The truth has finally appeared. The true culprits of 911 have been exposed. That new video is the un-debunkable truth about 911! We truthers have won!
The Gulf of Tonkin was NOT a false flag attack gullible shill.
In 1995, retired Vietnamese Defense Minister Vo Nguyen Giap, meeting with former Secretary of Defense McNamara, denied that Vietnamese gunboats had attacked American destroyers on August 4, while admitting to the attack on August 2.
"McNamara asks Giap: What happened in Tonkin Gulf?". (November 9, 1995). Associated Press
Read a history book instead of watching Loose Change edition one.
It's impossible for a fire to do the work of a professionally executed controlled demoltion. A perfectly symetrical collapse, all core columns failing simultaneously. You don't need architects and engineers to point this out, common sense is enough.
The perpetrators can break many laws, but they cannot break the laws of physics. WTC7 provides absolute proof that 911 was staged. Thankfully, the majority are starting to realise this, only fools and youtube shills are left to deny.
*sigh* i dont deny that the government/media lie to us. but i use rationale thought and common sense to identify what the lies are and what is just paranoid nonsense. maybe you should do the same! the fires were indeed blazing hot, as is evidenced by the video footage and photographs people like you so often ignore. i'll ask again, why can steven jones admit he was wrong and you cant?
yes building 7 had damage! yes they had fires, (why the fires happened i do not know) all the other wtc buildings around the twins got damaged too just as bad if not worse then wtc7 but did not catch fire of collapse, only 7 (which was the most important of the wtc buildings). but the fires where scarce and not like torches, they where not hot enough to melt or weaken steel, yet it still collapsed. (even if it was the fires where scarcely placed, thus only parts would have weakened! notallatonce
Why dont you idiots watch the UNEDITED video of Building 7 collapsing, and see how it collapsed progressively and did not free fall AT ALL.
Fucking idiots watching this edited videos. How ironic that it is YOU being lied to. It really is fascinating how thick you all are.
The UNEDITED version of the building 7 can be seen at ItWasTyped. com under the Building 7 post in the conspiracy theory section. Raging fires and all. The ENTIRE collapse, no editing bullshit.
@culturebully3 why do you idiots always think that videos that obviously aren't edited are? pretty soon all the videos once thought as unedited will OF A SUDDEN BE EDITED BECAUSE of all the evidence going against your lousy rotten corrupt government? lol i have to go on that site to see an "unedited" video? lol
why don't you wake up and realize we use the videos you idiots try to use to prove YOUR points and fail miserably at doing. that site is a blog for personal opinions give me a link!
@sh9683 no my old son, they are not the same videos. tell me this: why can steven jones, one of the people who started this whole demolition theory nonsense, admit that he was wrong and you cant? steven jones and some other conspiracy theorist clown looked like dumbasses and admitted that they ignored all the evidence and even CARRIED ON lying so as not to disappoint gullible little morons like you.
It's all there at ItWasTyped. com, under the conspiracy theories section. So, what now?
@culturebully3 if you had a brain and two eyes you would know its not nonsense! look at clips yourself! i have no problem looking at videos that show the full extent of the damage and fire and laugh at your retarded theory! why? because the fires weren't blazing hot, they where scarce and only confined to one side! that my friend is all you need to know it was not due to fire but a CD. you on the other hand is too brainwashed by your government that anything the sya goes, anything else is a lie!
These "experts" could not find their own ass using both hands without an instructional video and a personal Tutor. What a bunch of idiots, STARTING with Alex Jones, radio disk jockey secret agent.
@Merlin5by5 well you can't turn your computer on without obama sitting next to you telling you every button you need to press and you can't type without him telling you what to type
"well you can't turn your computer on without obama sitting next to you telling you every button you need to press and you can't type without him telling you what to type"
SURE you can, pull the wire, no one begs you to post conspiracy crap on youtube.
The problem is that almost Everyone now believes that 9/11 and JFK was done by the inner Government but there is nothing we can do about it because they control all the media, the law enforcement and the politicians. We need outside help if we are going to defeat these evil bastards.
10 years and people are still yelling, "Inside Job"
True WT7 was not hit by a jet, it was damaged by WT1 falling on it, which took out 25% of its south side, destroyed it's water supply and ruptured the diesel storage tanks inside it.
WT7 burned for 5 hours. How could any type of explosive possibly survive 5 hours in an uncontrolled fire?
After destroying both towers and killing thousands of people, why would 'they' be concerned about WT7 falling sideways and damaging yet another building?
1)There are photos and eyewitness reports of the damage to WT7.
2)If you're seen videos of WT1's collapse, you will see WT7 being struck.
3)WT7 had diesel generators and fuel tanks in its lower levels.
4)Firefighters report they were unable to control the fires in WT7 due to the fact that water lines in the area had been damaged. If the firefighters could have controled the fires, they would have (unless you are claiming that the NYFD is also part of some cover up).
Alex Jones is an idiot. NO ONE claims that the steel MELTED. It was WEAKENED enough to make it bend, which caused it to collapse on itself. You dont believe that a fire blazing for ten hours weakens steel, go ahead and TRY IT YOURSELF.
Ever heard of the word coincidence? thousands of people would have witnessed explosives being installed, fire would cause a building to tip over completely? how else can a building with fire damage fall?
Yup it was controlled demolition oh well the government did it and theres nothing we can do about it we just have to live with it. Now lets watch some exciting television. Who wants to be a millionaire, or american idol, Ill go with dancing with the stars
@catdaddyegon I'd like to ask you the same thing I've asked at least 71 other people here on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
So you're trying to say that they came into the building analyzed it and rigged it with explosives and no one noticed it but then they decided"I know!!! Lets fly planes into it even though it's rigged with explosives!". Somehow i'm not buying this. Get your news from people other then Alex Jones! What would be the point in doing this? Boredom?. Lol. Ya know what? 8 tracks never happened!!! =D
@cruisersism I don't they needed to kill tons of people just to go and invade a country. It's not like we ever needed any real reason to invade any other country. Plus why would bin laden go ahead with this idea. "ok after you blame me for a terrorist attack you can come invade my country for some oil. Then i'll just stay in hiding for the rest of my life all for you wonderful Americans!!".
@cruisersism I don't have to. I used to believe all the stuff you believe. Reading all this stuff made me stop believing this crap. Just remember you don't need a guy with a creepy voice to get your point across. If you do... Then something is up! Do you get your news from anyone other then Alex Jones and conspiracy sites? I also wanted to let you know that a lot of that footage you watch was doctored in a program called after effects. Another reason to not believe this crap.
exactly baltimore ...wait i know ..lets crash airliners into the buildings AND also use several hundreds of nija expert demolitions ppl working everynight FOR years ..who are ALSO invisible apparently ..because just having the fully loaded airplanes crashing into the towers is just NOT gonna be DRAMATIC enough .
even though the pure logistics ,number of ppl incl in the loop and pure exposure to discovery is a 100% certainty .sure, lets do THAT and do the planes TOO ..f#king silly children .
People also fail to realize that not all controlled demolitions are created equally. They don't HAVE to be neat and perfect. It would actually be easier to make it messy and chaotic. Since they weren't concerned with containing the blast, Buildings 1 and 2 could have been rigged to blow in the way it did with minimal effort, using a few strategically located high-powered charges, and thermite. MUCH easier than the more "controlled" controlled demolitions of the modern day (i.e. Building 7).
I love it when we get the real story. I guess, Bin Laden, wasnt the threat everyone was told. I wonder if he's still dead, and who will they blame in the future.??
how is it that when I see other controlled demos, there are always sequential
bangs and flashes and yet even with nearby video and audio all you hear is the collapse, as was the case w/the towers? for all those who mistrust or outright hate our government, please leave and find yourself a better one..like North Korea
@1223baddad The bangs and flashes of building 7 were much much further apart than a normal demolition for obvious reasons. But you can find video's showing the flashes and pops going off + eye witness's from building 7 saying bombs were going off inside. Plenty of info on it , just gotta look m8
wow everyone says IT WAS AN INSIDE JOB! who says terrorists can't set up bombs in buildings and crash their airplane in and set the bombs off at the same time they crash? besides u people dont even have evidence that FBI operatives planted explosives in and drove the airplane in..........
"it's perfectly clear that this is an inside job" yes - the inside of the building collapsed because of a 7 hour inferno, and the shell followed it down. that's an inside job.
@popeyroach brah, listen, you don't know what you're talking about, some ugly kid made loose change, he has literally no engineering experience whatsoever, but come on, brah, he made a movie, you can't lie in movies
nice try, buddy, but you're not fooling anybody with your common sense logic
@popeyroach brah, listen, you don't know what you're talking about, some ugly kid made loose change, he has literally no engineering experience whatsoever, but come on, brah, he made a movie, you can't lie in movies
nice try, buddy, but you're not fooling anybody with your common sense logic
@popeyroach Yeah, a 1st in history, how many other steel framed buildings burned for 10, 15 and 20 plus hours and did not crumble like building 7?
Building 7 fell at free fall speed, meaning all the major support columns had to give at the same time, doubt a small fires could do that, but hey you seem to be the expert.
WHO CARES? Human beings have perpertrated atrocities since our beginning; holocaust, the crusades, genocides, pillages, wars etc. so what's the big deal? just embrace yourselves for the next ones to come. It's what we humans do best
Larry S said "they made that decision to pull"... as in the action was going to be taken to intentionally take down the building.... And it takes weeks to set up a building for a controlled demolition- as the experts state here. My mind is completely fucking blown away at how painfully obvious it is that this points to an inside job. It TAKES WEEKS yet NYFFs can set up a controlled demo in less than a day. What the fuck....What the fuck? WHAT THE FUCK!?!
@GeneralMaximus4 The quote by Larry is completely twisted around. He is referring to "pull" the rescue mission. "Pull it" is NOT a term used by personnel demolishing a building. There was also NEVER ANY physical evidence pointing towards a demolition.
@As3sinoL0C0 who gives a fuck, building 7 wasn't even hit by a plane. a fire will not make a building collapse like that, come on ppl wake the fuck up this shit is so fuckin obvious. if u believe the "official" 911 story you either work for the gov or you are just in fuckin denial.....we need 2 stand up and take OUR country back from these scumbag elites like the rothschilds,rockefellers, henry kissinger,zbignew brzezinski ect....we need to start goin up an placing them under citizens arrest lol
@pctG304 Thank you for that. I for one will never stop until these criminals are rotting in prison for all eternity. It was not 19 muslim hijackers who hated our freedom that did 911. It was the CIA, MI6, the KGB, Pakistani intelligence services and the Mossad and probably a few other intelligence services. What these fools don't realize is that it's we the people against all the governments of the world. It's that simple. Either accept the truth or take the blue pill and go back to sleep.
@As3sinoL0C0 I don't know if the term "pull it" is used by personnel doing controlled demolition or not, but I believe it's totally obvious that in this case it meant "pulling the plug" on the efforts to contain the fire. The notion that it meant a "command" to demo the building is ridiculous, childish.
There was probably never any evidence RELEASED of controlled demo either, but then again - if gov. did it on purpose, wouldn't they cover it up? And it DID look 100% as controlled demolition.
Explosions are pretty common in fires. Use Google News to search "fire" and "explosion" and you'll get a torrent of news stories in which explosions occurred in fires.
FOX reporter Jeffrey Shapiro says several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told him that Larry Silverstein was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the WTC 7.
Plus I've heard the silly Thermite/Thermate theories. They have all the common traces of Thermite/Thermate and say they have "Thermite/Thermate" for sure, what a load of bull. They are called COMMON traces for a reason. For example, Sulfur is in Thermite/Thermate, sulfur is also in the dry wall in the towers, explained. Plus you can't use Thermite/Thermate to take down a building, if it was efficient it would be used...NO building has been brought down with T in History, never will
I see no detonation cords from the base of the building, no squibs(no real squibs on towers either), or flashes. The biggest give away that it wasn't a controlled demolition? Every one I've heard, was loud as hell, it would be really difficult to hear someone talking over it. When reviewing Building 7 footage, there are no multiple explosions heard right before the towers fell, and there are people talking softly and you can hear them perfectly. That is the biggest give away that it was no CD.
This looks nothing like a controlled demolition. With every demolition I've seen, the building falls almost inside its own foot print, with debris rarely outside of it , Building 7 caused billions of dollars of damage blocks away (Deutsche Bank had to be rebuilt), that is the opposite of inside it's foot print. It would be free fall for ENTIRE collapse as well most likely, NIST said there was only 2.3 seconds of free fall (which makes sense). I see no CD characteristics
Ok, so we can't all agree on the fact that it was a Controlled Demo, but.... those billowing dust clouds DO look quite alike! And those come from ALL 3 buildings!
First of all Alex Jones, we don't agree on shit. I can't even be convinced that commercial airliners hit the building. There is no definitive video showing a long shot of anything hitting the buildings. When I say "long shot", I mean a shot showing the plane 2 miles out, 1 mile out and then impact. All video's I have seen only show about 5 seconds until impact. Many people took video that day. Where are the long shots?
@Daddyo930 I can't even be convinced that America exists. Sure there's lots of video and stuff but how do we know that it's not faked? The media lie all the time and government. I think America is a fictional place created by the elites that control the government and the media.
You guys have got to move into the 21st century. Old school methods would never have been considered. Radio detonation eliminates the need for all this det cord that would have been found by people not looking for it (wow).
MANY first responders reported explosions and their information suppressed.
You have got to open your mind to the reality that surrounds you. Nothing is as it seems. The intel community runs most everything and disinformation is standard procedure. You're brain washed.
@Akileze Well when you consider how tiny the fragments of bone were that they were pulling out of there.......If you're pulling out things that small a couple of miles of det cord is going to stand out.
So these controlled demolitions, several tens of tons of high explosives all being ripple fired over a couple of seconds......how did they manage to muffle the sound of all that? Where are the flashes of the explosives going off? Where are the burn marks, the det cord and the copper plating? How did they manage to steal several thousand tons of steel if there was no steel recovered or is that a quote mine?
@hutchinson1995 They sifted through it with a fine tooth comb and nobody seems to have found a trace of detcord, copper, the burn marks associated with controled demolition.
@ketsan Could you even admit that NIST never tested for explosives in direct violation of NFP procedure? Did your handlers say that you are allowed to admit that?
@Daddyo930 The explosives that don't go bang? Are those the explosives you're talking about? You realise that it's more plausible that genetically engineered metal eating hamsters were used to gnaw through beams causing the collapse than that explosives were used? Did anyone check for hamster droppings? No? See a government cover up, you can tell by the lack of evidence.
@olddouchebag they said explosions, not bombs. what's in an office building? computers, printer and copy machines, gas pipes, electrical circuits, diesel fuel tanks, generators, elevators, and just about any other material you can find in an office building that can 'explode' .
If there were explosives planted in World Trade Center 7, they would have been heard from miles around and clearly recorded on tape. Watch any video of buildings being demolished with explosives and you will hear a series of very loud bangs throughout the buildings. There are no sounds of explosions recorded on tape from WTC 7. Correct me if I'm wrong.
@TimothyRaymond1 You mean like these ones : watch?v=0YvrKfWkxdw ? As 1 of the firemen is stating "We need to get back, 7`s exploding". These particular explosions are LOUD!
plus the only "expert" named in this video is a theologist professor... RIGHT, a person who believes in angels, devils, hell, adam, eve, is surely someone who might have a neat take on FACTS in general.. hahah
@WilliamAztech Fact such as the ones NIST completely ignores...? That there was no measurable deceleration of the falling top section of WTC 1 on alleged impact with the lower part of the building...? And that the demoltion wave (sometimes referred to as "pancaking floors") was moving down at pace with (and locally even faster than) ejected and freely falling steel sections of the perimeter walls..? And facts such as they have not analyzed the collapse mechanisms PULVERIZING the concrete..?
@WilliamAztech ---> the opposite - hence should have suffered the exact same consequenses on impact as the lower 98 floors. What can be seen happen to the top is a) that it is almost completely disintegrated before the lower part begun collapsing, and b) that the roofline was not decelerating on alleged impact between the two blocks. In other words: there was no impact, and some other energy source had to have been been present to destroy the top section before the lower part began collapsing.
@Funkadelic2 that's not true. the destruction of the floors below the impacted floors are at the same rate of the destruction of the floors above that point. The destruction is mostly beyond visible reach, since the interior was collapsing a little earlier than the exterior. Plus, soon everything was covered with dust. The idea it was a uniform pancaking of whole floors is cartoonish. Sometimes I think many people are not watching the same videos as I am...
@WilliamAztech It is very obviolusly happening exactly the way I just described. Those columns are passed by the main wave of destruction before being ejected. I can point it out very precisely for you: At 0 : 12 (and at every 10th second throughout the entire clip: 0 : 22, 0 : 32, 0 : 42...) those columns can be seen emerging from the already descending dust clouds, being hurled out with great lateral force towards building 7. There is no escaping that fact..
@Funkadelic2 I really don't see it as being hurled out with great lateral force. Like I said, the great amount of dust clouds preclude you from seeing exactly what is happening. If the steel columns you refer to are the exterior façade ones, that's a big chunk of façade going sideways, there is no need of explosives for that to happen. If you picture it as a big chunk of façade being cut loose and falling sideways, when eventually the lower part breaks, than you get that image.
@WilliamAztech ----> you can see the very same event even more clearly. At 7 : 47 you can see it as well, and you can compare the behavior of those columns to those of the still standing parts of the core, which had a more natural way of falling straight down once severed. To have such heavy debris going +300 feet sideways from about 800 feet up means huge lateral forces being present even where the main collapse had already passed the level of the building from where those columns were coming.
@WilliamAztech If you cannot see that those columns I referred, and pointed the exact time position for, are emerging from the dust (although of course there's still some dust surrounding them too) as the wave of destruction has already passed by (they are emerging right at 0 : 12 and on the left side of the top of the "canapé" where the sunlight is shining on top of it. At 1 : 57 in this clip:
@WilliamAztech ----> also (or, at least SHOULD have been) tremendous resistence present from the lower part of the structures. It is a simple fact that the lower part of the building constituted approximately 90% of the total mass of the structure, where the steel columns were getting increasingly thicker towards the base.
The top section of WTC 1 was not a solid block of steel, more rigid than the lower part in any sense at all, rather ---->
@WilliamAztech I really don't accept dividing people into "them" and "us". And nobody is ignoring any potentlal energy releases at all. There was a lot of potential gravitational engery present, sure, but there was ---->
there's an obvious difference between the other implosion shown here, where you can see actual explosions throughout the buildings, whereas in WTC7 you see no explosions really, the building just falls down. Some people seem to underestimate what the "debris" which hit WTC7 was, like as if it were a few little concrete crumbles. Plus, everyone knew WTC7 was coming down. I remember precisely watching it on tv, and it was no secret everyone was waiting for it to go down.
@thematt121295 After reading your comment I seriously thought to myself; "Can a person actually type something this ridiculously stupid & actually believe someone will take him seriously?" Then I realized you must be 1 of 2 things; A) You are an ape named Matt & your zoo-keeper gave you temporary access to a computer, or B) You are a retarded 12 year old that just learned how to go potty & wipe his own ass. I'll go with B. Now go learn how to tie your shoes douche bag.
That comment and you having your head in your ass would be funny..
except that people have died, gone to war--> more people died and suffered.. kids have been raped, wounded and killed.. The resources have been given to a handfull of corporations.. Laws have been changed to strip people from their rights.. and their wealth stolen..
And the truth still remains hidden from the public..
whats funny is there has to be experts to bring a building down. but a random fire is supposed to do that as well. so next time anyone wants to bring down a building, you can save your money by just setting it on fire. forget paying those experts to bring it down! hell, i will start a new company, every controlled demolition company will be out of business, i just need gas and matches haha
why no sound of dynamite explosions?? no blasting caps, wires or other demolition materials?? where is your proof???????? conspiracy theorists and corrupt govts have at least 1 thing in common.. NO PROOF. you're all mindless idiots..
@miamiwax Now now, when have cold hard facts been any use to conspiracy theorists? I mean the caps and basement explosions aside (or lack of), imagine if it took 4 months to set up a controlled demolition, with diggers and men drilling into the structure and foundation to weaken it and place the explosives. With miles of det cord all over the building, no one would have noticed that. Oh and imagine if all demolition companies in the world said 'pull it' is not a term they use.Facts are pointless
who cares what "pull it" means , all i need is eyes to know that building 7 was blown up on purpose. i dont even need to watch it twice come on ppl , u dont need to be an expoert to have common sense. and the fact that the commission report (500+pages) didnt mention it ONE time , puts the nail in the coffin and proves without a doubt that whole day was planned out year ago by this govt.. i would suggest anybody that supports the official BS read the commission report free on google
Professor Griffin is a theologian, not a structural engineer. 95% of structural engineers see no evidence of a controlled demolition. Why do you believe a theologian over the structural engineers?
@peterloohunt 95% of those SE's u mention have NOT and have NEVER stated IN PUBLIC that they buy the official explanation. U may guess why? If they would have to explain why they think they official NIST account is somehow scientific & true, they would make a complete fool of themselves.
Obviously u haven't noticed all the distortions, lies and omissions in those thick reports. Besides that u seem to lack knowledge of basic physics and chemistry, and odds as well. Come on dude, wake up.
you dont need a structural engineer to tell you that something is wrong with way that WTC 7 collapse. You stupid ideas are back in a corner so you arm yourself with "science". it is ridiculously stupid to believe an engineer to what is evidently simple!
I've never heard a demolitions expert use the term "pull it" to mean "destroy it with explosives." I"m pretty sure this is just a bit of truther dogma that no one is supposed to question.
First of all I never said it was the only reason we went to war lol. its so much more complicated than that. Im simply saying this conflict has not hurt big oil...
@19d4life The memo recorded the head of the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) as expressing the view following his recent visit to Washington that "[George W.] Bush wanted to remove Saddam Hussein, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were
@longanddeadly The memo recorded the head of the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) as expressing the view following his recent visit to Washington that "[George W.] Bush wanted to remove Saddam Hussein, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were
Respond to this video... were being fixed around the policy." It also quoted Foreign Secretary Jack Straw as saying that it was clear that Bush had "made up his mind" to take military action but that "the case was thin",
Alex, Dumbass, Jones' logic; "Building 7 was CD'd to fall in it's own footprint so it wouldn't damage other buildings around it." Yeah, because our government is evil enough to destroy and kill so much on 9/11 in the interest of keeping other buildings around it safe. It's fun to watch you idiot twoofers contradict logic, yourselves, and your own conspiracies. You mushrooms wouldn't know logic if it knocked on your door, pissed on your shoes, then invited itself in to eat all of your food.
@longanddeadly Well, unless those files were somehow extremely explosive in nature and had some direct bearing on the building coming down, then I guess it really doesn't matter what was in there, now does it? I like how you dumbasses who follow this jackwagon think you're somehow "enlightened" to the truth, when all you are are sheep to a different shepard. What flavor of Kool Aid is Alex serving this week? I hear the grape flavor is to die for.
I find it funny that all of the sheep who think WTC 7 went down by controlled demolition do so on the premis that explosions don't make sound. You idiots can't even take 2 seconds to see the lack explosive noise on all of the footage (much of it is in this very video). A boom loud enough to control demo WTC7 would have been reported on IMMEDIATELY, not as an afterthought as it was in the media. And before you wack jobs say the media is in on it, CNN and MSNBC were among those not reporting.
@bambam9969 Don't get butthurt because a loser who still plays with toys put you in your place........which is at the bottom of the intellectual food chain. Keep up the "twoofer" fight, dumbass.
(911 total proof bombs were planted) 20 million views. 30+ thousand (likes). Debunking videos, LOL lucky to have 50 thousand views.with more dislikes than likes, more people are waking up every day. The debunkers are a JOKE. LOL
@bambam9969 It's pretty pathetic of you to make that observation, considering the majority of people polled on this subject do not think it was an inside job, and that the anit-Bush news media isn't even reporting on it. Even Bill Maher, who despises the Bush administration, thinks you "twoofers" are whack jobs. LOL, you think YouTube views and likes/dislikes have anything to do with reality? Stupid people congregate around the internet, "twoofers" are a product of that fact.
9/11 Truthers and Controlled Demolition believers are government SHILLS paid to discret rational, useful criticism of the immoral Bush government/ 9/11 facts. Because if they actually were onto something they'd be dead by now.
I dont work for the government at all, i build furniture for living.
And how the hell is my diagreeing with you saying "we wouldnt all be dead if we were on to something" should say to you or anyone that im speading mis-information,, if thats how you honestly see my remark, then maybe you should go back to watching playhouse disney and hanna momatnna.
/watch?v=8QVa_XikHYE
The truth has finally appeared. The true culprits of 911 have been exposed. That new video is the un-debunkable truth about 911! We truthers have won!
MazJax 1 week ago
@MazJax
I suppose thousands of tons of concrete and steel falling hundreds of feet on WTC 7 had NOTHING to do with the collapse?
How about the 30 foot hole in WTC 7's facade?
How about the southwest corner of WTC 7 chopped off?
Please explain firefighters predicting WTC 7's collapse HOURS ahead?
911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
ctcole77 1 week ago
@ctcole77 Hey dude, I was joking!
MazJax 1 week ago
@ctcole77 So a "chopped off" portion and a 30 foot hole on the side of WTC 7 caused it to crimp in the middle and free fall like that?
Ramel34 1 week ago
The CIA will not let me post the Truth. They are blocking me!
Wayne1987475 2 weeks ago
Gulf of Tonkin was false flag to start the Vietnam war 9/11 was false flag to start war in Middle east
jaycedace 1 month ago
@jaycedace
vouch
hamberg42 2 weeks ago
@jaycedace
The Gulf of Tonkin was NOT a false flag attack gullible shill.
In 1995, retired Vietnamese Defense Minister Vo Nguyen Giap, meeting with former Secretary of Defense McNamara, denied that Vietnamese gunboats had attacked American destroyers on August 4, while admitting to the attack on August 2.
"McNamara asks Giap: What happened in Tonkin Gulf?". (November 9, 1995). Associated Press
Read a history book instead of watching Loose Change edition one.
911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
ctcole77 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The collapse of WTC 7 and other 9/11 events are all fully explained on this website: WWWdotDEBUNKING911dotCOM
ParagramTree 1 month ago
It's impossible for a fire to do the work of a professionally executed controlled demoltion. A perfectly symetrical collapse, all core columns failing simultaneously. You don't need architects and engineers to point this out, common sense is enough.
The perpetrators can break many laws, but they cannot break the laws of physics. WTC7 provides absolute proof that 911 was staged. Thankfully, the majority are starting to realise this, only fools and youtube shills are left to deny.
westy636R 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@westy636R The collapse of WTC 7 and other 9/11 events are all fully explained on this website: WWWdotDEBUNKING911dotCOM
ParagramTree 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@westy636R The collapse of WTC 7 and other 9/11 events are all fully explained on this website: WWWdotDEBUNKING911dotCOM
ParagramTree 1 month ago
then why don't these people explain how no controlled thermite was EVER found at the site?
ryanmacdaddy1000 2 months ago
@ryanmacdaddy1000 Military grade nano thermite was actually found...
NecKClippA 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NecKClippA The collapse of WTC 7 and other 9/11 events are all fully explained on this website: WWWdotDEBUNKING911dotCOM
ParagramTree 1 month ago
@ryanmacdaddy1000 they didnt look, - according to NIST
HardcoreJungFunk 2 months ago
ya this is all bull
hutchinson1995 2 months ago
*sigh* i dont deny that the government/media lie to us. but i use rationale thought and common sense to identify what the lies are and what is just paranoid nonsense. maybe you should do the same! the fires were indeed blazing hot, as is evidenced by the video footage and photographs people like you so often ignore. i'll ask again, why can steven jones admit he was wrong and you cant?
ItWasTyped. com
culturebully3 2 months ago 2
@culturebull give me links unedited links if every single video ive watched is edited PLEASE GIVE ME LINKS TO UNEDITED ONES I"D LIKE TO SEE THEM!
btw your itwastyped is a blog not a legit website!
sh9683 2 months ago
yes building 7 had damage! yes they had fires, (why the fires happened i do not know) all the other wtc buildings around the twins got damaged too just as bad if not worse then wtc7 but did not catch fire of collapse, only 7 (which was the most important of the wtc buildings). but the fires where scarce and not like torches, they where not hot enough to melt or weaken steel, yet it still collapsed. (even if it was the fires where scarcely placed, thus only parts would have weakened! notallatonce
sh9683 2 months ago
Why dont you idiots watch the UNEDITED video of Building 7 collapsing, and see how it collapsed progressively and did not free fall AT ALL.
Fucking idiots watching this edited videos. How ironic that it is YOU being lied to. It really is fascinating how thick you all are.
The UNEDITED version of the building 7 can be seen at ItWasTyped. com under the Building 7 post in the conspiracy theory section. Raging fires and all. The ENTIRE collapse, no editing bullshit.
Intelligent people welcome
culturebully3 2 months ago
@culturebully3 why do you idiots always think that videos that obviously aren't edited are? pretty soon all the videos once thought as unedited will OF A SUDDEN BE EDITED BECAUSE of all the evidence going against your lousy rotten corrupt government? lol i have to go on that site to see an "unedited" video? lol
why don't you wake up and realize we use the videos you idiots try to use to prove YOUR points and fail miserably at doing. that site is a blog for personal opinions give me a link!
sh9683 2 months ago
@sh9683 no my old son, they are not the same videos. tell me this: why can steven jones, one of the people who started this whole demolition theory nonsense, admit that he was wrong and you cant? steven jones and some other conspiracy theorist clown looked like dumbasses and admitted that they ignored all the evidence and even CARRIED ON lying so as not to disappoint gullible little morons like you.
It's all there at ItWasTyped. com, under the conspiracy theories section. So, what now?
culturebully3 2 months ago
@culturebully3 if you had a brain and two eyes you would know its not nonsense! look at clips yourself! i have no problem looking at videos that show the full extent of the damage and fire and laugh at your retarded theory! why? because the fires weren't blazing hot, they where scarce and only confined to one side! that my friend is all you need to know it was not due to fire but a CD. you on the other hand is too brainwashed by your government that anything the sya goes, anything else is a lie!
sh9683 2 months ago
No Alex you're an idiot. No one has ever claimed the steel melted.
So why do you have a radio program? With more idiots like you who listen to you?
Why do people listen to this fool?
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
University of Theology? Lol
EaglesStandProud 3 months ago
,,inside job, duh!
It'$ sad that peeps that have never built anything will believe anything their t.v. tells them...
wolfdaddy205 3 months ago
These "experts" could not find their own ass using both hands without an instructional video and a personal Tutor. What a bunch of idiots, STARTING with Alex Jones, radio disk jockey secret agent.
Merlin5by5 3 months ago
@Merlin5by5 well you can't turn your computer on without obama sitting next to you telling you every button you need to press and you can't type without him telling you what to type
sh9683 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sh9683
"well you can't turn your computer on without obama sitting next to you telling you every button you need to press and you can't type without him telling you what to type"
SURE you can, pull the wire, no one begs you to post conspiracy crap on youtube.
Merlin5by5 2 months ago
The problem is that almost Everyone now believes that 9/11 and JFK was done by the inner Government but there is nothing we can do about it because they control all the media, the law enforcement and the politicians. We need outside help if we are going to defeat these evil bastards.
cruisersism 3 months ago
10 years and people are still yelling, "Inside Job"
True WT7 was not hit by a jet, it was damaged by WT1 falling on it, which took out 25% of its south side, destroyed it's water supply and ruptured the diesel storage tanks inside it.
WT7 burned for 5 hours. How could any type of explosive possibly survive 5 hours in an uncontrolled fire?
After destroying both towers and killing thousands of people, why would 'they' be concerned about WT7 falling sideways and damaging yet another building?
GrendelNin 3 months ago
@GrendelNin prove it? lets see all the evidence you talk about?
cruisersism 3 months ago
@cruisersism Uh....ok.
1)There are photos and eyewitness reports of the damage to WT7.
2)If you're seen videos of WT1's collapse, you will see WT7 being struck.
3)WT7 had diesel generators and fuel tanks in its lower levels.
4)Firefighters report they were unable to control the fires in WT7 due to the fact that water lines in the area had been damaged. If the firefighters could have controled the fires, they would have (unless you are claiming that the NYFD is also part of some cover up).
GrendelNin 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GrendelNin lets see all the evidence you talk about? SHOW it to us.
cruisersism 3 months ago
Alex Jones is an idiot. NO ONE claims that the steel MELTED. It was WEAKENED enough to make it bend, which caused it to collapse on itself. You dont believe that a fire blazing for ten hours weakens steel, go ahead and TRY IT YOURSELF.
OpethNation 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@OpethNation prove it? lets see all the evidence you talk about?
cruisersism 3 months ago
Ever heard of the word coincidence? thousands of people would have witnessed explosives being installed, fire would cause a building to tip over completely? how else can a building with fire damage fall?
CastleMKnights 4 months ago
Yup it was controlled demolition oh well the government did it and theres nothing we can do about it we just have to live with it. Now lets watch some exciting television. Who wants to be a millionaire, or american idol, Ill go with dancing with the stars
bio3dx 4 months ago
Tower 7, not hit by planes, no jet fuel fire, collapses in on itself but there was no inside job hun? EXPLAIN IT THEN!
catdaddyegon 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@catdaddyegon I'd like to ask you the same thing I've asked at least 71 other people here on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
azul8811 4 months ago
So you're trying to say that they came into the building analyzed it and rigged it with explosives and no one noticed it but then they decided"I know!!! Lets fly planes into it even though it's rigged with explosives!". Somehow i'm not buying this. Get your news from people other then Alex Jones! What would be the point in doing this? Boredom?. Lol. Ya know what? 8 tracks never happened!!! =D
TheUnbiasedGamer 4 months ago
@TheUnbiasedGamer hahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa fool
cruisersism 3 months ago
@cruisersism Yeah silly me! Why think logically? No!!! Everyone is out to get you and do weird shit for no apparent reason!!!!
TheUnbiasedGamer 3 months ago
@TheUnbiasedGamer Reason`s? how about WAR, the invasion of another country for its resources? OIL.
cruisersism 3 months ago
@cruisersism I don't they needed to kill tons of people just to go and invade a country. It's not like we ever needed any real reason to invade any other country. Plus why would bin laden go ahead with this idea. "ok after you blame me for a terrorist attack you can come invade my country for some oil. Then i'll just stay in hiding for the rest of my life all for you wonderful Americans!!".
TheUnbiasedGamer 3 months ago
@TheUnbiasedGamer READ UP ON OPERATIONS NORTHWOOD.
cruisersism 3 months ago
@cruisersism I don't have to. I used to believe all the stuff you believe. Reading all this stuff made me stop believing this crap. Just remember you don't need a guy with a creepy voice to get your point across. If you do... Then something is up! Do you get your news from anyone other then Alex Jones and conspiracy sites? I also wanted to let you know that a lot of that footage you watch was doctored in a program called after effects. Another reason to not believe this crap.
TheUnbiasedGamer 3 months ago
@TheUnbiasedGameri I suggest you go back to your beliefs, You can run but you cannot hide.
cruisersism 3 months ago
@cruisersism Lol! Sorry i don't believe things that make no sense. At least anymore.
TheUnbiasedGamer 3 months ago
@TheUnbiasedGamer Evil thrives when good men do nothing. Don`t give up on the truth no matter how hard it hurts.
cruisersism 3 months ago
@cruisersism I don't think that's the truth. Research lead me to believe this was false.
TheUnbiasedGamer 3 months ago
@TheUnbiasedGamer Amercia false flag.
cruisersism 3 months ago
exactly baltimore ...wait i know ..lets crash airliners into the buildings AND also use several hundreds of nija expert demolitions ppl working everynight FOR years ..who are ALSO invisible apparently ..because just having the fully loaded airplanes crashing into the towers is just NOT gonna be DRAMATIC enough .
even though the pure logistics ,number of ppl incl in the loop and pure exposure to discovery is a 100% certainty .sure, lets do THAT and do the planes TOO ..f#king silly children .
woodenmajor 4 months ago
NIST spokesperson Michael Neuman was challenged by Hartford Advocate reporter Jennifer Abel on this glaring omission in the WTC report
ABEL: what about that letter where NIST said it didn’t look for evidence of explosives?
NEUMAN: Right, because there was no evidence of that.
ABEL: But how can you know there’s no evidence if you don’t look for it first?
NEUMAN: If you’re looking for something that isn’t there, you’re wasting your time
YOU CAN"T MAKE THIS STUFF UP!
A TOTAL WHITEWASH!
MajorBuckSnort 4 months ago
People also fail to realize that not all controlled demolitions are created equally. They don't HAVE to be neat and perfect. It would actually be easier to make it messy and chaotic. Since they weren't concerned with containing the blast, Buildings 1 and 2 could have been rigged to blow in the way it did with minimal effort, using a few strategically located high-powered charges, and thermite. MUCH easier than the more "controlled" controlled demolitions of the modern day (i.e. Building 7).
cauberallies 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WE HAVE THE VIDEO OF WTC7 BEING DEMOLISHED. THE VIDEO SHOWS THE EXPLOSIONS AND IT HAS THE AUDIO. ...ARREST LARRY SILVERSTEIN, NOW!!!
SEARCH: "!MUST WATCH NOW! Visible Explosions !NEW VIDEO! SEPT 2011 WTC Building 7 Controlled Demolition"
Born2Flesh 4 months ago
I love it when we get the real story. I guess, Bin Laden, wasnt the threat everyone was told. I wonder if he's still dead, and who will they blame in the future.??
rigthfight 4 months ago
how is it that when I see other controlled demos, there are always sequential
bangs and flashes and yet even with nearby video and audio all you hear is the collapse, as was the case w/the towers? for all those who mistrust or outright hate our government, please leave and find yourself a better one..like North Korea
1223baddad 4 months ago
@1223baddad The bangs and flashes of building 7 were much much further apart than a normal demolition for obvious reasons. But you can find video's showing the flashes and pops going off + eye witness's from building 7 saying bombs were going off inside. Plenty of info on it , just gotta look m8
galaxything 4 months ago
wow everyone says IT WAS AN INSIDE JOB! who says terrorists can't set up bombs in buildings and crash their airplane in and set the bombs off at the same time they crash? besides u people dont even have evidence that FBI operatives planted explosives in and drove the airplane in..........
CommanderMattShepard 4 months ago
@CommanderMattShepard Are you honestly that fucking stupid? Wow, thats all i can say.
HordesOfEvilMarch 4 months ago
@CommanderMattShepard why would terroist fly planes in to a building that they have set with explosives .........MORON.
BaltimoreG13 4 months ago
"it's perfectly clear that this is an inside job" yes - the inside of the building collapsed because of a 7 hour inferno, and the shell followed it down. that's an inside job.
popeyroach 4 months ago
@popeyroach brah, listen, you don't know what you're talking about, some ugly kid made loose change, he has literally no engineering experience whatsoever, but come on, brah, he made a movie, you can't lie in movies
nice try, buddy, but you're not fooling anybody with your common sense logic
sbt200224 4 months ago
@popeyroach brah, listen, you don't know what you're talking about, some ugly kid made loose change, he has literally no engineering experience whatsoever, but come on, brah, he made a movie, you can't lie in movies
nice try, buddy, but you're not fooling anybody with your common sense logic
sbt200224 4 months ago
@popeyroach Yeah, a 1st in history, how many other steel framed buildings burned for 10, 15 and 20 plus hours and did not crumble like building 7?
Building 7 fell at free fall speed, meaning all the major support columns had to give at the same time, doubt a small fires could do that, but hey you seem to be the expert.
PurePowerPunk 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PurePowerPunk The collapse of WTC 7 and other 9/11 events are all fully explained on this website: WWWdotDEBUNKING911dotCOM
ParagramTree 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@popeyroach The collapse of WTC 7 and other 9/11 events are all fully explained on this website: WWWdotDEBUNKING911dotCOM
ParagramTree 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHO CARES? Human beings have perpertrated atrocities since our beginning; holocaust, the crusades, genocides, pillages, wars etc. so what's the big deal? just embrace yourselves for the next ones to come. It's what we humans do best
born912 4 months ago
Why did they wait eight hours ?
pec104 4 months ago
@pec104 Because the police and fire dept. got there asses handed to them from the initial collapse of the towers you moron. You are all idiots.
jackofclubz 4 months ago
Larry S said "they made that decision to pull"... as in the action was going to be taken to intentionally take down the building.... And it takes weeks to set up a building for a controlled demolition- as the experts state here. My mind is completely fucking blown away at how painfully obvious it is that this points to an inside job. It TAKES WEEKS yet NYFFs can set up a controlled demo in less than a day. What the fuck....What the fuck? WHAT THE FUCK!?!
GeneralMaximus4 5 months ago
@GeneralMaximus4 The quote by Larry is completely twisted around. He is referring to "pull" the rescue mission. "Pull it" is NOT a term used by personnel demolishing a building. There was also NEVER ANY physical evidence pointing towards a demolition.
As3sinoL0C0 5 months ago
@As3sinoL0C0 who gives a fuck, building 7 wasn't even hit by a plane. a fire will not make a building collapse like that, come on ppl wake the fuck up this shit is so fuckin obvious. if u believe the "official" 911 story you either work for the gov or you are just in fuckin denial.....we need 2 stand up and take OUR country back from these scumbag elites like the rothschilds,rockefellers, henry kissinger,zbignew brzezinski ect....we need to start goin up an placing them under citizens arrest lol
pctG304 4 months ago
@pctG304 Thank you for that. I for one will never stop until these criminals are rotting in prison for all eternity. It was not 19 muslim hijackers who hated our freedom that did 911. It was the CIA, MI6, the KGB, Pakistani intelligence services and the Mossad and probably a few other intelligence services. What these fools don't realize is that it's we the people against all the governments of the world. It's that simple. Either accept the truth or take the blue pill and go back to sleep.
Daddyo930 4 months ago
@pctG304 Damn straight my man. It's amazing they try to remake Newtonian physics for those of us who understand they math. Peace.
WilliBond0007 4 months ago
@As3sinoL0C0 I don't know if the term "pull it" is used by personnel doing controlled demolition or not, but I believe it's totally obvious that in this case it meant "pulling the plug" on the efforts to contain the fire. The notion that it meant a "command" to demo the building is ridiculous, childish.
There was probably never any evidence RELEASED of controlled demo either, but then again - if gov. did it on purpose, wouldn't they cover it up? And it DID look 100% as controlled demolition.
PanicusVulgaris 4 months ago
Explosions are pretty common in fires. Use Google News to search "fire" and "explosion" and you'll get a torrent of news stories in which explosions occurred in fires.
PoetryHound 5 months ago
DEBATE OVER
/watch?v=l8oXH9TdDuc&feature=channel_video_title
homerbear46 6 months ago
FOX reporter Jeffrey Shapiro says several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told him that Larry Silverstein was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the WTC 7.
ZionistsRunTheGov 6 months ago
A lot of people heard explosions on 911. Most large building fires will have loud explosions, 911 was no exception. A few Examples:
Explosions as Firefighters Tackle Fire at Falmouth Docks:
"Jamie Clark, who was staying about 60m (200ft) from the scene of the fire, said he was woken up by explosions"
Winter Haven Fire Claims 3 Homes:
"We ran out of water, we waited for more water. Then started attacking the explosions... We have multiple explosions..."
I can keep going ....... NO BOMBS
theBartone9119 6 months ago
Plus I've heard the silly Thermite/Thermate theories. They have all the common traces of Thermite/Thermate and say they have "Thermite/Thermate" for sure, what a load of bull. They are called COMMON traces for a reason. For example, Sulfur is in Thermite/Thermate, sulfur is also in the dry wall in the towers, explained. Plus you can't use Thermite/Thermate to take down a building, if it was efficient it would be used...NO building has been brought down with T in History, never will
theBartone9119 6 months ago
I see no detonation cords from the base of the building, no squibs(no real squibs on towers either), or flashes. The biggest give away that it wasn't a controlled demolition? Every one I've heard, was loud as hell, it would be really difficult to hear someone talking over it. When reviewing Building 7 footage, there are no multiple explosions heard right before the towers fell, and there are people talking softly and you can hear them perfectly. That is the biggest give away that it was no CD.
theBartone9119 6 months ago
@theBartone9119 there are many reports of explosions. No chords? Are you completely retarded? yes we will just bring it down with the chords showing!
olddouchebag 6 months ago
This looks nothing like a controlled demolition. With every demolition I've seen, the building falls almost inside its own foot print, with debris rarely outside of it , Building 7 caused billions of dollars of damage blocks away (Deutsche Bank had to be rebuilt), that is the opposite of inside it's foot print. It would be free fall for ENTIRE collapse as well most likely, NIST said there was only 2.3 seconds of free fall (which makes sense). I see no CD characteristics
theBartone9119 6 months ago
Ok, so we can't all agree on the fact that it was a Controlled Demo, but.... those billowing dust clouds DO look quite alike! And those come from ALL 3 buildings!
TazarZero 7 months ago
First of all Alex Jones, we don't agree on shit. I can't even be convinced that commercial airliners hit the building. There is no definitive video showing a long shot of anything hitting the buildings. When I say "long shot", I mean a shot showing the plane 2 miles out, 1 mile out and then impact. All video's I have seen only show about 5 seconds until impact. Many people took video that day. Where are the long shots?
Daddyo930 7 months ago
@Daddyo930 I can't even be convinced that America exists. Sure there's lots of video and stuff but how do we know that it's not faked? The media lie all the time and government. I think America is a fictional place created by the elites that control the government and the media.
ketsan 7 months ago
You guys have got to move into the 21st century. Old school methods would never have been considered. Radio detonation eliminates the need for all this det cord that would have been found by people not looking for it (wow).
MANY first responders reported explosions and their information suppressed.
You have got to open your mind to the reality that surrounds you. Nothing is as it seems. The intel community runs most everything and disinformation is standard procedure. You're brain washed.
Akileze 7 months ago
Sifted thro it with a 'fine tooth comb' did they?
NIST et al admitted not even considering explosives but now the tale is being spun into a 'fine tooth comb' line of shill crap.
Seriously dude.....
v
v
v
Akileze 7 months ago
@Akileze Well when you consider how tiny the fragments of bone were that they were pulling out of there.......If you're pulling out things that small a couple of miles of det cord is going to stand out.
ketsan 7 months ago
i was thinking could united 93 have been headed for building seven? just whink about that
bifster98 7 months ago
@bifster98 I thought about it, and I've reached the conclusion that you are a dipshit.
TMusic5 7 months ago
@bifster98 awww shiit
hutchinson1995 7 months ago
So these controlled demolitions, several tens of tons of high explosives all being ripple fired over a couple of seconds......how did they manage to muffle the sound of all that? Where are the flashes of the explosives going off? Where are the burn marks, the det cord and the copper plating? How did they manage to steal several thousand tons of steel if there was no steel recovered or is that a quote mine?
ketsan 7 months ago
@ketsan look up what was done with the twin tower steel after
hutchinson1995 7 months ago
@hutchinson1995 They sifted through it with a fine tooth comb and nobody seems to have found a trace of detcord, copper, the burn marks associated with controled demolition.
ketsan 7 months ago
@ketsan ya they did
hutchinson1995 7 months ago
@hutchinson1995 So where is it? And could you please elucidate on how several tons of high explosive was detonated silently?
ketsan 7 months ago
@ketsan Could you even admit that NIST never tested for explosives in direct violation of NFP procedure? Did your handlers say that you are allowed to admit that?
Daddyo930 7 months ago
@Daddyo930 The explosives that don't go bang? Are those the explosives you're talking about? You realise that it's more plausible that genetically engineered metal eating hamsters were used to gnaw through beams causing the collapse than that explosives were used? Did anyone check for hamster droppings? No? See a government cover up, you can tell by the lack of evidence.
ketsan 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ketsan Could you even admit that NIST never tested for explosives in direct violation of NFP procedure? Just try and stick with that question.
Daddyo930 7 months ago
@ketsan ya i know, people would of heard bombs going off, i dont think anybody reported that
hutchinson1995 6 months ago
@hutchinson1995 many people reported hearing explosions.
olddouchebag 6 months ago
@olddouchebag ya gas line explosions and elevator shaft explosions and whatever else happens naturally during building fire
hutchinson1995 6 months ago
@olddouchebag cars exploding, electrical equipment exploding, diesel tanks exploding. no one said they heard a bomb.
breadsped98 5 months ago
@breadsped98 many people reported hearing explosions in the building. I can't believe how many people STILL believe the official story.
olddouchebag 5 months ago
@olddouchebag they said explosions, not bombs. what's in an office building? computers, printer and copy machines, gas pipes, electrical circuits, diesel fuel tanks, generators, elevators, and just about any other material you can find in an office building that can 'explode' .
breadsped98 5 months ago
@hutchinson1995 yes there could have been those too. Have a look at 'architects and engineers for 9/11 truth' There is some great info there.
olddouchebag 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't know if I made myself clear...
WilliamAztech 7 months ago
If there were explosives planted in World Trade Center 7, they would have been heard from miles around and clearly recorded on tape. Watch any video of buildings being demolished with explosives and you will hear a series of very loud bangs throughout the buildings. There are no sounds of explosions recorded on tape from WTC 7. Correct me if I'm wrong.
TimothyRaymond1 7 months ago
@TimothyRaymond1 You mean like these ones : watch?v=0YvrKfWkxdw ? As 1 of the firemen is stating "We need to get back, 7`s exploding". These particular explosions are LOUD!
roxxphatcox 7 months ago
plus the only "expert" named in this video is a theologist professor... RIGHT, a person who believes in angels, devils, hell, adam, eve, is surely someone who might have a neat take on FACTS in general.. hahah
WilliamAztech 7 months ago
@WilliamAztech Fact such as the ones NIST completely ignores...? That there was no measurable deceleration of the falling top section of WTC 1 on alleged impact with the lower part of the building...? And that the demoltion wave (sometimes referred to as "pancaking floors") was moving down at pace with (and locally even faster than) ejected and freely falling steel sections of the perimeter walls..? And facts such as they have not analyzed the collapse mechanisms PULVERIZING the concrete..?
Funkadelic2 7 months ago
@Funkadelic2 you people like to ignore the magnitude of the potential energy the top of the building signified...
WilliamAztech 7 months ago
@WilliamAztech ---> the opposite - hence should have suffered the exact same consequenses on impact as the lower 98 floors. What can be seen happen to the top is a) that it is almost completely disintegrated before the lower part begun collapsing, and b) that the roofline was not decelerating on alleged impact between the two blocks. In other words: there was no impact, and some other energy source had to have been been present to destroy the top section before the lower part began collapsing.
Funkadelic2 7 months ago
@Funkadelic2 that's not true. the destruction of the floors below the impacted floors are at the same rate of the destruction of the floors above that point. The destruction is mostly beyond visible reach, since the interior was collapsing a little earlier than the exterior. Plus, soon everything was covered with dust. The idea it was a uniform pancaking of whole floors is cartoonish. Sometimes I think many people are not watching the same videos as I am...
WilliamAztech 7 months ago
@WilliamAztech It is very obviolusly happening exactly the way I just described. Those columns are passed by the main wave of destruction before being ejected. I can point it out very precisely for you: At 0 : 12 (and at every 10th second throughout the entire clip: 0 : 22, 0 : 32, 0 : 42...) those columns can be seen emerging from the already descending dust clouds, being hurled out with great lateral force towards building 7. There is no escaping that fact..
/watch?v=hSApOavkHg8
Funkadelic2 7 months ago
@Funkadelic2 I really don't see it as being hurled out with great lateral force. Like I said, the great amount of dust clouds preclude you from seeing exactly what is happening. If the steel columns you refer to are the exterior façade ones, that's a big chunk of façade going sideways, there is no need of explosives for that to happen. If you picture it as a big chunk of façade being cut loose and falling sideways, when eventually the lower part breaks, than you get that image.
WilliamAztech 7 months ago
@WilliamAztech ----> you can see the very same event even more clearly. At 7 : 47 you can see it as well, and you can compare the behavior of those columns to those of the still standing parts of the core, which had a more natural way of falling straight down once severed. To have such heavy debris going +300 feet sideways from about 800 feet up means huge lateral forces being present even where the main collapse had already passed the level of the building from where those columns were coming.
Funkadelic2 7 months ago
@WilliamAztech If you cannot see that those columns I referred, and pointed the exact time position for, are emerging from the dust (although of course there's still some dust surrounding them too) as the wave of destruction has already passed by (they are emerging right at 0 : 12 and on the left side of the top of the "canapé" where the sunlight is shining on top of it. At 1 : 57 in this clip:
/watch?v=Jil7sDgVEUU
---->
Funkadelic2 7 months ago
@WilliamAztech ----> also (or, at least SHOULD have been) tremendous resistence present from the lower part of the structures. It is a simple fact that the lower part of the building constituted approximately 90% of the total mass of the structure, where the steel columns were getting increasingly thicker towards the base.
The top section of WTC 1 was not a solid block of steel, more rigid than the lower part in any sense at all, rather ---->
Funkadelic2 7 months ago
@WilliamAztech I really don't accept dividing people into "them" and "us". And nobody is ignoring any potentlal energy releases at all. There was a lot of potential gravitational engery present, sure, but there was ---->
Funkadelic2 7 months ago
there's an obvious difference between the other implosion shown here, where you can see actual explosions throughout the buildings, whereas in WTC7 you see no explosions really, the building just falls down. Some people seem to underestimate what the "debris" which hit WTC7 was, like as if it were a few little concrete crumbles. Plus, everyone knew WTC7 was coming down. I remember precisely watching it on tv, and it was no secret everyone was waiting for it to go down.
WilliamAztech 7 months ago
there is no consperiacy theory who ever believes this is a moron. you van make anything sound like a consperiacy and make up facts
thematt121295 8 months ago
@thematt121295 After reading your comment I seriously thought to myself; "Can a person actually type something this ridiculously stupid & actually believe someone will take him seriously?" Then I realized you must be 1 of 2 things; A) You are an ape named Matt & your zoo-keeper gave you temporary access to a computer, or B) You are a retarded 12 year old that just learned how to go potty & wipe his own ass. I'll go with B. Now go learn how to tie your shoes douche bag.
madtown99980 8 months ago
@thematt121295 you can be smarter than this
antonfilth 8 months ago
@thematt121295
That comment and you having your head in your ass would be funny..
except that people have died, gone to war--> more people died and suffered.. kids have been raped, wounded and killed.. The resources have been given to a handfull of corporations.. Laws have been changed to strip people from their rights.. and their wealth stolen..
And the truth still remains hidden from the public..
Yeah, it would be funny.. if not..
TAKE YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS!
KmanMonkeyPig 8 months ago
whats funny is there has to be experts to bring a building down. but a random fire is supposed to do that as well. so next time anyone wants to bring down a building, you can save your money by just setting it on fire. forget paying those experts to bring it down! hell, i will start a new company, every controlled demolition company will be out of business, i just need gas and matches haha
donisthabomb1 8 months ago
@donisthabomb1 Or a fully fueled 767 slamming into it at 500 mph... ha ha. Idiot
mikeyt34 8 months ago
@mikeyt34 No plane hit WTC 7 moron
treehuggingaj 8 months ago
@donisthabomb1 a "random fire"... right...
WilliamAztech 7 months ago
why no sound of dynamite explosions?? no blasting caps, wires or other demolition materials?? where is your proof???????? conspiracy theorists and corrupt govts have at least 1 thing in common.. NO PROOF. you're all mindless idiots..
miamiwax 8 months ago
@miamiwax Now now, when have cold hard facts been any use to conspiracy theorists? I mean the caps and basement explosions aside (or lack of), imagine if it took 4 months to set up a controlled demolition, with diggers and men drilling into the structure and foundation to weaken it and place the explosives. With miles of det cord all over the building, no one would have noticed that. Oh and imagine if all demolition companies in the world said 'pull it' is not a term they use.Facts are pointless
hornetgags 8 months ago
who cares what "pull it" means , all i need is eyes to know that building 7 was blown up on purpose. i dont even need to watch it twice come on ppl , u dont need to be an expoert to have common sense. and the fact that the commission report (500+pages) didnt mention it ONE time , puts the nail in the coffin and proves without a doubt that whole day was planned out year ago by this govt.. i would suggest anybody that supports the official BS read the commission report free on google
fhab525 9 months ago
Professor Griffin is a theologian, not a structural engineer. 95% of structural engineers see no evidence of a controlled demolition. Why do you believe a theologian over the structural engineers?
peterloohunt 10 months ago 2
@peterloohunt 95% of those SE's u mention have NOT and have NEVER stated IN PUBLIC that they buy the official explanation. U may guess why? If they would have to explain why they think they official NIST account is somehow scientific & true, they would make a complete fool of themselves.
Obviously u haven't noticed all the distortions, lies and omissions in those thick reports. Besides that u seem to lack knowledge of basic physics and chemistry, and odds as well. Come on dude, wake up.
Sandberg1972 10 months ago
@peterloohunt
you dont need a structural engineer to tell you that something is wrong with way that WTC 7 collapse. You stupid ideas are back in a corner so you arm yourself with "science". it is ridiculously stupid to believe an engineer to what is evidently simple!
se7ensnakes 9 months ago
I've never heard a demolitions expert use the term "pull it" to mean "destroy it with explosives." I"m pretty sure this is just a bit of truther dogma that no one is supposed to question.
unRompecabezas 10 months ago
@19d4life
Yes it has, and if I have to explain it to you, you are a scrub
splendid1000 10 months ago
@19d4life
First of all I never said it was the only reason we went to war lol. its so much more complicated than that. Im simply saying this conflict has not hurt big oil...
splendid1000 10 months ago
@19d4life
LoL, oil going up is a good thing for big oil execs...thats one reason we went there
splendid1000 10 months ago
@19d4life
Where'd he hide them? In the Tandoori Chicken?
splendid1000 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@19d4life The memo recorded the head of the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) as expressing the view following his recent visit to Washington that "[George W.] Bush wanted to remove Saddam Hussein, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were
longanddeadly 10 months ago
@19d4life lol downing street memo nuff said
longanddeadly 10 months ago
@longanddeadly The memo recorded the head of the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) as expressing the view following his recent visit to Washington that "[George W.] Bush wanted to remove Saddam Hussein, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were
longanddeadly 10 months ago
Respond to this video... were being fixed around the policy." It also quoted Foreign Secretary Jack Straw as saying that it was clear that Bush had "made up his mind" to take military action but that "the case was thin",
longanddeadly 10 months ago
@19d4life when you sell out human souls for oil money your a gremlin.
longanddeadly 10 months ago
how fuicking messed up is this society that shit like this is up for debate....
its fucking mind boggling....
longanddeadly 10 months ago
@19d4life george doubya and dick chains are both fucking gremlins and then some
longanddeadly 10 months ago
Alex, Dumbass, Jones' logic; "Building 7 was CD'd to fall in it's own footprint so it wouldn't damage other buildings around it." Yeah, because our government is evil enough to destroy and kill so much on 9/11 in the interest of keeping other buildings around it safe. It's fun to watch you idiot twoofers contradict logic, yourselves, and your own conspiracies. You mushrooms wouldn't know logic if it knocked on your door, pissed on your shoes, then invited itself in to eat all of your food.
Kicker1981 11 months ago
@Kicker1981 tell me what files did building 7 contain? if you dont even know that please have a nice cup of flouride tea and stfu
longanddeadly 10 months ago
@longanddeadly Well, unless those files were somehow extremely explosive in nature and had some direct bearing on the building coming down, then I guess it really doesn't matter what was in there, now does it? I like how you dumbasses who follow this jackwagon think you're somehow "enlightened" to the truth, when all you are are sheep to a different shepard. What flavor of Kool Aid is Alex serving this week? I hear the grape flavor is to die for.
Kicker1981 10 months ago
@Kicker1981 wait so if a building falls on its own ...the files it contained dont matter....?
ok troll im done talking to u
longanddeadly 10 months ago
@longanddeadly patriotism is an ignorant concept...these lines you draw on maps dont exist in real life....its all god's land....
longanddeadly 10 months ago
@longanddeadly You're done talking to me? Outstanding, now I can move on to bigger and better things.
Kicker1981 10 months ago
I find it funny that all of the sheep who think WTC 7 went down by controlled demolition do so on the premis that explosions don't make sound. You idiots can't even take 2 seconds to see the lack explosive noise on all of the footage (much of it is in this very video). A boom loud enough to control demo WTC7 would have been reported on IMMEDIATELY, not as an afterthought as it was in the media. And before you wack jobs say the media is in on it, CNN and MSNBC were among those not reporting.
Kicker1981 11 months ago
@Kicker1981 Do you really think i would take anything seriously from a guy who still plays with toys?
bambam9969 11 months ago
@bambam9969 Don't get butthurt because a loser who still plays with toys put you in your place........which is at the bottom of the intellectual food chain. Keep up the "twoofer" fight, dumbass.
Kicker1981 11 months ago
So why do we hate muslims?? What do muslims have to do with this??
What about the danncing 5 Isralies??
DG3744 11 months ago
What a load of crap.
slooob23 11 months ago
(911 total proof bombs were planted) 20 million views. 30+ thousand (likes). Debunking videos, LOL lucky to have 50 thousand views.with more dislikes than likes, more people are waking up every day. The debunkers are a JOKE. LOL
bambam9969 1 year ago
@bambam9969 It's pretty pathetic of you to make that observation, considering the majority of people polled on this subject do not think it was an inside job, and that the anit-Bush news media isn't even reporting on it. Even Bill Maher, who despises the Bush administration, thinks you "twoofers" are whack jobs. LOL, you think YouTube views and likes/dislikes have anything to do with reality? Stupid people congregate around the internet, "twoofers" are a product of that fact.
Kicker1981 11 months ago
@Kicker1981 Pathetic. lol , Do you still watch Pokemon to? Just the facts ma'am
bambam9969 11 months ago
9/11 Truthers and Controlled Demolition believers are government SHILLS paid to discret rational, useful criticism of the immoral Bush government/ 9/11 facts. Because if they actually were onto something they'd be dead by now.
linghun 1 year ago
@linghun Really?, all us 911 was an inside job believers would be dead by now?
Sure we would buddy, sure we would.
StandStrongTogether 1 year ago
@StandStrongTogether How much is the government paying you to spread misinformation on Youtube?
linghun 1 year ago
@linghun What??????????????????????????
I dont work for the government at all, i build furniture for living.
And how the hell is my diagreeing with you saying "we wouldnt all be dead if we were on to something" should say to you or anyone that im speading mis-information,, if thats how you honestly see my remark, then maybe you should go back to watching playhouse disney and hanna momatnna.
StandStrongTogether 1 year ago
@linghun Wheres my money? wow they must have one hell of a pay roll.
bambam9969 1 year ago
Note the 4 dislikes from the sheeple and the shills.