Here is the paper, which you can access and read through Google Scholar:
Levitt, Steven D. (1994). Using repeat challengers to estimate the effect of campaign spending on election outcomes in the US House. Journal of Political Economy, 102(4), 777-798.
Bloomberg outspent Thompson 14-to-1, and he won by 4.6%. Cut Bloomberg's spending in half (7-to-1), and he would win by 3.6%. Cut it in half again (3.5-to-1), and he would win by 2.6%. Cut it in half again (1.75-to 1), and he would win by 1.6%. Cut it in half again (0.875 to 1), and he would win by 0.6%. Yes, Bloomberg could spend less than Thompson and still win.
@MassDeportation You need to read Ekman's papers on contempt. It is the only asymmetrical facial expression, with the edge of one lip turned down. Bloomberg was not expressing it.
This question about him capping his funds is stupid as hell, it's his money he can do what he wants with it, god where do some of these people come from.
Almost every single response Bloomberg has given to a reporter that could be described as "aggressive" or "arrogant" is really a response to a poorly structured and stuttered question.
"Um...if..if the economy is turning around, uh as you said, does that mean that, the rational for extending t-term limits.." I mean come on. Do you ever here a reporter ask such a badly asked question to Obama. No!
Well everyone said nothing will happened to the other amendments if we ditched #2...well as you can see, #1 is at the holland tunnel on its way out of NY. Ask any black or hispanic guy about regularly having #4 violated...and if you DO happen to get arrested, forget about the speedy trial part of #6. If you don't have money, i'll be a year or 2 before your case goes to trial. Slippery slopes, ladies and gentlemen. Vote Thompson!
Comment removed
sailwed1 1 month ago
What an asshole.....
PirateHugger 3 months ago
bombberg piss off please go find something else to do liar.
johnnycmajor 3 months ago
What a scum bag!!
bklynAtrain 6 months ago
Let it snow. Let it snow. LET IT SNOW!!!
THEUPTOWNKID181 1 year ago
Here is the paper, which you can access and read through Google Scholar:
Levitt, Steven D. (1994). Using repeat challengers to estimate the effect of campaign spending on election outcomes in the US House. Journal of Political Economy, 102(4), 777-798.
CloeBuckingham 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bloomberg outspent Thompson 14-to-1, and he won by 4.6%. Cut Bloomberg's spending in half (7-to-1), and he would win by 3.6%. Cut it in half again (3.5-to-1), and he would win by 2.6%. Cut it in half again (1.75-to 1), and he would win by 1.6%. Cut it in half again (0.875 to 1), and he would win by 0.6%. Yes, Bloomberg could spend less than Thompson and still win.
CloeBuckingham 1 year ago
@MassDeportation You need to read Ekman's papers on contempt. It is the only asymmetrical facial expression, with the edge of one lip turned down. Bloomberg was not expressing it.
CloeBuckingham 1 year ago
2:22 How about, "Oh, could I give you a hand?" What a jackass.
crispy1995 1 year ago
This question about him capping his funds is stupid as hell, it's his money he can do what he wants with it, god where do some of these people come from.
readynow12345 1 year ago
Bloomberg brought his re-election. He is a corrupt politician. He and his "mayors against illegal guns" are just nonsense. Bloomberg is an ASS!
wrodjr 2 years ago
@wrodjr Untrue. Read Freakonomics. Campaign spending has little affect on the result.
CloeBuckingham 1 year ago
Almost every single response Bloomberg has given to a reporter that could be described as "aggressive" or "arrogant" is really a response to a poorly structured and stuttered question.
"Um...if..if the economy is turning around, uh as you said, does that mean that, the rational for extending t-term limits.." I mean come on. Do you ever here a reporter ask such a badly asked question to Obama. No!
cronoskronos 2 years ago
@cronoskronos Arrogant? Sure, when you selectively collect Bloomberg's responses together in a Youtube video. It's just taking things out of context.
CloeBuckingham 1 year ago
It's time for Bloomberg to leave. Thompson for Mayor!!!!
wrodjr 2 years ago
@wrodjr Thompson is Bloomberg's biggest fan:
Bill Thompson Praising Mayor Bloomberg in 2005
See that video.
CloeBuckingham 1 year ago
Comment removed
Alphasam8108 2 years ago
It's perfectly fine to have a dissenting viewpoint, but name calling is not only unnecessary, it takes away the legitimacy of any exchange of ideas.
BloombergWatch 2 years ago
@BloombergWatch Anyone can have a bad day.
CloeBuckingham 1 year ago
Well everyone said nothing will happened to the other amendments if we ditched #2...well as you can see, #1 is at the holland tunnel on its way out of NY. Ask any black or hispanic guy about regularly having #4 violated...and if you DO happen to get arrested, forget about the speedy trial part of #6. If you don't have money, i'll be a year or 2 before your case goes to trial. Slippery slopes, ladies and gentlemen. Vote Thompson!
LamontDaGrizzly 2 years ago
@LamontDaGrizzly Thompson is incompetent.
CloeBuckingham 1 year ago
@CloeBuckingham WIPE THAT SPERM OFF YOUR CHIN!
LamontDaGrizzly 1 year ago
He has got a nasty personality.
astoria25 2 years ago 2
Thats true
1HandsomeJohnny 2 years ago
@astoria25 Nonsense.
CloeBuckingham 1 year ago