men are mortal. Ecclesiates could have learned a thing or two from the stoics. Ya think?
i found your channel today through The Amazing Atheist, and from the 3 videos i've seen of yours, your content is much more thought provoking and less predictable and of higher quality than everything i've seen of TJ's
Behold, a fuckin communications professor doing what they do best. Ha, ha. My opinion...Absolutely nothing. It should actually disturb the productive in the world that they must feed the non-productive.
To my understanding, stoicism is not utter passivity. It's to understand what is in your control and what is not, and then taking the responsibility to act realistically and virtuously on what is. "Think globally, act locally."
However in our complex modern world, there are many things in our lives that we have at least partial control of. For example, if you invest in stocks and bonds you're partially in control of your finances. We live in a democratic society, so the policies made by our governments are partially in our control. I also like to argue that you have partial control of how people see you and think about you. So its difficult to find what aspects of our lives are unalterable.
Diogenes of Sinope ( the Cynic ) is credited with the first known use of the word "cosmopolitan". When he was asked where he came from, he replied, "I am a citizen of the world (cosmopolites)"
-- Laertius, Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, Book VI
Anyway, Stoicim can be considered a branch of Cynism ;)
@Professoranton Me again : ) I have have been studying stoicism recently and I have so far found there philosophy very useful and I love reading Markus Aurelius, Epictetus, Cicero and Senica. Anyway I was hoping to discus your book ''sources of significance'' via Skype sometime? if so feel free to add openairatheist on Skype.
This philosophy seems to passive and stagnate to me. Where there's a will there's a way. If everyone just sat and accepted what they thought they couldn't change then humanity would never evolve.
I disagree on your end statement that Epictetus is the place to start. If you're new to Stoic philosophy you should most definitely read Marcus Aurelius' meditations first. It is much easier to get through and understand (and shorter). The language, at least in the translation I have, is much more straightforward in the Meditations than in The Discourses. I also think that Marcus Aurelius, being a rich man of his time, has much more in common with average Americans/Brits today than Epictetus has
"GRATEFUL INDIFFERENCE": Your concept of the Indifference which is Grateful pretty much reminds me of Nietzsche's "amor fati" that he talked about in a great passage of the Gay Science, although I think he repudiated both the Stoics and the Epicureans on many accounts
Very good analysis of stoicism. I read Marcus Aurelius Meditations when I was a teenager,, and although I don't consider myself a stoic the principle of "grateful indifference" is priceless in the world today.
Incredible vid. You definitely don't get enough views in contrast to the quality of your videos. Subscribed, looking forward to more videos from you.
As someone who studies physics and the natural law of the universe, I'd like to aspire to be a stoic one day. This is among my favorite and most respected of Greek philosophies and I find that many aspects of it still hold true today. I think that the world would be a far better place with more stoics.
I would call myself perhaps a Neo-stoic. I don't agree with some of the stoic notions of Emotion but I find the stoic cosmology useful and refreshing. Stoicism is a robust tonic that I appreciate.
Okay so I myself believe in a personal God (unlike stoics) but I still like the indifference that comes through stoicism, the indifference to things that will lead to destructive emotions. I was just wondering if you can combine those. So you are a pantheist?
Great video - this is much easier said than done. Grateful indifference is an ideal that one can try to live up to, but under intense sorrow it can be very difficult to remain indifferent.
Nice work. I'm more familiar with Marcus Aurelius than w/ Epictetus. I remember researching the Stoics for a rhetoric paper in college, and falling in love with their worldview. It was one of the few outlooks that didn't clash with my atheism. It seemed entirely practical, a perfect balance of the analytical and the spiritual.
I aspire to be a stoic, but I have a tendency to tilt at windmills. We are none of us perfect - which is in of itself another thing to be stoic about.
I am grateful to you (but not indifferent, :)) that you reminded me of a notion I had, although I didn't call it stoic nor indifference: I have done everything in my power to procure good results in various fields in my life, but although in many of them the results were astounding, there are areas where you see failure. I don't fret about that, because I say to myself: - "I have done my best" and believe it or not, I am indifferent, but grateful for the good things that I do have.
i `ve found your approach a bit sneaky from nature of your specialisation, as there assumably one might think that there shouldn`t be 2 opinions on it, but interrestingly enough it serves certain ppl (me incl.) and i hope it reaches some minds to settle`em.
i have a question about the indus language though, may i ask how far there is something established to look for?
"if you look at culture" you cant see culture.
suddenuprising 2 weeks ago
at Desteni we make a stand in oneness and equality - that is similar to indifference from the perspective that self investigates and becomes master of the inner 'mind-control' of habitual thoughts/beliefs and emotions/feelings; but not similar at all when it comes to the realization of responsibility for, commitment to and interest in ALL/LIFE as self realizes self in the context of life/the whole.
the other point is the point of accepting 'the ways of the world' which clearly are unacceptable.
BellaBargilly 2 weeks ago
as a study or consideration as having a look at this 'philosophy' or 'approach' - fine - but if one is to seriously go into this for whatever reason, I'd say consider the implications of such "attitude" and whether it allows at all for an individual to do what is best for all in spite of the current morality of the world - so as in fact to start changing the system through changing self. but within a mind-set of "grateful indifference" there is no room for any motive for change or (r)evolution.
BellaBargilly 2 weeks ago
"be gratefully indifferent" - because you are a slave.
you are a slave, therefore there is nothing better you can do but "be gratefully indifferent".
thus you will not question why, how come you are a slave. you are gratefully indifferent.
you will not question why, how come others are slaves. you are gratefully indifferent. is that the 'highest virtue' within the system perhaps? "the order of things"?
BellaBargilly 2 weeks ago
seems to me this approach/tactic aims at taking as little responsibility as possible through the acceptance of "these are the things I can't change" - running the danger of self-limitation and an un-visionary approach to life that acknowledge how it is the systems of this world that we submit to if we go into indifference or are not clear about the context of gratefulness -whether it's real based on actual movement of/as self, or 'patting oneself on the shoulder' thinking "I am doing my best".
BellaBargilly 2 weeks ago
The topic of Stoicism came up in a college course I was taking last year. Our professor seemed skeptical of Stoicism after considering the point of view of the soldier with PTSD. For that soldier, a Stoic mindset got him or her through battle, but if he or she continues thinking that way, their trauma could stay repressed. I think he agrees with the broad strokes of Stoicism in regards to petty things, but he understands that emotional damage must be acknowledged and dealt with properly.
BJ219 1 month ago
As a "secular" stoic (kinda redundant I suppose, but I like to make this emphasis) I must say this: More I read, more I understand that the best and healthier way to embrace life greatest philosophical issues is by a rational and stoic point of view. Currently, I am reading "Meditations" of Marcus Aurellius. A good book to understand how stoicism is about, don't you think?
PetrusLucretius 2 months ago
Do you think there's an overlap between the beliefs of stoicism and buddhism?
TheForwardGaze 3 months ago
The tone is pitch perfect. Continue, please.
ReedYeats 5 months ago
I love your stoic videos. I hope you make more of them in the future. They are a big help.
Sonicthehedgehog73 6 months ago
How do you think stoicism compares to modern atheism, if at all?
Phavonic 6 months ago
This makes complete sense. Black people should have just accepted that slavery was not under their control....
Yanirakarola 7 months ago
@Yanirakarola
Is that all you got from this video?
TheKenTerry 7 months ago in playlist Stoicism & Ancient Philosophy
i thought plato was open to women learning and joining the symposium (The Laws)
sexdrugsRnR 7 months ago
Stoicism leads to Anarchism. It did for ancient Greeks, and it did for me!
RVqueen 8 months ago
The irony of this is we would all be a lot healthier if we accepted things as they are with a sense of realism and not worrying about stuff we have no control over is a real killer. I like it...grateful indifference. Hard to learn to do thought. LOL
MistiqueNoir 8 months ago
How is grateful indifference related to buddhist non-attatchment?
1adadada 8 months ago
what an amazing vid- subbed.
1adadada 8 months ago
This sounds like Lao Tzu; "do your work, then step back"
Ozrielos 8 months ago
Marco Pierre White ?!
sangsomlipo 9 months ago
Awesome video. Society would be a better place with more people at your level.
jonvssocrates 9 months ago
Grateful Indifference is neither here nor there.
batfly 9 months ago
Stoics were the shizzzzznit back in the day.. Those cats had the lowdown.
avq5 9 months ago
thanks for this. i'm having a hard time at the moment and things just get worse. i need to remain grateful for what i have and indifferent to that which i can no longer or could never change
jigglypuffgirl 10 months ago
Serious question Prof.:
Why is it important to do "the right thing"?
ezemdi 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ecclisiastes could have learned from the stoics!!!!!
rgaleny 10 months ago
Ecclisiates could have learned from the stoics.
rgaleny 10 months ago
sounds more like DECENT INDIFFERENCE. But grateful indifference is probably better. you life you laugh you cry you die, all men are mortal. Ecclesiates could have learned a thing or two from the stoics. Ya think?
rgaleny 10 months ago
sounds more like DECENT INDIFFERENCE.
rgaleny 10 months ago
Stoicism is the art of the peaceful,and grateful warrior.
megaralee 11 months ago
i found your channel today through The Amazing Atheist, and from the 3 videos i've seen of yours, your content is much more thought provoking and less predictable and of higher quality than everything i've seen of TJ's
xVictimOfADownx1 11 months ago
Mate, if you're ever in the UK, guve us a shout i'll get you a beer in and we can talk Stoicism.
TristanDesnos 11 months ago
how do these teachings correspond to Buddhism?
I sense that they do somehow
billygundum 1 year ago
Behold, a fuckin communications professor doing what they do best. Ha, ha. My opinion...Absolutely nothing. It should actually disturb the productive in the world that they must feed the non-productive.
yanikv 1 year ago
Comment removed
MoribundSoul1 1 year ago
Comment removed
MoribundSoul1 1 year ago
Comment removed
MoribundSoul1 1 year ago
To my understanding, stoicism is not utter passivity. It's to understand what is in your control and what is not, and then taking the responsibility to act realistically and virtuously on what is. "Think globally, act locally."
meinevvelten 1 year ago
Why not fight back?
MetaCraken 1 year ago
You make some good points
However in our complex modern world, there are many things in our lives that we have at least partial control of. For example, if you invest in stocks and bonds you're partially in control of your finances. We live in a democratic society, so the policies made by our governments are partially in our control. I also like to argue that you have partial control of how people see you and think about you. So its difficult to find what aspects of our lives are unalterable.
ABCshake 1 year ago
6:06 CORRECTION:
Diogenes of Sinope ( the Cynic ) is credited with the first known use of the word "cosmopolitan". When he was asked where he came from, he replied, "I am a citizen of the world (cosmopolites)"
-- Laertius, Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, Book VI
Anyway, Stoicim can be considered a branch of Cynism ;)
German1184 1 year ago
@German1184 Many thanks!
Professoranton 1 year ago
@Professoranton I have been reading Marcus Aurelius, his Meditations, fantastic book and and I really like this video Professor sir.
Metalheadtill1die 4 months ago
@Professoranton Me again : ) I have have been studying stoicism recently and I have so far found there philosophy very useful and I love reading Markus Aurelius, Epictetus, Cicero and Senica. Anyway I was hoping to discus your book ''sources of significance'' via Skype sometime? if so feel free to add openairatheist on Skype.
OpenAirAtheist 1 month ago
This philosophy seems to passive and stagnate to me. Where there's a will there's a way. If everyone just sat and accepted what they thought they couldn't change then humanity would never evolve.
CamillaCalamity 1 year ago
Thank you for this video!
miguelbinha 1 year ago
I disagree on your end statement that Epictetus is the place to start. If you're new to Stoic philosophy you should most definitely read Marcus Aurelius' meditations first. It is much easier to get through and understand (and shorter). The language, at least in the translation I have, is much more straightforward in the Meditations than in The Discourses. I also think that Marcus Aurelius, being a rich man of his time, has much more in common with average Americans/Brits today than Epictetus has
manmythlegend12 1 year ago
amazing. thankyou so much. well thought and clearly explained.
thedemoninmybrain 1 year ago
You are a marvelously insightful man. Thank you.
FishAlaska69 1 year ago
Very nice vid. Thanks.
timeofwonder2009 1 year ago
"GRATEFUL INDIFFERENCE": Your concept of the Indifference which is Grateful pretty much reminds me of Nietzsche's "amor fati" that he talked about in a great passage of the Gay Science, although I think he repudiated both the Stoics and the Epicureans on many accounts
eDionysus 1 year ago
Is there an excellent public domain Epictetus audio book I could snag somewhere?
thruthem 1 year ago
scribd (dot) com / nb812
DreamsofMajesty 1 year ago
Thank you professor Anton! I have been interested in Stoic philosophy and your videos are of great help!
andreleitecoelho 1 year ago
Very good analysis of stoicism. I read Marcus Aurelius Meditations when I was a teenager,, and although I don't consider myself a stoic the principle of "grateful indifference" is priceless in the world today.
Aestros909 1 year ago
loved the vid !
stanislavvon 1 year ago
I agree. You should get more views. Thanks for posting.
pepperrgirl 1 year ago
thanks for this
IIIMPULSE 1 year ago
God, grant me the serenity
To accept the things I cannot change;
Courage to change the things I can;
And wisdom to know the difference.
rumit99 1 year ago
I never even read the stoics, but a professor I really admired at university said I was a stoic.
EasyESL 1 year ago
Professor Anton: I have to admit that I hated you before, but I really, really like this video.
EasyESL 1 year ago
I have a lot of "stoic" qualities that I hate but I can't get rid of.
EasyESL 1 year ago
This is a good video.
EasyESL 1 year ago
5:08:
The scientists and industrialists are more of an exemplar here.
Professoranton, I think you're stuck in the mind body dichotomy, you really need to read Ayn Rand.
PortfolioManager1987 1 year ago
Incredible vid. You definitely don't get enough views in contrast to the quality of your videos. Subscribed, looking forward to more videos from you.
As someone who studies physics and the natural law of the universe, I'd like to aspire to be a stoic one day. This is among my favorite and most respected of Greek philosophies and I find that many aspects of it still hold true today. I think that the world would be a far better place with more stoics.
GiantDoucheNG 2 years ago 7
Thank you for your kind comments.
Professoranton 2 years ago
If I may ask, are you a stoic?
pcnation11 2 years ago
I would call myself perhaps a Neo-stoic. I don't agree with some of the stoic notions of Emotion but I find the stoic cosmology useful and refreshing. Stoicism is a robust tonic that I appreciate.
Professoranton 2 years ago 3
Okay so I myself believe in a personal God (unlike stoics) but I still like the indifference that comes through stoicism, the indifference to things that will lead to destructive emotions. I was just wondering if you can combine those. So you are a pantheist?
pcnation11 2 years ago
Another great vid.
Cimbolic 2 years ago
Thank you so much. All best to you
Professoranton 2 years ago
Useful information - something I needed to hear today :-)
Many thanks.
In the midst of emotional turmoil, yes, it becomes difficult to rise to the ideal, but one has to try.
beardfreak1969 2 years ago
Thanks, Check out the other vids in the Reading Group.
Professoranton 2 years ago
Great video - this is much easier said than done. Grateful indifference is an ideal that one can try to live up to, but under intense sorrow it can be very difficult to remain indifferent.
baller1069 2 years ago
Agreed. Thanks
Professoranton 2 years ago
Nice work. I'm more familiar with Marcus Aurelius than w/ Epictetus. I remember researching the Stoics for a rhetoric paper in college, and falling in love with their worldview. It was one of the few outlooks that didn't clash with my atheism. It seemed entirely practical, a perfect balance of the analytical and the spiritual.
I aspire to be a stoic, but I have a tendency to tilt at windmills. We are none of us perfect - which is in of itself another thing to be stoic about.
FeelFreeToArgue 2 years ago
@FeelFreeToArgue well said amigo
JustAintthatWay 1 year ago
I am grateful to you (but not indifferent, :)) that you reminded me of a notion I had, although I didn't call it stoic nor indifference: I have done everything in my power to procure good results in various fields in my life, but although in many of them the results were astounding, there are areas where you see failure. I don't fret about that, because I say to myself: - "I have done my best" and believe it or not, I am indifferent, but grateful for the good things that I do have.
dewonthegrass 2 years ago
beautifully said
Professoranton 2 years ago
Comment removed
JustAintthatWay 1 year ago
Great video. I posted on newsishDOTcom.
Newsish 2 years ago
Today is full of people unwilling to take responsibility for there lifes. We need a revival of this.
dwixi 2 years ago
you remind me so so much of a good friend of mine, even the way you talk! its craaaaazy///
clearshquarter 2 years ago
i `ve found your approach a bit sneaky from nature of your specialisation, as there assumably one might think that there shouldn`t be 2 opinions on it, but interrestingly enough it serves certain ppl (me incl.) and i hope it reaches some minds to settle`em.
i have a question about the indus language though, may i ask how far there is something established to look for?
Realizalize 2 years ago