Added: 1 year ago
From: FringeReality
Views: 5,511
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • All we need is the right execution for him and the nations will defeat their Ψ/NWO\Ψ

  • i dont know the towers were pretty hollow

  • Great video.

    I can tell that by all the trolling comments. ;)

  • idk when i did the money thing the towers looked more like two palm tress

  • @anonymoustruther2

    Ur the one with too much time on their hands to have come up with this XD

  • @anonymoustruther2

    Lol wtf yes lots, is that really the best u can do? lol i'm done talkin about such idiocies

  • Or watch this (link below) ... start watching it at 01:00 to save u time

    >> youtube.com/watch?v=eGQJ19ysTf­­U

    The 'nose-out' is nothing more than an explosion in the shape of what happened moving outwards, spreading bigger into a fireball

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • The quality of ur videos is bad (but that helps ur argument), WATCH this clear video in big screen (link below). It's proof of what i'm saying to you.. a plane in sunlight then flies UNDER the SMOKE then hits sunlight again before impact

    youtube.com/watch?v=yKsgpvJ2Nb­E

  • This wasn't a normal plane so stop applying the laws of physics to something that was much heavier, packed with explosives, flying at full velocity, with a missile to create a hole to fly into before impact. U guys have taken the truth & ran with it, takin it too far. They flew the 2nd plane in under the smoke so it'd be harder to make out exactly what type of airline it was, if there really no planes on 9-11 then ppl would be screamin that they were THERE yet didn't SEE or HEAR any planes

  • I just don't want ppl fallin for this shit like i did cos it's not all true... gettin into a debate wasn't my aim but it was an inevitabiltity i guess. Have U ever questioned what you so blindly defend? seem more interested in blindly defendin SepClues no matter what.. Are u gettin paid for it? It's real easy to see how ALL the footage is the same from 9-11! Just from different angles and perspectives... the SHADOWS of the missile after impact.. the plane catching light before impact.

  • @anonymoustruther2

    It's PRON star .. i know the laws of physics u fkn anonymous freak but THAT'S NOT THE NOSE OF THE PLANE COMIN OUT THE OTHER SIDE.. Only in ur tiny mind, dumb cunt. Enjoy spreading the bullshit man

  • @anonymoustruther2

    Yea i'm ready to hang u at any minute u unoriginal mong

  • And I agree that the Rumsfeld slip up was intentional .. but only to make us think there was/were a passenger plane(s) involved.. when we now know there wasn't .. but only applying to the Pentagon and Pennsylvania sites.. military planes were used at the WTC's (controlled from the ground) .. People saw these planes for real.

  • Comment removed

  • @anonymoustruther2

    Ur the ignorant one. There is only one truth so we agree there but this shit is goin down the wrong road. Learn some common sense.. ur 'insults' are pathetic man. I've watched SepClues many times, was SOLD on it for a while. Vid quality wasn't the best back then, things look different to how they did in real life. Colour?? Videos have naturally different colours depepndin on what camera/effects are used. Stop comparing them as if it's the 'plane' itself that changed colour

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @anonymoustruther2

    A fucking joke? lol that's what a plane looks like when it's flying under a huge fuckin smoke cloud lol (taps ur head.. is anyone home) ... The trajectories you talk about are the SAME. U foolishly forget or ignore the fact that they were filmed from different heights (thus giving the impression of different angled trajectories). How about you open YOUR eyes? MIne are wide open.

  • @anonymoustruther2

    Hahaha thanks for telling me what i saw.. you won't and you can't answer them, i'm just statin some obvious things here (consistencies like the 'plane' catching light before impact) .. i guess we'll agree to disagree and i know enough about physics to understand what i'm talkin about.

  • The plane wasn't flying in direct sunlight, it was flyin below the smoke bellowing out from the first hit, notice how it catches the light again just seconds prior to impact. The next video says 'this one had white wings' .. well that video can only show the last second prior to impact (when the plane had caught the light again) because of the positioning/buildings blocking the view of the plane

  • Comment removed

  • @anonymoustruther2

    We should be on the same side yet we're against each other.. Exactly what they want. They released all these video shots with ALTERED AUDIO.. obtaining the original audio is probably impossible / Somethin else i wanna mention, when Rumsfeld said 'the Plane that was shot down over Pennsylvania' (it should be ignored) i understand it but the proof is already there. In 1994 a plane crash created that wing shaped scar we see. On 9-11 they simply blew a huge crater in the centre

  • @anonymoustruther2

    U don't give a shit what anyone thinks (that's the prob). I've never heard of Antony Lawson so don't bother throwin that shit at me .. U are comparing a vid shot from miles away with videos made CLOSE to the event. They're all the same. Yes there's a head of a missile and it was fired just before impact (Pod/Missile) & we see the remains of it flyin out the other side in flames after impact. U can't see that from the video made far away because it's on the opposite side

  • @anonymoustruther2

    Is that ur defence? WATCH the video from the other side! the blast has the exact same characteristics! I think u are so hell bent on defending this (for whatever reason) that u fail to realise or accept the fact that on all the videos there is an explosion that could possibly look like a nose-out from far away (silhouetted)

  • Simon Shack for President!

  • 'The attacks must be severe enough that the ppl trapped above (where the planes crash) won't be able to escape'

  • fucker

  • And the Pod (missile launcher) underneath the planes will have enabled a deeper penetration of the building. The military planes were packed full of explosives/incendiaries

  • The 'nose-out' theory from September Clues is wrong. In that first clip we are looking at the Twin Towers from the shadow side (which has a silhouette effect).. as the plane smashes through the building, what may appear as a nose shaped object coming out from the other side is infact the explosion itself. I've seen clips from the OTHER side of the building which clearly show that the blast takes the natural angle from impact. Sep. Clues does however show how the Media manipulated footage.

  • Hey Asperger boy, did you notice how long your little yellow arrow stayed level at 4min 47sec after its steep descent because of the condensed-angle head on telephoto shot? ( which thus conforms exactly to the side shot taken from under the bridge)

    and that 20 dollar bill nonsense?? are you kiddin me? are you doing this on purpose to discredit the so-called "truthers" and make them look like paranoid twats?

    yes, of course you are... good job, POE. :D

  • watch?v=AXda5Kn2LAM

  • this short video sums it up superbly

    you should add an annotation for september clues part A when you introduce it

  • @smoketweed09

    Yes, I know... I've uploaded SC later and I forgot to link it... it's not the only one to do...

  • What the eyes see and the ears hear, the mind believes, which is exactly how you get deceived. They are deliberately exposing the dark side of the illuminati so the light sight can take over and usher in the antichrist new age delusion for those who don't love the truth in order to be saved.

  • There will be a Reckoning...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more