Its not as deep as SF3 but then thats kind of the point - it's more accessable. The FOCUS attack is a PARRY 'lite' to add depth to the old SF2 style of play (you CAN mix it up in combos). These kids don't know shit (no offense) - MK VS DC is NOT a Capcom game. Of the 3D styling and 2D play - how did the move to 3D go for King Of Fighters, the nearest thing to Street Fighter? It was shit, obviously - how was Street Fighter EX (3D)? It was shit.. There you go; Street Fighter does not work in 3D!
I think my biggest beef with SF4 (witch i gave a 3/5 witch is a good score) is that it feels pritty much the same as the original SF witch is 20 years old. . . So it feels a little aged right out of the box. . . . but there are people who like SF no mater what and those that just dont like it. . .so thats that.
Yea. Even the best street fighter players in world said that SFIV isn't that good. They each said that if you want a game to play competetively, you should play either Street Fighter 3 Third Strike, Capcom vs Snk 2, Street Fighter Alpha 3, and Marvel Vs Capcom 2. I have all of them and they are better than Street Fighter IV. Also Street Fighter EX Plus Alpha is the best in the EX Series. You should check it out.
Well, I definitly love sf3 way more than sf4 but the gae isnt that bad, ok aybe the 2d move with 3d graphics arent the best choice, but if we only focus on how the visuals look, they are completely beautiful compared to other games....
i think what we are seeing here is a game that casual gamers like and hardcore gamers (such as your self) don't.
I, a Suikoden 2 fan found this game to be a ship load of fun. arts great, controls are good, characters...still don't care about any of them but overall i would have given it a 4 out of 5.
I still find it funny people are either too stubborn or too dumb to realize you based the review on a first impression which you CLEARLY stated towards the end. Good review nonetheless.. I do admit though, some of the points your colleagues brought up were pretty irrelevant but seeing the game in action myself I found it sort of like MKvs.DC, mixing the old with the new, at least in my eyes.
yeah. I think most of the hate on this video came from people who stoped watching half way though because *gasp* we had an opinion that was diferent then there own. OH no. ha ha. . But yes, i agree with you its a mix of old an new.
Just so you know, because it seems you don't, people (at least the intelligent ones) aren't criticizing you for saying the game was bad. There are bad and disappointing games out there, clearly. You're catching shit because your REVIEW is so off base. Your own gameplay footage shows that neither of them are any good or even try to be, which probably wouldn't be bad for a casual review, but then to say "it's below us hardcore gamers" or whatever? Come on man, we watched them play it.
Now, part of the quality of a game is the appeal to a wide variety of skills, but to tell us if a game is worse or dumbed down, at least be able to use what the game has to offer with some glimmer of competency.
Also, which the exception of subjective things like music, every single one of their criticisms stemmed from their own lack of knowledge. Not 3D? No parry? Judge a game based on its faults, not your dumb friends who saw new art and expected Tekken when we all knew better months ago.
No, what I'm saying is that if you're going to criticize game mechanics and systems or use them as grounds to bash the game, you should understand and be able to use them.
Otherwise, it's like posting a review saying that automatic cars are worse than standard when you can't drive stick.
What I think you're not understanding is that it's a first impression review, it's like playing a game for the first time and telling your buddies how it went and you'd probably say it in the same way Mike did: "I haven't played x game enough to really go in-depth, but based on my first couple playthroughs I will say x" that's defending Mike, but as I said in my other comment his buddies did give some irrelevant points such as basing sound solely on the voice acting.
Or graphics solely on a 2D vs. 3D argument rather than how the characters interact, how fluidly they move, etc. Mike's review at the end was objective he based it on his first impression. What I think people are giving him shit for is from his buddies bias towards other points (example the 2D vs. 3D argument)
Well, not only am I a MK fan, but I love Street Fighter as well. Yeah, MK changed over the years with different gameplay styles and such, But SF is good the way it is and should not change all that much.
Heres the problem with this review, 3rd strike is VASTLY different from SF4 and your basically having him state how its different from 3s. as for the MvC fan, that is like a team based fighter, which once again is a completely different breed. Find a fan of SF2 and have him review the game and see how he likes it. I mean shit, I am a huge Guilty Gear Fan, which is even more different from the entire capcom line and it was still one of my favorite fighting games
and does it make any more sense for people who are biased against it? or why not try someone who games quite a bit but not fighting games? I'm saying that your two esteemed colleges arent a good source of review due to bias sense they are just comparing to games that are not of the same style. Where as SF4 is a fantastic new installment for the SF2 liniage
Its not like we all went into the game think it was going to suck. We were all VERY exsited to play. . . WHy is it suck a bad thing to think the game is Bad, why does it matter. . . Why is it so hard to beleive that they genuenly did not like the game for what it was.
But what ever, its a non issue, its just a game, and these two were the only people on the net with the balls to say the game was not all that great.
Well, its kind of sad. Mortal Kombat fans are Angry, that the new game is so different from former games and Street Fighter-fans don´t like, that part 4 is in too many cases like part 2. I guess somebody will always complain.
ha ha ha. thats a great point. very funny. Well i for one always love a game to improve on its self. Thats why i like MK so much. Compare MK1 to MK:DA and you have vastly diferent games and i like that.
I wish they would have pushed SF4 futher. SF is knon to be the king of Compation fighting games, and then they go and soffen up with 4. . .
Well, I haven´t Played MKvsDC or SF4 yet, so I can´t say, if one of them is bad or not, but that brings me to the question: why aren´t there any demos out?!
But what i was trying to say is, that I think, you got two SF-fans, that are a little nostalgic about 3rd strike and thats the main reason, why THEY diddn´t like sf4.
well, still like the show and hope to see more soon. cya ^^
I think you did a good job on the review...now mind you I disagree with you alot, but I totally see how your point. I personally love Street Fighter IV, but I totally see how one would prefer third strike over it, and respect that. I prefer SFIV better then third strike, but thats just mine, and I respect yours...your review was good none the less!
See, now that is awesome. I dig you dude! you totaly disagree with me, but you were totaly cool about it. . .I i could give your commet 5 stars i would. . .oh wait. . would you look at that. .. ok Thumbs up then. . . Bam!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Yes I have rent it and I was bored after 1 hour. Nothing new. It's a street fighter 2 remake. Also you cannot move in 3d like in mk vs dc and you always have to jump or duck if you want not to be hit by a projectile. I feel like I am a prisoner when I play this game. My score? 7/10. A rent yes. A buy ? No way.
A remake of SF2? Hardly. The only things that resemble it are the fact you can't block in air and the cast. Besides that it plays nothing similar. Dashing, Back Dashing, EX moves, different physics, much more advanced juggling, focusing, focus cancels, focus canceling specials, how throws are handled, Ultras, how supers are handled, quick recovery. The list goes on. It takes and builds on more of the later mechanics of the series.
Also, it was never advertised as being a 3d fighter. Since the very first gameplay details were released, it was known this would be a 2d based fighter. And ducking and jumping are not what you always have to do to avoid projectiles. You can trade with other projectiles. You can use focus to autoguard the first hit. You can EX many moves to autoguard through projectiles. And you still have the mass amounts of moves that go through projectiles (Balrog's headbutt, Zangief's Lariat, etc.).
Next you should make a video where the game is reviewed by people who a) know anything about fighting games and can play them at least a little competently, b) are aware that SFIV is not a 3D fighter and has never claimed to be, c) can figure out that the reason it doesn't play like SFIII is because it's not (they even changed the number to help out the slower folks) and d) can find criticism other than "it's just like the old one," especially after whining that it's not like the old one. Cheers
the fan boys will give it a bad rating because they think im wrong. The video its self is not half bad. But the fan boys can still comment all they want.
I did not try the genisis. . .i better do that now. . . . .nope, did not work. how sad
I can't help but feel pissed at those idiots who reviewed the game. *I* think sf IV is 100X better than SF III:3rd strike (especially music wise!) and marvel vs capcom 2 (horrid music and lousy combo system). Obviously those idiots you have review this never heard of a "fan base". "It sucks" such smarts there! I give Sf:IV a 4.5/5 due to giving the fans what they crave with a newer look! Long Live Street Fighter....,HA-DO-KEN.
3rd Strike was pure crap!!!!!! Stupid uninspired characters and stupid music. I like good music in fighting games and SF III 3rd strike fails. Might as well call the shitty game SFIII : Parry strike. WOW a game where I can parry all day. I'll play a good character like Fei Long and Ryu. Why don't you play STUPID characters like "Dudely", "Urien" and "Oro" Terrible,Terrible characters SF IV>SF: III parry strike hands down. Classic SF action just the way a FAN likes it.
Valid criticism makes me a fan boy? I can't help it if you made a bogus review where your "real gamers" clearly have no idea what's going on. Idiots who claim to like Street Fighter aren't any more valid than idiots who don't. If they play 3S anything like they played in this video (horribly, for those who can't tell,) I'm fairly justified in my above comment. If that makes me a fan boy, then the vast majority of gamers with working eye sight and a shred of knowledge are as well.
No, I don't suck at SF 3, I used to enjoy the game for about 7 months and then put it away. SF III isn't for everyone. I used to be best With Ken and Chun-Li with local tournaments we had around here at the arcade that used to have the game. Then the Dreamcast version game out and it was a fun 7 months. I don't suck at SF III, I just can't stand the game and the music is TERRIBLE. SF IV puts what I REALLY MISS about *Street Fighter* and adds it back into the game play. SF III SUCKS!!!!!
It's like you said in the SFII review, it's expected in culture. People look down upon d-pads for arcade games, similar to how people look down on keyboard use for netplay games (yet I did play MK against you that time with a keyboard, Mike and we still had fun lol). I haven't really cared much for Street Fighter IV though. Hopefully... no more rehashed revisions.
Truth? Sure, complaining about painfully obvious things is true, but when a game doesn't meet your expectations because you expected things are well known to be untrue, that's sad.
*"Boohoo, it's not 3D!"-No kidding
*"It's not like the old games!"-No kidding
*"Parries don't work!"-No kidding
*"The controls are the same!"-Surprise?
*"It's boring and plays just like the old games!"-Wait...what? But you just said...
Combine this with their obvious ineptitude, and it really hurts credibility.
no your a fanboy because you felt it was so important to tell us we were wrong. If you were not a fan boy you would have said "Fags" and went to another video. I asume you found my video by looking for SF on youtube. So that meens you were searching SF reviews when you already know what you think of the game. . That is what makes you a Fanboy
Close: I found this video by following a link where you asked people to watch your video. I'm not saying you're wrong, because your buddies pointed out some things that are painfully obviously true. I haven't even played the game myself, it's just amusing that you go out of your way to call out "fanboys" simply because they disagree with you, while simultaneously ignoring all valid criticism of your "review." It's too bad you drove two hours to get the opinions of people who are so clueless.
Well i was not all that impressed with the game. (however i did not play it enugh for a real opinion. but it made a bad first impression) But, no i dont ignore valid points. I just figure if you feel compled to tell us we are wrong. then you must have a persinal stake in the game some how. Thats what i call a fanboy and thats who i call out. thats all.
If you own the system, then you should be use to the controller. When ever someone bitches about the D-pad on the 360 and they own one, it just seems silly to me. If you own it, and play it, you should be use to it. It takes like 10 minutes to feel comfortable.
Like I said on GFAQS. Trust your own choice in games, not your friends. If I trusted by friend to review Halo 3 he would look like an asshole and make me look like an asshole by association.
Korudo I agree with you as well and i'm Uriah on the video. It is a good game in it's new direction towards casual gamer, but is leaving the more competitive Hardcore gamer in the dust. it just doesn't suite me and for most who have played third strike prior to this release I think are as let down as i was. Good argument on your part.
Wow, so you're really good at Third Strike? Awesome. We should play sometime. I've been looking for someone to teach me the ins and outs of that game. Hit me up with a PM.
This is not an oficial Arcade Guts review. I have never played SF4 in the arcades. Also i dont consider this My review but rather Uriah and Blain's Review, i just put the thing together.
Street fighter 3 is great but the characters are weird as fuck street fighter 4 has all the classic characters we all know
jlong908 1 year ago
Comment removed
KnightoftheColossus 1 year ago
and great review BTW.
Artayes 2 years ago
Street Fighter IV is just horrible. SF Third Strike all the way!
Artayes 2 years ago
Its not as deep as SF3 but then thats kind of the point - it's more accessable. The FOCUS attack is a PARRY 'lite' to add depth to the old SF2 style of play (you CAN mix it up in combos). These kids don't know shit (no offense) - MK VS DC is NOT a Capcom game. Of the 3D styling and 2D play - how did the move to 3D go for King Of Fighters, the nearest thing to Street Fighter? It was shit, obviously - how was Street Fighter EX (3D)? It was shit.. There you go; Street Fighter does not work in 3D!
andy7666 2 years ago
I think my biggest beef with SF4 (witch i gave a 3/5 witch is a good score) is that it feels pritty much the same as the original SF witch is 20 years old. . . So it feels a little aged right out of the box. . . . but there are people who like SF no mater what and those that just dont like it. . .so thats that.
Aeris999acl 2 years ago
Yea. Even the best street fighter players in world said that SFIV isn't that good. They each said that if you want a game to play competetively, you should play either Street Fighter 3 Third Strike, Capcom vs Snk 2, Street Fighter Alpha 3, and Marvel Vs Capcom 2. I have all of them and they are better than Street Fighter IV. Also Street Fighter EX Plus Alpha is the best in the EX Series. You should check it out.
branflakes11 2 years ago
Awesome man
doug8798 2 years ago
End = true
mrbrownjeremy 2 years ago
I dont play it yet but it looks really good just Like Street Fighter 2
coolninjatvprod 2 years ago
@coolninjatvprod
this a was a year ago and you still haven't played it!
vision821821 1 year ago
Well, I definitly love sf3 way more than sf4 but the gae isnt that bad, ok aybe the 2d move with 3d graphics arent the best choice, but if we only focus on how the visuals look, they are completely beautiful compared to other games....
ajesed 2 years ago
fail
ps3 version is superior..
suiton629 2 years ago
i really like street fighter iv and think its way better than mortal kombat vs dc but ive always been a fan of fighting games
malc1976 2 years ago
MK vs DCU is more of a casual game. People who play MK for Compition (seriously) are missing the point.
Respect
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
i think what we are seeing here is a game that casual gamers like and hardcore gamers (such as your self) don't.
I, a Suikoden 2 fan found this game to be a ship load of fun. arts great, controls are good, characters...still don't care about any of them but overall i would have given it a 4 out of 5.
Much Respect
ggcpres 2 years ago
Ok the game is very good. I just wish that they made a completely new roster like in Street Fighter 3. I like Street Fighter 3 more.
branflakes11 2 years ago
SF3 rocks socks! Its Da-Bomb
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
xbox sucks ass, what you want is a playstation 3.
ReddDevils619 2 years ago
The game isnt that bad. The game was pretty dissapointing. But it dosent matter causes TEKKEN 6 is gona be WAY BETTER.
branflakes11 2 years ago
I prefer SF3 at least you can parry. SF4 is weird by my tastes. MK vs. DC is better. :)
hoppers001 2 years ago
Agree
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
I still find it funny people are either too stubborn or too dumb to realize you based the review on a first impression which you CLEARLY stated towards the end. Good review nonetheless.. I do admit though, some of the points your colleagues brought up were pretty irrelevant but seeing the game in action myself I found it sort of like MKvs.DC, mixing the old with the new, at least in my eyes.
AmAxel35 2 years ago
yeah. I think most of the hate on this video came from people who stoped watching half way though because *gasp* we had an opinion that was diferent then there own. OH no. ha ha. . But yes, i agree with you its a mix of old an new.
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
Just so you know, because it seems you don't, people (at least the intelligent ones) aren't criticizing you for saying the game was bad. There are bad and disappointing games out there, clearly. You're catching shit because your REVIEW is so off base. Your own gameplay footage shows that neither of them are any good or even try to be, which probably wouldn't be bad for a casual review, but then to say "it's below us hardcore gamers" or whatever? Come on man, we watched them play it.
Franco629 2 years ago
Comment removed
Franco629 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Now, part of the quality of a game is the appeal to a wide variety of skills, but to tell us if a game is worse or dumbed down, at least be able to use what the game has to offer with some glimmer of competency.
Also, which the exception of subjective things like music, every single one of their criticisms stemmed from their own lack of knowledge. Not 3D? No parry? Judge a game based on its faults, not your dumb friends who saw new art and expected Tekken when we all knew better months ago.
Franco629 2 years ago
we never said its below "us hard core gamemrs" we just said we did not feel it was hard core.
It sounds like your saying you have to be good at a game in order to say it is good or bad.
I suck at Donkey Kong (arcade) however i think its one of the best games. Being bad at the game does not make the review off base.
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
No, what I'm saying is that if you're going to criticize game mechanics and systems or use them as grounds to bash the game, you should understand and be able to use them.
Otherwise, it's like posting a review saying that automatic cars are worse than standard when you can't drive stick.
Franco629 2 years ago
What I think you're not understanding is that it's a first impression review, it's like playing a game for the first time and telling your buddies how it went and you'd probably say it in the same way Mike did: "I haven't played x game enough to really go in-depth, but based on my first couple playthroughs I will say x" that's defending Mike, but as I said in my other comment his buddies did give some irrelevant points such as basing sound solely on the voice acting.
AmAxel35 2 years ago
Or graphics solely on a 2D vs. 3D argument rather than how the characters interact, how fluidly they move, etc. Mike's review at the end was objective he based it on his first impression. What I think people are giving him shit for is from his buddies bias towards other points (example the 2D vs. 3D argument)
AmAxel35 2 years ago
Well, not only am I a MK fan, but I love Street Fighter as well. Yeah, MK changed over the years with different gameplay styles and such, But SF is good the way it is and should not change all that much.
SPac316 2 years ago
Ha ha ha, "The test of a good game is if it works on the super nintendo...
Nope Street fighter sucks, bad game"
Hilarious!
hoshi50000 2 years ago
Heres the problem with this review, 3rd strike is VASTLY different from SF4 and your basically having him state how its different from 3s. as for the MvC fan, that is like a team based fighter, which once again is a completely different breed. Find a fan of SF2 and have him review the game and see how he likes it. I mean shit, I am a huge Guilty Gear Fan, which is even more different from the entire capcom line and it was still one of my favorite fighting games
AumaanRa 2 years ago
I dont get it. .. if they dont like the game. Then thats that. .
a SF2 fan would be the most bias scorce to review SF4. . .
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
and does it make any more sense for people who are biased against it? or why not try someone who games quite a bit but not fighting games? I'm saying that your two esteemed colleges arent a good source of review due to bias sense they are just comparing to games that are not of the same style. Where as SF4 is a fantastic new installment for the SF2 liniage
AumaanRa 2 years ago
Its not like we all went into the game think it was going to suck. We were all VERY exsited to play. . . WHy is it suck a bad thing to think the game is Bad, why does it matter. . . Why is it so hard to beleive that they genuenly did not like the game for what it was.
But what ever, its a non issue, its just a game, and these two were the only people on the net with the balls to say the game was not all that great.
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
Well, its kind of sad. Mortal Kombat fans are Angry, that the new game is so different from former games and Street Fighter-fans don´t like, that part 4 is in too many cases like part 2. I guess somebody will always complain.
Myndi84 2 years ago
ha ha ha. thats a great point. very funny. Well i for one always love a game to improve on its self. Thats why i like MK so much. Compare MK1 to MK:DA and you have vastly diferent games and i like that.
I wish they would have pushed SF4 futher. SF is knon to be the king of Compation fighting games, and then they go and soffen up with 4. . .
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
Yeah you said that in one of your reviews.
Well, I haven´t Played MKvsDC or SF4 yet, so I can´t say, if one of them is bad or not, but that brings me to the question: why aren´t there any demos out?!
But what i was trying to say is, that I think, you got two SF-fans, that are a little nostalgic about 3rd strike and thats the main reason, why THEY diddn´t like sf4.
well, still like the show and hope to see more soon. cya ^^
Myndi84 2 years ago
yeah, i could agree with that.
As for the show, i am working on a new Arcade Guts tight now :P I hope to finish it today or tomarow
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
Dude, seriously, that was terrible review, you guys only like the suck ass part of the game. anime.
RandomEarthCinema 2 years ago
ha ha ha . . . then between the four of us, we eather like every thing or nothing about the game. . .
It was just a first impression review (as it clearly states) and we all felt it did not live up to its predisesor. ..
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
I think you did a good job on the review...now mind you I disagree with you alot, but I totally see how your point. I personally love Street Fighter IV, but I totally see how one would prefer third strike over it, and respect that. I prefer SFIV better then third strike, but thats just mine, and I respect yours...your review was good none the less!
MagusX1 2 years ago
See, now that is awesome. I dig you dude! you totaly disagree with me, but you were totaly cool about it. . .I i could give your commet 5 stars i would. . .oh wait. . would you look at that. .. ok Thumbs up then. . . Bam!
Stay cool dude
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
No Problem at all dude! thanks man!
MagusX1 2 years ago
what the fuck is this fireball shit. play the game correctly then review it. idiots. 3rd strike and marvel player my ass
Hirayu 2 years ago 4
oh im sorry, i did not know there were laws on how to play the game. . . get off it fanboy
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
street fighter 4 looks awesome.
mario123dude 2 years ago 7
its realy not that great. Stick with Nintendo and play SmashBrothers.
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
fare enough
mario123dude 2 years ago
Aren't all MK games just clones as well?
risonqide 2 years ago 5
so are you saying MK3 plays just like MK: Deception. and that MK deception plays just like MK vs DCU?
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
Sup CAT? Wanna meet on Godweapon and play some more matches?
billykane32 2 years ago
not to many people call me by that name. But im very tired tonight. I will probly be playing some tomarow. Look for me then.
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yes I have rent it and I was bored after 1 hour. Nothing new. It's a street fighter 2 remake. Also you cannot move in 3d like in mk vs dc and you always have to jump or duck if you want not to be hit by a projectile. I feel like I am a prisoner when I play this game. My score? 7/10. A rent yes. A buy ? No way.
raptorakias 2 years ago
A remake of SF2? Hardly. The only things that resemble it are the fact you can't block in air and the cast. Besides that it plays nothing similar. Dashing, Back Dashing, EX moves, different physics, much more advanced juggling, focusing, focus cancels, focus canceling specials, how throws are handled, Ultras, how supers are handled, quick recovery. The list goes on. It takes and builds on more of the later mechanics of the series.
billykane32 2 years ago 15
Also, it was never advertised as being a 3d fighter. Since the very first gameplay details were released, it was known this would be a 2d based fighter. And ducking and jumping are not what you always have to do to avoid projectiles. You can trade with other projectiles. You can use focus to autoguard the first hit. You can EX many moves to autoguard through projectiles. And you still have the mass amounts of moves that go through projectiles (Balrog's headbutt, Zangief's Lariat, etc.).
billykane32 2 years ago 16
That kid with the glasses is a fag. No offense to you tho corn
illuminadi 2 years ago
these dude are horrible...get a new couch
fredlazr 2 years ago 11
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I will have you know that that couch is rather comfy.
and the game sucks. :D
HoldenWTFpwnt 2 years ago
haha i use to have one like that...this game is cheap sometimes i will agree on dat fasho but its still tight...how do u record in High Quality?
fredlazr 2 years ago
Next you should make a video where the game is reviewed by people who a) know anything about fighting games and can play them at least a little competently, b) are aware that SFIV is not a 3D fighter and has never claimed to be, c) can figure out that the reason it doesn't play like SFIII is because it's not (they even changed the number to help out the slower folks) and d) can find criticism other than "it's just like the old one," especially after whining that it's not like the old one. Cheers
Franco629 2 years ago 8
-_-
Subjugator1866 2 years ago 8
Deactivated rating? Afraid of some SF4-Fanboys? ^.°
Well, since it doesn´t work on the snes, i´ll get it a little later, when it´s cheaper. Did you check the megadrive? XD
Myndi84 2 years ago 12
the fan boys will give it a bad rating because they think im wrong. The video its self is not half bad. But the fan boys can still comment all they want.
I did not try the genisis. . .i better do that now. . . . .nope, did not work. how sad
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
Street fighter alpha 3 is my favorite SF.
blade1550 2 years ago
I liked streetfighter Alpha 3 and
Marvel vs. capcom 2 the most outta the SF games.
GokaishuSonOfGouki 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Great Review
Although some seem to disagree. I'm also happy to see you went out of your way to review the Street Fighter.
GameTurtle 2 years ago
I can't help but feel pissed at those idiots who reviewed the game. *I* think sf IV is 100X better than SF III:3rd strike (especially music wise!) and marvel vs capcom 2 (horrid music and lousy combo system). Obviously those idiots you have review this never heard of a "fan base". "It sucks" such smarts there! I give Sf:IV a 4.5/5 due to giving the fans what they crave with a newer look! Long Live Street Fighter....,HA-DO-KEN.
Numba1H8ter 2 years ago 5
Yeah becasue the music really matters because that is what the game was made for >.>
HA-DO-FUCK YOU :)
wiidangerous 2 years ago
3rd Strike was pure crap!!!!!! Stupid uninspired characters and stupid music. I like good music in fighting games and SF III 3rd strike fails. Might as well call the shitty game SFIII : Parry strike. WOW a game where I can parry all day. I'll play a good character like Fei Long and Ryu. Why don't you play STUPID characters like "Dudely", "Urien" and "Oro" Terrible,Terrible characters SF IV>SF: III parry strike hands down. Classic SF action just the way a FAN likes it.
Numba1H8ter 2 years ago
and a FAN is blind to the truth. No matter how bad a SF game is, a FAN will say its good because it has two words "Street Fighter"
We play will all the 3rd strike charicters, you must suck at SF3.
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
Using all the characters probably isn't enough to salvage how good (or not) you are if this video is any indication. You guys must suck at SF3.
Franco629 2 years ago 5
get off it fan boy.
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
Valid criticism makes me a fan boy? I can't help it if you made a bogus review where your "real gamers" clearly have no idea what's going on. Idiots who claim to like Street Fighter aren't any more valid than idiots who don't. If they play 3S anything like they played in this video (horribly, for those who can't tell,) I'm fairly justified in my above comment. If that makes me a fan boy, then the vast majority of gamers with working eye sight and a shred of knowledge are as well.
Franco629 2 years ago 4
No, I don't suck at SF 3, I used to enjoy the game for about 7 months and then put it away. SF III isn't for everyone. I used to be best With Ken and Chun-Li with local tournaments we had around here at the arcade that used to have the game. Then the Dreamcast version game out and it was a fun 7 months. I don't suck at SF III, I just can't stand the game and the music is TERRIBLE. SF IV puts what I REALLY MISS about *Street Fighter* and adds it back into the game play. SF III SUCKS!!!!!
Numba1H8ter 2 years ago
It's like you said in the SFII review, it's expected in culture. People look down upon d-pads for arcade games, similar to how people look down on keyboard use for netplay games (yet I did play MK against you that time with a keyboard, Mike and we still had fun lol). I haven't really cared much for Street Fighter IV though. Hopefully... no more rehashed revisions.
AmAxel35 2 years ago 2
i know what you meen. Just play the game right? but as for SF4, there is already talk about a SF4: Dash! Yeah, the revesions start! Here we go again.
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
Dear god... XD
AmAxel35 2 years ago
"real gamers" = a dumb and dumber reject and a guy in fagprint pj's?
I can't undestand why somone would take internet trolling into a real life hobby.
ilazul 2 years ago 8
you were just Tolling now, so why dont you understand?
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
truth isn't trolling, and LOL at having to disable ratings. SFIV already sold more than MK vs DC.
ilazul 2 years ago 10
when did this become a MK vs SF. This is more of a SF4 vs SF:third strike. We dont like 4 because its not as good (or better) then Third strike.
And if truth isn't trolling, then they are not trolling, there telling the truth.
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
For me SF:third strike is alright if you
don't count the uber gay lookin boss...
Gill
GokaishuSonOfGouki 2 years ago
Truth? Sure, complaining about painfully obvious things is true, but when a game doesn't meet your expectations because you expected things are well known to be untrue, that's sad.
*"Boohoo, it's not 3D!"-No kidding
*"It's not like the old games!"-No kidding
*"Parries don't work!"-No kidding
*"The controls are the same!"-Surprise?
*"It's boring and plays just like the old games!"-Wait...what? But you just said...
Combine this with their obvious ineptitude, and it really hurts credibility.
Franco629 2 years ago 5
no your a fanboy because you felt it was so important to tell us we were wrong. If you were not a fan boy you would have said "Fags" and went to another video. I asume you found my video by looking for SF on youtube. So that meens you were searching SF reviews when you already know what you think of the game. . That is what makes you a Fanboy
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
Close: I found this video by following a link where you asked people to watch your video. I'm not saying you're wrong, because your buddies pointed out some things that are painfully obviously true. I haven't even played the game myself, it's just amusing that you go out of your way to call out "fanboys" simply because they disagree with you, while simultaneously ignoring all valid criticism of your "review." It's too bad you drove two hours to get the opinions of people who are so clueless.
Franco629 2 years ago 2
Well i was not all that impressed with the game. (however i did not play it enugh for a real opinion. but it made a bad first impression) But, no i dont ignore valid points. I just figure if you feel compled to tell us we are wrong. then you must have a persinal stake in the game some how. Thats what i call a fanboy and thats who i call out. thats all.
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
how the fuck can you play on the 360 controller
T4nz4ni4232 2 years ago
If you own the system, then you should be use to the controller. When ever someone bitches about the D-pad on the 360 and they own one, it just seems silly to me. If you own it, and play it, you should be use to it. It takes like 10 minutes to feel comfortable.
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
dude its a fighting game....you cant you a fuckin controller
T4nz4ni4232 2 years ago 4
i do, i have no problem. whats it matter to you
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
you have a 360 but i have ps3
littlevince104 2 years ago
ps3 was a little to expensive for me :(
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
Like I said on GFAQS. Trust your own choice in games, not your friends. If I trusted by friend to review Halo 3 he would look like an asshole and make me look like an asshole by association.
BigAngryNerd 2 years ago
Those two guys are fucking retards.
LanyardB 2 years ago 8
I'm not a fan of how fireball spam is back again due to lack of parries.
HeyYoWL 2 years ago
1)A lot of the fireballs are piss poor slow
2)As long as it's not a multi hitting fireball, Focus will absorb it
3)You still have moves that go through fireballs (Balrog's Headbutt, Zangief's Lariat)
4)Many of the EX moves also have 1 hit autoguard on them
But, fireballs actually have some sort of purpose in this SF. You can still control space with them. Parries made fireballs completely useless.
billykane32 2 years ago
P.S. - I will admit that I'm not really fond of how the game is overall slower than Third Strike. That's my only real gripe.
Korudo 2 years ago 3
I'm a Third Strike player myself, but I really do like SFIV personally. I dunno. I guess I like the game for what it is, and not for what it lacks.
Korudo 2 years ago
thats a fair thing to say. Korudo, you rock :)
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
Korudo I agree with you as well and i'm Uriah on the video. It is a good game in it's new direction towards casual gamer, but is leaving the more competitive Hardcore gamer in the dust. it just doesn't suite me and for most who have played third strike prior to this release I think are as let down as i was. Good argument on your part.
wiidangerous 2 years ago
Wow, so you're really good at Third Strike? Awesome. We should play sometime. I've been looking for someone to teach me the ins and outs of that game. Hit me up with a PM.
TwistText 2 years ago
i thought your next review was the last great game of the 80s!!!
thepoopsniff 2 years ago
This is not an oficial Arcade Guts review. I have never played SF4 in the arcades. Also i dont consider this My review but rather Uriah and Blain's Review, i just put the thing together.
corndog125nalald 2 years ago
frist
seanwtfgamer 2 years ago
Kill yourself.
JPhands 2 years ago
god for you.
blade1550 2 years ago 2